From 871a39b5cae4cbc5001a844668fb41c9bb44a72b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pierre Grimaud Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 02:34:23 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] docs: fix typos (#254) --- components/sections/catmullconv/content.en-GB.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/components/sections/catmullconv/content.en-GB.md b/components/sections/catmullconv/content.en-GB.md index 941edb79..590c3884 100644 --- a/components/sections/catmullconv/content.en-GB.md +++ b/components/sections/catmullconv/content.en-GB.md @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ But... if you want to know why that conversion works, let's do some mat ## Deriving the conversion formulae -In order to convert betwen Catmull-Rom curves and Bézier curves, we need to know two things. Firstly, how to express the Catmull-Rom curve using a "set of four coordinates", rather than a mix of coordinates and tangents, and secondly, how to convert those Catmull-Rom coordinates to and from Bézier form. +In order to convert between Catmull-Rom curves and Bézier curves, we need to know two things. Firstly, how to express the Catmull-Rom curve using a "set of four coordinates", rather than a mix of coordinates and tangents, and secondly, how to convert those Catmull-Rom coordinates to and from Bézier form. So, let's start with the first, where we want to satisfy the following equality: @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ So, if we want to express a Catmull-Rom curve using a Bézier curve, we'll need \end{bmatrix} \] -Into somthing that looks like this: +Into something that looks like this: \[ \begin{bmatrix}