mirror of
https://github.com/opsxcq/mirror-textfiles.com.git
synced 2025-08-30 17:00:00 +02:00
377 lines
19 KiB
Plaintext
377 lines
19 KiB
Plaintext
ÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜ ÜÜÜ ÜÜÜÜ
|
|
ÜÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛßÛßßßßßÛÛÜ ÜÜßßßßÜÜÜÜ ÜÛÜ ÜÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÜÜÜÜÜÛßß ßÛÛ
|
|
ßÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÜ ßÛÛ ÜÛÛÛÜÛÛÜÜÜ ßÛÛÛÛÜ ßÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÜÛÛÜÜÜÛÛÝ Ûß
|
|
ßßßÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÜ ÞÝ ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛßßÛÜÞÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛÜ ßßÛÛÛÞß
|
|
Mo.iMP ÜÛÛÜ ßÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÝÛ ÞÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÞÛÛÛÛ ÞÛÛÛÛÛÝ ßÛß
|
|
ÜÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÝ ÞÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÝ ÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛÛ
|
|
ÜÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÝ ÞÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÞÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ ß ÞÛÛÛÛÛÛÜ ÜÛ
|
|
ÜÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÝ ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÝ ÞÞÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛß
|
|
ÜÛßÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÜÜ ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÝ ÛÛÞÛÛÛÛÛÝ ÞÛÛÛÛÛÛßß
|
|
ÜÛßÛÛÛÛÛÛÜÛÛÛÛÜÞÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÞÛ ßÛÛÛÛÛ Ü ÛÝÛÛÛÛÛ Ü
|
|
ÜÛ ÞÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛß ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ ßÛÜ ßÛÛÛÜÜ ÜÜÛÛÛß ÞÛ ÞÛÛÛÝ ÜÜÛÛ
|
|
ÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛß ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÜ ßÛÜ ßßÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛß ÜÜÜß ÛÛÛÛÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÛÛÛÛÛß
|
|
ßÛÜ ÜÛÛÛß ßÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÜ ßßÜÜ ßßÜÛÛßß ßÛÛÜ ßßßÛßÛÛÛÛÛÛÛßß
|
|
ßßßßß ßßÛÛß ßßßßß ßßßßßßßßßßßßß
|
|
ARRoGANT CoURiERS WiTH ESSaYS
|
|
|
|
Grade Level: Type of Work Subject/Topic is on:
|
|
[ ]6-8 [ ]Class Notes [Indians of New France ]
|
|
[ ]9-10 [ ]Cliff Notes [ ]
|
|
[ ]11-12 [x]Essay/Report [ ]
|
|
[x]College [ ]Misc [ ]
|
|
|
|
Dizzed: o4/95 # of Words:2747 School: ? State: ?
|
|
ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ>ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ>ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ>Chop Here>ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ>ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ>ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ>ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
|
|
The Indians were the main focus of the history of New France, and
|
|
influenced the Europeans in the period before 1663. The Indians, being
|
|
numerous compared with the Europeans, came into frequent contact with them.
|
|
The Indians and Europeans traded items with one another, which led to
|
|
various events and actions that contributed greatly to the history of New
|
|
France. The Europeans who arrived after the Indians had already settled
|
|
were exposed to the native people's way of life, from which techniques for
|
|
survival were acquired. Later, the Europeans depended on the Indians, some
|
|
of whom acted as middlemen and who had items which were valuable to them.
|
|
Various Indian personalities were also observed and admired by Europeans
|
|
particularly the Jesuits.
|
|
|
|
The Native Indians were among the first people to enter North America.
|
|
They entered America through the passage of the Bering Strait, a location
|
|
which is the midpoint of Alaska and Siberia. As time passed, they settled
|
|
on various pieces of land and hunted, fished and grew crops. Alfred Bailey
|
|
mentions that, "It had been suggested that Siouans, the Iroquoians and
|
|
Algonquians were among the first to enter America."1 Before the Europeans
|
|
arrived, there were many native tribes that were already settled. By the
|
|
time Europeans arrived in North America, they found natives occupying large
|
|
amounts of land.2 The Indians helped start the history of New France.
|
|
|
|
Since the natives arrived early in North America, their population
|
|
started to increase quite rapidly. With the combination of migration as
|
|
well as the birth rate, the Indians inflated their population to a large
|
|
size. "In 1663, there were only still 3000 Europeans living in New France,
|
|
no more people than constituted a small Iroquoian tribe."3 The Indians
|
|
were in the majority before 1663.
|
|
|
|
Surrounding the area of New France there were two main native groups
|
|
who spoke different languages. These groups were the Algonquian and the
|
|
Iroquoian.
|
|
|
|
The Algonquians were primarily involved in trading and fishing. These
|
|
people remained in groups called bands, which included relatives such as
|
|
parents, children, grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins. Algonquians
|
|
primarily hunted, and so would develop groups to hunt in different areas.
|
|
They travelled around frequently and would take everything they needed
|
|
while on their hunting journey. In the winter, they used snowshoes; in the
|
|
Summer, they used the canoe. The Algonquians were always moving from one
|
|
location to another; because of their hunting they never stayed in one
|
|
location for a long period of time.
|
|
|
|
The Iroquoians were mainly occupied with agriculture. This group
|
|
established themselves near land which could be farmed upon. They remained
|
|
in this area until the land was exhausted and nothing more could be
|
|
cultivated upon it. After the land was worthless it was abandoned and
|
|
another piece of land was selected upon which to plant at another location.
|
|
Their villages were known as Longhouses. These Longhouses were quite large
|
|
and supported more than five families in them. The men were mainly the
|
|
people who constructed the Longhouse. While the men were busy during the
|
|
summer, hunting, trading, or engaging in war, the women would care for the
|
|
crops. The Iroquoians helped contribute to agriculture by being one of the
|
|
first to grow crops.
|
|
|
|
While trading with the Europeans, the Indians were faced with many
|
|
instances that were devastating and other cases which helped them profit.
|
|
Trade in New France was so prominent that France decided to create a
|
|
monopoly to bring the trade under control. Two provisions had to be met:
|
|
|
|
Firstly, the private fur trading company had to
|
|
promote colonization. Secondly, it had to send
|
|
Roman Catholic missionaries to Christianize the
|
|
Indians.4
|
|
|
|
On the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Tadoussac, became the chief trading centre for
|
|
the Europeans. The trade route surrounding Tadoussac contained connections
|
|
from Hudson Bay to New England. Some negative aspects of the fur trade
|
|
were that:
|
|
|
|
The Fur Trade at first enriched traditional
|
|
Indian life, but later increasing competition
|
|
for pelts generated conflicts that led to the
|
|
dispersal of many Indian groups. Indian wars
|
|
grew out of long standing rivalries or
|
|
developed as a result of Indian disputes over
|
|
furs.5
|
|
|
|
An outcome of trading with the Europeans that devastated the Indians,
|
|
was the epidemics which the Europeans presented. These epidemics destroyed
|
|
a large percentage of the Indian population, which they did not deserve and
|
|
which were calamitous to the population.
|
|
|
|
Certain groups, such as the Hurons, abandoned agriculture and focused
|
|
on trading. This reveals that trading had an enormous impact on Indians
|
|
and their heritage. The Indians were still in control of exchanging furs,
|
|
since Indians controlled the supply of beaver pelt sought by the Dutch and
|
|
French traders, who waited at ports on Hudson Bay or St. Lawrence River for
|
|
Indians to bring them in.6
|
|
|
|
Some Trading relationships continued for a long time and other
|
|
affiliations did not last long at all. The trading relationships which
|
|
took place included:
|
|
|
|
French and Hurons traded till 1649, trading
|
|
between Dutch and Iroquois lasted till 1664,
|
|
between the French and Ottawas after 1650, and
|
|
trading between the English and Iroquois after
|
|
1664.7
|
|
|
|
This illustrates that trading relations involving Hurons were practically
|
|
diminished soon after the Europeans had arrived. Regardless of the
|
|
misfortunes that occurred, trading benefitted both the Indians and the
|
|
Europeans.
|
|
|
|
During the fur trade some Indians played the role of the middlemen,
|
|
helping out with the flow of the trade. These middlemen had located
|
|
themselves so they could cover the areas where tremendous amounts of the
|
|
trading done. The Hurons, who were middlemen, mainly traded with the
|
|
Algonquians and the French. The Hurons traded furs and in their canoes
|
|
transported native as well as European goods. The middlemen had some
|
|
influence on the Europeans, for the reason that after the fall of Huronia,
|
|
the Coureurs de Bois took over the role of the middlemen. These Coureurs de
|
|
Bois stayed and lived with the Algonquians who helped them carry out their
|
|
role effectively. Algonquians at some point also played the role of
|
|
middlemen while they were exchanging goods with the Dutch. The middlemen
|
|
were helpful in controlling the trading that developed in New France, and
|
|
the Indians effectively carried out their roles competently.
|
|
|
|
During the fur trade many items were traded between the Indians and
|
|
the Europeans. The main item of trade that the Europeans desired from the
|
|
Indians was fur. Conversely, the main article sought by the Indians from
|
|
the Europeans were metal goods. In 1534, the fur trade industry became the
|
|
most popular and dominant industry in New France. For the Europeans, the
|
|
most popular method to accumulate furs was to trade with the Indians. In
|
|
return for furs, Indians acquired European tools which made their work
|
|
easier and more productive. These tools also lasted longer and could be
|
|
transported easily because of their light weight. The particular items
|
|
traded that were of use to the Indians were as follows: iron axes,
|
|
hatchets, which were useful outdoors and for construction; cooking pots,
|
|
steel knives, and needles helped the Indian women who cooked and sew.
|
|
Another item which had a large impact was the kettle: "The Kettle was the
|
|
most revolutionary article which came within the sphere of the women."8
|
|
Foodstuffs and clothing were also acquired from the Europeans. Among the
|
|
clothing were summer capes which the Europeans wore, and for the winter,
|
|
blankets for beds were traded for furs.9 Other articles which were traded
|
|
but did not have a positive impact on the Indians were liquor and tobacco.
|
|
In 1640 Dutch traders sold guns to Mohawks, and private traders sold guns
|
|
to the Iroquois for furs.10 These items were particularly useful when in
|
|
combat against the enemy, and they were more powerful than any other
|
|
weapons the Indians were accustomed to. Items that were traded, especially
|
|
metal goods, helped the Indians with their way of life and made their tasks
|
|
more easy.
|
|
|
|
Christianization of the Indians was a laborious task, but the effort
|
|
of the Jesuits led to some successful outcomes. Champlain had considered
|
|
that the task of converting Indians was of equal importance as gathering
|
|
wealth in the Fur Trade or extending French influence in North America.11
|
|
The first missionaries who attempted to convert the Indians were the
|
|
Recollets. They tried to make the Indians adapt to the European lifestyles
|
|
with great effort, but were quite unsuccessful. A reason for their
|
|
difficulty in converting the Indians was that there was a language barrier
|
|
which separated the two. To overcome this barrier, the Jesuits who
|
|
followed, had to learn the native tongue. Similarities in religious
|
|
beliefs between both the Indians and the Jesuits were helpful in converting
|
|
the Indians, since these beliefs helped the Indians relate to the
|
|
missionaries' sermons, and the Indians were influenced by the lectures that
|
|
they addressed. The Jesuits, while staying with the Indians during the
|
|
process of conversion to Christianity, were required to adapt to the
|
|
Indians' ways of life and saw many qualities of Indians, some of which the
|
|
priests admired and found virtuous. In conflict with the missionaries,
|
|
some native groups were very fearful of the Jesuits. The reason was that
|
|
people who were baptized, fell ill and soon died. This view led them to
|
|
believe that the Jesuits were associated with all the misfortunes and evil
|
|
which they feared. The Jesuit's endless attempts to Christianize the
|
|
Indians were nevertheless a significant gesture which clearly influenced
|
|
the Indians and their ways of life.
|
|
|
|
Indians possessed qualities which were superior in helping them
|
|
survive and that Europeans found very appealing. The Indians had good
|
|
experience in the resources available which helped in adapting to the
|
|
country. One articulate characteristic was that they "Highly valued
|
|
politeness and good manners in dealing with one another."12 Indians tried
|
|
not to force a person into actions because "It was immoral to make someone
|
|
do something against his will."13 If there was plenty of food, sharing was
|
|
encouraged: "Indians considered it wrong to let someone starve while others
|
|
had more than they needed."14 Therefore the Indians maintained equality
|
|
among all individuals and tried to conform with other fellow human beings.
|
|
On the topic of diseases, A.G. Bailey states, "The early travellers found
|
|
that certain ailments which were current among Europeans at the time were
|
|
absent from the native society. The diseases suffered by the Indians were
|
|
quite few in number."15 This demonstrates that the Indians were healthy and
|
|
adapted well to their environment. The Indians could survive the ruthless
|
|
climate surrounding them, and even developed snowshoes to help them endure
|
|
the terrain when it was covered with snow. R.J. Surtees claims that, "In
|
|
virtually all instances, the Indians greeted newcomers with friendship,
|
|
guidance and assistance."16 That is a good example of their unselfish and
|
|
invitingly friendly attitude to other humans, even if they were of a
|
|
different creed. In agriculture, "These natives, even though they seemed
|
|
so primitive, had mastered agriculture in corn, melon, squash, and beans.
|
|
They had achieved hunting skills with crude weapons and appeared robust
|
|
enough."17 Even though they did not have very good tools, they still made
|
|
the most of whatever they had and used it to their full advantage. The
|
|
natives possessed qualities and traits which are essential for survival in
|
|
demanding conditions and for developing strong relationships.
|
|
|
|
While trading with the Europeans, the Indians became almost possessed
|
|
by the European goods they desired. "With the decline in food resources in
|
|
the country, the Eastern Algonquians lost a measure of self-reliance and
|
|
became increasingly dependent upon Europeans for their supplies."18 Since
|
|
the Europeans had superior metal items, the craving of the Indians would
|
|
force them to go to the Europeans to acquire them: "Indians didn't have
|
|
copper, iron, hemp, wood or manufactured articles and resorted to the
|
|
French for them."19 The European goods helped the Indians out by making
|
|
their tasks easier to cope with so that "They grew dependent on goods and
|
|
allied with whites, who could provide for them."20 This explains how the
|
|
Indians lost some of their heritage by relying too heavily on the European
|
|
goods.
|
|
|
|
The Europeans greatly depended on the Indians as the Indians
|
|
contributed to the Europeans survival in a land which was new to them.
|
|
R.J. Surtees claims that "Iroquois people probably saved Cartier's party
|
|
from complete extinction during the winter of 1535 and 1536, by teaching
|
|
the Frenchmen a cure for scurvy."21 The Indians, being the only other
|
|
human beings and the most welcoming in New France, were the only ones who
|
|
could help the perplexed Frenchmen: "Indians were the only available
|
|
teacher who could show the newcomer how to live in a harsh climate, to
|
|
forage for food, paddle and build a canoe, to travel on snowshoes and to
|
|
build shelters."22 In agriculture, the Indians introduced Europeans to
|
|
plants such as potatoes, corn, peanuts, pumpkins, peppers, tomatoes, and
|
|
beans.23 Because the Indians had furs that the Europeans desires so
|
|
critically, "Both French and Dutch traders tried to conduct themselves in a
|
|
manner that would please the Indians and encourage the Indians to trade"24
|
|
This statement clearly displays that the Indians were the main motive for
|
|
trading, and without them there would not have been any trade taking place
|
|
at all in New France. As the Indians were superior in hunting, the French
|
|
needed assistance from the Indians, who did help them. "The French were
|
|
dependent on native food supply, especially game, in pursuit of which they
|
|
were novices."25 According to some historians,
|
|
|
|
As late as 1643, Quebec was almost entirely
|
|
dependent on Indians hunting for its meat
|
|
supply. Algonquians taught the French how to
|
|
grow corn, beans, pumpkins, and squash. From
|
|
the Indians, they learned how to make maple
|
|
sugar and gather wild berries. Algonquians
|
|
also trained the first Frenchmen how to
|
|
survive the interior.26
|
|
|
|
The native people were independent in agriculture as well as survival, but
|
|
still helped the disoriented Europeans with some of their skills."The
|
|
Indians taught Europeans how to hunt, travel, farm and subsist in their new
|
|
environment."27
|
|
|
|
Prior to 1663, the Indians clearly influenced the Europeans and the
|
|
history of New France. With fur as their main trading item, they obtained
|
|
European goods which they desired that helped make their everyday lives
|
|
easier. Using techniques of survival in the outdoors, they clearly set a
|
|
trend for the Europeans to follow, so that they could reside in this
|
|
unpredictable country. The Europeans, soon after discovering the natives,
|
|
depended on them as their source of various techniques which were mandatory
|
|
for survival, such as hunting for food. The Indians were the primary,
|
|
contributing factor to the history of New France and without their
|
|
influence, Europeans could not have progressed to where they are at this
|
|
point in Canada.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Endnotes
|
|
|
|
1. Alfred G. Bailey, The Conflict of European and
|
|
Eastern Algonkian Cultures (University of Toronto Press,
|
|
1969),p.2.
|
|
|
|
2. Bruce G. Trigger. The Indians and the Heroic Age of
|
|
New France (Canadian Historical Review-Booklet 30, 1978),
|
|
p.4.
|
|
|
|
3. Bruce G. Trigger. Natives and Newcomers (McGill-Queens
|
|
University Press, 1985),p.17.
|
|
|
|
4. R.D. Francis, Richard Jones, Donald B. Smith, Origins:
|
|
Canadian History To Confederation (Holt, Rinehart and
|
|
Winston of Canada, Limited, 1988),p.41.
|
|
|
|
5. R.J. Surtees, The Original People (Holt, Rinehart and
|
|
Winston of Canada, Limited,1971),p.22.
|
|
|
|
6. Ibid., p.19.
|
|
|
|
7. Ibid., p.20.
|
|
|
|
8. Bailey, The Conflict of European and Eastern Algonkian
|
|
Cultures, p.24.
|
|
|
|
9. Ibid., p.12.
|
|
|
|
10. Trigger, The Indians and the Heroic Age Of New
|
|
France, p.18.
|
|
|
|
11. Surtees, The Original People, p.34.
|
|
|
|
12. Trigger, The Indians and the Heroic Age of New
|
|
France, p.6.
|
|
|
|
13. Ibid., p.6.
|
|
|
|
14. Ibid., p.6.
|
|
|
|
15. Bailey, Conflict of European and Eastern Algonkian
|
|
Cultures, p.27.
|
|
|
|
16. Surtees, The Original People, ix.
|
|
|
|
17. Ibid., p.1.
|
|
|
|
18. Bailey, Conflict of European and Eastern Algonkian
|
|
Cultures, p.56.
|
|
19. Ibid., p.11.
|
|
|
|
20. Surtees, The Original People, p.21.
|
|
|
|
21. Ibid., ix.
|
|
|
|
22. Ibid., p.19.
|
|
|
|
23. Ibid., p.19.
|
|
|
|
24. Trigger, Indians and the Heroic Age of New France,
|
|
p.22.
|
|
|
|
25. Bailey, Conflict of Europeans and Eastern Algonkian
|
|
Cultures, p.117.
|
|
|
|
26. Francis, Jones, Smith, Origins : Canadian History To
|
|
Confederation, p.47.
|
|
|
|
27. Surtees, The Original People, p.ix.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bibliography
|
|
|
|
Bailey, A.G. The Conflict of European and Eastern
|
|
Algonkian Cultures. Toronto. 1969.
|
|
|
|
Francis, R.D., Jones Richard, Smith D.B. Origins :
|
|
Canadian History To Confederation. Toronto. 1988.
|
|
|
|
Francis, R.D., Jones Richard, Smith D.B. Readings In
|
|
Canadian History : Pre-Confederation. Toronto. 1990.
|
|
|
|
Morton, D. New France and War. Toronto. 1983.
|
|
|
|
Skeoch, E. Album of New France. Toronto. 1986.
|
|
|
|
Surtees, R.J. The Original People. Toronto. 1971.
|
|
|
|
Trigger, B.G. Natives and Newcomers. Montreal.1985.
|
|
|
|
Trigger, B.G. The Indians and The Heroic Age of New
|
|
France. Ottawa. 1978.
|
|
|