mirror of
https://github.com/ezyang/htmlpurifier.git
synced 2025-08-13 17:43:58 +02:00
Merge in r657-674, prompted by near release of 1.4.0.
git-svn-id: http://htmlpurifier.org/svnroot/htmlpurifier/branches/strict@675 48356398-32a2-884e-a903-53898d9a118a
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
|
||||
Is HTML Purifier Strict or Transitional?
|
||||
A little bit of helpful guidance
|
||||
|
||||
Despite the fact that HTML Purifier professes only to support transitional
|
||||
HTML, it rejects a lot of attributes and elements that are actually, indeed,
|
||||
Despite the fact that HTML Purifier professes to support both transitional and
|
||||
strict HTML, it rejects a lot of attributes and elements that are actually, indeed,
|
||||
valid. You can investigate progress.html to find out precisely what we
|
||||
are doing to these *deprecated* attributes.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ However, users have found that Strict HTML imposes some quite unreasonable
|
||||
restrictions on certain things. The start and value attributes in ol and
|
||||
li (respectively) perhaps are the most contested. There's is currently no
|
||||
widely supported browser method short of JavaScript that can replace these
|
||||
two deprecated elements. HTML Purifier does not currently support them, but
|
||||
it might behoove us to do so while our output is still transitional.
|
||||
two deprecated elements. It behooves us to allow these deprecated
|
||||
attributes when the output is transitional.
|
||||
|
||||
Fortunantely, that's the only real bugger case. The others have near-perfect
|
||||
CSS equivalents, and were presentational anyway. However, the other question
|
||||
@@ -32,5 +32,6 @@ these loose-only constructs in loose mode:
|
||||
|
||||
The changed child definitions as well as the ul.start li.value are the most
|
||||
compelling reasons why loose should be used. We may want offer disabling <u>,
|
||||
<strike> and <s> by themselves.
|
||||
<strike> and <s> by themselves. We may also want to offer no pre-emptive
|
||||
deprecated conversions. This all must be unified.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user