Since we are already providing the first and only argument
manually, we might as well instantiate the object manually.
Same effect, same coupling, less code.
Refactor Frontend + Asset code
- Use Laravel's Filesystem component for asset IO, meaning theoretically
assets should be storable on S3 etc.
- More reliable checking for asset recompilation when debug mode is on,
so you don't have to constantly delete the compiled assets to force
a recompile. Should also fix issues with locale JS files being
recompiled with the same name and cached.
- Remove JavaScript minification, because it will be done by Webpack
(exception is for the TextFormatter JS).
- Add support for JS sourcemaps.
- Separate frontend view and assets completely. This is an important
distinction because frontend assets are compiled independent of a
request, whereas putting together a view depends on a request.
- Bind frontend view/asset factory instances to the container (in
service providers) rather than subclassing. Asset and content
populators can be added to these factories – these are simply objects
that populate the asset compilers or the view with information.
- Add RouteHandlerFactory functions that make it easy to hook up a
frontend controller with a frontend instance ± some content.
- Remove the need for "nojs"
- Fix cache:clear command
- Recompile assets when settings/enabled extensions change
This finally adopts the new standardized interfaces instead of the
work-in-progress ones with the `Interop\` prefix.
Since we have now updated to PHP 7.1, we can also use Stratigility
3.0 as the middleware dispatcher.
Without this, the new version of Stratigility complained about no
response being returned. Old versions were more graceful here, but
this is certainly more correct.
* Improve fulltext gambit
* Only search in visible posts
This change relies on the `visibility-scoping` branch to be merged.
* Change posts table to use InnoDB engine
Doing a JOIN between an InnoDB table (discussions) and a MyISAM table
(posts) is very very (very) bad for performance. FULLTEXT indexes are
fully supported in InnoDB now, and it is a superior engine in every
other way, so there is no longer any reason to be using MyISAM.
* Use ::class
* Only search for comment posts
* Add fulltext index to discussions.title
* Fix migration not working if there is a table prefix
* Update frontend appearance
* Apply fixes from StyleCI
[ci skip] [skip ci]
* Show search result excerpts on mobile
* Overhaul the way model visibility scoping works
- Previously post visibility scoping required concrete knowledge of the
parent discussion, ie. you needed a Discussion model on which you
would call `postsVisibleTo($actor)`. This meant that to fetch posts
from different discussions (eg. when listing user posts), it was a
convoluted process, ultimately causing #1333.
Now posts behave like any other model in terms of visibility scoping,
and you simply call `whereVisibleTo($actor)` on a Post query. This
scope will automatically apply a WHERE EXISTS clause that scopes the
query to only include posts whose discussions are visible too. Thus,
fetching posts from multiple discussions can now be done in a single
query, simplifying things greatly and fixing #1333.
- As such, the ScopePostVisibility event has been removed. Also, the
rest of the "Scope" events have been consolidated into a single event,
ScopeModelVisibility. This event is called whenever a user must have
a certain $ability in order to see a set of discussions. Typically
this ability is just "view". But in the case of discussions which have
been marked as `is_private`, it is "viewPrivate". And in the case of
discussions which have been hidden, it is "hide". etc.
The relevant API on AbstractPolicy has been refined, now providing
`find`, `findPrivate`, `findEmpty`, and `findWithPermission` methods.
This could probably do with further refinement and we can re-address
it once we get around to implementing more Extenders.
- An additional change is that Discussion::comments() (the relation
used to calculate the cached number of replies) now yields "comments
that are not private", where before it meant "comments that are
visible to Guests". This was flawed because eg. comments in non-public
tags are technically not visible to Guests.
Consequently, the Approval extension must adopt usage of `is_private`,
so that posts which are not approved are not included in the replies
count. Fundamentally, `is_private` now indicates that a discussion/
post should be hidden by default and should only be visible if it
meets certain criteria. This is in comparison to non-is_private
entities, which are visible by default and may be hidden if they don't
meet certain criteria.
Note that these changes have not been extensively tested, but I have
been over the logic multiple times and it seems to check out.
* Add event to determine whether a discussion `is_private`
See https://github.com/flarum/core/pull/1153#issuecomment-292693624
* Don't include hidden posts in the comments count
* Apply fixes from StyleCI (#1350)
* Add Custom Footer HTML
Straight copy from Custom Header HTML
* Move Custom Footer HTML to exactly before `</body>` tag.
* Fix invalid class name
* Append CustomFooterHTML when preparing the view.
* Some consistency in placing the variable
ref #1025#1238. This should prevent the frontend from crashing when
opening the notifications menu, but we still need to make sure
notifications are deleted properly when subjects are deleted.
