From c81ec10cb299666694d880c21304ac269a720efb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bezierinfo CI
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 15:26:03 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Automated build
---
docs/index.html | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
docs/ja-JP/index.html | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
docs/news/2020-09-18.html | 4 ++--
docs/news/2020-11-22.html | 4 ++--
docs/news/index.html | 2 +-
docs/news/rss.xml | 6 +++---
docs/ru-RU/index.html | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
docs/uk-UA/index.html | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
docs/zh-CN/index.html | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
9 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/index.html b/docs/index.html
index 57507732..00a08fea 100644
--- a/docs/index.html
+++ b/docs/index.html
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
-
+
@@ -5895,9 +5895,13 @@ lli = function(line1, line2):
>,C2.2).
- For each pair, check whether their bounding boxes overlap.
- If their bounding boxes do not overlap, discard the pair, as there is no intersection between this pair of curves.
- If there is overlap, rerun all steps for this pair.
+
+ For each pair, check whether their bounding boxes overlap.
+
+ - If their bounding boxes do not overlap, discard the pair, as there is no intersection between this pair of curves.
+ - If there is overlap, rerun all steps for this pair.
+
+
Once the sub-curves we form are so small that they effectively occupy sub-pixel areas, we consider an intersection found, noting that we
might have a cluster of multiple intersections at the sub-pixel level, out of which we pick one to act as "found" t
value
@@ -9574,13 +9578,13 @@ radialError(radius, points[]):
- We start with
low=0
, mid=0.5
and high=1
- - That'll fail, so we retry with the interval halved:
{0, 0.25, 0.5}
-
-
- - If that arc's good, we move back up by half distance:
{0, 0.375, 0.75}
.
- - However, if the arc was still bad, we move down by half the distance:
{0, 0.125, 0.25}
.
-
-
+ -
+ That'll fail, so we retry with the interval halved:
{0, 0.25, 0.5}
+
+ - If that arc's good, we move back up by half distance:
{0, 0.375, 0.75}
.
+ - However, if the arc was still bad, we move down by half the distance:
{0, 0.125, 0.25}
.
+
+
-
We keep doing this over and over until we have two arcs, in sequence, of which the first arc is good, and the second arc is bad. When we
find that pair, we've found the boundary between a good approximation and a bad approximation, and we pick the good arc.
diff --git a/docs/ja-JP/index.html b/docs/ja-JP/index.html
index ee6426db..2c1c8122 100644
--- a/docs/ja-JP/index.html
+++ b/docs/ja-JP/index.html
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
-
+
@@ -6001,9 +6001,13 @@ lli = function(line1, line2):
>,C2.2).
- - For each pair, check whether their bounding boxes overlap.
- - If their bounding boxes do not overlap, discard the pair, as there is no intersection between this pair of curves.
- - If there is overlap, rerun all steps for this pair.
+ -
+ For each pair, check whether their bounding boxes overlap.
+
+ - If their bounding boxes do not overlap, discard the pair, as there is no intersection between this pair of curves.
+ - If there is overlap, rerun all steps for this pair.
+
+
-
Once the sub-curves we form are so small that they effectively occupy sub-pixel areas, we consider an intersection found, noting that we
might have a cluster of multiple intersections at the sub-pixel level, out of which we pick one to act as "found"
t
value
@@ -9792,13 +9796,13 @@ radialError(radius, points[]):
- We start with
low=0
, mid=0.5
and high=1
- - That'll fail, so we retry with the interval halved:
{0, 0.25, 0.5}
-
-
- - If that arc's good, we move back up by half distance:
{0, 0.375, 0.75}
.
- - However, if the arc was still bad, we move down by half the distance:
{0, 0.125, 0.25}
.
-
-
+ -
+ That'll fail, so we retry with the interval halved:
{0, 0.25, 0.5}
+
+ - If that arc's good, we move back up by half distance:
{0, 0.375, 0.75}
.
+ - However, if the arc was still bad, we move down by half the distance:
{0, 0.125, 0.25}
.
+
+
-
We keep doing this over and over until we have two arcs, in sequence, of which the first arc is good, and the second arc is bad. When we
find that pair, we've found the boundary between a good approximation and a bad approximation, and we pick the good arc.
diff --git a/docs/news/2020-09-18.html b/docs/news/2020-09-18.html
index 97cdc80c..611c1bf5 100644
--- a/docs/news/2020-09-18.html
+++ b/docs/news/2020-09-18.html
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@
-
-
+
+
diff --git a/docs/news/2020-11-22.html b/docs/news/2020-11-22.html
index 865a39ce..1730346a 100644
--- a/docs/news/2020-11-22.html
+++ b/docs/news/2020-11-22.html
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@
-
-
+
+
diff --git a/docs/news/index.html b/docs/news/index.html
index 4ab842ed..81fa9d06 100644
--- a/docs/news/index.html
+++ b/docs/news/index.html
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
-
+
diff --git a/docs/news/rss.xml b/docs/news/rss.xml
index 0fc958ad..00c25144 100644
--- a/docs/news/rss.xml
+++ b/docs/news/rss.xml
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
News updates for the primer on Bézier Curves by Pomax
en-GB
- Mon Jun 07 2021 08:09:41 +00:00
+ Mon Jun 07 2021 15:25:25 +00:00
https://pomax.github.io/bezierinfo/images/og-image.png
A Primer on Bézier Curves
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
<p>— <a href="https://twitter.com/TheRealPomax">Pomax</a></p>
- Sat Nov 21 2020 16:00:00 +00:00
+ Sun Nov 22 2020 00:00:00 +00:00
2020-11-22.html
-
Rewriting the tech stack
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ draw() {
<p>— <a href="https://twitter.com/TheRealPomax">Pomax</a></p>
- Thu Sep 17 2020 17:00:00 +00:00
+ Fri Sep 18 2020 00:00:00 +00:00
2020-09-18.html
diff --git a/docs/ru-RU/index.html b/docs/ru-RU/index.html
index 61d4050e..03321e13 100644
--- a/docs/ru-RU/index.html
+++ b/docs/ru-RU/index.html
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
-
+
@@ -6158,9 +6158,13 @@ lli = function(line1, line2):
>,C2.2).
- - For each pair, check whether their bounding boxes overlap.
- - If their bounding boxes do not overlap, discard the pair, as there is no intersection between this pair of curves.
- - If there is overlap, rerun all steps for this pair.
+ -
+ For each pair, check whether their bounding boxes overlap.
+
+ - If their bounding boxes do not overlap, discard the pair, as there is no intersection between this pair of curves.
+ - If there is overlap, rerun all steps for this pair.
+
+
-
Once the sub-curves we form are so small that they effectively occupy sub-pixel areas, we consider an intersection found, noting that we
might have a cluster of multiple intersections at the sub-pixel level, out of which we pick one to act as "found"
t
value
@@ -9949,13 +9953,13 @@ radialError(radius, points[]):
- We start with
low=0
, mid=0.5
and high=1
- - That'll fail, so we retry with the interval halved:
{0, 0.25, 0.5}
-
-
- - If that arc's good, we move back up by half distance:
{0, 0.375, 0.75}
.
- - However, if the arc was still bad, we move down by half the distance:
{0, 0.125, 0.25}
.
-
-
+ -
+ That'll fail, so we retry with the interval halved:
{0, 0.25, 0.5}
+
+ - If that arc's good, we move back up by half distance:
{0, 0.375, 0.75}
.
+ - However, if the arc was still bad, we move down by half the distance:
{0, 0.125, 0.25}
.
+
+
-
We keep doing this over and over until we have two arcs, in sequence, of which the first arc is good, and the second arc is bad. When we
find that pair, we've found the boundary between a good approximation and a bad approximation, and we pick the good arc.
diff --git a/docs/uk-UA/index.html b/docs/uk-UA/index.html
index f6696765..68883840 100644
--- a/docs/uk-UA/index.html
+++ b/docs/uk-UA/index.html
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
-
+
@@ -6132,9 +6132,13 @@ lli = function(line1, line2):
>,C2.2).
- - For each pair, check whether their bounding boxes overlap.
- - If their bounding boxes do not overlap, discard the pair, as there is no intersection between this pair of curves.
- - If there is overlap, rerun all steps for this pair.
+ -
+ For each pair, check whether their bounding boxes overlap.
+
+ - If their bounding boxes do not overlap, discard the pair, as there is no intersection between this pair of curves.
+ - If there is overlap, rerun all steps for this pair.
+
+
-
Once the sub-curves we form are so small that they effectively occupy sub-pixel areas, we consider an intersection found, noting that we
might have a cluster of multiple intersections at the sub-pixel level, out of which we pick one to act as "found"
t
value
@@ -9923,13 +9927,13 @@ radialError(radius, points[]):
- We start with
low=0
, mid=0.5
and high=1
- - That'll fail, so we retry with the interval halved:
{0, 0.25, 0.5}
-
-
- - If that arc's good, we move back up by half distance:
{0, 0.375, 0.75}
.
- - However, if the arc was still bad, we move down by half the distance:
{0, 0.125, 0.25}
.
-
-
+ -
+ That'll fail, so we retry with the interval halved:
{0, 0.25, 0.5}
+
+ - If that arc's good, we move back up by half distance:
{0, 0.375, 0.75}
.
+ - However, if the arc was still bad, we move down by half the distance:
{0, 0.125, 0.25}
.
+
+
-
We keep doing this over and over until we have two arcs, in sequence, of which the first arc is good, and the second arc is bad. When we
find that pair, we've found the boundary between a good approximation and a bad approximation, and we pick the good arc.
diff --git a/docs/zh-CN/index.html b/docs/zh-CN/index.html
index 48f35f8b..1e0e0617 100644
--- a/docs/zh-CN/index.html
+++ b/docs/zh-CN/index.html
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
-
+
@@ -5977,9 +5977,13 @@ lli = function(line1, line2):
>,C2.2).
- - For each pair, check whether their bounding boxes overlap.
- - If their bounding boxes do not overlap, discard the pair, as there is no intersection between this pair of curves.
- - If there is overlap, rerun all steps for this pair.
+ -
+ For each pair, check whether their bounding boxes overlap.
+
+ - If their bounding boxes do not overlap, discard the pair, as there is no intersection between this pair of curves.
+ - If there is overlap, rerun all steps for this pair.
+
+
-
Once the sub-curves we form are so small that they effectively occupy sub-pixel areas, we consider an intersection found, noting that we
might have a cluster of multiple intersections at the sub-pixel level, out of which we pick one to act as "found"
t
value
@@ -9768,13 +9772,13 @@ radialError(radius, points[]):
- We start with
low=0
, mid=0.5
and high=1
- - That'll fail, so we retry with the interval halved:
{0, 0.25, 0.5}
-
-
- - If that arc's good, we move back up by half distance:
{0, 0.375, 0.75}
.
- - However, if the arc was still bad, we move down by half the distance:
{0, 0.125, 0.25}
.
-
-
+ -
+ That'll fail, so we retry with the interval halved:
{0, 0.25, 0.5}
+
+ - If that arc's good, we move back up by half distance:
{0, 0.375, 0.75}
.
+ - However, if the arc was still bad, we move down by half the distance:
{0, 0.125, 0.25}
.
+
+
-
We keep doing this over and over until we have two arcs, in sequence, of which the first arc is good, and the second arc is bad. When we
find that pair, we've found the boundary between a good approximation and a bad approximation, and we pick the good arc.