moodle/lang/zh_tw/help/forum/ratings.html
moodler b13f7b84ec New Taiwanese (Traditional Chinese) version by Fu-Kwun Hwang (hwang@phy.ntnu.edu.tw)!
Strings mostly done, and about half the help files.
2003-05-14 02:43:27 +00:00

85 lines
4.1 KiB
HTML

<p align="center"><b>&#23565;&#24373;&#36028;&#20839;&#23481;&#35413;&#27604;</b></p>
<p>Individual posts can be rated using a scale based on the theory of <strong>separate
and connected knowing</strong>. </p>
<p>This theory may help you to look at human interactions in a new way.
It describes two different ways that we can evaluate and learn about the
things we see and hear. </p>
<p>Although each of us may use these two methods in different amounts at
different times, it may be useful to imagine two people as examples, one
who is a mostly separate knower (Jim) and the other a mostly connected
knower (Mary).</p>
<ul>
<li>Jim likes to remain as 'objective' as possible without including his
feelings and emotions. When in a discussion with other people who may
have different ideas, he likes to defend his own ideas, using logic
to find holes in his opponent's ideas. He is critical of new ideas unless
they are proven facts from reputable sources such as textbooks, respected
teachers or his own direct experience. Jim is a very <strong>separate
knower</strong>.<br>
<br>
</li>
<li>Mary is more sensitive to other people. She is skilled at empathy
and tends to listen and ask questions until she feels she can connect
and "understand things from their point of view". She learns by trying
to share the experiences that led to the knowledge she finds in other
people. When talking to others, she avoids confrontation and will often
try to help the other person if she can see a way to do so, using logical
suggestions. Mary is a very <strong>connected knower</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Did you notice in these examples that the separate knower is male and
the connected knower is female? Some studies have shown that statistically
this tends to be the case, however individual people can be anywhere in
the spectrum between these two extremes. </p>
<p>For a collaborative and effective group of learners it may be best if
everyone were able to use BOTH ways of knowing.</p>
<p>In a particular situation like an online forum, a single post by a person
may exhibit either of these characteristics, or even both. Someone who
is generally very connected may post a very separate-sounding message,
and vice versa. The purpose of rating each post using this scale is to:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>a) help you think about these issues when reading other posts<br>
b) provide feedback to each author on how they are being seen by others</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The results are not used towards student assessment in any way, they are
just to help improve communication and learning.</p>
<hr>
<p><br>
In case you're interested, here are some references to papers by the authors
who originally developed these ideas:</p>
<ul>
<li>Belenky, M.F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R., &amp; Tarule, J.M.
(1986). Women's ways of knowing: the development of self, voice, and
mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.</li>
<li>Clinchy, B.M. (1989a). The development of thoughtfulness in college
women: Integrating reason and care. American Behavioural Scientist,
32(6), 647-657.</li>
<li>Clinchy, B.M. (1989b). On critical thinking &amp; connected knowing.
Liberal education, 75(5), 14-19.</li>
<li>Clinchy, B.M. (1996). Connected and separate knowing; Toward a marriage
of two minds. In N.R. Goldberger, Tarule, J.M., Clinchy, B.M. &amp;</li>
<li>Belenky, M.F. (Eds.), Knowledge, Difference, and Power; Essays inspired
by &#8220;Women&#8217;s Ways of Knowing&#8221; (pp. 205-247). New York, NY: Basic
Books.</li>
<li>Galotti, K. M., Clinchy, B. M., Ainsworth, K., Lavin, B., &amp; Mansfield,
A. F. (1999). A New Way of Assessing Ways of Knowing: The Attitudes
Towards Thinking and Learning Survey (ATTLS). Sex Roles, 40(9/10), 745-766.</li>
<li>Galotti, K. M., Reimer, R. L., &amp; Drebus, D. W. (2001). Ways of
knowing as learning styles: Learning MAGIC with a partner. Sex Roles,
44(7/8), 419-436. <br>
</li>
</ul>
<br>
</body>
</html>