mirror of
https://github.com/opsxcq/mirror-textfiles.com.git
synced 2025-08-06 14:17:02 +02:00
574 lines
27 KiB
Plaintext
574 lines
27 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
THE MOST COMMONLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT BUILDING ENCLOSURES
|
||
|
||
Many JBL users build their own loudspeaker enclosures. Their audio
|
||
skills range widely from novice to expert. From the thousands of
|
||
letters and calls we have received addressing the subject of
|
||
loudspeaker enclosure construction, we have determined the most common
|
||
questions and present the following Questions and Answers. The
|
||
particular questions listed attempt to answer as many questions as we
|
||
feel are necessary to provide enough information to build an enclosure
|
||
which will allow your JBL loudspeaker to operate to its potential. The
|
||
questions selected here concentrate on vented "bass reflex" enclosures,
|
||
since low frequency horns are fairly complex, and many good tested
|
||
designs exist. Also, it is often more econonomical to buy a bass horn
|
||
enclosure than to build one. Vented box enclosures are by far the most
|
||
popular enclosure type. Vented boxes are finding increasing use by
|
||
touring sound companies, displacing existing horn enclosure designs
|
||
because of the greater low frequency power output and extended low
|
||
frequency capability they offer when used in arrays. In addition to
|
||
their simple design requirements, vented loudspeaker enclosures offer
|
||
flexibility of design in shape, weight and component complement, and
|
||
usually produce the best results obtainable from modern loudspeaker
|
||
drivers at the lowest cost.
|
||
|
||
[1]
|
||
Q: What makes a good vented enclosure?
|
||
|
||
A: Basically, an enclosure serves to partition the front and rear of
|
||
the driver's cone, preventing the opposing air pressure changes
|
||
produced by cone motion from cancelling, and allowing the radiation of
|
||
sound from the front of the driver only. In addition, vented
|
||
enclosures allow the compressibility of the air inside the enclosure to
|
||
work as a more active part of the "system" consisting of driver and
|
||
enclosure. Beyond these two basic functions, a low frequency
|
||
loudspeaker enclosure should do absolutely nothing, that is, it should
|
||
add no effects of its own--no vibration, no tonality, no motion--
|
||
nothing to interfere with or absorb acoustic energy produced by the
|
||
driver.
|
||
|
||
[2]
|
||
Q: Is it possible to get low, punchy bass from a small enclosure?
|
||
|
||
A: Yes, if the driver in the enclosure is designed for low bass
|
||
operation in a small enclosure. Unfortunately, it's usually a small
|
||
driver that can work properly in a small enclosure, and that dictates
|
||
that lower sound levels will result from the small amount of air such a
|
||
small driver can move. Larger boxes (with larger bass drivers) produce
|
||
more bass, smaller boxes produce less bass. It's a fact of life, like
|
||
the fact that it takes a bass viol, a tuba, longer piano strings, or
|
||
very large organ pipes to produce bass energy in the air. Low bass
|
||
requires that more air move, and bigger boxes contain more air that can
|
||
be put to work making low bass.
|
||
|
||
[3]
|
||
Q: Can I get more bass from my enclosure by installing a bigger driver?
|
||
|
||
A: A given enclosure will not automatically produce more bass when a
|
||
larger driver is installed, in fact the opposite is often the result.
|
||
|
||
[4]
|
||
Q: What about putting two drivers in the enclosure to increase bass?
|
||
|
||
A: Placing two bass drivers in an enclosure designed for one will
|
||
usually produce less bass and more midrange output, and will upset the
|
||
operation of the driver-enclosure system because each driver will
|
||
behave as though it is installed in an enclosure which has only half
|
||
the internal volume of the original enclosure (with one driver).
|
||
|
||
[5]
|
||
Q: What should I do to use two drivers (for more bass)?
|
||
|
||
A: There are two alternative possibilities. When using two identical
|
||
drivers, you can build an enclosure with twice the internal volume of
|
||
the original enclosure that contained one driver, or you can duplicate
|
||
the original enclosure and stack the two. As the latter alternative
|
||
suggests, when building the double enclosure, it's necessary to treat
|
||
the enclosure as if it were two enclosures--you must double the porting
|
||
used on the single smaller enclosure--although it is not necessary to
|
||
divide the volume of the double enclosure unless two different driver
|
||
models (e.g. E130 and E155) are used and their interaction would be
|
||
undesirable. A usable example of this might be a 227 liter (8 cubic
|
||
foot) enclosure divided into two chambers so that the E130 occupies 57
|
||
liters (2 cubic feet) and the E155 occupies 170 liters (6 cubic feet).
|
||
In this case, the ports tuning either chamber to the same desired
|
||
frequency will be quite different.
|
||
|
||
[6]
|
||
Q: What does port or enclosure "tuning" mean?
|
||
|
||
A: In exactly the same way the resonant note from a bottle can be
|
||
raised and lowered by adding or pouring out liquid to change the
|
||
bottle's air volume, enclosure tuning is affected by the ratio of air
|
||
volumes in the port (the bottleneck) with its attendant flow
|
||
resistance, and the enclosure interior volume. Tuning of loudspeaker
|
||
enclosures is a result of manipulating the differences in effective air
|
||
mass between the enclosure interior and the air in the port. The
|
||
bottle-like nature of a vented enclosure is known as a "Helmholtz
|
||
resonator." The ports or ducts in a vented enclosure work only over a
|
||
narrow band of frequencies near the chosen tuned frequency, producing
|
||
the same effect noted when blowing across a bottleneck--a single
|
||
distinct pitch.
|
||
|
||
[7]
|
||
Q: Is it always necessary to use a port for good bass?
|
||
|
||
A: JBL uses vented enclosure designs because they are superior to
|
||
sealed enclosure designs in several important ways--as long as it is
|
||
possible to tightly control the loudspeaker driver parameters in
|
||
manufacturing as JBL does. Vented designs produce lower distortion at
|
||
the lowest operating frequencies, afford the driver protection against
|
||
mechanically destructive large cone excursion, and better enable the
|
||
driver to absorb and utilize its full power rating from an amplifier
|
||
when operating at low frequencies. It is important to keep in mind
|
||
that porting and tuning an enclosure provides air loading for the bass
|
||
driver down to frequencies just below the Helmholtz frequency, but does
|
||
not provide any loading for the driver at frequencies below that, such
|
||
as subsonic turntable rumble, record warp or microphone wind pickup.
|
||
If you intend to operate a sound system at high power levels, we highly
|
||
recommend an electronic high-pass filter to eliminate subsonic input to
|
||
the power amplifier(s). This will substantially increase the available
|
||
useful power from the amplifier which will then only operate in the
|
||
audible frequency range. Such a filter is the UREI model 501 Sub Sonic
|
||
Processor, or the built-in sub-sonic switches of the JBL Electronic
|
||
Frequency Dividing Network model 5234A.
|
||
|
||
[8]
|
||
Q: Where should I locate the port(s) with respect to the woofer?
|
||
|
||
A: Bass reflex enclosures are usually designed to tune from about 100
|
||
hertz and down. The length of sound waves at these low frequencies is
|
||
over 11 feet, so port placement is not critical. Ports may be located
|
||
anywhere on the baffle with no change in bass performance; some designs
|
||
even locate ports on the back of the enclosure which works well as long
|
||
as the enclosure is not close to a wall (a couple of port diameters
|
||
away) and there is an unobstructed air path between the woofer and the
|
||
port. Overall, it's safest to locate the port somewhere on the baffle
|
||
with the woofer(s) far enough away from side walls to avoid interaction
|
||
between port and enclosure wall or the fiberglass insulation on the
|
||
wall.
|
||
|
||
[9]
|
||
Q: What should the ducts be made of? Is round better than rectangular?
|
||
|
||
A: Port ducts may be made of anything rigid, such as paper cardboard
|
||
with about a 1.5 mm (1/16") or larger wall thickness. They can be any
|
||
shape, square or rectangular (such that port area remains constant) and
|
||
made of wood or other suitable material. It is not necessary to use
|
||
PVC pipe for port tubing, particularly when most carpet stores throw
|
||
away large amounts of heavy carboard tubing of between 3 and 4-1/2
|
||
inches inside diameter.
|
||
|
||
[10]
|
||
Q: What is the relationship of duct length to port area?
|
||
|
||
A: When port area is increased, independently of other factors,
|
||
enclosure tuning is raised. If duct length is increased, independently
|
||
of other factors, enclosure tuning is lowered. To keep the same tuning
|
||
(Helmholtz frequency) you will need to increase duct length as you
|
||
increase port area.
|
||
|
||
[11]
|
||
Q: How big should the port be?
|
||
|
||
A: The bigger, the better. Any port causes some resistance to air
|
||
movement, and so introduces unavoidable losses in output to the system
|
||
as a whole. The ratios of port area and length and enclosure volume
|
||
determine the Helmholtz frequency tuning. Mechanical reactance
|
||
elements, stiffness and air mass, control the effective air mass
|
||
ratios. At very low operating levels, where air in the port does not
|
||
move very fast, a small short port will behave the same as a large
|
||
longer port as far as enclosure tuning is concerned. At high power
|
||
levels however, the restricted air flow of the smaller port will
|
||
produce output level losses, some de-tuning and at high enough levels a
|
||
small port will cause the enclosure to behave like a sealed enclosure
|
||
with little or no contribution from the port. To minimize resistive
|
||
losses, the largest practical port should be used. Computer listings
|
||
of port choices calculated to limit air velocity inside the port duct
|
||
will list duct sizes which are normally impractical. A 380 mm (15 in)
|
||
diameter port is not an unreasonable choice for a 380 mm bass driver,
|
||
however the necessary length would dictate that such a port might
|
||
itself have a volume of many cubic feet, sometimes equal to or larger
|
||
than the original enclosure. A good rule of thumb would be to avoid
|
||
ports whose circular area is smaller than at least 1/3 the diameter of
|
||
the driver such as a 127 mm (5 in) diameter port for a 380 mm (15 in)
|
||
driver. This will usually provide sufficient port area so that the
|
||
port will not "whistle" when the system is operated at high power
|
||
levels near the helmholtz frequency--a sure indication of severe system
|
||
losses and potential power compression and low-frequency output
|
||
limiting.
|
||
|
||
[12]
|
||
Q: Can I use several smaller ports instead of one big one?
|
||
|
||
A: Yes, however there is a phenomenon associated with air resistance
|
||
resulting from air drag on the internal surfaces of port ducts and
|
||
turbulence at the ends of the ports that requires a duct length
|
||
correction when several ports are used. For example, when using four
|
||
100 mm (4 in) tubes instead of one 200 mm (8 in) tube (which has the
|
||
same port area but one-quarter the internal surface area), the length
|
||
needed will be slightly less than that needed for the single 200 mm
|
||
tube, perhaps 5% to 10% less, depending on overall enclosure volume.
|
||
These effects exhibited by port ducts is exaggerated by proximity of
|
||
the duct to enclosure interior surfaces or any other type of boundary
|
||
that may cause air turbulence near the end of the duct, therefore it's
|
||
important to keep duct ends away from the rear of the cabinet or other
|
||
obstructions by an amount at least equivalent to or larger than the
|
||
dimension across the port. If you are using a rectangular port that
|
||
has as one of its sides, an enclosure wall, you might have to use some
|
||
correction.
|
||
|
||
[13]
|
||
Q: Is there a simple mathematical way of designing proper enclosures?
|
||
|
||
A: Yes, a JBL scientist, D.B. Keele Jr., simplified the work of A.
|
||
Neville Thiele and Dr. Richard Small so that anyone with a pocket
|
||
calculator and a ruler or straight edge can design the right enclosure
|
||
volume and choose the right port or duct for a given loudspeaker
|
||
driver. JBL offers, at no cost, a four-page "kit" containing detailed
|
||
step by step instructions, written specifically for non-mathematicians,
|
||
showing how to use published Thiele-Small driver parameters in
|
||
enclosure design. Examples are shown with their results graphically
|
||
represented. An enclosure design flow chart and enclosure venting
|
||
nomograph are included.
|
||
|
||
[14]
|
||
Q: Should the enclosure's baffle be removable?
|
||
|
||
A: This is a question of mechanical strength and rigidity. All
|
||
enclosures, particularly those intended for rough portable use, should
|
||
be constructed with all sides permanently fixed by glue and screws, and
|
||
sealed air-tight by virtue of well cut and glued joints. It is
|
||
preferable to mount loudspeakers from the front of the baffle board to
|
||
eliminate the possiblity of reflections from the inside of the
|
||
loudspeaker mounting hole, thus it becomes unnecessary to provide for
|
||
removing the baffle. Woofer openings are usually large enough to reach
|
||
through in order to work inside the box, for example, to install other
|
||
components.
|
||
|
||
[15]
|
||
Q: Is there a preferred shape for loudspeaker enclosures?
|
||
|
||
A: There are a number of shapes that improve performance and some that
|
||
cause distinct degradation in performance. For single, full-range
|
||
drivers (e.g. JBL's LE8T) a sphere is the ideal shape for an enclosure
|
||
because the curved surfaces avoid the diffraction effects of cabinet
|
||
edges, which bend sound waves in a manner dependent on frequency. For
|
||
multi-way loudspeaker systems, spheres are usually impractical because
|
||
of the large size needed and because of the precise orientation
|
||
required for optimal listening. Conventional enclosures work best
|
||
mounted flush into a wall where diffraction is controlled by virtue of
|
||
the wall surface, and for free-standing enclosures, tilting, angled and
|
||
curving surfaces may be employed to help reduce or control edge
|
||
diffraction. The overall shape of the enclosure is relatively
|
||
unimportant except where the shape makes it difficult to build a rigid
|
||
enclosure. It is best to avoid enclosure dimensions that are multiples
|
||
of each other, such as 1 X 2 X 4 ratios, and strive to use dimensions
|
||
that have somewhat unrelated ratios such as 1 X 1.23 X 1.41.
|
||
|
||
[16]
|
||
Q: What is the best material to use for building enclosures?
|
||
|
||
A: For home and permanent installation use, high density particle wood
|
||
is the most cost-effective material for general enclosure construction.
|
||
The best wood to use for portable enclosure construction is 14 to 20
|
||
ply per inch Finland birch type. Birch plywood is very expensive
|
||
however, and a carefully braced enclosure made of high grade void-free
|
||
fir plywood can do the job just as well in most cases. The thicker you
|
||
can make the cabinet walls, the better the results will be because of
|
||
reduced wall vibration and resonance, but the tradeoff is cost and
|
||
weight. Enclosure walls should be cut so that edges form an air-tight
|
||
seal when glued together. Cleats and caulking can also be used if
|
||
needed to insure a good fit and tight air seal.
|
||
|
||
[17]
|
||
Q: Is bracing necessary? How much should be used?
|
||
|
||
A: Bracing should be added to the enclosure interior to minimize
|
||
enclosure wall vibration. Enclosure walls simply cannot be stiff
|
||
enough since wall vibration indicates that energy is being wasted to
|
||
move enclosure panels rather than moving air. 25 X 76 mm (1 X 3 in)
|
||
pine bracing fixed on edge with glue and screws to the enclosure walls
|
||
will help provide the minimum necessary stiffening without affecting
|
||
the internal volume significantly. If you are building large subwoofer
|
||
enclosures, bracing with two-by-fours works better, though you should
|
||
take the bracing volume into account since a 3 m (10-foot) length takes
|
||
up 12.9 liters (0.36 cubic foot) of enclosure volume.
|
||
|
||
[18]
|
||
Q: How should I mount drivers on the baffle?
|
||
|
||
A: Mount drivers on the front of the baffle whenever possible to avoid
|
||
the reflections from inside the mounting hole. Heavy drivers should
|
||
normally be front-mounted using Tee-nuts and machine screws or JBL's
|
||
MA15 clamps. If Tee-nuts are used, apply a bit of Bostic or Pliobond
|
||
type rubber glue to the inside of the nut flange to help avoid losing
|
||
the Tee-nut inside the enclosure when installing the driver. Baffle
|
||
board construction is much easier if all baffle parts are assembled
|
||
prior to final box assembly.
|
||
|
||
[19]
|
||
Q: Do I need fiberglass inside the enclosure?
|
||
|
||
A: JBL uses a 25 mm (1 in) padding of 1/2-pound density fiberglass
|
||
stapled to the enclosure interior on all surfaces except the baffle.
|
||
You should use 100 mm (4 in) thick dacron or 25 mm (1 in) fiberglass on
|
||
at least three of the surfaces of parallel interior walls. Keep sound
|
||
absorbing materials away from the port(s) as the air velocity inside
|
||
the port can be sufficient to tear off bits of the material and squirt
|
||
them out of the enclosure. It is not necessary to cover the inside of
|
||
the baffle, but doing so will rarely degrade system performance. The
|
||
enclosure exterior may be covered with your choice of any suitable
|
||
finish or decoration; this will not affect bass performance and in some
|
||
cases (as with Formica) may help stiffen the enclosure walls.
|
||
|
||
[20]
|
||
Q: Does Fiberglass significantly affect enclosure tuning?
|
||
|
||
A: No, not unless the enclosure is stuffed full of fiberglass, in which
|
||
case the apparent volume of the enclosure increases by 12% to 20% as
|
||
seen from the point of view of the bass driver. Stuffing the enclosure
|
||
full with fiberglass is not recommended because it introduces system
|
||
losses, is expensive and interferes with port operation. The exception
|
||
to this would be a sealed "air suspension" type system enclosure where
|
||
more virtual volume is needed and actual volume is not available,
|
||
and/or where box dimensions which are multiples of each other can't be
|
||
avoided and the fiberglass stuffing will help absorb the internal sound
|
||
reflections.
|
||
|
||
[21]
|
||
Q: What is needed to mount a midrange on the baffle with the woofer?
|
||
|
||
A: For cone-type midrange drivers, a sealed sub-chamber should be used
|
||
to prevent interaction with the enclosure's bass driver. JBL drivers
|
||
suitable for sealed-chamber midrange use require only 10 to 40 liters
|
||
(.3 to 1.0 cubic foot) of chamber volume to operate at typical midrange
|
||
frequencies, above 200 hertz. Subchambers should be constructed
|
||
solidly and liberally lined with fiberglass. As in the case of
|
||
enclosure shapes, avoiding multiples of dimensions, subchambers should
|
||
be built so as to avoid square and cube shapes in favor of non-related
|
||
numerical ratios.
|
||
|
||
[22]
|
||
Q: Is there any special procedure for mounting a horn in an enclosure?
|
||
|
||
A: Use of a horn/compression driver does not require any subchamber
|
||
since these devices form their own air-tight seal. JBL horns such as
|
||
the 2344, 2370, MI-291 and 2380 horn family also seal their own cutout
|
||
opening in the enclosure when properly mounted on the baffle. Better
|
||
compression drivers are quite heavy, so a brace should be provided to
|
||
cradle the driver to prevent driver movement during shipping. In
|
||
combination with the length of a horn as a lever, driver mass can cause
|
||
the assembly to tear off the baffle or break the horn if the enclosure
|
||
is handled roughly or dropped. Driver mass can also tear off the horn
|
||
throat if cabinets are dropped on their backs.
|
||
|
||
|
||
CONVERSION CONSTANTS and USEFUL DATA
|
||
____________________________________
|
||
|
||
|
||
LITERS FEET^3 INCHES^3 METERS^3 MILLIMETERS INCHES METERS
|
||
___________________________________ _____________________________
|
||
1.00 = .03531 = 61.0 = .001 1.00 = .039 = .001
|
||
28.32 = 1.00 = 1,728 = .02832 25.40 = 1.000 = .0254
|
||
1000.00 = 35.31 = 61,016 = 1.00 1000.00 = 39.370 = 1.000
|
||
|
||
TO FIND SOUND WAVE LENGTH: divide velocity of sound by frequency (Hz)
|
||
(SOUND VELOCITY = 344 m/s, 1130 ft/s or 13,560 in/s)
|
||
|
||
AREA OF CIRCLE = 3.14 x (radius squared) Note: radius = 1/2 diameter
|
||
|
||
TO FIND THE DIAMETER OF A CIRCLE WITH EQUIVALENT AREA:
|
||
2 x square-root of (area divided by 3.14)
|
||
example: area of 9" tube = area of 8" square duct calculated:
|
||
(area) 64/3.14=20.37, square root = 4.51 x 2 = 9.03 (diameter)
|
||
|
||
VOLUME OF CYLINDRICAL DUCT = circular area x length
|
||
|
||
VOLUME DISPLACED BY JBL LOUDSPEAKERS: 8" = .05 cu ft, 10" = .1 cu ft,
|
||
12" = .15 cu ft, 15" = .2 cu ft, 18" = .3 cu ft.
|
||
|
||
JBL LOUDSPEAKER MOUNTING HOLE AND BOLT CIRCLE DIMENSIONS:
|
||
mounting holes:
|
||
8" = 7-1/16" 10" = 9" 12" = 11-1/16" 15" = 13-31/32"
|
||
18" = 16-13/16"
|
||
|
||
bolt circles:
|
||
8" = 7-5/8" 10" = 9-3/4" 12" = 11-9/16" 15" = 14-9/16"
|
||
18" = 17-3/8"
|
||
|
||
|
||
BIBLIOGRAPHY of RECOMMENDED AUDIO REFERENCES
|
||
____________________________________________
|
||
|
||
FOR AUDIO NOVICES:
|
||
|
||
BOOKS:
|
||
|
||
David B. Weems, "Building Speaker Enclosures," Radio Shack
|
||
publication, stock# 62-2309
|
||
|
||
"The CAMEO Dictionary of Creative Audio Terms," Creative Audio & Music
|
||
Electronics Organization, 10 Delmar Avenue, Framingham, MA 01701
|
||
|
||
F. Alton Everest, "The Complete Handbook of Public Address Sound
|
||
Systems," Tab Books #966, Tab Books, Blue Ridge Summit, PA 17214
|
||
|
||
David B. Weems, "Designing, Building & Testing Your Own Speaker
|
||
System," Tab Books #1364 (this is the same as the Weems book above)
|
||
|
||
Abraham B. Cohen, "Hi-Fi Loudspeakers and Enclosures," Hayden Book Co.,
|
||
0721
|
||
|
||
Alex Badmaieff and Don Davis, "How to Build Speaker Enclosures," Howard
|
||
W. Sams & Co., Inc., 4300 West 62nd Street, Indianapolis, IN 46268
|
||
|
||
Bob Heil, "Practical Guide for Concert Sound," Sound Publishing Co.,
|
||
156 East 37th Street, New York, NY 10016
|
||
|
||
PAPERS:
|
||
|
||
Drew Daniels, "The Most Commonly Asked Questions About Building
|
||
Enclosures," JBL Professional, 8500 Balboa Blvd., Northridge CA, 91329
|
||
|
||
Drew Daniels, "Using the enclosure design flow chart," JBL
|
||
Professional, 8500 Balboa Blvd., Northridge, CA 91329
|
||
|
||
FOR EXPERIENCED AUDIO PRACTITIONERS AND HOBBYISTS:
|
||
|
||
BOOKS:
|
||
|
||
Jens Trampe Broch, "Acoustic Noise Measurement," Bruel & Kjaer
|
||
Instruments, Inc., 185 Forest Street, Marlborough, MA 01752 (617) 481-
|
||
7000
|
||
|
||
Howard M. Tremaine, "The Audio Cyclopedia," 2nd Edition 1969, Howard W.
|
||
Sams & Co., Inc., 4300 West 62nd Street, Indianapolis, IN 46268
|
||
|
||
Arnold P. Peterson and Ervin E. Gross, Jr., "Handbook of Noise
|
||
Measurement," General Radio, 300 Baker Avenue, Concord, MA 01742
|
||
|
||
Martin Colloms, "High Performance Loudspeakers," A Halstead Press Book,
|
||
1978 John Wiley and Sons, New York and Toronto.
|
||
|
||
Harry F. Olson, "Modern Sound Reproduction," 1972, Van Nostrand
|
||
Reinhold Co., New York.
|
||
|
||
Harry F. Olson, "Music Physics and Engineering," Dover Publications,
|
||
180 Varick Street, New York, NY 10014
|
||
|
||
Don and Carolyn Davis, "Sound System Engineering," Howard W. Sams &
|
||
Co., Inc., 4300 West 62nd Street, Indianapolis, IN 46268
|
||
|
||
F. Alton Everest, "Successful Sound System Operation," Tab Books #2606,
|
||
Tab Books, Blue Ridge Summit, PA 17214
|
||
|
||
PAPERS:
|
||
|
||
Drew Daniels, "Notes on 70-volt and distributed system presentation,"
|
||
for the National Sound Contractors Association Convention, September
|
||
10, 1985, JBL Professional, 8500 Balboa Blvd., Northridge, CA 91329
|
||
|
||
Drew Daniels, "Thiele-Small Nuts and Bolts with Painless Math,"
|
||
presented at the 70th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society,
|
||
November 1981 AES preprint number 1802(C8).
|
||
|
||
FOR ENGINEERS:
|
||
|
||
BOOKS:
|
||
|
||
Harry F. Olson, "Acoustical Engineering," D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc.,
|
||
250 4th Street, New York 3, NY 1957 (out of print)
|
||
|
||
Leo L. Beranek, "Acoustics," Mc Graw-Hill Book Co., New York 1954.
|
||
|
||
Harry F. Olson, "Elements of Acoustical Engineering," D. Van Nostrand
|
||
Co., Inc., 250 4th Street, New York 3, NY (1st ed., 1940, 2nd ed., 1947
|
||
both out of print)
|
||
|
||
Lawrence E. Kinsler and Austin R. Frey, "Fundamentals of Acoustics,"
|
||
John Wiley and Sons, New York and Toronto.
|
||
|
||
N.W. McLachlan, "Loudspeakers: Theory Performance, Testing and Design,
|
||
Oxford Engineering Science Series, Oxford at The Clarendon Press 1934,
|
||
Corrected Edition, Dover Publications 1960.
|
||
|
||
PAPERS:
|
||
|
||
Don B. Keele, Jr., "AWASP: An Acoustic Wave Analysis and Simulation
|
||
Program," presented at the 60th AES Convention in Los Angeles, May
|
||
1978.
|
||
|
||
Fancher M. Murray, "An Application of Bob Smith's Phasing Plug,"
|
||
presented at the 61st AES Convention in New York, November 1978.
|
||
|
||
Don B. Keele Jr., "Automated Loudspeaker Polar Response Measurements
|
||
Under Microcomputer Control," presented at the 65th AES Convention in
|
||
London, February 1980.
|
||
|
||
R.H. Small, "Direct-Radiator Loudspeaker System Analysis," Journal of
|
||
the Audio Engineering Society (JAES), Vol. 20, p. 383, June 1972.
|
||
|
||
Mark R. Gander, "Ground Plane Acoustic Measurement of Loudspeaker
|
||
Systems," presented at the 66th AES Convention in Los Angeles, May
|
||
1980.
|
||
|
||
"Loudspeakers," An anthology of articles on loudspeakers from the pages
|
||
of the Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, Vol. 1 through Vol. 25
|
||
(1953-1977). Available from the Audio Engineering Society, 60 East
|
||
42nd Street, New York, NY 10165 Telephone (212) 661-8528
|
||
|
||
A.N. Thiele, "Loudspeakers in Vented Boxes," Proceedings of the IREE
|
||
Australia, Vol. 22, p. 487 August 1961; republished in the JAES, vol.
|
||
19, p. 382 May 1971 and p. 471 June 1971.
|
||
|
||
Fancher M. Murray, "The Motional Impedance of an Electro-Dynamic
|
||
Loudspeaker," presented at the 98th Meeting of the Acoustical Society
|
||
of America, November 19, 1979.
|
||
|
||
Mark R. Gander, "Moving-Coil Loudspeaker Topology As An Indicator of
|
||
Linear Excursion Capability," presented at the 64th AES Convention in
|
||
New York, November 1979.
|
||
|
||
Garry Margolis and John C. Young, "A Personal Calculator Program for
|
||
Low Frequency Horn Design Using Thiele-Small Driver Parameters,"
|
||
presented at the 62nd AES Convention in Brussels, March 1979.
|
||
|
||
Garry Margolis and Richard H. Small, "Personal Calculator Programs for
|
||
Approximate Vented-Box and Closed-Box Loudspeaker System Design,"
|
||
presented at the 66th AES Convention in Los Angeles, May 1980.
|
||
|
||
Fancher M. Murray and Howard M. Durbin, "Three Dimensional Diaphragm
|
||
Suspensions for Compression Drivers," presented at the 63rd AES
|
||
Convention in Los Angeles, March 1979.
|
||
|
||
R.H. Small, "Vented-Box Loudspeaker Systems," Journal of the Audio
|
||
Engineering Society, Vol. 21, p. 363 June 1973, p. 438 July/August
|
||
1973, p. 549 September 1973, and p. 635 October 1973.
|
||
|
||
JBL TECHNICAL NOTES:
|
||
|
||
The following are available at no cost from JBL Professional:
|
||
|
||
Vol. 1, No. 1 - "Performance Parameters of JBL Low-Frequency Systems"
|
||
|
||
Vol. 1, No. 2 - "70-Volt Distribution Systems Using JBL Industrial
|
||
Series Loudspeakers"
|
||
|
||
Vol. 1, No. 3 - "Choosing JBL Low-Frequency Transducers"
|
||
|
||
Vol. 1, No. 4 - "Constant Directivity Horns"
|
||
|
||
Vol. 1, No. 5 - "Field Network Modifications for Flat Power Response
|
||
Applications"
|
||
|
||
Vol. 1, No. 6 - "JBL High-frequency Directional Data in Isobar Form"
|
||
|
||
Vol. 1, No. 7 - "In-Line Stacked Arrays of Flat-front Bi-Radial Horns"
|
||
|
||
Vol. 1, No. 8 - "Characteristics of High-Frequency Compression Drivers"
|
||
|
||
Vol. 1, No. 9 - "Distortion and Power Compression in Low-frequency
|
||
Transducers"
|
||
|
||
Vol. 1, No. 10- "Use Of The 4612OK, 4671OK, And 4660 Systems In Fixed
|
||
Installation Sound Reinforcement"
|
||
|
||
Vol. 2, No. 2 - "JBL/UREI Power Amplifier Design Philosophy"
|
||
|
||
Instruction Manual - "Motion Picture Loudspeaker Systems: A Guide to
|
||
Proper Selection And Installation"
|
||
|
||
"JBL Sound System Design Reference Manual" ($15)
|
||
|