mirror of
https://github.com/nbeaver/why-linux-is-better.git
synced 2025-08-26 15:24:25 +02:00
Typos and formatting.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ because `folders cannot have a read-only status`_.
|
||||
In Linux, by contrast, a read-only directory cannot have files added to it,
|
||||
and files in such a directory cannot be moved, renamed, or deleted
|
||||
without first removing the read-only status from the directory they are in.
|
||||
Modifications of the contents of the files depend on the the individual file permissions.
|
||||
Modifications of the contents of the files depend on the individual file permissions.
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#unix_groups] Unix permissions, for example, are not a panacea: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/164303/single-user-for-sharing-vs-multiple-users
|
||||
.. [#ntfs_permissions_flaw] NTFS permissions have their own issues, e.g. https://serverfault.com/questions/31709/how-to-workaround-the-ntfs-move-copy-design-flaw
|
||||
@@ -804,8 +804,9 @@ Architectural deficiencies of the Windows platform
|
||||
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
||||
|
||||
These are limitations of the Windows platform
|
||||
which are not intrinsic to the operationg system,
|
||||
but nevertheless cause problems.
|
||||
which are not intrinsic to the operating system,
|
||||
but are the result of default behavior
|
||||
or restrictions on the Windows ecosystem.
|
||||
|
||||
-----------------------------------------
|
||||
Limitations on access to external volumes
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user