mirror of
https://github.com/opsxcq/mirror-textfiles.com.git
synced 2025-08-21 02:31:43 +02:00
82 lines
5.0 KiB
Plaintext
82 lines
5.0 KiB
Plaintext
/-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-\
|
||
! ESS History !
|
||
! !
|
||
! Courtesy of: !
|
||
! !
|
||
! The Lost City of Atlantis !
|
||
! !
|
||
! <215>-<844>-<8836> !
|
||
! !
|
||
! 35 MB - 2400 BAUD - CLOCK !
|
||
! !
|
||
\-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-/
|
||
|
||
OF ALL THE NEW 1960S WONDERS OF TELEPHONE TECHNOLOGY - SATELITES,ULTRA
|
||
MODERN TRAFFIC SERVICE POSITIONS (TSPS) FOR OPERATORS, THE PICTUREPHONE, AND
|
||
SO ON - THE ONE THAT GAVE BELL LABS THE MOST TROUBLE, AND UNEXPECTEDLY BECAME
|
||
THE GREATEST DEVELOPMENT EFFORT IN BELL SYSTEM'S HISTORY, WAS THE PERFECTION OF
|
||
AN ELECTRONIC SWITCHING SYSTEM, OR ESS.
|
||
|
||
IT MAY BE RECALLED THAT SUCH A SYSTEM WAS THE SPECIFIC END IN VIEW WHEN THE
|
||
PROJECT THAT HAD CULMINATED IN THE INVENTION OF THE TRANSISTOR HAD BEEN
|
||
LAUNCHED BACK IN THE 1930S. AFTER SUCCESSFUL ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THAT PLANNED
|
||
MIRACLE IN 1947-48, FURTHER DELAYS WERE BROUGHT ABOUT BY FINANCIAL STRINGENCY
|
||
AND THE NEED FOR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THE TRANSISTOR ITSELF. IN THE EARLY
|
||
1950S, A LABS TEAM BEGAN SERIOUS WORK ON ELECTRONIC SWITHCING. AS EARLY AS
|
||
1955, WESTERN ELECTRIC BECAME INVOLVED WHEN FIVE ENGINEERS FROM THE HAWTHORNE
|
||
WORKS WERE ASSIGNED TO COLLABORATE WITH THE LABS ON THE PROJECT. THE PRESIDENT
|
||
OF AT&T IN 1956, WROTE CONFIDENTLY, "AT BELL LABS, DEVELOPEMENT OF THE NEW
|
||
ELECTRONIC SWITCHING SYSTEM IS GOING FULL SPEED AHEAD. WE ARE SURE THIS WILL
|
||
LEAD TO MANY IMPROVEMENTS IN SERVICE AND ALSO TO GREATER EFFICIENCY. THE FIRST
|
||
SERVICE TRIAL WILL START IN MORRIS, ILL., IN 1959." SHORTLY THEREAFTER, KAPPEL
|
||
SAID THAT THE COST OF THE WHOLE PROJECT WOULD PROBABLY BE $45 MILLION.
|
||
|
||
BUT IT GRADUALLY BECAME APPARENT THAT THE DEVELOPEMENT OF A COMMERCIALLY
|
||
USABLE ELECTRONIC SWITCHING SYSTEM -IN EFFECT, A COMPUTERIZED TELEPHONE
|
||
EXCHANGE - PRESENTED VASTLY GREATER TECHNICAL PROBLEMS THAN HAD BEEN
|
||
ANTICIPATED, AND THAT, ACCORDINGLY, BELL LABS HAD VASTLY UNDERESTIMATED BOTH
|
||
THE TIME AND THE INVESTMENT NEEDED TO DO THE JOB. THE YEAR 1959 PASSED
|
||
WITHOUT THE PROMISED FIRST TRIAL AT MORRIS, ILLINOIS; IT WAS FINALLY MADE
|
||
IN NOVEMBER 1960, AND QUICKLY SHOWED HOW MUCH MORE WORK REMAINED TO BE DONE.
|
||
AS TIME DRAGGED ON AND COSTS MOUNTED, THERE WAS A CONCERN AT AT&T AND SOMETHING
|
||
APPROACHING PANIC AT BELL LABS. BUT THE PROJECT HAD TO GO FORWARD; BY THIS TIME
|
||
THE INVESTMENT WAS TOO GREAT TO BE SACRIFICED, AND IN ANY CASE, FORWARD
|
||
PROJECTIONS OF INCREASED DEMAND FOR TELEPHONE SERVICE INDICATED THAT WITHIN A
|
||
FEW YEARS A TIME WOULD COME WHEN, WITHOUT THE QUANTUM LEAP IN SPEED AND
|
||
FLEXIBILITY THAT AN ELECTRONIC SWITCHING WOULD PROVIDE, THE NATIONAL NETWORK
|
||
WOULD BE UNABLE TO MEET THE DEMAND. IN NOVEMBER 1963, AN ALL-ELECTRONIC
|
||
SWITCHING SYSTEM WENT INTO USE AT THE BROWN ENGINEERING COMPANY AT COCOA BEACH,
|
||
FLORIDA. BUT THIS WAS A SMALL INSTALLATION, ESSENTIALLY ANOTHER TEST
|
||
INSTALLATION, SERVING ONLY A SINGLE COMPANY. KAPPEL'S TONE ON THE SUBJECT IN
|
||
THE 1964 ANNUAL REPORT WAS, FOR HIM, AN ALMOST APOLOGETIC:
|
||
|
||
"ELECTRONIC SWITCHING EQUIPMENT MUST BE MANUFACTURED IN VOLUME TO UNPRECEDENTED
|
||
STANDARDS OF RELIABILITY.... TO TURN OUT THE EQUIPMENT ECONOMICALLY AND WITH
|
||
GOOD SPEED, MASS PRODUCTION METHODS MUST BE DEVELOPED; BUT, AT THE SAME TIME,
|
||
THERE CAN BE NO LOSS OF PRECISION..."
|
||
|
||
ANOTHER YEAR AND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS LATER, ON MAY 30, 1965, THE FIRST
|
||
COMMERCIAL ELECTRIC CENTERAL OFFICE WAS PUT INTO SERVICE AT SUCCASUNNA,
|
||
NEW JERSEY.
|
||
|
||
EVEN AT SUCCASUNNA, ONLY 200 OF THE TOWN'S 4,300 SUBSCRIBERS INITIALLY HAD
|
||
THE BENEFIT OF ELECTRONIC SWITCHING'S ADDED SPEED AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES,
|
||
SUCH AS PROVISION FOR THREE PARTY CONVERSATIONS AND AUTOMATIC TRANSFER OF
|
||
INCOMING CALLS. BUT AFTER THAT, ESS WAS ON ITS WAY. IN JANUARY 1966, THE SECOND
|
||
COMMERCIAL INSTALLATION, THIS ONE SERVING 2,900 TELEPHONES, WENT INTO SERVICE
|
||
IN CHASE, MARYLAND. BY THE END OF 1967 THERE WERE ADDITIONAL ESS OFFICES IN
|
||
CALIFORNIA, CONNECTICUT,MINNESOTA, GEORGIA, NEW YORK, FLORIDA,AND PENNSYLVANIA;
|
||
BY THE END OF 1970 THERE WERE 120 OFFICES SERVING 1.8 MILLION CUSTOMERS; AND BY
|
||
1974 THERE WERE 475 OFFICES SERVING 5.6 MILLION CUSTOMERS.
|
||
|
||
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL SWITCHING AND ELECTRONIC SWITCHING IS
|
||
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "HARDWARE" AND "SOFTWARE"; IN THE FORMER CASE,
|
||
MAINTENENCE IS DONE ON THE SPOT, WITH SCREWDRIVER AND PLIERS, WHILE IN THE CASE
|
||
OF ELECTRONIC SWITCHING, IT CAN BE DONE REMOTELY, BY COMPUTER, FROM A CENTERAL
|
||
POINT, MAKING IT POSSIBLE TO HAVE ONLY ONE OR TWO TECHNICIANS ON DUTY AT A TIME
|
||
AT EACH SWITCHING CENTER.
|
||
|
||
THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, WHEN THE FINAL FIGURES WERE ADDED UP, WAS FOUND TO
|
||
HAVE REQUIRED A STAGGERING FOUR THOUSAND MAN-YEARS OF WORK AT BELL LABS AND TO
|
||
HAVE COST NOT $45 MILLION BUT $500 MILLION!
|
||
|