This change introduces #### as a separator for general feedback. You need
to add ####General feedback goes here as the last thing inside the {...}.
For example
// question: 123 name: Shortanswer
::Shortanswer::Which is the best animal?{
=Frog#Good!
=%50%Cat#What is it with Moodlers and cats?
=%0%*#Completely wrong
####Here is some general feedback!
}
Note that this change is not entirely backwards compatible. It will break
any existing GIFT file where the character sequence #### us used between the
{} as part of the question. This seems highly unlikely.
Even in the 'Error if grade not listed case', it was applying a small
tolerance. In the case of a fuzzy match, it was returning the inexact
grade from the import file, rather than the precise grade that Moodle
was expecting.
That causes problems when the editing form is displayed, because the
value from the database does not match any of the available options, so
the grade is changed to 0%.
It is probably better to parse the setting every time because somebody may put unsupported values directly into config.php, performance should not be an issue because we do not have editors on every page.
This way we can use the function gradingform_controller::render_preview() to display a preview for students in different modules
without worrying on gradingform-specific options on whether to display description for students or not
In a few situations, this full stop makes things a bit more grammatical,
but there are many other situations where it causes problems. So, on
balance we will remove it.
NUMBER(X,Y) typically come back from the DB as strings. If you don't
convert them to float, then when you display them, it appears as
1.0000000, which is not normally what you want.
Also, increase the size of the field on the edit form, so if you
question does have default mark 0.1234567, you can see that!
The changes between Moodle 1.9 and 2.1 made the marking of very small
answers like 10^-20 almost impossible. This change fixes it.
This fix is almost entirely due the the careful research of Pierre
Pichet, who carefully testing various proposals, and worked out that
this one seemed best.
