mirror of
https://github.com/ezyang/htmlpurifier.git
synced 2025-08-06 22:26:31 +02:00
Merged r434:436 from trunk/ to branches/1.1
- Update documentation. - Update TODO. git-svn-id: http://htmlpurifier.org/svnroot/htmlpurifier/branches/1.1@437 48356398-32a2-884e-a903-53898d9a118a
This commit is contained in:
@@ -6,30 +6,39 @@ through negligence of people. This class will do its job: no more, no less,
|
||||
and it's up to you to provide it the proper information and proper context
|
||||
to be effective. Things to remember:
|
||||
|
||||
1. UTF-8. Currently, the parser runs under the assumption that it is dealing
|
||||
1. Character Encoding: UTF-8.
|
||||
Currently, the parser runs under the assumption that it is dealing
|
||||
with UTF-8. Not ISO-8859-1 or Windows-1252, UTF-8. And definitely not "no
|
||||
character encoding explicitly stated" or UTF-7. If you're not using UTF-8 as
|
||||
your character encoding, you should switch. Now. Make sure any input is
|
||||
properly converted to UTF-8, or the parser will mangle it badly
|
||||
(though it won't be a security risk if you're outputting it as UTF-8 though).
|
||||
your character encoding, make sure you configure HTML Purifier or switch
|
||||
to UTF-8. Now. Also, make sure any input is properly converted to UTF-8, or
|
||||
the parser will mangle it badly (though it won't be a security risk if you're
|
||||
outputting it as UTF-8 though). Character encoding is, in general, a knotty
|
||||
issue, but do yourself a favor and learn about it:
|
||||
<http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/Unicode.html>
|
||||
|
||||
2. XHTML 1.0 Transitional. This is what the parser is outputting. For the most
|
||||
2. Doctype: XHTML 1.0 Transitional
|
||||
This is what the parser is outputting. For the most
|
||||
part, it's compatible with HTML 4.01, but XHTML enforces some very nice things
|
||||
that all web developers should use. Regardless, NO DOCTYPE is a NO. Quirks mode
|
||||
has waaaay too many quirks for a little parser to handle. We did not select
|
||||
strict in order to prevent ourselves from being too draconic on users, but
|
||||
this may be configurable in the future.
|
||||
this may be configurable in the future. Do you want standards compliance?
|
||||
The doctype is a good place to start.
|
||||
|
||||
3. IDs. They need to be unique, but without some knowledge of the
|
||||
3. IDs
|
||||
They need to be unique, but without some knowledge of the
|
||||
rest of the document, it's difficult to know what's unique. %Attr.IDBlacklist
|
||||
needs to be set: we may want to consider disallowing IDs by default to
|
||||
save lazy programmers.
|
||||
|
||||
4. [PROJECTED] Links. We're not going to try for spam protection (although
|
||||
4. [PROJECTED] Links
|
||||
We're not going to try for spam protection (although
|
||||
some hooks for such a module might be nice) but we may offer the ability to
|
||||
only accept relative URLs. Pick the one that's right for you.
|
||||
|
||||
5. CSS. While we can prevent the most flagrant cases from affecting your
|
||||
5. CSS
|
||||
While we can prevent the most flagrant cases from affecting your
|
||||
layout (such as absolutely positioned elements), no amount of code is going
|
||||
to protect your pages from being attacked by garish colors and plain old
|
||||
bad taste. A neat feature would be the ability to define acceptable colors
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user