diff --git a/Grbl_Esp32/data/config.yaml b/Grbl_Esp32/data/config.yaml
index 2be0d925..350c1009 100644
--- a/Grbl_Esp32/data/config.yaml
+++ b/Grbl_Esp32/data/config.yaml
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ axes:
       seek_rate: 200.000
       debounce_ms: 500
       pulloff: 1.000
-      square: true
+      square: false
     
     gang0:
       endstops:
diff --git a/Grbl_Esp32/src/Limits.cpp b/Grbl_Esp32/src/Limits.cpp
index 0b63a0db..56f4e833 100644
--- a/Grbl_Esp32/src/Limits.cpp
+++ b/Grbl_Esp32/src/Limits.cpp
@@ -245,21 +245,12 @@ static void limits_go_home(uint8_t cycle_mask, uint32_t n_locate_cycles) {
         // The following might fail if only one gang has limit switches. Anaylze me.
         uint32_t remainingMotors = (cycle_mask | (cycle_mask << 16)) & Machine::Axes::motorMask;
 
-        uint32_t old = 0;
-
         do {
             if (approach) {
                 // Check limit state. Lock out cycle axes when they change.
                 // XXX do we check only the switch in the direction of motion?
                 uint32_t limitedAxes = Machine::Axes::posLimitMask | Machine::Axes::negLimitMask;
 
-                if (old != remainingMotors) {
-                    //log_info("remainingMotors: " << remainingMotors);
-                    log_info("remainingMotors: 0x" << String(remainingMotors, 16));
-                    log_info("limitedAxes: 0x" << String(limitedAxes, 16));
-                    old = remainingMotors;
-                }
-
                 config->_axes->stop_motors(limitedAxes);
                 bit_false(remainingMotors, limitedAxes);
             }