We decided it is better to have a less intelligent search (that does not
match search terms in titles) for some people than a bad-performing
search for everyone.
We will revisit the search performance topic in the next release cycle,
possibly with larger changes around indexing.
Refs #1738, #1741, #1764.
We accept that this may be desired by forum owners and will offer an
extension to enable this feature. By default, we will not make any
assumptions and simply adopt the web's and browsers' default behavior.
Fixes#859.
- Extract a method for email address generation
- Consistent types
- No docblocks for types where superfluous
- Tweak console output
- Don't inherit from integration test's base class in unit test
- Fix base url when is appended with a script filename
- Add default base url http://flarum.local when CLI wizard used
- Remove some code duplication
- Add minor improvement to the UX when CLI wizard used
- Add tests
- Extract base url normalisation into its own value object
In flarum/core#1854, I changed the implementation of `assertCan()` to be
more aware of the user's log-in status. I came across this when unifying
our API's response status code when actors are not authenticated or not
authorized to do something.
@luceos rightfully had to tweak this again in 8e3eb59, because the
behavior changed for one of the few API endpoints that checked for a
permission that even guests can have.
It turns out having this complex behavior in `assertCan()` is quite
misleading, because the name suggests a simple permission check and
nothing more.
Where we actually want to differ between HTTP 401 and 403, we can do
this using two method calls, and enforce it with our tests.
If this turns out to be problematic or extremely common, we can revisit
this and introduce a method with a different, better name in the future.
This commit restores the method's behavior in the last release, so we
also avoid another breaking change for extensions.
This test would have failed without commit 8e3eb59. Next, I will revert
that commit and most of my PR #1854, so we need this test to ensure the
API continues to behave as desired.
