mirror of
https://github.com/opsxcq/mirror-textfiles.com.git
synced 2025-08-30 13:49:47 +02:00
941 lines
45 KiB
Plaintext
941 lines
45 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
|
|
ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÜ ÜÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÜ ÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛ (R)
|
|
ÛÛÛÛ ßÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛß ßÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛÜ ÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛ
|
|
ÛÛÛÛ ÜÛÛÛß ÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛÛÜ ÛÛÛÛ ÜÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÜ ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ
|
|
ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÜ ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛß ßÛÛÛ ÛÛÛ
|
|
ÛÛÛÛ ßÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛ ßÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛß ÛÛÛ
|
|
ÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛ ßÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÜ ÜÜÜ ÛÛÛ ÜÜ
|
|
ÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛ ßÛÛÛÛÛÛÛß ßÛÛÛÛß
|
|
|
|
O F F I C I A L P O L I C Y S T A T E M E N T
|
|
|
|
ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
|
|
Revision #3 Updated: January,1,1993
|
|
ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
|
|
This Revision subsedes all Previous Policy Revisions.
|
|
Compiled by Tim Settle 72:72/0
|
|
|
|
(C) Copyright 1992, 1993 Tim Settle/IZC
|
|
RANet(tm) Lubbock, TX All Rights Reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND:
|
|
|
|
This is the Policy and Structure of RANet, a new approach in
|
|
private electronic message distribution and a no-fee system
|
|
offered to approved affiliated nodes agreeing to abide by its
|
|
rules and regulations as contained in this document.
|
|
|
|
RANet's motto sums up its philosophy:
|
|
|
|
"RANet: Dedicated to the Great Masterpiece"
|
|
|
|
THE SPIRIT OF RANET:
|
|
|
|
The Spirit or Raison d'Etre of RANet is the exchange of
|
|
electronic messages and vibrant conferences (popularly known as
|
|
EchoMail) with reliability and dedication as if it were a
|
|
successful business rather than what it is, an amateur network.
|
|
|
|
The echoes on RANet are Original, Active, Plentiful - three
|
|
excellent reasons to join this well-administered Network.
|
|
Friendly hobbyists like yourself, everyone who has accepted
|
|
(or ever will accept) an "official" position at any level
|
|
within RANet is a person recognized for carrying out his/her
|
|
responsibilities with professional earnestness.
|
|
|
|
ECHOMAIL STANDARDS WITHIN RANet:
|
|
|
|
RANet Echomail Policy MUST be read by each SysOp and is
|
|
contained in this archive as RA_ECHO.POL. Our Echomail Policy
|
|
differs drastically from most other networks, and you should be
|
|
keenly aware of it.
|
|
|
|
Because each SysOp decides which echoes he/she will carry on
|
|
their BBS, EchoMail conference creations within RANet are
|
|
limited only by the lack of imagination or effort put forth by
|
|
those who want a particular conference to exist. This Network
|
|
thrives on and is dedicated to echoes; potential moderators
|
|
without experience will receive friendly and helpful guidelines
|
|
by contacting the Zone Echo Coordinator (72:72/2) or their
|
|
NEC. Experienced moderators from conferences outside RANet
|
|
should also contact their RANet NEC for guidelines before
|
|
submitting their proposed conference to the Backbone.
|
|
|
|
This Network is unique in that there are definite rules and
|
|
guidelines established for Moderators. Please file request
|
|
MODRULES.ZIP from your REC or the ZEC.
|
|
(not avaiable at this time)
|
|
|
|
GENERAL PROHIBITIONS FOR ECHOMAIL CONFERENCES ON RANet:
|
|
|
|
1. No conference that violates FCC regulations;
|
|
|
|
2. No conference that in any way advocates pirated software;
|
|
|
|
3. With rare exception, no conference may be moderated by a
|
|
non-RANet SysOp. A Moderator who is a Point off an
|
|
RANet Boss node is considered an RANet affiliated
|
|
member; the same criterion applies to a Moderator who is
|
|
a User of an RANet BBS.
|
|
|
|
4. No conference will be accepted on the Backbone until it
|
|
has been active on the local RANet BBS originating it
|
|
and on one other BBS. This will give the ZEC a clue that
|
|
the conference has already established a track record. The
|
|
proposed local conference also must have been active on
|
|
the following two systems: 72:72/0 & 72:72/2 .
|
|
|
|
5. In order to prevent dupes between national networks and to
|
|
provide a more unique atmosphere in RANet, no one is
|
|
permitted to pass RANet echoes to a non-RANet BBS.
|
|
Additionally, non-RANet echoes may not be imported into
|
|
RANet without the expressed, netmailed permission of the
|
|
International Zone Echomail Coordinator. 72:72/2
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFINITIONS:
|
|
|
|
[Some of the following definitive descriptions are quoted
|
|
and/or adapted from ECHONET's Policy and are used with the
|
|
kind permission of Ed Lawyer, the current (1992) Zone
|
|
Coordinator of said Network. Additionally, this Policy
|
|
borrows freely (and in many instances, verbatim) from the
|
|
Network who parented us all: FidoNet. FidoNet Zone
|
|
Coordinator George Peace has granted us permission to quote
|
|
and/or adapt from FidoNet Policy4.]
|
|
|
|
POINTS - A point is a system which is not listed in the
|
|
nodelist, but is capable of FidoNet-Technology Electronic mail
|
|
generation and exchange. A Point is connected to the network
|
|
via one or more regular RANet nodes. Communication to or from
|
|
a point system into the greater network is always conducted
|
|
thru one or more regular nodelisted systems. The system
|
|
operator of the *nodelisted system through which a point
|
|
communicates to the network at large is responsible for the
|
|
proper adherence to RANet policy for his respective point
|
|
systems.
|
|
|
|
* A SysOp whose node number has been published in RNETLIST.*
|
|
|
|
Points are often private bulletin board systems, or sometimes
|
|
users, who choose to accept and read message traffic 'off-line'
|
|
from the nodelisted system. In terms of RANet policy, Point
|
|
systems are treated as users of a nodelisted system.
|
|
|
|
NODES - A node is a system which is capable of FidoNet-Technology
|
|
Electronic Mail generation and exchange, and is listed in the
|
|
RANet nodelists. A node is identified by a unique address
|
|
within a given network, region or zone, which is assigned by the
|
|
appropriate network or regional coordinator specific to that node.
|
|
|
|
NETWORK - A network is a collection of nodes, usually within a
|
|
relatively local geographic area. In terms of RANet, network
|
|
areas will usually be distinct geographic groupings arranged in
|
|
such a way as to facilitate the exchange of electronic mail, and
|
|
coordination information.
|
|
|
|
In an effort to further identify geographic location based on
|
|
network affiliation, RANet adopts network numbers based on the
|
|
local telephone areacodes within the area. For example, areacode
|
|
301 is assigned as Net 301. (Hub systems may be established within
|
|
a network where Long Distance charges would be incurred with mail
|
|
transfers.) Added networks in a one area code state will be
|
|
numbered with different initial digits: e.g., 1301, 2301, 3301,
|
|
etc. In instances where _local_ calls can be placed between two or
|
|
more areacodes, a network can include nodes from more than one
|
|
areacode. In this case, the network is numbered with the areacode
|
|
of the founding Network Coordinator. Assignments are performed by
|
|
the International Zone Coordinator in conjunction with the Regional
|
|
Coordinator,Zone Nodelist Coordinator and Zone Echo Coordinator when
|
|
appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
REGION - A region is a collection of both networks and independent
|
|
nodes. Independent nodes are those nodes which do not live within
|
|
reasonable proximity to existing nets or cannot be included in an
|
|
existing network for valid technical reasons which are accepted by
|
|
the Zone Echo Coordinator and Technical Coordinators.
|
|
|
|
RANet region boundaries are original and subject to change by
|
|
the Zone Nodelist Coordinator when necessary.
|
|
|
|
ZONES - A zone is a collection of regions. In terms of RANet,
|
|
the entire nodelist comprises TWO Zone, until such time as
|
|
the Zone Coordinator in conjunction with the Zone Echo Coordinator and
|
|
Technical Coordinators determines it expedient to expand into
|
|
multiple zones. RANet is known as 'Zone 72 '& 'Zone 73' (& up
|
|
for the future), which will allow proper zone-gating or domain-
|
|
gating systems of FidoNet-style mail-transfers to be utilized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
POSITIONS WITHIN RANet:
|
|
|
|
Note: Assuming you have read the "Introduction And Historical
|
|
Background" paragraphs above, you will understand why the
|
|
"Buck Stops Here" with the following three (3) hierarchical
|
|
RANet Administrative positions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTERNATIONAL ZONE COORDINATOR - The International Zone
|
|
Coordinator (ZC) is the highest administrative office within
|
|
RANet. He has ultimate authority over all RANet operations and,
|
|
since RANet is a private by-invitation-only electronic network,
|
|
he may approve or disapprove a new or an existing node without
|
|
recourse, electing to keep the reason(s) to himself. The ZC is
|
|
responsible for the overall operation and effectiveness of the
|
|
RANet Network. As such he retains a full voting position
|
|
on the Executive Board and participates in decisions affecting the
|
|
operation or direction of RANet. The Zone Coordinator(s) is also
|
|
the designated point-of-contact for all inter-net liaison with
|
|
other FidoNet-Technology Networks. Any policy disputes originating
|
|
from without RANet (Zone) must be conducted thru the ZC of that
|
|
ZONE for resolution.
|
|
|
|
ZONE ECHO COORDINATOR - The Zone Echo Coordinator(s) (ZEC) the
|
|
second in authority to the Zone Coordinator and is also the
|
|
technical authority regarding operations in terms of technical
|
|
matters within EchoNet. He is appointed by the Zone Coordinator.
|
|
The ZEC is responsible for the coordination of all technical
|
|
matters involving RANet. Specifically, message processing,
|
|
mail/message transmission and reception, and EchoMail structure
|
|
and operation, are regulated by the Zone Echo Coordinator(s).
|
|
|
|
The Zone Echo Coordinator is a full voting member of the Executive
|
|
Board.
|
|
|
|
If the office of Zone Coordinator becomes vacant, the Zone Echo
|
|
Coordinator assumes the duties of ZC,in accordance with the By-Laws.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZONE NODELIST COORDINATOR - The Zone Nodelist Coordinator(s) (ZNC)
|
|
is third in authority to the Zone Coordinator(s) and is also respons-
|
|
ible for the weekly preparation and distribution of the RANet
|
|
nodelist(s) and updates for their Zone(s).
|
|
|
|
He is appointed by the Zone Coordinator(s). All Regional Nodelist
|
|
up-dates are forwarded to the Nodelist Coordinator(s) on a weekly
|
|
basis to be merged into the RANet nodelist for thier Zone
|
|
, which the ZNC distributes (Vie Tick Files).
|
|
|
|
The Nodelist Coordinator is a full voting member of the Executive
|
|
Board.
|
|
|
|
ZONE TECHNICAL COORDNATOR - The Zone Technical Coordnator(s) (ZTC)
|
|
is the fourth in authority to the Zone Coordnator and responc-
|
|
ible for the chairmanship of the Advisory Council of the regional
|
|
Coordnators for his zone.
|
|
************************************************************
|
|
[ This possission is Elected Office , Term Last 2 Years. Elected by
|
|
The RC's of their Zone(s). Elections will accure on Even numbered
|
|
Years. Campaining Till Dec 3 , and voting 7th. Take office Jan 1.]
|
|
*************************************************************
|
|
The Technical Coordnator is a full voting member of the Executive
|
|
Board
|
|
|
|
ZONE FILE COORDNATOR - The Zone File Coordnator(s) (ZFC)
|
|
Is the fifth in authority to the Zone Coordnator and responcible
|
|
for the operation of the FileBone of their ZONE in RANet.
|
|
Under the Authority if the IZC and ZC(s) of thier Zone(s)
|
|
|
|
The Zone File Coordnator(s) are Full Voting Members of the Exective
|
|
Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE BOARD - The Executive Board consists of the
|
|
International Zone Coordinator, the Zone Echo Coordinator(s),
|
|
Zone Nodelist Coornator(s) , Zone Technical Coordinator(s),
|
|
ant the Zone FileNet Coordnator(s).
|
|
|
|
The Executive Board provides the last stage of appeal in
|
|
terms of policy administration above the Zone Coordinator,
|
|
and sets general terms of RANet direction for the network as
|
|
a whole. The Executive Board establishes or modifies existing
|
|
policy within RANet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADVISORY COUNCIL - The Advisory Council consists of each Regional
|
|
Coordinator, plus the Zone Coordinator as ex-officio member. One
|
|
of the representatives is elected by the other representatives to
|
|
serve as the Chair of the Council for a period of two (2) years,
|
|
and will be responsible for the conduct of all business. The
|
|
Chair's duties include presiding over all motions or discussion
|
|
within the Council. If a policy violation or other unresolved
|
|
problem is brought to the attention of a Regional Coordinator from
|
|
up the normal chain (Net Coordinator), and he/she is unable to
|
|
resolve it equitably, it must be brought before the Advisory
|
|
Council. If the Council's recommendations go unheeded by the
|
|
offending party(-ies), the Chair must make the issue known to the
|
|
Executive Board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
REGIONAL COORDINATOR - The Regional Coordinator(s) maintains the list
|
|
of networks, and any independent nodes within his/her respective
|
|
region. They perform an administrative function of resolving any
|
|
policy disputes brought to them in appeal from Network Coordinators,
|
|
or against any Network Coordinators themselves. The Regional
|
|
Coordinator must follow the established schedule for receiving node-
|
|
list segment updates from the network coordinators within their
|
|
region, and is responsible for the consolidation of these lists into
|
|
the regional nodelist segment, and submission to the Nodelist
|
|
Coordinator for inclusion into the weekly RANet nodelist.
|
|
Together with the latest edition of RANews, the Regional
|
|
Coordinator also receives the complete RANet weekly nodelists/
|
|
nodediffs and arranges for their distribution to the Network Co-
|
|
ordinators in a timely manner. A Regional Coordinator does not
|
|
perform message-forwarding services for any nodes in the region.
|
|
|
|
THE REGIONAL ECHO COORDINATOR (REC)
|
|
|
|
A Regional Echo Coordinator is responsible to the Zone Echo
|
|
Coordinator for all that happens in the region with regard to the
|
|
transfer and content of Echomail. The REC should be able to supply
|
|
all RANet conferences available on the Backbone to their NECs.
|
|
The Zone Echo Coordinator holds the Regional Echo Coordinator
|
|
completely responsible for the smooth operation of EchoMail within
|
|
the region. Likewise, the REC holds the Net Coordinator completely
|
|
responsible for the smooth operation of the network. It is the duty
|
|
of the REC to assure that there is absolutely NO porting of RANet
|
|
echomail to non-RANet systems; conversely, the REC must also be
|
|
certain that no non-RANet echomail is brought into RANet. The REC
|
|
must notify the ZEC if a problem remains unresolved, with carbon
|
|
copies to all concerned.
|
|
|
|
The Backbone will deliver echomail conferences to the REC(s); unless
|
|
other arrangements can be mutually agreed upon, it is the
|
|
responsibility of each REC to deliver RANet conferences to his/her
|
|
NECs or independent nodes.
|
|
|
|
THE NETWORK ECHO COORDINATOR (NEC)
|
|
|
|
A Network Echo Coordinator(s) is responsible to the Regional Echo
|
|
Coordinator for all that happens in his/her net with regard to the
|
|
transfer and content of Echomail. The NEC should be able to
|
|
supply all RANet conferences on the Backbone to their nodes
|
|
requesting them. The ZEC holds the REC(s) completely responsible for
|
|
the smooth operation of EchoMail within the region. Likewise, the
|
|
REC holds the Net Coordinator completely responsible for the
|
|
smooth operation of the network. It is the duty of the NEC to
|
|
assure that there is absolutely NO porting of RANet echomail to
|
|
non-RANet systems; conversely, the NEC(s) must also be certain that
|
|
no non-RANet echomail is brought into RANet. The NEC must
|
|
notify the offending node immediately. A node that refuses to end
|
|
this practice after one warning shall be excommunicated from
|
|
RANet. The NEC must notify the REC if a problem remains
|
|
unresolved, with carbon copies to all concerned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NETWORK COORDINATOR - The Network Coordinator(s), who is held
|
|
responsible by the Regional Coordinator(s) for the smooth operation
|
|
of all in his net, maintains the list of nodes within his
|
|
respective geographic area, which comprises his network. He
|
|
performs an administrative function of maintaining his network's
|
|
smooth operation, and resolves any local policy disputes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Network Coordinator(s) administer any local coordination
|
|
required to allow new nodes to join RANet, and for any
|
|
activities resulting in changes, additions or subtractions from
|
|
the nodelist segment within his respective network. He/she should
|
|
use network mail to inform a new SysOp of the node number, as this
|
|
helps to insure that the system is capable of receiving network
|
|
mail.
|
|
|
|
The Network Coordinator(s) is charged with coordinating the receipt
|
|
and forwarding of host-routed inbound netmail for nodes in his/her
|
|
net, implementing this in a fashion left to his/her discretion; to
|
|
make available to nodes in the network new nodelist difference
|
|
files, new issues of RANews, and new revisions of Network Policy
|
|
documents as they are received; and to periodically check to
|
|
insure that nodes use up to date nodelists.
|
|
|
|
If a node in his/her network is acting in a sufficiently annoying
|
|
manner, then the NC can take whatever action is deemed fitting,
|
|
according to the circumstances of the case with in Policy.
|
|
|
|
MAINTAINING THE NODELIST
|
|
|
|
The NC(s) should implement name changes, phone number changes, so
|
|
forth in their segment of the nodelist as soon as possible after
|
|
the information is received from the affected node. The NC(s)
|
|
should also on occasion send a message to every node in their
|
|
network to ensure that they are operational. If a node turns out
|
|
to be "offline" with no prior warning, mark the node down or
|
|
remove it from the nodelist. (Nodes are to be marked DOWN for
|
|
a maximum of 4 weeks, after which the line should be removed
|
|
from the nodelist.)
|
|
|
|
At the NC(s) discretion, a portion of this workload may be assigned
|
|
to routing hubs. In this case, the NC should receive the
|
|
nodelist segments from the Hub Coordinators within his/her
|
|
network. The NC will need to maintain a set of nodelists for each
|
|
hub within his/her network, since it is unwise to count on getting
|
|
an update from each Hub Coordinator as changes are made.
|
|
|
|
The NC must assemble a master update for his/her network and send
|
|
it to the Regional Coordinator by the day and time designated
|
|
***(Tuesday 11PM)***. The RC must assemble the master Update list
|
|
for his/her region and submit it to the Zone Node Coordinator by the
|
|
day and time designated *** (Wedensday 11PM)***.
|
|
|
|
MAKING AVAILABLE POLICIES, NODELISTS AND RANews
|
|
|
|
Each NC should obtain a new issue of RNETLIST/RNETDIFF files
|
|
every week from the Regional Coordinator. The nodelist difference
|
|
file is currently made available each Friday morning from the
|
|
ZNC at 12am for the Regional Coordinator(s), and the RANews will be
|
|
sent along with the nodediff periodically. The NC(s) must
|
|
make these files available to all nodes in the network. Or send them
|
|
directly via the TICK method. Most RC's, NC's and Hub's should have
|
|
the TICK method of distributing files 24-7.
|
|
|
|
The NC is also encouraged to write an informal what's-going-on,
|
|
what's-new-in-the-net newsletter to be distributed to his/her
|
|
nodes periodically.
|
|
|
|
Each NC should also obtain the most recent versions of the Policy
|
|
documents that bind the members of his/her network, and make those
|
|
available to the nodes in their network. Policies are released at
|
|
sporadic intervals, so please inform the nodes in your network
|
|
when such events occur, and ensure the nodes are generally
|
|
familiar with the changes.
|
|
|
|
Policy, RANews, and the RNETLIST are the glue that holds us
|
|
together. Without them, we would cease to be a community, and
|
|
become just another random collection of bulletin boards.
|
|
|
|
ENCOURAGE NEW SYSOPS TO ENTER RANet
|
|
|
|
A coordinator is encouraged to operate a public bulletin board
|
|
system which is freely available for the purpose of distributing
|
|
Policy, RANews, and RNETLIST to potential new sysops.
|
|
Dissemination of this information to persons who are potential
|
|
RANet sysops is important to the growth of RANet, and
|
|
coordinators should encourage development of new systems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYSTEM OPERATOR - Also known as 'SysOp' or Node Operator. The
|
|
SysOp or node operator within RANet who operates a network node,
|
|
or independent node within a region. All SysOps who wish to
|
|
become members of RANet must agree to abide by this policy
|
|
document as well as policy dictates by the IZC or Executive Board,
|
|
and to exist in harmony with other RANet members.
|
|
|
|
JOINING RANet:
|
|
|
|
While it is a private network, RANet is open to any SysOp who
|
|
agrees to follow the RANet Policy.
|
|
If you are a FidoNet (or other network) node, We Have our own
|
|
Node Numbering method.
|
|
(Echomail & File Transfers are sent via your RANet node number
|
|
Only.)
|
|
|
|
In order to become an RANet member, the SysOp must first obtain
|
|
an RANet SysOp Kit (available under the Magic name of "RANET" by
|
|
file request from 1:3804/2 or 72:72/1), (2:251/22 or 73:73/1)
|
|
Read and acknowledge agreement with the policy, and forward
|
|
a membership application to the Network Regional Coordinator
|
|
closest to you or the Zone Coordinator. Upon the receipt and
|
|
approval of a membership application, the new node will be added
|
|
to the weekly nodelist update submissions.
|
|
|
|
Once a member has been listed in the weekly nodelist, he becomes a
|
|
member of RANet, and is subject to RANet policy. While it is
|
|
not required that policy complaints from outside of RANet be
|
|
accepted, it is the nature of RANet that reasonable policy
|
|
complaints from outside the network will be addressed by the
|
|
International Zone Coordinator.
|
|
|
|
HOW TO OBTAIN A NODE NUMBER
|
|
|
|
You must first obtain a current nodelist so that you can send
|
|
mail. You do not need a node number to send mail, but you must
|
|
have one in order for others to send mail to you. If not
|
|
available locally, the current RANet nodelist may be file
|
|
requested from 72:72/0 (1:3804/2) 73:73/0 (2:251/22)
|
|
with the magic name "RANET".
|
|
|
|
Once you have a nodelist, you must determine which network or
|
|
region covers your area. Regions are numbered 101 ,102 ECT;(USA)
|
|
or 73?? (EUR) by state or Country this time. network numbers
|
|
are by the local areacode.
|
|
Networks are more restricted in area than regions, but are
|
|
preferred since they improve the flow of mail and provide more
|
|
services to their members. If you cannot find a network which
|
|
covers your area, then pick the region which does.
|
|
|
|
Once you have located the network or region in your area, send a
|
|
message containing a request for a node number to node zero
|
|
( 72:????/0 ) of that network or region. The request must be
|
|
sent by netmail, as this indicates that your system has RANet
|
|
capability.
|
|
|
|
HOW TO WRITE AND SUBMIT THE ABOVE MESSAGE:
|
|
|
|
Within the archive of RANET.ZIP is MAKEREQ.EXE in the requested
|
|
information. Execute Makereq and answer the Questions ,and send the
|
|
out file (LASTNAME.APP) to the RANet NC (or RC) nearest to you.+
|
|
|
|
You should poll his system for a reply after a cupple days.
|
|
This should give time to read and reply with your Node Number.
|
|
|
|
+ You must set up your software so that the from-address in your
|
|
message to the NC (or RC) does not cause problems for the
|
|
coordinator. If you are currently a member of another network,
|
|
such as FidoNet, you can send your application to the NC using
|
|
your Fido address. If you are not with another network, set
|
|
your mailer to use address 72:nnnn/9999, where nnnn is the Net
|
|
or Region you're applying to. This is only temporary until your
|
|
NC or RC assigns a node number to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your coordinator may contact you for additional information.
|
|
|
|
Please allow at least two weeks for a node number request to be
|
|
processed into the Nodelist. This should not keep you from
|
|
connection to the Echomail areas once you have you net number.
|
|
If you send your request to a Regional Coordinator, it
|
|
may forwarded to the appropriate Network Coordinator.
|
|
|
|
Once your application has been approved, and your node number has
|
|
been published in RNETLIST.A* , please link into RA_NET. This echo
|
|
is mandatory for and restricted to all RANet SysOps.
|
|
|
|
Your link to echomail will normally be your Network Echomail
|
|
Coordinator. (Or an RANet system who serves as a Hub for your
|
|
area.) If you are an independent node, then your RC will be happy
|
|
to help you arrange for your echomail conferences. As a last resort,
|
|
you may arrange to poll the Backbone (72:72/2 or 72:72/3 ).
|
|
|
|
Your weekly RANODE/DIFF and all administration files will be
|
|
available from your NC or RC.
|
|
|
|
SysOp Procedures
|
|
|
|
As the SysOp of an individual node, you can generally do as you
|
|
please, as long as you observe mail events, are not excessively
|
|
annoying to other nodes in RANet, and do not promote or
|
|
participate in the distribution of pirated copyrighted software or
|
|
other illegal behavior via RANet.
|
|
|
|
In order to prevent dupes between national networks and to provide
|
|
a more unique atmosphere in RANet, no one is permitted to pass
|
|
RANet echoes to a non-RANet BBS. Additionally, non-RANet
|
|
echoes may not be imported into RANet without the expressed,
|
|
netmailed permission of the Zone Echomail Coordinator.
|
|
|
|
***************************************************************
|
|
|
|
AMMENDEMS: Mail Routing Policies May Vary between different
|
|
Zones, due to the need of those Zones. This changes are available
|
|
from the Coordnator(s) of that Zone.
|
|
|
|
Also FileBone policys may change from Zone to Zone
|
|
Exclusion: No Non-RANet System Maybe connected to RANET FILEBONE.
|
|
Here to Known as:
|
|
|
|
(RAF) RemoteAccess Files Distribution
|
|
|
|
All RAnet File Echos will be labeled with the prefix RAF and be
|
|
the sole property of @RANet.
|
|
|
|
(This does in no way state ownership of any programs or files other
|
|
than RAnet Network files.)
|
|
|
|
****************************************************************
|
|
|
|
FAMILIAROTY WITH POLICY
|
|
|
|
In order to understand the meaning of "excessively annoying", it
|
|
is incumbent upon all sysops to occasionally re-read RANet
|
|
policy. New sysops should familiarize themselves with policy
|
|
before requesting a node number.
|
|
|
|
Responsible for All Traffic Entering RANet Via the Node
|
|
|
|
The SysOp listed in the nodelist entry is responsible for all
|
|
traffic entering RANet via that system. This includes (but is
|
|
not limited to) traffic entered by SysOp, users, and points. No
|
|
SysOp shall allow "outside" messages to enter RANet via his/her
|
|
system.
|
|
|
|
ENCRYPTION AND REVIEW OF MAIL
|
|
|
|
Like FidoNet, RANet is an amateur system. Our technology is
|
|
such that the privacy of messages cannot be guaranteed. As a
|
|
SysOp, you have the right to review traffic flowing through your
|
|
system, if for no other reason than to ensure that the system is
|
|
not being used for illegal or commercial purposes. Encryption
|
|
obviously makes this review impossible. Therefore, encrypted
|
|
and/or commercial traffic that is routed without the express
|
|
permission of all the links in the delivery system constitutes
|
|
annoying behavior.
|
|
|
|
NO ALTERATION OF ROUTED MAIL
|
|
|
|
You may not modify, other than as required for routing or other
|
|
technical purposes, any message, netmail or echomail, passing
|
|
through the system from one RANet node to another. If you are
|
|
offended by the content of a message, the procedure described in
|
|
"Not Routing Mail" must be used.
|
|
|
|
PRIVATE NETMAIL
|
|
|
|
The word "private" should be used with great care, especially with
|
|
users of a BBS. Some countries have laws which deal with "private
|
|
mail", and it should be made clear that the word "private" does
|
|
not imply that no person other than the recipient can read
|
|
messages. Sysops who cannot provide this distinction should
|
|
consider not offering users the option of "private mail".
|
|
|
|
If a user sends a "private message," the user has no control over
|
|
the number of intermediate systems through which that message is
|
|
routed. A SysOp who sends a message to another SysOp can control
|
|
this aspect by sending the message direct to the recipient's
|
|
system, thus guaranteeing that only the recipient or another
|
|
individual to whom that SysOp has given authorization can read the
|
|
message. Thus, a SysOp may have different expectations than a
|
|
casual user.
|
|
|
|
NO DISCLOSURE OF IN-TRANSIT MAIL
|
|
|
|
Disclosing or in any way using information contained in private
|
|
netmail traffic not addressed to you or written by you is
|
|
considered annoying behavior, unless the traffic has been released
|
|
by the author or the recipient as a part of a formal policy
|
|
complaint. This does not apply to echomail which is by definition
|
|
a broadcast medium, and where private mail is often used to keep a
|
|
SysOp-only area restricted.
|
|
|
|
RESTRICTED CONFERENCES
|
|
|
|
There are several conferences that are restricted to certain
|
|
positions within RANet. For example, RA_NET is an echo for
|
|
RANet SysOps only. It may not be read or seen by _anyone_ who is
|
|
not an RANet SysOp of record - meaning, if he/she is not on the
|
|
nodelist, access to this area is to be denied him or her. When an
|
|
Approved Moderator restricts an echo, those restrictions are to be
|
|
strictly observed by all who are sanctioned to carry that
|
|
conference. Other restricted conferences may be added, please
|
|
observe the Roster of Echo Areas (ECHO????.TXT) for the status of
|
|
the conferences in RANet (USA) [???=MMYY]
|
|
Magic Name: Echolist
|
|
|
|
PRIVATE MAIL ADDRESSED TO YOU
|
|
|
|
The issue of private mail which is addressed to you is more
|
|
difficult than the in-transit question treated previously. A
|
|
common legal opinion holds that when you receive a message it
|
|
becomes your property and you have a legal right to do with it
|
|
what you wish. Your legal right does not excuse you from annoying
|
|
others.
|
|
|
|
In general, sensitive material should not be sent using RANet.
|
|
This ideal is often compromised, as RANet is our primary mode of
|
|
communication. In general, if the sender of a message
|
|
specifically requests in the text of the message that the contents
|
|
be kept confidential, release of the message into a public forum
|
|
may be considered annoying.
|
|
|
|
There are exceptions. If someone is saying one thing in public
|
|
and saying the opposite in private mail, the recipient of the
|
|
private mail should not be subjected to harassment simply because
|
|
the sender requests that the message not be released. Judgment
|
|
and common sense should be used in this area as in all other
|
|
aspects of RANet behavior.
|
|
|
|
NOT ROUTING MAIL
|
|
|
|
You are not required to route traffic if you have not agreed to do
|
|
so. You are not obligated to route traffic for all if you route
|
|
it for any, unless you hold a Network Coordinator or Hub
|
|
Coordinator position. Routing traffic through a node not
|
|
obligated to perform routing without the permission of that node
|
|
may be annoying behavior. This includes unsolicited echomail.
|
|
|
|
If you do not forward a message when you previously agreed to
|
|
perform such routing, the message must be returned to the SysOp of
|
|
the node at which it entered RANet with an explanation of why it
|
|
was not forwarded. (It is not necessary to return messages which
|
|
are addressed to a node which is not in the current nodelist.)
|
|
Intentionally stopping an in-transit message without following
|
|
this procedure constitutes annoying behavior. In the case of a
|
|
failure to forward traffic due to a technical problem, it does not
|
|
become annoying unless it persists after being pointed out to the
|
|
SysOp.
|
|
|
|
IF YOU ARE GOING OFFLINE
|
|
|
|
If your node will be offline for longer than two days, inform your
|
|
coordinator as soon as possible.
|
|
|
|
Never put an answering machine or any other device which answers
|
|
the phone on your phone line while you are down. If you do,
|
|
calling systems will get the machine repeatedly, racking up large
|
|
phone bills, which is very annoying. In short, the only thing
|
|
which should ever answer the telephone during periods when the
|
|
nodelist indicates that your node will accept mail is FidoNet-
|
|
compatible software which accepts mail.
|
|
|
|
If you will be leaving your system unattended for an extended
|
|
period of time (such as while you are on vacation), you should
|
|
notify your coordinator. Systems have a tendency to "crash" now
|
|
and then, so you will probably want your coordinator to know that
|
|
it is a temporary condition if it happens while you are away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
USERS - Users are the class of individuals who do not have the
|
|
primary responsibility for the management of a network or region
|
|
node within RANet. They may be point operators, or dial-in
|
|
users of bulletin boards within RANet. Any and all actions
|
|
taken by users are the responsibility of the System Operators of
|
|
the system which the Users are accessing. Policy complaints are
|
|
not generally addressed to users, as they are not bound by RANet
|
|
policy, however the system operator is responsible, and all
|
|
complaints about users will be addressed to the operators of the
|
|
system or systems through which the user has gained access to
|
|
RANet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZONE MAIL HOUR
|
|
|
|
Zone Mail Hour (ZMH) is a defined time during which all nodes are
|
|
required to be able to accept netmail. Zone Mail Hour in RANet
|
|
corresponds to that in FidoNet:
|
|
|
|
0400-0500 EST (0500-0600 EDT)
|
|
0300-0400 CST (0400-0500 CDT)
|
|
0200-0300 MST (0300-0400 MDT)
|
|
0100-0200 PST (0200-0300 PDT)
|
|
|
|
During ZMH, there should be no BBS callers allowed on your system.
|
|
This greatly facilitates the transfer of Net and EchoMail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NODELIST
|
|
|
|
The nodelist is a file updated weekly which contains the addresses
|
|
of all recognized RANet nodes. This current nodelist is
|
|
delivered by the ZC to the RCs for distribution to their
|
|
respective NCs by Friday morning. The current nodelist is always
|
|
available for file request from any member of the Executive Board,
|
|
by using the magic name RANODE or RADIFF.
|
|
|
|
To be included in the nodelist, a system must meet the requirements
|
|
defined by this document. No other requirements may be imposed.
|
|
|
|
The full list as published by the International Zone Coordinator is
|
|
regarded as the official RANet nodelist, and is used in
|
|
circumstances such as determination of eligibility for voting.
|
|
|
|
**********************************************************
|
|
|
|
AMMENDEMS: Some of these Guide line may very from Zone to Zone.
|
|
Contact the nearest Coordnator(s) of the zone your in for more
|
|
information.
|
|
|
|
**********************************************************
|
|
|
|
POLICY GUIDELINES:
|
|
|
|
Two precepts copied from FidoNet and EchoNet applyed in RANet:
|
|
|
|
1. Thou shalt not excessively annoy others.
|
|
|
|
2. Thou shalt not be too easily annoyed.
|
|
|
|
In addition to these simple policy dictates above, the Executive
|
|
Board constantly evaluates and amends this RANet Policy document
|
|
when necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FidoNet's Expression of Excessively Annoying Behavior
|
|
Applies to RANet
|
|
|
|
There are references throughout this policy to "excessively
|
|
annoying behavior." It is difficult to define this term, as it is
|
|
based upon the judgment of the coordinator structure. Generally
|
|
speaking, annoying behavior irritates, bothers, or causes harm to
|
|
some other person. It is not necessary to break a law to be annoying.
|
|
|
|
There is a distinction between excessively annoying behavior and
|
|
(simply) annoying behavior. For example, there is a learning curve
|
|
that each new SysOp must climb, both in the technical issues of how to
|
|
set up the software and the social issues of how to interact with
|
|
RANet. It is a rare SysOp who, at some point in this journey, does
|
|
not manage to annoy others. Only when such behavior persists, after
|
|
being pointed out to the SysOp, does it become excessively annoying.
|
|
This does not imply that it is not possible to be excessively annoying
|
|
without repetition (for example, deliberate falsification of mail
|
|
would likely be excessively annoying on the very first try), but
|
|
simply illustrates that a certain amount of tolerance is extended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ELECTIVE POLICIES:
|
|
|
|
International Zone Coordinator Tim Settle shall remain in office until
|
|
he vacates it, at which time ZEC Tim Settle automatically becomes
|
|
International Zone Coordinator, and remains in that position until he
|
|
vacates the office, at which time ZNC automatically becomes
|
|
International Zone Coordinator, and remains in that position until he
|
|
vacates the office, at which time the Regional Coordinators (the
|
|
Advisory Council) will elect the new IZC from within their ranks. The
|
|
Chair for the discussion and election shall be an RC who definitely
|
|
does not want to assume the duties of IZC. (Allow no more than two
|
|
weeks of debates on who shall become the Chair.) The Chair shall
|
|
decide how long the IZC pre-election campaign will last.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Zone Echo Coordinator and Zone Nodelist Coordinator
|
|
shall remain in their respective offices until replacements are
|
|
appointed by the Zone Coordinator.
|
|
|
|
The term of office for all other administrative positions within
|
|
RANet below the Executive Board is for two (2) years.
|
|
|
|
COORDINATOR RECALL OR REPLACEMENT POLICIES:
|
|
|
|
In the rare event where there is disillusion or disharmony within
|
|
RANet, there are procedures for the removal and replacement of
|
|
the administration-chain.
|
|
|
|
In the event that disharmony has occurred thru the violation of
|
|
policy by any coordinator position, the coordinator directly above
|
|
and in the chain-of-command may dictate the removal of the
|
|
offending coordinator. This is subject to appeal by the
|
|
individual removed from office to the next-higher office in the
|
|
chain of command, but should the appeal not be made, or the
|
|
appeal denied by the appropriate authority, a replacement election
|
|
will be held for the position vacated.
|
|
|
|
A second method for the removal of Coordinator positions within
|
|
RANet is a petition for recall vote. At the Network level, ten
|
|
percent (10%) of the total number of SysOps in the net, or five
|
|
SysOps, whichever is less, may file a petition with the Regional
|
|
Coordinator for removal of the Network Coordinator in question.
|
|
|
|
The Regional Coordinator has the option to accept or deny the
|
|
petition for recall. If accepted, he will direct an election be
|
|
held establishing a vote-of-confidence of the Network Coordinator
|
|
in question. In terms of simple majority of votes cast, if the
|
|
popular vote decrees that the coordinator be replaced, a
|
|
replacement election will be held. If a simple majority of those
|
|
voting in the recall election do not wish the coordinator's
|
|
removal, he will continue in the duties of his office, and not be
|
|
subject to another recall petition for at least six (6) months
|
|
after the unsuccessful recall election.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the election held subsequent to a successful recall election, a
|
|
replaced Coordinator may run for his 'former' office unless
|
|
removed from RANet by action of the Coordinator structure. The
|
|
successful candidate in this election will serve the remainder of
|
|
the original term of office of the removed Coordinator.
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the Region level, twenty percent (20%) of the total number of
|
|
SysOps in the Region, or twenty (20) SysOps, whichever is less,
|
|
may file a petition with the Zone Coordinator for removal of the
|
|
Regional Coordinator in question. Otherwise, the procedure for
|
|
recall of Regional Coordinator is conducted in the same manner as
|
|
that of a Network Coordinator, and the Zone Coordinator's role in
|
|
this procedure is exactly the same as that of the Regional
|
|
Coordinator in Network Coordinator recalls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resignations by any position below the level of the Executive
|
|
Board will result in an immediate appointment by the next-higher
|
|
authority (if required for proper network operations) of a
|
|
temporary replacement, and a replacement election, as soon as
|
|
technically feasible, to fill the position so vacated. Voting
|
|
procedures will be determined by the Coordinator responsible for
|
|
the election, and will follow RANet policy as described by the
|
|
procedure then in effects. In cases where necessary, the
|
|
Coordinator conducting the election may appoint a neutral SysOp
|
|
within the election area to collect and pass forward for counting
|
|
and review - the ballots for the vacant office. (To alleviate the
|
|
costs of each individual forwarding their ballots long-distance).
|
|
|
|
APPEAL PROCESS
|
|
|
|
A decision made by a coordinator may be appealed to the next
|
|
level. Appeals must be made within two weeks of the decision which
|
|
is being appealed. All appeals must follow the chain of command;
|
|
if levels are skipped the appeal will be dismissed out of hand.
|
|
|
|
An appeal will not result in a full investigation, but will be
|
|
based upon the documentation supplied by the parties at the lower
|
|
level. For example, an appeal of a Network Coordinator's decision
|
|
will be decided by the Regional Coordinator based upon information
|
|
provided by the coordinator and the SysOp involved; the Regional
|
|
Coordinator is not expected to make an independent attempt to
|
|
gather information.
|
|
|
|
The appeal structure is as follows:
|
|
|
|
Network Coordinator decisions may be appealed to the appropriate
|
|
Regional Coordinator.
|
|
|
|
Regional Coordinator decisions may be appealed to the Zone
|
|
Coordinator. At this point, the Zone Coordinator will make a
|
|
decision and communicate it to the Regional Coordinators in that
|
|
zone.
|
|
|
|
Zone Coordinator decisions may be appealed to the Executive Board.
|
|
|
|
STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
|
|
|
|
A complaint may not be filed more than 60 days after the date of
|
|
discovery of the source of the infraction, either by admission or
|
|
technical evidence. Complaints may not be filed more than 120
|
|
days after the incident unless they involve explicitly illegal
|
|
behavior.
|
|
|
|
RIGHT TO A SPEEDY DECISION
|
|
|
|
A coordinator is required to render a final decision and notify
|
|
the parties involved within 30 days of the receipt of the
|
|
complaint or appeal.
|
|
|
|
If a person at any level above SysOp is unable to properly perform
|
|
their duties, the person at the next level may replace them. For
|
|
example, if a Regional Coordinator fails to perform, the Zone
|
|
Coordinator can replace him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RANEWS NEWSLETTER:
|
|
|
|
RANet offers a free 'electronic newsletter' called RANews(c),
|
|
which is provided as a central communications medium and
|
|
information exchange vehicle for our members. We are all
|
|
encouraged to make submissions and to make it available for
|
|
reading by our members. The current Editor's name and node number
|
|
is listed at the top of the RANet nodelist. Each NC should
|
|
obtain a new issue of RANews from the Regional Coordinator,
|
|
along with the last nodediff of the Week. The NC must make these
|
|
files available to all nodes in the network.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where Do I Get an RANet Policy Statement?
|
|
|
|
All "RANet NODES" must have a copy of RANet's current Policy
|
|
Statement(s) avaiable on their BBS for requests.
|
|
Or, you can file request POLICY from 72:72/0, 72:72/1, 72:72/2
|
|
or any USA RANet Node.
|
|
In Europe: 73:73/0 ,73:73/1,73:73/2 or any RANet node.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
|
|
|
|
This Policy Statement may be amended by the International
|
|
Zone Coordnator or the Executive Board as a Unit when deemed
|
|
necessary. Your suggestions, comments and constructive
|
|
criticism are always welcome and should be addressed directly
|
|
to the RANet HeadQuarters, Or Zone Coordnator of your Zone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Revision: 1 January 1993, RNet_POL.003
|
|
RANEt HeadQuarters 72:72/0
|
|
|