mirror of
https://github.com/opsxcq/mirror-textfiles.com.git
synced 2025-08-25 14:51:14 +02:00
207 lines
9.4 KiB
Plaintext
207 lines
9.4 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
08/15/91,21:53:34,223172,2,WARD CHRISTENSEN,,
|
|
08/15/91,21:57:48,223173,X,WARD CHRISTENSEN,,1
|
|
08/15/91,22:03:57,223174,2,PETE RETZBACH,,6
|
|
08/15/91,22:55:20,223175,3,DOUG MANDELL,chicago/ il,
|
|
08/15/91,23:21:30,223176,3,KEITH MANDELL,,
|
|
E#45060,
|
|
08/15/91,23:56:54,223177,1,STEVE RYAN,,4
|
|
08/16/91,10:25:24,223178,2,JASON TOMKO,schaumburg,
|
|
E#45061,53
|
|
]JASON TOMKO,
|
|
08/16/91,12:41:01,223179,9,ERIC BOHLMAN,,1
|
|
08/16/91,12:57:20,223180,2,THOMAS HOLLINS,Valley View/ OH,10
|
|
08/16/91,13:38:39,223181,1,DAVID JOHNSON,,2
|
|
08/16/91,14:54:36,223182,2,TIM ACRED,MEMPHIS/ TN,
|
|
08/16/91,16:11:30,223183,3,CHARLES YOUNG,Chicago/ Il,
|
|
08/16/91,17:01:22,223184,2,DON PIVEN,,2
|
|
08/16/91,17:59:48,223185,2,CHARLIE KESTNER,,5
|
|
08/16/91,19:36:10,223186,1,PETER FLIEGEL,,2
|
|
08/16/91,20:22:48,223187,2,JIM PERKINS,,4
|
|
08/16/91,21:05:11,223188,1,BERNARD GOLDLUST,,1
|
|
08/16/91,21:09:51,223189,2,JAMES SCHMIDT,,1
|
|
08/16/91,21:20:25,223190,2,ALEX ZELL,,
|
|
08/16/91,21:42:04,223191,2,CHARLIE KESTNER,,1
|
|
]__Chinet been down long?
|
|
__I tried there about 1830 and again now, and no joy either time.
|
|
CHARLIE KESTNER,
|
|
08/16/91,22:18:39,223192,2,MICHAEL SALSBURY,Sewickley/ PA,6
|
|
08/16/91,22:54:43,223193,3,KEITH MANDELL,,
|
|
08/17/91,01:33:41,223194,1,ROY LIPSCOMB,,1
|
|
08/17/91,01:47:26,223195,3,P AS,,2
|
|
08/17/91,04:24:49,223196,2,JIM THALE,,1
|
|
08/17/91,07:15:41,223197,3,MURRAY ARNOW,,3
|
|
08/17/91,08:32:09,223198,2,BILL FISCHER,,6
|
|
08/17/91,09:40:03,223199,2,JOE JESSON,,4
|
|
08/17/91,09:46:12,223200,2,BILL FISCHER,,3
|
|
08/17/91,10:19:41,223201,9,JIM POLOUS,,4
|
|
08/17/91,12:08:17,223202,2,ALEX ZELL,,0
|
|
]Chinet seemed to have been down most of yesterday, but up now.
|
|
However, all I get is garbazh on ttyd/c (725). Other lines are
|
|
busy. Called randy and he said it must be in my machine. Tried
|
|
other combos and it didnt work so I called here to see if I run
|
|
into the same problem. I don't.
|
|
ALEX ZELL,
|
|
08/17/91,14:56:21,223203,2,CHARLIE KESTNER,,1
|
|
]__Well, it just be MY luck, then; because I just called there
|
|
on 5890 and all I got was a no-answer ring.
|
|
__Yeah, Randy ALWAYS says stuff like "it must be your machine,
|
|
because I _never_ have any problems". Sure. And pigs can fly.
|
|
CHARLIE KESTNER,
|
|
08/17/91,16:09:46,223204,1,STEVE SUBAR,Chicago/ IL,5
|
|
08/17/91,17:24:36,223205,2,JAMES SCHMIDT,,0
|
|
08/17/91,17:46:45,223206,2,BILL FISCHER,,4
|
|
08/17/91,19:10:30,223207,2,NICK GOODALE,Chicago/ Il,9
|
|
08/17/91,21:49:23,223208,2,MARILYN LITT,,1
|
|
08/17/91,21:52:28,223209,2,MARILYN LITT,,
|
|
E#45062,8
|
|
08/17/91,22:01:15,223210,2,MARILYN LITT,,3
|
|
08/17/91,22:04:46,223211,2,CHARLIE KESTNER,,3
|
|
08/17/91,22:54:40,223212,2,JIM CASEY,CHICAGO/ IL,2
|
|
08/17/91,23:06:19,223213,1,MIKE ROSSELL,Chicago,11
|
|
08/18/91,05:07:20,223214,2,BILL WOLFF,,3
|
|
08/18/91,06:43:06,223215,2,BILL WOLFF,,
|
|
E#45063,3
|
|
08/18/91,06:49:22,223216,1,ROY LIPSCOMB,,
|
|
E#45064,16
|
|
08/18/91,10:08:18,223217,2,ALEX ZELL,,4
|
|
]Yesterday evening I got into chinet for a few seconds, "new user"
|
|
was disabled (according to motd), only one other person was on; I
|
|
had a chance only to check mail "from" and it was gone. Haven't
|
|
been able to get on since. Must be having some trouble installing
|
|
the new program. At times like this Randy doesn't need phone calls
|
|
asking questions. He has enough to do. People don't really
|
|
appreciate him.
|
|
ALEX ZELL,
|
|
08/18/91,10:32:56,223218,2,BILL FISCHER,,2
|
|
08/18/91,11:00:39,223219,1,GREG WULF,Cicero/ IL,5
|
|
08/18/91,11:54:03,223220,2,JOE FLEMING,escondido/ ca,4
|
|
08/18/91,14:14:56,223221,1,STEVE SUBAR,,1
|
|
08/18/91,15:33:03,223222,2,CHARLIE KESTNER,,
|
|
E#45065,10
|
|
08/18/91,15:59:25,223223,2,ARMANDO ROSARIO,chicago/il,
|
|
>Help: LF,
|
|
>Help: LINEFEED,
|
|
>Help: LINE FEED,
|
|
>Help: FIRSTTIME,
|
|
>Help: FIRST,5
|
|
08/18/91,16:38:00,223224,2,ALEX ZELL,,2
|
|
]ALEX ZELL,
|
|
08/18/91,17:21:48,223225,3,DON KOLCZAK,VALPARAISO;IN,3
|
|
08/18/91,19:29:03,223226,2,RICHARD HINTON,,4
|
|
08/18/91,21:57:49,223227,2,BILL MATTSON,,2
|
|
08/18/91,22:24:26,223228,2,WARD CHRISTENSEN,,
|
|
45060 08/15/91 KEITH MANDELL => DOUG MANDELL: "COMPUTERS"
|
|
45061 08/16/91 JASON TOMKO => ALL: "WANTED BBS SOFTWARE"
|
|
45062 08/17/91 MARILYN LITT => ALL: "FAST! NOT WORKING"
|
|
45063 08/18/91 BILL WOLFF => MARTIN SCHRADER: "R/SO YOU THINK PRODIGY IS SLOW"
|
|
45064 08/18/91 ROY LIPSCOMB => MARILYN LITT: "FAST! NOT THE PROBLEM"
|
|
45065 08/18/91 CHARLIE KESTNER => MARILYN LITT: "R/FAST! NOT WORKING"
|
|
|
|
---- End of summary ----
|
|
|
|
Retrieving flagged msgs: C skips, K aborts.
|
|
|
|
Msg 45060 is 03 line(s) on 08/15/91 from KEITH MANDELL
|
|
to DOUG MANDELL re: COMPUTERS
|
|
|
|
HEY DUDE!!!! DO YOU KNOW WHERE I CAN FIND A GENEALOGY BBS????????
|
|
see ya later
|
|
KWM
|
|
|
|
Msg 45061 is 04 line(s) on 08/16/91 from JASON TOMKO
|
|
to ALL re: WANTED BBS SOFTWARE
|
|
|
|
Does anyone have any shareware for running a BBS?
|
|
s
|
|
{a
|
|
a
|
|
|
|
Msg 45062 is 16 line(s) on 08/17/91 from MARILYN LITT
|
|
to ALL re: FAST! NOT WORKING
|
|
|
|
I installed FAST! as a device driver on a model 60 with no other disk caching.
|
|
When I ran Norton's speed index, it indicated that the disk index speed had
|
|
increased, and the overall speed of the PC had gone from 7 times to 9 times as
|
|
fast as an XT.
|
|
|
|
However, none of the programs are executing faster. I timed the loading of a
|
|
compiled spreadsheet -it still took 6 minutes. I tried loading it a second
|
|
time, thinking it was a caching utility, and the next time would be faster;
|
|
but their was not increase in execution. WordPerfect still takes the same
|
|
amount of time to load and the disappointed users can see no difference
|
|
in performance.
|
|
|
|
Has anyone else had this problem, or do they have any suggestions? I
|
|
installed the EXE file for a PS/2 type machine, and I am not using
|
|
Fastopen. I left a message at the company, but they have not yet
|
|
returned my call.
|
|
|
|
Msg 45063 is 25 line(s) on 08/18/91 from BILL WOLFF
|
|
to MARTIN SCHRADER re: R/SO YOU THINK PRODIGY IS SLOW
|
|
|
|
Hi Martin! I disagree and believe there are uses for online services. I use
|
|
CompuServe, GEnie, Q-Link, and sometimes Prodigy (usually to verify con
|
|
reports). I also used The Source before they went under. I continue to
|
|
subscribe to them because they offer bare minimum cost verses high long
|
|
distance phone charges. I can usually EMAIL a friend a thousand miles or
|
|
more for a few pennies verses using another method which is more costly. I
|
|
also like online services for the news and latest computer news info. It's
|
|
also a good place to share ideas and helpful tips. They usually attract
|
|
software authors so you can also chat with them directly. Again, without
|
|
expensive long distance charges. Another thing nice about online services
|
|
is multi nodes and minimum down time. This is what paying a little extra
|
|
can provide which saves tons of time.
|
|
|
|
One little neat feature of online services that I latched on to, was Q-Link
|
|
offered a deal of one payment of $169 for a lifetime membership. This meant
|
|
you pay $169 once and no charge for basic services which normally run $9.95
|
|
per month. Well... years have past since the offer back in November 1988
|
|
and if I had to do it again... I surely would jump on another offer like
|
|
this again. True this is a Commodore only services (with some MS-DOS and
|
|
CP/M) and you need a Commodore with special software to log on with, well
|
|
now it's basically free for me and still faster than Prodigy at 2400 baud
|
|
vs. Q-Link's maximum speed of 1200 baud and Q-Link still uses graphics. I
|
|
wish other services would offer a deal like this as well. Although I doubt
|
|
if another deal would ever pop up like this again. It was perhaps... truly
|
|
once in a lifetime deal.
|
|
|
|
Msg 45064 is 14 line(s) on 08/18/91 from ROY LIPSCOMB
|
|
to MARILYN LITT re: FAST! NOT THE PROBLEM
|
|
|
|
Disk cacheing software (including, I suspect, FAST!) operate by allow
|
|
fast RE-reads of disk sectors. When you're loading a long file, there
|
|
are no re-reads, and hence the cache presents no advantage. For faster
|
|
loading of programs, there are at least two strategies you can use:
|
|
1) Make sure that your hard disk is "defragmented"; that is, that each of
|
|
the files on your hard disk occupies a single contiguous area on the
|
|
drive. Otherwise, the disk spends most of its loading time skipping from
|
|
track to track looking for the pieces of the program. 2) Create a
|
|
RAM disk in the computer's extended memory, and load the most commonly
|
|
used and/or longest programs onto that disk at boot-up time. Then place
|
|
that drive's root directory at the head of the PATH parameter in the
|
|
AUTOEXEC.BAT file.
|
|
Someone else here may have other suggestions, and may be able to tell
|
|
you if FASTOPEN would also be of benefit.
|
|
|
|
Msg 45065 is 15 line(s) on 08/18/91 from CHARLIE KESTNER
|
|
to MARILYN LITT re: R/FAST! NOT WORKING
|
|
|
|
As an adjunct to Roy Lipscomb's reply to you on this (45064),
|
|
I'd further suggest that if/when you do run a de-fragmenter, you
|
|
pick one that let's you put INDIVIDUAL files where you want them.
|
|
I.e. say you are running a program that takes overlay files
|
|
that are frequently accessed. Now, normally you'd think that you'd
|
|
wish to put the executable FIRST, but in this case, that would not
|
|
be a good strategy; the executable gets loaded once, but the overlays
|
|
are seing sought often, so it makes more sense for them to be first
|
|
on the disk.
|
|
If you've not ever USED a de-fragmenter, and have say Norton,
|
|
disable your cache program first (MOST IMPORTANT!!!), then run the
|
|
de-fragmenter.
|
|
Usually, slow load times are invariably because of fragmentation,
|
|
and trying to say, sort a large database that is heavily fragmented
|
|
can also be much slower than one'd expect.
|
|
No dup. chars.
|
|
>Function:? |