From 2a024a6806d2a45b5359023f8e0b87846e3d4618 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: 0xflotus <26602940+0xflotus@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 17:50:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fixed repositories (#2238)

---
 Readme.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Readme.md b/Readme.md
index 176c42372..05af19c5a 100644
--- a/Readme.md
+++ b/Readme.md
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ Before creating Slate, I tried a lot of the other rich text libraries out there
 
 * **Collaborative editing wasn't designed for in advance.** Often the editor's internal representation of data made it impossible to use to for a realtime, collaborative editing use case without basically rewriting the editor.
 
-* **The repostories were monolithic, not small and reusable.** The code bases for many of the editors often didn't expose the internal tooling that could have been re-used by developers, leading to having to reinvent the wheel.
+* **The repositories were monolithic, not small and reusable.** The code bases for many of the editors often didn't expose the internal tooling that could have been re-used by developers, leading to having to reinvent the wheel.
 
 * **Building complex, nested documents was impossible.** Many editors were designed around simplistic "flat" documents, making things like tables, embeds and captions difficult to reason about and sometimes impossible.