<p>Ara per ara Moodle només ofereix determinats tipus d'enquestes. En versions futures podreu crear tipus nous.</p>
<p>Les enquestes disponibles s'han triat per ser les més particularment utils en l'avaluació d'entorns virtuals d'ensenyament basats en una pedagogia constructivista. Són útils per identificar determinades tendències que poden donar-se entre els estudiants (Per veure un article sobre el tema amb una anàlisi detallada aneu a <atarget=paperhref="http://dougiamas.com/writing/herdsa2002">http://dougiamas.com/writing/herdsa2002</a>)</p>
<hr>
<p><b>COLLES - Constructivist On-Line Learning Environment Survey (Enquesta sobre un entorn virtual d'aprenentatge constructivista)</b></p>
<ul>
<p>COLLES comprises an economical 24 statements grouped into six scales,
each of which helps us address a key question about the quality of the on-line
learning environment: </p>
<tableborder="0"cellspacing="10"cellpadding="10">
<tr>
<tdvalign="top">Relevance</td>
<td>How relevant is on-line learning to students' professional practices?
<p><b>ATTLS - Attitudes to Thinking and Learning Survey (Enquesta sobre les actituds
de pensament i aprentatge)</b></p>
<ul>
<p>The theory of 'ways of knowing', originally from the field of gender research (Belenky et al., 1986) provides us with a survey tool to examine the quality of discourse within a collaborative environment. </p>
<p>The Attitudes Towards Thinking and Learning Survey (ATTLS) is an instrument developed by Galotti et al. (1999) to measure the extent to which a person is a 'connected knower' (CK) or a 'separate knower' (SK). </p>
<p>People with higher CK scores tend to find learning more enjoyable, and are often more cooperative, congenial and more willing to build on the ideas of others, while those with higher SK scores tend to take a more critical and argumentative stance to learning. </p>
<p>Studies have shown that these two learning styles are independent of each other (Galotti et al., 1999; Galotti et al., 2001). Additionally, they are only a reflection of learning attitudes, not learning capacities or intellectual power. </p>
<p><i>Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. New York: Basic Books, Inc. </i></p>
<p><i>Galotti, K. M., Clinchy, B. M., Ainsworth, K., Lavin, B., & Mansfield, A. F. (1999). A New Way of Assessing Ways of Knowing: The Attitudes Towards Thinking and Learning Survey (ATTLS). Sex Roles, 40(9/10), 745-766.</i></p>
<p><i>Galotti, K. M., Reimer, R. L., & Drebus, D. W. (2001). Ways of knowing as learning styles: Learning MAGIC with a partner. Sex Roles, 44(7/8), 419-436.</i></p>