mirror/vanilla-todo
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/morris/vanilla-todo.git synced 2025-01-17 20:58:22 +01:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

readme tl;dr section, browser inconsistency section

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Morris Brodersen 2020-10-21 14:58:21 +02:00
parent 2a2fb5df5c
commit 8a7a6333e9
1 changed files with 16 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

19
README.md
View File

@ -12,6 +12,16 @@ More importantly, it's also a
_This document presents a "live" case study, expected to evolve a bit over time.
Intermediate understanding of the web platform is required to follow through._
## TL;DR
- The result has comparable or favorable UX, better load and rendering performance,
at a fraction of the code size and bandwidth.
- Vanilla web development is viable at scale but comes with significant
verbosity and requires more effort in browser testing. The former may be
easily solved by simple build steps (SCSS, TypeScript).
- Frameworks and libraries provide lots of value but there's only a few
critical areas where a vanilla approach is clearly inferior.
## Table of Contents
- [1. Motivation](#1-motivation)
@ -522,11 +532,11 @@ and usable:
- Add/edit/delete custom to-do lists
- Drag & drop to-do items across lists
- Reorder custom to-do lists via drag & drop
- Local Storage Persistence
- Local Storage persistence
Additionally, most interactions are smoothly animated at 60 frames per second.
In particular, drag & drop gives proper visual feedback when reordering elements
(an improvement over the original application).
In particular, dragging and dropping gives proper visual feedback
when elements are reordered (an improvement over the original application).
One notable missing feature is Markdown support. It would be insensible
to implement Markdown from scratch; this is a valid candidate for using
@ -599,6 +609,9 @@ and some opinionated statements based on my experience in the industry.
- No type safety. I've always been a proponent of dynamic languages
but since TypeScripts' type system provides the best of both worlds,
I cannot recommend using it enough.
- Most frameworks or libraries handle a lot of browser inconsistencies for free
and continuously test for regressions with extensive test suites.
The cost of browser testing is surely a lot higher when using a vanilla approach.
### 5.3. Generality of Patterns