Addition of index.html; a new help file on regrading student assessments;

minor clean-ups.
This commit is contained in:
rkingdon 2004-08-11 10:18:32 +00:00
parent 675dbdd9f5
commit 02d73b025e
7 changed files with 85 additions and 34 deletions

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
<P ALIGN=CENTER><B>Administration</B></P>
<P ALIGN=CENTER><B>Administration Page</B></P>
<p>This page allows the teacher to see the one or more descriptions for the
Exercise, the student assessments and the student submissions. These items

View File

@ -57,4 +57,12 @@
matter of trial and error with the best starting point being the
&quot;Fair&quot; option.</p>
<p>During the course of the exercise the teacher may feel that the grades given
to the student assessments are either too high or too low. These grades are
shown on the exercise's Administration Page. In this case, the teacher can
change the setting of this option and re-calculate the student assessment
grades (the &quot;Grading Grades&quot;). The re-calculation is done by
clicking the &quot;Re-grade Student Assessments&quot; link found on the
administration page of the exercise. This can be safely performed at any
time in the exercise.</p>

View File

@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
<P ALIGN=CENTER><B>Assignment Elements</B></P>
<P ALIGN=CENTER><B>Assessment Elements</B></P>
<P>For ease of grading, a Workshop Assignment should have a reasonable
<P>For ease of grading, a Exercise Assessment should have a reasonable
number of &quot;Assessment Elements&quot;. Each element should cover
a particular aspect of the assignment. Typically an assignment will have
a particular aspect of the assessment. Typically an assessment will have
something between 5 to 15 elements for comments and grading, the
actual number depending on the size and complexity of the assignment. A peer
assignment with only one element is allowed and has a similar assessment
strategy to the standard Moodle Assignment.
<P>The type of elements dependent of the assignment's grading strategy.
<P>The type of elements dependent on the assignment's grading strategy.
<P><B>Not Graded.</B> The elements are descriptions of aspects of the assignment.
The assessor is asked to comment on each of these aspects. As with all the grading
@ -39,35 +39,33 @@
other.</p>
<LI>The WEIGHT of the assessment element. By default the elements are given the same
importance when calculating the overall grade of the assignment. This can be
changed by giving the more importance elements a weight greater than one, and
the less important elements a weight below one. Changing the weights does NOT
effect the maximum grade, that value is fixed by the Maximum Grade parameter
of the peer assignment. Weights can be assigned negative values, this is an
experimental feature.
importance when calculating the overall grade of the assignment. Weights can
be assigned negative values, this is an experimental feature.
</OL>
<P><B>Error Banded Grading.</B> The elements will normally describe certain items
or aspects which must be present in the assignment. The assessment is made on the
present or absence of these items or aspects. The teacher must all set of grade table which
give the suggested grades when all the items are present, when one is absent, when two are
absent, etc. If certain items are more important than others then those items can be given
a weighting greater than one. Minor items can be given a weighting less than one. The
overall &quot;error count&quot; is a weighted sum of the missing items. The assessor
or aspects which must be present in the assignment. The assessment is made on
the present or absence of these items or aspects. The teacher must all set of
grade table which give the suggested grades when all the items are present,
when one is absent, when two are absent, etc. If certain items are more
important than others then those items can be given a weighting greater than
one. Minor items can be given a weighting less than one. The overall
&quot;error count&quot; is a weighted sum of the missing items. The assessor
can always make a minor adjustment to these suggested grades.
<P><B>Criterion Grading.</B> The elements will give a set of &quot;level&quot; statements
which can be used to rank the assignment. The statements may be cumulative or they may
each be self contained. The assessor must decide which statement best fits each piece of
work. The teacher must also relate each criterion statement with a suggested grade. These
should normally be in order. The assessor can make a minor adjustment to these
suggested grades.</P>
<P><B>Criterion Grading.</B> The elements will give a set of &quot;level&quot;
statements which can be used to rank the assignment. The statements may be
cumulative or they may each be self contained. The assessor must decide which
statement best fits each piece of work. The teacher must also relate each
criterion statement with a suggested grade. These should normally be in order.
The assessor can make a minor adjustment to these suggested grades.</P>
<P><B>Rubric Grading.</B> This is similar to Criterion Grading but there is more than
one criteria. The number of criteria is given in the assignment parameters. Within each
criterion there can be up to five &quot;level&quot; statements. In a given assignment
the number of levels can vary from criterion to criterion. When setting up a criterion a
blank level statement signals the end of the level statements. Thus some criteria may have
two levels, others have three, up to five levels. The criteria can be weighted. The levels
are scored 0, 1, 2, up to 4. The grade for the assessment is a weighted sum of these
scores.
<P><B>Rubric Grading.</B> This is similar to Criterion Grading but there is more
than one criteria. The number of criteria is given in the assignment
parameters. Within each criterion there can be up to five &quot;level&quot;
statements. In a given assignment the number of levels can vary from criterion
to criterion. When setting up a criterion a blank level statement signals the
end of the level statements. Thus some criteria may have two levels, others
have three, up to five levels. The criteria can be weighted. The levels are
scored 0, 1, 2, up to 4. The grade for the assessment is a weighted sum of
these scores.
</P>

View File

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
<P ALIGN=CENTER><B>Grading Strategy</B></P>
<P>A workshop assignment is quite flexible in the type of grading scheme used. This can be:
<P>An Exercise assignment is quite flexible in the type of grading scheme used. This can be:
<OL>
<LI><B>No grading:</B> In this type of assignment the teacher is not

View File

@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
<p>Exercises</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="help.php?module=exercise&file=administration.html">Administration Page</a>
<li><a href="help.php?module=exercise&file=elements.html">Assessment Elements</a>
<li><a href="help.php?module=exercise&file=comparisonofassessments.html">Comparison of Assessments</a>
<li><a href="help.php?module=exercise&file=finalgrades.html">Final Grades</a>
<li><a href="help.php?module=exercise&file=grade.html">Grade for a Submission</a>
<li><a href="help.php?module=exercise&file=gradinggrade.html">Grade for an Assessemnt</a>
<li><a href="help.php?module=exercise&file=grading.html">Grading</a>
<li><a href="help.php?module=exercise&file=gradingstrategy.html">Grading Stategy</a>
<li><a href="help.php?module=exercise&file=leaguetable.html">League Table of Submissions</a>
<li><a href="help.php?module=exercise&file=leaguetablenames.html">League Table Names</a>
<li><a href="help.php?module=exercise&file=managing.html">Managing an Exercise</a>
<li><a href="help.php?module=exercise&file=moreinfo.html">More Information</a>
<li><a href="help.php?module=exercise&file=nelements.html">Number of Elements in the Assessemnt</a>
<li><a href="help.php?module=exercise&file=regrading.html">Re-grading Student Assessments</a>
<li><a href="help.php?module=exercise&file=specimen.html">Specimen Assessment Form</a>
<li><a href="help.php?module=exercise&file=submissionofdescriptions.html">Submission of Exercise Descriptions</a>
<li><a href="help.php?module=exercise&file=takeownership.html">Take Ownership of an Exercise</a>
<li><a href="help.php?module=exercise&file=usemax.html">Use Maximum Grades</a>
</ul>

View File

@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
asks the students to do a piece of practical work. It could be writing an
essay or a report, preparing a presentation, or setting out a spreadsheet,
etc. When the student has done the task they must first self-assess their
work before submitting it to the teacher. Once submitted the teacher can
assess both the student's assessment and the piece of work itself. The
work before submitting it to the teacher. Once submitted the teacher
assesses the student's piece of work using the same assessment form. The
teacher can give feedback to the student and ask the student to improve
the work and re-submit it or not as the case may be. The final grade is
based on how well the student assessed their own work and the work itself.</p>

View File

@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
<p align=center><b>Re-grading Student Assessments</b></p>
<p>This link re-calculates the &quot;Grading grades&quot; of all the student
assessments. Normally it is <b>not</b> necessary to action this
re-calculation. New student assessments are automatically graded after the
teacher has assessed the relavant piece of work from the student.</p>
<p>If, however, the Grading grades are felt to be too high or too low the
teacher may wish to change the &quot;Comparison of Assessments&quot; option
(by Updating the Exercise). The default value of this option is
&quot;Fair&quot;. If the grading grades are too high then setting the
option to either &quot;Strict&quot; or &quot;Very Strict&quot; will reduce
the grades. Or alternatively if the grades are too low, setting the option
to &quot; Lax&quot; or &quot;Very Lax&quot; will increase the grades.</p>
<p>If a change to the Grading grades is required the steps are:
<ol>
<li>Update the Exercise with the new value of the Comparison of Assessments
option;</li>
<li>Go to to the Exercise's Administration page and click on the
&quot;Re-grade Student Assessments&quot; link.</li>
</ol>
The new grades will be displayed. These process can be safely repeated.</p>