mirror of
https://github.com/opsxcq/mirror-textfiles.com.git
synced 2025-08-19 14:41:48 +02:00
3132 lines
168 KiB
Plaintext
3132 lines
168 KiB
Plaintext
|
|
ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛÛÝ ÞÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÞÛÛÛÛÛÛÝÛÛÛÛÛÝ
|
|
ÍÍÍÞÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÍÞÛÛ ÛÛÛÍÞÛÛ ÛÛÝÞÛÝÞÛÛ ÛÛÛÍÞÛÛ ÍÍÍÍ ÛÛÜÜÜ ÍÍÍÍÍÞÛÝÛÛÝ ÞÛÝÞÛÛÝÍÍÍÍÍÍ
|
|
ÍÍÍÍÛÛÝ ÛÛÛÍÛÛÝÛÛÛÛÍÛÛÝÞÛÛÍÛÛÍÛÛÝÛÛÛÛÍÛÛÝÍßÛÛÝÞÛÝßßßÍÍÍÍÍÍÛÛÞÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛÝ ÍÍÍÍÍ
|
|
ÞÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÞÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÞÛÛ ÛÛÝÞÛÝÞÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÞÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÝÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÝÞÛÝÛÛÝ ÞÛÝÞÛÛÛÛÛÝÛÛÝ
|
|
"The name speaks for itself!" ÞÝ
|
|
|
|
Presents the
|
|
|
|
Damage, INC. Newsletter
|
|
|
|
October 1998 Issue #12.
|
|
|
|
"Armed and Dangerous."
|
|
|
|
ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
|
|
C O N T E N T S :
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ INTRODUCTION - An Introduction to the Damage, INC. Newsletter.
|
|
|
|
þ BIG BROTHER BASHING - Big Brother uses technology against you.
|
|
¯ Search String: {BIG BROTHER}
|
|
|
|
þ BLACKENED'S TIP OF THE MONTH - Hacking local systems.
|
|
¯ Search String: {BLACKENED}
|
|
|
|
þ BREAKER'S REVIEWS - H/P and Security Web Site Reviews.
|
|
¯ Search String: {REVIEWS}
|
|
|
|
þ CONSPIRACIES AND COVERUPS - NWO Part 3: U.S. Concentration Camps.
|
|
¯ Search String: {COVERUPS}
|
|
|
|
þ CORRUPTION AND GREED - Bill C-68; Corrupt and Oppressive Gun Control.
|
|
¯ Search String: {GREED}
|
|
|
|
þ CROSSED WIRES - Infinite Darkness Advertisement.
|
|
¯ Search String: {WIRES}
|
|
|
|
þ DRUGS DISCUSSION - THC content and meaning.
|
|
¯ Search String: {DRUGS}
|
|
|
|
þ H/P INFORMATION AND NEWS - How to hax0r your Modem and Conferencing.
|
|
¯ Search String: {H/P}
|
|
|
|
þ INTERVIEWS AND INTERROGATIONS - An interview with Fringe.
|
|
¯ Search String: {INTERVIEWS}
|
|
|
|
þ LETTERS TO THE EDITOR - More feedback about the Damage, INC. Newsletter.
|
|
¯ Search String: {LETTERS}
|
|
|
|
þ OBJECTIVE OPINIONS - Gun Control = No Control.
|
|
¯ Search String: {OPINIONS}
|
|
|
|
þ REPORTS FROM THE FRONT - Several opinionated articles on firearms.
|
|
¯ Search String: {REPORTS}
|
|
|
|
þ SOURCE AND SCRIPTS - Domain Scanner v2.0
|
|
¯ Search String: {SOURCE}
|
|
|
|
þ THC PHREAK'S TOP TEN LIST - Self-Defense Weapons.
|
|
¯ Search String: {TOP TEN}
|
|
|
|
þ THOUGHTS, POEMS AND CREATIVE WRITING - "A pathetic zombie race."
|
|
¯ Search String: {WRITING}
|
|
|
|
þ CLOSING COMMENTS - BLACKENED's Deadly Closing Comments.
|
|
¯ Search String: {CLOSING}
|
|
|
|
ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
|
|
|
|
|
|
< DISCLAIMER >
|
|
|
|
All articles contained in the Damage, INC. Newsletter are for informational
|
|
purposes only. Damage, INC. is not responsible for how any of the information
|
|
presented is used. It is not intended to be a manual with instructions to be
|
|
followed. We won't be held responsible for any damages caused, illegal acts
|
|
committed etc. by our readers. If/how you use the information given is entirely
|
|
up to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
< COPYRIGHT NOTICE >
|
|
|
|
All articles and source code contained within this file are (C) Copyright by
|
|
Damage, INC. (unless stated otherwise). No part of this work can be modified,
|
|
reproduced or changed in any way without the expressed written consent of
|
|
Damage, INC. That means, electronically or otherwise, in part or in whole
|
|
this file must not be altered. It cannot be included with any other releases.
|
|
You cannot claim that you wrote it, or alter any articles and source code that
|
|
has been written and Copyrighted by us. Also, do *not* distribute any
|
|
Damage, INC. releases in "packages" with other text files or utilities. They
|
|
must only be distributed alone in their present, original form. You are
|
|
permitted to read and distribute the Damage, INC. Newsletter freely to quality
|
|
h/p boards only.
|
|
|
|
Copyright 1998 by Damage, INC.
|
|
All Rights Reserved.
|
|
_______________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION: It's now October 1998. It's the 12th issue. We've managed
|
|
to survive an entire year of writing and releasing issues of
|
|
the Damage, INC. Newsletter! ;) Sure, we've experienced our
|
|
fair share of difficulties. We have also encountered several
|
|
obstacles along the way. However, nothing that's worthwhile is
|
|
without its problems.
|
|
|
|
In order to 'celebrate' issue #12, we have included more hollow
|
|
point ammunition, DU rounds, high capacity magazines, night
|
|
vision goggles, laser targetted scopes, fragmentation grenades,
|
|
high explosive cluster bombs, laser/satellite guided Tomahawk
|
|
cruise missiles, an assortment of smart bombs and of course,
|
|
nukes galore. Indeed, we're armed to the teeth and extremely
|
|
dangerous. So, put on your best suit of kevlar body armour, jump
|
|
in your re-enforced concrete bunker, drink a few cold beers,
|
|
light up a fat joint and remember to watch CNN for complete live
|
|
coverage of the fireworks because this issue is fully loaded and
|
|
action packed...
|
|
|
|
Translation: We've included more articles, more information,
|
|
clipped out the filler, exposed the truth, targeted ignorance,
|
|
waged war against corruption and are going to nuke 'em all. So,
|
|
prepare yourselves for a kick ass issue that's interesting,
|
|
creative and informative. ;)
|
|
|
|
In case you haven't detected it by my comments, this is a
|
|
theme issue. Obviously, the quote "Armed and Dangerous"
|
|
isn't meaningless... or just there to attract the attention
|
|
of readers. Information is dangerous. It's potent. It is
|
|
a powerful weapon to possess. Arm yourselves with it by
|
|
becoming informed about all that interests you. It's time
|
|
to fill up your clips with bullets, lock and load. As in,
|
|
open your mind, nourish your brain, use the knowledge and
|
|
information that's stored. Simply using your brain for a basic
|
|
Input/Output data storage device isn't enough. Awaken and
|
|
enlighten yourselves. Develop your mind and reap the rewards
|
|
that it gives you. There's so much to uncover, reveal, explore,
|
|
discover and learn. That's what is so amazing. There are no
|
|
absolutes and no limits... just possibilities. You can *never*
|
|
think about too many things or think too much. Just as, you
|
|
*can't* learn or know too much. That's why it's such a slow,
|
|
ongoing process. And h/p is no different. Therefore, if you
|
|
want to advance, you must continue to do the things that I
|
|
mentioned above... and pursue your goals. It's not quick and
|
|
easy. It's not about downloading programs/tools/utilities that
|
|
'hack/phreak' for you either. It's more like a long, strenuous
|
|
journey of gathering knowledge, wisdom and experience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BIG BROTHER BASHING - {BIG BROTHER}
|
|
Big Brother uses technology against you.
|
|
|
|
Have you ever been involved in a conversation with a person that is truly naive
|
|
when it comes to technology in general? In my experiences, it is not a very
|
|
enlightening conversation to say the least. Many naive people that I know have
|
|
been influenced by Big Brother's propaganda. The most dangerous lie that they
|
|
tend to believe is that "all technology is good." Such a broad claim is
|
|
extremely ignorant and dangerous. It causes them to have a false sense of
|
|
security and misleads them into optimistically believing that the future will
|
|
be better due to new technological advancements. Obviously, that doesn't have
|
|
to be the case and that it can work both ways. All intelligent people should
|
|
know that technology can be used to benefit *and* harm people.
|
|
|
|
It is such ignorance of technology that Big Brother promotes and relies on.
|
|
Afterall, making sure that people are ignorant only strengthens Big Brother's
|
|
control and power over the naive, gullible masses. To Big Brother, an
|
|
uninformed population is extremely easy to spy on... with little chance of
|
|
being detected. They're like a hungry wolf in an open field of sheep. Easy
|
|
prey. In this article, we will look at how Big Brother, with the total
|
|
cooperation of Bell, is using the telephone system to spy on the citizens of
|
|
"free" nations. As advances in telephone and computer technologies occur at a
|
|
fantastic rate, so does Big Brother's ability to invade and destroy our right
|
|
to have private telephone conversations and transmissions.
|
|
|
|
For many decades, Big Brother has wanted to be able to randomly scan the entire
|
|
telephone system, searching for "thought crimes." Up until this decade, it has
|
|
been impossible because of the vast quantity of people that access the country
|
|
wide telephone system at any one time. Even in Communist Russia, the KGB
|
|
couldn't watch and listen to every telephone conversation, although they tried
|
|
their best by heavily bugging the Soviet telephone system. The same is true of
|
|
the CIA, FBI, CSIS, etc. They've desperately wanted to help Big Brother root
|
|
out "thought crimes," but their technology was lacking. Back then, spying on
|
|
citizens using the telco on a massive scale was only a pipe dream, instead of
|
|
an achievable objective or a reality.
|
|
|
|
As I mentioned above, times have changed. In a sense, their technological
|
|
dreams have come true. Their goals can now be reached... and spying objectives
|
|
realized. Almost gone are the days of limited voice and data taps on individual
|
|
lines. Voice recognition technology can give Big Brother the ability to monitor
|
|
all citizens that use the telephone system for voice conversations. Currently,
|
|
independent businesses have claimed to be able to create software that will give
|
|
computers the ability to understand words instantly (no training required, like
|
|
home computer voice recognition software). When certain words are said, the
|
|
software can be instructed to react by executing a command, subroutine, etc.
|
|
And with the further development of AI (Artificial Intelligence), who knows
|
|
how far the "intelligence community" will be able to go. I won't even begin
|
|
to speculate, since their ability to invade privacy will be unimaginable.
|
|
|
|
To further prove my point, I will tell you about Votan, a corporation in
|
|
Pleasanton, California. Votan has created a VMS that can be operated by voice
|
|
command. No touch-tone telephone required. Voice recognition, telephone and
|
|
computer technology have been successfully merged. The user's commands are
|
|
understood using voice recognition software and then executed. This is what Big
|
|
Brother has been waiting for. It's basically an evolution of the early voice
|
|
recognition systems/software. With Big Brother's resources, he can create a
|
|
massive voice conversation monitoring system to search for "thought crimes"
|
|
across the entire telephone system. Think about that for a second. It's a
|
|
terrifying thought, isn't it?
|
|
|
|
Imagine talking about "handguns" to a friend during a telephone conversation.
|
|
Big Brother's monitoring system happens to be listening in on your line during
|
|
the system's random line scanning. The word "handgun" could trigger a small
|
|
subroutine in Big Bro's software that would immediately start recording your
|
|
conversation. If you are a phreak that diverts, you could still be caught
|
|
eventually because Big Brother would have your voice print on record. (Unless
|
|
you use a voice changer all of the time... or find a way to disable their voice
|
|
recognition... a backdoor through it etc.) It could be matched to future
|
|
"thought crimes" that those bastards might record during your lifetime. If you
|
|
don't care that your privacy is totally destroyed under this potential
|
|
monitoring system (that could be in effect any time in the near future), just
|
|
keep in mind that in most countries, "thought crimes" are criminal offenses.
|
|
In many laws, the phrase "or conspiracy to..." is enough to put you in prison
|
|
for as much time as someone that actually committed the offense.
|
|
|
|
Also, when video conferencing is built into telephones it is an eventual fact
|
|
that Big Brother will take advantage of that as well. All Big Brother will need
|
|
is greater storage capacities (no problem since tax dollars feed Big Brother's
|
|
unquenchable need to invade our privacy) and video clips can accompany our
|
|
recorded voice conversations. Big Brother could then put a face to the voice
|
|
and identify the "thought criminal" extremely quickly. With a powerful system,
|
|
a Thought Policeman could access your electronic dossier as soon as your video
|
|
conference call begins. Is this technology truly beneficial to the average
|
|
person? Is it necessary to have in your home? I hope I have made the point
|
|
that technology can be used for good or evil purposes. Always be aware of
|
|
that and take it into consideration before buying into it.
|
|
|
|
This topic is definitely controversial, and a lot of facts don't exist for this
|
|
particular freedom crushing scheme. However, as time passes and computer and
|
|
telephone technology continues to advance, the power it can offer its user is
|
|
phenomenal. Big Brother has, is and will use technology to invade our privacy.
|
|
That's something that isn't going to change. Arm yourself with the skills
|
|
necessary to fight back and use technology against Big Brother. Various types
|
|
of ammunition are necessary. Some ammo to use in this war for free thoughts
|
|
are knowledge, practical experience and an open mind. Know your enemy and know
|
|
yourself. Arm yourself with the awareness of the technology that exists. Then
|
|
be willing to protect yourself against all of Big Brother's invasive methods and
|
|
weapons. That is, by any means necessary. Your own privacy and freedom relies
|
|
on it. In other words, don't just allow them use new technology to their own
|
|
advantage against you. Fight fire with fire. I believe that is the only way
|
|
that Big Brother can be exposed and defeated.
|
|
|
|
Written by THC Phreak ú Damage, INC. (C)opyright 1998.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BLACKENED'S TIP OF THE MONTH - {BLACKENED}
|
|
Hacking local systems:
|
|
|
|
These tips are an introduction to hacking local systems. They are by no
|
|
means complete. However, they are important and should be considered by
|
|
newbies that want to start hacking systems in their local area. I have read
|
|
a lot of messages posted in nets lately, regarding PBXs, VMBs, extenders and
|
|
local UNIX systems etc. Basically, the users that were posting didn't think
|
|
that this type of hacking 'still goes on'. Some users didn't think that
|
|
companies/businesses/large corporations use PBXs and VMBs anymore. Haha...
|
|
Many of them didn't know what the acronym PBX stands for etc. In other words,
|
|
they were misinformed or ignorant. The comment of "I didn't think anyone hacked
|
|
PBXs anymore or was into that." surprised me. A few wondered about ANI and how
|
|
it relates to PBXs. I remember one user in particular that was posting about
|
|
dialing out through PBXs and confused about ld charges etc. Someone else
|
|
assumed that they all have 16 digit passcodes to dial out. Some others thought
|
|
that hacking them was merely a fad in h/p. I can assure everyone that it isn't
|
|
a fad. Hacking PBXs is nothing new. Plus, many hackers/phreaks are still into
|
|
hacking local systems, including PBXs, VMBs etc. This short article is meant to
|
|
clear up some of the misinformation that's being spread out there. You should
|
|
read these tips, keep them in mind and continue to learn about hacking local
|
|
systems safely.
|
|
|
|
Since there have already been articles included about scanning, trashing and
|
|
social engineering... I'm not going to repeat that information and explain
|
|
what each one of them is about. However, I'll just say that you'll need to
|
|
know something about them in order to get involved in hacking local systems.
|
|
|
|
Step 1:
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
"Alright. I've scanned a few local exchanges/entire NPA... now what?" Well,
|
|
congratulations ace. You were able to setup ToneLoc properly and scan local
|
|
exchanges. ;) Seriously though, there's a lot more that has to be done besides
|
|
scanning and finding systems. That is, if you want to be able to do anything
|
|
with the new found numbers that you have. What you do next all depends upon
|
|
what you've managed to find while scanning. For example, you'll need to have
|
|
a diverter. Some NPAs might have a free diverter. Others have diverters with
|
|
passcodes. Of course, if the latter is the case, hack the passcode with
|
|
ToneLoc (or whatever scanner/code hacker you prefer). If you didn't find a
|
|
diverter, there are still many options available to you. For example, if
|
|
you found some local extenders, find out where they reach. Then check to see
|
|
if they divert by calling an ANI. There should be a local ANI in your NPA.
|
|
Scan for it, check lists of ANIs or ask a local phreak for one to use. Or,
|
|
you can use a 1-800 ANI if you have one instead. There are also usually some
|
|
local numbers of companies that report your ANI when called. Or, if you found
|
|
some local VMBs, hack a box and see if they support dialing out. If they do,
|
|
check to see if they divert. Obviously, PBXs can also be used to divert your
|
|
calls. Again, they can be local PBXs or 1-800s. Don't call ld h/p boards or
|
|
your ld friends with them yet though. ;) Don't call any carriers (local UNIX
|
|
systems etc.) and start trying to break into them yet either. You have to know
|
|
more about diverting and safe hacking before you can start exploring. If you've
|
|
tried all of the above, and can't figure out how to divert your calls... then
|
|
read Blackie Lawless' article on junction boxes again. You can setup diverter
|
|
boxes on lines in Bell cans, blue box, bounce your calls, etc. as a means of
|
|
diverting as well. Obviously, if you're going to use the junction box method
|
|
(or beige box) to call carriers, you'll need to have a laptop with a modem.
|
|
|
|
Step 2:
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
"I'm able to divert my calls now. Wow! This is cool. I've scanned and found
|
|
a few systems that I want to explore. What should I do now?"
|
|
|
|
Cool. You're a big hax0r now. We phear you. ;) Well, you still might
|
|
need to do a few things before proceeding with your hack. For example, if
|
|
you require further information on a company, you could CNA them and go
|
|
trashing to see if you can find some valid logins, manuals and company
|
|
documents to read. Or, you could get the name and address of the company
|
|
through a reverse database listing by entering in the phone number. Or, you
|
|
could scan around it and try to find another one of their company's lines. If
|
|
you find a voice line (someone answers and they identify themselves by the
|
|
company's name), you could attempt to social engineer them for whatever
|
|
information you require. Then again, if it's just a local UNIX system, you
|
|
could just try some default accounts and passwords to login etc. As you can
|
|
see, there are many options available to you. It all depends upon where you
|
|
live and which company's system you are trying to access. In some areas, the
|
|
security is very lax...since the h/p scene isn't active. Therefore, the Admins
|
|
themselves aren't very active (lazy, don't patch holes etc.) and don't take any
|
|
measures to improve security. Basically, if the system hasn't been hacked out
|
|
already, then it probably isn't as secure as it should be... and a lot of known
|
|
exploits will still work. Just don't get in the habit of relying on the Admins
|
|
to be lazy and stupid... because obviously not all of them are. ;)
|
|
|
|
It's also a good idea not to start giving out local codes (extenders, PBXs etc.)
|
|
to everyone you know... and don't know on boards or wherever. Plus, don't
|
|
start bragging about what you're doing/hacking. And don't do any intentional
|
|
damage to systems that you're able to get into. That is, except for altering
|
|
logs and covering your tracks so that you won't be traced. If you do fuck
|
|
around, it might come back to haunt you. Not only will they be on alert, but
|
|
the security will most likely be changed in order to prevent similar
|
|
occurrences. Not to mention, it's a good way to get yourself busted. ;) As
|
|
in, they'll be watching and trying to trace you for sure if you go out and do
|
|
that. So, just keep that in mind.
|
|
|
|
Step 3:
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
"Am I ready to start exploring now?" The short answer is, yes. You can start
|
|
exploring whatever you've found. That is, as long as you know what you're
|
|
doing at this point. Meaning, you are relatively intelligent and stealthful.
|
|
Just don't abuse things such as PBXs, VMBs, extenders, any outdials etc. by
|
|
calling ld excessively with them, until they're changed, go down (in the case
|
|
of some local codes like extenders) or you're busted. If you use a few PBXs
|
|
sparingly, then your few ld calls a month can go unnoticed for a *long* time.
|
|
;)
|
|
|
|
As for any carriers (UNIX systems, any dialup networks such as X.29 packet
|
|
switching and the like) that you find and want to explore, it's basically up to
|
|
you as to what you do. As long as you divert, don't do any damage once
|
|
logged in, are aware of what you're doing, don't keep trying to guess a login,
|
|
know about logs (their logging system, paths) etc. then you'll probably have an
|
|
enjoyable experience. Hopefully you aren't just out to grab passwd files to
|
|
decrypt, or get shell accounts on as many systems as you can. And you should
|
|
also know that not all systems store their logs in default paths. Some have
|
|
backups in hidden directories as well etc. So, that's just another thing to
|
|
be aware of while hacking carriers.
|
|
|
|
In conclusion, local hacking can still be interesting, beneficial to you and
|
|
a lot of fun. So, the next time someone talks about internet related hacking,
|
|
you don't have to be ashamed if you're into hacking local systems and networks.
|
|
What you get involved in is totally your choice. Even though I divided the
|
|
article into three steps, it isn't a complete guide or set of instructions.
|
|
Basically, I just thought I'd share a few tips on the subject of local hacking:
|
|
what is out there, how to get started and what it's all about since some people
|
|
assume that this aspect of hacking is dead. ;)
|
|
|
|
Written by BLACKENED ú Damage, INC. (C)opyright 1998.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BREAKER'S REVIEWS - {REVIEWS}
|
|
H/P and Security Web Site Reviews:
|
|
|
|
This is a list of quality H/P or security related web sites. I'll try to
|
|
check these and keep them updated and free of 404's. Since Breaker wasn't
|
|
able to do the reviews this month, the following reviews were compiled by
|
|
Damage, INC. However, I'm sure that Breaker will return to reviewing web
|
|
sites in the next issue. ;)
|
|
|
|
|
|
cDc
|
|
www.cultdeadcow.com
|
|
Cult of the Dead Cow's site has it all... cDc is one of the original ezines
|
|
and it's still going strong. If you visit, be sure to download Back Orifice.
|
|
BUTTSniffer (a BO add-on) was just released recently as well. Also, don't
|
|
forget to order your cDc t-shirts. ;)
|
|
|
|
DigiCrime, Inc.
|
|
www.digicrime.com
|
|
Join the digital underground... DigiCrime has comical products, services and
|
|
a mailing list that you can join. There's also a section for exploits,
|
|
news etc.
|
|
|
|
HDC
|
|
www.hackers.com
|
|
Hackers.com has general h/p information, projects, archives, text files on
|
|
security, exploits and links. There are also files and tips for h/p
|
|
neophytes. The site itself looks cool, and is fairly well layed out...but it's
|
|
very graphical with quite a bit of animation and effects.
|
|
|
|
Information Warfare
|
|
www.infowar.com
|
|
There's always new material being added to InfoWar's site. You can subscribe
|
|
for free to their mailing list and have info sent to you via Email. There's
|
|
security information, a search engine for documents on the site, and information
|
|
on InfoWarCon '98 in London.
|
|
|
|
Inside AOL
|
|
www.inside-aol.com
|
|
Do you hate AOL? This site is setup to expose the truth about America Online.
|
|
It's one of the better "anti-AOL sites" out there. Basically, it offers
|
|
some good information about AOL and their rules, censorship, privacy
|
|
infringement, etc. There are also some funny pranks, Email messages, threats
|
|
from AOL, etc. and links to other anti-AOL sites... which they have rated.
|
|
The site is also updated fairly regularly with articles and news.
|
|
|
|
L0pht Heavy Industries
|
|
www.l0pht.com
|
|
What is there to say about the L0pht? ;) The site is operated by a group of
|
|
Boston based hackers... that are well known (not only in the underground,
|
|
but in the media as well). L0phtCrack is available to download. There's
|
|
also BUTTSniffer, other tools and products. They have extensive archives,
|
|
recent articles from various sources, L0pht Advisories, the L0pht BBS, a
|
|
nice search engine, information on the major h/p Cons, etc. You can also
|
|
go through the Black Crawling Systems archives which includes a wide variety
|
|
of files. It's a very large site and there's always updated info/news/articles
|
|
online to read. Overall, it's an excellent site and a good source of h/p
|
|
information. So, if you haven't already visited it, then I suggest that you
|
|
check it out sometime.
|
|
|
|
LOD Communications Inc.
|
|
www.lod.com
|
|
LOD offers internet services, UNIX support and services, archives (common
|
|
h/p utils), Bell Shock Force! Hall of Shame volumes and links to other
|
|
sites. However, it's not updated often... and there have only been three
|
|
volumes of BSF released.
|
|
|
|
Phone Losers of America
|
|
www.phonelosers.org
|
|
PLA has been around for quite a few years and have released many issues.
|
|
RedBoxChiliPepper, Colleen Card, etc. are still around. It's a cool, must
|
|
visit site for anyone that's into phreaking. Also, check their site for the
|
|
PLA site nearest you. ;)
|
|
|
|
Digital Information Society
|
|
www.phreak.org
|
|
Digital Information Society's site (DIS) offers phreaking related information,
|
|
security and the underground. Also, check out their ftp.phreak.org site for
|
|
their archive collection. I didn't go through every area of their site, but
|
|
they have information on their users, their group, some links etc.
|
|
|
|
Secure Networks, Inc.
|
|
www.secnet.com
|
|
This site has Security auditing software, vulnerability research and various
|
|
security related services. You can download an evaluation version of
|
|
Ballista(TM), which is one of their commercial security programs. There
|
|
are also some free security tools available to download as well. They also
|
|
release technical reports and security advisories etc. From what I read,
|
|
they have information on securing proxy servers, firewalls, etc. Overall,
|
|
it looks like a fairly decent security site.
|
|
|
|
System Failure
|
|
www.sysfail.org
|
|
If you haven't read SysFail, then visit their site and download all of the
|
|
issues. They put together a very cool h/p related zine that offers a lot
|
|
information. However, Sysfail issue #14 was mainly filled with DefCon reviews
|
|
by several members though. So, make sure you leech all of the back issues.
|
|
Or, you can just download the articles that interest you. Overall, their
|
|
site is excellent and has a lot of resources. ;)
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's all of the reviews for this issue. You may have noticed that many of
|
|
the sites reviewed this month are very well known and popular etc. Well, that
|
|
was by design. It was done as a tribute to some of the groups that've been
|
|
around in the scene for a long time. I thought that it would be appropriate
|
|
for us to do that in issue #12 since it marks the end of a year... and is
|
|
just something different. Also, we're going to start adding links on the
|
|
Damage, INC. web site (http://members.tripod.com/~damage_inc) to every site
|
|
that has been reviewed so that people won't forget to check them out. ;)
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSPIRACIES AND COVERUPS - {COVERUPS}
|
|
NWO Part 3: U.S. Concentration Camps.
|
|
|
|
Just to be perfectly clear, this article is *not* about the camps that were
|
|
established during World War II to detain Americans and Canadians of Japanese
|
|
and German heritage. Although the abuse of their rights was corrupt and
|
|
abdominal, it is not as bad as what faces us right now. This article will
|
|
reveal the preparations of globalists within the United States Government to
|
|
send American citizens to concentration camps after their totalitarian regime
|
|
takes over.
|
|
|
|
U.S. National Emergency
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
The first most likely step in the globalist take-over of the United States
|
|
starts with their lackey, the President. You may or may not know that the
|
|
President has the power to issue Executive Orders. Executive Orders can be put
|
|
into effect at any time a national state of emergency is declared by the
|
|
President. During a National Emergency, the President essentially becomes the
|
|
dictator of the United States. Below I have a list of Executive Orders that can
|
|
be called upon by the President during a "national emergency":
|
|
|
|
Exec.
|
|
Order # Civil Rights, Liberties, and Powers taken from the American people
|
|
------- ------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
10995 All communications media seized by the Federal Government.
|
|
10997 Seizure of all electrical power, fuels, including gasoline and
|
|
minerals.
|
|
10998 Seizure of all food resources, farms and farm equipment.
|
|
10999 Seizure of all kinds of transportation, including your
|
|
personal car, and control of all highways and seaports.
|
|
11000 Seizure of all civilians for work under Federal supervision.
|
|
11001 Federal takeover of all health, education and welfare.
|
|
11002 Postmaster General empowered to register every man, woman and child
|
|
in the U.S.A.
|
|
11003 Seizure of all aircraft and airports by the Federal Government.
|
|
11004 Housing and Finance authority may shift population from one locality
|
|
to another. Complete integration.
|
|
11005 Seizure of railroads, inland waterways, and storage facilities.
|
|
11051 The Director of the Office of Emergency Planning authorized to put
|
|
Executive Orders into effect in "times of increased international
|
|
tension or financial crisis". He is also to perform such additional
|
|
functions as the President may direct.
|
|
|
|
All of the Executive Orders above, plus others I was unable to list can be put
|
|
into motion if the President activates Executive Order 11490. Richard Nixon
|
|
created 11490 on October 28, 1969. Executive Order 11490 represents the death
|
|
of freedom and liberty in the United States. It is also the easiest way to
|
|
mobilize the carefully laid plans of the globalists that are the enemies of the
|
|
U.S. Constitution. These plans include the distribution of American citizens
|
|
into concentration camps, so they must work as slaves for the Federal
|
|
Government.
|
|
|
|
Rounding up the zombies
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
Before I get into the actual concentration camps, I must explain what powers
|
|
and responsibilities the various U.S. bureaucracies will have. During a
|
|
state of national emergency, the Post Office department would be responsible
|
|
for the implementation of a mandatory national registry. That will make it
|
|
easy for them to identify a particular slave, check their dossiers compiled
|
|
by Big Brother, etc. Then the prospective slave can be sent to a concentration
|
|
camp that matches his or her particular skills.
|
|
|
|
The Justice Department would have joint and equal responsibility with the Dept.
|
|
of State for prevention of escape from the U.S.; for replenishing the stockpile
|
|
of narcotics; control of the national police force; for prisons, concentration
|
|
camps, slave labour camps and mental institutions; for mass feeding and housing
|
|
of prisoners and to use said "prisoners" for slave labour.
|
|
|
|
The State Department would be responsible for the safety of the United Nations
|
|
(NWO) personnel and/or property, and to prevent American citizens from escaping
|
|
from the United States. The Department of Defense would be responsible for
|
|
seizing independent American industries; direction of service and national
|
|
production system, control of censorship; and communication expropriation of
|
|
non-industrial facilities. The Commerce Department would be responsible for the
|
|
looting of American homes, and the redistribution of all commodities stolen.
|
|
They are also responsible for census information and human resources. The
|
|
Treasury Department would be responsible for collection of cash and non-cash
|
|
items and the recreation of evidence of assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
|
As you should be able to clearly see, the Executive Orders listed above supply
|
|
the President (and his puppet masters) with the excuses necessary to enslave
|
|
America without the zombies reacting to the takeover until it is too late. When
|
|
the special urban units I described in my previous NWO article are busting down
|
|
the doors of American citizens "seizing" every human being and material object
|
|
in the United States it definitely is too late. During a declared state of
|
|
emergency, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are suspended. After that
|
|
happens, all of the stunned zombies will rounded up so that they can be assigned
|
|
to their slave labour camps at their local post offices. Then the zombies will
|
|
be sent off, one by one, to various concentration camps throughout the United
|
|
States. There they will be slaves of the New World Order. The army will then
|
|
assist the Commerce department to loot the vacated homes. At this time, all
|
|
firearms in the United States can be captured if the majority of Americans
|
|
allow it.
|
|
|
|
Below is a list of military bases that are prepared to become civilian
|
|
concentration camps during a "state of emergency." This is by no means a
|
|
complete list of concentration camps. If I was to somehow compile such a list,
|
|
I'd also have to include all American prisons that have incarcerated naive drug
|
|
users, etc.
|
|
|
|
List of U.S. Military Bases that can become U.S. Concentration Camps
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Ft. Chaffee, Arkansas Ft. Drum, New York
|
|
Ft. Indian Gap, Pennsylvania Camp A. P. Hill, Virginia
|
|
Oakdale, California Eglin Air Force Base, Florida
|
|
Vendenberg AFB, California Ft. Mc Coy, Wisconsin
|
|
Ft. Benning, Georgia Ft. Huachuca, Arizona
|
|
Camp Krome, Florida
|
|
|
|
Also keep in mind that any prison can be easily packed to capacity and become
|
|
a concentration camp. Do you remember that I wrote an article on prison
|
|
industries in Issue #9 of the Damage, INC. Newsletter? In my opinion, it isn't
|
|
a coincidence that virtually all prisons in the United States have been
|
|
converted into factories that exploit slave labour. When the globalists attempt
|
|
to take over, they only have to increase the scale of the corruption that
|
|
already exists.
|
|
|
|
A life of slavery is the fate of the average person that chooses to live under
|
|
the control of the New World Order. However, the short sequence of events I've
|
|
described above has been simplified due to space considerations. I believe I've
|
|
given you a lot of information to think about. It is a fact that there are
|
|
complex plans for the seizure of civilians, and all their property by the
|
|
globalist controlled U.S. Government. The plans combined are called Operation
|
|
Garden Plot. In the next issue of the Damage, INC. Newsletter I will discuss
|
|
Operation Garden Plot, as well as more intricate details into their bold
|
|
conspiracy to become the totalitarian masters of the United States.
|
|
|
|
The goals of the globalist conspirators are clear. In their New World Order,
|
|
the masses are nothing more than nameless, faceless zombies to be used as slave
|
|
labour. What I have shared with you in this article isn't fiction created by me
|
|
to fool you. The concentration camps are all ready for zombies that are
|
|
ill-prepared and unwilling to fight for their freedom. The Executive Orders
|
|
exist and could easily be put into affect. That is a sad but true fact. I also
|
|
believe that readers around the world can benefit from this article. Afterall,
|
|
if freedom is eliminated in the United States, rights and freedom in weak
|
|
countries like Canada will crumble extremely quickly. Basically, they'd just
|
|
instantly follow suit. Now that you have been introduced to this great
|
|
conspiracy, it is up to all Americans to decide if you are willing to line up
|
|
to be registered as a slave of the NWO or not when Executive Order 11490 takes
|
|
away your rights that *were* protected under the Constitution and the Bill of
|
|
Rights. Now that you're aware of it and informed, make sure you're prepared.
|
|
|
|
Written by Shatazar ú Damage, INC. (C)opyright 1998.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CORRUPTION AND GREED - {GREED}
|
|
Bill C-68; Corrupt and Oppressive Gun Control:
|
|
|
|
What is C-68 and its purpose? What is the agenda of the Canadian Government
|
|
in relation to this bill? Does it affect everyone? I don't own a firearm,
|
|
so why should I care about it? I'm not a Canadian, so how does C-68 apply
|
|
to me? Why is it important that I know about it?
|
|
|
|
First, I've watched coverage of protests, read articles, reports and countless
|
|
text files on C-68 (from the National Firearm Association (NFA), people's
|
|
opinions and the actual bill itself)... therefore, I feel that I'm adequately
|
|
informed and qualified to write an article on this topic. An article on
|
|
Bill C-68 (written by David A. Tomlinson) was included in the Reports from
|
|
the Front section. In comparison to other articles that I've read on the
|
|
subject, it's short but it contains some very good points. If you would like
|
|
a copy of Bill C-68 "An act respecting firearms and other weapons." and other
|
|
text files relating to it, then leave me Email.
|
|
|
|
Bill C-68 is a poorly written, intentionally ambiguous document. The purpose
|
|
is to restrict and control firearms. In my opinion, the goal of the Canadian
|
|
government is to eliminate them altogether... and disarm all Canadians. Right
|
|
in C-68, "Gun Free Zones" are discussed and provisions are made for their
|
|
creation. It is *not* just about licensing weapons and paying fees. It is
|
|
about taking away the rights of citizens. As in, we should have the right
|
|
to defend ourselves and protect our property. We should be allowed to have
|
|
firearms for hunting, collecting and target shooting etc. It isn't about
|
|
stopping criminals, reducing crime or "protecting" us from dangerous weapons.
|
|
Haha. Whether or not guns have to be registered and licensed makes absolutely
|
|
no difference to criminals. Obviously, they will never turn in their weapons.
|
|
Nor will they follow the laws so that their weapons can be traced back to them.
|
|
And, they don't need to buy firearms legally at gun shops with an FAC in hand.
|
|
They can steal them or smuggle them across the border into Canada if needed.
|
|
In other words, it won't affect them at all. Therefore, that proves that
|
|
C-68 isn't aimed at criminals. That is something that the National Firearm
|
|
Association (NFA), myself and many gun owners agree on. It's just a logical
|
|
fact, that the government can't seem to successfully dispute... no matter
|
|
how much political rhetoric they spew out of their mouths. Every Canadian
|
|
is affected by C-68, regardless of whether or not you currently possess any
|
|
firearms. Especially since, they can break into your home and search for
|
|
weapons to confiscate. That doesn't require you to do anything wrong at all.
|
|
All it takes is for a suspicious neighbour or vengeful enemy to make an
|
|
anonymous phone call stating that you have an unregistered .22 calibre firearm
|
|
hidden in your house. Basically, that is enough to give them the power to
|
|
take actions against you... regardless of your own naiveness or innocence.
|
|
|
|
Also, Bill C-68 wasn't even available to read or download from government
|
|
web sites. They've made a conscious effort to hide it from Canadian citizens
|
|
and make sure it's as inaccessible as possible in my opinion. That just
|
|
proves how this country is following in the footsteps of other nations, such
|
|
as China and Cuba. Those two communist countries aren't only trading partners
|
|
with Canada, they are role models which Cretien and the rest of the federal
|
|
Liberal Government want to follow... and aspire to become. In fact, you
|
|
might even say that Cretien (the current Canadian Prime Minister) considers
|
|
Cuba (lead by his friend, Castro) to be one of his allies. But that's another
|
|
topic. ;)
|
|
|
|
One of the fundamental things that is wrong with C-68 is the overwhelming
|
|
control that it gives to a corrupt government. Since it's so poorly written,
|
|
they can interpret sections any way that they want... and thus the Canadian
|
|
citizens with firearms can't really protect themselves against prosecution
|
|
and fines. I've read it all, and even I can't understand how to avoid getting
|
|
busted for transporting firearms in a safe and "legal" manner. In other words,
|
|
they can make it impossible for you to do so, since they've left so many
|
|
loop holes in the document. Therefore, they have made sure there are provisions
|
|
for them to do whatever they want. They can increase the fees for registering
|
|
firearms, take away the right to transport a weapon in your car, and make
|
|
zones (which could be entire cities) in which guns are totally illegal to
|
|
possess. At least, that's how I interpret what C-68 reads... But as I stated
|
|
before, it's very difficult to be certain due to the language that they chose
|
|
to use and the way that it's written. It is Govspeak at its finest.
|
|
|
|
I decided to include the following article by Dave Tomlinson of the NFA in
|
|
order to explain the complicated registration fees in C-68... since he
|
|
did an excellent job of showing how it works and saying it like it is. Even
|
|
though it was written towards the end of 1996, the information that it contains
|
|
is still relevant (except for the voting/election portion at the bottom).
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
C-68 Firearms Fees
|
|
|
|
From: "David A. Tomlinson"
|
|
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 1996 18:41:46 -0600 (CST)
|
|
Subject: C-68 Firearms Fees
|
|
|
|
06 Nov 96: The Canadian Firearms Centre [CFC] branch of the Department
|
|
of Justice [DoJ] has finally issued the schedule of fees for various
|
|
firearms permits, licenses, etc. It is quite remarkable, and will
|
|
destroy the Canadian firearms community as we know it. Some crippled
|
|
"thing" may survive, but the fee schedule is proof positive that the
|
|
Liberals are out to "get" us.
|
|
|
|
Table A says that a License to possess and to acquire non-restricted
|
|
firearms will cost you $60. If you want to have handguns on it, it
|
|
will jump to $80. It will also cost you $60 for a license to possess
|
|
and acquire _crossbows_. That last license fee gets to me. How nutty
|
|
_are_ these serfs of the Liberal Party?
|
|
|
|
The fee to register one or more currently-owned non-restricted firearms
|
|
is $10 in the first year, rising to $18. The fee for registering a
|
|
newly-acquired one jumps your cost to $15 _per_gun_. The fee to
|
|
register a newly-acquired restricted weapon or "prohibited firearm"
|
|
jumps again, to $30_per_gun_. That is Liberal "social engineering."
|
|
They are making it more expensive to acquire the new firearm (behavior
|
|
that the Liberals classify as "politically incorrect") and even more
|
|
expensive to acquire any _firearm_ that the Liberals classify as
|
|
"politically incorrect."
|
|
|
|
Lose a license or a registration certificate? Its replacement will cost
|
|
you $25.
|
|
|
|
REMEMBER: YOU MUST HAVE A LICENSE PLUS ONE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE FOR
|
|
EVERY FIREARM YOU OWN WHEN C-68 COMES INTO FULL FORCE.
|
|
|
|
Table D says that the cost of importing any firearm will be boosted by
|
|
requiring the dealer to pay for a $20 Import Permit, plus $4 per
|
|
firearm imported, plus $4 per firearm for a "Confirmation of
|
|
Authorization to Import."
|
|
|
|
More "social engineering." That adds $8 per firearm plus the
|
|
additional administrative costs to the dealer plus a share of the $20
|
|
Import Permit to the price of every imported firearm, because the
|
|
Liberals regard importing firearms and buying imported firearms as
|
|
"politically incorrect."
|
|
|
|
The same fees apply to the _exporting_ of firearms. Canadian firearms
|
|
manufacturers are going to disappear; they cannot afford that sort of
|
|
taxation on _exports_. Apparently the Liberals regard our few firearms
|
|
manufacturers -- who have been bringing new money into Canada by their
|
|
exports -- as "politically incorrect" businesses that their "social
|
|
engineering" will hound out of existence.
|
|
|
|
Bulk imports or exports are even worse. The first shipment of 300 guns
|
|
- -- in or out of Canada -- costs $5000. The next 2 shipments of 200
|
|
each cost $2000 per shipment. That is a tax of nearly $17 per gun on
|
|
the first 300, and $10 per gun on each of the next 400. They are
|
|
ruining Canadian competitiveness in the world market -- and for what?
|
|
"Political correctness."
|
|
|
|
It seems unlikely that any firearms business can survive this Liberal
|
|
"social engineering." If the Liberals are re-elected, this will come
|
|
into force and all those jobs and all those foreign earnings will
|
|
disappear --along with the jobs of every Canadian in the firearms
|
|
industry.
|
|
|
|
There is one consolation for all the Canadians who will be thrown out
|
|
of work. They will no longer be classified by the Liberal Party as
|
|
"politically incorrect" on the basis of where they work.
|
|
|
|
An Authorization to Transport a restricted firearm (replaces a Permit
|
|
to Carry) for target shooting costs $40 per year. If you are carrying
|
|
it "To protect life," the fee goes up to $100 per year. Apparently
|
|
the life of a citizen is not worth protecting, so they penalize anyone
|
|
who wants to do that.
|
|
|
|
The Table says nothing about fees for Authorization to Transport rifles
|
|
and shotguns for hunting and target practice, but that will probably
|
|
come in soon after the Liberals get re-elected -- if they do.
|
|
|
|
If you are carrying because your "Employment" requires it, the fee is
|
|
$40 per year. We have two major armored car companies in Canada, each
|
|
with about 2500 employees who carry guns. Their overhead just went up
|
|
by 40 X 2500 = $100,000.
|
|
|
|
Add to that the information dropped -- casually -- in the course of the
|
|
conference call as Carolyn St-Denis (CFC Senior Policy Analyst) briefed
|
|
the major dealers, armored car firms, and manufacturers that another
|
|
Liberal government department is going to require $400 armored vests
|
|
for every armed employee, and that increased overhead goes to
|
|
$1,100,000 in the first year of Rock's Folly.
|
|
|
|
If you use the armored car service, expect your fees to jump sharply.
|
|
|
|
A final word: Because _you_ have now become part of the huge voting
|
|
bloc that is the Canadian firearms community -- because _you_ are now
|
|
being courted by the Reform Party and the Conservative Party -- both of
|
|
which are promising _you_ that they will repeal Bill C-68 if you will
|
|
only vote them into office --
|
|
|
|
The Liberals are strongly considering putting Rock's Folly back on the
|
|
shelf until _after_ the election. They still think that you are too
|
|
stupid to work or vote against them unless they are actively attacking
|
|
you on voting day.
|
|
|
|
Boy, are they stupid. Do you think that accounts for the fact that
|
|
they ran Canada $600 billion in debt -- to buy soup?
|
|
|
|
Stay tuned for the latest news...
|
|
|
|
Dave Tomlinson, NFA
|
|
|
|
"Everyone told me that it was impossible to weld the Canadian firearms
|
|
community into a voting bloc. Then they told me why it was
|
|
impossible. Then I -- and a few good people who shared the vision --
|
|
went out and did it."
|
|
|
|
Early NFA Member
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
In summary, Bill C-68 is a corrupt and greedy act. The Canadian government
|
|
is seeking control over the citizens of Canada (or rather, Communista) through
|
|
this bill. The fees that they seek (as described in the above C-68 Firearms
|
|
Fees article by Dave Tomlinson) for gun registration aren't just driven by
|
|
their need for greed. It's much more sinister a plot than that. Plus, the
|
|
Liberals "ain't done yet" in my opinion. Amongst citizens that are gun owners,
|
|
there's great opposition to C-68, and with just cause. The cost alone to
|
|
average hunters, gun collectors, etc. is potentially overwhelming. Not to
|
|
mention the fact that they don't want Big Brother on their backs... and invading
|
|
their homes "in search of weapons". I am completely against C-68, including
|
|
what it represents and foreshadows. Hopefully this article (and the ones that
|
|
I've included in the Reports from the Front section) have given you some needed
|
|
information and insight into this corrupt government act. I also hope that
|
|
strong actions are taken to prevent governments (not only in Canada) from
|
|
being able to restrict rights such as these. Voting in elections for
|
|
politicians that "claim" to oppose C-68 or like acts isn't enough. In fact,
|
|
it may lead you into a sense of false security. I believe that a message must
|
|
be sent to show them that we aren't just going to sit on our hands and take it.
|
|
Indifference, silence and pacifism don't work. Protect yourself by making sure
|
|
that you're informed. I suggest that every Canadian citizen read C-68 very
|
|
thoroughly, try to discern the meaning and form your own opinions. Most
|
|
importantly, don't let them disarm you without a fight. Afterall, that is
|
|
what they want. Their highest goal is a police state.
|
|
|
|
Written by BLACKENED ú Damage, INC. (C)opyright 1998.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CROSSED WIRES - {WIRES}
|
|
|
|
If you'd like to advertise your h/p board or net here, contact us at
|
|
damage_inc@mailcity.com and attach an ascii advertisement to the message.
|
|
|
|
______
|
|
________________________________________________| |_________
|
|
|_______ ____________ _ /________ ___ |
|
|
_______| |____________| |/ /_______|_ | / |_
|
|
| __ | / |/___| |
|
|
|__ |__| __ | _ __ |_
|
|
___| |____ ___ |/ _ / ___ |_| ____|__| ____|__
|
|
| ___ \ | | / |/ / | / | |_______ |_______ |
|
|
| \ | \| |/ | / |/___| |_| |_| |
|
|
| \|______________|\_______| ____|___________________________________|
|
|
|___\ __ ___________ |____|ohseven _____________ _______ _
|
|
///_..-" //_________________\\ "-.._\\\ |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
t h i s i s t h e l a n d o f i n f i n i t e d a r k n e s s :
|
|
|
|
crystalnet.cybercrime.dark rhythms int'l.dorenet.feistnet.fidonet
|
|
infinet.insanity net.kitsch net.la naranja.landnet.pagan/occult net
|
|
paranor.psycho2net.redneck net.rgsnet.sinnet.sysop's tech net
|
|
saturnnet.usenet.usernet.vibez net.wandernet.xpresitnet
|
|
|
|
+1-954-797-0666 - online since 1989 - +1-305-621-3099
|
|
|
|
thirty gigabytes - twenty four message networks
|
|
forty four doorgames - all free, all the time
|
|
four dialin lines - teleconference - 24/7
|
|
full system access on your first call
|
|
|
|
screw the internet. support your local bbs scene.
|
|
|
|
bbses are dead. yeah, that's the ticket.
|
|
|
|
- midsorrow@ice.org http://www.shadow.net/~mwaas
|
|
- join cybercrime at http://www.ice.org/~midsorrow
|
|
|
|
|
|
DRUGS DISCUSSION - {DRUGS}
|
|
THC content and meaning:
|
|
|
|
Chant this out loud and repeat until sufficiently brainwashed:
|
|
|
|
"Another missed opportunity to smoke crack in front of your child."
|
|
and
|
|
"Another missed opportunity to shoot up in front of your child."
|
|
and
|
|
"Another missed opportunity to discuss THC with your child."
|
|
|
|
Yes kids, it's time for another talk about drugs. This month, I'm going
|
|
to explain why marijuana is such a dangerous and evil plant. You see, it's
|
|
illegal and wrong to smoke it. Plus, the THC that it contains will make
|
|
you stupid and lazy. Smoking pot will turn you into a social outcast. It
|
|
isn't cool. So, don't give in to peer pressure... Blah.. Blah.. Blah. :)
|
|
|
|
{Government propaganda ends}
|
|
|
|
Alright, now that I've mocked the Government for misinforming and trying
|
|
to influence everyone... I'll explain what the intention of this article is.
|
|
Since there are still some misconceptions out there about marijuana, THC,
|
|
what it is and what it does... I decided to write a short article to clarify
|
|
it. In this article, I will provide facts and reliable information pertaining
|
|
to THC (TetraHydraCannabinol) in order to inform readers that may lack knowledge
|
|
and an understanding of it. I'll try not to make it too boring. :)
|
|
|
|
The chemical THC has not been proven to be addictive. It's not lethal. The
|
|
effects of it are temporary, not permanent. Without getting too technical,
|
|
it basically alters receptors in your brain, temporarily. That is what
|
|
gives you the feeling of being high. Don't worry though, it won't bake your
|
|
brain. :) That's because THC isn't toxic and is not a narcotic. There
|
|
hasn't been a single proven case of death that's directly caused by marijuana.
|
|
So, it's perfectly safe to smoke or ingest, and you won't die from it... or
|
|
"overdose" like you can with many other things. In fact, the more potent it
|
|
is (the higher the content of THC), the better... since you won't have to
|
|
smoke as much of it to get high. And the less you smoke, the better it is
|
|
for your health. An even healthier alternative is to eat it. If you do that
|
|
instead of smoking it, (or smoking it with tobacco), then all of the harmful
|
|
smoke that your lungs would've absorbed is avoided. If you don't want to eat
|
|
it then basically, the key is to buy very potent pot so that you only have
|
|
to smoke small quantities. Also, resin isn't a good indicator of potency.
|
|
Some varieties of marijuana may have a high amount of resin and not be very
|
|
potent at all, since a lot of the resin is made up of inactive ingredients
|
|
instead of active cannaboids (like THC). There have been some scientific
|
|
studies done on resin content that found it's not correlated with the potency.
|
|
So, it doesn't matter if a variety of marijuana has a lot of resin glands or
|
|
is resinous by nature. In fact, the better varieties are non-resinous and
|
|
are extremely potent... as resin can induce coughing and doesn't add to the
|
|
effects. In other words, it won't get you high so it's not something that you
|
|
want to exist in high amounts in marijuana.
|
|
|
|
I found this Family Council on Drug Awareness pamphlet while doing some drug
|
|
research. Since it's informative and interesting, I decided to include it
|
|
in my article for chronics and newbies to read. :)
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
10 Things Every Parent, Teenager & Teacher Should Know
|
|
|
|
About
|
|
|
|
Marijuana
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Prohibition...goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to
|
|
control a man's appetite by legislation and makes a crime out of things
|
|
that are not crimes. A prohibition law strikes a blow at the very
|
|
principles upon which our government was founded."
|
|
|
|
-- Abraham Lincoln
|
|
December, 1840
|
|
|
|
|
|
This pamphlet was researched and produced as a public service
|
|
by the Family Council on Drug Awareness P.O. Box 71093, LA CA
|
|
90071-0093
|
|
|
|
Additional copies available from:
|
|
|
|
BACH, PO Box 71093, L.A., CA 90071-0093
|
|
35 cents apiece, Ten for $2.00, 100 for $10
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Q. What is Marijuana?
|
|
|
|
A. "Marijuana" refers to the dried leaves and flowers of the cannabis
|
|
plant [1], which contain the non-narcotic chemical THC at various
|
|
potencies. It is smoked or eaten to produce the feeling of being
|
|
"high." The different strains of this herb produce different sensual
|
|
effects, ranging from sedative to stimulant.
|
|
|
|
2 Q. Who Uses Marijuana?
|
|
|
|
A. There is no simple profile of a typical marijuana user. It has been
|
|
used for 1000s of years for medical, social, and religious reasons
|
|
and for relaxation [2]. Several of our Presidents [3] are believed
|
|
to have smoked it. One out of every five Americans say they have
|
|
tried it. And it is still popular among artists, writers, musicians,
|
|
activists, lawyers, inventors, working people, etc.
|
|
|
|
3 Q. How Long Have People Been Using Marijuana?
|
|
|
|
A. Marijuana has been used since ancient times [4]. While field hands
|
|
and working people have often smoked the raw plant, aristocrats
|
|
historically prefer hashish [5] made from the cured flowers of the
|
|
plant. It was not seen as a problem until a calculated disinformation
|
|
[sic] campaign was launched in the 1930s [6], and the first American
|
|
laws against using it were passed [7].
|
|
|
|
4 Q. Is Marijuana Addictive?
|
|
|
|
A. No, it is not [8]. Most users are moderate consumers who smoke it
|
|
socially to relax. We now know that 10% of our population have
|
|
"addictive personalities" and they are neither more nor less
|
|
likely to overindulge in cannabis than in anything else. On a
|
|
relative scale, marijuana is less habit forming than either sugar
|
|
or chocolate but more so than anchovies. Sociologists report a general
|
|
pattern of marijuana use that peaks in the early adult years, followed
|
|
by a period of levelling off and then a gradual reduction in use [9].
|
|
|
|
5 Q. Has Anyone Ever Died From Smoking Marijuana?
|
|
|
|
A. No; not one single case, not ever. THC is one of the few chemicals for
|
|
which there is no known toxic amount [10]. The federal agency NIDA says
|
|
that autopsies reveal that 75 people per year are high on marijuana
|
|
when they die: this does not mean that marijuana caused or was even a
|
|
factor in their deaths. The chart below compares the number of deaths
|
|
attributable to selected substances in a typical year:
|
|
|
|
Tobacco...............................340,000 - 395,000
|
|
Alcohol (excluding crime/accidents).............125,000+
|
|
Drug Overdose (prescription)............24,000 - 27,000
|
|
Drug Overdose (illegal)...................3,800 - 5,200
|
|
Marijuana.............................................0
|
|
|
|
*Source: U.S. Government Bureau of Mortality Statistics, 1987
|
|
|
|
6 Q. Does Marijuana Lead to Crime and/or Hard Drugs?
|
|
|
|
A. No [11]. The only crime most marijuana users commit is that they use
|
|
marijuana. And, while many people who abuse dangerous drugs also smoke
|
|
marijuana, the old "stepping stone" theory is now discredited, since
|
|
virtually all of them started out "using" legal drugs like sugar,
|
|
coffee, cigarettes, alcohol, etc.
|
|
|
|
7 Q. Does Marijuana Make People Violent?
|
|
|
|
A. No. In fact, Federal Bureau of Narcotics director Harry Anslinger once
|
|
told Congress just the opposite - that it leads to non-violence and
|
|
pacifism [12]. If he was telling the truth (which he and key federal
|
|
agencies have not often done regarding marijuana), then re-legalizing
|
|
marijuana should be considered as one way to curb violence in our
|
|
cities. The simple fact is that marijuana does not change your basic
|
|
personality. The government says that over 20 million Americans still
|
|
smoke it, probably including some of the nicest people you know.
|
|
|
|
8 Q. How Does Marijuana Affect Your Health?
|
|
|
|
A. Smoking anything is not healthy, but marijuana is less dangerous than
|
|
tobacco and people smoke less of it at a time. This health risk can
|
|
be avoided by eating the plant instead of smoking it [13], or can be
|
|
reduced by smoking smaller amounts of stronger marijuana. There is
|
|
no proof that marijuana causes serious health or sexual problems [14]
|
|
but, like alcohol, its use by children or adolescents is discouraged.
|
|
Cannabis is a medicinal herb that has hundreds of proven, valuable
|
|
theraputic uses - from stress reduction to glaucoma to asthma to
|
|
cancer therapy, etc. [15].
|
|
|
|
9 Q. What About All Those Scary Statistics and Studies?
|
|
|
|
A. Most were prepared as scare tactics for the government by Dr. Gabriel
|
|
Nahas, and were so biased and unscientific that Nahas was fired by
|
|
the National Institute of Health [16] and finally renounced his own
|
|
studies as meaningless [17]. For one experiment, he suffocated monkeys
|
|
for five minutes at a time, using proportionately more smoke than the
|
|
average user inhales in an entire lifetime [18]. The other studies
|
|
that claim sensational health risks are also suspect, since they lack
|
|
controls and produce results which cannot be replicated or
|
|
independently verified [19].
|
|
|
|
10 Q. What Can I Do About Marijuana?
|
|
|
|
A. No independent government panel that has studied marijuana has ever
|
|
recommended jail for users [20]. Concerned persons should therefore
|
|
ask their legislators to re-legalize and tax this plant, subject to
|
|
age limits and regulations similar to those on alcohol and tobacco.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For More Information, Write:
|
|
Family Coucil on Drug Awareness
|
|
P.O. Box 71093, LA CA 90071-0093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOOTNOTES TO THE TEXT:
|
|
|
|
1. The same plant, known as hemp, has an estimated 50,000 non-drug
|
|
commercial uses including paper, textiles, fuels, food and sealants,
|
|
but these uses are also banned by existing laws. Sources: Encyclopedia
|
|
Britannica, federal documents and historical records.
|
|
|
|
2. Coptic Christians, Rhastafarnians [sic], Shintos, Hinus, Buddhists,
|
|
Sufis, Essenes, Zoroastrians, Bantus, and many other sects have
|
|
traditions that consider the plant to have religious value.
|
|
|
|
3. Their personal correspondence and records reveal that U.S. Presidents
|
|
Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, and others smoked hashish, as did Benjamin
|
|
Franklin and Mary Todd Lincoln. President John F. Kennedy is also
|
|
reported to have smoked marijuana to relieve his back pain. Many of
|
|
America's greatest leaders and Founding Fathers (including George
|
|
Washington) were hemp farmers. Sources: National Archives, published
|
|
reports.
|
|
|
|
4. Archeologists report that cannabis was possibly the first plant
|
|
cultivated by humans - about 8000 B.C. - and was used for linen,
|
|
paper, and garments. Source: Columbia University, _History of the
|
|
World_. It was being smoked in China and India as early as 2700 B.C.
|
|
|
|
5. Turkish smoking parlors were popular in both Europe and America. as
|
|
well as the Middle and Far East, as recently as the turn of the
|
|
Century.
|
|
|
|
6. The exhaustive Indian Hemp "Raj" Commission report (1986) by British
|
|
authorities found no reason to restrict its use. But the notorious
|
|
yellow journalist William Randolph Hearst fabricated and published
|
|
horror stories about marijuana that were eventually investigated and
|
|
shown to be lies, but not until long after the marijuana prohibition
|
|
was enacted in 1938. Source: Larry Sloman, _Reefer Madness_.
|
|
|
|
7. Laws against marijuana were passed a year after the invention of a
|
|
machine to harvest and process hemp so it could compete commercially
|
|
against businesses owned by Hearst, the DuPonts and other powerful
|
|
families. Source: Jack Herer, _The Emporor Wears No Clothes_.
|
|
|
|
8. Marijuana does not lead to physical dependency. Costa Rican Study,
|
|
1980; Jamaican Study, 1975; Nixon Blue Ribbon Report, 1972, et. al.
|
|
|
|
9. Source: Psychology Today, Newsweek, et.al.
|
|
|
|
10. Source: All univerity medical studies: UCLA, Harvard, Temple, etc.
|
|
|
|
11. Costa Rican Study, 1980; Jamaican Study, 1975; "The legal drugs for
|
|
adults, such as alcohol and tobacco...precede the use of all illicit
|
|
drugs." Source: National Academy of Sciences.
|
|
|
|
12. The FBI reports that 65-75% of criminal violence is alcohol related.
|
|
"Pacifist syndrome" testimony was given by Federal Bureau of Narcotics
|
|
Director Harry Anslinger before Congress (1948). However, the "Siler"
|
|
Study conducted by the U.S in Panama (1931) reported "no impairment"
|
|
in military personnel who smoked marijuana while off duty.
|
|
|
|
13. "The only clinically significant medical problem is that
|
|
scientifically linked to marijuana is bronchitis. Like smoking
|
|
tobacco, the treatment is the same: stop smoking." Source: Dr. Fred
|
|
Oerther, M.D.
|
|
|
|
14. Coptic study (UCLA), 1981; "There is not yet any conclusive evidence
|
|
as to whether prolonged use of marijuana causes permanent changes in
|
|
the nervous system or sustained impairment of brain function and
|
|
behavior in human beings." Source: National Academy of Sciences.
|
|
|
|
15. Source: Dr. Tod Mikuriya, _Marijuana Medical Papers_. Marijuana could
|
|
replace at least 10-20% of prescribed drugs now in use. Source: Dr.
|
|
Raphael Mechoulam. Marijuana was a major active ingredient in 40-50%
|
|
of patent medicines before its ban.
|
|
|
|
16. 1976
|
|
|
|
17. 1983
|
|
|
|
18. The U.S. Government reports that the oral dose of cannabis required to
|
|
kill a mouse is about 40,000 times the dose required to produce
|
|
symptoms of intoxication in man. Source: Lowe, _Journal of
|
|
Pharmacological and Experimental Therapeutics_, Oct. 1946.
|
|
|
|
19. In another famous study, Heath/Tulane (1974), wild monkeys were
|
|
brutally captured, then virtually suffocated in marijuana smoke over a
|
|
period of 90 days. Source: National Institute of Health.
|
|
|
|
20. Examples: the "LaGuardia" Committee Report (New York, 1944) and
|
|
President Richard Nixon's Blue Ribbon "Shafer" Commission (1972).
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
I hope that you've enjoyed reading this article and learned something from
|
|
it. If anyone has any plans for bongs, send them in to be published in the
|
|
next issue. I'm considering doing a one-time "bong review" and will need to
|
|
look at and try many different types of bongs first. :) In future articles,
|
|
I would like to write about the benefits of eating marijuana, how to grow
|
|
your own plants (hydroponically and outdoors), what type of bud (ie, various
|
|
strains from different countries) is the best, etc. However, I don't want to
|
|
be limited to writing articles on drugs. So, if you have any interesting drug
|
|
experiences that you want to share, then write an article and send it in.
|
|
The topic doesn't have to be marijuana. It can be about acid, hash, mushrooms,
|
|
or any other drug of your choice. Personally, I'd like to read some articles
|
|
on drugs from a reader's perspective for a change.
|
|
|
|
Written by THC Phreak ú Damage, INC. (C)opyright 1998.
|
|
|
|
|
|
H/P INFORMATION AND NEWS - {H/P}
|
|
How to hax0r your modem and Conferencing.
|
|
|
|
--- Save your marriage/Keep peace in your parent's house ---
|
|
--- A helpful tip for late night scanning or hacking ---
|
|
--- Courtesy of Damage, INC. ---
|
|
|
|
Are you a busy person that has a passion for h/p? Do you spend all day at
|
|
work, school or other critically important endeavours? That doesn't leave a lot
|
|
of time for h/p. So you burn the midnight oil to find some interesting codes,
|
|
and to take advantage of them.
|
|
|
|
While using a wardialier like ToneLoc for some tasks like scanning, hacking
|
|
a PBX dial-out, a VMB, or an extender you may choose to have your modem
|
|
speaker on. However, most modem speakers are very small speakers that deliver
|
|
very poor sound quality. Plus, most modems, whether internal or external, do
|
|
not have a volume control. As you probably know, ATMn is extremely limited...
|
|
either ON or OFF. :-(
|
|
|
|
If your modem's crappy little speaker is delivering its distorted sound at
|
|
4:00am, there may be some very upset family members. Especially if you don't
|
|
want them to know about your h/p activities. ;-)
|
|
|
|
Fortunately, Damage, INC. has come up with a potential solution for that
|
|
problem. If you have an old 2400 or 1200 baud modem collecting dust in an
|
|
obscure corner of your closet, it can still serve very nicely for the tasks
|
|
I listed above. After all, you aren't using your old modem to connect to a
|
|
carrier, so it doesn't matter what speed it is, right? With some very minor
|
|
modifications, you can transform your loyal old modem into a nice, silent
|
|
scanning/code hacking modem for ToneLoc... while those that live with you sleep
|
|
peacefully. That's right, it's hax0ring your old modem and putting it to good
|
|
use again.
|
|
|
|
Reminder: Please reread the Damage, INC. Disclaimer at the top of the
|
|
Damage, INC. Newsletter before doing anything. I (Shatazar)
|
|
performed the following operation on my own external Incomm 2400 baud
|
|
modem, and it operates perfectly. If you fuck up in any way, it is
|
|
your problem. Damage, INC. is not responsible for your mistakes.
|
|
|
|
Items needed:
|
|
|
|
1 - External modem (preferably an old modem you no longer use)
|
|
1 - Female mini-headphone jack (Walkman sized jack)
|
|
1 - Soldering iron/gun
|
|
1 - Screwdriver
|
|
1 - Drill with various bits
|
|
Some solder (rosin core worked fine for me)
|
|
Some electrical tape
|
|
|
|
Note: You can obtain a female mini-headphone jack from various sources. If
|
|
you have a walkman extension cord or y-adapter, you can cut off a/the
|
|
female end, strip the insulation, and bare the ends of both wires that
|
|
go into the female jack.
|
|
|
|
1> Use your screwdriver to open up your old external. Some old modems
|
|
have to actually be pried open (like my old Incomm 2400).
|
|
|
|
2> Look for two wires that goes from the modem circuit board to leads on the
|
|
modem speaker. Use your soldering iron/gun to disconnect the solder
|
|
joints between the wires and the speaker.
|
|
|
|
3> Splice/crimp together the wires from the female mini-headphone jack and
|
|
the two wires connected to the modem circuit board. Then solder the two
|
|
wires together. It is a good idea to match up wire colours whenever
|
|
possible. That way if a poor solder joint breaks, you can match up wires
|
|
quickly. Be sure that a good wetting action has occurred.
|
|
|
|
4> Using electrical tape, wrap tape around both individual wires. Then
|
|
wrap electrical tape around both wires together.
|
|
|
|
Next you can use your drill, with an appropriate bit, to snugly mount your
|
|
female mini-headphone jack into your modem case. Since modems have various
|
|
case styles, it is up to you to secure the jack to your own particular modem
|
|
case. Then put your case back together with screws or electrical tape.
|
|
|
|
With a mini-headphone jack instead of your old modem speaker, you now have many
|
|
more options when using your modem to scan with or hack. You can now plug in a
|
|
pair of Walkman headphones, a pair of those Labtec-styled speakers, or better
|
|
yet, your home stereo system into your old modem. You can now scan or hack into
|
|
the early hours of the morning without bitching and questions from the people
|
|
you live with.
|
|
|
|
Written by Shatazar ú Damage, INC. (C)opyright 1998.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Field Phreaking:
|
|
An Introduction to
|
|
Conferencing
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
In this article, I will introduce you to the world of teleconferencing. If
|
|
you're a novice phreak, it'll serve as an introduction. If you're already
|
|
an experienced phreak that's setup/participated in conferences, then look at
|
|
it as merely an overview. It might include some methods that you haven't
|
|
thought of or used already. Besides, there have already been many text files
|
|
written on conferencing over the years. Therefore, there's no reason to
|
|
go into tremendous detail and cover every type of conference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Background:
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
In the early days of phreaking, there were many large conferences with phreaks
|
|
from all over North America involved at any given time. Some of them were
|
|
fairly well known and lasted indefinitely. As in, for days, weeks or months
|
|
at a time. :) Some of them were through Telex test trunk lines that weren't
|
|
being used, which is why they lasted so long without being shut down. A phreak
|
|
could join by simply sending out (or "blowing") a 2600 HZ tone down the trunk.
|
|
All that was required back then was a blue box. There were also many known
|
|
loops and dial-in bridges etc. in which conferences were going on. But of
|
|
course, things change and have changed... And in this article, I'm not going
|
|
to explain blue boxing. Nor will I discuss "Blue Boxing in the 90s", C5
|
|
trunks, dialers like Scavenger etc. I'll leave that for another article. :)
|
|
All of the methods that I will discuss don't require a blue box.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Methods:
|
|
-------
|
|
|
|
First, I suggest that you don't setup the conference from home. Even if
|
|
you divert, and believe that you're safe, it's still not a good idea to
|
|
try it. So, to lessen your chance of being caught, beige box to set it
|
|
up, use a pay phone, or find a junction box. As always, dial an ANI to
|
|
find out the number of the line that you're using. Write it down so that you
|
|
can give it to the Conference Op when they ask what number to bill it to. To
|
|
find a line with call waiting, use *70 to check for the beeps (short dialtones).
|
|
Once you find a suitable (open/unused line) with the call waiting option, use it
|
|
to call the Conference Operator (like a 1-800 AT&T Op assisted Conference line).
|
|
Tell them that you want the conference billed to your line and give them the
|
|
number. Then, after you've hung up... call a number to a line that you know
|
|
rings and doesn't answer or a VMB that you know you can sit on few a few minutes
|
|
without being disconnected. When you hear the beeps, that's the Op calling you
|
|
to confirm. So, click over and confirm that you want to setup a conference
|
|
billed to your line. That way, the owner of the line won't hear the phone
|
|
ringing (or pickup to answer it) when the Op tries to call you for confirmation.
|
|
It's much more stealthful, safe and avoids interruptions. That's just a useful
|
|
tip for those pesky Operator call backs to confirm conferences, or call backs of
|
|
any type. But that should be self-explanatory.
|
|
|
|
There are many ways that you can setup a conference. You can use a 1-800
|
|
PBX that supports Alliance Teleconferencing. Some VMBs support conferencing
|
|
as well. Or, you can use a dial-in bridge... local loop... dial up an
|
|
AT&T Operator (or hit "0" for a local Operator) and get them to setup the
|
|
conference for you. You can setup conferences ahead of time. Just tell
|
|
the Op what dates, times (like 11:00pm for whatever time zone you're in),
|
|
the number of ports and to bill it to the number you're calling from. Or,
|
|
you can use third party billing to have the conference billed to another
|
|
number. In that case, bring a friend along with you while beige boxing.
|
|
Instruct them to answer the phone and confirm that they will accept the
|
|
charges. For example, they could answer using another line with "Phreak
|
|
Computers. Jim speaking. How may I help you?" The Op will ask if they
|
|
accept the conference being billed to them, and they just have to respond
|
|
with "Yes, I accept." Keep it short and sweet. :) You can also give them
|
|
the number of a loop for third party billing... and have a friend waiting
|
|
for the Op to call. When the Operator calls, the person on the loop should
|
|
hear a click. They should answer "Hello?" and then when asked to confirm
|
|
that a Conference can be billed to that number, answer "Yes, I accept."
|
|
If they're not nervous and sound convincing, they should have no trouble.
|
|
Then the conference will be billed to the loop. :) Or, if you can find a
|
|
"dead" (silent) line, you can use that for third party billing as well. It's
|
|
the same as above, when you hear the click, or clicks, answer with "Hello?"
|
|
and confirm the billing of the conference or anything else.
|
|
|
|
If you can find a COCOT (Customer Owned Coin Operated Telephone), which in
|
|
some areas is highly unlikely, then you can setup a conference from there
|
|
easily. But they're rare. If you do manage to find one, it'll be able to take
|
|
incoming calls and you can bill things to the pay phone. The reason is that
|
|
it won't show up as a pay phone on the Op's computer screen. But most pay
|
|
phones (at least in North America) won't allow you to receive incoming calls, so
|
|
conferences can't be billed to them using the above method. However, you can
|
|
call from a pay phone and try to use third party billing to have the conference
|
|
billed to another number (that isn't a pay phone). You just need to know the
|
|
number for billing and have a friend waiting there to answer and confirm. They
|
|
could be waiting on a loop or at a junction box or anywhere else. :)
|
|
|
|
You can conference through 1-800 PBXs as well, if you know how to dial out
|
|
from them. If you are planning on dialing out from home through a PBX in order
|
|
to conference, you should divert by dialing out through several other PBXs,
|
|
VMBs, diverters or using another method... Just enter the passcode and then
|
|
the conference code (for Alliance Teleconferencing). There are three branches,
|
|
1000, 2000, 3000. So, 100X, 200X, 300X. I won't list all of the codes though,
|
|
since they are already included in many other text files. So, if you plan on
|
|
using this method, then read some text files written strictly on Alliance
|
|
Conferencing. Some of the basic commands are listed below in this article.
|
|
|
|
Using loops to conference was explained in an earlier article in the
|
|
Damage, INC. Newsletter. Simple scan to find them and usually you just dial
|
|
the loop to join in any conferences that are going on. If you manage to find
|
|
a multi-line loop (they're rare), then you're lucky. Or, you might scan and
|
|
find that some lines are connected for the purpose of conferencing. Usually
|
|
it's best with loops if the conferences are pre-arranged. Just invite certain
|
|
people to call it at the designated time. But occasionally you'll run across
|
|
some phreaks that you don't know on loops, which is a good way to meet other
|
|
phreaks. Once in a while you might encounter an Op or a lineman using them as
|
|
well. If you don't hassle them, you might be able to carry on some interesting
|
|
conversations or social engineer them for info.
|
|
|
|
3-Way calling is another method. You can set that up on a line while beige
|
|
boxing, but obviously it's limited. Those types of small conferences are
|
|
alright if you just want to talk with a couple of phriends.
|
|
|
|
Bell also has their own conference system, as do a few other companies. There
|
|
are text files available that list numbers of various companies that offer
|
|
conference services. However, some are only available in certain areas, so
|
|
it's pointless to list them all in this article. Plus, some of the numbers
|
|
might've changed since I last checked them out... and many were located in
|
|
American cities.
|
|
|
|
You can dial "0" and get the local operator to put you through to a Conference
|
|
Operator. They can set up the conference for you. It's not the best method,
|
|
but it should work almost anywhere in a pinch.
|
|
|
|
VMBs/VMS - I'm going to leave this particular conferencing method for a future
|
|
article. I'll just tell you that some support internal conferencing. So,
|
|
get out there and explore.
|
|
|
|
In order to find some of the things listed above, you may need to do some
|
|
scanning or social engineering. That is, unless you have a list of numbers
|
|
already to use, from a text file, scan lists or a phriend. I'm not going
|
|
to provide you with AT&T Conference numbers, ANIs, PBXs, VMBs, or lines that
|
|
ring or ring busy (BUSYs) etc. Also, you should think and experiment with
|
|
some of your own ways and methods to conference as well. Not all methods
|
|
were listed in this article, so that it could remain relatively brief and
|
|
concise. Hopefully the above methods discussed are clear and understandable
|
|
to everyone though, as they aren't complex or difficult to use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Commands of AT&T's Alliance System:
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The general commands are "#" to add and "*" to cancel. Meaning, to add
|
|
someone to the conference, you press the "#" button and dial their phone
|
|
number (1+NPA+XXX-XXXX). To prevent someone from accessing it, you would
|
|
press "*" before adding them and they won't be permitted to join. Entering
|
|
"#6" and then the person's number will transfer control of the conference
|
|
to them. To get a conference operator, hit "#7". To go into silent mode,
|
|
press "#9". You'll be able to hear the others in silent mode, but they can't
|
|
hear you. And press "#" to rejoin them. While you are conferencing, "#" takes
|
|
you to command mode. While there, you are temporarily out of the conference.
|
|
The others won't be able to hear you and they can continue talking. If you want
|
|
to leave the conference, press "*" to disconnect/hang up. Those are just some
|
|
basic commands for Alliance Teleconferencing. It's very user friendly, so you
|
|
shouldn't have any problems. Obviously, these commands don't apply to other
|
|
things such as loops... in which you're not in control.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tips:
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
Don't use loops or conferences that were setup by an Operator to exchange
|
|
codes or information that could get you busted. Also, don't give out names,
|
|
phone numbers and other sensitive info while conferencing. You don't know if
|
|
they're listening in and recording or not. So, in the interest of safety, it's
|
|
not a good practice to do that.
|
|
|
|
If you are field phreaking, use the call waiting method that I described
|
|
above. It's a way to be stealthful and prevents a lot of problems from
|
|
happening while you're borrowing a line.
|
|
|
|
Be prepared. As in, if you're field phreaking then bring along everything
|
|
that you'll need. That includes a pen, paper, beige box, an ANI number to use,
|
|
AT&T Conference numbers, etc. Basically, make sure you have all that will
|
|
be required to setup a conference. You might also want to make sure some of
|
|
the people that you want involved will be around to join it. :)
|
|
|
|
Try not to be predictable. Don't keep using the same method, from the same
|
|
place, at the same time. Be as random as possible to avoid getting caught.
|
|
If you use PBXs, don't keep using the same ones over and over again etc.
|
|
In other words, be intelligent and think about what you're doing before you
|
|
do it. Otherwise, it's only a matter of time before someone puts an end
|
|
to your $1000+ conference calls. :) Just remember, they are billed by the
|
|
minute to the owner of the line that's in control of the conference. That
|
|
includes the number of ports used. The charges can really add up fast.
|
|
I shouldn't have to give you an example of what a 10 port conference for
|
|
4 hours costs, as the price per minute can vary.
|
|
|
|
You may even want to divert by dialing through a PBX, even if you're at a
|
|
pay phone or beige boxing. That is, if you're using third party billing.
|
|
If you are billing to the number that you're using, you can't divert as that
|
|
number will show up on ANI. If you beige box to setup conferences, don't keep
|
|
using the same location... or set them up at the same times etc. Obviously,
|
|
you shouldn't use the same pay phone each time you setup a conference either.
|
|
|
|
Also, don't abuse the hell out of them. And if you're setting up a conference,
|
|
it's a good idea to limit the number of ports to 10 or so. That way, there
|
|
aren't too many people talking at once. Plus, if it's setup by the Op, they
|
|
won't be as suspicious as if you say that you will require 20 ports for a
|
|
5 hour long conference. :) So, limit the amount of ports to 10 or so and
|
|
the duration to 2-3 hours. If you set it up before midnight, you'll get more
|
|
conference time automatically. Just use your own common sense in order to
|
|
avoid arousing suspicion or getting busted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusion:
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
Overall, Conferencing is a lot of phun. It's a great way to meet other phreaks,
|
|
especially ones that are in another NPA. You can exchange information, plan
|
|
meetings, or just talk to some phriends that are ld. It used to be one of
|
|
the main ways for phreaks and "telecommunications enthusiasts" to converse with
|
|
each other. But now, with Email and shit like IRC, there don't seem to be
|
|
quite as many going on anymore. Perhaps I just miss the good old days. Or,
|
|
maybe the internet is killing certain things, besides just h/p boards. Then
|
|
again, it might just be that the new generation isn't as interested in setting
|
|
up conferences, exploring the telco and using what they find. I don't know
|
|
what the reason is. However, I do hope that some people benefit from reading
|
|
this short article and become more actively involved in the phreak scene. Until
|
|
the next time, enjoy yourself and always remember to phreak safely...
|
|
|
|
Written by Blackie Lawless ú Damage, INC. (C)opyright 1998.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ú - NEWS FROM THE TRENCHES - ú
|
|
|
|
...AND JUSTICE FOR ALL is temporarily down. I've been experiencing some
|
|
hard drive problems etc. However, users can still call and download the
|
|
most recent issue by hitting "D" at the security logon menu and using a
|
|
login of "GUEST" password "DAMAGE". The board should be online and fully
|
|
operational again soon.
|
|
|
|
The next issue of the Damage, INC. Newsletter may not be released in November
|
|
due to time constraints and lack of writers. In fact, we might have to start
|
|
releasing issues on a bi-monthly basis. Personally, I'd like it to remain a
|
|
monthly newsletter, but it may be necessary to change. Unfortunately, we
|
|
weren't able to release this issue in September, as originally planned. But,
|
|
that doesn't mean we're calling it quits. You can expect new issues to be
|
|
released, regardless of any problems that we encounter. We just won't be
|
|
able to release them as frequently as in the past.
|
|
|
|
I've been attempting to recruit some quality writers for the Damage, INC.
|
|
Newsletter. However, it's not easy to find people that are willing to
|
|
spend time writing articles and make a contribution. If you're interested,
|
|
contact us. We're also looking for ansi, ascii and VGA art work. Some
|
|
people (Count Zero of iCE, greent, Deezack and others) have already made
|
|
contributions, but the web site still needs work. I'm not an ansi/VGA artist
|
|
by any means. So, if you're an artist and want to draw a Damage, INC. logo,
|
|
then it would be greatly appreciated. We can't afford to pay anything for
|
|
art work though. ;)
|
|
|
|
Information on the new Damage, INC. Distribution Sites:
|
|
|
|
board name : Eternal Flame
|
|
sysop : Public Enemy
|
|
co sysop : Midnight
|
|
nodez : 3
|
|
number : +381-(21)-612039
|
|
country : Yugoslavia
|
|
email : eflame@EUnet.yu
|
|
site url : http://www.f00d.nu
|
|
|
|
|
|
board name : the black rose tavern
|
|
number : (770) 222-9012
|
|
sysop : dominion
|
|
country : Georgia, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
board name : +SCBBS 2000
|
|
number : (916) 421-9213
|
|
sysop : Charred Remains
|
|
country : California, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, we're still looking for quality h/p related boards in various area codes,
|
|
countries and continents to become Damage, INC. Dist. Sites. So, if you're
|
|
interested, then contact us at damage_inc@mailcity.com. Make sure you include
|
|
all of the necessary info about your board (name, number, type of system, what
|
|
it supports, how long it has been online, any nets that it carries, etc.) in
|
|
Email. Any other information that you feel is important should also be
|
|
included. If your board isn't multi-node, doesn't have gigs of storage, have
|
|
affiliations etc. don't worry about it. As long as the board is stable,
|
|
supports h/p and is somewhat "established", then apply.
|
|
|
|
Fatal Vision recently quit Damage, INC. due to lack of time/interest. He
|
|
and his board, PSYCOSiS are no longer affiliated with Damage, INC. in any way.
|
|
Regretfully, it was advertised in the Crossed Wires section as being online
|
|
24/7 and was down shortly after issue #11 was released. I don't know what the
|
|
status of his board is now. It could be up or it could be down. Hopefully that
|
|
bbs advertisement didn't affect and mislead too many of our readers that
|
|
might've been trying to call it. If it did, then I apologize for the
|
|
inconvenience that it caused. Fatal Vision had assured me beforehand that it
|
|
would be up and running by the time it was advertised, but obviously that wasn't
|
|
the case since it was ringing for days... Ah well. I can't control what other
|
|
people do with their boards. Nor do I have anything to do with his board. But
|
|
in the future, only boards that are more reliable and established will be
|
|
advertised in the Damage, INC. Newsletter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTERVIEWS AND INTERROGATIONS - {INTERVIEWS}
|
|
An interview with Fringe.
|
|
|
|
<B> = BLACKENED
|
|
Fringe's answers and comments are obviously underneath what I wrote. ;)
|
|
|
|
|
|
<B> - Introduce yourself to the readers of the Damage, INC. Newsletter...
|
|
|
|
My handle is fringe, and my real name isn't. I've only been asked once before
|
|
to do an interview.. and I declined.. it was for a cheesy public access cable
|
|
show.. This seems a little more subtle, so, hey, I'll go wacky.
|
|
basix on me: I tend to reside in the chicagoland area. I'm the editor of the
|
|
pimp e-zine (also a writer).. and I'm 4'2", 600 lbs. I had to add the last
|
|
part in.. so no one plans on stalking me.
|
|
|
|
<B> - How long have you been involved in the h/p scene?
|
|
|
|
I've been involved with the h/p scene for quite some time. During the
|
|
late 80's, early 90's, I was more into phreaking then anything. When I was in
|
|
7th grade, a lineman was doing a ringback on a payfone, and was actually cool
|
|
enough to tell me what he did. I had the insane need to learn more.
|
|
Eventually, I think it was in 91.., I got my first computer.
|
|
|
|
It was a Commodore 64.. and a lightning storm eventually took its life.
|
|
To this day, I still think it beats out any microsoft based boxes. Presently, I
|
|
use an amiga 600 to do all my stuff.. and a coupla 286's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
<B> - How long has your board, Apocalypse 2000 been online? Describe what
|
|
it's about and what types of things it supports.
|
|
|
|
I've only been a sysop of apocalypse 2000 for about 4 years, but the
|
|
BBS itself has been around since 1992. Subhuman and Jello Biafra are the
|
|
creators of it and did they ever pick a fitting name. It is utilized for the
|
|
free open discussion of hacking, phreaking, conspiracies, politics, narcotics,
|
|
and almost any other topic that relates to the h/p scene of today. We do not
|
|
have warez, and we cannot permit the posting of codes of any sort. There have
|
|
been some "situations" in the past that have brought us to a more paranoid
|
|
state.
|
|
|
|
If you want to find out more about the BBS, http://dope.org/pimp/apoc2k/
|
|
and on the web site, you will find a timeline, email links to all the sysops,
|
|
and any news in regards to the ssh connection we are setting up to the BBS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
<B> - When was PIMP magazine started? What is it about? What are the goals?
|
|
|
|
Well.. probe industries was just kind of a company name myself and
|
|
an exfriend used when going on various missions (you know what I mean, if you
|
|
don't .. nevermind). Over time,.. I had started writing philes.. and noticed
|
|
the degradation of quality ezines in the scene. So many had come out of
|
|
nowhere and had so much idiocy in them. How to blow up your school. How
|
|
to make the ereet red b0x 10 different ways. How to beige box off of your
|
|
neighbors line. Idiocy.. there was a complete loss of ethix in everything
|
|
I was reading. So, we just started getting together anything I had written,
|
|
and any more dox that we could and created "probe industries magazine philes,
|
|
aka pimp". About 2 years ago, I set up the web site (http://dope.org/pimp/)
|
|
and although the scale of readers and writers is small, the magazine stays
|
|
true to its nature and has some very valuable resources. The goal of the
|
|
magazine is to educate, to spread the word, yet to do it discreetly. The
|
|
magazine stays strictly dedicated to h/p and conspiracies or other things of
|
|
importance to the h/p underworld.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<B> - How has PIMP changed since the first issue was released? Basically,
|
|
how has it evolved?
|
|
|
|
The magazine format and depth has changed a lot. The amount of writers
|
|
has gone from myself to about 8 or so people. The exfriend has since left and
|
|
lost the affiliation due to his lack of respect for people and business
|
|
within the group. We haven't heard from him. The original issue just had a
|
|
lot of dox on programming various cell phones and was initially created /
|
|
released to start the magazine. I even went as far as to put some cbi dialups
|
|
I found in that issue just to make it seem more valuable. Since then, thru
|
|
time and more data, we have gotten a lot more organized and have various
|
|
sections for articles and inpho. I try to include scene news in every issue,
|
|
but by the time it gets out, it's usually old news. I have no idea what the
|
|
future plans are for it.. in fact, a few months ago, the magazine was dead.
|
|
There was nothing new to be said.. no one had anything they wanted to submit,
|
|
and I had little time to do anything myself. I'd like to establish some form
|
|
of release date,. but there really never has been any. Whenever we can
|
|
get it out we do. If we get something decent submitted, it's added.
|
|
|
|
|
|
<B> - As the editor of PIMP, do you find that it's difficult to get
|
|
people to write articles and contribute? And has it been difficult to
|
|
keep releasing issues?
|
|
|
|
It all depends what mood people are in. I'm trying hard not to rip on
|
|
anyone here, but I have noticed that a vast majority of the h/p world has turned
|
|
to living on the net, and it's not all that good of a thing. I have qualms
|
|
with it. Scr1pt k1dd13s are everywhere, and no one believes in learning
|
|
anything more than compiling c programs to attack sites.. very few bother even
|
|
learning unix and networking, except to get around. It's been extremely
|
|
difficult to keep releasing issues and getting articles. I'm not the only
|
|
sysop of apocalypse 2k so that hasn't really slowed me down. The web site
|
|
(dope.org) is run by stash, a good friend and pimp who has given me space for
|
|
all these pages. The pimp site, apoc site, and my own page are all worked on
|
|
in my free time. Web stuff is part of what I do for a living.. so it takes me
|
|
little time. Subhuman / Devolve has spent an insane amount of time doing the
|
|
graphix for both the pimp and apoc sites. I just set em up. The greatest
|
|
difficulty in all, is just finding new things to put in the zine; keeping
|
|
with its theme.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<B> - What does it mean to be a PIMP?
|
|
|
|
... y0wza, hard question. To be a writer for pimp.. means that you want to
|
|
broaden other peoples horizons mentally.. and to let them know inphormation
|
|
that isn't normally all too easy to get. At times, the zine can be very
|
|
technically oriented. It may sound hippyish when I say this.. but it's all
|
|
about bringing the power to the people.. the scene.. the h/p underworld..
|
|
those that live in the grey area like we do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
<B> - Can anyone write articles and submit them to PIMP? Where should they
|
|
be sent? How can people contact you and/or PIMP?
|
|
|
|
Yes, in fact it's encouraged. All submissions can be sent to
|
|
pimp@dope.org and will be reviewed by various established members for accuracy
|
|
and if it substantial to the mag. On the norm, most everything we get, gets
|
|
published.
|
|
|
|
|
|
<B> - How does someone join PIMP as a member? Can people apply or is
|
|
becoming a member by invitation only?
|
|
|
|
If there is some way you would like to help out with the magazine,
|
|
then chances are you can become a part. Admitted, there are core members
|
|
that have known each other for years, and don't necessarily trust everyone
|
|
else as much. Basically, if you want to join and have something to offer,
|
|
it's all good. An email gets sent out to all current members to let them
|
|
know who is joining, and to ask if anyone has any problems with said
|
|
individual joining. Usually, there isn't a problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
<B> - Are you still actively involved in h/p? What do you think of the
|
|
current h/p scene? How is the local scene in Chicago?
|
|
|
|
I am,.. and I'm not. I have had a discrepancy with ameritech for
|
|
almost two years now and do not have my own landline. I partake in various
|
|
projects here and there and still read, study, learn as much as I can. The
|
|
current h/p scene I have problems with. Too much is taken for granted.
|
|
too many people are trusting too many other people way too much. I have a
|
|
few contacts i've established over the years in various countries,.. and I
|
|
trust them somewhat.. but I think today's scene is littered with script kiddies
|
|
and aol hackers. Kids who think compiling a c program to attack some site is
|
|
hacking. Not once taking a look at the code and really trying to understand
|
|
what is taking place.
|
|
|
|
The local scene in chicago is doing pretty well. A lot of new people
|
|
have come about in the past few years, and an even greater amount have
|
|
disappeared. It seems that every coupla years, the scene evolves massively
|
|
out here. Everytime it does, some good comes out of it and some bad. There
|
|
have been a few little narc kiddies and some people who have violated other
|
|
peoples well being out here.. but those situations get handled as they come..
|
|
and they just remind everyone why you can't intially give anyone trust.
|
|
Trust should be earned. (in my opinion).
|
|
|
|
|
|
<B> - Do you read any h/p zines? If so, please list a few of them.
|
|
|
|
Truthfully, I read a bare minimum. I wish I could find more out there of
|
|
substance.. I once in a while read 2600 for laughs, phrack for a few good
|
|
articles out of the mag.. and the one zine I hold true respect for is 9x..
|
|
stash's dope.org hosts them as well (http://www2.dope.org/9x). That group
|
|
has come a long way and has helped to keep things real. I hate using the
|
|
term real, but it is extremely fitting. I'm probably missing mags that I
|
|
do read.. but I cannot think of any others that are really all that good.
|
|
Most are a joke.
|
|
|
|
Think about blacklisted 411,.. how to be a theif is basically all it's about.
|
|
|
|
<B> - Which h/p groups, if any do you respect?
|
|
|
|
Hmm. Tricky. I respected AoD's passion (academy of deception, I was a member
|
|
in 95 or so..).. amitech, for knowing what they were doing. Their one bbs in
|
|
516... was nice while it lasted. 9x, as I said above, I respect for staying
|
|
true to the scene.. one of the last few diehard mags. Most of the groups I
|
|
knew weren't necessarily organizations, but scenes in other countries and
|
|
cities. 516 had a great scene for years while I frequent'ed it. As did 514
|
|
(underworld was a damn good board).. as did +31 (the netherlands had a great
|
|
bbs scene).. as did germany.. the list can go on for a long time. I pretty
|
|
much gave a ton of shout outs to boards I used to call on my web page for
|
|
bbses. (http://dope.org/fringe/bbses.html)
|
|
|
|
|
|
<B> - Have you ever... at any time considered joining another group?
|
|
If so, which one(s) and why?
|
|
|
|
I was part of academy of deception (AoD).. a group that never really took
|
|
off due to lack of organization (but our hearts were in it haha). It was
|
|
dedicated to bringing people up to speed with the current h/p scene and also
|
|
to keep things afloat. the groups whq was on the digital fallout in 516 years
|
|
back. Eventually, edgewise took the board down (he had to go to college or
|
|
sumthin.. damns it) and the group fell. I considered submitting dox to 9x,..
|
|
however, whenever I get something new.. I usually end up throwing it in pimp.
|
|
Eventually i'll get some dox to substance for 9x. We're all associates.
|
|
There is no competition.. it's all about free inpho.. and inpho meant to be
|
|
free. At this time, I don't plan to join any other groups.. because most
|
|
groups of today are just so people can attempt to make a name for themselves.
|
|
I won't bring up specifics.. but everyone wants to make some idiot claim to
|
|
fame, so they can feel 'eleet' and be bad asses when it comes to hax0r events
|
|
like defcon. In reality, most of these people are idiots and script kids and
|
|
wouldn't know the difference between a vax dialup and a rolm dialup. It's
|
|
funny how many groups and people 'affiliated' with these groups that there
|
|
are out there now. I remember some friends talking to a speaker at defcon
|
|
who really didn't know his head from his ass. But somehow, he was deemed a
|
|
badass and looked up to by all the other script kids because he 'must' be
|
|
sooo knowledgeable.. because he knows people that also are supposedly so
|
|
knowledgable. I think a claim to fame for any reason in the h/p underworld
|
|
just proves what an idiot you are. And I think 99.99% of the groups created
|
|
in this day and age are created just for that reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
<B> - Which web sites do you usually frequent? ;)
|
|
|
|
dope.org in all aspects (check out my web page dope.org/fringe
|
|
for a tree of the dope phamily), disinfo.com, impropaganda.com, phreak.org,
|
|
geek-girl.com, freerepublic.com, zdnet.com, x86.org, and i'm sure there's
|
|
plenty more I just cannot think of right now.
|
|
|
|
<B> - Do you want to share any memorable hacking/phreaking experiences?
|
|
(achievements, strange things found, memorable or interesting hacks,
|
|
meetings, hacker cons, etc.)
|
|
|
|
Interesting things found.. I didn't find this, but I'm pretty sure
|
|
another sysop from the area did (i'm trying hard to keep names outta this).
|
|
Most C.O.'s in chicagoland have a dialup loop to the PA system. The loop is
|
|
always located at the area code and prefix of that particular CO, and the last
|
|
four digits are 9951, and 9952. (ie, 708-xxx-9951 is one end of the loop).
|
|
Useful they are, but you will be broadcasting on the PA system while you talk.
|
|
Other things found.. very very very many useful computer systems.. locally and
|
|
far away.. however i'll stop myself right there. Because I really don't want
|
|
to go into detail on any of that.
|
|
|
|
I've found that you can con any cell one operator into believing you
|
|
are the legitimate user. Same goes for ameritech cell operators. I recall
|
|
having been out beige boxing in 8th grade.. and a gang fight broke out all
|
|
over that neighborhood. We didn't know what was worse.. the gang war or the
|
|
cops everywhere. Achievements.. is a lousy thing to think of.. for me,
|
|
personally, I have achieved almost everything i've set out to do.. but I
|
|
don't think achievements you make in h/p should ever be public knowledge
|
|
like this. It tends to make everything too glorified and glamourized.
|
|
The most interesting thing i've learned over the years is the con game
|
|
implemented within anything you do. It helps in taking over anything..
|
|
and that is a tool everyone should learn.
|
|
|
|
The worst thing that has probably ever happened to me while trashing
|
|
was coming back from a great sprint CO with a lot of ess dox. My timing belt
|
|
broke halfway home so we got picked up.. only our new ride lost control while
|
|
exiting the expressway and launched off the expressway, taking out a light
|
|
post and rolling with the van ending upside down. People were hurt, ess
|
|
dox were all over the expressway, and it just plain sucked. A very
|
|
depressing night on many levels.
|
|
|
|
Call me superstitous, but I will never hit that sprint CO again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
<B> - Have you ever been busted? Or, do you know anyone that's been busted?
|
|
If so, would you like to describe the event, the circumstances of the bust
|
|
and the conclusion?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't ever been busted.. although I've been threatened by an
|
|
exfriend/cokehead that he'd turn me in. He changed his mind. Once, on a
|
|
board in germany, the sysop got a message from an administrator asking who was
|
|
dialing into their router and calling to his system. He posted it in the
|
|
public bases. it went on about ameritech doing an investigation blah blah blah..
|
|
luckily, he did that. I never got in trouble for it.. and I know ma bell ended
|
|
up paying for it. Which to me, isn't a violation of ethix, because ma bell is
|
|
a money sucking bitch anyways.
|
|
|
|
As for anyone else who has been busted.. there have been a few scares
|
|
out here.. and a few times people got busted for telco heists. A friend even
|
|
got pinched once for cell cables. There's been various other arrests of
|
|
friends and I have seen a lot of friends go to prison (not necessarily for
|
|
h/p related crimes though). Anyways, their business is their business.. and
|
|
to put it simple enough, if you are doing something deemed extremely illegal..
|
|
try to keep it under wraps.. don't let the world be your alliance in whatever
|
|
you are doing. I truly, TRULY, do not partake in any illegal activities now..
|
|
Why? because I have too many other things to worry about. And if I ever did..
|
|
I made sure of my surroundings and who I could trust. We once had a sysadmin
|
|
scanning our message bases on apocalypse 2k for his ISP's name.. he found it..
|
|
plenty.. and we found him.. and since little things like that happen here and
|
|
there in time, we have tightened up security.
|
|
|
|
I recall the sysop of extreme dreams busting into chat with me one day..
|
|
he had news crews at his house and people wanting to interview him. We had a
|
|
good laff together.. then police came.. Why? Someone downloaded a file on how
|
|
to make a coke machine bomb from his board. Naturally, he had a bbs ad
|
|
attached to the bottomed of this. However, the person who downloaded this
|
|
decided to fax it to some offices.. and scared people from using the coke
|
|
machines. They tried to blame extreme dreams for the cause. It's a tricky
|
|
world.. everyone needs a scapegoat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<B> - Do you want to mention any boards that you call or people in the scene
|
|
that you know?
|
|
|
|
There's a lot of people out there I truly appreciate in the scene..
|
|
|
|
Werd to the people who i've known for years and have been true to the scene:
|
|
subhuman, stash, silo, jello biafra, trainwreck, insane lineman, goodbytes,
|
|
burning horizon, nothing absolutely and absolutely nothing, luthor, special-k,
|
|
morpheus, jopiter, omega, and van hauser.
|
|
|
|
Shouts to: everyone on the dope.org boxes, apocalypse 2k, the centre, and for
|
|
further shout-outs, bbs shout-outs, etc, hit my web page..
|
|
http://dope.org/fringe/greets.html and http://dope.org/fringe/bbses.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
<B> - Are there any other interesting h/p experiences or general comments
|
|
that you have and wish to share?
|
|
|
|
Learn for the know-how and knowledge.. not for the abuse.
|
|
Don't consider anyone who's been around for a long time to outweigh you in wit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
One norm of the h/p underworld:
|
|
|
|
Anyone with half a brain would stay loyal in the h/p underworld.
|
|
I would much rather be beaten by feds then to ever turn narc on an associate.
|
|
There is not only the factor that I respect my associates, but the factor that
|
|
when you turn on phamily, your life is much more endangered.. and you are better
|
|
off dead. You are never safe, no matter what they tell you. And to all those
|
|
kids that have turned tail and ran behind the badge of ignorance, leaving the
|
|
country wouldn't even help you.
|
|
|
|
The h/p underworld has no barriers; law enforcement protection does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
<B> - Thanks for agreeing to be interviewed Fringe. I'm sure that our readers
|
|
will enjoy reading this interview and gain some insight about you and PIMP.
|
|
To everyone that hasn't already checked out dope.org, I suggest that you do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR - {LETTERS}
|
|
Feedback about the Damage, INC. Newsletter:
|
|
|
|
This is your forum for feedback. Direct all comments, questions, suggestions
|
|
and requests to damage_inc@mailcity.com. There's been a noticable lack of
|
|
user response in recent months. Hopefully, this issue will provoke a few
|
|
quality letters to the editor. Otherwise, this section may be discontinued.
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Have no phear MA$E is here :) You might have noticed I used the quote of the
|
|
Damage, INC. Newsletter #11 in this message because in my eyes, it reflected a
|
|
great newsletter which goes on the top of my list as one of my favourite.
|
|
|
|
This letter can be used as feedback if Blackie Lawless chooses. The reason I
|
|
say Blackie Lawless, is because I have to tip my hat off to his articles in
|
|
this issue. The Conspiracies And Coverups section was one of my favourite
|
|
articles, and probobly one of the best in all of the Damage, INC. Newsletters
|
|
past articles, whether it be, h/p articles, creative writing, etc. Since I
|
|
know alot about area-51 (also the name of my board) and read up on alot of
|
|
conspiracies this article really showed that you knew what you were talking
|
|
about (I was thinking of writing an article on MJ-12, Hanger-18, Area-51 to
|
|
clarify to everyone what it was since alot of people ask me, but their is no
|
|
need now, since your article made it perfectly clear and offered a great
|
|
opinion on the subject). I liked the fact that you mentioned some of the
|
|
projects (which is hard to find text files on) put more then one project
|
|
together in your article (Plato, Sigma, Redlight, etc.), and that's what made
|
|
it quality. All of your articles to date have been quality man. On the top
|
|
of my list (in no order) are; Field Phreaking: Junction Boxes, Tips on
|
|
Scanning 1-800s (which benefitted me personally because I havent done any
|
|
scanning due to my telephone status: rotary/pulse dialing, so that benefitted
|
|
me, and if it benefitted me, chances are, it benefitted other newbies who are
|
|
going to get into it once they have learned the basics) and of course your
|
|
article on PBXs tops them all for me since I am a newbie that also helped me
|
|
and will help others :) I am sure there are a few I am missing, and can't
|
|
remember at this time. I guess what I am saying is all of your articles have
|
|
been quality and wanted to write this feedback since no one has said much at
|
|
all about your work and wanted to make sure that people understand that your
|
|
articles are addictive but not lethal, you keep us honest, and we ain't seen
|
|
nothin' yet.
|
|
|
|
MA$E
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
Thanks alot for the generous compliments you've given me in your feedback.
|
|
Although it feels good to be singled out for my accomplishments in the
|
|
Damage, INC. Newsletter, it takes the efforts of every active Damage, INC.
|
|
Member in order to keep the quality level high. As for the inclusion of this
|
|
feedback being up to me, it was actually up to BLACKENED. He is the Editor of
|
|
the Damage, INC. Newsletter, so it was his decision. However, being the
|
|
selfless individual that he is, he's given up his soapbox for two months now,
|
|
since most Damage, INC. feedback seems to be directed to individual members for
|
|
some reason. :) In any event, hopefully BLACKENED, Shatazar and THC Phreak
|
|
get some feedback on their articles someday...
|
|
|
|
I'm pleased that you found my Conspiracies and Coverups article about the
|
|
Majestic Twelve to be informative and factual. I look at myself as being a
|
|
well-rounded person and not just involved in one interest, like h/p. The
|
|
great UFO conspiracies do interest me, and I've spent many hours reading
|
|
materials about that subject. My main intention was to enlighten some people
|
|
about the fact that there is evidence that the U.S. government is covering up
|
|
the alien presence on Earth. As for including information on the various
|
|
government projects, I felt that it was important for readers to see the big
|
|
picture, how the projects link together, etc. As for Hangar-18 and Area 51, I
|
|
didn't discuss those topics in any amount of detail. Future articles could be
|
|
written about those topics, so if you still want to give it a try, go ahead.
|
|
|
|
Concerning your pulse dialing situation, you should definitely remedy that ASAP.
|
|
I'm glad you have benefitted from my h/p related articles though. I hope that
|
|
other newbies gained something from them as well. Continue reading and learning
|
|
and I'll continue to write articles. That's right, you ain't seen nothin' yet!
|
|
|
|
Written by Blackie Lawless ú Damage, INC. (C)opyright 1998.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OBJECTIVE OPINIONS - {OPINIONS}
|
|
Gun Control = No Control.
|
|
|
|
There is a war that is being waged right now, but it is not with guns. Rather
|
|
guns are the victims of the war, not the weapon of choice. The way the insane,
|
|
liberal gun control lobbyists speak, they make it sound like guns are living,
|
|
sentient demons that slaughter innocent people every second of every day. "Guns
|
|
kill!" is their greatest slogan. I've heard their paranoid opinions, based on
|
|
misinformation and corrupt, hidden agendas. Now it's my turn to share my
|
|
opinions regarding guns and gun control with all of the readers of the
|
|
Damage, INC. Newsletter.
|
|
|
|
First of all, do guns kill people? Haha... the last time I looked at a gun, it
|
|
didn't seem animated or evil to me. In fact, it didn't look threatening at all.
|
|
The obvious fact that gun lobbyists refuse to acknowledge and absorb is that
|
|
*people kill people*. A person can use a gun to kill another person. That is
|
|
true... but a person can use his hands, or virtually any kind of object (both
|
|
natural or man-made) to kill another human being. A gun is nothing more or
|
|
less than a tool that a person can use to preserve his life if reasonably
|
|
threatened. Guns should not be viewed as murderous demons, but as a tool that
|
|
enables people to defend themselves, instead of being a helpless victim.
|
|
|
|
The next bit of propaganda that the gun control lobbyists spew are guns and
|
|
"our" (meaning "society's") children. How many commercials, TV programs, and
|
|
movies have you seen where a stupid, careless parent places a loaded handgun
|
|
in the bedside table? Then the little kid blows away his little sister or
|
|
brother. Yes, it does happen occasionally in reality. However, it is my firm
|
|
belief that those kind of accidental killings aren't necessary. First of all,
|
|
the children have not been educated on how to properly handle a firearm.
|
|
Parents should teach, and allow their children to handle and properly
|
|
discharge guns. The ignorance and naiveness of a child should be eliminated
|
|
through education... not depravation. An educated child may not have the
|
|
curious desire to play with a handgun after its hiding place is discovered.
|
|
The child would know that it is not a plaything... but a tool to defend his
|
|
family from home invasion.
|
|
|
|
A child's home education of firearms should be *supplemented* by the school
|
|
system. Children in primary school should gain further practice on how to
|
|
handle and use firearms in a Physical Education course. I also believe that
|
|
high school students should also be able to take firearms courses to improve
|
|
their proficiency with firearms. Once children and young adults are armed with
|
|
information, they'll be better prepared if they arm themselves with a poorly
|
|
hidden gun, or even if their own lives were threatened. Secondly, parents could
|
|
use gun safes with a touch lock that's activated by a combination of presses
|
|
in the proper sequence to make it more difficult for ignorant children to gain
|
|
access to the handgun. The gun could be stored safely away in the parents
|
|
room in the safe behind a locked door as well for added security. Yet, the
|
|
handgun would still be close by and handy in case of an emergency.
|
|
|
|
What do you think of that? Are you up in arms in protest? If so, ask
|
|
yourselves "Why?" Why would it be harmful for children to become knowledgable,
|
|
comfortable and proficient with firearms? Is it because, deep down you have
|
|
no faith and trust in your children, or children around you? Or do feel that it
|
|
would take too much time and effort to educate... and it would be easier to go
|
|
with the grain and eliminate access to guns of any type? If that is your
|
|
attitude, then perhaps you should give up your parental rights instead of
|
|
supporting your children's ignorance of firearms. Afterall, wouldn't that be
|
|
the easy way out?
|
|
|
|
Fortunately, there is an example of a country that requires and encourages
|
|
their citizens to be armed and ready. In Switzerland, the citizens are the
|
|
army. From the time a Swiss child is born, he or she is used to the presence of
|
|
firearms. They may see their father cleaning and inspecting his military
|
|
assault rifle and ammunition in their home. After all, it is in the Swiss
|
|
Constitution of 1874 that all men must keep their military rifle and ammunition
|
|
in their homes, so they can mobilize quickly in the event that Switzerland is
|
|
invaded. After seeing the state of decay in Canada and the United States, it
|
|
is refreshing to see a country that has faith and trust in their own citizens.
|
|
Swiss citizens can possess long guns without any kind of certificate or
|
|
registration. Registration is only reserved for machine guns, sub-machine
|
|
guns, howitzers, anti-aircraft or anti-tank weapons, and some handguns. Despite
|
|
the fact that every Swiss house has some kind of firearm, gun crime is very low.
|
|
Perhaps that has something to do with the fact that there aren't many weak,
|
|
helpless people that are unable to arm and defend themselves in that country.
|
|
|
|
Citizens defending themselves using guns. In my opinion, that is what
|
|
governments, cops, lobbyists, and their allies are really fighting against.
|
|
They want to take away our greatest tool for defending our lives, our property,
|
|
and our freedom. A citizenry that isn't armed is vulnerable and weak to
|
|
exploitation. It isn't a coincidence that as the government and their
|
|
supporters fight to strip us of legal ownership of firearms, cops want body
|
|
armour, hollow point bullets, fully-automatic assault rifles, etc. An unarmed
|
|
population that relies on the police for protection becomes a police state.
|
|
|
|
Depending on where you live, the freedoms we used to enjoy, and still partially
|
|
enjoy, were earned by either ridding ourselves of oppressive internal forces, or
|
|
defense from outside forces. However, with no obvious enemy threatening western
|
|
nations, the war is within borders now. Once again there is a battle for
|
|
freedom. The government passes laws and edicts in attempts to control our
|
|
actions and our thoughts. The cops are becoming more aggressive, both in
|
|
weaponry and attitude. It is obvious that the very people that are supposed to
|
|
be representing us and serving us do not trust us. How do most idiots react to
|
|
that blatant disrespect and total mistrust? They cave in, fearing to sacrifice
|
|
what our forefathers sacrificed in wars of independence or national defense.
|
|
Well, in my opinion freedom is not free. Freedom must be fought for, and guns
|
|
are one important tool that can help individuals (or individuals that band
|
|
together) in that fight. To those of you that believe in gun control and
|
|
bannings, I have one final comment for you all. If you don't want to stand up
|
|
for your rights, that's fine... just don't tread on me and my rights. I would
|
|
use a gun only in self-defense. However, if you would rather trust Big Brother
|
|
and the Thought Police over me and others that believe in freedom, then you'll
|
|
get what you deserve when you're rights are all gone. Because when freedom is
|
|
gone, so will all of us freedom fighters.
|
|
|
|
Written by Shatazar ú Damage, INC. (C)opyright 1998.
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPORTS FROM THE FRONT - {REPORTS}
|
|
Several opinionated articles on firearms:
|
|
|
|
If you write/find any interesting articles, send them to us at
|
|
damage_inc@mailcity.com with a subject of "article submission". ;)
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
How To Register ANY Firearm Under C-68
|
|
|
|
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 22:10:32 -0600
|
|
From: "David A. Tomlinson"
|
|
Subject: How To Register ANY Firearm Under C-68
|
|
|
|
RULES FOR REGISTRATION UNDER BILL C-68
|
|
DOWNLOAD, PRINT, COPY AND DISTRIBUTE; FORWARD AND POST EVERYWHERE.
|
|
|
|
What follows is education on the coming situation when C-68 comes into
|
|
force. From the viewpoint of the NFA, we must do our best to protect
|
|
Canadians from both criminal charges and inconvenience that may arise from
|
|
the new registration system. It is unfortunate WHEN our activities
|
|
conflict with the plans and desires of the government and its bureaucracies,
|
|
but the defective legislation has that result.
|
|
|
|
Where legislation is this complex and difficult, there will always be
|
|
opportunities concealed within it. Where complex and difficult legislation
|
|
is written by people who do not understand the theory and practice of
|
|
regulatory well enough, there will be many opportunities.
|
|
|
|
Looking back at the development of firearms control law, it is obvious that
|
|
the writing of those laws by unqualified persons has been a major and
|
|
continuing defect. The loss of 20 per cent of all registered firearms
|
|
(under the "re-register every 5 years" plan of 1939) in 1945 was a red
|
|
warning that the registration system did not and could not work. The change
|
|
made in 1950 (making registration permanent) was a cover-up. In 1950, if
|
|
that legislation had not passed, the second "re-register every 5-years"
|
|
wave of re-registration would have conclusively proven that the system did not
|
|
-- could not -- keep track of registered firearms. The bureaucracies
|
|
persuaded the government to prevent the test from being made, and that was a
|
|
serious error. We are still suffering from the results of that coverup.
|
|
|
|
The continuing problems include:
|
|
|
|
(a) The Department of Justice does NOT understand administrative law,
|
|
and, in particular, the rules regarding the establishment, powers,
|
|
limitations and structure of the system of indpependent quasi-judicial
|
|
one-person licensing tribunals. Those tribunals are established by the
|
|
administrative and regulatory law improperly embedded in the current
|
|
Criminal Code and soon to be embedded in the revised Criminal Code and the
|
|
Firearms Act. A crash program should be instituted by the CFC to determine
|
|
where its proposals are in violation of basic principles of administrative
|
|
and regulatory law.
|
|
|
|
I have suggested to the CFC that when such a program is started, that an
|
|
OUTSIDE lawyer or an OBJECTIVE lawyer new to the firearms field be
|
|
consulted, and that the NFA be asked to brief that lawyer on some of the
|
|
vulnerabilities the NFA has already detected and plans to attack. (This
|
|
paper would be a good starting point for him or her.) It will be most
|
|
embarrassing if much of the work now in progress turns out to be wasted
|
|
because those limitations were not considered, and much of the current CFC
|
|
output winds up being ruled illegal.
|
|
|
|
(b) The writers of definitions in the Firearms Act and revised
|
|
Criminal Code failed to deal with the fundamental problems caused by
|
|
defective definitions of "firearm", "weapon", "offensive weapon",
|
|
"restricted weapon/firearm", "prohibited weapon/firearm", etc. when they
|
|
had the chance. The C-68 definitions are actually worse than those in current
|
|
law. Those defects will give rise to the following patten of (legitimate!)
|
|
behavior by the firearms community.
|
|
|
|
What follows is NOT an attack on what the CFC and Registrar want to do and
|
|
plan to do. It is a PROTECTION of the interests of the 40 per cent of
|
|
Canadian households that contain at least one recreational firearm. Where
|
|
the plans of the Minister, the CFC and/or the Registrar can and/or will
|
|
have bad effects on Canadians, we have the right and the duty to tell Canadians
|
|
how to minimize the harmful effects that threaten them. That is one of the
|
|
NFA's major reasons for existence.
|
|
|
|
This is an educational campaign. "Where the law is written badly, the
|
|
results will NEVER be the desired results."
|
|
|
|
It is particularly unfortunate that we share common goals for DESIRED
|
|
RESULTS of firearms control legislation. In our view, legislation that
|
|
WILL have those desired results cannot be drafted by people who do not have the
|
|
required intimate knowledge of firearms, firearms owners, firearms users,
|
|
and the firearms community's complex interactions.
|
|
|
|
Where that intimate knowledge is ignored, and the advice of police
|
|
agencies, lawyers and anti-firearms activists is taken, the resulting
|
|
legislation will be FULL of opportunites. In the material below, you will
|
|
see how some of the C-68 opportunities will be used.
|
|
|
|
The current CFC plan is to have YOU apply to register your rifle or
|
|
shotgun, supplying ALL the information that will wind up on the
|
|
registration certificate. They do NOT plan to examine the firearm, so
|
|
EVERY ERROR ON THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE IS YOUR ERROR, AND MAY RESULT IN A
|
|
FIREARMS ACT SECTION 106/109 CRIMINAL CHARGE AGAINST YOU when the firearm IS
|
|
examined -- as it will be, the next time it is transferred.
|
|
|
|
1. It is dangerous (due to the possibility that they may prosecute you
|
|
under Firearms Act section 106 and 109) to give registration officials ANY
|
|
information that will appear on the registration certificate when you first-
|
|
register a rifle or shotgun, unless you are a WORLD-CLASS expert in firearms
|
|
AND know EXACTLY what ALL registration officicals WANT on the registration
|
|
certificate. Any "error" of yours can result in charges the next time the
|
|
firearm is transferred. It is a criminal offence under Firearms Act
|
|
sections 106(1) and (3) and 109 to make any "assertion of belief" while
|
|
applying for a registration certificate if that "assertion of belief" later
|
|
TURNS OUT to be "false or misleading" -- IN THE OPINION OF SOME LATER
|
|
OFFICIAL, WHEN YOU ARE TRANSFERRING THE FIREARM TO A NEW OWNER. This is a
|
|
VERY dangerous area for making ANY error -- not because charges are LIKELY,
|
|
but because abusive enforcement is VERY common and this is an easy area to
|
|
lay charges. Even if found innocent, the charged person will be out
|
|
thousands of dollars in legal costs.
|
|
|
|
2. Therefore, all future registrations of rifles and shotguns should
|
|
contain the MINIMUM possible information supplied by YOU, and should
|
|
include NO information where there might be ANY doubt or possibility of error.
|
|
The registration officials (presumably) know precisely what they want to call
|
|
your firearm -- so let THEM decide what entries should be put on your
|
|
registration certificate.
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Regardless of what is stamped into the metal on a firearm, error is
|
|
likely. It may say "Browning" and "Ogden Utah and Montreal Canada" on it,
|
|
but what should the "Make" and "Manufacturer" entries be if it
|
|
was "Made in Japan" or "Made in Belgium" by some known or unknown factory?
|
|
THINK! Are you CERTAIN that the calibre stamped on the barrel of your rifle is correct,
|
|
and that it was never re-chambered by a gunsmith? That you are looking
|
|
at a Serial number, and not an assembly number, patent number, owner's number,
|
|
military number, or is therefore the WRONG number? If in ANY doubt,
|
|
enter "UNKNOWN." That entry can save you court costs -- and up to five years
|
|
imprisonment.
|
|
|
|
3. Under the new registration system, they plan to add "enough extra
|
|
information to provide unique registration." That "extra" information will,
|
|
in most cases, have to come from "spare part" components -- like the
|
|
Remington-Rand "spare-part" slide on my Colt .45, in which the "frame or
|
|
receiver" (the ONLY part that is, in and of itself, a "firearm" by
|
|
Criminal Code definition) was made by -- Colt!
|
|
|
|
4. If "Remington Rand" appears on my registration certificate, then I
|
|
cannot change the slide without being required to re-register (by
|
|
notification, at the least) the "firearm."
|
|
|
|
5. That, obviously, prevents easy interchange of "spare parts" when
|
|
modifying, customizing or repairing my "firearm."
|
|
|
|
NOTE: In rifles and shotguns, it can prevent rechambering, rebarrelling,
|
|
customization, changing a calibre, etc., etc. without re-registration or at
|
|
least formal notification that a change has been made. Where they accept
|
|
formal notification instead of re-registration, YOU have no proof that you
|
|
complied with a requirement, and YOU CAN BE CHARGED FOR THEIR
|
|
ERRORS. It is far better to PREVENT charges than to fight them.
|
|
|
|
6. Therefore, in order to prevent the prevention of interchange, all future
|
|
registrations should be of firearms stripped to "frame or receiver" (with or
|
|
without small "unidentified" parts normally found IN a "frame or receiver").
|
|
|
|
7. There is no requirement in law for you to have, or to supply to the
|
|
registration officials, any "spare parts" when registering such a "firearm,"
|
|
and no such addition to the law can be made by Order in Council. An OIC
|
|
can only be made to explain or elaborate the law, NOT to EXTEND it.
|
|
|
|
8. Once registered, even if they insist on annotating the registration
|
|
certificate "frame or receiver ONLY," it is REGISTERED and no charge of
|
|
improper registration can be brought in regard to that firearm. The
|
|
legislation does NOT require that a "firearm" be complete, but DOES require
|
|
that the "firearm" be registered. The "frame or receiver" IS that firearm"
|
|
-- regardless of what "spare parts" are assembed to it or removed from it.
|
|
|
|
NOTE: It may be impossible to denote on the registration certificate which
|
|
class of firearm it is, but that is only because the definition of
|
|
"firearm" and te definitions of "restricted firearm"
|
|
plus five differing definitions of prohibited firearm" are
|
|
in confused and confusing conflict with each other.
|
|
|
|
The requirement in law is to register a "firearm." There is nothing to
|
|
require that the "firearm" be registered in a particular class, to require the
|
|
owner to modify it so that it falls into ONLY one class, or to purchase parts
|
|
that he does not currently own to satisfy the whims of a registration official
|
|
who wants it to fall into one -- and ONLY one -- class. Under administratve
|
|
law, a registration official who makes such demands has strayed beyond
|
|
his legitimate role. He is no longer exercising opinion judgement. He is
|
|
LEGISLATING -- and that is clearly beyond his vested powers.
|
|
|
|
9. Unfortunately, that type of registration will cause major "unique
|
|
identification" problems. Since a "frame or receiver" HAS no Calibre, Shots
|
|
or Barrel length, those entries will have to be marked "UNKNOWN" on the
|
|
registration certificate.
|
|
|
|
10. Additionally, there is serious danger in trying to supply PRECISELY
|
|
what the registration official WANTS for each entry on the registration
|
|
certificate for the "firearm" you are trying to register. Therefore, to
|
|
avoid risk of prosecution at some later date, the only SAFE way to apply for
|
|
a registration certificate is to apply in this form: "Make: UNKNOWN; Model:
|
|
UNKNOWN; Manufacturer: UNKNOWN; Calibre: UNKNOWN; Shots: UNKNOWN; Barrel
|
|
length: UNKNOWN." If YOU supply that information, and do not know that your
|
|
"J C Higgins" rifle was made by Marlin or that your Mauser rifle was made
|
|
by some company in Poland, that your Mauser 93 is actually a Mauser 95, or
|
|
that your ".30-06" has been rechambered to ".30-06 Ackley Improved" or ".308
|
|
Norma Magnum", or that your "10-shot" .22 rifle magazine will take 15
|
|
cartridges if they are .22 Short instead of .22 Long rifle, YOU can be held
|
|
to have given "false or misleading" information to get a registration
|
|
certificate. If the registration official makes the selections, YOU cannot
|
|
be charged for HIS errors.
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Providing a Serial number on an application is also dangerous. FRAS
|
|
currently has firearms registered with a Model number, a patent number, an
|
|
assembly number, a Serial number that appears only on a "spare part", etc.
|
|
If an applicant makes such an error, he violates FA s. 106(1) and (3), and is
|
|
liable to up to five years imprisonment [FA s. 109]. DO NOT ENTER!
|
|
|
|
11. SUMMARY: There are two problems: (a) If you take in or describe the
|
|
whole firearm for registration, you run the risk of being unable to modify,
|
|
repair or customize it at some later date. (b) If YOU tell them what
|
|
entries to put on the registration certificate, YOU can face criminal
|
|
charges at some later date when a registration official actually SEES the
|
|
firearm during transfer to someone else, and decides that YOU gave "false or
|
|
misleading" information to get your registration certificate.
|
|
|
|
NOTE: ALWAYS keep your Application to Register -- to PROVE that YOU did
|
|
not have anything to do with registration certificate entries that turn out
|
|
to be wrong -- YEARS later. That AtoR is YOUR INSURANCE. KEEP IT!
|
|
|
|
12. The cures for those problems are closely related.
|
|
|
|
(a) Registering ONLY the "frame or receiver" preserves your flexibility
|
|
when modifying, repairing or customizing in later years, and preserves
|
|
that flexibility for the NEXT owner. In the future, a "flexibly-registered"
|
|
firearm will command a better price than a "rigidly-registered" one that
|
|
cannot be altered without excessive paper work.
|
|
|
|
(b) ALWAYS leave it up to the registering officials to determine what
|
|
your firearm IS and what THEY want to call it on the registration
|
|
certificate. Then YOU cannot be charged -- at some later date, by someone
|
|
who is not even HIRED yet -- with making an "assertion of belief" that
|
|
turned out to be "false or misleading" [FA s. 106(1) and (3), 109].
|
|
|
|
13. Unfortunately, this pattern of registration conflicts with the intent
|
|
of the legislation to identify firearms by class (unrestricted firearm,
|
|
restricted firearm, and prohibited firearm [including 5 DIFFERENT and
|
|
mutually- exclusive subclasses of "prohibited firearm']). That is NOT a
|
|
result of OUR activities -- it is a result of the defective definitions of
|
|
"firearm", "weapon", "restricted firearm" and "prohibited firearm" in the Act.
|
|
|
|
14. Forcing the firearms control bureaucracy to provide the identification
|
|
of the firearm is going to be costly, at least $90 per firearm to be identified.
|
|
If all of the 20 million unrestricted rifles and shotguns are to be "identified"
|
|
by the firearms control bureaucracy, that comes to $1.8 BILLION. Is C-68
|
|
cost-effective? Keep asking that question, everyone. Because it is not.
|
|
|
|
Dave Tomlinson, NFA
|
|
|
|
FOCUS: This information is crucial to the future of the firearms community.
|
|
Give it the widest possible circulation, and explain it to everyone. The
|
|
proposed methods of registration are illegal and abusive, so we must
|
|
comply with the law -- NOT the whim of some firearms control bureaucrat.
|
|
To obey the law CORRECTLY, it is necessary to UNDERSTAND the law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
The Most Dangerous Item in C-68
|
|
|
|
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 1997 07:08:50 -0600
|
|
From: "David A. Tomlinson, NFA"
|
|
Subject: The Most Dangerous Item in C-68
|
|
|
|
C-68's version of the Criminal Code, section 117.15:
|
|
|
|
"117.15 (1) Subject to subsection (2), the Governor in Council may make
|
|
regulations prescribing anything that by this Part is to be or may be
|
|
prescribed."
|
|
|
|
Translation: The Minister of Justice, acting alone, with minimal oversight
|
|
by his fellow Cabinet members and without reference to Parliament, can make
|
|
Orders in Council with force of criminal law -- Orders in Council that
|
|
"prescribe" many, many things, and that become valid criminal law as they
|
|
come into force. An Order in Council made under this authority does not
|
|
have to be "placed before each House of Parliament" for examination before
|
|
it comes into force. Huge lawmaking power is taken away from Parliament by
|
|
this section, and given to a single Minister.
|
|
|
|
"117.15(2) In making regulations, the Governor in Council may not prescribe
|
|
any thing to be a prohibited firearm, a restricted firearm, a prohibited
|
|
weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device, or prohibited ammunition
|
|
if, IN THE OPINION OF THE GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL, the thing to be prescribed is
|
|
reasonable for use in Canada for hunting or sporting purposes. [Emphasis
|
|
added -- DAT]"
|
|
|
|
Translation: The key to understanding this paragraph lies in the words, "IN
|
|
THE OPINION OF THE GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL." The House and Senate Committees
|
|
both recommended deleting those words before C-68 was passed, but our
|
|
Liberal government refused to delete them.
|
|
|
|
If they had been deleted, as recommended, then any attempt to outlaw, say,
|
|
all .22 biathlon rifles, muzzle-loading shotguns and/or .30-30 Winchester
|
|
hunting cartridges could be taken before a court, and the court could rule
|
|
that such things are "reasonable for use in Canada for hunting or sporting
|
|
purposes." The Order in Council would then be voided by the court. There
|
|
would have been access to justice, fairness and a thoughtful second look at
|
|
bad law.
|
|
|
|
Because they were NOT taken out, and are still there, no court can even look
|
|
at any such Order in Council -- because A COURT CANNOT SUBSTITUTE ITS OWN
|
|
OPINION FOR THE OPINION SPECIFIED IN THE LEGISLATION. Those words, in that
|
|
place, mean that NO ONE's opinion is of any interest or has any power --
|
|
unless that person is the Minister of Justice (thinly disguised as the
|
|
"Governor in Council"). He is given the power of a dictator, not subject to
|
|
any review or to any second opinion, body or method that can be used to
|
|
override his "opinion."
|
|
|
|
By including those words, the Liberal Party government gave every Minister
|
|
of Justice -- NOT just today's, but every Minister of Justice who will ever
|
|
hold that position -- the power to outlaw every firearm, cartridge,
|
|
propellant, primer, reloading device, firearms accessory, spare part, etc.,
|
|
etc., in Canada. It BLOCKED any appeal to the courts against ANYTHING that
|
|
the Minister may do in the future regarding Orders in Council outlawing
|
|
anything.
|
|
|
|
That is too much power to place in the hands of any one person. It is far
|
|
too much power to place in the hands of EVERY person who will ever hold the
|
|
office of Minister of Justice.
|
|
|
|
David A Tomlinson,
|
|
National President,
|
|
National Firearms Association
|
|
|
|
FOCUS: Is THIS the type of government we want? No? Then get out there and
|
|
persuade as many voters as you can that they should help us throw the
|
|
Liberal Party onto the scrapheap of history -- beside its clone, the
|
|
Conservative Party.
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
From the Radio Free Michigan archives
|
|
|
|
ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot
|
|
|
|
If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to
|
|
bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu.
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
YOUR RIGHT OF SELF-DEFENSE
|
|
|
|
"Citizens may resist UNLAWFUL arrest to the point of taking an arresting
|
|
officer's life if necessary." PLUMMER V. STATE, 136 Ind. 306. This
|
|
premise was upheld by the SUPREME COURT of the United States in the
|
|
case: JOHN BAD ELK V. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: "Where
|
|
the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally
|
|
accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with
|
|
very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the
|
|
right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no
|
|
right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more
|
|
than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no
|
|
offense had been committed."
|
|
|
|
"An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without
|
|
affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction,
|
|
and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the
|
|
arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing
|
|
will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter." HOUSH V. PEOPLE,
|
|
75 111. 491; reaffirmed and quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452;
|
|
State v. Gleason, 32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349;
|
|
State v Rousseau, 241 P. 2d 447; State v. Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621.
|
|
|
|
"When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right
|
|
to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by
|
|
force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense,
|
|
his assailant is killed, he is justiciable." RUNYAN v. STATE, 57 Ind. 80;
|
|
Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1. "These principles apply as well to an officer
|
|
attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the
|
|
bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do
|
|
to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence."
|
|
JONES v. STATE, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75;
|
|
Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The following are some very interesting insights compiled in the 1940's (I
|
|
think), by Dr. Warren Carrol, a refugee from Yugoslavian Communism. These
|
|
observations are based Lenin's advacation of Socialism (please note, Communism
|
|
is EXACTLY the same when you wade through the B.S.).
|
|
|
|
FOURTEEN SIGNPOSTS TO SLAVERY (or Socialism)
|
|
|
|
1) Restrictions on taking money out of the country or retention of a foreign
|
|
bank account by an American citizen.
|
|
2) Abolition of privite ownership of guns.
|
|
3) Detention of individuals without judicial process.
|
|
4) Requirements that private financial transactions be keyed to social security
|
|
numbers or other identification so that government records of these
|
|
transactions can be kept by the Government.
|
|
5) Use of compulsory education laws to forbid attendance at presently existing
|
|
private schools.
|
|
6) Compulsory non-military service.
|
|
7) Compulsory psychological treatment for non-government workers or public
|
|
school children.
|
|
8) An official declaration that anti-Socialist,anti-Communist or anti-United
|
|
National organizations are subversive and subsequent legal action be taken to
|
|
suppress them.
|
|
9) Laws limiting the number of people allowed to meet in a private home.
|
|
10) Any significant change in passport regulations to make passports more
|
|
difficult to obtain or use.
|
|
11) Wage and price controls in a non-wartime situation.
|
|
12) Any kind of compulsory regulation with the government of where individuals
|
|
work.
|
|
13) Any attempt to restrict freedom of movement within the country.
|
|
14) Any attemt to make a new major law by executive decree (that is, actually
|
|
put into effect, not merely authorized as by existing executive orders).
|
|
|
|
This is a fairly old document, very seldom found in published form, written by
|
|
a very published historian (normally).
|
|
|
|
These steps to destroy personal freedom are not in order and don't seem to have
|
|
any particular importance, but this is whats required for a few select
|
|
individuals to make you and your friends their slaves.
|
|
|
|
There is very little you can do as an individual to prevent this from
|
|
happening. The only thing you can do is to capture this document and ensure as
|
|
many people as possible see it. It has nothing to do with "revolution" or
|
|
"overthrowing" the Government. It will remind people of what the "creators" of
|
|
our Constitution already knew (and found out the hard way!).
|
|
|
|
[Did you know...] "Assault Rifles" are not classified as automatic weapons.
|
|
These weapons are clasically used to shoot long distances, many rounds,
|
|
without the barrel warping. As a rule, these weapons are used in MILITARY
|
|
type confrontations only.
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
FWIW
|
|
|
|
The following excerpt is from an interview conducted by Aaron Zelman in
|
|
1990. Mr. Zelman is the founder of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms
|
|
Ownership (JPFO / 2872 S. Wentworth Ave. / Milwaukee / WI / 53207 / 414-
|
|
769-0760). His subject was Theodore Haas, a former prisoner of the
|
|
infamous Dachau concentration camp.
|
|
|
|
A Warning: HOLOCAUST SURVIVOR DENOUNCES ANTI-GUN-OWNERSHIP MOVEMENT
|
|
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
(Excerpt)
|
|
IF ONLY WE WERE ARMED
|
|
+++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
Q. Did the camp inmates ever bring up the topic, "If only we were armed
|
|
before, we would not be here now"?
|
|
|
|
A. Many, many times. Before Adolf Hitler came to power, there was a black
|
|
market in firearms, but the German people had been so conditioned to be
|
|
law abiding, that they would never consider buying an unregistered gun.
|
|
The German people really believed that only hoodlums own such guns.
|
|
What fools we were. It truly frightens me to see how the government,
|
|
media, and some police groups in America are pushing for the same mindset.
|
|
In my opinion, the people of America had better start asking and demanding
|
|
answers to some hard questions about firearms ownership, especially, if
|
|
the government does not trust me to own firearms, why or how can the
|
|
people be expected to trust the government?
|
|
|
|
There is no doubt in my mind that millions of lives could have been
|
|
saved if the people were not "brainwashed" about gun ownership and had
|
|
been well armed. Hitler's thugs and goons were not very brave when
|
|
confronted by a gun. Gun haters always want to forget the Warsaw Ghetto
|
|
uprising, which is a perfect example of how a ragtag, half-starved group
|
|
of Jews took up 10 handguns and made asses out of the Nazis.
|
|
|
|
Q. Did you have any contacts with the White Rose Society (mostly German
|
|
students against Hitler)? Did anyone try to hide you from the Nazis?
|
|
|
|
A. I did not, but my local friend, Richard Scholl, had two cousins or nephews
|
|
who were members. Both were executed in Munich (I believe) for standing
|
|
up for decency and freedom. Not enough people knew about the White Rose
|
|
Society. There were many non-Jews who were not anti-Semetic and were
|
|
very much opposed to Hitler.
|
|
|
|
It was impossible to hide people from the Nazis in Germany - it is so
|
|
densely populated and food was rationed. Another point that many people
|
|
fail to understand is that in Germany, you had a situation where the
|
|
children were reporting to their teachers if their parents listened to
|
|
the BBC on the short wave radio, or what they were talking about at home.
|
|
If a German was friendly to a Jew, he was warned once. If he failed to
|
|
heed the warning, he would disappear and never be heard from again. This
|
|
was known as "Operation Night and Fog."
|
|
|
|
Q. Do you think American society has enough stability that Jews and other
|
|
minorities are safe from severe persecution?
|
|
|
|
A. No. I think there is more anti-Semitism in America (some of it caused
|
|
by leftist Jewish politicians and organizations who promote gun control
|
|
schemes) than there was in Germany. This may stun some people, but not
|
|
all Germans hated Jews. My best and devoted friends in Germany were
|
|
Christians.
|
|
|
|
I perceive America as a very unstable society, due to the social tinkering
|
|
of the Kennedy/Metzenbaum-type politicians. When I first came to this
|
|
wonderful country after World War II, America was a vibrant, dynamic and
|
|
promising society. There really was an American dream, attainable by
|
|
those who wanted to work. Now, due to the curse of Liberalism, America
|
|
is in a period of moral decline. Even worse, corrupt criminals hold
|
|
high political office, and you have police officials who don't give a
|
|
damn about the Bill of Rights. They just want to control people, not
|
|
protect and serve. When you study history, you see that when a country
|
|
becomes an immoral manure heap, as America is rapidly becoming, all
|
|
minorities suffer, and ultimately, all the citizens.
|
|
|
|
Q. What words of warning would you like to give to young people who will
|
|
soon be eligible to vote?
|
|
|
|
A. Vote only for politicians who trust the people to own all types of
|
|
firearms, and who have a strong pro-Second Amendment voting record.
|
|
Anti-gun-ownership politicians are very dangerous to a free society.
|
|
Liberty and freedom can only be preserved by an armed citizenry. I
|
|
see creeping fascism in America, just as in Germany, a drip at a time;
|
|
a law here, a law there, all supposedly passed to protect the public.
|
|
Soon you have total enslavement. Too many Americans have forgotten
|
|
that tyranny often masquerades as doing good. This IS the technique
|
|
the Liberal politicians/Liberal media alliance are using to enslave
|
|
America.
|
|
|
|
Q. What message do you have for ultra-Liberal organizations and individuals
|
|
who want Americans disarmed?
|
|
|
|
A. Their ignorance is pitiful - their lives have been too easy. Had they
|
|
experienced Dachau, they would have a better idea of how precious freedom
|
|
is. These leftists should live in the tradition of America or they should
|
|
leave America. These Sarah Brady types must be educated to understand
|
|
that because we have an armed citizenry, that a dictatorship has not YET
|
|
happened in America. These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to Liberty
|
|
than street criminals or foreign spies.
|
|
|
|
Q. Some concentration camp survivors are opposed to gun ownership.
|
|
What message would you like to share with them?
|
|
|
|
A. I would like to say, "You cowards; you gun haters, you don't deserve to
|
|
live in America. Go live in the Soviet Union, if you love gun control
|
|
so damn much." It was the stupidity of these naive fools that aided
|
|
and abetted Hitler's goons and thugs. Anti-gun-ownership Holocaust
|
|
survivors insult the memories of all those that needlessly perished for
|
|
lack of being able to adequately defend themselves.
|
|
|
|
Q. It appears the Liberal left in America is tolerating, and sometimes
|
|
espousing anti-Semitism. Why do you think so many Jews still support
|
|
the leftist form of Liberalism?
|
|
|
|
A. It is for this very reason that I firmly believe that we harbor more
|
|
stupid and naive people in our midst, than any other group of people.
|
|
It amazes me how Liberal Jews have such short memories that today,
|
|
they would be so supportive and involved in setting up the mechanics
|
|
of gun control, so that a Holocaust can happen again. All they're doing
|
|
is playing into the hands of the very clever communists who are masters
|
|
at conning Americans.
|
|
|
|
Q. Why did you join JPFO?
|
|
|
|
A. I feel every Jew should be armed to the teeth, as should every American.
|
|
I joined JPFO because as a group, we can stand up to Liberal Jewish gun
|
|
haters and also to Gestapo-minded anti-gun police who want total control
|
|
of the people. I wish JPFO was in existence years ago. I believe the
|
|
Jewish involvement in gun cintrol would not be anywhere close to what
|
|
it is today, but better now than never.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOURCE AND SCRIPTS - {SOURCE}
|
|
For all the skript kidz:
|
|
|
|
/**********************************
|
|
* Domain Scanner v2.0 *
|
|
* by HoGs HeaD *
|
|
* Fixed up the screwy stuff. *
|
|
* (C)1998 HoGs HeaD *
|
|
* You may not modify and *
|
|
* then redistribute *
|
|
* this source. *
|
|
*********************************/
|
|
|
|
#include <stdio.h>
|
|
#include <sys/socket.h>
|
|
#include <sys/types.h>
|
|
#include <sys/wait.h>
|
|
#include <netinet/in.h>
|
|
#include <errno.h>
|
|
#include <netdb.h>
|
|
#include <signal.h>
|
|
|
|
void brk(int no){
|
|
printf("^C Interrupt!\n");
|
|
exit(1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void main(int argc, char **argv)
|
|
{
|
|
struct hostent *host; /* init stuff */
|
|
struct sockaddr_in sa;
|
|
int net, error;
|
|
int port=23, i, done=0;
|
|
char *curr_ip, *del, *cm[100];
|
|
int A1, A2, A3, A4;
|
|
int B1, B2, B3, B4;
|
|
int C1, C2, C3, C4;
|
|
printf("\nDomain Scanner v2.0 by HoGs HeaD\nHit any key to end.\n");
|
|
if(argc < 3){
|
|
printf("Usage: domscan ip_begin ip_end port\nwhere ip_start equals the
|
|
beginning IP(ie 127.26.26.1)\nand ip_end equals the ending IP(ie 147.26.27.12)\
|
|
nand port is the port to check on\n\n");
|
|
exit(0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
signal(SIGINT, brk);
|
|
if(argv[3]==NULL){
|
|
}else{
|
|
port=atoi(argv[3]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Parse in the first Ip.... */
|
|
|
|
curr_ip=argv[1];
|
|
del=(char *)strtok(curr_ip, ".");
|
|
A1=atoi(del);
|
|
del=(char *)strtok(NULL, ".");
|
|
A2=atoi(del);
|
|
del=(char *)strtok(NULL, ".");
|
|
A3=atoi(del);
|
|
del=(char *)strtok(NULL, ".");
|
|
A4=atoi(del);
|
|
|
|
/* Read in Second Ip... */
|
|
curr_ip = argv[2];
|
|
del=(char *)strtok(curr_ip, ".");
|
|
B1=atoi(del);
|
|
del=(char *)strtok(NULL, ".");
|
|
B2=atoi(del);
|
|
del=(char *)strtok(NULL, ".");
|
|
B3=atoi(del);
|
|
del=(char *)strtok(NULL, ".");
|
|
B4=atoi(del);
|
|
/* We're finished parsing, now onto the actual scan... */
|
|
C1=A1;
|
|
C2=A2; /* SaVe DeM VaLueS! */
|
|
C3=A3;
|
|
C4=A4;
|
|
for(A4=C4;A4<=B4; A4++){
|
|
for(A3=C3;A3<=B3; A3++){
|
|
for(A2=C2;A2<=C2; A2++){
|
|
for(A1=C1;A1<=B1; A1++){
|
|
sprintf(curr_ip, "%d.%d.%d.%d", A1, A2, A3, A4); /* build the
|
|
ip */
|
|
if( ( fork() ) == 0){ /* fork a chi
|
|
ld */
|
|
sa.sin_family = AF_INET;
|
|
sa.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr(curr_ip);
|
|
sa.sin_port = htons(port); /* socket is
|
|
set and... */
|
|
net = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0); /* create socket */
|
|
if(net < 2){
|
|
exit(2);
|
|
}
|
|
alarm(5); /* wait 5 sec
|
|
onds until we cancel connection */
|
|
error = connect(net, (struct sockaddr *)&sa, sizeof sa); /* attempt co
|
|
nnection */
|
|
|
|
error < 0 ? printf("Error connecting to: %s %s\n", curr_ip, strerror(errno)) : printf("Connection success at: %s\n", curr_ip);
|
|
shutdown(net, 2); /* disconne
|
|
ct socket */
|
|
exit(0); /* exit chi
|
|
ld process */
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
gets((char *)i); /* Wait for enter to be pressed to exit */
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
THC PHREAK'S TOP TEN LIST - {TOP TEN}
|
|
Self-Defense Weapons.
|
|
|
|
1. Guns - Revolvers are too heavy, bulky and difficult to conceal.
|
|
9mm pistols (Glock, Berretta, Smith & Wesson, Browning) are much
|
|
better. Use the largest capacity clip that you can get and have
|
|
extra clips for your weapon. Use soft point or hollow point ammo.
|
|
It has more stopping power to disable the attacker in a hurry and
|
|
the bullet won't travel right through their body, possibly injuring
|
|
innocent people. Carry your weapon with you in your car so that
|
|
you don't get car-jacked. Or, you can holster your sidearm and
|
|
have it at the ready at all times. It's also a good idea to keep
|
|
a handgun in your house, with a trigger lock installed or in a
|
|
safe. The safes that can be opened in the dark (button operated)
|
|
are best, since they give you accessibility in an emergency like
|
|
a break-in. The other option is to have a shotgun for home
|
|
protection. A 12 gauge will suffice, unless you're under attack
|
|
by the military, terrorists, the SWAT team, a gang or a group of
|
|
heavily armed rogue cops. Then you'll require an assault rifle
|
|
and a large supply of ammo. ;)
|
|
|
|
2. Knives - Carrying a small, concealed knife on your person for
|
|
personal protection is always a good idea. Don't go overboard
|
|
and try to walk around with a machete. ;) Also, switch blades
|
|
and butterfly knives aren't the best to use. Get a knife (such
|
|
as a buck knife) with a folding handle. It should be 5-6" in
|
|
length and have a sturdy blade that won't break easily if used.
|
|
Don't buy a cheap knife. Your life could depend on it.
|
|
|
|
3. Stun Guns - They aren't as easy to conceal as knives, but they
|
|
are an effective weapon. They can disable an attacker in seconds,
|
|
without drawing blood. Buy the most powerful one that you can.
|
|
Some of them have 100,000 volts of stunning power. Also, the
|
|
better ones can be used as a hand held stun gun and a tazer that
|
|
fires up to 10 feet away. If you can find the dual purpose gun
|
|
somewhere, they are the best.
|
|
|
|
4. Pepper Spray - A canister can be carried and concealed. It's
|
|
an effective weapon, that when sprayed in someone's eyes or
|
|
mouth will blind them, cause pain and difficulty breathing etc.
|
|
It is also fairly inexpensive and can be purchased in the U.S.
|
|
|
|
5. Mase - It's not as effective as pepper spray, but it has similar
|
|
results when used. It's not just for women that are afraid of
|
|
being assaulted. It is an alternative to guns and knives.
|
|
|
|
6. Brass Knuckles - They can be carried in your pocket, taken anywhere
|
|
and can do quite a bit of damage. Brass knuckles are good for
|
|
situations in which you don't want to pull a knife or draw a gun,
|
|
such as open/public places like bars, etc. While wearing a pair
|
|
of brass knuckles, you can at least stand a chance against a gang
|
|
of people. If you're completely outnumbered, then it isn't a
|
|
good equalizer. But, if you drop one of them with one punch, the
|
|
rest might decide to leave you alone.
|
|
|
|
7. Night Sticks - They are also called Billy Sticks, Clubs, Sticks etc.
|
|
Cops and Prison Guards use night sticks. You can buy them or steal
|
|
one from them. They're available in wood (oak), hard plastic,
|
|
graphite etc. Night Sticks are good to have under the front seat
|
|
of cars and can also be carried under a coat. However, you have
|
|
to practice using them and become skilled with this weapon.
|
|
Otherwise, it can be taken from you and used against you.
|
|
|
|
8. NunChucks - You can make your own by attaching a chain to two
|
|
equal length dowels of hardwood. The ends should fit into your
|
|
hand and be comfortable. The diameter of each end shouldn't be
|
|
too large to grasp. Or, you can just buy a pair. This weapon
|
|
requires a lot of practice to become skilled at using. It's not
|
|
easily concealed either.
|
|
|
|
9. Key Chains - You can purchase key chains that have a small iron
|
|
bar attached. These little devices are weapons that can be
|
|
carried anywhere without anyone ever noticing what it is. To use
|
|
them, you hit the attacker in the throat, eye or on the side of
|
|
their head (preferably the temple) with the tip of it. Since the
|
|
force is concentrated in a small area and it's a hard object, an
|
|
amazing amount of damage can be done by it. However, it relies
|
|
on a perfect swing and punch to be effective.
|
|
|
|
10. Bars - A small steel bar that can be carried in your pocket, fits
|
|
in your hand (while making a fist) can deliver an added kick to
|
|
a punch. You can also use a roll of quarters, that's been taped
|
|
shut with masking tape. If you're able to hit the assailant on
|
|
the jaw with enough force, then they can be knocked out with a
|
|
single punch.
|
|
|
|
Note: I don't advocate the use of weapons in fights. Weapons and force should
|
|
only be used when necessary. Don't use them unless you're in danger of being
|
|
injured and need to defend yourself. If you own a gun, be careful and take
|
|
precautions to make sure that it's not taken and used against you or someone
|
|
else. Remember, guns don't kill... people do. Also, don't bring guns to school
|
|
because that ain't c00l kidz. :)
|
|
|
|
Written by THC Phreak ú Damage, INC. (C)opyright 1998.
|
|
|
|
|
|
THOUGHTS, POEMS AND CREATIVE WRITING - {WRITING}
|
|
"A pathetic zombie race."
|
|
|
|
Blood dripping from the sky.
|
|
Over and over you hear the hideous cries.
|
|
Desperation.
|
|
|
|
Covering the ground are bodies in tatters.
|
|
Their dreams have been shattered.
|
|
Disposable heroes.
|
|
|
|
In battle they fought for social evolution.
|
|
There wasn't a conclusion or resolution.
|
|
No revolution.
|
|
|
|
Brave souls with a cause were attacked and decimated.
|
|
Their very existence was removed, destroyed and eliminated.
|
|
Chaotic evil.
|
|
|
|
Big Brother's mind control and ignorant teachings were victorious.
|
|
Disinformation, propaganda and lies. For that they are notorious.
|
|
Weapons of mass destruction.
|
|
|
|
The men did not seek any followers or pity.
|
|
Big Brother was their foe. An enemy that defines and lives for infamy.
|
|
Dissidents.
|
|
|
|
Glory, honor and truth were what they respected.
|
|
Those very things were what the vast majority utterly rejected.
|
|
Zombies.
|
|
|
|
Indifference and ignorance ruled.
|
|
Again and again the zombies were fooled.
|
|
Blindness.
|
|
|
|
Their will and independence crushed.
|
|
Now Big Brother is all that the zombies trust.
|
|
Overpowered.
|
|
|
|
Individuality and freedom were lost.
|
|
Now they were mere puppets...controlled and brainwashed.
|
|
No resistance.
|
|
|
|
Their rights, choices and chances were now gone.
|
|
Afterall, they chose not to fight and Big Brother had won.
|
|
Defeated.
|
|
|
|
They ignored the warnings. They refused to wage war.
|
|
Indeed, the zombies supported and believed Big Brother. Whenever they were
|
|
stripped, raped and beaten they went back and asked for more.
|
|
Naive.
|
|
|
|
Influenced and constantly being manipulated by Big Brother.
|
|
Truth and lies were now the same. They couldn't tell one from another.
|
|
Puppets.
|
|
|
|
Yes, the gullible zombies were influenced by all of the false promises. They
|
|
believed the shit and did what they were told.
|
|
In the end, they weren't human beings. Their strings could be pulled at will
|
|
by Big Brother and they were frequently imprisoned, bought and sold.
|
|
Enslaved.
|
|
|
|
Life in captivity is what they chose.
|
|
Slavery under Big Brother is something they simply could not oppose.
|
|
Weak.
|
|
|
|
Was this way of life torture to them? Were the zombies upset or enraged?
|
|
No, it was Utopia. They actually believed they were living in a gilded cage.
|
|
Controlled.
|
|
|
|
The land wasn't theirs to own. The decisions weren't theirs to make.
|
|
But Big Brother repeatedly assured them that his way was best. He decided
|
|
everything for them, for their own sake.
|
|
Brainwashed.
|
|
|
|
However, the zombies were all satisfied with the way things were. They
|
|
were peaceful and content.
|
|
Was their happiness real? Or was it artificial... twisted and bent?
|
|
Fake.
|
|
|
|
To them though, it was real. For they acted on emotion and rejected all logic.
|
|
They were disillusioned fools. They just couldn't see that it was wrong,
|
|
demented and sick.
|
|
Deceived.
|
|
|
|
Arm themselves? Pointless. Fight back? Unacceptable and dangerous.
|
|
Relinquish civil rights and liberties? Fair. Victimized and controlled?
|
|
Socially acceptable and part of going with the flow.
|
|
Conformity.
|
|
|
|
Their silence was deafening and deadly.
|
|
It killed any chance of reform, quickly and effectively.
|
|
Self-Sabotage.
|
|
|
|
The zombies loved ignorance and always strived to be perfect, willing victims.
|
|
Never speak out. Never oppose. Never question. Always support the system.
|
|
Mindless.
|
|
|
|
They gave in and had betrayed the very people that were fighting for them.
|
|
The zombies were alone. On their behalf, there was nobody left to fend.
|
|
Helpless.
|
|
|
|
Written by Blackie Lawless ú Damage, INC. (C)opyright 1998.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CLOSING COMMENTS - {CLOSING}
|
|
BLACKENED's Deadly Closing Comments:
|
|
|
|
This marks the end of our 'one year anniversary edition/issue' of the
|
|
Damage, INC. Newsletter. To say the least, it's been a unique experience.
|
|
However, it has also been an enjoyable one. Over the last year, we've
|
|
undergone many changes. By looking back at the first issue, I can definitely
|
|
notice the progress that we've made. Also, the group itself has changed in
|
|
the last twelve months. I believe the changes made have been for the benefit
|
|
of the group and the readers of our releases. I can honestly say that the
|
|
whole experience has humbled me. Although, it hasn't slowed me down, tamed me
|
|
or dulled the sharp edges in my character that I cherish. I still possess
|
|
the same desire to move forward, continue to share information and my thoughts
|
|
with others. That's something that I don't think will ever change. My quest
|
|
to educate and inform is neverending. Even though the goals and direction of
|
|
Damage, INC. are constantly evolving and progressing, I don't think that my
|
|
own state of mind has been drastically altered or affected... Sure, my writing
|
|
has improved somewhat and my 'message' is being sent out across the vast
|
|
expanse of this wired world now. But my reasons for writing articles haven't
|
|
changed, nor have my opinions, beliefs and views. I feel that it's important
|
|
to maintain and reaffirm those things... At the same time, I try to allow room
|
|
for growth and change. A person's mind should never be idle. It's what I
|
|
like to refer to as "Personal Evolution." You can change without compromising
|
|
the beliefs that you hold strongly. It's not easy, but it can be done.
|
|
|
|
As for this issue, it's one of the best that we've released in my opinion. It
|
|
is very theme oriented and contains many thought provoking, interesting and
|
|
informative articles. In fact, it's the type of issue that I wanted to strive
|
|
for since the very beginning. No previous issues of the Damage, INC. Newsletter
|
|
were even close to this issue in relation to establishing and developing a
|
|
particular theme. In this issue, the theme is evident and strong throughout.
|
|
I'm not sure that we can duplicate the level that's been achieved again in
|
|
future issues. However, we'll make an honest attempt. ;) The only real
|
|
disappointment is the lack of letters and articles submitted by readers that
|
|
continues to exist. We'd like our avid readers to participate more in the
|
|
process, ask questions, make comments etc. In other words, don't remain
|
|
silent when you have something to say. Voice your opinions, let us know what
|
|
you think about certain articles and make a contribution if possible. We're
|
|
not asking/looking for compliments. We just want to know what you think.
|
|
Always remember that not standing up or speaking out is a dangerous thing that
|
|
can eventually come back to haunt you. You're already armed with a voice, so
|
|
all you have to do is be willing to use it.
|
|
|
|
Strange Endorsements/Comments/Reviews:
|
|
|
|
"Brilliant." - Anonymous zine reviewer
|
|
|
|
"K3W1 I¤ph0 and 4rticl3z. 2 thumbz 0p!" - Cisco and Egghead Co.
|
|
|
|
"It's strange, shocking and disturbing." - Marilyn Manson
|
|
|
|
"No comment. We were just hax0red." - New York Times
|
|
|
|
"No distortion. Sonically superior." - Stereo Review
|
|
|
|
"I hate it. I hate everything and everyone." - Politically correct hate monger.
|
|
|
|
"It's hilarious. It's spiritual. It's anti-fucking-censorship." - Larry Flint
|
|
|
|
"Yeah. I hate censorship." - Howard Stern
|
|
|
|
"Visually stunning." - Car and Driver
|
|
|
|
"Why are you asking me? I hate those bastards!" - Billy Gates, Micro$oft
|
|
|
|
"That's poetry!" - Mickey, Natural Born Killers
|
|
|
|
"Those controversial trouble makers should separate from Canada." - Cretien
|
|
|
|
"Conspiracies, opinions and intrigue. It's addictive." - Heroin addict
|
|
|
|
"duh... waz dat?!? iz it n3w 'n l33t?" - Local wannabe hax0r
|
|
|
|
"Just Read It." - Phil Knight, Nike
|
|
|
|
Then again, as I said to a 519 user on a board, I don't care if you read
|
|
it or wipe your ass with it. He then asked how he could do that. So, I
|
|
told him that he had two options. Print it out first, or put his ass up
|
|
against his monitor's screen. I have no idea if he chose to wipe his ass
|
|
with it by using the latter method. However, if he did, then his monitor
|
|
must look and smell very strange now. ;) Here it is point blank, if you
|
|
don't like something, then don't read it. At any rate, the above quotes
|
|
should be enough critical acclaim to last for another year.
|
|
|
|
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
|
|
|
|
We're always looking for Writers, Members and Distribution Sites. If you'd like
|
|
to apply to Damage, INC. and join a respected h/p group, then download a copy of
|
|
the Damage, INC. Application Generator and contact us. If you want any of our
|
|
releases, they are currently available (at no ratio) on the following boards:
|
|
|
|
ÕÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ͸
|
|
³ ...AND JUSTICE FOR ALL - (519) NUKE-YOU ³
|
|
³ Damage, INC. WHQ, h/p/a/c/v/t, no ratios, invite only. ³
|
|
ÃÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ´
|
|
³ SatanicDreams - (604) 930-2061 ³
|
|
³ Damage, INC. Dist. Site, Psycho/2 Net WHQ, CCi Net, h/p/a/c/v/t. ³
|
|
ÃÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ´
|
|
³ Infinite Darkness - (954) 797-0666 ³
|
|
³ Damage, INC. Dist. Site, CCi Net WHQ, h/p etc. ³
|
|
ÃÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ´
|
|
³ T's BBS - (306) 384-1600 ³
|
|
³ Damage, INC. Dist. Site, CCi Saskatchewan Host. ³
|
|
ÃÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ´
|
|
³ The Black Rose Tavern - (770) 222-9012 ³
|
|
³ Damage, INC. Dist. Site, CCi Net, h/p etc. ³
|
|
ÃÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ´
|
|
³ +SCBBS 2000 - (916) 421-9213 ³
|
|
³ Damage, INC. Dist. Site, California, CCi Net, h/p etc. ³
|
|
ÃÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ´
|
|
³ Eternal Flame - +381-(21)-612039 ³
|
|
³ Damage, INC. Dist. Site, Yugoslavian HQ, CCi Net, h/p etc. ³
|
|
ÃÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ´
|
|
³ OBLiViO - +381-11-318-DOWN ³
|
|
³ Damage, INC. Dist. Site, CCi Yugoslavia Host, h/p etc. ³
|
|
ÃÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ´
|
|
³ ViCkY BBS - +421-7-596-8331 ³
|
|
³ Damage, INC. Dist. Site, CCi Slovakia Host, h/p etc. ³
|
|
ÔÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍ;
|
|
|
|
Damage, INC. web site:
|
|
|
|
http://members.tripod.com/~damage_inc
|
|
|
|
Comments, Suggestions, Questions, Feedback, Letters to the Editor and article
|
|
submissions should be sent to damage_inc@mailcity.com. Credit is always given
|
|
to the author for any articles or source code that is submitted and published.
|
|
|
|
You can contact BLACKENED directly at blackened@coldmail.com. Shatazar can be
|
|
contacted at shatazar@alloymail.com. You can also contact us in Email on a
|
|
Damage, INC. board near you or via Echomail/Netmail in several quality nets
|
|
including: CCi_Net, Psycho/2_Net etc.
|
|
|
|
- EOF
|