info/mirror-textfiles.com
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/opsxcq/mirror-textfiles.com.git synced 2025-08-11 04:44:05 +02:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

update

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
OPSXCQ
2018-03-13 09:55:16 -03:00
parent c8b60e1267
commit 63ab644c01
49 changed files with 9544 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

353
textfiles.com/ufo/grudge13.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,353 @@
======================================================================
<<UFONET I>> * 416-237-1204 * PC-Pursuitable * File Requestable * HST
* 24 Hour Operation * Sysop - Tom Mickus * Toronto * FREE
======================================================================
======================================================================
GRUDGE13.TXT - Text file typed in by <<UFONET I>>, original document
^^^^^^^^^^^^ is 8 neatly handwritten pages of which photocopies
have been in circulation in the UFO research community.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Note: What follows is proportedly the recollections of an intelligence
analyst who was given an assignment to prepare an analysis of
the GRUDGE 13 Report. The time frame in which this occurred was
July 1977 with the original GRUDGE report having been published
in 1953. The Grudge 13 report was made up of 624 typed pages on
white paper with a Gray cover. This "Memorandum" as it became
known was first circulated in early 1981. I have tried to remain
faithful to the manuscript in the transcription but as my copy
was an "nth" generation photocopy some guessing was required at
at times. These instances are denoted by (??) . Original spelling
errors have been propagated into the transcribed document and are
denoted by (sp??). The document is reproduced here in Capitalized
letters as was the original hand printed not typed original. The
author used few periods to punctuate sentences and therefore I
have only punctuated when he did
Grudge 13 & the DULCE PAPERS are of great interest to me. If
you have any information to share on these topics I would be
most interested in corresponding with you. I can be reached
via the UFONET BBS network.
Harvey S. Stewart (10/15/89)
======================================================================
======================================================================
IN BOX, DIPLOMATIC POUCH UNDER LOCK & KEY SYSTEM, LOCK HAD
BEEN OPENED, POUCH WAS EASILY ACCESSED TO.(??) STANDARD DIPLOMATIC
COURIERS POUCH MARKED AMERICAN EMBASSY COURIERS, CONTAINED
POUCH SERIAL NUMBER JL327 DELTA. INSIDE A PUBLICATION WITH
RED TAPE WHICH INDICATED CODE RED SECURITY PRECATIONS AND A
AIR FORCE DISPOSITION FORM. DISPOSITION FORM WAS STANDARD WHITE PAGE
COPY, TITLE WAS ANALYSIS REPORT, FURTHER DOWN WAS ONE SUBJECT
ANALYSIS OF ENCLOSED REPORT, SUBJECT TITLE WAS ANALYSIS OF
ENCLOSED REPORT UNDER CODE RED. ONE, ONE READ, ANALYSE ENCLOSED
REPORT UNDER CODE RED MEASURES, GIVE ABSTRACT BREAKDOWN AND
REPORT ON VALIDITY. TWO, OBSERVE ALL CODE RED MEASURES,ANALYSIS
REQUIRED IMMEDIATELY, UNDERNEATH THAT WAS DASH, DASH, DASH,
DASH, DASH, DASH, DASH, NDF, DASH, DASH, DASH, DASH, DASH
BELOW THAT, LOWER LEFT HAND CORNER THE INITIALS WGB. PUBLICATION
WITHDRAWN FROM POUCH, MEASURED APPROX. 8"x11" WITH GRAY COVER.
HEAVILY BOUND, BOUND PAPERBACK STYLE, ACROSS THE CENTER FRONT
IT READ GRUDGE, SLASH BLUEBOOK REPORT NUMBER 13 DATED 1953
DASH PARENTHESIS 1963 PARENTHESIS LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER WAS
AN AFSN 2246 DASH 3 UPPER LEFT HAND CORNER WAS THE WORD ANNOTATED
ACROSS THE FRONT UPPER RIGHT HAND CORNER TO LOWER LEFT HAND
CORNER WAS REDD TAPE INDICATING CODE RED SECURITY MEASURES
ACROSS THE FRONT WAS STAMPED IN RED INK TOP SECRET NEED TO
KNOW ONLY CRYPTO CLEARANCE 14 REQUIRED, INSIDE FRONT COVER
UPPER LEFT HAND CORNER WERE HAND WRITTEN NOTATIONS IN INK
WHICH WERE BLACKED OUT BY BLACK FELT TIP PEN INSIDE COVER SHEET
IT WAS BASICALLY THE SAME INFORMATION AS THE COVER FIRST
PAGE WAS BLANK PAGE THEN INSIDE COVER OF 2nd WAS TITLE
PAGE NEXT PAGE AFTER THAT WAS AN APPENDIX WITH NUMEROUS
NOTATIONS MADE IN IT & BASICALLY NOTATIONS DEALT WITH INSERTS OF
WHAT APPEARED TO BE PHOTOS & ADDITIONAL NOTES. THIS WAS ROMAN
NUMERAL PAGE 2 AT BOTTOM OF 3rd PAGE IT READ G SLASH BV(??)
PAGE 1 OF 624 PAGES TITLE PAGE WAS SUBJECT LETTER NOT
COMPLETE LIST OF APPENDIX REMEMBERED TITLE SOME NOTES ON THE
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF THE WORST(?) NEMO(?) EQUATIONS TABLE OF
CONTENTS PART 1 ON THE DESIGN OF GENERATORS TO ACCOMPLISH STRAIN
FREE MOLAR TRANSLATION PART 2 THE GENERATION OF SPACE TIME
DISCONTINUUMS(sp??) CLOSED OPEN & FOLDED PART 3 ON THE GENERATION OF
TEMPORARY SUEDO(?) ACCELERATION LOCAS(?) PART 1 CHAPTER 1 DESIGN
CRITERIA FOR A SIMPLE GENERATOR & CONTROL SYSTEM REFERRING TO
EQUATION 17 APPENDIX A PART 2 CHAPTER 1 CONTINUATION OF
<end of page 1>
EINSTEIN THEORY OF RELATIVITY TO FINAL CONCLUSION PART 3 CHAPTER 1
POSSIBLE APLLICATIONS OF EINSTEINIAN THEORY OF RELATIVITY AT CONCLUSSION
PART 1 CHAPTER 2 REPORTS OF UFO ENCOUNTERS CLASSIFICATION CLOSE
ENCOUNTERS OF THE 1st KIND SUBTITLE SIGHTINGS & WITNESSES PART 2
CHAPTER 2 CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE 2nd KIND SUBTITLE UFO
SIGHTINGS WITNESSED WITHIN CLOSE PROXIMITY PART 3 CHAPTER 2
CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE 3rD KIND SUBTITLE UFO ENCOUNTERS &
EXTRATERRESTRIAL LIFEFORMS WITNESSED & PERSONAL ENCOUNTERS
SUBTITLE COLONIES RELOCATION THEREOF CASE HISTORIES CHAPTER
3 PART 1 TITLED MILITARY ENCOUNTERS EITH UFOS PART 2 CHAPTER 3
MILITARY REPORTS CONCERNING SIGHTING ON RADAR & ELECTRONIC
SURVEILLANCE OF UFOS SUBSECTION 2 ANALYSIS REPORT J. ALLEN
HYNEK LT COLONEL FRIEND ON PERTINENT DATA SUBSECTION 3
REFER TO APPENDIX B AT THIS POINT APPENDIX MEMORY BECOMES
SLIGHTLY BLURRED BUT CONTINUED ON FOR ABOUT 5 PAGES OPENING
SUBJECT PAGE CONSISTED OF A REPORT OF THE FINDINGS AS WRITTEN
BY LT. COLONEL FRIEND & HIS ANALYSIS MUST STRESS AT THIS POINT
THAT THE VERSION SEEN WAS ANNOTATED THERE WERE INSERTS THAT
WERE ADDED TO THIS COPY AFTER IT HAD BEEN INITIALLY PRINTED
SECTIONS REMEMBERED VERY VIVIDLY ARE THE PHOTOGRAPHS &
THE REPORTS CONCERNING CAPTIVE SIGHTS(SP??) OF VARIOUS UFOS TO
INCLUDE MEXICO, SWEEDEN, UNITED STATES AND CANADA THERE
WERE ALSO WHAT WAS THEN CLASSED CLOSE ENCLOUNTERS OF THE 3rd
KIND IT WAS MADE VERY CLEAR THAT THESE PEOPLE WHOM IT WAS
DETERMINED HAD GENUINE CE3'S WERE MOVED IN THE MIDDLE
OF THE NIGHT BY AIR FORCE PERSONNEL AND RELOCATED TO VARIOUS
SIGHTS(SP??) IN THE MIDWEST & NORTHWEST PARTS OF THE UNITED STATES
IN MANY CASES THESE PEOPLE EXPERIENCED PHYSIAL AILMENTS &
EXPOSURE TO VARIOUS TYPES OF RADIATION ONE CASE ESPECIALLY
NOTED & REMEMBERED VERY VIVIDLY WAS ENTITLED DARLINGTON FARM
CASE OUT OF OHIO. CASE APPARENTLY TOOK PLACE IN OCTOBER 1953
MAN WIFE 13 YEAR OLD SON WERE SITTING DOWN AT DINNER TABLE
AS THEY SAT THERE LIGHTS IN THE FARM HOUSE BEGAN TO DIM DOGS &
ANIMALS RAISED RUCUS ON OUTSIDE 13 YEAR OLD BOY GOT UP FROM
DINNER TABLE TO SEE WHAT WAS GOING ON CALLED HIS FATHER & MOTHER
TO COME LOOK AT THE FUNNY LIGHT IN THE SKY FATHER AND MOTHER GOT
UP & AS THEY GOT UP THE SON WENT OUTSIDE INTO THE YARD AND FATHER
& MOTHER WENT OUT ONTO THE PORCH WHEN THEY GOT OUT ON THE PORCH
ONE OF THE DOGS BROKE LOOSE FROM LEASH BESIDE HOUSE & CAME
RUNNING AROUND FRONT & BOY BEGAN CHASING IT OUT INTO THE OPEN
<end of page 2>
FIELD AS MOTHER & FATHER WATCHED THE LIGHT CAME DOWN FROM
THE SKY & THEY DESCRIBED IT AS A ROUND BALL OF FIRE & IT BEGAN TO
HOVER OVER THE FIELD WHERE BOY & DOG HAD RUN TO AS THEY STOOD &
WATCHED THE MOTHER & FATHER HEARD THE BOY START SCREAMING
FOR HELP WHEREUPON THE FATHER GRABBED HIS SHOTGUN WHICH
WAS RIGHT NEXT TO THE DOOR & BEGAN TO RUN OUT INTO THE FIELD WITH
THE MOTHER FOLLOWING WHEN THE FATHER GOT TO THE FIELD HE SAW
HIS SON BEING CARRIED AWAY BY WHAT APPEARED TO BE LITTLE MEN
INTO THIS HUGE FIERY-LOOKING OBJECT & IT TOOK OFF FATHER FIRED
SEVERAL ROUNDS AT THE OBJECT TO NO AVAIL THEY FOUND DOG IT'S
HEAD WAS CRUSHED BUT NO SIGN OF THE BOY OR ANY OTHER FOOTPRINTS OF
THE LITTLE MEN WHO APPARENTLY CARRIED HIM OFF FATHER IMMEDIATELY
CALLED DARLINGTON POLICE & THEY IMMEDIATELY CAME OUT TO INVESTIGATE
IT THE OFFICIAL REPORT READ THAT THE BOY HAD RUN OFF & WAS LOST
IN THE FOREST WHICH BORDERED THE FARM WITHIN 48 HOURS THE
AIR FORCE MADE THE DETERMINATION THAT THE FAMILY WAS TO BE
RELOCATED & THE MOTHER & FATHER WERE PICKED UP BY THE AIR FORCE
INTELLIGENCE & ALL PERSONAL BELONGINGS & POSSESSIONS WERE LOADED
INTO US AIR FORCE TRUCKS & MOVRD TO A NORTHWESTERN RELOCATION
SIGHT(SP??) THE MOTHER WAS IN SHOCK & HAD TO GO THROUGH GREAT DEAL
OF PSYCHO THERAPY & DEPROGRAMMING AS DID FATHER INTERESTING
ASPECT ABOUT THIS CASE WAS CLASSIFICATION UNDER THE AIR FORCE
REPORT WHICH READ IT WAS A GENUINE CE3 & THAT FOR THE GOOD
OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY THE MOTHER & FATHER HAD BEEN RELOCATED
TO RELOCATION ZONES Z21 DASH 14 NOT SURE WHETHER THIS INDICATES
MAP GRID COORDINATES OR LATITUDE LONGITUDE BUT THERE SEEM
TO BE LOCATION ZONES INDICATED HERE ACCORDING TO REPORT THERE
WERE AT LEAST 4 RELOCATION SIGHTS(SP??) ACROSS THE UNITED STATES
AT THAT TIME DEPENDING ON WHICH TYPE OF ENCOUNTER THESE
PEOPLE HAD REPORT INDICATED THAT THERE WERE EXTENSIVE MEDICAL
FACILITIES AVAILABLE AT THESE RELOCATION SIGHTS(SP??) TO DEAL WITH
ALL MEDICAL EMERGENCIES UP TO & INCLUDING RADIATION POISONING
DEALING WITH IT AS LIMITING IF THEY COULD AT THAT TIME
WHICH APPARENLY WAS VERY EXTENSIVE THERE WAS MENTIONED
IN THE PUBLICATION OF A SIGHT(SP??) LOCATED IN THE UTAH-NEVADA AREA
BUT NO INDICATION OF ITS PURPOSE OR WHAT IT WAS FOR PUBLICATION
GAVE CLEAR INDICATION OF REPORTS OF HUMAN MUTILATION MOST
NOTABLY WAS A CASE WITNESSED BY AIR FORCE PERSONNEL OF AN
AIR FORCE SERGEANT EE6 BY THE NAME OF JONATHAN P. LOVETTE
WHO WAS OBSERVED BEING TAKEN CAPTIVE ABOARD WHAT APPEARED
<end of page 3>
TO BE A UFO AT THE WHITE SANDS MISSLE TEST RANGE IN
NEW MEXICO & TEXAS THIS TOOK PLACE IN MARCH OF 1956
AT ABOUT 3 O'CLOCK IN THE MORNING THE SERGEANTS CAPTIVITY
WAS WITNESSED BY A MAJOR WILLIAM CUNNINGHAM OF THE
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE MISSLE TEST COMMAND, WHITE
SANDS NEW MEXICO HOMEBASE NEW MEXICO APPROX. 3 O'CLOCK
IN THE MORNING THE MAJOR CUNNINGHAM & SERGEANT LOVETTE
WERE OUT IN THE FIELD DOWN RANGE FROM LAUNCH SIGHTS(SP??) LOOKING
FOR DEBRIS FROM A MISSLE TEST WHEN SERGEANT LOVETTE
WENT OVER RIDGE OF A SMALL SAND DUNE & DISSAPPEARED
FOR A TIME MAJOR CUNNINGHAM HEARD SERGEANT LOVETTE
SCREAM IN WHAT WAS DESRIBED AS TERROR OR AGONY THE
MAJOR THINKING THE SERGEANT HAD BEEN BITTEN BY A SNAKE
OR SOMETHING RAN OVER THE CREST OF THE DUNE & SAW
SERGEANT LOVETTE BEING DRAGGED INTO WHAT APPEARED
TO HIM & WAS DESCRIBED AS BEING A SILVERY DISC LIKE
OBJECT WHICH HOVERED IN THE AIR APPROX. 15 TO 20 FEET
OFF THE GROUND MAJOR CUNNINGHAM DESCRIBED WHAT
APPEARED TO BE A LONG SNAKE LIKE OBJECT WHICH WAS WRAPPED
AROUND THE SERGEANT'S LEGS & DRAGGING HIM INTO THE CRAFT
MAJOR CUNNINGHAM ADMITTEDLY FROZE AS SERGEANT WAS
DRAGGED INSIDE THE DISC & OBSERVED THE DIC LIFTING OFF
FROM THE SURFACE & GOING UP INTO THE SKY VERY QUICKLY
MAJOR CUNNINGHAM GOT ON THE JEEP RADIO & REPORTED THIS
TO MISSLE CONTROL & MISSLE CONTROL CONFIRMED A RADAR
SIGHTING(sp??) AT THIS TIME SEARCH PARTIES WENT OUT INTO THE
FIELD LOOKING FOR SERGEANT LOVETTE & MAJOR CUNNINGHAM'S
REPORT WAS TAKEN & HE WAS IMMEDIATELY ADMITTED INTO THE
WHITE SANDS BASE DISPENSARY FOR OBSERVATION THE SEARCH
CONTINUED FOR 3 DAYS & AT THE END OF 3 DAYS A SEARCH PARTY
CAME ACROSS SERGEANT LOVETTE'S BODY APPROX. 10 MILES
DOWNRANGE FROM LOCATION WHERE THEY WERE AT THE
DESCRIPTION READ THAT THE SERGEANT LOVETTE'S BODY WAS NUDE &
MUTILATED & THAT THE TONGUE HAD BEEN REMOVED FROM
LOWER PORTION OF THE JAW AN INCISION BEING MADE JUST
UNDER THE TIP OF THE CHIN & EXTENDING ALL THE WAY BACK
TO THE EOSOPHAGUS & LARYNX HE HAD BEEN EMASCULATED &
HIS EYES HAD BEEN REMOVED & ALSO HIS ANUS HAD BEEN
REMOVED THERE WERE COMMENTS OF THE APPARENT
SURGICAL SKILL OF THE REMOVAL OF THESE ITEMS & THAT THE
<end of page 4>
GENETILIA WAS REMOVED WITH THOROUGHNESS PRECISE
INCISION AS THOUGH A PLUG HAD BEEN REMOVED AS WAS
THE ANUS WHICH EXTENDED ALL THE WAY UP TO THE COLON
BASE ALSO THAT THERE WAS NO SIGH OF BLOOD WITHIN
THE SYSTEM INITIAL AUTOPSY REPORT CONFIRMED THAT THE
SYSTEM HAD BEEN COMPLETELY DRAINED OF BLOOD & THAT
THERE WAS NO VASCULAR COLAPSE DUE TO DEATH BY
BLEEDING SUBCOMMENT WAS ALSO ADDED THAT THIS IS
UNUSUAL & THAT ANYBODY WHO DIES OR HAS COMPLETE LOSS
OF BLOOD THERE WAS VASCULAR COLLAPSE ALSO NOTED WAS THAT
WHEN THE BODY WAS FOUND THAT THERE WERE A NUMBER OF
DEAD PREDATORY-TYPE BIRDS WITHIN THE AREA WHO APPARENTLY
HAD DIED AFTER TRYING TO PARTAKE OF THE SERGEANT'S BODY
THERE WERE A NUMBER OF PHOTOS EXTREMELY GRISLY WHICH
WERE BLACK & WHITE BUT FROM ALL INDICATIONS THE BODY HAD
BEEN EXPOSED TO THE ELEMENTS FOR AT LEAST A DAY OR TWO
NEW MEXICO SUN IN THE DESSERT IS EXTREMELY HOT & DIBILITATING
UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES IN THIS SECTION OF THE REPORT
IT ALSO INDICATED THAT THERE WERE NUMEROUS OCCASIONS IN
WHICH A UFO TRACKED ALONG SIDE A FIRED MISSLE & ON
ONE OCCASION SAID MISSLE WAS OBSERVED BEING TAKEN ABOARD
A UFO WHILE IN FLIGHT THE SPEEDS INDICATED WERE ABSOLUTELY
PHENOMENAL (WILLIAM'S FATHER HAD TOLD HIM PRIVATELY THAT
ON MORE THAN ONE OCCASSION HE PERSONNALLY HAD TRACKED
WHAT THEY TERMED AS FOO FIGHTERS AT THE TIME HIS FATHER
A ELECTRONICS ENGINEER BY PROFESSION & A MEMBER OF THE
ARIZONA STATE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BY CHOICE BUT
AT THIS TIME HE WAS FAIRLY WELL VERSED ON ELECTRONICS
ENGINEERING & DESIGN & ON MORE THAN ONE OCCASION HE WAS
INVOLVED IN TELEMETRY PROGRAMMING OF MISSLES WHAT HE
REFERRED TO AS ON BOARD COMPUTERS LOS ALAMOS AREA WAS
ALSO AN ATOMIC TEST SIGHT(sp??) AREA IN THE LATE 1940'S FOR
SOME REASON THERE SEEMS TO BE A RASH OF UFO SIGHTINGS
AROUND THESE AREAS WHICH MIGHT GIVE INDICATION TO
VALIDITY OF BEINGS LOOKING IN ON US IN REGARDS TO WHAT
WE ARE UP TO, THAT KIND OF THING) THE REPORT ALSO INDICATED
THAT THERE WERE A NUMBER OF RECOVERY TEAMS THAT WERE
ACTIVATED SPECIFICALLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECOVERING ANY
& ALL EVIDENCE OF UFOS UFO SIGHTINGS(sp??) THIS KIND OF THING
MOST NOTABLE RECORDED IN PUBLICATION WAS WHAT THEY
<end of page 5>
CALLED AS RECOVERY TEAM ALPHA IT WAS REPORTED IN
REPORT THAT RECOVERY TEAM ALPHA HAD BEEN EXTREMELY
ACTIVE IN A NUMBER OF AREAS & ON CERTAIN OCCASIONS HAD
TRAVELLED OUTSIDE OF THE CONTENENTAL UNITED STATES IN
MEXICO & CANADA THEY WERE BASED OUT OF WRIGHT -
PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE THEY WERE ON THE MOVE
CONSTANTLY FURTHER INFORMATION IN THE REPORT CON-
SISTED OF SUCH THINGS AS REPORTED SIGHTINGS & THIS
KIND OF THING WHERE AIR FORCE PLANES HAD BEEN DESTROYED
OR HAD COMBAT ENCOUNTERS OR HAD BEEN ATTRACTED BY
UFO'S ALSO THERE WERE AUTOPSY REPORTS OF VAROIUS HUMAN
MUTILATIONS & THIS TYPE OF THING IN THE MEMO TYPED UP
A NUMBER OF THINGS WERE OUT OF SEQUENCE BUT IT DID
DEAL SPECIFICALLY WITH AREAS AS DIVIDED INTO SECTIONS
ABOUT MIDWAY THROUGH THE REPORT THERE CAME A SECTION
WHICH DEALT SPECIFICALLY WITH PHOTOGRAPHS & EACH PHOTO
WAS LABELLED & APPENDIXED TO CERTAIN REPORTS A NUMBER
OF PHOTOS IN THERE DEALT WITH A RECOVERY PROGRAM OF
SOME TYPE THAT TOOK PLACE IN THE SOUTHWESTERN PART
OF THE UNITED STATES THEY DID NOT GIVE A LOCATION NAME
BUT THEY DID GIVE GRID COORDINATES THUS UNLESS THERE ARE
AIR FORCE MAP GRID COORDINATES FOR THAT AREA THERE IS NO CLEAR
INDICATION TO EXACTLY WHERE IT WAS THE PHOTO DEALT WITH
SPECIAL TEAM THAT WAS CALLED IN TO RECOVER A CRASHED
UFO IT ALSO DEALT WITH ALIEN BODIES AND AUTOPSY REPORTS
<end of page 6>
AUTOPSY TYPE PHOTOGRAPHS, HIGH QUALITY, COLOR, 8x10, 5x7
PHOTO # 1 SHOWED A ALIEN BEING ON A AUTOPSY TABLE WHICH
IS A METAL TABLE WITH RUNNELS & TRAPS UNDERNEATH TO
TRAP FLUID & FECES BODY APPEARED TO BE LITTLE SHORT OF
4', TABLE ABOUT 7' NO CLOTHING ON BODY, NO GENITAILIA,
BODY COMPLETELY HETEROUS, HEAD WAS ROUNDED CRANIUM,
SLIGHTLY ENLARGED, EYES ALMOND SHAPED, SLITS WHERE NOSE WOULD
BE & EXTREMELY SMALL MOUTH & RECEEDING CHIN LINE, HOLES WHERE
EARS WOULD BE, PHOTO TAKEN AT ANGLE, SIDE VIEW, LOOKING AT
BODY AT 45 DEGREE ANGLE, LEFT HAND WAS VISIBLE, HEAD WAS GOING FROM
RIGHT TO LEFT BODY WAS RIGHT TO LEFT POSITION, HEAD ON
RIGHT SIDE, CLOSED EYES APPEARED ORIENTAL-LOOKING & ALMOND SHAPED LEFT
HAND SLIGHTLY LONGER THAN NORMAL, WRIST COMING DOWN ABOUT 2-3" ABOVE
KNEES. WRISTS APPEARED TO BE ARTICULATED IN A FASHION THAT IT
ALLOWED LIKE A DOUBLE JOINT WITH 3 DIGIT FINGERS & THUMB, WRIST
WAS VERY SLENDER & A PALM WAS ALMOST NON-EXISTANT, THE
THUMB & 3 FINGERS WERE DIRECT EXTENSION FROM THE WRIST. COLOR OF
SKIN WAS BLUISH-GRAY, DARK BLUISH-GREY AT BASE OF BODY THERE
WAS A DARKER COLOR, INDICATING BODY WAS DEAD FOR SOME TIME
BODY FLUID OR BLOOD HAD SETTLED TO BASE OF BODY, THIS
INDICATES THAT BODY WAS EXAMINED BEFORE BEGINNING AUTOPSY
PICTURE 2 SHOWED BEGINNING STAGES OF AUTOPSY, FOLLOWING
STANDARD PROCEDURE, BODY WAS SLIT FROM CROTCH TO JUST UNDER
CHIN & GREEN VISCOUS LIQUID WAS IN EVIDENCE. THERE WERE
INTERNAL ORGANS BUT COULD NOT BE IDENTIFIED. PHOTOS THEREAFTER
CONCERNED SPECIFIC AREAS OF INTERNAL ORGANS OF WHAT
APPEARED AS SMALL CLUSTER OF A MULTI-VALVED HEART OR AT LEAST
2 HEARTS WITHIN THE CADAVER, NO ACCURATE DESCRIPTION OF
AUTOPSY REPORT OR OF WHAT WAS FOUND WITHIN CORPSE ACCOMPANYING
PHOTOS. INDICATION THAT THERE WAS NO STOMACH OR DIGESTIVE
TRACK PER SE, LATER ANALYSIS SHOWED THAT THE FLUID WITHIN BODY
WAS CHLOROPHYL-BASED LIQUID WHICH APPARENTLY DEALT WITH
PHOTOSYNTHESIS OR SIMILAR, THE REPORT THEORIZED THAT
NOURISHMENT WAS TAKEN IN THROUGH MOUTH, HOWEVER SINCE
THERE IS NO DIGESTIVE TRACT OR ANYTHING OF THIS NATURE,
THE WASTE PRODUCTS WERE EXCRETED THROUGH SKIN. ONE SECTION
OF THE REPORT DID SPECIFY THAT THE CADAVERS WERE EXTREMELY
ODOROUS, BUT THIS COULD BE ACCOUNTED FOR BY EITHER DETERIORATION
OR A NUMBER OF THINGS, BUT THEORY WAS THAT WASTE WAS EXCRETED
THROUGH PORES OF SKIN. THEY COULD ONLY THEORIZE IN REPORT
<end of page 7>
BECAUSE THERE WAS NO XENOBIOLOGY. A REPORT BY DR. J. ALLEN
HYNEK WAS RECALLED VIVIDLY WHICH INDICATED THAT HE HAD ALSO
STUDIED THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THIS PARTICULAR CASE &
THAT HE FELT IT WAS INDEED A GENUINE UFO CAPTURE &
SUBSEQUENTLY THE ALIEN WAS PART OF UFO. DR. HYNEK WAS
NON-COMMITAL BUT DID HOWEVER SIGN THIS REPORT, ALSO
INDICATED IN THE REPORT THAT HE DID NOT VIEW THE BODIES PERSONALLY
BUT VIEWED PHOTOGRAPHS & ACCOMPANYING REPORTS FROM AUTOPSIES.
THE PHOTOS DEALT WITH A NUMBER OF BODIES WHICH WERE VIVI-
SECTIONED IN VARIOUS WAYS. AT ONE POINT A HEAD WAS REMOVED
FROM BODY & PHOTOGRAPHED & AUTOPSY WAS PERFORMED ON THE
HEAD. THE CRANIUM WAS OPENED & BRAIN MATTER WAS
PHOTOGRAPHED & WAS EVIDENT. INTERESTING THING ABOUT PHOTO WAS
THAT THERE WAS A RIDGEBONE OR DIVIDING PARTION-TYPE BONE
RUNNING DIRECTLY THROUGH CENTER OF SKULL AS THOUGH DIVIDING
TWO BRAINS ONE FROM THE OTHER, THIS SEEMED APPARENT FROM
PICTURE. THE SKIN WAS COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM CRANIAL
STRUCTURE & THE SKULL WAS LAYED BARE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE
AT ONE POINT IT WAS DIVIDED DIRECTLY IN HALF & PHOTO SHOWED UNDER-
DEVELOPED EOSOPHAGUS & NASAL CAVITIES NO CLEAR PHOTO OF
EYE ORBS AS WE KNOW THEM, JUST PHOTOS OF COMPLETE
VIVISECTION OF SKULL ITSELF, NUMEROUS PHOTOS OF FLESH OF THE
BEING STARTING WITH CUTANEOUS & SUBCUTANEOUS MICROPHOTO-
GRAPHIC PLATES. APPEARED TO BE CELLULAR STUDIES DONE
UNDER MICROSCOPE & ELECTRON MICROSCOPE TYPE PHOTOS, EXTREME
MAGNIFICATION OF TISSUE SAMPLES
=======================================================================
====================== * END OF TRANSCRIPT * ==========================


105
textfiles.com/ufo/guidancedoc.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
NOTE...SYSOP....IF YOU HAVE THE MEANS TO TRACE THE ORIGIN OF
THIS DOCUMENT YOU MUST NOT DO IT. YOU MUST DESTROY ANY TRACE
OF THE IDENTITY AND OR ORIGIN OF THIS DOCUMENT. THE LEVEL OF
TRUST YOU HAVE BEEN GIVEN MUST NOT BE BETRAYED. IF YOU
BETRAY THIS TRUST YOU JEAPORDIZE THE LIVES AND OR FUTURE OF
INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED AND IN ANY CASE NO FURTHER HELP WILL BE
FORTHCOMING. WE HAVE NOT GIVEN THIS TRUST LIGHTLY. DO NOT
TAKE IT LIGHTLY. YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF SOURCE WOULD PLACE YOU IN
GREAT DANGER. DESTRO
OTE ONCE READ....GOOD LUCK
Though unreceived and scoffed at through the years;
Though made the butt of ridicule and jest;
Though held aloft for mockery and jeers,
Denied by those of transient power possessed,
Insulted by the insolence of lies,
Truth never dies.
A few of us who know the truth are engaged in a dangerous and
frustrating attempt to lead the rest of you to it. Because
of our present or past involvement we cannot (at this time)
let our identities be known. You must understand t
ot some frivilous game we play. We go against the most
powerful and secret organization that you can imagine. Our
very lives are at stake and you must not take that lightly.
You must not ignore the information that we have leaked to
you. Follow the trail. If you persist, proof in the form of
documents will surface. It will take time, money, and
tenacity but it will happen.
We know, for instance, that the vast amount of paper created,
no matter how closely controlled or how highly classified, i
tely unmanageable. Copies have been made and files are
misplaced. The greatest ally you have is that over the years
a great many people have become involved and people make
mistakes. Humans also have a little voice inside them that
forces them to guestion the validity and consequences of
their deeds. We know that this secret weighs heavily on the
minds of many people. At this point fear is the only
controlling factor. If you dig out enough documentary proof
the fear will be lessened to the degr
some of us may
then come forward. We sincerely hope that you understand.
The documents produced by Mr. Moore et al are photographic
copies of genuine documents which were procured at great
risk. The other documents involved are also genuine and you
must follow the trail. YOU MUST FOLLOW THE TRAIL!
The documents you are looking for are for the most part
labeled........TOP SECRET MAJIC - RESTRICTED DATA............
These are the only documents that can lay it bare. Other
documents exist which
er classifications but will
only hint at and in some instances verify the existance of
what you seek.
The following is verification of our credentials...........
VERIFICATION........During the 70's a newspaper article
appeared in the pages of many of the nations leading
newspapers. It also appeared in the forgein press. You will
find this article if you dig deep enough. It was a
monumental breach of security. It was a press release from
the CHAIRMAN OF THE NORWEGIAN JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF, A
NG GENERAL. It stated that a flying saucer had intruded
into the Norwegian air space and had been forced down by the
Norwegian Air Force. The flying saucer crashed on a small
island off the coast of Norway and a special team with
experience in these matters had been dispatched from the
United States to help recover the wrecked craft...........
The following day the same General released another story
stating that the whole thing was a mistake. The story was
supressed and no other articles or follo
eared.
It was an alien craft which was recovered and brought to the
United States by a Moondust team under heavy cover. Now we
hope that you will all act as a team and follow the trail.
Stop fighting each other and ignore those whose job it is to
lead you astray and turn you against one another. Any
intelligent person should know that the powers do not spend
time and money on disinformation if there is nothing to
disinform about. That fact alone should keep you going. Do
not fail us. We have
the truth and we have given
you credentials easily traced. We will guide you when and
where we can but that is all we can do for the time being.
The Ball no question makes of Ayes and Noes,
But Here or There as strikes the Player goes;
And He that toss'd you down into the Field,
He knows about it all -- He knows -- He knows!

- He knows!


173
textfiles.com/ufo/gulfbrz3.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
GULF BREEZE, FLORIDA ACTIVITY SUMMARY
(As of May 1, 1988)
A. Biased one-sided investigation
1. The principal investigators have made public statements auth-
enticating the photographs prior to the conclusion of the investi-
gation. (Attachment #1, "For the Record" dated April 25, 1988)
2. Negative aspects of the reported events in and around Gulf
Breeze, Florida have been restricted and covered-up by principal in-
vestigators. In fact, the investigators have actually taken sides
with the photographer of the objects to the point of furnishing that
photographer with internal correspondence pertaining to the investig-
ation and research of the reported events. (Attachment #2, corres-
pondence referenced or distributed on a limited basis.)
B. Questionable factors concerning principal witness/es
1. The principal witness made his initial report to the _Sentinel_
newspaper; not to an official agency such as the police department,
for whatever reason he may give. This is a factor always considered
when reviewing a UFO report. In the Hickson/Parker case, for exam-
ple, the two witnesses went first to Keesler AFB, Mississippi and
then to the local police department. (Report content)
2. No known person independent of the principal witness has report-
edly observed the same object/s, despite the number of photographs
taken, in presence of the photographer.
3. The witness has been writing and submitting manuscripts to Mr.
Budd Hopkins' agent, Ms. Phyllis Wender, for possible publication of
a book. (Correspondence from Mr. Donald Ware, Mr. Budd Hopkins and
verbal confirmation by the photographer)
4. Some residents in the Gulf Breeze, Florida area have related a
number of disturbing incidents in regard to the principal witness
that causes concern to several investigators and researchers in the
UFO phenomenon community. One example is a statement alleged to have
been made during the summer of 1987 by the witness: "The Ultimate
Prank". (Interview with sources by four witnesses.)
5. The witness has not impressed me, as well as other investigators
and researchers, of having had a truly traumatic experience. (De-
rived from several personal visits with the witness,a review of a
fairly lengthy video tape and investigation report content)
C. Conflicting and inconsistent characteristics to actual known pat-
terns of the UFO phenomenon
1. The area in which the majority of related experiences are said
to have taken place is a heavily populated residential and business
location. The great majority of high quality UFO encounters occur in
rural areas away from such populated areas.
2. The number of reports made by local residences were prompted pri-
marily by the news media (assisted by the principal investigators).
Flaps or waves (large distribution of sighting reports over a geo-
graphical area) created by the phenomenon itself cover a larger area
than what has occurred in the Gulf Breeze/Pensacola reports. This is
additional evidence that the reports were primarily generated by the
news media although some of the independent sighting reports may
very well be legitimate reports.
3. Although one experience related by the witness involved an "at-
tack" by the UFO as it moved over and in front of his vehicle (in an
isolated location for that particular incident) there were no E/M
effects reported. Also, the progression of events are dissimilar to
other low level encounters in higher quality cases.
4. Repeated sightings and experiences related by the witness are
similar to other questionable reports and "contactee" claims. In
most high quality reports the witness experiences a single short
duration encounter. In longer term encounters the witness/es often
relate a time and/or memory lapse following the experience.
5. Repeated abilities by the witness of being able to resist the
anomaly (UFO/occupants) have been claimed. This is contrary to the
results of studies in the field.
6. Several similarities with Mr. Whitley Strieber's book _Commun-
ion_ have been found. The most curious similarity is the related
smell of "Cinnamon" with the Gulf Breeze report which can be found
on Page 19 of Mr. Strieber's book. This is the only known reference
to that smell in UFO literature to date. It is also of interest to
note that the book _Communion_ was released during the winter/spring
of 1987 and that on page 11 of Mr. Strieber's book he states: "I
have never seen an Unidentified Flying Object."
7. The abundance of photographs taken by the witness is a negative
aspect in itself contrary to the actual exhibits of the UFO phenom-
enon. Most high controversy reports involve a large number of pic-
tures -- especially when the photographer claims to be a contactee.
8. The majority of high-quality photographs depicting disc or vert-
ically positioned cylindrical-shaped objects do not exhibit propul-
sion units as shown in the Gulf Breeze, Florida photographs.
9. The objects depicted in the Gulf Breeze photographs are always
tilted in a manner showing a portion of the base but never the top
towards the camera. This is also a curious feature because of the
number of photographs taken.
D. Questionable factors concerning the photographs
1. The first 5 photographs taken on November 11, 1987 depict a
rapidly darkening of the sky that is not consistent with the 3-4
minute duration that the witness related.
2. Accurate cloud movement data for the altitude depicted has not
been completed although there are questions concerning the speed of
the clouds in the first 5 pictures. Mr. Ray Stanford (PSI) informed
me this date that he has reinstated has analysis of weather data and
that information supported by documents from weather bureau stations
will be provided in the near future.
E. Inherent flaws with the depicted object/s
1. The circular base at the bottom of the object is tilted in a
manner that creates a non-symmetrical ellipse. An ellipse must al-
ways be symmetrical. There are, however, certain factors caused by
the atmosphere and photographic lens that may reduce imaging the
true symmetry of an ellipse.
2. There is an ambient light on the entire surface of the object
depicted in the first 5 photographs (especially in photograph no. 5)
that can not be easily attributed to sky light (reflected from
clouds at a distance), the object itself, the moon, the sun, or
local utility lighting. This indicates the possibility of artificial
illumination by the photographer.
3. There is a distinct flaw at the base of the object on the out-
side edge of the rim. This is evident in photograph numbers 11, 14,
and 17.
4. In photograph number 16 inside the bottom base of the object a
circular light is visible. There is a dimmed area visible at one
portion of that circular light which is similar to a kitchen fluor-
escent light where an electrical connection may be. Mr. Ray Stanford
(PSI) is conducting comparative research with such lighting fix-
tures.
5. There is possible evidence of an overlap between the object and
a tree in photograph number 7. The object appears to be in front of
the tree or integrated with the tree itself. Dr. Willy Smith is con-
ducting analysis of this photograph as well as others.
6. The object depicted in the first 5 photographs appears to be non-
symmetrical; that is, the upper and lower portions of the object are
off-center from one another. This may be caused by reflections off
of a glass surface or another form of medium between the object and
the lens of the camera.
7. According to Dr. Willy Smith (UNICAT Project) there is at least
one "window" that does not line up horizontally with adjacent "win-
dows" on the object.
8. The spacing between the "windows" on the object are not propor-
tional to one another horizontally. This is obvious to the unaided
eye and measurements reveal mathematical inconsistencies contrary to
good geometry.
Robert D. Boyd
CUFOS Investigator Coordinator
MUFON State Director, Alabama
/s/
May 1, 1988


98
textfiles.com/ufo/gulflet.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
The following letter from UFO investigator Bob Oechsler appeared
in the May 12, 1988 issue of the Gulf Breeze Sentinel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"An Open Letter to the Citizens of Gulf Breeze"
Dear Gulf Breeze Citizenry:
For those who don't know me or my contributions to the
investigation of UFO related activity in Gulf Breeze, I am a UFO
Investigator/Reporter from the Annapolis, Maryland area. My
involvement in your local sightings case has been quite extensive
with well over 100 hours of research and telephone interviews
with investigators, witnesses, photographers, meteorologists, path-
ologists, technologists and the media. I've been reporting the events
on radio in Baltimore and have included "live" interviews with Ed,
Duane Cook and others. I have battled the skeptics and have
reported my findings to the UFO Intelligence Community. During
this period of time, I have had to investigate numerous sightings of
UFO activity in the Annapolis Bay Bridge area which has served to
limit my otherwise total involvement in the Gulf Breeze Sightings.
Please be assured that not all "distant experts" are scientifically
critical of the extraordinary events that have been occuring in your
peninsula city. Before getting too far into this letter, allow me to set
the record straight on one issue of significance to no one by myself.
Mr. R--- S------- is not a resident of Annapolis, Maryland. You
remember RS, the author of a report with a Strange Breeze blowing
through his head whose Psychic Premonitions lead him to believe
that The Sightings were all an elaborate hoax. Mr. RS resides and
receives his mail in College Park, Maryland, some 35 miles from the
quaint little peninsula capitol of the state of Maryland which so
happens to be the city where I call home. And so now you see the
reason for my interest in setting the record straight.
It should be noted that statistically speaking, there are now on
record over 50 sightings of UFO activity in the Gulf Breeze area that
have no connection to the noted photographer Ed. There are now
on record five photographers of UFO's only one of which has not
been in direct contact with MUFON investigators. There is now re-
ported to be a second video tape of a moving and hovering UFO;
the photographer is in no way related to Ed. And, there are over
100 witnesses of sightings who have asked to file reports, with
some accounts involving five and six witnesses.
Remember the "Jan Tide" with the funny looking blimp of
radar equipment floating about in Pensacola Bay that was suppose
to leave in late January or early February? Well you may have
noticed that it is still there over 90 days later. And, in case no one
has noticed, there is now a similar companion vessel out there
with the insignia NASA on the side. Let's also not forget about that
cute little Army vehicle with the 150-foot telescoping RADAR
globe that had to be moved out of Ft. Pickens due to excessive
curiosity of visitors. A civilian employee of Pensacola NAS has
reported that there are now 18 of those RADAR vehicles operating
in the Gulf Breeze area.
What does all of this mean? We're checking the records, but
it is doubtful that there has been a significant increase in drug
smuggling activity in the area. Why has the Network News Media
taken such a hands-off approach to reporting these events outside
of the Pensacola area? Is there Government INTEREST in this case
of UFO activity? Is the Government turning some subtle screws to
clamp down on exposing what's really happening here? If so,
WHY? The answer may lie somewhere in the MJ-12 documents
that I've enclosed with this letter. These documents have been
available for over a year now, and have been widely published in
their entirety in (among others) The Danville Newspapers in
Pennsylvania and at least one major newsletter out of Cranston,
Rhode Island. Experts who have researched these documents
thoroughly say they are authentic. A memo from President
Truman makes direct reference to the MJ-12 operation. There
is more, much more, but this should be enough to encourage any
doubters out there that UFO's are REAL. Their purpose is now
fundamentally known. We may be powerless to stop it, although
some experts feel otherwise.
A letter to the President of the United States was mailed today
along with correspondence to several members of congress and
the Senate. The purpose is to seek official help in matters related
to the Gulf Breeze Sightings. Matters that involve the purpose
behind the visitations. Help is very much needed here. Although
exceptionally competent as I stated in my report to the UFO
Intelligence Community on April 21, 1988, there are but less than
a handful of part-time qualified investigators available in the
area to handle the massive workload. Scientific monitoring and
evaluation by civilian technologists is all but vacant here, except
for the exhaustive efforts of Dr. Bruce Maccabee, Ph.D. The
reassuring hand of Budd Hopkins has been quite welcome therapy
for those in need, but it is not nearly enough.
Will help be on the way? We'll keep you posted as the gears
and cogs of our bureaucracy oil up for action. The critics and
skeptics will not be able to sweep this intrusion under the carpet
with the guise of a hoax for long. Our prayers are with you and
all whose lives have been changed forever.
Bob Oechsler
UFO Investigator/Reporter


56
textfiles.com/ufo/gungho.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
Here is the relevant portion of the article mentioned by John Lear in
the ParaNet.Alpha Ufology message section of 1/16/88.It is excerpted
from the Feb. 88 issue of "GUNG-HO" (chinese for "worktogether").
It bills itself as, "The Magazine For The International Military Man". The
article is entitled, "Stealth and Beyond". It iswritten by "Al Frickey",
believed to be a pseudonym in order to protect his identity.
-Tom Mickus
*********************************
Stealth - And Beyond - A look at Aurora and Some "Unfunded Opportunities" (UFO)
During this article,
the Mach 3-plus (2,000 mph), SR-71 Blackbird hasbeen referred to for comparison
several times. The SR first flew about 25 years ago. Twenty years or so before
that, the hottest thing in th eair was the 450 mph P-51 Mustang. Today, there
is Aurora, the codename given to a methane-powered, hypersonic,
strategic-reconnais-sance aircraft capable of Mach 7 (5,000 mph) speed in the
250,000 foot regime. Aurora has a three-man crew and has been operational
since the mid-1980s, after a testing period in the Nellis Range. It is
refueled after conventional takeoff by a specially rigged KC-135Q tanker jet,
and can fly from Nellis to Kadena Air Force Base in Japan in less than two
and a half hours. Aurora first came to public attention in 1985, when an
unclassified procurement document disclosed its existence. Disclosure
heightened speculation that the system was a stealth fighter or bomber, and
program managers were happy to play along. Aurora's budget increase from
$80 million in FY 86 to $2.3 billion in FY 87 was unprecedented, given that:
(a) black-project budget figures are normally withheld; and (b) $80 million
is very little for development, and $2.3 billion is a lot for operations.
As for "UnFunded Opportunities," these are programs dealing with technology
levels so advanced that one Air Force officer involved in SR-71 development
said: "We are flight-testing vehicles that defy description. To compare them
conceptually to the SR-71 would be like comparing Leonardo da Vinci's
parachute design to the space shuttle." Other officers are similarily
emphatic about the nature of these new systems. "We have things that
are so far beyond the comphrehension of the average aviation authority as to
be really alien to our way of thinking," says one retired colonel. Rumour
has it some of these systems involve force-field technology, gravity-drive
systems, and "flying saucer" designs. Rumour further has it that these designs
are not necessarily of Earth human origin - but of who might have designed them
or helped us to do it, there is less talk. "Let's just put it this way,"
explained one retired Lockheed engineer. "We have things flying in the Nevada
desert that would make George Lucas drool." (Editor's note and conclusion:
The Air Force has had a unit at Nellis for several years; its name: Alien
Technology Center. The first question is, do you think they are studying
Mexicans? The center is rumored to have obtained alien ( not earth )
equipment and, at times personnel to help develop our new aircraft star wars
weaponry, etc. Yes, I know I sound crazy, but the rumour is aufully solid!
The Alien Technology Center is for real. Something remarkable has caused the
Russians to suddenly want to play ball, and I personally believe this could be
it. Sure, it sounds strange, but the most advanced known airplane in today's
world (SR-71) was secretly flying in 1963-64. Do you really think our best,
23 years later, is the F-16?)
END Opportunities (UFO)


58
textfiles.com/ufo/hall.rev Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
Uninvited Guests - Richard Hall
(A Documented History Of UFO Sightings, Alien Encounters & Coverups)
Aurora Press - 1988
379 Pages - Extensive Appendix
============================================================================
"Uninvited Guests" is probably one of the best books on the subject that I have
read so far this year. It is a book that should appeal to both the seasoned
Ufologist as well as serve as good background material for the novice. Richard
has a talent for communicating complex situations and technical concepts to the
non-technical person. His prose is factual, yet compelling.
The book is broken into three parts. The first covers confrontation with the
phenomenon including chapters on close encounters with vehicles, strange
technology, humanoids, Roswell, and finally abductions.
Part Two addresses the physical and spiritual side of the subject (without
resorting to New Age concepts). Chapters are titled "The UFO Anomaly", "Other
Realms", "Supermind", and one of the best, in my opinion, "Nuts and Bolts". In
this last chapter of the second part, Richard make a case for the philosophy
that given all the facts the the best theory is the simplest. The one that
relies on the least amount of assumptions is the best. Most all hypothesis in
this field rely on either a violation of known physical laws OR new laws that
have not yet been recognized by the scientific community. Mr. Hall carefully
carves up the carcass of the UFO animal and serves us up a platter neatly
dressed with the most straight forward scenario. The case that relies on the
fewest assumptions.
Part three (Evaluating the Unknown) deals with the the cloaked and covert
mysteries. Beginning with the skeptical side, Richard deftly maneuvers around
the government connection and winds his way through the Psychology of the
Extraterrestrial.
As if this were not enough he delivers, as a denouement, an comprehensive
appendix. Nearly one third of the books volume, the appendix has four sections.
The most voluminous are the case histories sporting an elaborate cross reference
which allows one to find cases based on the following topics: Abduction Reports,
Animal Reactions, Pursuit, Colors, Electromagnetic Effects, Heat, Humanoids,
Levitation, Light Beams, Light Engulfment, Odor, Perceptual Anomalies, Physical
Traces, Psychological Effects, Sound, Loss of Steering Control, Translocation,
and Vehicle Encounters. Or, if you care to, you can read the over 90 case
histories in chronological order from October 1, 1948 to November 17, 1986.
Appendix B contains over 40 pages of government documents.
Appendix C contains the MJ-12 documents
Appendix D is a glossary of acronyms and abbreviations.
If you can't find this great work in your local book store write to:
Aurora Press
P.O. Box 573
Santa Fe, NM 87504
==================
Reviewed by Ted Markley


58
textfiles.com/ufo/hallrev.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
Uninvited Guests - Richard Hall
(A Documented History Of UFO Sightings, Alien Encounters & Coverups)
Aurora Press - 1988
379 Pages - Extensive Appendix
============================================================================
"Uninvited Guests" is probably one of the best books on the subject that I have
read so far this year. It is a book that should appeal to both the seasoned
Ufologist as well as serve as good background material for the novice. Richard
has a talent for communicating complex situations and technical concepts to the
non-technical person. His prose is factual, yet compelling.
The book is broken into three parts. The first covers confrontation with the
phenomenon including chapters on close encounters with vehicles, strange
technology, humanoids, Roswell, and finally abductions.
Part Two addresses the physical and spiritual side of the subject (without
resorting to New Age concepts). Chapters are titled "The UFO Anomaly", "Other
Realms", "Supermind", and one of the best, in my opinion, "Nuts and Bolts". In
this last chapter of the second part, Richard make a case for the philosophy
that given all the facts the the best theory is the simplest. The one that
relies on the least amount of assumptions is the best. Most all hypothesis in
this field rely on either a violation of known physical laws OR new laws that
have not yet been recognized by the scientific community. Mr. Hall carefully
carves up the carcass of the UFO animal and serves us up a platter neatly
dressed with the most straight forward scenario. The case that relies on the
fewest assumptions.
Part three (Evaluating the Unknown) deals with the the cloaked and covert
mysteries. Beginning with the skeptical side, Richard deftly maneuvers around
the government connection and winds his way through the Psychology of the
Extraterrestrial.
As if this were not enough he delivers, as a denouement, an comprehensive
appendix. Nearly one third of the books volume, the appendix has four sections.
The most voluminous are the case histories sporting an elaborate cross reference
which allows one to find cases based on the following topics: Abduction Reports,
Animal Reactions, Pursuit, Colors, Electromagnetic Effects, Heat, Humanoids,
Levitation, Light Beams, Light Engulfment, Odor, Perceptual Anomalies, Physical
Traces, Psychological Effects, Sound, Loss of Steering Control, Translocation,
and Vehicle Encounters. Or, if you care to, you can read the over 90 case
histories in chronological order from October 1, 1948 to November 17, 1986.
Appendix B contains over 40 pages of government documents.
Appendix C contains the MJ-12 documents
Appendix D is a glossary of acronyms and abbreviations.
If you can't find this great work in your local book store write to:
Aurora Press
P.O. Box 573
Santa Fe, NM 87504
==================
Reviewed by Ted Markley


229
textfiles.com/ufo/hanger.thd Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
HANGER18.THD
Summary: this file is a thread from the Fido computer network UFO
Echo, early 1989, about Hanger 18 at Wright Patterson Air Force Base.
It has long been rumored that a UFO was stored there at some time.
This file consists of messages, edited for relevance, that say that
the UFO is no longer there, if it ever was.
There is also a description of another wreck that was brought in
to the Great Lakes Naval Base. Also, another one collected by the
Army and stored temporarily in a firehouse.
File length just over four typed pages.
An additional source for this subject is "The Roswell Incident"
by Bill Moore and Charles Berlitz.
====
From: John Frey To: Steven Northover 15-Jan-89
I know that Aquarius exists. A close relative of mine was
stationed at Great Lakes Naval Base when they brought in under VERY
HEAVY security a crashed UFO that was supposedly shot down by a
aircraft carrier back in the early '50s.
Also I have another relative that worked at Wright Patterson who
said "I've seen some strange business that I can't talk about", when
I asked about the rumors the UFO's stored there.
* Origin: Astral Board (1:129/39.0) 1(412)8246566
====
From: John Frey To:Kevin Colquitt 29-Jan-89
My aunt used to work at Wright-Pat. but they live far away in
Indiana now so I don't get to talk to her as much as I would like.
Anyway she heard many stories about strange experiments being carried
out by scientists there.
* Origin: Astral Board * Home of UFO echo * (1:129/39.0)
====
From: John Frey To: Joe Holland 22-Jan-89
Well,I don't know any major details about it other than what I
told except that it was structually damaged badly and they picked up
alot of wreckage. I don't know why they shot it or if there were any
bodies but I do know that my relative was asigned to moving some of
the material into a building late at night under TIGHT security. They
made him go through a metal detector before he left.
* Origin: Astral Board * Home of UFO echo * (1:129/39.0)
====
From: Dick Copits To: John Frey 20-Jan-89
I lived in Dayton and worked at Wright-Pat in fairborn for years
and although there were lots of rumors about UFO's, no one ever saw
anything dealing with them. I have been in EVERY building and hangar
on that base, and believe me, there ain't no such animal. You now
have an authoratative source that says - wherever they is, they
ain't at Wright-Pat.!!!
* Origin: (c)1988 Rogers & Blake (508)373-2204 (1:324/120)
====
From: John Frey To:Dick Copits 23-Jan-89
Hangar 18 exists! Notice I did not say there was a UFO in it. It
would be stupid to keep it in the same place long.
A UFO that crashed in PA was taken by a lot of people from the
Army back in the 50's. It was in the newspaper and a local reporter
researched it and found that it was taken by a Cleveland, OH group.
The TV reporter was unable to find any members of the group (since it
broke up in the late '50s) but did find a eyewitness of the recovery
operation that was a volunteer fireman. All the wreckage was hauled
from the crash site to the firehouse and later moved out with the
army. The reporter is very credible and so is the eyewitness.
* Origin: Astral Board * Home of UFO echo * (1:129/39.0)
====
From Joe Holland to Dick Copits 1/25/89
On what date did you first get into Hanger 18? Recently, or some
long time ago? Here below, for comparison, are three messages sent in
to Paranet Alpha AZ last April. After posting these, George Ray never
came on again with the follow up he was expecting to get.
Also, I have documentation that Senator Goldwater was denied
access to Hanger 18. (This item is corrected further on in this
file). And you got in easily, with no instructions about secrecy?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Paranet messages:
Msg: #7816 01-APR-88 From: George Ray To: Jim Delton
Jim why dont you go to Wright-Pat. AFB in ILL. (see later
correction) and see if you can get inside of the large black hanger
at the back of the base, after you have seen the inside of it then
come tell me the A.F. doesn't believe in UFOs.
====
Msg: #7837 01-APR-88 From: George Ray To: Nick Ianuzzi
The entire time that I was in the Air Force (over 12 years) I
only knew one person who had actually been inside that structure.
That was because he worked there. It seems that the government did
not like the job that the Security Police (AF COPS) were doing so the
control of this hanger and surrounding buildings was placed into the
hands of the N.S.A. and the Federal Police Agency (supposedly a
branch of the U.S. Marshall's Office, Under the Dept. of Justice).
Anyway prior to the security exchange this person had to do an
inventory. He said that the items that were in those buildings
could not be beleived. He told me some of what he had seen but the
time I just blew it off. This was almost ten years ago, I will try
to get hold of him this weekend to see if he will restate for me
just what he saw and I will give you a full report when I get it
onto a disk and upload it. Hopefully that should be done by Wed at
the outside.
====
Msg: #7839 01-APR-88 From: George Ray To: Jim Delton
Jim, I left an earlier message in regards to this. But I can tell
you this while stationed at an Alert Site in Alaska, we scrambled
more than once on objects that were not aircraft, the pilots would
not tell us what they saw, yet after every time this happened all
aircrews involved were immediately rotated back to the home station.
Even when they would wind up back out there with us they would not
tell us what they had seen. I know that this happened four times
while I was stationed there and I could not tell you how many times
total that it has happened. I just have to accept that they saw
something that was not of standard aircraft design and until they are
allowed to come forward with eye-witness reports, it will continue
to be a rumor generating mill.
(End Paranet messages of April 1, 1988. Fido thread resumes here)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Dick Copits To: Joe Holland 30-Jan-89
Joe - First, and I think symptomatic of the messages - Wright
Patterson AFB is NOT in Ill!!! It's in Fairborne Ohio, a short
distance from Dayton. It's also the home of the Air Force Logistics
Center, a SAC refueling wing and the home of the analysis section for
spacecraft observation photos.
Hangar 18 is very visible from Harshman road, generally has (and
always had) the doors open so that you can see in it with a good pair
of binoculars, and is painted (at least since 1946) grey! When you go
to the Air Force Museum, look past the xb-70 and there it is. No
guards, No searchlights, No barbed wire, and in fact if you come in
from the third street gate you can almost drive right up to it. Joe -
this is a MYSTIQUE that has been propagated by people such as your
friend who maybe even visited WP (even though it's never been in
Ill...).
In fact, take a weekend and fly into Dayton and drive over there
and see for yourself. It's an open base, and unless you screw around
the SAC planes you can pretty much move around and take pictures at
will. How long ago am I talking about? Last year. When was I there?
During the 60-70 era. My brother is still working there, has for the
last 29 years, and knows everyone who is anyone on the base. Believe
me, there's no UFO there, no parts there, and nothing else. Comments?
* Origin: (c)1988 Rogers & Blake (508)373-2204 (1:324/120)
====
From: Dick Copits To: Joe Holland 30-Jan-89
Joe - why do you think those messages have the dates they do?
April 1 !!!
* Origin: (c)1988 Rogers & Blake (508)373-2204 (1:324/120)
====
From Joe Holland to Dick Copits 2/3/89
Now, if we can take this apart somewhat, maybe we can study the
anatomy of a myth, or else find out why this information is
contradictory. Well, OK, I am accepting your description that hanger
18 is accessible.
>How long ago am I talking about? Last year. When was I there?
During the 60-70 era. My brother is still working there, has for the
last 29 years<
The remaining question then would be the dates. Its a long time,
42 years, back to 1947 when the UFO crashed in New Mexico. There
might also be a question about which building it is.
The Goldwater letter, which I will post separately, is dated
1979, and refers to an earlier time. Someone should find out from
him, how much earlier. But what I missed before is that the letter
does not say hanger 18, but rather "a facility at Wright Patterson".
This letter appears on page 41 of the Nov 88 issue of UFO Universe.
But an introduction on page 3 has already assumed that this is
Hanger 18. Also in this introduction, Senator Goldwater is quoted in
another quotation, but this again does not say Hanger 18, but "in the
building where the information is stored". Note the word is not "the
UFO" but "the information". The magazine appears not to have strictly
conformed in the text, to the evidence that it presented.
The April 1 letter from George Ray refers to a time "almost ten
years" earlier. This is in conflict with what I assume you said in
your message, quoted above, about 29 years. Since you are on the
scene, I give my credence to you. George Ray was quoting second
hand, and might have never been to Wright-Patterson, or so it might
seem from having gotten the location wrong.
I noticed the April 1st date, and regarded it with suspicion,
when I first re-ran the message into Paranet last year. But I missed
the wrong location of Wright-Patterson, so I'm glad I chose to
repeat all three messages this time, instead of just one.
*Source: Third World, Chatsworth CA 1(818)7009591
====
From Joe Holland to All 2/3/89
Here is one of the letters from Senator Barry Goldwater about
Wright-Patterson:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
United States Senate
Commitee on Commerce, Science,
and Transportation
Washington DC 20510
April 11, 1979
Mr. Lee M Graham
526 West Maple
Monrovia, California 91016
Dear Mr. Graham:
It is true I was denied access to a faclity at
Wright-Patterson. Because I never got in, I can't
tell you what was inside. We both know about the
rumors.
Apart from that, let me make my position clear: I
do not beleive that we are the only planet, and of
some two billion that exist, that has life on it. I
have never seen what I would call a UFO, but I have
intelligent friends who have, so I can sort of argue
either way.
Sincerely,
(Signature)
Barry Goldwater.
---------------------------
Source: UFO Universe (magazine) Nov 88 page 41
See also page 3.
351 W. 54th ST. NY, NY 10012.
====
From Joe Holland to Dick Copits 2/3/89
Wright Patterson is plainly marked on my AAA Road Atlas as on
the east side of Dayton, Ohio. Everything should be so easy to
check! I had meant to look it up, but it never occured to me someone
would miss on a thing like that. Well, I'm the one who goes around
reminding people that things may be easier to check than you think,
and trying to get people to do it.
If that story is true about the crashed disk, then the disk went
somewhere. Why they would move it a long distance would be a
question, although there could be a number of reasons. If the
expertise for rebuilding craft existed back then at Wright-Patterson,
as it does now, then that's a possible answer. Also, you say they
look at the space photos there.
However, it would have soon become evident, from your
description, that Wright-Patterson was not a highest security area,
so it would have been reasonable to move it.
-------------------
File prepared by Joe Holland, 2/23/89.


229
textfiles.com/ufo/hangerthd.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
HANGER18.THD
Summary: this file is a thread from the Fido computer network UFO
Echo, early 1989, about Hanger 18 at Wright Patterson Air Force Base.
It has long been rumored that a UFO was stored there at some time.
This file consists of messages, edited for relevance, that say that
the UFO is no longer there, if it ever was.
There is also a description of another wreck that was brought in
to the Great Lakes Naval Base. Also, another one collected by the
Army and stored temporarily in a firehouse.
File length just over four typed pages.
An additional source for this subject is "The Roswell Incident"
by Bill Moore and Charles Berlitz.
====
From: John Frey To: Steven Northover 15-Jan-89
I know that Aquarius exists. A close relative of mine was
stationed at Great Lakes Naval Base when they brought in under VERY
HEAVY security a crashed UFO that was supposedly shot down by a
aircraft carrier back in the early '50s.
Also I have another relative that worked at Wright Patterson who
said "I've seen some strange business that I can't talk about", when
I asked about the rumors the UFO's stored there.
* Origin: Astral Board (1:129/39.0) 1(412)8246566
====
From: John Frey To:Kevin Colquitt 29-Jan-89
My aunt used to work at Wright-Pat. but they live far away in
Indiana now so I don't get to talk to her as much as I would like.
Anyway she heard many stories about strange experiments being carried
out by scientists there.
* Origin: Astral Board * Home of UFO echo * (1:129/39.0)
====
From: John Frey To: Joe Holland 22-Jan-89
Well,I don't know any major details about it other than what I
told except that it was structually damaged badly and they picked up
alot of wreckage. I don't know why they shot it or if there were any
bodies but I do know that my relative was asigned to moving some of
the material into a building late at night under TIGHT security. They
made him go through a metal detector before he left.
* Origin: Astral Board * Home of UFO echo * (1:129/39.0)
====
From: Dick Copits To: John Frey 20-Jan-89
I lived in Dayton and worked at Wright-Pat in fairborn for years
and although there were lots of rumors about UFO's, no one ever saw
anything dealing with them. I have been in EVERY building and hangar
on that base, and believe me, there ain't no such animal. You now
have an authoratative source that says - wherever they is, they
ain't at Wright-Pat.!!!
* Origin: (c)1988 Rogers & Blake (508)373-2204 (1:324/120)
====
From: John Frey To:Dick Copits 23-Jan-89
Hangar 18 exists! Notice I did not say there was a UFO in it. It
would be stupid to keep it in the same place long.
A UFO that crashed in PA was taken by a lot of people from the
Army back in the 50's. It was in the newspaper and a local reporter
researched it and found that it was taken by a Cleveland, OH group.
The TV reporter was unable to find any members of the group (since it
broke up in the late '50s) but did find a eyewitness of the recovery
operation that was a volunteer fireman. All the wreckage was hauled
from the crash site to the firehouse and later moved out with the
army. The reporter is very credible and so is the eyewitness.
* Origin: Astral Board * Home of UFO echo * (1:129/39.0)
====
From Joe Holland to Dick Copits 1/25/89
On what date did you first get into Hanger 18? Recently, or some
long time ago? Here below, for comparison, are three messages sent in
to Paranet Alpha AZ last April. After posting these, George Ray never
came on again with the follow up he was expecting to get.
Also, I have documentation that Senator Goldwater was denied
access to Hanger 18. (This item is corrected further on in this
file). And you got in easily, with no instructions about secrecy?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Paranet messages:
Msg: #7816 01-APR-88 From: George Ray To: Jim Delton
Jim why dont you go to Wright-Pat. AFB in ILL. (see later
correction) and see if you can get inside of the large black hanger
at the back of the base, after you have seen the inside of it then
come tell me the A.F. doesn't believe in UFOs.
====
Msg: #7837 01-APR-88 From: George Ray To: Nick Ianuzzi
The entire time that I was in the Air Force (over 12 years) I
only knew one person who had actually been inside that structure.
That was because he worked there. It seems that the government did
not like the job that the Security Police (AF COPS) were doing so the
control of this hanger and surrounding buildings was placed into the
hands of the N.S.A. and the Federal Police Agency (supposedly a
branch of the U.S. Marshall's Office, Under the Dept. of Justice).
Anyway prior to the security exchange this person had to do an
inventory. He said that the items that were in those buildings
could not be beleived. He told me some of what he had seen but the
time I just blew it off. This was almost ten years ago, I will try
to get hold of him this weekend to see if he will restate for me
just what he saw and I will give you a full report when I get it
onto a disk and upload it. Hopefully that should be done by Wed at
the outside.
====
Msg: #7839 01-APR-88 From: George Ray To: Jim Delton
Jim, I left an earlier message in regards to this. But I can tell
you this while stationed at an Alert Site in Alaska, we scrambled
more than once on objects that were not aircraft, the pilots would
not tell us what they saw, yet after every time this happened all
aircrews involved were immediately rotated back to the home station.
Even when they would wind up back out there with us they would not
tell us what they had seen. I know that this happened four times
while I was stationed there and I could not tell you how many times
total that it has happened. I just have to accept that they saw
something that was not of standard aircraft design and until they are
allowed to come forward with eye-witness reports, it will continue
to be a rumor generating mill.
(End Paranet messages of April 1, 1988. Fido thread resumes here)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Dick Copits To: Joe Holland 30-Jan-89
Joe - First, and I think symptomatic of the messages - Wright
Patterson AFB is NOT in Ill!!! It's in Fairborne Ohio, a short
distance from Dayton. It's also the home of the Air Force Logistics
Center, a SAC refueling wing and the home of the analysis section for
spacecraft observation photos.
Hangar 18 is very visible from Harshman road, generally has (and
always had) the doors open so that you can see in it with a good pair
of binoculars, and is painted (at least since 1946) grey! When you go
to the Air Force Museum, look past the xb-70 and there it is. No
guards, No searchlights, No barbed wire, and in fact if you come in
from the third street gate you can almost drive right up to it. Joe -
this is a MYSTIQUE that has been propagated by people such as your
friend who maybe even visited WP (even though it's never been in
Ill...).
In fact, take a weekend and fly into Dayton and drive over there
and see for yourself. It's an open base, and unless you screw around
the SAC planes you can pretty much move around and take pictures at
will. How long ago am I talking about? Last year. When was I there?
During the 60-70 era. My brother is still working there, has for the
last 29 years, and knows everyone who is anyone on the base. Believe
me, there's no UFO there, no parts there, and nothing else. Comments?
* Origin: (c)1988 Rogers & Blake (508)373-2204 (1:324/120)
====
From: Dick Copits To: Joe Holland 30-Jan-89
Joe - why do you think those messages have the dates they do?
April 1 !!!
* Origin: (c)1988 Rogers & Blake (508)373-2204 (1:324/120)
====
From Joe Holland to Dick Copits 2/3/89
Now, if we can take this apart somewhat, maybe we can study the
anatomy of a myth, or else find out why this information is
contradictory. Well, OK, I am accepting your description that hanger
18 is accessible.
>How long ago am I talking about? Last year. When was I there?
During the 60-70 era. My brother is still working there, has for the
last 29 years<
The remaining question then would be the dates. Its a long time,
42 years, back to 1947 when the UFO crashed in New Mexico. There
might also be a question about which building it is.
The Goldwater letter, which I will post separately, is dated
1979, and refers to an earlier time. Someone should find out from
him, how much earlier. But what I missed before is that the letter
does not say hanger 18, but rather "a facility at Wright Patterson".
This letter appears on page 41 of the Nov 88 issue of UFO Universe.
But an introduction on page 3 has already assumed that this is
Hanger 18. Also in this introduction, Senator Goldwater is quoted in
another quotation, but this again does not say Hanger 18, but "in the
building where the information is stored". Note the word is not "the
UFO" but "the information". The magazine appears not to have strictly
conformed in the text, to the evidence that it presented.
The April 1 letter from George Ray refers to a time "almost ten
years" earlier. This is in conflict with what I assume you said in
your message, quoted above, about 29 years. Since you are on the
scene, I give my credence to you. George Ray was quoting second
hand, and might have never been to Wright-Patterson, or so it might
seem from having gotten the location wrong.
I noticed the April 1st date, and regarded it with suspicion,
when I first re-ran the message into Paranet last year. But I missed
the wrong location of Wright-Patterson, so I'm glad I chose to
repeat all three messages this time, instead of just one.
*Source: Third World, Chatsworth CA 1(818)7009591
====
From Joe Holland to All 2/3/89
Here is one of the letters from Senator Barry Goldwater about
Wright-Patterson:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
United States Senate
Commitee on Commerce, Science,
and Transportation
Washington DC 20510
April 11, 1979
Mr. Lee M Graham
526 West Maple
Monrovia, California 91016
Dear Mr. Graham:
It is true I was denied access to a faclity at
Wright-Patterson. Because I never got in, I can't
tell you what was inside. We both know about the
rumors.
Apart from that, let me make my position clear: I
do not beleive that we are the only planet, and of
some two billion that exist, that has life on it. I
have never seen what I would call a UFO, but I have
intelligent friends who have, so I can sort of argue
either way.
Sincerely,
(Signature)
Barry Goldwater.
---------------------------
Source: UFO Universe (magazine) Nov 88 page 41
See also page 3.
351 W. 54th ST. NY, NY 10012.
====
From Joe Holland to Dick Copits 2/3/89
Wright Patterson is plainly marked on my AAA Road Atlas as on
the east side of Dayton, Ohio. Everything should be so easy to
check! I had meant to look it up, but it never occured to me someone
would miss on a thing like that. Well, I'm the one who goes around
reminding people that things may be easier to check than you think,
and trying to get people to do it.
If that story is true about the crashed disk, then the disk went
somewhere. Why they would move it a long distance would be a
question, although there could be a number of reasons. If the
expertise for rebuilding craft existed back then at Wright-Patterson,
as it does now, then that's a possible answer. Also, you say they
look at the space photos there.
However, it would have soon become evident, from your
description, that Wright-Patterson was not a highest security area,
so it would have been reasonable to move it.
-------------------
File prepared by Joe Holland, 2/23/89.


279
textfiles.com/ufo/hardy1 Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,279 @@
(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2)
Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501
Sponsored by Vangard Sciences
PO BOX 1031
Mesquite, TX 75150
There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS
on duplicating, publishing or distributing the
files on KeelyNet except where noted!
August 1, 1992
HARDY1.ASC
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This file is a short description intended to describe a drawing
listed on KeelyNet as Hardy1.GIF.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Double Helix Pyramid Beam
In 1986, I (Jerry Decker) had the good fortune to attend a Crystal
Conference held in Irving, Texas. At that meeting, there were many
new age types, yet two presenters really caught my interest.
Mary and Dean Hardy of Allegan, Michigan lectured on the ongoing
work she and Dean had been carrying out with respect to pyramid
energy. At first, I had much trouble accepting what I was hearing
but when a slide was shown of a pyramid emitting a double helix beam
of energy when excited by a Tesla coil, I was hooked.
Mary frequently referred to an energy which she called "TACHION". I
asked for clarification and she said the word was coined by Kenneth
Killick to describe an effect he had investigated involving "tacky
ions". This is by no means the faster than light particles known as
TACHYONS. Kenneth has the ability to see and manipulate energy of
various sorts and worked with the Hardy's and others for many years.
After that lecture so many years ago, Mary and Dean have become good
friends and valuable contacts. When they visit Dallas, they often
stay at my house and we discuss many subjects.
Mary and Dean have written two excellent books, Pyramid Energy and a
revised edition available from them at the address at the end of
this file. It is one of the best books on pyramid energies that I
have read primarily because it involves the use of energy to form
what has been termed "Standing Columnar Waves". It also deals with
patterns that seem to influence energy for specific effects.
Doug Benjamin is an energy researcher who has investigated geometric
angles derived from Egyptian sources and actual experiments. These
angles are basically 3 sided pyramids (2 dimensional) which
correspond to specific organs of the body. When properly used, they
can improve the energy level and thus the health of the targeted
organ.
Doug has known and worked with the Hardy's for many years and had a
photograph of the pyramid slide that so fascinated me. He kindly
gave us a copy of this photo for our archives. Thanks to the
Page 1
efforts of Ron Barker, we now have this image scanned in and
available for study and hopefully duplication.
An interesting story about Doug happened at a Global Sciences
Congress in Denver in 1989. He and I were talking about several
subjects and he pulled what appeared to be a ceramic tile from his
pocket. Doug asked if the tile looked familiar and I remarked that
it looked like a heat tile from the space shuttle.
Doug said it had an unusual history in that he had "bribed" some
Egyptian government officials to allow him access to a non-tourist
area. That area was of much interest to him as it consisted of 3
pyramids which turned out to be connected by a single tunnel.
He then drew a diagram of it and asked what I thought it might
represent.
Ziggurat style
/\ /\ /\
/ \ /__\ / \
/ \ /____\ / \
/ \ /______\ / \
___/________\_________/________\_________/________\___
| | | | | |
| |_______________| |_______________| |
|________________________________________|
Doug said the pyramids on the left and right were normal pyramids
while the center one was a ziggurat (stepped). Now if energy was in
fact somehow received or transmitted by such a stepped pyramid, it
would function as a lens commonly termed a FRESNEL.
Therefore, it appeared to be some form of SCALAR INTERFEROMETER with
the left and right pyramids acting as either transmitters or
receivers and the center acting as a concentrating lens or targeting
lens.
These tiles lined the connecting corridors between all three
pyramids and would seem to be some form of channel for a very high
intensity energy.
Interestingly enough, in Mary and Dean's many trips to Egypt, they
have found several interior anomalies in the Cheops pyramid that are
commonly known, yet from their research, they have come up with a
new twist on what these anomalies were produced by or used for.
I will not go into great detail as it is covered quite well in their
fascinating book, however, Mary and Dean feel that the Ark of the
Covenant was an energy accumulator that was used in conjunction with
the pyramids. They cite a mysterious channel in one large room of
Cheops which would perfectly fit the Ark. But the best twist yet is
a recessed chamber which is cut into the wall in such a fashion that
the Ark would fit directly in the largest lower space. That chamber
is stepped in a pyramid type fashion also and is marked with
SPIRALLING SCORCH marks that run to the top of the chamber!
Mary and Dean believe that the Ark was charged and placed into this
recessed chamber. When the Ark was triggered to release its
Page 2
accumlated energy, it discharged upwards and formed the spiralling
configuration that is now seen as the scorch marks on the wall.
The scanned image of the Hardy1.GIF file shows something quite
fascinating with regard to such a comparison of the Ark (Tesla Coil)
placed in a pyramid structure to produce this Double Helix
spiralling energy emanating from the tip.
The original photo was taken by Dr. J.D. Nelson of the University of
Wyoming. From the limited information we have concerning how it was
done, the pyramid shape is made of soldered copper sheet, possibly
with a crystal placed at the apex.
The Tesla coil is placed so that the electrical emission occurs at
the 2/3's power point of the pyramid. We do not know the voltage
though we think it is approximately 200,000 Volts.
Dean says he thinks that the light curtain that projects from the
pyramid due to the Tesla coil arcing is NOT acrylic sheet but that
the pyramid is supported by acrylic columns.
It would seem that acrylic sheet would help to concentrate the ions
and further intensify the energy emissions, so there is room for
experiment here.
Also note that this photo was taken in a perfectly dark room and
with a time exposure of about 1 to 3 minutes, (our information
regarding the technical details is very limited).
Some other points of speculation about possible ways of duplicating
and or optimizing this phenomenal experiment :
1) Use a tunable Tesla coil and try various frequencies for
different or more pronounced effects.
2) Try other types of metal than copper or even use alloys or
layered sheets.
3) Try a crystal on the apex, various types and/or shapes.
4) Try to redirect or channel the double helix energy through a
wire or conduit.
5) Arrange to bombard plants to see if the energy is beneficial
or destructive to living tissues (this might serve as the
ULTIMATE MWO, see MWO1 on KeelyNet).
6) For those familiar with Reich's Orgone Energy, such a hybrid
might produce bizarre and even hazardous effects, so be
careful.
Just one word of warning, we have information that leads us to
believe that crystals used in conjunction with high voltage energy
sources might be hazardous if the apexes of excited crystals are
pointed towards living tissue, so TAKE THIS AS A WARNING!
We urge further experiments and sharing of your findings in such
areas. Thanks for your attention.
Page 3
If you would like to purchase a copy of the Hardy's fascinating book
PYRAMID ENERGY, with much original research, you may write them at :
Mary & Dean Hardy
3252 Lakeview Drive
Allegan, Michigan
49010
The phone number there is (616) 673-4849.
Please mention that you heard about them from either KeelyNet or
Vangard Sciences (to give'em fair warning...hehehe), thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have comments or other information relating to such topics
as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the
Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page.
Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If we can be of service, you may contact
Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4
X-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X
Another file downloaded from: The NIRVANAnet(tm) Seven
& the Temple of the Screaming Electron Taipan Enigma 510/935-5845
Burn This Flag Zardoz 408/363-9766
realitycheck Poindexter Fortran 510/527-1662
Lies Unlimited Mick Freen 801/278-2699
The New Dork Sublime Biffnix 415/864-DORK
The Shrine Rif Raf 206/794-6674
Planet Mirth Simon Jester 510/786-6560
"Raw Data for Raw Nerves"
X-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X

107
textfiles.com/ufo/harvest1.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
Jeff Walker #64 @7317
Wed Jun 26 22:43:38 1991
<20> Ask_UFO #101
Dt: 18-Apr-91 13:02
By: Don Ecker
To: All
Re: The `HARVEST' Continues
This file was provided to the ParaNet<sm> Information Service by
UFO Magazine. All rights are reserved. You may distribute this file
freely as long as this header remains intact.
Date prepared: 4/18/91
Contributed by: Staff UFO Magazine
=================================================================
UFO Magazine Vol. 5 No. 4 ( Coping With Abduction )
The `Harvest' Continues
ANIMAL MUTILATION UPDATE
by Linda Moulton Howe
In 1989, there were so many cattle mutilations in southern Idaho
that Bear Lake County Sheriff Brent Bunn told me, "We haven't seen
anything like this since the 1970s." Sheriff Bunn sent me 16
neatly-typed "Investigation Reports" about cattle mutilations that
had taken place in his county between May and December. Over half
occurred in a remote valley called Nounan. Only eighty people live
there. Ranching is their main income source, and cattle are
precious. Disease and predators are old and well-understood
enemies.
What descended on Nounan, Idaho in the summer and fall of 1989
was not understood-and it scared people. Bloodless and precise
cuts-that's what bothers people. Officer Gregg Athay wrote in his
mutilation report, "There were no visible signs of the cause of
death. It appeared that only the soft tissues (nose, lips and
tongue) were gone off the head and four nipples off the bag. Again
there was no blood on the hair and ground."
No veterinarian report was made on that cow. But a month earlier,
Dr. Charles Merrell at the Bear Lake Animal Hospital examined a
dead Hereford cow. Dr. Merrell wrote after his examination: "Some
time between approximately 8 p.m. (August 31, 1989) and 7 a.m. 1
September, the anus, vagina to include uterus and ovaries and all
four teats (one teat deeply incised, the others shallow cuts) were
removed by knife cuts around these tissues. There were no signs of
injury and no blood to be found on the ground. " A neighbor,
Bernice Laughter, said she saw lights in that area about 2 a.m. on
September 1.
Disks reported
Throughout the history of animal mutilations, since 1967, there
have been numerous eyewitness accounts of large, glowing disks or
"silent helicopters " over pastures where dead animals are later
found. One Waco, Texas rancher said he encountered two four-foot
tall, light green-colored "creatures " with large, black, slanted
eyes, carrying a calf which was later found dead and mutilated. In
1983, a Missouri couple watched through binoculars as two small
beings in tight-fitting silver suits worked on a cow in a nearby
pasture. The alien heads were large and white in color. Nearby, a
tall, green-skinned "lizard man" stood glaring with eyes slit by
vertical pupils like a crocodiles's. Several hypnosis sessions with
various UFO abductees have produced information suggesting that the
alien intruders are using the tissues and blood fluids for genetic
experimentation and sustenance.
One Missouri woman, who has experienced repeated encounters with
small grey beings that have large, black eyes, sid the creatures
told her, "We use substances from cows in an essential biochemical
process for our survival." In the 1989 continuing harvest, over
half of the Idaho mutilations were young calves. One mutilated
calf, found December 24, north of Downey, Idaho, was found lying on
its back with the navel, rectum and genitals neatly cut out of the
steer's white belly. No blood was found anywhere. (See photo, p.
18.) This steer calf was taken for an autopsy to Dr. Chris Oats,
D.V.M., at the Hawthorne Animal Hospital. Dr. Oats checked all the
vital organs and was unable to determine the cause of death. During
the autopsy, a sharp cut was found in the right chest area, and Dr.
Oats discovered that a main artery had been severed under the chest
wound.
She was surprised that "the steer had lost a large amount of
blood, but [she] could not understand where it went to. " There was
no blood on the steer or on the ground. Dr. Oats also determined
that the steer had not been dragged by the neck or tied up around
the feet.
Residents of southern Idaho weren't alone in their fear and con-
fusion about the mutilations. William Veenhuizen woke up on July
17,
1989 to find his finest cow mutilated about 100 yards from his
farmhouse in Maple Valley, Washington, southeast of Seattle. The
six-year-old female was due to calve in about three weeks. But
mutilators had cut away a smooth oval section of the cow's mouth,
removed a section of jaw with teeth, excised the tongue and cut out
the entire udder, vagina and rectal area. The calf was still inside
the belly.
Something woke Mr. Veenhuizen up around I a.m. that day, he
remembers. He even put his shoes on and went outside, but he
couldn't see or hear anything out of the ordinary. He was so upset
after the mutilation, he started keeping the rest of his animals
inside the barn. "A neighbor said to me that coyotes did it," he
said, "but I said the coyotes don't have that sharp a knife."


103
textfiles.com/ufo/harvest2.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
Jeff Walker #64 @7317
Wed Jun 26 22:45:05 1991
Other farms hit
Bill Veenhuizen wasn't the only farmer in Maple Valley,
Washington having mutilation problems. On Sunday, November 11, two
female sheep were found with their sexual organs removed. The
Hicks-Raburn King County Police found small holes on the carcasses
that they concluded might be BB gun pellet wounds, but no pellets
were found.
Mystery technology
Another major question: Had the blood been drained from all those
animals without cutting them? If alien life forms are responsible,
and blood is a fluid they need for sustenance, do the aliens have
a technology which can transfer molecules of blood from within a
living system and leave mysteriously dead animals behind having no
cuts at all: The same question might apply to the hundreds of wild
horses which were found dead in Nevada in 1989.
In November, 1989, in Red Cloud, Nebraska, rancher Ron Bartels
found a large, 1,000 lb. Chianina cow dead and mutilated. The
Franklin County Sheriff Department investigated, and veterinarian
Carl Guthrie, D.V.M., was asked to do a necropsy. In his report, he
stated that a four-inch straight incision had been made over the
cervical trachea. Beyond that cut inside the animal, over eight
inches of trachea and esophagus had been surgically removed- "The
skin over the abdomen was removed in a clear, demarcated line-no
musculature disturbed," he noted. And the rectum and vagina were
cored out.
Predators discounted
Dr. Guthrie concluded: "There were definite signs of suspicious
acts to the body of this cow-the nature in which the skin was
severed and removed was not characteristic of a predator strike."
In addition to those cuts described by Dr. Guthrie, the neat
circular patch of skin removed around the cow's eye, along with the
eyeball, has been one of the hallmarks of animal mutilations since
the 1970s. Rancher Ron Bartels told me, ". . . after several days,
there had been no predation, and with the number of coyotes we now
have in this area, they completely strip a carcass very quickly."
But nothing touched the strangely cut cow. How are the cuts made:
In my book An Alien Harvest, published in 1989, I show for the
first time that tissue gathered from mutilator cuts in Arkansas on
March 11, 1989, revealed the following characteristics under
microscopic examination:
1) The line is pinpoint thin;
2) The line was subjected to high heat, probably 300 degrees
Fahrenheit or above, leaving a hard and darkened edge;
3) The cuts were made rapidly, probably in two minutes or less,
because there is no inflammatory cell destruction which typically
begins in a few minutes after any trauma to tissue
(See contrasting photomicrographs).
In addition to the 1989 mutilation reports in Idaho, Washington,
Nebraska and Arkansas, there have been other cases in Colorado,
Oklahoma, Missouri and Florida. Further, over 800 wild horses in
Nevada have died mysteriously, about 70 domestic cats have been
Found dead and bloodlessly mutilated in Tustin, California and 30
more cats in the East Bay of San Francisco. A city employee in
Setauket, Long Island, NY, has reported to me that about a dozen
raccoons, opossums, dogs and cats have been found in Percy Rayner
bloodlessly mutilated with cuts similar to cows. I have also
received calls about mutilations in Canada, but have no firm
photographs or reports.
After An Alien Harvest was released in June of 1989, I received
a letter from a security guard in Denver, Colorado. He described a
night in August when he was patrolling the grounds of a large
corporation west of the city. From his truck, he could see a large
circle of lights in the dark sky. The lights remained stationary
over a pasture a few hundred feet from the security guard. He was
afraid to report the unidentified flying objects, because UFOs
meant ridicule and he didn't want to lose his job. But he felt
guilty about not reporting it, because the next morning he watched
a farmer gather up a couple of dead and mutilated cows from the
pasture where the lights had hovered overhead. He asked me, "What
kind of technology are we talking about? I never took my eyes off
those lights. There was no beam, no sound, nothing. How did they do
it?"
That's a question which has haunted ranchers and law enforcement
since the first worldwide reported mutilation of a horse in 1967.
Not only how-but why? If alien life forms are intruding on this
planet and harvesting from animals and humans, is a program of
genetic experimentation and sustenance the answer? Or only part of
a larger alien need? Will the 1990s finally bring humans face to
face with an alien intelligence that has secretly used earth life
for eons? As we become more conscious of its presence, will we
learn that the alien intent is simply to survive without human
help? Or is there some larger and more complex alien scheme which
could challenge the future of human existence?
-Linda Moulton Howe-
End of file.


600
textfiles.com/ufo/hastings.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,600 @@
===================================================================
THE CRUCIBLE <<UFONET I>> * 416-237-1204 * 12/24/96 HST (1:250/440)
===================================================================
THE MJ-12 AFFAIR:
Facts, Questions, Comments
Robert Hastings
March 1, 1989
FACTS
-----
First, it has been established that "Falcon", one of the
principle sources of the MJ-12 material, is Richard C. Doty,
formerly attached to District 17 Air Force Office of Special
Investigations (AFOSI) at Kirtland Air Force Base, Albuquerque,
New Mexico. Sgt. Doty retired from the U.S. Air Force on
October 1, 1988.
How do I know that Doty is "Falcon"? During a recent telephone
conversation, Linda Moulton Howe told me that when Sgt. Doty
invited her to his office at Kirtland AFB in early April 1983,
and showed her a purportedly authentic U.S. Government document
on UFOs, he identified himself as code-name "Falcon" and stated
that it was Bill Moore who had given him that name.
Also, in early December 1988, a ranking member of the production
team responsible for the "UFO Cover Up? -- Live" television
documentary confirmed that Doty is "Falcon". This same individual
also identified the second MJ-12 source who appeared on the
program, "Condor", as Robert Collins who was, until recently, a
Captain in the U.S. Air Force. Like Doty, he was stationed at
KAFB when he left the service late last year.
Both Doty and Collins deny any involvement in the MJ-12 affair.
However, Linda Howe has issued a sworn affidavit, agreeing to
testify under penalty of perjury, relating to the events during
the course of her meeting with Richard "Falcon" Doty at KAFB in
1983 (Enclosures A and B). Thus far, Doty has *not* issued a
sworn affidavit, or agreed to testify under penalty of perjury,
to re-enforce his denial that the events of his meeting with
Howe occured as she has described them.
For the moment, I will not identify the "UFO Coverup? -- Live"
source who identified Doty as "Falcon" and Collins as "Condor".
I do, however, encourage others to independently attempt to
secure confirmation of the statements that he has already made.
At least two producers connected with the documentary know the
facts.
QUESTIONS
---------
Now that "Falcon" and "Condor" have been identified, it seems
prudent to examine the past activities of Richard Doty and Bob
Collins to see whether those activities tend to add to, or
detract from, the credibility of the MJ-12 scenario that they
have so vigorously promoted within the ufological community.
That is, do their actions reflect a genuine attempt to release
authentic above top secret information to the public or, on the
other hand, suggest a disinformation campaign designed to
confuse and mislead?
Let's begin with Doty. Sgt. Richard Charles Doty first received
widespread attention after he wrote the now well-known AFOSI
Complaint Form relating to UFO sightings near Kirtland AFB in
1980 (Enclosure C). This document, typed and signed by Doty,
takes on new significance in the light of an incident known as
the "Weitzel Hoax". Briefly summarized, this odd tale unfolded
as follows: In 1981, the Aerial Phenomena Research Organization
received an anonymous letter from an individual who claimed to
be a USAF airman assigned to the 1550th Aircrew Training and
Testing Wing at Kirtland AFB (Enclosure D). The writer further
claimed to have had a rather dramatic UFO sighting, together
with a Craig Weitzel and others. The letter relates that Weitzel
reported the sighting to a "Mr. Dody" (sic) at Kirtland AFB OSI.
Researcher Benton Jamison located and contacted Weitzel in 1985
(Enclosure E). Weitzel stated that he did indeed report a UFO
sighting to Sgt. Richard Doty in 1980, but that the actual
incident in no way resembled the CEIII experience described in
the anonymous letter. Weitzel also denies that he was subsequently
contacted by a mysterious individual who demanded that he turn
over any photographs that he might have taken of the UFO, as the
letter claims.
So, it would appear that the writer of the anonymous letter,
whomever he was, took a real event and greatly embellished it
for some reason.
And why is this letter so significant as regards questions about
Sgt. Richard Doty's credibility as a source for allegedly secret
government documents? Simply because careful analysis of the
anonymous letter reveals that it was almost certainly typed on
the same typewriter used by Doty to complete the 1980 OSI
Complaint Form.
Enclosure F is a report by researcher Brad Sparks which address
typeface irregularities and stylistic traits that are identical
in both the anonymous airman's letter and Sgt. Doty's report.
Actually, Spark's typeface analysis is incomplete. In addition
to the irregular "u" that he identifies, it can be seen that the
letters "gh", as in the word "sighting", are jammed together in
identical fashion in both the letter and the report. Lower case
"o" is also jammed against various letters that follow it in
the "Weitzel" letter and Doty's Complaint Form.
A professionally-conducted analysis of these flaws should be
able to determine, with a reasonable degree of certainty, whether
an "anonymous airman" used Doty's typewriter to compose his
overdrawn tale. If this fact can be established then two obvious
questions arise: 1) How and why did the unidentified airman
from the 1550th Aircrew Training and Testing Wing gain access to
Sgt. Doty's writer at OSI? 2) On the other hand, did Doty himself
type the letter and, therefore, attempt to perpetrate a hoax for
some unknown reason?
Because it has been established that Richard Doty is "Falcon",
the chief source for the MJ-12 material, it now seems imperative
thoroughly investigate this incident to resolve these unanswered
questions. The second question, in particular, is of obvious
importance. Perhaps the Fund For UFO Research, which has recently
solicited contributions to further investigate the MJ-12 affair,
would consider funding an expert typographical analysis of both
the anonymous letter and Doty's Complaint Form to determine
whether or not there is a link between the two.
Even more disturbing than the implications of the "Weitzel Hoax"
is an incident that raises the strongest doubts about Richard
Doty's credibility as a source of information and documents
relating to the U.S. Government's involvement with UFOs. Infor-
mation about this incident comes from Dr. Bruce Maccabee and
links Doty to the so-called Ellsworth AFB hoax. According to
Maccabee, Bill Moore has acknowledged that Richard Doty confessed
to forging the document that describes the alleged events
connected with the Ellsworth case (Enclosure G). Doty apparently
claims that the UFO incident there actually occurred, just as
described in the document, and that he only wanted to bring it
to the public attention. He, therefore, proceeded to type the
"document" himself, incorporating the "facts" that he claimed
to know to be true, and then released the bogus report to
various researchers. Enclosure H is an expose written by Bob
Pratt, and published in the January 1984 issues of the *MUFON
Journal*, describing his investigation of this hoax.
If it can be established, beyond any doubt, that Richard Doty
forged the Ellsworth AFB document, what would that say about
his credibility as a chief source for the MJ-12 material, under
the guise of "Falcon"?
MORE QUESTIONS
--------------
In addition to the serious questions raised by the "Weitzel"
letter and the Ellsworth AFB hoax, there also exist fundamental
discrepancies between information provided by "Falcon" and the
"facts" contained in the so-called Eisenhower briefing paper.
The Briefing Document (Enclosure I) was purportedly written by
alleged MJ-12 member Admiral Roscoe Hillenkoetter, in November
1952, for presentation to then President Elect Dwight D.
Eisenhower. Among other things, it states that two UFOs had
crashed, one in July 1947, near Roswell, New Mexico; the other
in December 1950, on the Texas-Mexico border.
Linda Howe states, however, that when Sgt. Doty invited her to
his office at Kirtland AFB OSI, in April 1983, he provided her
with information that contradicts this version of events. Howe
states that Doty confirmed the existence of a secret government
group called MJ-12 and then opened a desk drawer and produced
a document entitled "Briefing Paper for the President for the
President of the United States". (*Not* the Eisenhower document).
Howe states that she was allowed to look through the alleged
"Briefing Paper" but told not to take notes. She states that a
part of the document was a catalog of crashed UFO cases,
including one near Aztec, New Mexico in 1948 (or '49).
Now, if the *Eisenhower* briefing paper is genuine and was
indeed presented to Ike in November 1952, why was no mention
of the Aztec crash contained in it? Is it plausible that the
soon-to-be president would be let in on a secret of paramount
importance --that of alien visitation-- but not be given this
important information? Why would he be told about two UFO
crashes but not about a third? Why would the Aztec crash, if
it did occur, be any less significant than the other two
cases mentioned in the briefing paper?
In short, if the briefing paper that Sgt. Doty showed to
Linda Howe was genuine, what does that say about the accuracy
(and authenticity) of the Eisenhower document? If, on the
other hand the former was bogus and was meant to mislead
Howe for some reason, what does that say about Richard "Falcon"
Doty's reliability as a source for MJ-12 material as a whole?
At the risk of being redundant, may I again point out that
Linda Howe has sworn out an affidavit indicating a willingness
to testify under penalty of perjury, as to the truthfulness of
her statement relating to her meeting with "Falcon" at Kirtland
OSI.
About Robert "Bob" Collins, I know very little. I have
established at the time of his departure from the U.S. Air
Force, he was assigned to the Plasma Physics group at Sandia
National Laboratory located at Kirtland AFB. Linda Howe
states that in November 1987, Collins was "frantically" trying
to get her to meet with him in Albuquerque. At that meeting,
also attended by John Lear, Collins showed the two some MJ-12
documents, primarily relating to a live alien allegedly held
captive by the U.S. Government. According to Howe, Collins
stated that he had worked "behind the scenes" with Bill Moore
for years.
MOORE QUESTIONS
---------------
So, how does Mr. Moore fit into the MJ-12 jigsaw puzzle? On
the face of it, he appears to be just a UFO researcher who has
been approached by questionable government sources. I have
information, however, that raises doubts about his public image
as merely a "civilian" researcher. Indeed, it appears as if he
may be working (or have worked) for one of the U.S. intelligence
agencies. I base this statement on the following information:
In December 1985, I read an article by Barry Greenwood about an
allegedly ultra-secret government group called "MJ-12". The
article was based on information provided by researcher Lee
Graham. In March 1986, I met with Mr. Graham at his home, in
the hope that he would elaborate on the information contained
in Greenwood's article. I found Graham to be open, honest, and
sincere. While I do not agree with many of his conclusions
regarding MJ-12, I know that he is definitely not the "kook" or
"space cadet" that some have branded him. On the contrary, his
statements to me that evening were logical and down-to-earth.
I simply disagree with some of his premises.
As we talked, Lee provided me with copies of some of the
"documents" that have come to be associated with the MJ-12
affair, including the "Project Snowbird" paper and the
"Project Aquarius" TWX. When I asked who had given him the
documents, he would only say that the person worked for the
government, as an intelligence operative or information
conduit.
Over the next fifteen months I called Graham several times,
to ask whether there had been any developments regarding the
MJ-12 material. Perhaps the most noteworthy event during that
period was the visit to Graham by two agents from the Defense
Investigative Services (DIS). The agents were apparently sent
to find out why Graham, who holds a "Q" security clearance,
was in possession of alleged secret government documents that
had not been properly declassified.
In early June, 1987, I called Lee again. This was shortly
before Bill Moore's press conference in Burbank, during which
he intended to unveil the "Eisenhower briefing paper" and other
MJ-12 material. During this call, without any prompting from
me, Graham revealed that the person who had given him the
documents was in fact Bill Moore. I was puzzled. Graham had
previously said, on several occasions, that he had gotten the
documents from an individual who worked for the U.S. Government,
presumably in an intelligence capacity. As far as I knew, Bill
Moore did not work for the government in *any* capacity.
I asked Graham to explain this discrepancy. He unhesitatingly
replied that when Moore first approached him with the documents
he (Moore) showed him some kind of government ID card, with Bill
Moore's picture on it but an alias typed beneath it. According
to Graham, Moore indicated that he was working for the U.S.
Government for the purpose of releasing sensitive UFO-related
documents to the public.
I began to take notes. So incredulous was I about all of this
that I asked Lee to repeat his statements, which he did. I then
asked him which agency Moore claimed to work for. He responded
that Bill Moore's ID badge was identical to the badge shown him
by the two DIS agents. When I was skeptically retorted, "You
mean to tell me that Moore's badge looked like the DIS badges?",
he replied, "No, it was identical to them."
Graham went on to state that Moore claimed that he (Moore) had
been "flagged" in U.S. intelligence agencies' computer files so
that other operatives would not stumble over and inadvertently
expose his operations. Lee went on to say that he had once been
introduced to Moore's "superior" whom Moore would only identify
as "Richard".
At the conclusion of this rather baffling phone conversation
with Graham, I specifically asked him whether there was anything
that we had discussed that I should not repeat. He answered,
"No", and indicated that he would send me materials relating to
his investigation by the DIS, Bill Moore's first approach to
him, and other, related matters. A week later, I received the
items that Graham had promised and found that references to
Moore, by name, had been censored by Lee. By this time,
however, I had already spoken to Barry Greenwood, Peter Gersten,
Bob Todd, and others about the details of Moore's approach to
Graham. Apparently word got back to Moore about these
conversations because I later heard that he had vehemently
denied that he was a government operative and claimed that he
was only playing a "joke" on a gullible Lee Graham. The
"government ID", according to Moore, was a laminated MUFON card.
Enclosure J is a letter, dated May 8, 1986, that Graham sent
to the DIS in which he discusses Moore's first approach to him.
Graham mentions that when he was interviewed by the two DIS
agents, he told them about Moore and his ID card. Graham then
goes on to ask why Moore had not been interrogated about his
possession of allegedly secret government documents, copies of
which he had given to Graham. (One might also ask why Moore had
not been questioned about his impersonating a government agent,
if in fact his ID card was bogus as he now claims.)
Enclosure K is a second letter from Graham to the DIS, dated
October 19, 1986, exactly seven months after Lee was interviewed
by the two DIS agents. In it, Graham again mentions that Moore
has not been interrogated by the DIS over this lengthy period.
He concludes that it is because Moore does indeed work for the
U.S. Government, just as he had been told by Moore himself.
Graham has a point. If Moore was only "joking" when he showed
Lee the bogus ID card (an ID that looked so authentic that
Graham calls it "identical") to a DIS badge) one would think
that Moore would have been questioned by the DIS about this
potentially serious matter. If Moore was impersonating a
government intelligence operative as he disseminated "documents",
then surely an intelligence agency would be interested in
pursuing the matter. And yet, according to Lee Graham, seven
months after he had told the DIS about Moore and his badge, no
one had apparently approached Moore about this incident. Why?
One might reasonably postulate that this apparent lack of
follow-up by the DIS suggests that Moore does (or did) work for
the U.S. Government, just as he claimed to Lee Graham. If this
turns out to be true, however, given the highly questionable
track record of one of Moore's chief sources, "Falcon", one
must ask whether information, or disinformation, that he has
been disseminating in this regard, one might also ask why did
Moore not immediately dis-associate himself from Richard Doty
once he had discoveredthat he had forged the Ellsworth AFB
document? Instead, Moore later presented Richard "Falcon"
Doty on national television as a reliable intelligence source
of information about UFOs. Why?
Another serious issue involving Bill Moore that needs to be
reviewed concerns the so-called "Project Aquarius" document
(Enclosure L). This paper contains the first reference to
"MJ-12" to be widely circulated within the ufological community.
On the face of it, the Project Aquarius document is a teletype
message, sent by AFOSI Headquarters to Kirtland AFB OSI, dealing
with analyses of UFO photographs and films taken by Dr. Paul
Bennewitz. However, AFOSI HQ denies that it sent the message
and calls it a forgery. It now appears that, in this case,
AFOSI is telling the truth.
In a letter to attorney Peter Gersten, dated April 4, 1983,
D. Hall states that Bill Moore privately admitted that it was
*he* who did a "cut and paste job" and then "retyped" the
document (Enclosure M). If this is true, why would Moore do
such a thing? If a genuine message was sent to Kirtland AFB
OSI, dealing with Bennewitz' photos, MJ-12, and the rest, why
didn't Moore disseminate it in its original form? Wouldn't
the "retyped" version of if, if discovered to be such, raise
doubts about the credibility of the information contained in
it?
If Moore did "retype" the document, can he now produce the
original to substantiate the accuracy of the information
contained in "his" version? If so, it will be interesting to
see whether the "original" document will be confirmed as
authentic by AFOSI Headquarters.
I should point out that I possess additional information about
the Project Aquarius document that I intend to withold until
Moore has produced (or failed to produce) the "original".
A RESPONSE TO BILL MOORE'S OPEN LETTER
--------------------------------------
Just as I was concluding this missive, I received a copy of
Bill Moore's open letter to those who would question his
activities. In response to his criticisms and pleas, I would
like to make the following points:
First, Moore states that he is not a "forger", a "hoaxer", a
"fabricator", or a "counterfeiter". Whether he is any of
those things, I will leave to others to decide. I would ask,
however, if he could suggest an appropriate word to describe
his actions when he did a cut/paste/retype job on the Aquarius
document? If Moore believed that he was "the only one on the
right track", as Doty flattered him, then that's his problem.
If, however, he has engaged in the altering of government
documents before releasing them to an unsuspecting public,
then that becomes a problem for all of us. The credibility
of *any* document, even when released via the Freedom of
Information Act, will come into question in the minds of many
once it has been learned that a "leading ufologist" has
tampered with this or that document. And yet, Moore has the
absolute nerve to rail against those who would question his
"methods".
Second, Moore feigns self-righteous indignation when he denies
that he is "some sort of government agent". But clearly, he
has only himself to blame for this "rumor". *If* the ID badge
that he showed Lee Graham was fake, and *if* he was lying when
he claimed to be an intelligence operative, does he now have
any right to bemoan the fact that his escapade has finally
come to light? I, for one, do not believe for an instant
Moore's laminated MUFON card story. That explanation smacks
of the ridiculous "red herring" about there being *two* Dotys
that Moore offered up when the "Falcon"/Doty connection was
first suggested publicly by Barry Greenwood in 1987. While
I am sure that there are *plenty* of Richard Dotys in this
world, only *one* is the MJ-12 source "Falcon".
Third, Moore calls efforts by researchers to learn the identity
of his MJ-12 sources "inappropriate" and states that for
"obvious reasons" his response to these inquiries will be
"no comment". This posture, of course, also conveniently
shields from scrutiny the fact that his "primary" source for
the MJ-12 material, Richard Doty, has apparently acknowledged
forging the Ellsworth AFB document -- a fact that Moore himself
knew *at least* as early as March, 1988. In view of this
revelation, the attempt by Moore to project the appearance
that he is merely protecting a confidential government
source rings hollow. Indeed, it seems likely that his desire
to avoid embarrassment and well-deserved recriminations is
a chief motive for his "no comment" stance.
SUMMARY
-------
So, what does the MJ-12 affair add up to? I agree with Bill
Moore it would be premature at this time to draw conclusions.
It would not, however, be premature to carefully consider the
following facts:
1) A handful of "documents" have mysteriously surfaced
relating to an allegedly ultra-secret UFO policy group,
code-name "MJ-12". No government agency will confirm the
papers' authenticity and the National Archives has noted
several discrepancies about one of them, the so-called
"Cutler memo" (Enclosures N and O).
2) Another of the documents, the "Project Aquarius" message,
has been discovered to be fake, in the sense that it has been
altered by Bill Moore before being released to the public.
As I write, there is no publicly available evidence that the
original document Moore "retyped" was itself authentic.
3) The primary source for orally-transmitted MJ-12 material,
code-name "Falcon", has been determined to be Richard C. Doty.
According to Dr. Bruce Maccabee, Bill Moore has acknowledged
that Doty confessed to forging the Ellsworth AFB document.
Further, Doty's typewriter at Kirtland AFB OSI has been
implicated in the "Weitzel" hoax, and he has provided infor-
mation to Linda Howe that contradicts the "facts" contained
in the Eisenhower briefing paper.
4) The primary researcher involved in the MJ-12 affair, Bill
Moore, has, by his own account, faked a government ID card and
passed himself off as an intelligence operative to at least
one individual for a period of over two years. Whether Moore
showed Lee Graham a laminated MUFON card, as he now claims,
or a genuine government badge, of some type remains open to
question.
At the beginning of this letter, I asked whether the actions
of those involved with the MJ-12 affair tended to suggest a
genuine release of authentic UFO-related information to the
public or, on the other hand, a disinformation campaign ( or
for that matter, a simple hoax). I hope that those who are
truly committed to finding the answer to this question will
now renew their efforts. Hard questions must be put to Moore.
Evasive answers and self-serving pronouncements from him
should no longer be tolerated. I trust that those who have
acted in good faith, including Jamie Shandera and Stanton
Friedman, will be among his toughest questioners.
I may reached at:
6200 Eubank Boulevard NE
Apt. 833
Albuquerque, NM 87111
(505) 291-9335
signed: R. Hastings
cc:
Walt Andrus
Robert Bletchman
Larry Bryant
Paul Cerny
Marge Christensen
Jerry Clark
T. Scott Crain
Tom Deuley
Ann Druffel
Larry Fawcett
Raymond Fowler
Stanton Friedman
Peter Gersten
Timothy Good
Lee Graham
Barry Greenwood
Loren Gross
Richard Haines
Richard Hall
Budd Hopkins
Linda Howe
David Jacobs
Ben Jamison
John Lear
Bruce Maccabee
Bill Moore
Jim Moseley
Ted Phillips
Robert Pratt
Jenny Randles
Mark Rodeghier
Jamie Shandera
Brad Sparks
Dennis Stacy
William Steinman
Whitley Strieber
Len Stringfield
Michael Swords
Bob Todd
Ron Westrum
Fred Whiting
Jo Ann Williamson
Todd Zechel
3/18/89
MEMORANDUM
Robert Hastings
TO: The addressees of my recent letter on the MJ-12 Affair
RE: A clarification
In my recent open letter I mistakenly referred to Lee
Graham's security clearance as type "Q". Mr. Graham
has asked that I send out a clarification on this point.
I regret the error.
Mr. Graham has also expressed the opinion that I "mis-
represented some of the things" that he communicated to me.
I have reviewed the portion of my letter that deals with
Mr. Graham's statements to me, and I consider my account
of them to be fair and accurate. While I am certain that
neither he nor I could re-construct, word for word, our
conversations after this lapse of time, I nevertheless
stand by my portrayal of our talks.
As I have already indicated, I consider Mr. Graham to be
an honest and sincere individual. I accept the fact that
his recollection of our communications may differ from
mine on some points.
signed: Robert Hastings


58
textfiles.com/ufo/hidufo.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
UFO Update
Anonymous low-level informants have for years accused the U.S.
government of hiding crashed UFOs. Since these sources are of
uncertain reliability, the reports have been largely ignored.
Now, however, ufologists must consider the testimony of Robert
Sarbacher, whose entry in WHO'S WHO consists of more than 3
inches of tiny print, including education at Princeton and
Harvard and a stint as dean of the graduate school of the Georgia
Institute of Technology. In the years after WWII, the story
goes, Sarbacher served as a science consultant for the Defense
Department's Joint Research and Development Board. He was in
his Washington office on September 15, 1950, it seems, when he
received a visit from Canadian electrical engineer Wilbert B.
Smith. According to information released by Smith just recently,
it was then that Sarbacher revealed the existence of crashed
UFOs, apparently under investigation by Vannevar Bush, the
government's top scientist.
In a recent interview, Sarbacher, now head of the Washington
Institute of Technology, confirmed those remarks. He says
that during his period of government service as one of a
number of government scientists who served largely as
volunteers, he was told that the vehicles were composed of an
"extremely light and very tough" material, apparently intended
to withstand tremendous acceleration and deceleration. At one
point, Sarbacher says, he was even invited to a meeting at
Wright Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio, where officials
related their findings to scientists connected with the Research
and Development Board. Sarbacher had other commitments and did
not attend the meeting, but he says that those who did, including
Bush and noted mathematician John von Neumann, were told that the
vehicles appeared to be spaceships from another solar system.
Asked about his reaction to the episode, Sarbacher seems oddly
blase. He admits he hasn't given much thought to a matter most
people would consider extraordinary -- he considers it simply a
curious event in the course of a long scientific career. "After
all," he says, "I had -- and have -- a great many more pressing
scientific responsibilities. I wish I could refer you to someone
who was more directly involved than I was," he adds.
"Unfortunately, they're all long gone."
Writer William Moore, who has been chasing government UFO secrets
for years, considers Sarbacher's testimony significant. "It's
the first time someone with a reputation has come forward to
state publicly that the Pentagon has a recovered UFO," he says.
"This isn't proof, of course, but it fits in with information we
have from other sources." Informed of these claims, Temple
University history professor David M. Jacobs, author of THE
UFO CONTROVERSY IN AMERICA, admits Sarbacher's credentials are
impressive but observes, "Until somebody can produce an actual
crashed saucer, this is hearsay evidence. And how can he talk
so casually about something that would have to be the most
sensational event in all of history?"

556
textfiles.com/ufo/hoaglandlet.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,556 @@
======================================================================
FILE ORIGINATES FROM: <<UFONET I>>
UPLOADED BY: Tom Mickus
DATE OF UPLOAD: DEC/27/1989
======================================================================
======================================================================
HOAGLAND.LET [ ***] Marsface author writes Pravda -DEC/89
======================================================================
======================================================================
NOTE: The file is reproduced verbatim, except for use of "(sic)".
Words fully capitalized represent use of boldface in letter.
Accompanying "attachments" referred to in the following
letter, are not reproduced here.
=======================================================================
=======================================================================
Richard C. Hoagland
Old Gate Farm
Rt 4 Box 168
Wytheville, VA 24382
(703) 228-5524
December 1, 1989
Olga Dmitrieva
% Komsomolskaya Pravda
Street 24
6th Floor
Moscow, USSR
Dear Olga,
It was great to talk with you again the other morning (even
though th only time I could finally get a circuit between the United
States and Moscow was about 4:30 _AM_ -- when my body kept insisting
it was still "night!"). From the sound of your voice and our brief
conversation, including our exchange last Spring at Peggy Carters',
I know if we lived closer -- at least on the same continent -- we'd
have many things to talk about -- especially now, in view of what is
taking place around the world.
Attached is my "Op-Ed piece" on our Mars Investigation -- and
what I now believe is the "fingerprint" of its dramatic, real-world
impact on the current history taking place before our eyes. I look
forward eagerly to your reaction.
I've thought a lot about what you were trying to describe that
night so many months ago, when you were telling us about the new,
important role for journalism in your country; it reminded me of the
feelings trhat I had, when I got my first major journalistic opportun-
ity "to make a difference." At the somewhat "tender" age of twenty-
three, I was suddenly, "miraculously," invited to join CBS News about
twenty years ago (see attached biographical sketch) -- "to help them
go to the Moon." [The actual invitation was to become a science adv-
isor, during the Apollo lunar missions, to Walter Cronkite (can you
believe?). At the time, Walter was known as "the most trusted man in
America," and indication of the esteem in which he was held, both by
the public and his journalistic colleagues].
The almost indescribable feelings that I had on that remarkable
occasion -- when I realized that my (at the time, _very_ meager!) sci-
ence journalistic skills were actually being sought by an almost legen-
dary world news organization, if not by its very dean of journalism (!),
to contribute even in a tiny way towards an unprecedented moment in the
history of all Humanity, the First Lunar Landing -- I've thought, many
times since our first meeting, must have been very similar to the
feelings you attempted to describe that night in North Carolina, in-
volving your own role these days in Moscow: being witness to -- if not
an active participant in -- History.
If I remember correctly, you said something like "we [journalists]
now feel like soldiers 'on the front lines.' We feel a great, almost
historic responsibility to may 'peristroyka' work!"
Because of the historic "moment" you are now experiencing, Olga
-- participating in the extraordinary rebirth of an entire nation,
literally grappling with the Future (as opposed to "just" reporting it)
-- I believe that you can share some of my own vicarious excitement,
as I watch from half-way around the world, and wonder. . . is it
_possible_ that, behind ALL the extraordinary, revolutionary changes
we are seeing. . . what we have discovered on the Viking photographs
is partially responsible. . . ?!
ANCIENT RUINS LYING ON A NEARBY PLANET, RUINS WHICH WILL CHANGE
THE COURSE OF HISTORY FOR EACH OF US. . . IF THEY AREN'T DOING SO
ALREADY?
When we first discussed the possibility of my writing something
for you regarding our research, I certainly could not have stated these
ideas with such apparent certainty. But, over the course of the summer,
several major breakthroughs have occurred -- on both the scientific
front, and on the "politics of verification." These have remarkably
verified our "intelligence hypothesis," and crystallized my thoughts
-- and the result is the "editorial" you have before you.
The dramatic political developments -- which have included a
_total_reversal_ of "policy" with regard to the "Cydonia artifacts"
by NASA, and in less that 6 months (correspondence attached to this
letter) -- occurred, after 13 years of dismissing the possibility as
"nonsense," almost as rapidly as the revolutionary changes your
government is now undergoing after 70 years, prompting me to ask:
what's really going on here?
In particular, when you and I first met, I had just returned
from Washington (April 19), and a face-to-face meeting with Congress-
man Robert A. Roe, head of the most powerful science committee in the
U.S. Congress. As you can see from the attached correspondence (just
follow the dates), after our meeting Roe asked me for a memo of re-
commendations. . . then he took a long time (over 6 months) doing
"something". . . followed by a sudden flurry of announcements to the
media and various constituents, affirming (directly opposite NASA's
previous "position") that "NASA does plan to take new images of the
'Monuments of Mars'. . ." The very day the article in the WALL STREET
JOURNAL, announcing this development, appeared, was the _same_day_
that Chairman Roe did an interview for radio (I have the tape) in
which he bluntly said, "I've seen the [Viking] pictures. . . and they
[the objects] don't appear natural. It would be stupid _not_ to look!"
This from the Chairman of a major Congressional Committee in
the U.S. Government!
As if this weren't enough, as I said, we also had a major
scientific breakthrough this summer in the Cydonia research: we
believe we've now actually _decoded_ the first part of a _mathematical_
_message_ represented by the exquisite, redundant geometry we had
previously discovered at Cydonia. How do we know? Because the
mathematics _predict_ certain geophysical events, at _specific_
latitudes on other planets in the solar system, and the Sun. . . and
when we look at the geodetic maps of these celestial bodies -- the
phenomena are there!
As I said many times in MONUMENTS: "Science is nothing, if it's
not prediction."
In mid-August we published a technical paper on these dramatic
findings -- including a series of _very_specific_ geophysical pre-
dictions regarding what our Voyager unmanned spacecraft would find at
Neptune (_before_ it got to Neptune!). Because of the short lead-time,
we published electronically in a world-wide computer-information system
called "Compuserv" (the managers of Compuserv have specifically told
me, incidentally, that they will give you _free_access_ from Moscow, if
you want to communicate "live" with our on-going Mars Mission Issues
conversation, where we are actively discussing the major issues that I
raise in my "guest editorial." Or, you can simply access a vast range
of information. We can discuss details of that fascinating possibility
later, if you're interested).
Anyway, two weeks after we had published our "message paper,"
Voyager flew by Neptune. . . and observed _exactly_ what our "Cydonia
equations" had predicted -- based on a set of mathematical geophysical
principles discovered where there should be nothing capable of giving
any valid predictions for events taking place on a planet in the distant
outer solar system!
The only logical conclusion you can come to from these data, is
that we indeed have successfully decoded a specific "message" intended
by someone -- whomever "built" Cydonia -- to lead whomever would
discover "the Cydonia artifacts" to these _specific_geophysical_
_phenomena_. Why? Because they are clues to how planets really "work"
-- including our own Earth. And finding that out is essential to
_preserving_ any planet, if not possibly much more (we're working on
additional possibilities right now).
So you put these remarkable developments together, and you wind
up asking: "Are we the _only_ smart guys on this planet, to have
finally figured it out -- if only the beginning?!
And the answer is: "Of course not."
Your next question might be: "If these facts were also known
to members of the Government, particularly, since one key member --
a Chairman of a major Congressional Committee -- has now publicly
admitted "they _don't_ appear natural. . .") -- HOW WOULD THE GOV-
ERNMENT BE ACTING?"
And, if you had, in fact (as I report in the editorial),
briefed high-level members of both governments -- the U.S. and the
U.S.S.R. -- and one of them subsequently had a brilliantly-equipped,
working spacecraft actually in orbit around Mars for several months
. . . before it mysteriously "quit," your next logical question would
_have_to_be_:
DID THAT SPACECRAFT ACTUALLY _FIND_ SOMETHING. . . SOMETHING
WHICH COMPLETELY VERIFIES OUR VIKING INFORMATION, IF NOT RADICALLY
_EXTENDS_ IT. . . ?
But then you'd have to ask: "If that were true, if Mr. Gorbachev
is truly holding absolute proof (from Phobos 2) of the most phenomenal
discovery in history -- HOW WOULD HE BE ACTING?
My conclusions -- if not some of the significant evidence which
has led to these conclusions (the computer-enhanced Viking photographs,
along with my official documents and letters) -- you now have before
you my "editorial."
* * *
Olga, after a lot of soul-searching and weighing of our evidence,
I think the confirmation that the Human Race Is Not Alone -- as Mr.
Reagan _repeatedly_ has provided us the clues (see "editorial") -- is
the _only_ thing "big enough" to have suddenly , almost overnight,
forced the radical events we have been witnessing. And I think pro-
viding the crucial, hard evidence of that New Reality, to a series of
major leaders at the top of key governments (including now, the Pope!)
-- both within and without the so-called "Communist world" -- is the
reason Mr. Gorbachev remains so confident that the major "restructuring"
he's planning for your country -- if not the world -- is actually going
to succeed.
Because, if I am right, this discovery represents an extra-
ordinary New Beginning for Humanity. And Mr. Gorbachev, more now than
any other leader (since Ronald Reagan's Presidency ended), seems to
realize the power of that concept for creating needed Change. Just
compare television images of him and Mr. Bush. . .
Olga, I know this sounds bizarre. It would have appeared that
way to me, if anyone had seriously proposed this even a few months ago.
But the Mars data is inviolable, and the terrestrial clues are there --
including a series of truly curious events I _didn't_ detail in the
editorial, for simple lack of space. These events include:
* * *
A September meeting, against the backdrop of developments
sweeping out of Moscow and across all Eastern Europe, between ex-CIA
and ex-KGB agents, held in the United States -- ostensibly, to discuss
"possible interagency cooperation on international terrorism." One
key participant -- Mr. William Colby, former Director of the CIA --
as he was being interviewed on the ABC network program, NIGHTLINE,
along with Lt. General Fjodor Sherbak, former First Deputy Director
of the KGB, suddenly introduced into the conversation (for a total of
_five_ occasions in the last four years) former President Reagan's
curious scenario. Colby:
"President Reagan said to Mr. Gorbachev one time, that if
hostile MARTIANS [sic] landed on the Earth, we would be together
against them. . . (emphasis added)."
* * *
In the context of what we have discovered on the Viking images,
and against Roe's own comments that "they don't appear natural," isn't
that just a little _too_ coincidental. . . ? What REALLY was occurring
at that meeting? And remember, Mr. Gorbachev used to be the equivalent
of Deputy Director of the KGB. . .
Or, take the following, truly bizarre sequence of events:
* * *
Within days of this strange repetition of Reagan's curious
"alien threat" -- and from a former head of the U.S. intelligence
community no less -- came a bizarre, real-life "extraterrestrial
invasion story," appearing on the official TASS wires. The "report"
originated out of Voronezh, a city of about 800,000 people south of
Moscow. The correspondent, writing from Voronezh, seriously des-
cribed a "landing" in a city park by a "glowing alien vehicle"; a
"stroll around the park" by its giant humanoid inhabitants; and
even the temporary "disappearance" of one of the severely frightened
witnesses through the action of some kind of "ray of light," wielded
by the "aliens." The witnesses consisted of both children and adults,
reportedly including one high-ranking police official from the city,
Lt. Sergei A. Matveyev.
In early October, President Gorbachev visited East Germany,
to celebrate the 40th Anniversary of the German Democratic Republic.
He then returned to Moscow, amid reports that Eric Honecker had
issued live ammunition and crackdown orders, against increasing
demonstrations for democracy across East Germany.
Then, suddenly, the preceding official TASS report, on an
"alien invasion of a Soviet City," appeared on official Soviet
television, in the official Party newspaper, SOVIETSKAYA KULTURA,
and throughout the West -- including in THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE
WASHINGTON POST, and on our evening network television. . .
THE SAME DAY -- OCTOBER 9 -- THAT ERIC HONECKER WAS SUDDENLY
REPLACED BY EGAN KRENZ, AS HEAD OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE GDR.
Then, a few days after returning from his own quick trip to
Moscow, Egan Krenz, after instituing additional sweeping changes in
the entire GDR government and Party structure, announced dramatically
that the Berlin Wall "is obsolete" -- and three million East Germans
flocked to West Berlin across one deliriously happy weekend, as we
all watched in disbelief. . .
Mr. Reagan's "human family," at least in Eastern Europe, was
taking shape with staggering rapidity and, eerily, precisely as Mr.
Reagan had himself, repeatedly, "predicted" -- this time, literally
against the backdrop of an officially-reported "alien invasion" of
the Soviet Union. . .
What the hell was REALLY going on. . . a "public reminder" --
to a new, unenthusiastic Bush Administration in the West, and to a
resisting Party structure in the GDR -- "to get with the Reagan-
Gorbachev program" . . . or else Gorbachev would prematurely reveal
the evidence (from Phobos 2) of REAL aliens (which is the _last_ thing
this American government wants)?
Is that why Bush (and Baker) are so obviously _unenthusiastic_
about the upcoming Malta meetings? Because now, it's clearly "Gorby's
game?" I (and a lot of other Western observers, who have remarked
about it repeatedly in all our media the past few weeks) have seen
men going to their own _hangings_ -- who've looked happier!
* * *
Olga, as hard as this evidence, and as fantastic as my inter-
pretation of the effects it is creating, might seem -- are the "real"
events any less fantastic? And do the "it's all driven by the des-
perate Soviet economics" explanations really "fit?"
If it weren't for our now indisputable imaging and mathematical
evidence, and the repeated statements of a former President of the
United States (not to mention Chairman Roe's own statements and actions
on behalf of our findings), I would say "yes." But the contrary
evidence is there, and almost overwhelming; something of this magnitude
-- unprecedented in all human history, therefore, CALLING FOR AN UN-
PRECEDENTED HUMAN RESPONSE -- _must_ be behind the staggering events
that are occurring. It is the only thing which could be "bigger" than
"history as usual," creating a need for unprecedented actions.
If this analysis is true, the _real_ facts and decisions that
are being made are being hidden from us. These _must_ be made public,
I believe -- and publicly debated. Otherwise -- as I end the editorial
-- "glasnost" and "self-determination" are merely hollow phrases, being
parroted by leaders who are _all_ treating us like children -- which
has been precisely the problem for too much of human history!
I'll bet you didn't expect this, when you invited me to do a
piece for you on our research! But, ask yourself: if the Viking
evidence we have painstakingly assembled (some of which you now
possess) is truly what we think, what would we be seeing as its
effect upon the world -- given, that the leadership decided NOT to
tell us. . . yet. . . until we were somehow properly "prepared" to
handle it?! And what would that "preparation" look like?
You now know what I believe.
* * *
As I was finishing the final draft of what I have submitted,
I realized that what we had originally discussed -- a presentation
of our "ET evidence," followed by a discussion of how it will affect
"the average Soviet citizen" -- was just not possible within a single
editorial; events have progressed too far and too rapidly: if this
hypothesis is accurate, both the "average Soviet citizen" and the
"average American citizen" are being deeply affected _at_this_very_
_moment_, as are the "average citizens" of the GDR, Czechoslovakia,
Hungary, Poland, etc. -- if not the rest of humanity on Earth. These
effects are not going to occur in some hypothetical and distant
"future"; they are happening _right_now_ -- only , without the proper
background information, no one knows how to interpret these events.
Therefore, a good deal of the piece contains the crucial "background."
But, Olga, I still feel that readers need a further amplif-
ication of the immense consequences flowing from this now rapidly-
advancing, unprecedented situation.
For instance, that one extraordinary, almost immediate effect
-- with staggering, immediate consequences for everyone on Earth --
has been the visible, rapid retreat of the likelihood of nuclear
annihilation. Even our Defense Secretary, Richard Cheny (sic), has
turned (in less than _two_weeks_,) from a vigilant "hawk," who was
then giving speeches arguing that we "could not rest our national
security on the future of one man, Mr. Gorbachev," into someone now
agressively promoting the need for about 180 billion dollars worth
of U.S. defense _cuts_ -- over the next three years -- regardless of
whether President Gorbachev is still around! Clearly, Cheny feels
there has been some kind of _fundamental_ change in the Soviet
Union. . . or in the larger situation embracing _both_ the super-
powers on this planet.
The immediate4 _economic_ effect of this new attitude is
also making itself felt, not only in the United States but also in
your country: a so-called "peace-dividend," the monies that here-
tofore have been lavished on these huge, super-expensive arms-
stockpiles and high-tech weapons systems -- an almost uncountable
number of conventional weapons, nuclear warheads, intercontinental
missiles, planes, bombers, battleships, etc. -- is being rapidly
"earmarked" for diversion into "productive," peaceful industries;
I understand there are, even now, former rocket factories in the
U.S.S.R. which have already been "converted" -- and are, in part,
making bicycles!
Olga, because of the necessity of providing proper background
to this whole extraordinary sequence of developments, I was only
able -- in a line! -- to touch upon this immediate economic "dividend"
of finding out the Human Race Is Not Alone. But there is more --
_much_ more.
So, here is my additional proposal:
If you like what I have given you, and decide to run it, I
would like to expand upon the "effects" of these developments in a
"Part II." Since the economic impact of what is taking place is of
crucial importance to both of our respective cultures, the process
of "conversion" of 40 years of weapons industries to productive
output should be of major interest to your readers -- particularly,
if it is directly coupled (as it _will_ be) to the exploration of
what we've found on Mars.
For years, we have been discussing in the United States --
both inside and outside of NASA -- the potentially awesome terrestrial
economic effects of establishing "space industries" in orbit, to ex-
ploit the unique resources and enviroments of outer space. But with
massive weapons budgets and other constraints upon our federal budget,
there have been no "extra" monies to pay for such developments. Your
country, with its "MIR" space station and its various "materials
experiments" conducted during the long "stay-time" in zero-gravity by
cosmonauts in orbit, has developed far more experiences than we have
in exploring the kinds of materials that one can uniquely make in
orbit -- then send down to Earth. But even your space program has
been limited in applying this developing technology, by the massive
resources that have been going to the military, and by one other real
constraint -- the current, prohibitively expensive necessity of taking
_all_ materials, to be processed, into space from Earth. The costs
of lifting those resources _into_ space for processing, with present,
primitive rockets, is simply "killing."
All that dramatically can change -- if we pursue its exploration
properly -- because of what we have discovered at Cydonia.
What I would like to cover in "Part II" is the stunning
economic prospects for mining the _Martian_moons_ for these critical
resources, and the resulting industrial renaissance these abundant,
unique materials could stimulate on Earth -- with all the resulting
economic "fall-out" of new industries, new jobs, new markets, and new
consumer goods. Many economic studies, carried out both in the
United States and in the Soviet Union, indicate that with current
space technology (such as our space shuttle) IT IS CHEAPER TO GO TO
THE MARTIAN MOONS AND RETURN, THAN TO SEND MEN AND WOMEN OT THE
SURFACE OF OUR OWN MOON! (One of our own MARS MISSION associates,
Dr. Brian O'Leary, mentioned in the editorial, is an extensively
published pioneer in many of these studies.)
The fact that the Soviet Phobos mission was directed at
intensive study of the composition of the _moons_ of Mars, before
its enigmatic "failure," is demonstration of the Soviet perception
of eventual economic importance of these objects. _If_ we have
indeed discovered a former extraterrestrial civilization once
resident within the Martian system, the political and social impetus
to exploring fully its potential -- if adequately publicized --
could easily create an economic renaissance which could dramatically
affect the economies of both our countries -- particularly, if we
_jointly_ agree to explore the Martian "ruins," and similarly, to
_jointly_ develop the technologies to exploit the moons of Mars.
The result could be a swift, almost painless, economic
transition -- for those major industries in both our countries
which currently employ millions of workers in the production of
weapons of destruction -- rockets, warheads, advanced electronic
avionics, and all the other high-tech gadgetry used in making war.
These same skills and technologies, employed through such a "Mars
conversion program," could usher in a literal New Age for everyone
on Earth.
But of course, if I am right, the greatest benefit of all will
be in the dramatic new perspective that these discoveries will give
to every person living on this planet. There is almost a "spiritual
dimension" to discovering this truth -- that Humanity is NOT alone
before the Universe. This, I believe, is why those Orthodox Russian
priests were invited into the Phobos 2 Control Center. . . and why
Mr. Gorbachev met with Pope John-Paul this morning just prior to
his first face-to-face meeting with the current American President;
invoking the spiritual leaders on this planet in helping us to
"break the news" will be _essential_ to successful "preparation"
of the planet for the truth.
Well, that's it for now. I eagerly look forward to hearing
from you regarding all of this. I know it's a LOT to take in all
at once. But, just look at your television screen this weekend. . .
Does any other explanation really fit?
Enjoy. . .
P.S. I had another thought. If you agree that this should now
be publicly debated -- and in both our countries -- I would suggest
you might propose to the American television network news program,
NIGHTLINE, that they do a _joint_ program on this information with
your television program, in Moscow. You could contact Terry Irving,
the NIGHTLINE producer Ted Koppel assigned some months ago to
research our story; we've met with Irving in Washington at the ABC
News Bureau for several hours, now, and have provided him with all
the images and analyses -- including now a copy of my "editorial".
=============================== END OF FILE =================================
=============================================================================
= Directory Listing of <<UFONET>> Computer Bulletin Board Systems =
=============================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<<UFONET #>> Board Name System Data Phone Baud
Net/Node Location Operator Remarks Hours
=============================================================================
<<UFONET I>> THE CRUCIBLE Tom 416-237-1204 12/96 HST
(1:250/440) Toronto, ON Mickus Canadian Hub 24 Hrs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<<UFONET V>> Nexus Linda 602-526-8025 3/96 HST
(1:304/1) Flagstaff, AZ Murphy American Hub 24 Hrs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<<UFONET VI>> LATTICE~ Rod 405-277-3603 3/96 HST
(1:147/66) Luther, OK Wilson 14.4 HST 24 Hrs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<<UFONET VII>> Astro-Net David 714-662-2294 3/24
(1:103/903) Costa Mesa, CA Rice 24 Hrs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<<UFONET IX>> Radio Free Milwaukee Pete 414-351-1823 3/96 HST
(1:154/414) River Hills, WI Porro Multi-line 24 Hrs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<<UFONET XII>> Studio PC Ralph 813-862-8850 3/96
(1:377/2) Port Richey, FL LoBianco 24 Hrs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<<UFONET XIII>> The Briefcase BBS Mike 316-652-9202 3/24
(1:291/3) Wichita, KS Holcomb 24 Hrs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<<UFONET XIV>> Adventures Unlimited Ray 303-493-8162 3/24
(1:306/15) Ft. Collins, CO Randolph 24 Hrs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<<UFONET XV>> BXT-1761 David 512-298-1761 3/24
(1:136/402) Del Rio, TX Winters 24 Hrs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<<UFONET XVI>> The Arts Rap Bob 716-223-7874 3/24
(1:260/234) Rochester, NY Branch 24 Hrs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
=============================================================================
= IF YOU HAVE ANY UFO RELATED INFORMATION THAT YOU WOULD LIKE US TO SEE =
= OR HAVE DISTRIBUTED, YOU CAN NOW SEND IT VIA OUR NEW UFONET FAX LINE. =
=============================================================================
= ------>>> UFONET FAX HOTLINE - 24 Hrs - (414) 351-2075 <<<------ =
=============================================================================


307
textfiles.com/ufo/hoax.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,307 @@
There has been some recent discussion on ParaNet regarding the Philadelphia
Experiment and the Montauk Project. I am convinced that this whole thing is a
hoax based upon some very good research by Jacques Vallee and others. However,
despite the research showing that it is a hoax, the story continues to be
discussed as if it were all true. Jacques Vallee has provided this article to
ParaNet for electronic distribution only via the computer networks, including
Odyssey Network and Fidonet UFO.
ANATOMY OF A HOAX:
The Philadelphia Experiment Fifty Years Later
c Copyright 1993, 1994 by Jacques F. Vallee
1550 California Street, No.6L
San Francisco, CA.94109
Note: This article was first printed in the Journal of Scientific
Exploration, Vol.8 no.1 (1994) pp.47-71.
Distributed on Internet with author's permission. Abstracts of
all JSE articles can now be accessed on the net at:
http://valley.interact.nl/av/KIOSK/SSE/JSE_home.html
Abstract
The "Philadelphia Experiment" concerns the allegedly paranormal
disappearance of a Navy destroyer from the docks of the
Philadelphia Navy yard in the late Summer of 1943, followed by
disclosures of official contact with extraterrestrial powers.
Claims made by purported witnesses of this supposedly secret Navy
test directed by Albert Einstein have been repeatedly found to be
fraudulent. The author has now interviewed a man who served on a
companion ship to the destroyer in question, and who was on the
scene the night of its supposed disappearance, which he is able
to explain in minute detail. Yet the features of the story are
such that it survives in the UFO literature and that it is now
being revived under a novel form for the benefit of a new
generation of readers. Using this incident as a model of a
successful hoax, the present article extracts thirteen parameters
that have been instrumental in its remarkable survival over the
last fifty years; it compares the features of this fabrication to
other questionable episodes of UFO lore; finally, it attempts to
draw up a list of suitable measures for their detection,
challenge and ultimate exposure.
The Prevalence of Hoaxes
One of the remarkable features of the study of the paranormal
is the permanence and pernicious influence of hoaxes. Not only do
spurious stories arise, as they would in any other field, but
they are eagerly seized upon with little effort at initial
verification, even by people who have an established reputation
as objective researchers. Frank criticism of the process
inevitably arises, but it is commonly mistaken for an attack upon
the integrity or the intelligence of the advocates of the case
who naturally feel defensive and harden their position. Those who
continue to question the "evidence" tend to be assimilated with
skeptics and their objections are often misrepresented.
The media contribute to giving such stories an aura of
respectability, to such an extent that tall tales come to
represent the only "knowledge" of the paranormal the public will
eventually cite in everyday conversation.
Even more remarkable is the fact that some hoaxes tend to
acquire a life of their own, and continue to be invested with
believability among the public even when overwhelming negative
data eventually create unanimous agreement among specialists
about their lack of substance. This makes the work of the
researcher vastly complicated, not only because the field becomes
heavily tainted by the unreliability of these stories, but
because one has to spend an inordinate amount of time explaining
the situation to outsiders and dispelling prior misconceptions.
From a sociological point of view, however, hoaxes are quite
interesting. They provide rich insights into the preconceptions
of both believers and skeptics. They illuminate the motivations
of the authors of the plot and the eagerness of the spectators.
For any hoax to succeed it has to be believable and relevant.
Those that endure, resisting even the absolute proof, the
definitive exposure of the culprits and their methods, are
endowed with additional qualities. They resonate with deep-seated
imagery in the minds of the masses and of the educated public.
They never fail to generate high ratings on prime time. They
touch all of us, whether or not we like to admit it. Their
victims are as likely to be found among the highly educated, even
the scientifically trained, as they are among the masses. In the
words of Norman Mailer, "if lying is an art, then fine lying is a
fine art." (Mailer, 1991)
Proven or suspected hoaxes abound in contemporary ufology. The
saga of UMMO in Spain provides an example of a story which is
simply too good and whose implications appear too profound for
believers to be swayed by rational arguments. Even absolute proof
of trickery can always be superseded with the notion that a truly
superior alien civilization might well plant fake photographs or
false prophecies in order to test the faith of its followers on
earth, an argument actually volunteered by the self-described
Aliens themselves in some UMMO documents (Vallee, 1991).
Sociologists have long observed that exposure, in such cases, may
even serve to strengthen the core of a belief system, no matter
how outrageous, although it does tend to scatter away the outer
layer of sympathizers (Festinger, 1956).
In this regard, paranormal hoaxes are no different than their
religious or political counterparts. Exposure of the Protocols of
the Sages of Sion, a fabrication that began as a fake document
concocted by the dreaded Russian Okhrana in 1905 and was
successfully picked up and reframed against the Jews by Nazi
propaganda in the Thirties with terrifying efficacy (Cohn, 1967),
has not permanently dulled its impact. Indeed the Protocols have
now reappeared as "channeled" material from space entities, thus
endowed with that glow of supreme authority that many New Age
believers find harder to question than a "mere" historical
document, and absolving the human medium from any unnecessary
burden of guilt (Ecker, 1992). If specific incentive to study the
structure of hoaxes was necessary, this horrible example from
recent history should be enough motivation for us to work hard at
studying and exposing hoaxes in our own field.
The present article focuses on a particularly resilient
fabrication that exhibits all the important features of a
successful ufological hoax, enabling us to analyze it in detail.
As we proceed with this study we will attempt to point out the
possible parallels among various UFO stories or rumors exhibiting
similar characteristics.
Mention UFOs casually in any cocktail conversation, and
people are likely to bring up a number of "actual cases" they
have heard discuss on television shows such as Sightings or
Unsolved Mysteries. The alleged UFO crash at Roswell, the MJ-12
documents (which purport to emanate from an American Government
agency that knows all about the nature and purpose of UFOs and
their alien occupants) and various sensational abduction
reports will probably be mentioned. Then, almost as an
afterthought, someone may ask, "wasn't there a secret Navy test
in the Forties, in which a whole destroyer actually disappeared?"
Others may volunteer that Einstein had something to do with it,
and that many serious researchers believed the incident to be the
key to the nature of UFOs. You will be confronted once again with
the tall tale of the Philadelphia Experiment.
The story, of which we have just celebrated the fiftieth
birthday, is a good example of a hoax about which everything has
become known, thanks to many years of diligent research by people
who were first fascinated by the tale and gradually grew
skeptical of its extraordinary claims. Its impact on the public
over the fifty years that have elapsed since the initial incident
has been significant: one hardcover book signed by widely-read
author Charles Berlitz and veteran paranormal investigator
William L. Moore has become the standard reference (Berlitz and
Moore, 1979). It is "dedicated to the outriders of science whose
quest for knowledge takes them to the most distant stars and to
the innermost worlds." A feature movie directed by Stewart
Raffill was released in 1984, starring Michael Pare in the role
of a vanishing sailor. The dramatic nature of the story was
enhanced by its impact on several early UFO researchers,
including Morris K. Jessup. It was given an aura of further
credibility by the obvious interest shown by the Office of Naval
Research in the initial stages and by the secrecy surrounding it.
Official secrecy, which often results from purely bureaucratic
procedures, tends to be taken by advocates as evidence of
coverup, making wild speculation seem legitimate. Contributing to
the mystery was the enigmatic personality of the man who claimed
to be the main witness and a direct link to space intelligences,
Carl M. Allen alias Carlos Allende.
Conclusions
Few tasks are as important in the field of paranormal
investigation as the detection and elimination of hoaxes.
An area of research that does not police itself is eventually
policed by others with utterly devastating consequences, as
recent examples of fraud in academic research have shown. Popular
ufology, which thrives on rumors, poorly-investigated reports,
shoddy scholarship and outright fraud to the detriment of those
genuine facts that are potentially relevant to science, provides
a long history of colorful hoaxes that have come to define the
field in the mind of the general public and have tainted it with
a negative image in the view of scientists and educated laymen.
The problem with hoaxes is that they are charming, tantalizing,
entertaining, and often correspond to what we would like to be
true, as opposed to what is actually true. We have seen that the
Philadelphia Experiment had all of these characteristics. This
hoax, which should have died a long time ago under the combined
efforts of several researchers, is an example of a story that
simply refuses to die. It is surrounded with such an aura of
mystery that it continues to be successfully exploited. Like some
of those exhausted gold mines in the hills of Colorado which were
drained of every ounce of metal in the nineteenth century, yet
revive periodically in the offering circulars of unscrupulous
underwriters as penny-stock mining companies with new fancy
names, certain UFO stories always find gullible new investors.
Even in 1993 the tale of the disappearance of the DE173 has lost
none of its peculiar charm.
Hoaxes have been defined as "deliberately concocted untruths
made to masquerade as fact" (MacDougall 1958). In a recent
theoretical article on hoaxes, Marcello Truzzi notes that "there
has been little deductive effort in social science specifically
to describe or explain hoaxes." (Truzzi, 1993). He points out
that according to Curtis MacDougall a hoax's success is the
result of two sets of psychological forces acting within the
victim: under the rubric "why we don't disbelieve" MacDougall
lists ignorance, superstition, suggestion, prestige. Under
"incentives to believe" he lists financial gain, vanity,
chauvinism, prejudice, pet theories, the thirst for thrills, and
cultural climate. We have seen that such factors were indeed at
work in the infrastructure of the present story.
MacDougall also remarked: "When a hoax achieves the longevity
to qualify for classification as either myth or legend, hope of
stopping it almost may be abandoned." After fifty years we may
well have reached that point in the matter of the Philadelphia
Experiment.
Acknowledgments
The author wishes to thank Mr.Edward Dudgeon for his invaluable
help in clarifying the happenings in Philadelphia. The
willingness of VAdm. William D.Houser to review the manuscript of
this article is deeply appreciated. Among numerous correspondents
who have also supplied precious assistance in tracking down
various parts of the story we must acknowledge William Banks,
Gary Edwards, Allen Hovey, M.Troy, Heidi Streetman, David
Edwards, Marshall Philyaw and Keith Sjosten.
References
Allende, Carlos (1967): Letters to the author, personal
communication.
Berlitz, Charles and Moore, William L. (1979): The Philadelphia
Experiment: Project Invisibility. New York: Grosset & Dunlap
1979.
Clark, Jerome (1968) The Invisible Visitors from Outer Space,
in Steiger, Brad and Whritenour, Joan (1968): The Allende
Letters. New York: Award Special, n.d., pp. XX-XX)
Cohn, Norman (1967): Histoire d'un Mythe: La "Conspiration"
Juive et les Protocoles des Sages de Sion. Paris: Gallimard.
French translation by Leon Poliakov of Warrant for Genocide.
Dudgeon, Edward (1992): Letter of 29 November 1992. Private
communication to the author.
Ecker, Don (1992): Hatonn's World: a neo-Nazi E.T.? UFO
Magazine Vol.7, No.4, pp.30-31, July-August.
Festinger, Leon, Riecker, H.W. and Schachter, S. (1956): When
Prophecy Fails: A social and psychological study of a modern
group that predicted the destruction of the world. University of
Minnesota Press.
Goerman, Robert A. (1980): Alias Carlos Allende. FATE Magazine
33, No.10, October.
Hauser, Robert (1987): letter to the author, 27 March.
Klimo, Jon (1993): UFOs: Billy Meier and the Pleiadian Contact.
IRIDIS Vol.31 No.10, p.2, June. Berkeley: California Society for
Psychical Study.
MacDougall, Curtis D. (1958): Hoaxes. New York: Dover. (First
published in 1940)
Mailer, Norman (1991): Harlot's Ghost. New York: Random House.
Petit, Jean-Pierre (1991): Enqute sur des Extraterrestres qui
sont dj parmi nous: Le Myst
re des Ummites. Paris: Albin
Michel.
Pothier, Joseph (1993): The Philadelphia Experiment Revisited.
Electric Spacecraft Journal Jul/Aug/Sep.92, issue 7, published 28
January 1993, pp.15-25. Asheville, NC: Electric Spacecraft
Journal.
Raytheon Corporation (1980): A new electronic shield gives
invisible protection to the Fleet. Full-page advertisement
published in Barron's, October 6, p.3.
Rim Institute (1993): Catalog of Events, pp.14-15. Phoenix,
Arizona: The Rim Institute.
Steiger, Brad and Sherry, and Bielek, Alfred (1990): The
Philadelphia Experiment and other UFO Conspiracies. New
Brunswick, NJ: Inner Light Publications.
Truzzi, Marcello (1993): The Sociology and Psychology of
Hoaxes. In Gordon Stein, Encyclopedia of Hoaxes. Detroit, MI:
Gale Research, pp.291-297.
Vallee, Jacques F. (1991): Revelations: Alien Contact and Human
Deception. New York: Ballantine.
Velasco, Jean-Jacques (1990): Report on the analysis of
anomalous physical traces: the 1981 Trans-en -Provence UFO case.
JSE 4,1, pp.27-48.
END
PARANET FILENAME: HOAX.TXT

51
textfiles.com/ufo/hoax.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
07-Apr-87 11:35 MST
Sb: APmn 04/07 UFO Prankster
LAKE CITY, Minn. (AP) -- A man says he, and not outer-space visitors,
flattened two circles in a cornfield as part of a prank to make people think
that unidentified flying objects had landed there.
The confession by David Olson, 44, a chemist with an Eagan engineering
company, comes nearly eight years after he flattened the circles in his nephew's
cornfield as a practical joke on his nephew, Curtis Olson, in September 1979.
The joke quickly ballooned out of proportion into a probe by authorities and
a UFO center investigator.
"I thought my brother, Bruce, would ask me if I was responsible and I'd admit
it," David Olson, of Morristown, said Monday. "But the first I heard of it was
on television and then it was too late.
"It developed so fast and people were so intense about it, I thought I'd
better shut up. I thought they might be so angry around there, they'd string me
up."
The idea of the prank came to Olson in the summer of 1979 when people were
talking about flying saucers at a family get-together. Olson said his nephew
seemed strongly convinced of their existence.
His nephew farmed a few miles southwest of Lake City at the time and Olson
decided to pay a visit to the cornfield to set up a fake UFO landing.
"A good practical joke depends on patience and thoroughness." David Olson
said. "But I never realized it would be as much work as it was."
He drove his pickup truck to his nephew's cornfield about 11 p.m., then
lugged a posthole tamper and a butane torch into the field.
"I brought the tamper to simulate what would have been landing gear setting
down and I spent a lot of time on that," Olson recalled.
He said he took special care to tamp in about seven areas to make the landing
gear impressions appear symmetrical.
"I started stepping corn down and making progressively bigger circles," he
recalled. "I used about two of the one-quart butane canisters to singe the corn
on the ground and some of the standing corn surrounding the circle. That would
have simulated a blast of energy."
After his nephew spotted the flattened corn, the Wabasha County sheriff, a
county agriculture extension agent and an investigator for the Center for UFO
Studies of Evanston, Ill., descended on the farm.
Although Olson has confessed, his nephew flatly rejects the confession.
Curtis Olson, who now lives in Montana, said Monday he agrees with
investigators who say something unexplainable happened in September 1979 in that
cornfield.
"Listen, I know he is capable of pranks," the nephew said. "But we had
experts out there who said it couldn't have been a prank. They concluded that
something came down with tremendous force. He could have been out there a week
and not do what they found."
Copyright 1987 by the Associated Press. All rights reserved.


60
textfiles.com/ufo/hoosiers.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
Date: 30-Mar-87 23:35 MST
From: Executive News Svc. [76374,303]
Subj: APin 03/30 Hoosier UFOs
CORYDON, Ind. (AP) -- A national organization that investigates unidentified
flying objects is checking into some strange lights that have been popping up in
southern Indiana in recent weeks.
The UFOs, described as glowing and blinking lights, reportedly appeared
almost nightly for more than two weeks near Mickey Shawler's house.
James Delehanty, a field operative for the Mutual UFO Network, spent two
nights last week in the Harrison County community, investigating the reports. He
and other observers saw several airplanes pass over, but nothing resembling the
lights that had been reported.
Ms. Shawler said the lights did appear last Thursday night, but not until
around midnight, after the observers left.
"It's so frustrating," she said. "It's almost like they didn't want to come
with all the people around."
But the lights have been seen by enough credible witnesses to generate an
investigation by Delehanty's network, a 4,000-member international organization
based in Texas.
The group was asked to check out the Corydon reports by the National UFO
Reporting Center in Seattle.
Robert Gribble, a spokesman for the center, said his agency is a
clearinghouse for UFO information in North America and uses the Mutual UFO
Network as its investigative arm.
Ms. Shawler said she first saw the lights several months ago. The lights also
have been reported by policemen and journalists.
Witnesses have reported seeing as many as six lights or objects at one time.
They are described as blinking lights in the sky or glowing orange balls. Ms.
Shawler and at least one other witness have reported that the phenomena have
followed their cars.
"Everybody says, `Mickey, you're crazy,"' Ms. Shawler said. "But once they
see them, they don't say that anymore."
Jackie Carpenter of the Corydon Democrat was one of the skeptics until she
saw the lights two weeks ago.
Ms. Carpenter said the lights "hovered, rose, lowered, went sideways,
disappeared and came back."
"It was really weird," she added.
Delehanty, a traffic manger with the Kentucky Air National Guard, said he
plans to continue his investigation. He said other reports of glowing orange
lights have also come in recently from the Indianapolis area and from Spencer,
near Bloomington.
Delehanty said the Corydon sightings were initially classified as "nocturnal
lights," but may be upgraded to "close encounter I" ranking.
Classifications for sightings are:
--Nocturnal lights: unexplained lights in the sky at night that do not have a
fixed movement and are more than 500 yards away.
--Daylight disks: unexplained objects more than 500 yards away and seen
during daylight.
--Radar visuals: any unexplained sighting on radar.
--Close encounter I: unexplained lights or objects within 300 yards.
--Close encounter II: a sighting that leaves physical evidence, such as
broken tree limbs or scorched grass.
--Close encounter III: physical contact with aliens.
--Close encounter IV: abduction by aliens.
Copyright 1987 by the Associated Press. All rights reserved.
liens.
--Close encounter IV: abduction by a

146
textfiles.com/ufo/hopreply.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
A REPLY TO PHILIP KLASS, YET AGAIN
by Budd Hopkins
There are two periodicals I normally avoid reading because of the
ossified mindsets they represent. Ironically, both are called _Inquirers_ -
one, with an "E," the _National_ and the other, with an "I," the _Skep-
ical_. The former seems to believe every UFO report it hears without both-
ring to investigate, and the latter seems to _disbelieve_ every UFO report
it hears, also without bothering to investigate. Or so it would appear if
one reads Philip Klass' review of the Kathie Davis UFO abduction case as
described in my book _Intruders_. Klass is apparently afraid actually to
deal with anyone face to face who may, like Kathie Davis, have reported
such an experience. Three months ago, at the MUFON conference in Washing-
on, DC, poor timid Phil - a self-described garden party skunk - wandered
around for the entire weekend. But not once, it seems, did he interview
any of the people there who publicly described the pain and trauma their
UFO abduction experiences had caused. And earlier, in the spring, when
Klass and I and two female abductees appeared together on the Oprah Win-
rey TV program, he again evaded the opportunity to interview them face to
face. The reason, of course, is obvious. In his mind he _knows_, without
investigation, that these otherwise credible people - doctors and lawyers
and housewives and pilots and police officers and all the others I've
worked with - are either lying or mentally disturbed; this because it is
Klass' _opinion_ that since UFOs do not exist, UFO abductions cannot oc-
ur! Face to face inquiries are therefore as unnecessary for believers like
this particular skeptical inquirer as they are for the _National Enquir-
er_, despite their differing ideologies. Unfortunately it is left to us
pragmatists in the middle actually to investigate these accounts for the
purpose of discovering if the witnesses are, in fact, lying, deranged or
simply telling the truth.
Klass' review of _Intruders_ begins with a confession. He admits to
having suffered an odd period of "missing time" while writing his piece.
Now Phil and I are both getting on in years, and I know the symptom. If he
nodded off while trying to write his review, I confess I had trouble stay-
ing awake while trying to read it; I forgive him and understand. But de-
spite his problems with drowsiness, Phil thinks his keen detective's nose
provides him with the ability to locate contradictions in a text. Nostrils
aquiver, he cites several in his review of _Intruders_. For example, after
many descriptions of the UFO occupants' skin tone as being in the gray,
grayish-white to white range, a color group significant because it is so
different from our normally warm human flesh tones, I "slip" and in his
opinion make a terrible blunder. He frantically blows his whistle, report-
ing that one witness says, "The skin is very thin...grayish..." while
another witness says, "The skin is white...so thin its see-through." He
regards this discrepancy as so devastating that he prints the words
"white" and "grayish" in italics! One can almost picture his self-
satisfied smile as he sits at his typewriter, Panama hat firmly in place
and "gotcha" in his heart.
On the important subject of hypnosis he feels he's located another
contradiction, so he cites an authority on the subject. Dr. Simon, the
psychiatrist in the Betty and Barney Hill case, is quoted as saying, "Hyp-
nosis is not a magic road to the truth." Phil is apparently so enamored of
this sentence that he italicizes the negative word. However, on page 209
of my book, I quote with approval the following verdict: "Hypnosis does
not automatically represent a path to certain truth." I'm not accusing our
skeptical inquirer of plagiarism. I'm willing to allow that somehow he
does see a contradiction between these sentences which resides, perhaps,
in the fact that in my version I left out the italics.
But these are mere quibbles with Klass' review of my book. This CSI
COP is trying for bigger game. He attempts to get away with a basic - and
outrageous - assertion, one that goes to the heart of my investigation. He
states that I accepted everything Kathie Davis said _without ever once try-
ing to check her veracity_! Now, Chapter 2 of _Intruders_ deals with one
central incident in the Kathie Davis account, the June 30, 1983 UFO land-
ing and its resulting ground traces. There I describe in what one reader
called "numbing detail" many of the avenues of inquiry I pursued to verify
her report, among them the soil analysis tests that were carried out on
the affected ground, the interviews I conducted with each of the Davis'
four closest neighbors, my interrogation of family members as well as the
two individuals Kathie was with the night of the incident. Elsewhere I
discuss the psychological investigations undertaken and the "lie detec-
tion" test to which Kathie voluntarily submitted - and passed. But Klass
has the gall to state that "because of the claim that he is a 'meticulous
investigator,' one might have expected that [Hopkins] would have tried to
verify at least one tale [Kathie] told that could be easily checked." I
will grant him the most generous explanation of this outrageous statement
and say that if he dozed off while writing his review it is not incon-
ceivable that he might also have slept through most of my book.
Each chapter belies his absurd assertion that I made no attempt to
verify any part of Kathie's account. In Chapter 5, for example, I discuss
another of Kathie's reports, one that involved five other people on a camp-
ing trip in Kentucky. During my visits to Indianapolis I was able to lo-
cate and interview four of these five witnesses to the incident; unfortun-
ately the fifth was critically ill at the time and has since died, so with
him, at least, my efforts were in vain. These interviews are reported in
precise detail. After driving all over Indianapolis to locate these people
and record their recollections, I think with justifiable anger of Klass'
remark: "One might have expected that [Hopkins] would have tried to verify
at least one tale she told...."
It would take many pages to deal with the misrepresentations and ap-
parently deliberate, strategic omissions in Klass' review. He implies, for
example, that I accept the word of witnesses without seeking objective,
scientific opinion - never mentioning the fact that Dr. John Burger, a
gynecologist-obstetrician at Perth Amboy General Hospital was asked to in-
terview the witnesses and examine their testimony, or that psychologist
Dr. Elizabeth Slater was asked to perform psychological tests upon the
abductees without being told that UFO experiences were involved. Meticu-
lous pains were taken to assure objectivity in these and other inquiries
in order finally to arrive at the truth. I state in my book that UFO abduc-
tees have suffered profoundly from their experiences, and I describe them
as victims. I label the UFO occupant's genetic experiments upon them as
being sometimes cruel, and state that "to some extent at least each is a
personal tragedy." No one reading _Intruders_ can mistake my attitude to-
wards these often horrifying experiences. And yet Klass, in his review,
says this: Hopkins has an "overwhelming desire to believe in an extra-
terrestrial genetic experiment." A despicable and wholly invented infer-
ence, suggesting that I take pleasure in these personal tragedies.
The final problem, however, is not Klass' penchant for off-the-wall
distortion. It is his basic - and ugly - explanation of the case. Kathie
Davis, he "suspects," is a liar, who made it all up. He cagily avoids the
term "liar" in order to soften the impact of his brutal judgement. She
doesn't exactly lie - she just enjoys, in his phrase, "spinning tall
tales." By making it all up, by allowing a book to be written about her
"invented" experiences and then by describing them publicly - by doing
these things Kathie Davis in Klass' view can be nothing but a liar on a
monumental scale. Kathie's "tales" under the circumstances are viciously
deceptive lies, designed to deceive hundreds of thousands of people. But
Klass is not finished with the Davis family. Kathy's mother also lies,
Klass implies. My visits to Indianapolis, he states, "could not help" but
impress the Davis family and their friends and neighbors. So impressed
were they, he theorizes, that "even Kathie's mother recalled that _she_
had had UFO encounters in her youth - some years before UFOs were first
'discovered.'" (Emphasis his) And there you have it. An "investigator" who
carefully stays far away from his subject, Kathie, while attending a con-
ference with her. An "inquirer" afraid to interview her, let alone to simp-
ly chat with her in an honest attempt to test his theory. Instead, in a
manly display of courage he avoids her and then from a distance calls her
a liar. Case solved. Investigation unnecessary. Work completed while sit-
ting at home, reassuring himself that his opinions about the UFO phenom-
enon render this innocent woman ipso facto a mendacious fraud who "enjoys"
deceiving others. And let's throw in her mother for good measure; surely
she's another liar, too. Philip Klass, unfortunately, has always been as
myopic as he has been brutal in his judgement of innocent fellow human
beings. The first behavior is harmless, the second, cruel, and I can only
hope that in time he will come to regret the pain he has caused to trauma-
tized men, women and children. May this "skeptical inquirer" finally learn
to inquire rather than merely hurl stones at the innocent.


270
textfiles.com/ufo/howe.thd Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,270 @@
Msg: #4763 Sec: 1 - UFOlogy
21-JAN-88 04:47 AM
Subj: "STRANGE HARVEST" etc... (R)
From: Tom Mickus
To: Linda Howe (X)
Welcome to ParaNet Linda. Could you perhaps give us an update on current
prevalence of "cattle mutilations". Have they really dropped off dramatically
since 1983? In regards to this whole subject generally, what books would you
recommend as being the most comphrehensive? Seeing that your documentary was
widely publicized, is it very difficult for Video shops to acquire it? And I
know this is kind of putting you on the spot, but what's your reaction to the
Lear.txt, especially his comments relating to the genetic deficiency the EBEs
are supposed to have? One last question, how prevalent was the cattle
mutilation thing here in Canada, in particular, Ontario? Thanks, I shall be
awaiting your response...
...Tom
Reply(s) #4786 #4787 #4829
(REply Quit ?) (D F): rr
Msg: #4786 Sec: 1 - UFOlogy
21-JAN-88 11:23 PM
Subj: #4763 - "STRANGE HARVEST" etc...
From: Linda Howe
To: Tom Mickus (X)
to Tom Mickus from Linda Howe About current status of animal mutilation
phenomena, I have written a softcover book entitled "Animal Mutilations: The
UFO Factor" available now with 26 photos, documents and map. It focuses on
recent cases, especially those involving UFOs. In answer to your second
question above, the mutilations did not taper off dramatically after l983.
There was intense activity iin South Dakota near Pine Bluff and Colorado and
several other parts of the United States. Tom Adams in Paris, Texas, also has
files containing newspaper articles about the l980's and previous years. He
is at P. O. Box l094, Paris Texas. He also publishes "Stigmata" and "Crux"
about animal mutilations and paranormal phenomena.
About the availability of my documentary "A STRANGE HARVEST," in the week of
January 25th I am editing a new hour version that will contain a 6 minute
update of new material. That video is available for purchase from me for
$47.50 including postage. Orders can be placed with a check or money order
made out to: Linda Moulton Howe and sent to A STRANGE HARVEST,3208 East
Fremont Drive, Littleton, Colorado 80l22, PH: 303-694-9749. I also have
available the complete transcript of the first broadcast version of A STRANGE
HARVEST, 77-minutes, with updates from l980 to l987 bound in soft cover for
$l8.00, including postage. There are several published and video variations I
have and for further information about videos and publications, please contact
me by letter at the East Fremont address.
<continued>
(REply Quit ?) (D F):
Msg: #4787 Sec: 1 - UFOlogy
21-JAN-88 11:55 PM
Subj: #4763 - "STRANGE HARVEST" etc...
From: Linda Howe
To: Tom Mickus (X)
<continued>
About Lear's material -- he has aggressively been accumulating information
from many sources since the summer. As is often the case in this hall of
mirrors with a quicksand floor (the UFO story), getting to any real hard rock
fact underneath the quicksand is difficult. Out of frustration, many people
are tempted to run with conclusions based on second guessing and
circumstantial connections. I sympathize with the frustration and energy
behind releases such as John's. But as I have said to him directly, jumping
to conclusions and inferences without hard proof, especially in public forums,
can be a disservice. After 7 years since producing A STRANGE HARVEST, the
only thing I can safely say is that there has been and is today deceit and
disinformation at many different levels, sometimes a single government agency
can be sending conflicting and contradictory messages simultaneously. And
from the abduction cases, it is also clear that the ET's themselves don't seem
to level with humans either. So, every piece of information that surfaces,
including John's paper, has a question mark around it?
Canada? Many mutilation reports there in British Columbia, Alberta.... after
A STRANGE HARVEST WAS BROADCAST IN L980, i GOT A CALL FROM Lynn Lauber, Royal
Canadian Mounted Police in Calgray. He wanted to screen A STRANGE HARVEST
because quite honestly in spite of the RCMP's public statements about being on
the trail of a cult killing the animals, the private fact was that they were
stymied like all the other law enforcement in this country and elsewhere.
Lauber screened HARVEST and maintained an exchange of photographic and other
- More (Y)/N/NS?
evidence with U.S. law enforcement. The most recent animal mutilation stories
surfaced in October l987 in Gunther, Alabama -- over 40- animals found slit
from th roat thru stomach, bloodless, and some internal organs removed. No
person or thing caught. In Wytheville, Va currently, much livestock reported
missing.
(REply Quit ?) (D F):
Msg: #4829 Sec: 1 - UFOlogy
23-JAN-88 02:15 AM
Subj: #4763 - "STRANGE HARVEST" etc...
From: Linda Howe
To: Tom Mickus
This is a follow up to my correspondence yesterday with Tom Mickus about John
Lear's text. John gathered that material from several sources who were all
getting a similar dark scenario concerning the gray ET motives. Since
September, several UFO investigators have received similar material from
confidential sources, so John has outlined some of what has surfaced and his
ideas about the material. It's important to keep in mind that John is not
alone in receiving such material and the fact that similar stories are coming
from different sources in the U. S. and abroad might be significant. However,
so far there still is no proof for any of it and I think it is helpful to keep
a mental distance on all the unproved material -- like watching a movie from
the back row in the balcony without becoming too involved in any particular
scene and sensing that the plot can still take some very unexpected turns.
(REply Quit ?) (D F):
Msg: #4767 Sec: 1 - UFOlogy
21-JAN-88 10:05 AM
Subj: MIBS (R)
From: Ralph Toscano
To: Linda Howe (X)
Hi Linda;
Nice to have you on ParaNet... I know this may be out of your area of
expertise, but do you know anything about the MIB cases?? Or how about the
EBE's that Mr. Lear spoke of?....Looking forward<72><64> to your Sorr<72><72>yߴ<79>
about the line noise....
Reply(s) #4788
(REply Quit ?) (D F): rr
Msg: #4788 Sec: 1 - UFOlogy
22-JAN-88 12:08 AM
Subj: #4767 - MIBS (R)
From: Linda Howe
To: Ralph Toscano (X)
To Ralph Toscano from Linda Howe ... First, MIB's. When I was investigating
the animal mutilation mystery in l979-l980 for A STRANGE HARVEST, there were
at least 3 different kinds of ETs associated with the mutilations: l) the
Grays, the short large black eyed type such as those so often reported and
drawn by abductees in Budd H opkins research and others. 2) Blonds, or
Nordic types -- taller, pale shoulder length hair and light eyes with pupils
bigger than human eyes but basically very similar in appearance to Northern
European humans. 3) Dark skinned, brown, Asiatic type with slanted eyes and
dark black hair that make strange high pitched language sounds. This is also
your MIB description in the UFO literature. Are the Asiatic types doing
several things at once including scaring UFO witnesses and mutilating animals?
Or are there several different types of ETs on the planet at the same time,
each with a different mission or motive? I don't know the answer. But I do
believe that human witnesses want to report exactly what they saw. Most
people in my experience are try ing very honestly to deal with the
inexplicable by trying to explain it. EBE -- this is a government acronym for
"extraterrestrial biological entity or entities". It is my understanding that
this acronym was used by our government; i.e. the MJ-l2 types from around
l947 on.
Reply(s) #4801
(REply Quit ?) (D F): rr
Msg: #4801 Sec: 1 - UFOlogy
22-JAN-88 06:51 AM
Subj: #4788 - MIBS (R)
From: Ralph Toscano
To: Linda Howe (X)
Linda;
If all three alien types are associated with the mutilations, then is it
safe to assume that each "race" has a parallel need for the parts that they
are so precisely removing?... I am also curious about government involvement
in these mutilations... Like Army testing of biological weapons on these
animals...Did you run into any resistance from the military or government
agencies while doing your research for Strange Harvest??
Regards -- Ralph
Reply(s) #4830
(REply Quit ?) (D F): rr
Msg: #4830 Sec: 1 - UFOlogy
23-JAN-88 02:27 AM
Subj: #4801 - MIBS
From: Linda Howe
To: Ralph Toscano
About the 3 different alien types related to the mutilations -- it has been
suggested that the particular blond type seen may have some direct connection
with the grays such as doing work for the grays without having the same needs
as the grays. Further, it has also been suggested that the MIB types have
some kind of alliance with the grays but not necessarily the same needs.
Thus, various ETs might be assisting each other but for different reasons and
different needs. About government involvement -- the Head of the animal
mutiliation investigation, Carl Whiteside, at the Colorado Bureau of
Investigations perhaps summed up that questiion the best: "Why would the CIA
or any other government agency go around mutilating cows or other animals out
on the range lands? If they wanted to test for something in those animals,
they could simply buy those animals and examine them in government facilities
without causing public awareness and fear." Contrary to usual military and
government secrecy about sensitive issues, the mutilated carcasses of animals
have oftenn been left in conditions of such high strangeness that it seems
clear that the mutilators want the animals to be found and wondered about.
(REply Quit ?) (D F):
Msg: #4811 Sec: 1 - UFOlogy
22-JAN-88 12:14 PM
Subj: Aussie Mutes (R)
From: Scott Savage
To: Linda Howe (X)
Linda,
With the opening of the UFO flap in Australia, I was wondering if you had
ever investigated any mutilation reports from "The Land Down Under." With
such sightings as are occurring now, it would seem that the mutilations might
be a direct link.
--Scott
Reply(s) #4813 #4831
(REply Quit ?) (D F): rr
Msg: #4813 Sec: 1 - UFOlogy
22-JAN-88 03:00 PM
Subj: #4811 - Aussie Mutes (R)
Msg: #4831 Sec: 1 - UFOlogy
23-JAN-88 02:33 AM
Subj: #4811 - Aussie Mutes (R)
From: Linda Howe
To: Scott Savage (X)
Yes, I made several inquiries about Australia when I was doing A STRANGE
HARVEST. There are a lot of cows there and I expected to hear a lot of
mutilation stories. But the opposite -- no mutilation reports in Australia.
However, there was an intriguing blurb in an English publication about a
documentary film done in l9ll called "The Haunted Bilabong" about the
mysterious deaths and mutilations of sheep iin the outback associated with
creatures from outer space. I tried for a couple of months to try to track
down such a film -- if it ever existed -- and wonder today if that magazine
blurb was more government disinformation? Or if such a film was actually made
in l9ll, who made it? If anyone out there in the Paranet syustem has ever
heard anything about such a film, I would greatly appreciate knowing.
Reply(s) #4834
(REply Quit ?) (D F): rr
Msg: #4834 Sec: 1 - UFOlogy
23-JAN-88 04:32 AM
Subj: #4831 - Aussie Mutes (R)
From: James Vincent
To: Linda Howe
1911? Hmmmm...the very emergence of film as a media itself. If this film did
exist, it is probably locked away in some film vault at one of the bigger
studios here, or in England. Do you know if it was a silent film? It seems
that, being so early, it probably was. I think maybe the best thing to do
would be to write all the major studios, asking of such a film. It is very
possible they may know of its whereabouts. I will scan my film books and see
if I can come up with anything. Also, what was the Englsh publication? Was it
recent? They may know how to get it.
-=James
Reply(s) #4835
(REply Quit ?) (D F): q


82
textfiles.com/ufo/humanguinea.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
From: anonymous@freezone.remailer
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Subject: Human Guinea Pigs Are as American as Apple Pie (fwd)
Date: 19 Mar 1995 23:07:29 -0000
Organization: Bull Worldwide Information Systems.
Lines: 73
Sender: daemon@cass.ma02.bull.com
Message-ID: <199503192306.AA15262@bolero.rahul.net>
Human Guinea Pigs Are as American as Apple Pie
By Samuel Chavkin
Author of "The Mind Stealers" (Boston, 1978)
Subjecting people to experiments, in most instances without knowledge of the
risks involved and without their consent, has been a continuing practice by
government agencies. A Jan. 5 news article discusses the difficulty the
Central Intelligence Agency is having finding records of the experiments.
However, at a Senate hearing on Aug. 3, 1977, Adm. Stansfield Turner, former
CIA director, disclosed that the agency had been conducting brainwashing
experiments on countless Americans - prisoners, mentally ill patients, cancer
patients, and even unwitting patrons at bars in New York, San Francisco and
other cities. Some were drugged with LSD and other psychotropic agents.
This was the cold war period, when the focus was on spying and counter-spying.
Thus, the main objective of this mammoth CIA effort, which cost the taxpayers
at least $25 million, was to program the experimental subject to do the
programmer's bidding, even if it would lead to the subject's destruction.
As you reported Aug. 2, 1977, a CIA memorandum of Jan. 25, 1952, asked "whether
it was possible to get control of an individual to the point where he will do
our bidding against his will and even against such fundamental laws of nature
as self-preservation."
Mind control and behavior modification experiments in this period also became
the underpinnings for a "medical" approach to stem the rise of social disquiet
following the murder of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Hundreds of
thousands of Dr. King's followers were out in the streets throughout the
United States demanding that their civil rights be recognized and that Dr.
King's assassins be brought to justice. Many protests led to violent
confrontations with the police.
Two physicians from Harvard, Dr. Frank E. Ervin, a neuropsychiatrist, and Dr.
Vernon H. Mark, a neurosurgeon, in a letter to the Journal of the American
Medical Association, proposed a surgical strategy to resolve such conflicts.
In their view, protesters who resisted police control were suffering from
"brain dysfunction," a condition, they said, that could be remedied by
psychosurgery.
They proposed implantation of very thin electrodes in the amygdala region of
the brain where "bad" brain cells, presumed to be associated with violent
behavior, would be burned out with an electrical charge.
Despite an angry outcry from many physicians who charged that this was in
effect a return to the discredited lobotomy operations used on shell-shocked
soldiers following World War II, law enforcement authorities welcomed the
approach. Especially impressed with psychosurgery was Ronald Reagan, then
Governor of California, who was ready to allocate $1 Million to set up a
"violence-reduction" center.
Without much further ado, psychosurgery got underway in the Vacaville
penitentiary in California: at Atmoree State Prison in Birmingham, Ala., where
50 such operations were performed, and in other prisons. The Veterans
Administration used psychosurgery in its hospitals in Durham, N.C.; Long
Beach, Calif., Minneapolis and Syracuse. As a result, many prisoner guinea
pigs entered into a semi-vegetable state of mine.
Psychosurgeries were finally halted when civil libertarians and the
Congressional Black Caucus denounced them as racist, since most of the prison
population was made up of Afro-Americans and other minorities.
- from a Letter to the Editor of the New York Times, Jan. 11, 1994
From the Omega Report -- July/August 1994
Published by the Phoenix Foundation
A non-profit Research Institute
P.O. Box 92008
Nashville, TN 37209

234
textfiles.com/ufo/hummute.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
The Human Mutilation Factor
by Don Ecker
In the last forty years of UFO research, one of the most baffling
questions that have plagued researchers has been "Is
the UFO Phenomenon dangerous to humanity?" Over the years, there
have been numerous cases where the phenomenon has figured into
human deaths, but as a rule, most cases have been officially
ruled accidental. When speaking of cases where death has
resulted, usually most assume cases where military pilots have
died as a result of "chasing" the phenomenon. One of the most
famous of these military chases that is discussed when ever the
subject of death and UFOs is raised, is the famous "Mantell
Case". This case is so well known that I will not discuss it
here, but there are many others. In one of the less well known
cases, during the mid 1950's, a military jet interceptor was
observed on radar being "absorbed" into a UFO over the Great
Lakes. No trace of pilot or aircraft was ever found. In another
case reported in the excellent work "Clear Intent" was the case
of the "Cuban MIG Incident". In this case a Cuban MIG was
locking on his weapons radar when the aircraft exploded in mid*air.
The wing man was certain that the UFO had fired some type
of weapon, but other than the jet exploding, no other smoke,
flame or other obvious weapon firing was observed.
The matter of either overt or covert hostility on the part of
UFOs has always been treated warily by serious researchers. On
the one hand, if the enigma is hostile, then several questions
must be faced. What if anything should the powers in authority
tell the public? Is the government capable of handling a threat
of this type? Is the public ready to face an issue as
potentially terrifying as a "possible threat from somewhere
else?" Other than incidents involving military involvement, have
there been cases where civilians have been injured or killed
during some type of UFO encounter? Is it possible that the
reported cases of UFOs and their occupants abducting unwilling
humans for some type of medical or genetic experimentation could
be true? Now, if any of this is factual, then what ramifications
do the Human Race face in light of the above?
According to Mr. Phil Imbrogno, during the research that led to
the writing of "NIGHT SIEGE The Hudson Valley UFO Sightings" by
Dr. J. Allen Hynek, Philip Imbrogno, and Bob Pratt, Imbrogno has
stated that on several occasions, Hynek specified that he wanted
no mention of the dozens of human abductions that they had
already uncovered at that time, to be mentioned in the book.
Hynek was afraid of the adverse publicity if word of this aspect
leaked out to the public. After Hyneks death, Imbrogno stated
publicly on Compuserve and other public forums, facts of
abductions, animal mutilations, and EVEN several cases of
mysterious deaths of humans, that he indicated COULD possibly
be linked to the UFO Phenomenon.
While researching several stories for UFO Magazine, I interviewed
a number of prominent UFOlogists, over the last several months,
and in each case, the question of human deaths, in connection
with animal mutilations, invariably was raised. Most readers of
this text will be familiar with Mr. John Keel, who many regard as
the last of the Great UFOlogists. From the earliest days of
modern UFOlogy, Keel has been a force to reckon with. The author
of numerous books that address various aspects of UFOlogy, and
magazine articles too numerous to mention, Keel has a unique
slant on the subject that most will never experience. According
to Keel, the phenomenon has always had an unexplained hostility
towards humans, that have led to untold numbers of deaths. While
Keel will be the first to explain that he rejects the ET
hypothesis, he does not doubt the phenomenon a bit. In what many
UFOlogists consider as one of Keels best works "The Mothman
Prophecies", E. P. Dutton & Co., Inc. 1975, Keel related report
after report of animal mutilations involving cattle, dogs, horses
and sheep, and also related what were called "vampire killings"
of four humans in Yugoslavia, were the victims were "mutilated
and drained of blood".
After having spoken to John Ford, the Chairman of the Long Island
UFO Network, for a news story for UFO Magazine, I became even
more convinced that the aspect of potential UFO hostility should
be investigated. Ford relayed a numbing number of animal
mutilations, human disappearances, human abductions, covert
Federal involvement in areas that suffered high numbers of animal
mutilations, and even armed military helicopters that chased UFOs
over civilian communities. Ford, who is a officer of the Federal
Court system, did investigations into the disappearances of
mostly young adults over a year period, in areas of high UFO
overflights, and after having several personal friends who were
police officers of the local municipalities look into the
situation, came to the conclusion that the facts were being
suppressed. The reason given was that there was "no need to
panic the public." Although no iron clad proof can be made for
direct UFO intervention, the circumstances are extremely suspect.
After growing up in an age where the entire human race can be
decimated by nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, the human
race somehow manages to keep slogging on. I have seen more
people "panicked" over a shortage of gasoline than imminent
nuclear holocaust, yet somehow when the subject of UFOs crop up,
the government doesn't want to panic anyone. It really makes me
wonder what they know, that I should. I really don't think that
they are going to talk to anyone soon, as you shall soon see.
In January, 1989, it came to the attention of the MUFON State
Director of Idaho, Mr. Don Mason, that cattle mutilations had
occurred once again in the southeastern section of Idaho. After
an investigation by a MUFON investigator, the facts were as
follows. The animals ( two cattle, same night, but each owned by
different ranchers ) were "somehow" killed, sexual organs removed,
body fluids drained, patches of hide "surgically"
removed. All the appearances of what is today considered to be a
classic case of animal mutilation. As of this date ( February
15, 1989 ) the final lab reports are not back yet, but already
the Sheriffs Department has labeled it a "cult killing." No
tracks, tire or human, around the animals even though it had
just rained, no unusual activity reported by the ranchers that
evening, and one animal was found next to an occupied house.
One of the ranchers admitted that this was the second time he had
been "hit" by the mysterious mutilators. The last incident had
only been a bit over a year previously, and they were worried
enough that all had their "deer rifle" within easy reach.
After having been personally involved in an investigation of
cattle mutilations as a police officer back in 1982, I was very
familiar with the "cult" theory of perpetrators. The Idaho
Department of Law Enforcement drags it out every time there is a
new rash of mutilations. The problem is, and every one is aware
of it, that no one has yet been brought to trial, or arrested yet
for these crimes. Out here in the west, people know that you are
flirting with a ranchers bullet if you are caught fooling around
with the ranchers cattle. They are his livelihood, and he will
defend it. Yet, the mutilations keep occurring, and no one is
any the wiser, or are they?
With the subject of animal mutilations fresh in everyones mind, I
was once again speaking to Don Mason, when he informed me that
the investigator that had been assigned to the above mentioned
case had come across a very mysterious death of a man back in
1979. According to the report, two hunters in the Bliss and
Jerome area of Idaho had literally stumbled across the nude body
of a man that had been hideously mutilated. The body was in the
literal middle of nowhere, nude except for a pair of underpants,
his sexual organs had been removed, his lips sliced off, and
several other classic mutilation cuts. Although he was in very
rugged country, his bare feet were not marked as if he had walked
in that terrain, but yet no other tracks, animal or human were
evident anywhere. After the police were notified, an intensive
search was mounted, and miles away, the mans possessions were
recovered, yet no one yet knows how the body ended up where it
was found, or even more importantly, what happened to him. It
should be noted that this area also had over the years, many
unexplained UFO reports and cattle mutilations.
Now I must explain that I had very mixed feelings about whether I
wished to attempt to explore this subject any further, or allow
sleeping dogs to lie. On the one hand, I wanted more than
anything to discover just what was occurring, and on the other, I
realized that this had the potential to backfire on someone that
disturbed the status quo. I was familiar with reports of human
abductions and mutilations that had surfaced in the last several
years in reports such as the Lear documents, Grudge 13 reports
and others, but yet I was not sure what I believed, or even if
there was anything to believe. I ran across a friend that was still
employed with a police department in this area who was a
detective. I had mentioned to him the recent cattle mutilations,
and what I suspected in the above mentioned case of a human that
had been mutilated. Scot had also been involved in the last
several years with several cases of mutilations that he had been
called upon to investigate, always with negative results. He was
as curious about this phenomenon as I was, and since he was still
an active duty police officer, he had access to the department
computer, to access the NCIC system that is maintained in
Washington D. C. by the FBI. After giving Scot the criteria for
a search of unexplained human deaths, that involved factors of
mutilation, I asked that the search go back to at least 1973,
involving this area of the Northwest. Scot ( not his real name )
ran the request through the department computer. As he mentioned
at the time, he had expected to get realms of reports back that
we would have to wade through, to get to the reports that would
be are further study. Scot ended up requesting that the inquiry be
run back to 1970, and involve not only Idaho, but also Utah,
Nevada, Oregon, and Washington states. Because of the magnitude
of this search, Scot stated that it would take about one week to
get the results back into his department. As a side note, for
anyone that is not familiar with the NCIC system, it is a
national data bank for Law enforcement agencies all across the
United States. It is maintained and controlled by the Federal
Burea of Investigation, at FBI headquarters, in Washington D. C.
On the 14th of February, Scot contacted me in person, and
appeared very troubled. His exact words were that "something is
really screwy, Don." "I got the request back from NCIC on
Monday, and there has gotta be something wrong. They told me
that they had NO unsolved murders at all, zero, that met that
criteria. THAT ANY FURTHER REQUESTS WILL HAVE TO BE MADE BY
VOICE, TELEPHONE CALL, WITH PROPER AUTHORIZATION. Somebody is
sitting on something, big as Hell." I also knew that something
was as screwy as hell. After all, anybody that has had any
dealing with law enforcement knows about the "Green River Killer"
in Washington state. This serial killer is credited with at
least 30 to 40 murders of young women, and to this date, the case
is as big a mystery as ever. Many of the killings showed some
types of mutilation, and if nothing else, at least some of these
homicides should have shown up.
Once more, as a side note, I had been warned by a prominent
UFOlogist, that there was a lid "screwed down tighter than you
would believe in regards to human mutes." I also was warned that
in order to break through the secrecy, was going to be a long and
sometimes weary job, but that if enough persistence was applied,
then it was possible to get to the bottom of this facet of the
UFO enigma. Do I think that this can be solved, along with the
rest of the puzzle? Yes, I do, because I think that the secrecy
can only be maintained for so long, and then no longer. I also
believe very strongly that only if the entire UFO community works
in concert will this be accomplished, and the infighting and arguments
MUST CEASE for the good of us all.
On the ParaNet system and on Compuserve, I wrote and uploaded a
file entitled LIGHT.TXT, and in UFO Magazine Vol. 3, No. 5 I
called for a UFO summit to be held in order to get the UFO
community organized and to present a unified front. Only by a
unified front, and calling for Congressional hearings, will this
lid ever get torn off, and the truth that is suppressed be
brought to the light of day. Any help from the members will be
greatly appreciated, and I can be reached at ParaNet RHO at the
following number: 1)208)338)9187.
Also I can be reached on Compuserve by EMail, and my user number
is: 74270,3360. Anyone with ANY INFORMATION is requested to
contact me at the above addresses as soon as possible. The
secrecy game has gone on long enough. It is past time to get to
the bottom of this. Forty years IS LONG ENOUGH.
Don Ecker


BIN
textfiles.com/ufo/hynek.ufo Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.

105
textfiles.com/ufo/hypnoltrast.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
A letter to the editor in the Summer 1988 issue of the
Skeptical Inquirer caught my eye. It referred to an article
called "The Aliens Among Us: Hypnotic Regression Revisited," by
Dr. Robert A. Baker. In it, Baker challenged UFO abductions by
coming up with several alternatives to the ET Hypothesis,
including Fantasy-Prone Personalities and Hypnogogic/Hypnopompic
Hallucinations. These last two are special dream states
experienced upon drifting off to sleep/waking up, in which one
can feel paralyzed and/or see things in their bedroom that
aren't really there. Out of Body Experiences and Alien
Abductions have been attributed to this phenomenon by some
research psychologists.
Since I received few responses to my post on the ASTRAL echo
suggesting Hypnogogic/pompic phenomena as a POSSIBLE explanation
for OOBEs, I thought perhaps this letter would be enlightening:
----------------------
I would like to thank Robert A. Baker for his article "The
Aliens Among Us: Hypnotic Regression Revisited" (SI, Winter
1987-88). I have been plagued by hypnogogic hallucinations since
childhood, but until reading this article I didn't know what
they were called or even that other people had them.
My typical hallucination goes something like this: I am on the
verge of falling asleep. A loud ringing in my ears, sometimes
accompanied by a montage of unearthly voices, signals the onset
of another episode. Though I seem awake, my body is completely
paralyzed. I feel my "spirit" leave my body. The next thing I
know I am floating somewhere near the ceiling, looking down at
myself and my wife at my side. Once free of my body, I can often
control where my ethereal self goes. Sometimes I float all
around the house, and on one occasion I floated through the wall
and out into the yard. Occaionally I sense the presence of other
beings around me. At some point I get bored or frightened by the
whole thing and return to my body and go to sleep.
Instead of an out-of-body experience, I sometimes have an
extremely vivid auditory and/or visual hallucination. Over the
years I have seen and talked to "ghosts," been visited (though
not yet abducted) by aliens, seen three-dimensional heads
floating by my bed, heard knocks on my door (when no one else
was in the house), and was once attacked by a glowing green
Doberman. These experiences seem as real as life.
I have never thought of these experiences as anything more than
what they certainly are: my mind playing tricks on itself. The
few other people I've known who have had similar experiences
were all convinced that they were, in Baker's words,
"incontrovertible proof of some sort of objective or consensual
reality." These otherwise rational and intelligent people also
believe that Uri Geller can really bend spoons with his mind.
Take one hypnogogic hallucination and one fantasy-prone
individual and you have all the ingredients you need for a true
believer.
Based on my own experience, I believe that hypnogogic and
hypnopompic hallucinations provide a rational explanation for
most alien abductions, out-of-body and near-death experiences,
ghosts and just about any other claim of the paranormal you care
to name. Baker states that these hallucinations are a "common yet
little publicized and rarely discussed phenomenon." I recommend
that SI and CSICOP discuss and publicize them thoroughly in the
future.
James A. Stewart
Coronado, CA
---------------
COMMENT:
Mind you, I don't think "H/HH"s can fully account for the
abduction syndrome, due to the striking similarities between
reports (see SNOBS.UFO, ParaNet Alpha, Library 1). But even in
this area I'm open to further inquiry.
I'm also not the least bit impressed with this so-called
"skeptic's" remark that OOBE's are "certainly" caused by H/HHs,
"based on [his] own experience." Isn't extrapolation from
personal experience an unsound method of judging data? It
certainly is when True Believers do it, as many declared
skeptics are quick to point out. If he's that "certain," there's
no use in even arguing with him. He's no longer a skeptic, he's
become a cynic.
However, I thought this letter was important, in that it
presents an alternative, Earth-bound picture of the phenomenon
from the point of view of one who has experienced it. Rarely do
declared skeptics acknowledge having actual encounters with the
bizarre; they choose instead to take a more detached approach. I
think this mixing of subjective experience with objective
evaluation is an important element in the Rationalism movement's
efforts to gain credibility among the credulous.
<<>>
Copyright 1988 National Fringe Sciences Information Service, All Rights
Reserved.
Letter Copyright 1988 Committee for the Scientific Investigation of
Claims of the Paranormal. Used with permission.


42
textfiles.com/ufo/idaho.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
Computers On-Line Presents: An Idaho Report
A report to MUFON concerning a report submitted by
Don C. Mason State Director Idaho, MUFON
At approximently 7:00 PM Mountion Standard Time, Mrs.
Barbara Trammell of Pocatello, Idaho stepped outside of
her home onto her patio. It was approx. one hour prior to
sunset, and although the sun was out, there were a few clouds
in the sky.
The city of Pocatello, and its airport sit to the east of
the witnesses house. Glancing at the sky, Mrs. Trammell
noticed what at first looked like a small aircraft flying
from the southwest toward the northeast. Mrs. Trammells
son, a privite pilot, often flys over her home, and she is
familar with his altitude and approx. speed when he is flying.
She stepped into her kitchen, and grabbed her 7 by 35 mm
binoculars, and stepped back outside to view the aircraft.
She noticed that there was something different about this
aircraft on this day of April 14th, 1988. She noticed that
Prthe aircraft did not have any wings, appeared round, was
a dark metallic color and traveling at about 150 to 200 MPH.
At the closest the object was in relation to the witness, it
passed directly over the subject at approx. 1000 feet. She
noticed that the round object had dipped downward without
slowing when overhead. Also, while observing the craft, she
noticed that it had what appeared to her to be "portholes"
in an uneven arrangement around the craft, and what appeared
to be a strip around the middle that was self luminescence.
Mrs. Trammell stated that she had the object in view for about
2 minutes, and no other aircraft were in sight. The outside
temp. was 60 degrees f. She also stated that she listened for
any sound, but the object was silent.
A check was made with the Pocatello Police Dept. and the Idaho
State Police, and the Pocatello Airport for any other reports
of this sighting. All were negative.


58
textfiles.com/ufo/implantrep.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
>>>This is a response to the text entitled, "INSIDE UFOLOGY" dated
January, 1989, downloaded from PARANET NODE ALPHA.<<<
The recent INSIDE UFOLOGY article presented the possibility
that a medical anomaly might be an "alien implant." The "implant" was
described as assuredly non-metallic (since an MRI did not "rip it right
out of her") and that its removal would be extremely dangerous, because
of its "proximity to the crucial nerve."
First of all--as pointed out--the M in MRI stands for
magnetic. The REAL truth is that MRI stands for Magnetic Resonance
Imaging. (Actually, it used to be called NMRI--Nuclear Magnetic
Resonance Imaging, but the Nuclear was dropped for fear that the public
would connote that with radiation.) An MRI works by magnetically
alligning the nuclei in each cell in a certain direction. This allows
images which are highly resolved, and tumors and anomalies are therefore
seen more readily. An MRI places NO magnetic pull on any molecule. If
this were true, an MRI would be contraindicated for any patient having
any type of medical implant--a simple amalgam filling, for example.
Second, the proximity of the "implant" to the crucial nerve
would not make its removal dangerous at all. Why not? Because there IS
no crucial nerve. In fact, if this particular patient does have a
"crucial" nerve, then I believe we definitely have an alien on our
hands. Not likely.
Why am I raising a fuss about these two seemily small points?
Because I feel that gross inaccuracies as these is the primary reason
few serious reporters and researchers take ufology seriously. This is
not likely to change, until ufology researchers become better versed in
the scientific method and the basic sciences. Science-fiction authors,
artists, and other dreamers are unlikely to help the cause of ufology by
proposing preposterous explanations of scientific observations. Contra,
they are VERY likely to hurt the cause, as they become the easy targets
of those who DO have the proper background and they can be easily
led and manipulated.
It is not my purpose, here, to detract from ufology or from
those who have a serious interest in ufology. Doubtless, most following
the recent developments are well-intentioned and sincere individuals.
However, for the good of the investigation, it is necessary to be able
to scientificaaly verify ALL theories and explanations if the truth is
ever to be learned.
Certainly, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck,
then in all probability, it's a duck. However, during the past year such a
myriad conflicting documents, theories, explanations and accusations
have been circulating, that I myself find it necessary to discount
almost everything. If Moore, Lear, Cooper, and the rest have ANY real
evidence, then let's see it. Either sh*t or get off the pot. All we
have so far is a quackless duck. The amusing question remains: where
(or, more appropriately, who) are the quacks?
Respectfully submitted,
Dr. Eric Andrews
71261,1555


112
textfiles.com/ufo/indian1.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
Jeff Walker #64 @7317
Thu Jul 11 23:57:31 1991
<20> Ask_UFO #127
Dt: 21-Apr-91 00:03
By: Don Ecker
To: All
Re: Incident at Indian Point
This file was provided to the ParaNet<sm> Information Service by
UFO Magazine. All rights are reserved. You may distribute this file
freely as long as this header remains intact.
Date prepared: 4/20/91
Contributed by: Staff UFO Magazine
=================================================================
Incident at Indian Point
by Vicki Cooper
The threat of UFOs compromising reactor security, as
if the nuclear industry didn't have enough to deal with
already, became a very real concern in 1984. Although of-
ficials won't admit it, several researchers have information That
New York 's Indian Point Reactor complex endured such
a UFO problem during the long siege of sightings that
happened throughout the state's Hudson Valley area.
The portrayal of the event in this article is based primarily on
the disclosures of unnamed sources.
The summer of 1984 was a troublesome season for
authorities at the Indian Point nuclear reactor complex in
Buchanan, New York. Two UFO appearances, one of which was verified
by Carl Patrick, director of nuclear information for the New York
Power Authority (NYPA), and later documented by the press and the
1987 book Night Siege, apparently put the normally tight security
of the plant to a severe test. The first event entailed the brief
flyover of a huge craft, witnessed by three security policemen on
June 14. That was followed ten days later by a UFO incident of
unprecedented impact. It was one of hundreds of UFO sightings in
the Hudson Valley, but one the nuclear workers won't soon forget.
"Here comes that UFO again! " an Indian Point security guard is
said to have yelled on the night of July 24, 1984, alerting other
security personnel by way of the plant's internal
communications system. A UFO, variously described as looking like
"an ice cream cone " and "boomerang, " had lazily drifted over
to Reactor #3-the only active reactor at the time-lingering about
300 feet above the domed construction for some ten minutes, sending
security officials into an uproar. Now, six years later, the
principal UFO researcher on the case admits that many aspects of
the event remain confusing and undisclosed. And although he's still
receiving information, Philip Imbrogno calls his own lengthy
investigation "stagnant."
"Every time new information comes up or I get a lead on
something, I get very reluctant to deal with it again," said
Imbrogno, who heads the science department at the Windward School
in White Plains, New York. "The entire case has caused me quite a
bit of pressure . . . The event would indicate that whatever
appeared over there, our state-of-the-art technology in defense was
unable to deal with it. " He suggests that from what his sources
have said, a military aspect came into play. The Indian Point UFO
represented an intolerable security breach.
Military customers?
Imbrogno says that it is precisely that aspect which has had a
lasting effect, and which has generated repercussions that continue
to this day. But according to the New York Power Authority, which
oversees the reactor complex, Indian Point itself has no direct
military customers. Reactor #3 primarily services local and state
facilities in New York City and Westchester County, including local
school districts, the New York City subway systems and some of New
York's trains. Most importantly, in Imbrogno's mind, are several
military installations in and around Duchess County, which
allegedly get their power from Indian Point. According to his
sources, these are primarily satellite receiving stations, and "a
number of other military operations of which we can only guess, "
Imbrogno says. The official agency overseeing the reactor complex
is the New York Power Authority, although Consolidated Edison has
jurisdiction over Reactor #2 and is sold use of #3 for extensive
transmissions to New York residential users and, perhaps, military
facilities such as Camp Smith, an Air National Guard base located
north of Peekskill. (Reactor #l is inactive.)
It was NYPA whose officials apparently spent considerable human
energy trying to dissuade Imbrogno from writing about the July 24
event, concerned he would release information vital to the plant's
security. "I think other agencies were using (the NYPA) to harass
me, " he said, noting that he was constantly subjected to their
repetitive phone calls, threatening that he would be forced to
appear at a hearing on the incident. (He was never subpoenaed, but
Imbrogno subsequently, and perhaps coincidentally, was audited by
the IRS four times.)
The compulsion to publish was undeniable; of what may have been
as many as 70 UFO witnesses among Indian Point personnel, a number
quietly sought out Imbrogno, and on the condition of anonymity
provided him with the vital facts which led to the production of
Night Siege (co-written with Bob Pratt and J. Allen Hynek.) "My
sources involve people who work in security for the plant and also
people in secretarial and janitorial positions," he said.
"The only problem is that getting anything on paper-
documentation, something official-is very, very hard, I have
unofficial confirmation right now that a number of documents
pertaining to the sighting do exist at the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission. " Normally, NRC records can be opened to the public
under terms of the Freedom of Information Act, but when he in-
quired, Imbrogno was informed that the documents were being held at
the reactor complex, and as such were protected under national
security regulations. "It's a joint sort of thing, " he said, "In
other words, although the NRC is pretty open to the public, if they
<<Continued Next Post>>


111
textfiles.com/ufo/indian2.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
Jeff Walker #64 @7317
Thu Jul 11 23:58:51 1991
<<Continued From Previous Post>>
want to keep a document classified, they'll store it with another
agency. I have an inside secretarial source who's actually seen the
documents filed." The NYPA's Patrick denies that any such
documentation exists, and dismisses the incident by claiming that
all Hudson Valley UFO sightings were later identified as light
aircraft, There was no videotape taken by on-site surveillance
cameras, Patrick insists, or audio recording of oral
communications, both pieces of evidence which Imbrogno strongly
feels do exist and are being retained somewhere. According to
Imbrogno's sources, a security shake-up ensued the very next day.
"A number of agencies came in, including the NRC and military
personnel, and they supposedly cleaned out everything. You have to
remember that with nuclear reactors, you're only going to get 10
percent of the real story. They're overly terrified of bad
publicity, and are really afraid of the anti-nuclear groups, which
can cause trouble. Anything that happens is immediately covered up,
including UFO sightings. "
An 'irregularity'
Imbrogno further alleges that shortly after the UFO infringement,
a crack in the reactor's casing was discovered. The public didn't
hear about such a situation until a year later; the NYPA's Patrick
denied any "crack, " although he did recall a time when Reactor #2
may have developed an "irregularity. " Imbrogno says, "[Indian
Point officials] made a public statement that operations were not
affected, that everything was normal. But I've been told by several
people that they lost power, the security system dropped, and the
reactor controls went crazy. Apparently it was caused by the UFO."
No way, says the NYPA. "Any implication that the sightings of
these [light aircraft] in any way affected Reactor #3 is false",
Patrick said. Imbrogno's sources indicate otherwise. Supposedly, a
mass of sophisticated, high-accuracy tracking equipment was
installed at the complex, enabling security to quickly generate a
computer image of whatever aircraft might be affecting the
equipment. Apparently such problems are still going on. Patrick
would not comment on what kinds of security equipment protect
Indian Point, but stressed that nothing new has been installed
since the incident.
Imbrogno is also suspicious that the armed security forces at the
site may have had reason to attempt firing on the craft, again an
allegation flatly refuted by the NYPA. "I know a number of
helicopters with rocket launchers were sent up and followed the
craft for some distance," Imbrogno commented, citing his anonymous
sources for the info. "When these helicopters went on their way,
the object moved off and started crossing the Hudson, and
disappeared up north."
Officials will not talk to Imbrogno, nor answer his letters, he
says. UFO spoke with Cliff Spieler, vice president at the New York
Power Authority. He, like Patrick, basically dismisses the entire
affair. "Having looked into this thing and living two miles from
Indian Point, think the UFO reports are nonsense, " he said. "[All
Hudson Valley UFO sightings] are linked to small planes flying out
of Duchess County."
At one time, officials speaking for Indian Point made their
position quite clear to Imbrogno, "They said, 'you can cooperate
with us, or you don't have to cooperate with us. If you don't
cooperate with us, you have to face the consequences, because you
are dealing in an area of national security. The incident that took
place over there involved national security because it was a breach
of security at a nuclear reactor.' But they weren't ready to say
who was breaching security!" In considering the "who," Imbrogno
took in a number of hypotheses, including the possibility that the
incident was an elaborate test flight of a secret military craft,
such as the B-2 Stealth bomber, or a covertly-planned contingency
test of the plant's security operations, carried out under the
guise of a UFO overflight.
Nothing is impossible, he'll admit. But the most tenable answer,
he feels, is that the UFO was an extraterrestrial craft. "I don't
think our government could be so bold with a craft of the kind that
appeared at Indian Point," he said. "Talking to these security
people, and looking into their eyes," his voice trailed, " . .
. they tell a story of this one cop who got up on the roof below
the UFO, and the thing started moving a little bit. He pulled out
his gun, looked at it, then put the gun back in his holster and
ducked! . . . The people who were telling these stories are not
familiar with the UFO literature. If I really wanted to go into
this, with no fear of what would happen to me, I'm sure there's an
incredible story here. I am still being given
information about certain things going on there-In the nighttime,
people seeing little creatures coming through the walls of the
casing on the reactor, and military personnel indicating 'we're
aware of these creatures and we don't care if they're from outer
space-shoot 'em!' . . . On a newscast on Channel 7 in New York,
they were interviewing one guy, and he said, 'I saw it going over
the reactor! I think they're sucking the power from it! That's what
they're doing!' But a civilization that has this type of vehicle-
any intelligence, whatever it is-I'm sure doesn't need nuclear
energy."
Ed. Note: In a letter to UFO shortly after this article was
written, Imbrogno added to his remarks. "It is hard to believe
that people like John Lear and Bill Cooper are revealing 'top
secret' information with little or no repercussions. I just poked
my nose a little too deep into an area of national security and got
my ears pinned back for it. My next step is to approach this in a
legal way by asking for an investigation (preferably by a member of
Congress) to find out how and why the security at this
government reactor was violated and why information is being
withheld."
End of file.
--- ZMailQ 1.10 @9:1012/3.0
* Origin: ParaNet Alpha Delta <sm> The Data Base (9:1012/3)


168
textfiles.com/ufo/indict.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
INDICTMENT
The Government of these United States of America, having been
formed under the Constitution and having been duly elected
and appointed by the people of these United States of America
under the terms of the Constitution, has violated the public
trust, terms, conditions and laws of the land as outlined and
enshrined within the Constitution of these United States of
America.
To Wit: (1) The government has approved and entered into
a secret treaty with an Alien Nation against
the terms of the Constitution and without the
advise and consent of the Congress or the
people.
(2) The government in this treaty has given this
Alien Nation land and bases within the
borders of these United States of America.
(3) The government in this treaty has traded
human lives and property for the alien
technology and has denied the citizens of
these United States of America the lawful
protection due them under the Constitution.
The property is in the form of livestock and
land.
(4) In the taking of human lives, property and
livestock of the citizens of these United
States and in the commission of numerous
other abominable and barbarous acts, this
Alien Nation has proven to be the mortal
enemy of the people, the nation, and all of
humanity. Abductions, surgical operations,
implantations, biological sampling,
impregnations, psychological damage, and
other horrors have been and are being
performed upon humans by this Alien Nation.
For these reasons a state of war now exists
and has existed between the people of the
United States and this Alien Nation.
(5) In approving of, and participating in the
crimes outlined in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, the government is in violation of
Article II Section 2, Article III Section 3
and several other Articles of the
Constitution, and is guilty of and is hereby
charged with murder and treason against the
people and the Constitution of these United
States of America.
(6) In the process of aiding and abetting the
Alien Nation in the performance of these
crimes against the people, the Nation, and
humanity, the government, with full knowledge
and consent, has murdered, incarcerated,
forcibly relocated, brainwashed, drugged,
harassed and otherwise interfered unlawfully
in the lives of patriots who have attempted
to expose this murder and treason.
(7) In the pursuit of bringing all those in or
out of the government who are responsible for
these acts of murder and treason to justice,
the President, Vice President, the Director
of Central Intelligence, the Director of the
National Security Agency, certain members of
the President's Cabinet, those people
designated MAJORITY, MAJORITY TWELVE, MJ-12,
MAJORITY AGENCY FOR JOINT INTELLIGENCE
(MAJI), the JASON SOCIETY or JASON SCHOLARS,
the DIRECTOR of the SENIOR INTERAGENCY GROUP
(SIG), the National Security Advisor to the
President, and others having taken part in
the joint government and alien conspiracy are
hereby charged with murder and treason. This
is to include all those who served in these
positions from 1953 up to and including the
present administration.
(8) In the interest of preserving the Consti-
tution and the government of these United
States of America, and to save and protect
the human race, and for no other reason, we
bring these charges by the authority of the
Constitution of these United States of
America, against those named who had full
knowledge of and who willfully participated
in the violations of Article II Section 2,
Article III Section 3 and several other
Articles of the Constitution of these United
States of America. The government and those
individuals named in paragraph 7 are hereby
charged with murder and treason.
(9) In the interest of preserving the Consti-
tution and the government of these United
States of America, we ask full pardon in
exchange for full disclosure. We ask the
Judicial branch of the government to honor
this request for all guilty parties who voice
full disclosure by April 30, 1989. We ask
the Judicial branch to give no mercy to those
who persist in this murder and treason.
(10) We hereby, and in the name of the people
and by the authority of the constitution,
charge the government to cease aiding and
abetting and concealing this Alien Nation
which exists within our borders. We charge
the government to cease all operations,
projects, treaties, and any other involvement
with this Alien Nation. We charge the
government to order this Alien Nation and all
of its members to leave the United States and
this earth immediately, now and for all time,
by June 1, 1989, and we charge the government
to enforce this order. We further charge the
government to make a complete disclosure of
its alien involvement to the American people
prior to April 30, 1989 and to make a full
accounting for its actions. We charge the
Congress to order this to be done and we
charge the Congress to enforce this order.
(11) Should the Executive, Judicial, and Legis-
lative branches choose to ignore these
charges, we hereby swear upon the
Constitution that we will not rest until
these crimes are exposed to the American
people. We swear on the Constitution that
all guilty parties shall be brought to
justice. We swear that we will persist until
our death to accomplish these ends in the
name of humanity, the Constitution of these
United States of America, and in the name of
all true patriots who have gone before us, we
do so swear.
(12) We firmly believe and know and have evidence
that these crimes and charges are true and
have occurred and is now true and is now
occurring and were and are perpetrated, aided
and abetted by those so charged. This we do
swear.
Being of sound mind and body and with full knowledge of the
implications and consequences of these charges and having
only the interest of saving humanity, preserving the Con-
stitution of these United States, preserving the government
of these United States, and, being patriots, having sworn
to preserve and protect the Constitution of these United
States of America do affix our signature to this document
in full affirmation of our dedication and commitment to our
sworn duty.
(Signature) (Signature)
Milton William Cooper John Allen Lear
1311 S. Highland #205 1414 Hollywood Blvd.
Fullerton, California Las Vegas, Nevada
92632 89110


282
textfiles.com/ufo/indict1asc.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,282 @@
PETITION TO INDICT
The Government of these United States of America, having been
formed under the Constitution and having been duly elected
and appointed by the people of these United States of America
under the terms of the Constitution, has violated the public
trust, terms, conditions and laws of the land as outlined and
enshrined within the Constitution of these United States of
America.
To Wit: (1) The government has approved and entered into
a secret treaty with an Alien Nation against
the terms of the Constitution and without the
advise and consent of the Congress or the
people.
(2) The government in this treaty has given this
Alien Nation land and bases within the
borders of these United States of America.
(3) The government in this treaty has traded
human lives and property for the alien
technology and has denied the citizens of
these United States of America the lawful
protection due them under the Constitution.
The property is in the form of livestock and
land.
(4) In the taking of human lives, property and
livestock of the citizens of these United
States and in the commission of numerous
other abominable and barbarous acts, this
Alien Nation has proven to be the mortal
enemy of the people, the nation, and all of
humanity. Abductions, surgical operations,
implantations, biological sampling,
impregnations, psychological damage, and
other horrors have been and are being
performed upon humans by this Alien Nation.
For these reasons a state of war now exists
and has existed between the people of the
United States and this Alien Nation.
(5) In approving of, and participating in the
crimes outlined in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, the government is in violation of
Article II Section 2, Article III Section 3
and several other Articles of the
Constitution, and is guilty of and is hereby
charged with conspiracy, murder and treason
against the people and the Constitution of
these United States of America.
(6) In the process of aiding and abetting the
Alien Nation in the performance of these
crimes against the people, the Nation, and
humanity, the government, with full knowledge
and consent, has murdered, incarcerated,
forcibly relocated, brainwashed, drugged,
harassed and otherwise interfered unlawfully
in the lives of patriots, including a
President of the United States, who have
attempted to expose this murder and treason.
(7) To keep this secret from the Congress and
from the people of these United States of
America, the Government has financed its
Alien involvement through the importation
and sale of illegal narcotics to the nations
people and specifically to the nations youth.
The Central Intelligence Agency has been and
continues to be the main instrument in the
control of the worlds drug market. "The use
of illegal narcotics to finance the Alien
connected projects and other black projects
will identify and eliminate the weak elements
of our society", is the rationalization used
by the Government to justify these heinous
and treasonous acts.
(8) In the pursuit of bringing all those in or
out of the government who are responsible for
these acts of conspiracy, murder and treason
to justice, the Trilateral Commission, the
President, Vice President, the Director of
Central Intelligence, certain other members
of the Central Intelligence Agency, the
Director of the National Security Agency,
certain members of the President's Cabinet,
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, those people
designated MAJORITY, MAJORITY TWELVE, MJ-12,
MAJORITY AGENCY FOR JOINT INTELLIGENCE
(MAJI), the JASON SOCIETY or JASON SCHOLARS,
the DIRECTOR of the SENIOR INTERAGENCY GROUP
(SIG), the National Security Advisor to the
President, the Navy Department which has
field operational control of all Alien
connected projects, and others having taken
part in the joint government and alien
conspiracy are hereby charged with conspiracy
murder and treason. This is to include all
those who served in these positions from 1953
up to and including the present
administration.
(9) We call for the impeachment of the President
of these United States, George Bush. He has
been a member of MJ-12 and the Trilateral
Commission since he was the President and CEO
of Zapata Oil. George Bush organized and has
headed the narcotics smuggling conspiracy
since its beginning. The offshore oil
platforms of Zapata Oil were used as staging
areas from which the drugs were moved into
these United States from Central and South
America without passing through customs or
undergoing inspection of any kind. We firmly
believe that George Bush now heads this
shadow government that controls the Alien
technology, the military industrial complex,
and thus the Nation. The fact that he is now
the President of these United States of
America makes George Bush the most powerful
and dangerous criminal in the history of the
world.
(10) In the interest of preserving the Consti-
tution and the government of these United
States of America, and to save and protect
the human race, and for no other reason, we
bring these charges by the authority of the
Constitution of these United States of
America, against those named who had full
knowledge of and who willfully participated
in the violations of Article II Section 2,
Article III Section 3 and several other
Articles of the Constitution of these United
States of America. The government and those
individuals named in paragraph 8 and 9 are
hereby charged with conspiracy, murder and
treason.
(11) In the interest of preserving the Consti-
tution and the government of these United
States of America, we ask full pardon in
exchange for full disclosure. We ask the
Judicial branch of the government to honor
this request for all guilty conspirators who
voice full disclosure by May 30, 1989. We
ask the Judicial branch to give no mercy to
those who persist in this conspiracy, murder
and treason.
(12) We hereby, and in the name of the people
and by the authority of the constitution,
charge the government to cease aiding and
abetting and concealing this Alien Nation
which exists within our borders. We charge
the government to cease all conspiracies,
operations, projects, treaties, and any other
involvement with this Alien Nation. We
charge the government to order this Alien
Nation and all of its members to leave the
United States and this earth immediately, now
and for all time, by November 1, 1989, and we
charge the government to enforce this order.
We further charge the government to make a
complete disclosure of its alien conspiracy
to the American people prior to May 30, 1989
and to make a full accounting for its
actions. We charge the Congress to order
this to be done and we charge the Congress to
enforce this order.
(13) Should the Executive, Judicial, and Legis-
lative branches choose to ignore these
charges, we hereby swear upon the
Constitution that we will not rest until
this conspiracy and these crimes are exposed
to the American people. We swear on the
Constitution that all guilty parties shall be
brought to justice. We swear that we will
persist until our death to accomplish these
ends in the name of humanity, the
Constitution of these United States of
America, and in the name of all true patriots
who have gone before us, we do so swear.
(14) We firmly believe and know and have evidence
that this conspiracy and these crimes and
charges are true and have occurred and is now
true and is now occurring and were and are
perpetrated, aided and abetted by those so
charged. This we do swear.
(15) We hereby, and upon delivery of this document
to the members of the Senate and House of
Representatives of the Congress of these
United States of America, serve notice to the
world that these charges and this document
are now and forever recorded in history.
This document and these charges will not and
cannot ever be revoked by any act, present or
future. History alone will be the judge
should the Congress fail to act and we have
no fear of that judgement. We hereby warn
each member of the Senate and the House of
Representatives of the Congress of these
United States of America that failure to act
upon these charges will forever brand each
and every one of you as accessories to the
conspiracy and the crimes outlined in this
document. Your children, grand-children,
great grand-children, and the present and
future generations of the people of these
United States of America will not forget and
will never forgive. We warn you now and
forever that these United States of America,
the Constitution, and Freedom, has never been
in greater danger. We hope and pray that it
is not already to late to save the Nation.
Being of sound mind and body and with full knowledge of the
implications and consequences of these charges and having
only the interest of saving humanity, preserving the Con-
stitution of these United States, preserving the government
of these United States, and, being patriots, having sworn
to preserve and protect the Constitution of these United
States of America do affix our signature to this document
in full affirmation of our dedication and commitment to our
sworn duty.
Milton William Cooper
1311 S. Highland #205
Fullerton, California
92632
Many other signatures exist on the original copy of this
document. Due to the historical significance of this
document, the document and attached signatures are being
preserved in a safe place for future generations. If
Congress acts upon these charges, the original copy with
the attached signatures will be presented to the Congress
in Washington DC at such time that it becomes necessary.
The other signatories will not be revealed unless congress
acts upon these charges. It is in this manner that we can
guarantee that others may continue to work to expose this
madness should the Congress fail to act. If anything
should happen to me a large network of people exist to
carry on our work and eventually bring the criminals to
justice.
As a witness to these crimes, I respectfully petition the
Congress for protection. My life and the lives of my
family are now in danger. I also respectfully petition the
Congress for protection for all other witnesses who can be
produced and for protection of those others who have signed
the original document. I also petition the Congress to
take steps to protect the evidence which we have collected
and which is stored in various locations and with various
people throughout the United States. I beg the Congress
not to trust any other government agency with these matters
because this conspiracy runs deep within the government. I
beg you to trust only the Congress in these matters. I
also beg the members of Congress who intend to act upon
this petition to take positive steps to protect your own
lives.
Respectfully,
Milton William Cooper
(714) 680-9537


168
textfiles.com/ufo/indictment.us Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
INDICTMENT
The Government of these United States of America, having been
formed under the Constitution and having been duly elected
and appointed by the people of these United States of America
under the terms of the Constitution, has violated the public
trust, terms, conditions and laws of the land as outlined and
enshrined within the Constitution of these United States of
America.
To Wit: (1) The government has approved and entered into
a secret treaty with an Alien Nation against
the terms of the Constitution and without the
advise and consent of the Congress or the
people.
(2) The government in this treaty has given this
Alien Nation land and bases within the
borders of these United States of America.
(3) The government in this treaty has traded
human lives and property for the alien
technology and has denied the citizens of
these United States of America the lawful
protection due them under the Constitution.
The property is in the form of livestock and
land.
(4) In the taking of human lives, property and
livestock of the citizens of these United
States and in the commission of numerous
other abominable and barbarous acts, this
Alien Nation has proven to be the mortal
enemy of the people, the nation, and all of
humanity. Abductions, surgical operations,
implantations, biological sampling,
impregnations, psychological damage, and
other horrors have been and are being
performed upon humans by this Alien Nation.
For these reasons a state of war now exists
and has existed between the people of the
United States and this Alien Nation.
(5) In approving of, and participating in the
crimes outlined in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4
above, the government is in violation of
Article II Section 2, Article III Section 3
and several other Articles of the
Constitution, and is guilty of and is hereby
charged with murder and treason against the
people and the Constitution of these United
States of America.
(6) In the process of aiding and abetting the
Alien Nation in the performance of these
crimes against the people, the Nation, and
humanity, the government, with full knowledge
and consent, has murdered, incarcerated,
forcibly relocated, brainwashed, drugged,
harassed and otherwise interfered unlawfully
in the lives of patriots who have attempted
to expose this murder and treason.
(7) In the pursuit of bringing all those in or
out of the government who are responsible for
these acts of murder and treason to justice,
the President, Vice President, the Director
of Central Intelligence, the Director of the
National Security Agency, certain members of
the President's Cabinet, those people
designated MAJORITY, MAJORITY TWELVE, MJ-12,
MAJORITY AGENCY FOR JOINT INTELLIGENCE
(MAJI), the JASON SOCIETY or JASON SCHOLARS,
the DIRECTOR of the SENIOR INTERAGENCY GROUP
(SIG), the National Security Advisor to the
President, and others having taken part in
the joint government and alien conspiracy are
hereby charged with murder and treason. This
is to include all those who served in these
positions from 1953 up to and including the
present administration.
(8) In the interest of preserving the Consti-
tution and the government of these United
States of America, and to save and protect
the human race, and for no other reason, we
bring these charges by the authority of the
Constitution of these United States of
America, against those named who had full
knowledge of and who willfully participated
in the violations of Article II Section 2,
Article III Section 3 and several other
Articles of the Constitution of these United
States of America. The government and those
individuals named in paragraph 7 are hereby
charged with murder and treason.
(9) In the interest of preserving the Consti-
tution and the government of these United
States of America, we ask full pardon in
exchange for full disclosure. We ask the
Judicial branch of the government to honor
this request for all guilty parties who voice
full disclosure by April 30, 1989. We ask
the Judicial branch to give no mercy to those
who persist in this murder and treason.
(10) We hereby, and in the name of the people
and by the authority of the constitution,
charge the government to cease aiding and
abetting and concealing this Alien Nation
which exists within our borders. We charge
the government to cease all operations,
projects, treaties, and any other involvement
with this Alien Nation. We charge the
government to order this Alien Nation and all
of its members to leave the United States and
this earth immediately, now and for all time,
by June 1, 1989, and we charge the government
to enforce this order. We further charge the
government to make a complete disclosure of
its alien involvement to the American people
prior to April 30, 1989 and to make a full
accounting for its actions. We charge the
Congress to order this to be done and we
charge the Congress to enforce this order.
(11) Should the Executive, Judicial, and Legis-
lative branches choose to ignore these
charges, we hereby swear upon the
Constitution that we will not rest until
these crimes are exposed to the American
people. We swear on the Constitution that
all guilty parties shall be brought to
justice. We swear that we will persist until
our death to accomplish these ends in the
name of humanity, the Constitution of these
United States of America, and in the name of
all true patriots who have gone before us, we
do so swear.
(12) We firmly believe and know and have evidence
that these crimes and charges are true and
have occurred and is now true and is now
occurring and were and are perpetrated, aided
and abetted by those so charged. This we do
swear.
Being of sound mind and body and with full knowledge of the
implications and consequences of these charges and having
only the interest of saving humanity, preserving the Con-
stitution of these United States, preserving the government
of these United States, and, being patriots, having sworn
to preserve and protect the Constitution of these United
States of America do affix our signature to this document
in full affirmation of our dedication and commitment to our
sworn duty.
(Signature) (Signature)
Milton William Cooper John Allen Lear
1311 S. Highland #205 1414 Hollywood Blvd.
Fullerton, California Las Vegas, Nevada
92632 89110

78
textfiles.com/ufo/infoclas.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
The following is a listing of classifications / descriptions used in various
'ufo' texts and classification systems...
SIGHTING CLASSIFICATIONS
Below are the classifications of various types of UFO reports according to
proximity and activity. Suggested by J. Hynek & used by the Computer UFO
Network.
>LONG RANGE SIGHTINGS :farther than 500ft. distant from ufo:.
+LRS-DD: Daylight Disk
+LRS-NL: Nocturnal Lights
+LRS-RV: Radar & Visual
>CLOSE ENCOUNTERS :within 500ft from ufo:
+First Kind <CE-1>: Simple sighting of an object/ufo.
+Second Kind<CE-2>: Object interacts with the environment (including
electromagnetic effects, ground traces, radiation,
animal excitement.
+Third Kind <CE-3>: Witness sights occupants in or around UFO.
+Fourth Kind<CE-4>: Occupants communicate with witness in some way.
+Fifth Kind <CE-5>: Abduction of witness.
STRANGENESS AND PROBABILITY RATINGS
This is a 5 point rating system used by Paranet BBS's of the National
Fringe Sciences information Service to help establish the credibility of
sighting reports.These ratings are NOT used by CUFON, which does not
speculate.
*1. Explained or Explainable.
*2. Probably Explainable, with more data.
*3. Possibly Explainable, but with elements/ strangeness.
*4. Stange, does not conform with the norm.
*5. Highly strange, definately indicative of intelligent guidance.
EXAMPLES:
S1-Weather balloons, meteor, bolides, aircraft, etc..
S2-Experimental aircraft, celestial object(planet/star/).
S3-Slow, low flying object in formation.
S4-Bol (ball of light phenomena) physical traces.
S5-Close encounters,Abductions.
>PROBABILITY FACTOR/ #
Relates to the credibility, # & separation of witnesses and the
soundness of evidence.
*1-Not credible or sound.
*2-Unreliable, probably a hoax.
*3-Somewhat credible or indeterminate.
*4-Credible and sound.
*5-Highly credible, no doubt.
EXAMPLES:
*P1-Known hoaxer; photo hoax.
*P2-Repeat witness;conflicting testimony.
*P3-Standard,first time witness ;some radiation reading.
*P4-Multiple witnesses; pilot; good photo.
*P5-National figure, mutiple independent witnesses, videotape
Composite Stangeness/Probability Rating of a case involves of
the combined S/P factors.
EXAMPLES:
S1-Wickenburg, AZ; July 10
S2/P5-X-shaped UFO,Petaluma, CA
S4/P5-Brazillian ping pong ball
S5/P4-Betty & Barney Hill
S4/P4-Lubbock lights
S5/P5-Helicopter (Coyne case)
S3/P2-Delphos


374
textfiles.com/ufo/informnt.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,374 @@
======================================================================
<<UFONET I>> * 416-237-1204 * PC-Pursuitable * File Requestable * HST
* 24 Hour Operation * Sysop - Tom Mickus * Toronto * FREE
======================================================================
======================================================================
INFORMNT.TXT - "AN MJ-12 INFORMANT"
^^^^^^^^^
- by T. Scott Crain, Jr.
======================================================================
Note: The following article was submitted to the MUFON Journal for
copyrighted publication. It was written in October/89.
======================================================================
AN MJ-12 INFORMANT
------------------
by T. Scott Crain, Jr.
During the past decade or so, evidence has been stacking up
that the U.S. Government has involved itself in retrieving crashed
UFOs and their occupants. A major outlet for these types of cases
were first reported in the summer of 1978, when Ohio researcher
Leonard H. Stringfield, presented 17 abstracts reviewing 'Retrievals
the Third Kind,' cases of alleged UFOs and occupants in military
custody, at the Mutual UFO Network's annual symposium held in Dayton,
Ohio that year. Critic's of Stringfield's paper argued that because
his informants wished to remain anonymous, it was virtually impossible
to verify the claims. He continued his quest for more details on the
UFO crash retrieval question, and published subsequent updates in 1980
and 1982. But spectacular claims require extraordinary evidence, and
Stringfield's anecdotal evidence was insufficient to prove the case.
In 1980, noted linguist Charles Berlitz and UFO investigator
William L. Moore released the book, 'The Roswell Incident' that describes
how the military intervened and kept secret from the American public the
recovery of a crashed UFO and occupants outside Roswell, New Mexico in
1947. The case was recently reexamined on the September 20, 1989
episode of NBC-TV's 'Unsolved Mysteries,' which highlighted several
witnesses to the investigation and one informant. The informant, Sappho
Henderson of West Hills, California, told how her late husband, Captain
Oliver Wendell Henderson, was the pilot who flew the saucer wreckage in
an Air Force plane to a base in Dayton, Ohio. Walter G. Haut, who was
a public-relations officer at Roswell Army Air Force base in July, 1947,
was also on the show, and verified that wreckage from a flying saucer
was recovered by the Air Force.
In September, 1989, UFO researcher Jerome Clark indicates that
at least three dozen new informants have been interviewed, and that the
"Roswell incident is surrendering more and more of its secrets, including
the biggest ones." Investigators for the J. Allen Hynek Center for UFO
Studies are making some interesting discoveries, and hopefully a report
of their findings will be released in the near future.
Support that a UFO did crash near Roswell was bolstered up again
in 1987, when English writer Timothy Good published for the first time
alleged official U.S. Government documents outlining how twelve men
working for the U.S. Government orchestrated the recovery and evaluation
of a crashed disc that was removed from Roswell, New Mexico, in July,
1947. A similar release of this so called 'Briefing Document: Operation
Majestic 12' occurred several weeks later in the USA by the research
team of William L. Moore, Jaime H. Shandera and Stanton T. Friedman.
According to the documents, MJ-12 was a group of distinguished
scientists, military and intelligence officials, established by President
Harry Truman to control the recovery of UFOs. Newspapers around the
globe reported the allegations that the United States Government covered
up a UFO crash landing, and recovered it's occupants. But no official
spokesman would confirm that any of this was true. How does one prove
MJ-12 exist and the documents are real?
Canadian UFO researcher and nuclear physicist Stanton Friedman,
was awarded a $16,000. grant by the Fund for UFO Research to answer
that question, and he has generated a great deal of information to
support the validity of the documents. Unfortunately for Friedman, and
the rest of the research community, all the original designated MJ-12
members are dead, so any confirmation must come from second hand
information or locating other supporting documents to prove the case.
A progress report of his investigation was made at the 1989 Mutual UFO
Network symposium, held in Las Vegas, Nevada. Friedman reported there
is "...no indication that the documents are fradulent and a host of small
details which tend towards legitimacy for MJ-12."
Working on the assumption that the Majestic-12 documents are
possibly authentic, Canadian UFO researcher Grant Cameron and I found an
anchor in which to conduct our own investigation. We decided to pursue
people, not documents. Since the Briefing Document clearly states the
project is a "TOP SECRET Research and Development Intelligence operation..."
responsible to the President of the United States, Cameron and I went
fishing for former members of the R&D Board who were active during the
late 1940's and early 1950's. Someone out there had to have knowledge
of a project of this magnitude.
During our hunt, we discovered another researcher who had been
doing a similar check, William Steinman in California. Steinman, author
of the book, 'UFO Crash at Aztec,' had been corresponding with Fred Darwin,
the former Executive Director of the Guided Missile Committee for the
Department of Defense's R & D Board from 1949 to 1954. Steiman asked
Darwin who would be likely candidates for a flying saucer recovery
operation, if there ever were such a project. His reply is extraordinary,
considering he named these people in 1984, three years before the
Majestic-12 documents were made public. Darwin listed the following
names:
1.) Dr. Vannevar Bush
2.) Dr. Karl T. Compton
3.) Dr. Lloyd Berkner
4.) Dr. Robert F. Rinehart
5.) Dr. Eric A. Walker
6.) Dr. John Von Neumann
Bush and Berkner both appeared on the Majestic-12 list in 1987.
One name that came up that we found interesting was Dr. Eric Walker,
former President of the Pennsylvannia State University.
The fact that Walker may be involved originated with American
physicist Dr. Robert I. Sarbacher. In the 1950s, Sarbacher was serving
as a consultant for the military's R & D Board and was a member of the
Guidance & Control panel.
In a September 15, 1950, interview with Canadian scientist
Wilbert B. Smith, Sarbacher told Smith flying saucers exist, we have
not been able to duplicate their performance, and the subject of flying
saucers is classified two points higher than the H-bomb. When the
contents of this 1950 interview was made public through one of Leonard
Stringfield's monographs, 'UFO CRASH/RETRIEVAL: AMASSING THE EVIDENCE-
STATUS REPORT III' in 1982, Steinman managed to find Sarbacher in Palm
Beach, Florida, and wrote him for more information.
In a letter to Steinman dated November 23, 1983, Sarbacher
confirmed he was "...invited to participate in several discussions
associated with the reported recoveries..." (of UFOs) but that he was
unable to attend the meetings. Sarbacher stated that U.S. laboratories
analyzed that material that reportedly came from these flying saucer
crashes and that the hardware was "...extrememly light and very tough."
Sarbacher described the beings that controlled the flying saucer to
Steinman. He states:
"There were reports that instruments or people
operating these machines were also of very
light weight, sufficient to withstand the
tremendous deceleration and acceleration
associated with their machinery. I remember
in talking with some of the people at the
office that I got the impression these "aliens"
were constructed like certain insects we have
observed on earth, wherein because of the mass
the inertial forces involved in operation of
these instruments would be quite low."
In an October 1985 issue of the Flying Saucer Review, editor
Gordon Creighton gave further details about Sarbacher's involvement
in his article 'TOP U.S. SCIENTIST ADMITS CRASHED UFOs.' Creighton
writes that although Sarbacher didn't attend, the meetings about the
recoveries were held at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton,
Ohio, where officials were to report their findings to scientists
connected to the Defence Department's Joint Research and Development
Board.
During a telephone interview between researcher Stanton Friedman
and Robert Sarbacher, he asked Sarbacher if he could recall anyone who
attended those meetings. Although he could not recall his name, he
named enough clues to Friedman, that when William Steinman reviewed the
conversation, all the evidence led to Dr. Eric A. Walker. In the early
1950's, Walker was serving as Executive Secretary of the Research and
Development Board, and would have been a logical candidate to be asked
to attend UFO retrieval meetings, if they were held. In a letter to
Grant Cameron, Steinman said that when he made the discovery, he
telephoned Sarbacher and asked him if Dr. Eric Walker was the individual
he was trying to remember. Sarbacher's response, according to Steinman,
was Walker was the man who attended all those meetings at Wright-Patterson
Air Force Base.
If the evidence we have gathered is true, we now have identified a
scientist who was in a position to confirm or deny the U.S. Government's
crash retrieval program. Steinman states he telephoned Walker on August
30, 1987. According to Steinman's "word for word" telephone transcript
of the interview, Dr. Eric A. Walker confirmed attending these meetings
at Wright-Patterson AFB regarding the "military recovery of flying
saucers, and the bodies of the occupants." According to Steinman,
Walker acknowledged that he knew of MJ-12 and was familiar with them
since 1947. In the interview, Walker tells Steinman to "leave it alone,"
that he is "delving into a area that you do absolutely nothing about."
Steinman responds that the people have the right to know the truth,
and that he is "...not going to drop it."
Steinman has been investigating Walker since 1984, and received
several letters from Walker, one of which discusses a downed saucer.
Crain and Cameron teamed up in the fall of 1987, to learn as much as
we could about Walker's involvement, before releasing his name to
the public.
Although Dr. Walker is being less responsive these days regarding
inquiries into his past involvement with UFOs, Cameron and I believe we
have gathered enough background material on Dr. Walker to show he was
in the right place at the right time to know if the United States has
a crashed UFO in military custody. A report of our findings have been
assembled in a book, 'UFOs, MJ-12 AND THE GOVERNMENT,' which we hope to
release in the near future.
================================= EOF =======================================
=============================================================================
= IF YOU HAVE ANY UFO RELATED INFORMATION THAT YOU WOULD LIKE US TO SEE =
= OR HAVE DISTRIBUTED, YOU CAN NOW SEND IT VIA OUR NEW UFONET FAX LINE. =
=============================================================================
= ------>>> UFONET FAX HOTLINE - 24 Hrs - (414) 351-2075 <<<------ =
=============================================================================


107
textfiles.com/ufo/insd0189.asc Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
==============
INSIDE UFOLOGY
January 1989
==============
After a brief (four month?) hiatus, we return to our regular
column. Due to time limitations, its going to have to be an
abbreviated version...so much happening, so little time...
After much speculation and rumor, Budd Hopkins has confirmed the
story of a medical anomaly that might turn out to be an "alien
implant." In a speech in Tucson last month, and in answer to a
series of questions posed by ParaNet users, Hopkins said that an
MRI scan has detected a solid object "on or near the optical
nerve" of a female abductee in Georgia. Due to its proximity to
the crucial nerve, however, extraction of the object is
extremely dangerous and highly unlikely. One prominent ufologist
who attended the Tucson meeting speculated that "whatever the
object is, it isn't made of metal, otherwise the MRI would have
ripped it right out of her." (The M in MRI stands for Magnetic.)
SEE: HOPKINS.REP
Another medical anomaly that had fueled the imaginations of
abduction fans seems to have been put to rest. You may recall
the interest in an article that appeared in the British science
journal Nature in September 1986, wherein several geneticists
had submitted a photomicrograph of a cell from an unborn fetus.
Lodged in the cell was a highly symmetrical object that
resembled a crossword puzzle. The accompanying letter basically
asked, "What the hell is this?", and called on colleagues
for an explanation. Abduction proponents, quick to grab onto any
piece of evidence that might lead to a breakthrough, distributed
the letter and the photograph through the grapevine, insinuating
a resemblance to a computer chip, and have continued to do so
until the present. Unfortunately, they were a little TOO quick.
Had they picked up the very same journal the very next month,
they would have seen that the anomaly has been explained as part
of a Diatom skeleton, something quite ordinary and non-alien.
That this "mystery" should have been propagated so long after
the explanation had been rendered is testimony to the
will-to-believe and suspension of good judgement of many in the
UFO field. Come on, gang. If we're going to play at Science,
let's at least play by the rules. (Credit: Jim Melesciuc, "Bits
and Pieces") SEE: CHIP.UFO
Also from Bits and Pieces: "A petition calling for congressional
hearings on ufOs is being circulated by MUFON Deputy Director
John Schuessler. Betty Cash is assisting Schuessler with this
task. Betty was injured during a close encounter on Dec. 29,
1980, along with Vickie and Colby Landrum. It may be that this
drive for congressional hearings resulted from the disclosure of
"Falcon's" information aired on UFO Cover-Up Live. In the
program Falcon (Doty) stated that the Cash/Landrum UFO was a
government test flight of an extraterrestrial craft which got
out of hand."
Not-exactly-UFO-related-but-funny-anyway-dept.:
Bigfootologist-Dracontologist-Ufologist Jon-Erik Beckjord is
finally opening his long-awaited "Cryptozoology Museum." After
several false starts, one in a mobile home, the museum has found
residence in, of all places, Trancas' Restaurant of Malibu, CA.
In his press release, Beckjord was quick to point out that
Trancas is "famous in the LA Area as being a good dance spot as
well as for being a good family restaurant serving
American-style cuisine." He also stated its a hangout for such
Hollywood heavyweights as Jan-Michael Vincent. Beckjord says he
felt that the coastal area was an "excellent spot" for the
temporary museum (a larger facility is planned for a future
date) because of reports of Bigfoot in the nearby Ventura
mountains, and sea serpent sightings off the coast. When
pressed, Beckjord admitted that yes, the famous Bigfoot feces
sample (as seen on David Letterman) would be on display, but
presumably behind glass so that over-zealous restaurant staffers
would be unable to confuse the sample with the house special.
The official opening is February 9th, with a pre-opening party
scheduled the night before.
The Fund for UFO Research is looking to raise $16,000 for an
all-out, no-holds-barred study of the Majestic-12 documents.
A proposal submitted to the Fund by MJ-12-ologist Stan Friedman
calls for a four-month study, which would involve "travelling to
several Presidential libraries, visiting some people who may
have important information and writing a full report of his
activities." The Fund has already granted Friedman $500 to cover
the cost of his Long Distance phone calls over the past
year.
Finally, in what may be the most encouraging development of the
new year, a heavy-hitter journalist named Howard Blum is
tackling the Cosmic Watergate. Blum is author of "I Pledge
Allegiance," about the Walker Spy Ring case, and has been
nominated for two Pulitzer prizes. According to UFO Magazine,
Blum's book will prove that active government investigation of
UFOs did not end with Blue Book.
Till next month...Happy Hunting!
< * * * >
This edition of INSIDE UFOLOGY is respectfully dedicated to the
memory of Maj. Donald E. Keyhoe, the father of the UFO movement,
who passed away Nov. 29th.


80
textfiles.com/ufo/insd0288.asc Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
--------------
INSIDE UFOLOGY
February 1988
--------------
There already seems to be some controversy surrounding the series of UFO
sightings reported in Gulf Breezes, Florida. In that case, a building
contractor claims to have taken as many as 16 Polaroid photos and one Beta
videotape of an object hovering near his home, not far from Pensacola. The
sightings started around the middle of last November, and were exciting
enough to MUFON State Director Donald Ware that he immediately called Walt
Andrus, MUFON's Grand Poobah, in Texas and said, "You better get over
here." He did get over there, and was duly impressed by what he saw. "Very
high quality stuff," was Andrus' reaction.
Budd Hopkins has reportedly just returned from Florida, where he, too,
viewed the evidence, and he, too, was very excited. And so was MUFON's
Director of Investigations, Dan Wright. "This stuff puts Billy Meier to
shame," seems to be the general reaction.
But the comparisons with Meier are more than just casual. For one thing,
despite repeated appearances by the object, no other witnesses have
stepped forward, although word has it that several ANONYMOUS witnesses do
exist. For another, its amazing how lucky one man can be, to be in the
right place at the right time, several times running, to knock off a few
good UFO pictures, when the rest of us slobs go entire lifetimes without
even seeing a strange light in the sky. And its been our experience that
cases that seem too good to be true, always are.
Further, its reported that NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory has given the
videotape a cursory examination, and considers it a probable fraud. But
the examination did not make use of JPL's sophisticated computer analysis
facilities; rather, it was one man's opinion based on an eyeball of the
video.
Its entirely possible that we finally have definitive photographic proof
that alien spacecraft are operating in our atmosphere, and only time, and
widespread distribution of the video, will tell at this point. Certainly,
judging by the animated reaction of the normally stoic Wright, something
worth looking into has occurred, and its guaranteed to be one of the
classics of the field. We don't want to rain on anyone's parade, but we
counsel equal doses of caution and enthusiasm.
--------------
Speaking of JPL, those three letters seem to be coming up more and more
often these days. In addition to the above analysis, at least two high
priests of that high-tech temple of Empiricism have held forth on the
Brewster video of the Hudson Valley Object, one pronouncing it an unknown
and the other putting the lie to the "planes in formation" theory.
Abduction expert Tracy Torme' visited the lab a while back (in the guise
of the new Executive Story Editor for Star Trek), and managed to elicit
curiosity in UFOs from some of the lab technicians and scientists. And Dr.
Lew Allen, the lab's director, has been mentioned as a possible MJ-12
member. Recall that JPL is the West Coast outpost of mega-skeptic Carl
Sagan....I'll bet they have some DANDY conversations there....
--------------
An extremely reliable ParaNet source has uncovered confirmation, of sorts,
that a group calling itself Justice for Military Personnel did exist as
recently as 1975/76. It was apparently a paralegal organization which
specialized in providing legal assistance to military types and their
families. Our source tells us that one of their assignments was to help
cut through some red tape at Bentwaters AFB in England, site of a famous
UFO landing. (See JMP.UFO, Library Section 1).
--------------
AND FINALLY...
Allen Benz, president of the Foundation for UFO Research, on the
cancellation of that group's highly touted banquet in Tucson:
"Oh, well, no use crying over crashed saucers...."
---Jim Speiser


134
textfiles.com/ufo/insd0289.asc Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
==============
INSIDE UFOLOGY
February 1989
==============
FRIEDMAN 1, KLASS 0
ParaNet Alpha 02/05 -- A minor victory may have been won by MJ-12
proponents in their never-ending battle against UFO "negativist"
Phil Klass, a victory that could cost Klass up to $1000.
First, a little refresher on some of the finer points of MJ-12.
A central document in the controversy is the Cutler-Twining Memo of
July 14th, 1954, in which Presidential Assistant Robert Cutler
informs Gen. Nathan Twining of a slight change in the scheduled
meeting of MJ-12. This document is said to be independent
confirmation of the existence of the super-secret Presidential UFO
panel, since it was found in the National Archives. The closest
scrutiny has been paid to this memo, and thus far it has
seemingly eluded debunking. For all intents and purposes, it has
the look, feel, and tenor of the real thing.
However, it is not without controversy. For starters, an Archives
expert has denied its authenticity on historical grounds. The
alleged maker of the memo, Robert Cutler, was out of the country
when it was typed. Researchers counter that Cutler's assistants,
James Lay and Patrick Coyne, routinely sent out memos under
Cutler's name, and they point to the fact that the memo (extant now
in carbon copy only) is unsigned.
Since the release of the MJ-12 package of documents in April of
1987, CSICOPer Klass has hammered away at the Cutler/Twining memo,
and in his latest barrage, argues that it is in a typeface known as
Pica, or 12 point, referring to the height of the characters. In a
letter to MJ-12-ologist Stan Friedman dated January 16th of this
year, Klass states, "You will note that in the tradition of that
era, these White House executives used the smaller Elite typeface."
He encloses a "representative sample of typefaces used by Cutler
and Lay's offices during the 1953-1957 period," all of which are in
the Elite or 10-point typeface. "I challenge you to produce
known-to-be-authentic White House/business letters/memoranda
written by Cutler or Lay during the 1953-55 time period which use a
typeface identical in size and style to that used in the _alleged_
Cutler/Twining memo..."
Klass emphasises his challenge in traditional style by offering to
pay Friedman $100 for each such sample, up to a maximum of $1000.
In a response dated January 20th, Friedman provides no fewer than
20 such exemplars, more than enough to win the maximum prize.
His letter to Klass is sprinkled with almost gleeful invective. "I
am enclosing copies straight from my files of various Lay and
Cutler material...first ones at hand, but just the tip of the
iceberg...As usual you are flat out wrong because YOU DO NOT DO
YOUR HOMEWORK AND ARE NOT INTERESTED IN TRUTH." In addition, he
takes exception to Klass' statement that Elite is the "traditional"
White House typeface. "How do you dare speak of a tradition of
using elite type at the White House? Just how much White House
material have you examined? The Ike Lib. [Eisenhower Presidential
Library] alone has 250,000 pages of NSC material. The National
Archives has loads as well, but I guess it is too far for you."
(Klass lives in Washington, D.C., Friedman in Canada, yet the
MJ-12-ologist makes frequent trips to the Archives in Washington).
It is not the first major gaffe on Klass' part regarding the
documents. Back in November of 1987, the debunker sent out a memo
criticizing William Moore's seeming misspelling in "Air Materiel
Command", and slyly noted that the same misspelling crops up in the
Hillenkoetter Briefing, the central MJ-12 document, the implication
being that Moore, and not Hillenkoetter, authored the document. But
true to military tradition, "Materiel" is, for some reason, the
correct spelling in that context. To his credit, Klass was quick to
find his error and redistribute his memo with the words "I GOOFED"
plainly scrawled across the top. However, the incident is cited
by many as a prime example of Klass' quickness to point a finger
at Moore, whom he has all but accused of outright hoax in the MJ-12
affair.
It is not altogether certain that Friedman has won this round hands
down. Klass' letter specifically called for "letters" and
"memoranda"; Friedman provides only headings and dates in his
initial response. However, he promises more to come from his visits
to the Truman and Eisenhower libraries; presumably at that time he
will provide full copies of the documents, if he comes across any.
MUFON TO COOPER: NO THANKS
It is not known yet exactly why, but self-ordained Cosmic Watergate
prophet Bill Cooper was invited, and now has been DISinvited, to speak
at the upcoming MUFON convention in Las Vegas. At first, plans
called for a roundtable discussion of MJ-12 researchers, including
Cooper, John Lear, William Moore and Stan Friedman. But in a letter
from MUFON's International Director Walt Andrus, it was implied
that a credibility problem caused the convention planners to change
their minds about including Cooper, who for the past eight months has
flooded computer networks and radio talk shows with sensational
charges of conspiracies involving multi-layered government UFO
projects, underground alien bases, and government cooperation in
alien abductions.
Cooper, one of three individuals banned from using this network,
has made claims ranging from a "mere" UFO sighting to inside
knowledge of the structure and function of what he insists is the
Majority Agency for Joint Information, or MAJI. He has leveled
charges of disinformation against William Moore, who he claims is
purposely obfuscating the truth by propagating "Majestic-12"
information rather than "MAJI-Controlled" (MAJIC) information. He
has even implicated this reporter in the disinformation campaign.
Cooper's only corroboration is a Hawaiian named Robert Swan, whom
he claims he showed several documents back in 1972. Swan made
several generally corroborative statements to ParaNet's Tom Mickus,
but has thus far refused an in-depth interview with another ParaNet
operative in Hawaii.
Cooper was banned from most ParaNet outlets in October due to what
was termed "gross prevarication" regarding his claims. It is
against ParaNet's Code of Operating Standards to deliberately
provide false or misleading information regarding government
involvement in UFO research. Cooper, by his own admission, provided
contradictory data to the network, ostensibly for the purpose of
"finding out who knew what." Since then he has consistently failed
to provide documentary evidence to support his claims, and has
exhibited what many have termed a "paranoia" that his life is in
danger from sinister government forces for his campaign. That fear,
however, has not thus far stayed him from his continuous cries of
"cover-up" and "conspiracy"; whether his actions to this point
constitute heroism or histrionics remains unclear.
--Jim Speiser


88
textfiles.com/ufo/insd0688.asc Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
==============
INSIDE UFOLOGY
June 1988
==============
REFEREED JOURNAL A GIANT STEP FORWARD
ParaNet Alpha 06/20 -- Between the furor over the Gulf Breeze case,
the nebulous MJ-12 evidence, the death of Coral Lorenzen and the demise of
APRO, UFOlogy needs some good news to bring to the MUFON Symposium in
Lincoln this month.
Now it appears it has some.
According to Dr. Michael Swords, the Hynek Center for UFO Studies
will soon be publishing UFOlogy's first refereed science journal.
OK, so its not as exciting as the latest abduction tale, or as
titillating as a John Lear hypothesis. But to those who advocate serious,
scientific study of the UFO phenomenon, its a giant step forward. The
Journal of UFO Studies, as it will be called, will contain articles
submitted by experts in virtually every facet of the phenomenon, including
psychology, sociology, astronomy, physics, and history. The articles will
be screened by the Journal's Board of Editors, which, according to Swords,
reads like a Who's Who of UFOlogy. Heading the board and editing the
Journal will be Swords, himself a professor of genetics at Western
Michigan State University and a board member of CUFOS -- one of UFOdom's
heaviest hitters. After screening, each submission will undergo further
review by a professional in the same field, "preferably," says Swords,
"someone who has little or no previous connection with UFOs." The
reviewer, or "referee," is free to comment on the scientific, logical or
historical validity of the work, and if the work satisfies the basic
requirements for publication, those comments are also published in the
same or a subsequent issue of the Journal. The author can then answer the
referee's comments, and so on. The result is an ongoing dialogue, framed
in an objective, academic setting that most mainstream scientists would at
least find palatable, if not downright credible.
This system of "peer review" has been one of the missing elements
separating scientific UFOlogy from the mainstream. Long accused of
practicing "pseudo-science," UFOlogists have sought to improve their
methods and bring them in line with the standards of other, more
established sciences. One of those standards is the refereed publication.
In the past, UFO researchers who were otherwise academically qualified
would submit their works to the refereed journals of other disciplines,
only to meet with almost universal rejection -- usually accompanied by a
sneer. UFOlogy was, and for the most part still is, considered something
of a poor cousin to Science with a capital "S". Its simply "unfit" for
consideration by "real" scientists, we are told.
That is beginning to change. While the release of the Condon Report
in 1969 caused an exodus of news reporters to the cynical side, their
departure has overshadowed a slow but steady trickle of mainstream
scientists and academicians into the "believer" camp -- or more
accurately, the "let's-take-an-objective-look" camp. But these
professionals have been frustrated at the low standards of existing UFO
investigation, research, analysis, and reportage. Combine this with the
palpable sneering of their peers and the lack of a suitable outlet for
their research findings, and its easy to see why many scientists keep a
very low profile in the UFO community. Indeed, its almost certain that
there are other interested scholars out there who could and would make a
valuable contribution to the field, but stay away completely for fear of
scarring their reputations.
To such potential converts, the Journal of UFO Studies could
represent a watershed, a new demarcation of safe ground. It could send a
signal to the reluctant UFOlogist, saying, "It's alright, its safe to come
in here. We're younger and bolder and we're groping in the dark, but we're
just like the big boys." Swords claims to have already received favorable
responses from several academics, otherwise unconnected with the UFO
field, who have tentatively agreed to act as referees. Also, those who
have written negatively about UFOs in the past will be contacted to pass
judgement on submissions. Swords named as an example Dr. Robert Baker of
the University of Kentucky, who wrote a scathing denunciation of the
abduction syndrome for CSICOP. "As long as they are capable of keeping
things objective and scholarly," says Swords, "their submissions are
welcome." Swords did not comment on whether this included Phil Klass;
however, presumably he does not qualify as a scientist or academic.
Certainly his past writings have belied an inability to remain objective.
Swords hopes to publish the Journal quarterly, but admits that may
be unrealistic. "I think its more likely that it will wind up being semi-
annual." However often it comes out, it may just be the best thing to
happen to UFOlogy since Hynek's conversion.
Its certainly the best news I'VE heard this year.
--Jim Speiser


150
textfiles.com/ufo/insd0788.asc Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
==============
INSIDE UFOLOGY
July 1988
==============
CUFOS MEMBERS DO ABOUT-FACE ON GULF BREEZE
ParaNet Alpha 07/03 -- "History tells us that [UFO] pictures that look
fake...ARE fake." Those words, written by ufologist Jerome Clark, may come
back to haunt him. Clark edits the International UFO Reporter, organ of
the Center for UFO Studies, and is a longtime contributing editor to FATE
Magazine. His words were part of an editorial for the March/April issue of
the IUR, entitled "Ill Breeze," and referred to the series of photos taken
by "Mr. Ed" in Gulf Breeze, FL, of an object that Clark said resembled
"something that you use to cover a lightbulb with."
Clark was echoing the view held by many CUFOS staffers that the Gulf
Breeze photos just look too "hokey" to be real. Indeed, sentiments seem to
be running along almost strictly organizational lines: Don Schmitt, Mark
Rodeghier, Michael Swords, George Eberhardt, and Robert Boyd, CUFOS mem-
bers all, have each expressed extreme doubts about the case and its inves-
tigation, while most MUFON higher-ups, including Dennis Stacy and Walt
Andrus, have maintained a "wait and see" posture -- at least, in the case
of Andrus, when they weren't gushing about the case being the "most sig-
nificant in history," etc. This schism gave the appearance of signifying a
chill in the usually friendly relationship between the two groups, an
appearance that Schmitt told ParaNet was illusory and unwarranted.
Feud or not, a thaw is most definitely in the air. Shmitt told us
that the problem seems to have been one of miscommunication. "There's a
lot to this case we hadn't seen before," he said. And now, ParaNet has
learned that Jerry Clark has changed his mind and is expressing "support"
for the case.
The turning point seems to be the presentation by Dr. Bruce Maccabee
at the 1988 MUFON Symposium in Lincoln, at which he showed the results
thus far of his photo analysis work. "We can only learn from this case,"
said Maccabee. "If its a hoax, we will learn about a new kind of hoaxer,
one who seeks no notoriety for himself, who is well-established in his
community, who cooperates fully with investigators, even going so far as
to build a special camera mount to our specifications, and who is so con-
fident in his work that he uses a special, sealed 3-D camera provided by
investigators. Obviously, if its real, we will learn a tremendous amount
about the nature of the UFO phenomenon."
Among other things, he had determined the object in at least one
photo to be around 18 feet in diameter and 14 feet tall. Use of the
special dual-camera mount referred to earlier had determined that the
image is not a double exposure. And triangulation of the two images showed
it to be not less than 150 feet from the photographer, out over the bay
that separates Gulf Breeze from the mainland of Florida.
One by one, Maccabee either refuted or clarified objections to the
case raised by, among others, Robert Boyd of CUFOS...27 points in all.
Even Phil Klass was impressed enough to compliment Maccabee, and seemed to
be at a loss for major objections.
In the meantime, Schmitt is not letting MUFON completely off the
hook. He still objects to the comments of some of the principals in the
case, most notably Andrus, Don Ware, and Budd Hopkins. He maintains they
were "hasty" and "unprofessional" in their early exposure of the details
of the reports, and in some of their positive, seemingly over-credulous
comments. And he wishes MUFON had shared some of the more positive details
of the photo-analysis earlier, before either group had published in their
respective journals.
And Jerry Clark? Well, he's changed his mind before. His address at
the symposium was on the return of the nuts-and-bolts theory of UFOs, and
how the "paraphysical" and "psychic" explanations were just cop-outs. This
from a man who had co-written a previous tome, with Loren Coleman, on the
psychic aspects of the UFO phenomenon.
[For the record, the ParaNet rating of the Gulf Breeze case stands
at S5/P5, Highly Strange, Data Unreliable/Probable Hoax; however, whereas
it previously bordered on P1, it is now very close to becoming a P3. Fur-
ther photoanalysis results, if in any way conclusive, will have a great in-
fluence on the rating.]
-----------------------
AND NOW YOU KNOW THE REST OF THE STORY....
Back in June of 1978, a retired Air Force Colonel appeared on TV's
Merv Griffin show to discuss his UFO sighting of 1954, when he was a B-52
pilot. "We were cruising at 10,000 feet when we spotted a target somewhere
around 20,000 to 25,000 feet. It was about seven miles in front of us to
our right, and we were overtaking it. It then started descending across
our flight path, and I decided to check it out. So I advanced power and
began closing a little faster and descending. We kept getting closer and
closer and pretty soon we were within a mile of the object, flying over
trees at 345 MPH."
The plane closed to within an eighth of a mile of the disc-shaped
object. "It was about 60 feet in diameter and 10 or 11 feet thick through
the center," he said. "It had what looked like a titanium-type finish
(silver gray). I pulled up and made a hard turn that put it out of sight
for roughly four seconds. We whipped back to pull up alongside of it and
it wasn't there. I zoomed up to 1500 feet. `There it is!' I said. It was
about 2 miles in front of us going across a field leaving a dusty trail
behind it. I guessed its speed at about 170 MPH." After another dive, the
crew lost sight of the object. "We never saw it again," said Air Force
Colonel William Coleman, former Public Information Officer for Project
Blue Book, who until that broadcast, had emphatically denied that he had
ever had such an experience. [Source: MUFON Journal, June 1988]
----------------------
MJ-12's DAY IN COURT?
The war of words between MJ-12 proponent William Moore and debunker
Phil Klass is heating up. After releasing a venomous attack on Klass' ob-
jections to MJ-12 through his publication, Fair Witness Focus, Moore pub-
lished a similar monograph in the proceedings of the 1988 MUFON Symposium.
Since Moore failed to show for the event, the paper was never delivered,
but Klass responded to the charges of "straight-out lying" and other ob-
fuscations by implying that he would be contacting attorneys about pos-
sible libel charges.
Moore, in the meantime, has sent an open letter to Klass in which he
outlines 19 incidents in which he feels Klass has strained the boundaries
of objective investigation, through the use of "vicious, vituperative at-
tacks," "insinuation," and "innuendo." Moore's major objection is Klass'
alleged implication that he, Moore, may be a willing accomplice to the
forgery of government documents in the MJ-12 affair. For example, in the
December 15, 1987 issue of "Saucer Smear," Klass is quoted as saying in a
letter, "In my opinion, Moore's behavior in the past six months is NOT
that of an innocent victim of somebody else's hoax." (Emphasis in origi-
nal).
Moore ends the letter by demanding of Klass "written acknowledgement
that you do not now and never have possessed proof positive that the...MJ-
12 documents...are fraudulent." Further, he wants Klass to acknowledge
that his public statements were not intended to imply that Moore or any of
his associates were involved in a hoax; and predictably, Moore wants a
written apology. The possibility of legal action is also dangled in
Moore's closing.
Now, would anyone care to speculate on the outcome of a jury trial
in which the MJ-12 documents were the central evidence?
-------------------
AND FINALLY...
ParaNet has learned that a major TV project on UFOs is in the works,
one that is, naturally, hoped to "blow the lid off the whole thing." We
can't be more specific at this time, except to say that parts of it might
actually be done live. (No, Geraldo Rivera is NOT involved).
--Jim Speiser
Press ENTER to Continue:



132
textfiles.com/ufo/insd0888.asc Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
==============
INSIDE UFOLOGY
August 1988
==============
TENSIONS MOUNT OVER GULF BREEZE
ParaNet Alpha 08/10 -- Depending on whom one chooses to believe,
Gulf Breeze gadfly investigator Robert D. Boyd was/was not
kicked out of MUFON.
Boyd, who had concurrent titles of Investigations Coordinator
for CUFOS and Alabama State Director for MUFON, was definitely
asked to resign from the latter organization by its chief,
Walter Andrus. But in a July 14th press release, first picked up
by James Moseley's Saucer Smear, Boyd claimed that Andrus
informed him "that he was no longer a member of MUFON." Andrus
flatly denied the charge, saying "the subject never came up."
Andrus, in a phone conversation from MUFON headquarters in
Seguin, TX, told ParaNet that Boyd had been told to resign due
to "unprofessional investigative techniques" in his work on the
Gulf Breeze, FL, photographic case. He said he had asked Boyd to
come along on the investigation last January, as a gesture of
cooperation between the two organizations; but that since that
time, Boyd had conducted a "smear campaign" against "Mr. Ed,"
the chief witness in the case. Andrus said Boyd had "gone off
half-cocked," going on talk shows as a MUFON representative with
faulty and downright false information about the case. "I
demanded his resignation, and he refused," said Andrus. "I
relieved him of his duties [as State Director] anyway. But I
never told him he was out of the organization." Simple MUFON
membership consists mainly of a subscription to the
organization's Journal.
"I'm telling you that he lied to you," said Boyd in response.
"What's in my [release] is just what happened." Boyd's release
expresses "complete disgust" with the Gulf Breeze investigation,
and cites "suppression of all facts, collaboration between
investigators and/or witnesses, and a four-month campaign to
discredit [me]." In a phone call, Boyd cited further instances
of what he called "shoddy" techniques on the part
of the primary investigators, Charles Flannigan, Donald Ware,
and Andrus. In one conversation, Boyd asked Flannigan
if one of the photos turned out to be a hoax, would it destroy
the case in their minds? "ALL the photos would have to be proven
hoaxes," Boyd quotes Flannigan as saying.
Boyd still has the support of the Hynek Center, according to Don
Schmitt, one of CUFOS' directors. And the Center is none too
thrilled with an article in the latest MUFON Journal, in which
Andrus made it sound as if CUFOS members were on bended knee,
begging for forgiveness for having written several anti-Gulf
Breeze articles. He charged that Schmitt, George
Eberhard and others had "unwittingly accepted the distorted
information supplied" by Boyd. He claimed that the two seemed
"shocked by revelations of the truth," referring to information
Andrus provided them at the MUFON Symposium at Lincoln.
"Obviously," says Andrus, "they were embarrased for the
premature article in the CUFOS Bulletin and the International
UFO Reporter."
"Nonsense," says Schmitt. "Obviously, there is a lot of
information in this case, and some of it we have not been privy
to. But we stand fully behind our basic premise, which is that
of calling for an independent investigation and analysis of the
evidence by a non-UFO entity, such as a government agency."
Ware said that such an analysis might be in the works, but
declined to give details.
"We also still decry the premature publicity given the case by
MUFON, and the premature declarations of authenticity" by such
people as Andrus, Budd Hopkins and Donald Ware. "This case
stands or falls on the evidence, and the evidence isn't all in
yet."
Generally, reaction to Boyd's alleged removal from the ranks of
MUFON was surprise. "Does this mean we all have to agree with
Walt in order to keep our positions?", one MUFON officer asked.
"I thought this was a scientific organization."
But Andrus was unruffled. "My action [regarding Boyd] was due to
his spreading false and grossly irresponsible information about
Ed in the name of MUFON. I would never ask anyone to resign
simply because they didn't agree with me. But we have a certain
standard of responsible investigation that needs to be adhered
to."
Boyd, in the meantime, is continuing to "research" the case from
his home in Mobile, Alabama. He says he is offering copies of
all his Gulf Breeze correspondence to anyone interested, for a
small fee to cover copying and postage. And he continues to be
outspoken about his conviction that "Mr. Ed" is a hoaxer. "I'm
95% convinced that this is bogus," he muses. "But I'm willing to
leave the other 5% open, just in case."
<<>>
COMMENTS:
Initially, I praised Boyd for expressing the same reservations I
had with the GB case. But as one independent researcher asked
me, rather plaintively, "What exactly is it that Boyd is
pointing to, regarding the evidence itself, that makes him say
its a hoax?" I had to agree, Boyd's main contentions are with
the quality of the investigation and the attitudes of the
investigators. He points out very little with regard to the
photographs, deferring instead to Dr. Willy Smith of UNICAT, who
published one paper critical of the case. Part of that paper was
based on weather information supplied by Ray Stanford, which was
later discredited.
Boyd also points to gaps in our knowledge of Mr. Ed's
background, and rather freely bandies about the suggestion that
Ed has done hard time at some point in the past. He offers no
evidence except hearsay. I believe I was not supposed to print
that; but then, Boyd didn't know me from Adam, and therefore he
was not supposed to say that. It may very well be an example of
the "irresponsibility" Andrus spoke of.
As Boyd said, there's politics, ego, and wishful thinking at
work here. However, without solid evidence, we have not the
slightest reason to call this an outright hoax.
As the independent researcher said, poor investigative
techniques "are not Ed's fault." However, without a high
standard of investigative thoroughness, we have not the
slightest reason to call this "proof of extraterrestrial
visitation."
Our ParaNet rating remains: S5/P2.


159
textfiles.com/ufo/insd0988.asc Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
==============
INSIDE UFOLOGY
September 1988
==============
GULF BREEZE UPDATE
ParaNet Alpha 09/14 -- There seems to be no end in sight to the
turmoil being stirred up by the already-legendary Gulf Breeze,
FL photographic case. If the matter were settled tomorrow one
way or the other, it will still take years to repair the rifts
it has caused in many ufological camps.
Several resignations have reportedly come in the wake of Walt
Andrus' firing of Robert Boyd. At least one, that of National
Public Information Director Marge Christensen of Tucson, was
headed off at the last minute by Andrus, who reportedly promised
her he would cease and desist from further "unscientific"
statements in the MUFON Journal, which statements implied
all-out endorsement of the case as real. In the monthly MUFON
Newsletter, a semi-private organ circulated to State Directors
and other key researchers, Christensen complained of being
"dismayed by what I consider to be unprofessional and certainly
unscientific conduct...and comments in print...in regard to
speculation about privately held views of members of CUFOS." But
after speaking with Andrus and Deputy Director Dan Wright,
Christensen agreed to a leave of absence until after the
November Presidential elections. But privately, she holds out
little hope of rejoining the organization. "Walt seems bound and
determined to make this case a cause celebre," she told ParaNet.
"I hope he is really listening to reason, and not just
sweet-talking me to keep me in MUFON."
But other resignations may follow. Richard Hall, Deputy Director
for Publications and author of the recent "Uninvited Guests,"
told ParaNet he is "spearheading a campaign" to get MUFON to
look more closely at its Gulf Breeze investigation, and to be
more responsible in its public statements about the case. Hall,
one of Ufology's savviest practitioners, reportedly called for
an "extraordinary meeting of the Board" of MUFON via
Teleconference, and it is said he will resign if the group
continues its present course. According to various sources, that
course may include a major media thrust in the near future,
possibly including a press conference timed to coincide with the
upcoming TV documentaries that will showcase the UFO situation.
At least one of those documentaries, the NBC program "Unsolved
Mysteries," to air on October 5th, is said to be "very pro-Gulf
Breeze." The other will apparently be more balanced, but one of
the producers of that program, Tracy Torme, is very taken with
the case. "I went there [to Gulf Breeze] 85% convinced that its
real, and after talking to Ed for two days, I'm now 99%
convinced. I'm leaving the door open for the slight possibility
that all of the witnesses, including Ed's wife and teenage
daughter, are lying." Torme will appear in a live nationwide
computer conference on CompuServe Sept. 18th.
In other developments:
- UFO debunker Phil Klass got wind of the fact that ParaNet was
snooping around to find out whether CSICOP was behind the Gulf
Breeze affair. He called us to deny any knowledge of such a
"constructive hoax." "Certainly CSICOP has nothing to do with it,
and, while [fellow debunker Amazing] Randi DOES live down there,
I highly doubt he has anything to do with it either."
- Klass has found a flaw in one of the photos that may be
significant. While a streetlight in the shot can plainly be seen to
be blurred in such a way as to indicate camera movement, the UFO
remains perfectly focused and sharp-edged. Photoanalyst Bruce
Maccabee explains that Ed was "tracking" the moving object with
the camera; however, Klass doubts that such can be done so
clearly with a one-second time exposure in low ambient light.
- ParaNet spoke with the Mayor of Gulf Breeze, the honorable
Edward Grey. Grey, a long-time friend of "Mr. Ed," the main
percipient, claims the whole thing is a hoax. "Ed is a heck of a
nice guy, very charming, but it is totally consistent with his
personality to pull off a stunt like this." When asked if it was
also consistent with the personalities of Mrs. Ed or Ed's
daughter, the Mayor replied, "Well, I wouldn't know about that."
When asked about the other 135 witnesses reported to have seen
the object, Grey is doubtful. "When you have a lot of publicity
attached to something like this, people are bound to look up in
the sky and report any strange thing. They may have seen UFOs,
but to my knowledge no one is seeing or experiencing the things
that Ed is supposedly seeing. And in all this time, no one on
Ed's block has seen a thing." The Mayor seemed unaware that Ed's
across-the-street neighbors have reportedly had a sighting of an
object very similar to Ed's -- despite the fact that they don't
know that their neighbor Ed is the famous UFO witness being
talked about.
- Grey complained that neither of the two documentaries had been
in touch with his office. Nor, for that matter, had any of the
MUFON investigators. We understand now, however, that the
producers of "UFO COVER-UP" (Oct. 14th) have made an appointment
to interview the Mayor live during that broadcast (partially,
perhaps, at our urging).
For some undefinable reason, it seems many people are looking to
October, the month of the TV expose's, as the time when the case
will be resolved. Perhaps because it would be a perfect time for
a debunker, or Ed himself, to jump up and yell "Gotcha!" Or
perhaps because, with the increased scrutiny such national
exposure will bring, a competent investigator will stumble
across the "string in the photos" -- or the smoking gun that
shows it to be genuine. Whatever the reason, the general feeling
seems to be that this "can't go on much longer."
MORE ON THE OCT. 14TH EXPOSE'
Although we have been in constant contact with the producers of
"UFO COVER-UP: LIVE," sad to say we cannot divulge much of what
we have been told. We can, however, pass along two exclusive
tid-bits. First, a host has been chosen: it is Mike Farrell, he
who portrayed B.J. Hunnicut in the "M*A*S*H" TV series.
Second, one particularly fascinating segment will feature a live
interview with Col. William Coleman of Indian Harbor, FL. Col.
Coleman is a retired Air Force bomber pilot and former Public
Information Officer of Project Blue Book. As reported in this
column two months ago, Col. Coleman is also a witness to a
high-strangeness UFO encounter, back in the early fifties -- an
encounter he was forced, by dint of his position, to DENY for
many years. Sit back and think for a second...a former Air Force
Officer, once charged with custody of the government's public
UFO study, will go on the record as having sighted a metallic,
saucer-shaped object that maneuvered at speeds of up to 25,000
mph. And he will do it ON LIVE TV TO A NATIONWIDE AUDIENCE. Is
the dam starting to break?
MEANWHILE, BACK AT MJ-12...
Citizens Against UFO Secrecy is going to print an item in their next
issue dealing with Prof. Ronald Westcott. You may recall that
Westcott is the highly-touted "linguistics analyst" from
Princeton who checked out the Eisenhower Briefing Document (the
main MJ-12 document) and concluded it could indeed have been
written by the Admiral. The Moore team, which is pushing the
documents as possibly real, made a big to-do about Westcott's
credentials and impartiality. Well, the credentials are in
place, but according to the CAUS story, the impartiality may be
in question. Westcott's name is alleged to be connected with
Brad Steiger's Star People movement, and supposedly he has
written on several New Age issues in the past.
Stan Friedman is not impressed, however. "I recall [Westcott]
writing some less-than-complimentary things about the ET
Hypothesis," says the MJ-12 researcher. He also told us that the
Hillenkoetter document is now in the hands of a questioned
documents analyst, for further verification.
--Jim Speiser


185
textfiles.com/ufo/insidevolt.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
From: density4@cts.com (White Galactic World-Bridger)
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.research,alt.conspiracy
Subject: BENTWATERS SOLDIER SAW INSIDE SUPER-SECRET VAULT
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 1995 03:41:41 GMT
Organization: CTS Network Services
Lines: 175
Message-ID: <4c50nl$j18@news2.cts.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: density4.cts.com
Xref: helix.net alt.alien.visitors:23269 alt.paranet.ufo:12187 alt.alien.research:5285 alt.conspiracy:24501
BENTWATERS SOLDIER SAW INSIDE SUPER-SECRET VAULT
Base Was Site of Famous UFO Events in 1980
by Michael Lindemann
The military base known as RAF Bentwaters in England is
associated with one of the most impressive yet controversial UFO
cases of all time. Almost no one disputes that something
strange occurred near the base during late December of 1980, but
what it was remains shrouded in mystery. Odd moving lights were
reported in the sky and in the Rendlesham Forest that separates
Bentwaters from its nearby sister base (now closed) called RAF
Woodbridge. Soldiers were dispatched into the woods, led by Lt.
Colonel Charles Halt, USAF. (Though on British soil, both
bases were manned by American forces).
On January 13, 1981, Halt sent a classified memo regarding the
events to the British Ministry of Defence. That memo, released
to U.S. UFO researcher Robert Todd in June of 1983 through
the Freedom of Information Act, says that several witnesses
reported a triangular, metallic, highly luminous object either
hovering or standing on legs, and then maneuvering through the
forest, on the night of December 27. Though not a witness to
this object himself, Halt said that the next morning he did
witness three depressions in the ground, arranged in a
triangular pattern, that apparently marked where the object had
stood. Halt further stated that on the following night he and
others witnessed an astounding display of moving lights in the
sky.
Halt's memo left little doubt that whatever happened was out of
the ordinary, but continuing efforts by independent researchers
have not resolved the Bentwaters mystery, and current opinions
vary widely. Some now believe the strange events were all
staged as part of a very elaborate psychological warfare test,
possibly involving mind-control techniques. Others say craft of
unknown origin were seen at close range, and that extensive
photo and physical evidence was gathered at the site -- all of
which was then locked away in government vaults. Still others
say not only craft but "aliens" were seen and contacted.
Finally, there are the hard-line skeptics who say nothing at all
remarkable happened, except that airmen who should know better
mistook the light of a nearby lighthouse in the fog for
something otherworldly.
Now CNI News has learned of a U.S. soldier who was stationed
at Bentwaters some years after the famous 1980 events, but who
saw several things that lend strong credence to the strange
claims associated with the base. This soldier prefers that his
name not be used in this story, but he has communicated under
his own name with CNI News editor Michael Lindemann.
Concerning his military background, the soldier says: "I entered
the service in 1983 and was assigned to RAF Bentwaters in 1984.
I was involved in nuclear weapons and because of our extensive
background investigations, members of our section were often
called upon to do other high-security details. Since even the
Security Police didn't have as high a clearence, a lot of these
details were simply being our own guards -- hence my access to
the vault (see below). I volunteered for as many of these
details as I could because it was supposed to create an
impressive military record. However, when I arrived at my next
base (I left Bentwaters late in '86) no records of my special
duties followed me. I called my immediate supervisor when I
discovered this and he said, 'What happens at Bentwaters stays
at Bentwaters.' I think this had more to do with security than
UFOs. I was an enlisted man and I was an E-4 Sgt when I entered
the vault. I left the service in 1988. I was still angry that
none of my record followed me. I simply didn't re-enlist and
had an honorable discharge. I was still an E-4."
Here is the soldier's account of his extraordinary experience
in "the vault" at Bentwaters, where apparently something very
interesting and very secret is hidden.
"On RAF Bentwaters there is a secured area around the flightline.
This is normal and many people have access, but not all. Inside
this area is another secured area containing the munitions dump.
Again, this is normal; fewer people have access to this. On this
particular base there is another weapons storage area that only a
few people can get in. You are searched and must travel around
in pairs inside this area. It is heavily guarded. The bunkers
in this area require an elaborate key and password sequence to get
in. One particular bunker is different.
"Inside this bunker is a vault with two combinations and two locks.
Because of regulations, no one person can have access to more than
one [combination or lock]. Hence, if you can get a key you won't
get the combo, or vice-versa. It takes four people to open the
door -- plus the security team verifying passwords, etc. This is
the most secure area I have ever seen in the Air Force.
"I was picked to be a key holder, which meant that I was armed, and
told to escort the individual who needed [access to] the vault,
along with the three others needed to open the door. I don't know
who the individual was; he was American and a civilian. We opened
the door and I at first couldn't believe it. It contained a
roughly-made shelf made out of two-by-fours holding two old wooden
crates. The individual opened one of the crates, which was only
sealed with a lead seal, and inside was a green styrofoam container
in two halves. He opened it up and inside was a rod about a quarter
inch in diameter and bent about three times along its length. It
looked solid and if it were straight it would be about a foot long.
It was dull but corrosion free from what I could tell. The man
looked at it for about a minute, then put it away and resealed the
box with a new lead seal.
"For his minute we spent about four hours preparing to open the
vault. It is that secure.
"That was when I started asking questions about why a small rod
would require so much security. The underlings such as me hadn't
a clue, but when I started asking others I was told not to
worry about it. One officer that I knew personally once said
under his breath that it was 'proof,' but when I pressed him he
denied saying it. The only other response I got, from people
who obviously didn't know, [was] that it probably had something
to do with all the UFOs that supposedly visit the base."
This soldier has no doubt that he saw something very extraordinary
in that vault, but he was highly skeptical of a UFO connection
until he had his own amazing sighting at Bentwaters some time
later. Here is his account.
"I was working nights and for once the sky above the base was
clear. I took an astronomy class in college and was testing my
knowledge of the constellations when I saw what looked like an
equilateral triangle. Of all the constellations, none I could
think of formed a triangle with such bright stars. I had been
looking and thinking for about five or ten minutes when, right
when I was looking directly at them, the stars turned a full
circle, each ending up where they started, and then shot out at
90 degree angles from the direction they were moving, and within
a second were gone over the horizon, each going a different
direction. Because they were just points of light I figured
they were far away and that would make their speed something
incredible. I was so shook up I took the rest of the night off
and for weeks had this nightmare that all the stars in the sky
were spinning, and thus the end of the universe was near. That
may sound strange, but it was that disturbing."
It is interesting to compare this soldier's sighting with
Colonel Halt's eyewitness description of events on December 28,
1980. Halt wrote in his memo: "Three star-like objects were
noticed in the sky, two objects to the north and one to the
south, all of which were about 10 degrees off the horizon. The
objects moved rapidly in sharp angular movements and displayed
red, green and blue lights. The objects to the north appeared
to be elliptical through an 8-12 power lens. They then turned
to full circles. The objects to the north remained in the sky
for an hour or more. The object to the south was visible for
two or three hours and beamed down a stream of light from time
to time."
=================================================================
"In all times and all places, with the possible exception of
Western Europe for the past two hundred years, a social commerce
between human beings and various types of discarnate entities,
or non-human intelligences, was taken for granted."
-Terence McKenna
=================================================================
Excerpt from:
CNI News - Volume 13.7
December 28, 1995
Published by the ISCNI News Center
Editor: Michael Lindemann
ISCNI@aol.com
ISCNI encourages you to respond to stories in CNI News.
Private responses can be emailed to ISCNI@aol.com,
subj: CNI News Editor

239
textfiles.com/ufo/intro.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
INTRODUCTION
------------
The "open society" and "the free exchange of ideas" are generally
regarded not only as praiseworthy ideals but as indelible characteristics
of twentieth-century Western democracy. Their concomitants, freedom of
speech and the press, are held to be rights the infringement of which
places in jeopardy all other democratic liberties, for it is only through
freedom of expression that the citizenry of a democratic state can reach
an informed consensus.
Thus the fate of this book and the ordeal of its author, Judge
Wihelm Staglich, is a telling indictment of the Federal Republic of
Germany's imposture as a sovereign democracy. No less is the silence of
those Western circles which so loudly profess devotion to freedom of
expression in other cases a condemnation of their own hypocrisy, for there
are few if any parallels in the recent history of democratic states for the
sustained hounding and persecution which Judge Staglich has endured over
the past twenty years.
Judge Staglich is unfortunate enough to have trusted his own powers
of observation and to have refused to muzzle himself when the issue was not
only historical truth, but the honor of his country. For, having been
stationed near the Auschwitz concentration camp during Second World War, in
which he served as an officer in an anti-aircraft unit, he made so bold
after the war, when his dismembered fatherland was being re-educated in its
various parts to execrate the allegedly unique wickedness of its conduct,
to remark on his own observations of the camp, which divergeed considerably
from the horror stories which became the staple of Germany's post-war
"mastering of the past".
In 1965 Staglich, who was serving as a judge in Hamburg, was
denounced by a colleague to the Jewish mayor of the city as a "Nazi" for
his heretical remarks on Auschwitz. Judge Staglich then underwent a
two-year "disciplinary proceeding" aimed at driving him from the bench,
which included an obligatory "psychiatric evaluation".
This first effort to silence Judge Staglich, which failed for lack
of evidence, served rather to goad than to intimate the courageous jurist.
In 1973 he published an account of his Auschwitz observations in the
magazine NATION EUROPA. Staglich's public challenge to the official version
of life at Auschwitz brought forth a succession of measures aping those of
the modern totalitarian states, and making a sad mockery of the proud
struggle for freedom of expression and inquiry waged by German academics in
the preceding century and a half.
Judge Staglich was the subject of a second inquisition by which he
was induced to resign, his health having been affected by the campaign
against him. The proceeding was continued, however, with the object of
scripping Staglich of his pension (the authorities eventually settled on
reducing the judge's pension by twenty percent over a fire-year period).
Prematurely retired, Staglich set to work on a systematic study of
the evidence supposedly substantiating systematic murder by gassing at
Auschwitz , a study to which he brought juristic experience unique in the
Revisionist movement. This book, the fruit of those researches, is the most
comprehensive examination of the various "proofs" offered for the Auschwitz
myth, as well as a damning analysis of the several post-war trials staged
by the Allied victors and their fuglemen in the Federal Republic, most
notably the famous "Auschwitz Trial" which took place in Frankfurt in
1963-1965.
The appearance of DER AUSCHWITZ MYTHOS in West Germany in 1979
spurred the custodians of the myth of Germany's solitary and monstrous
guilt in the war to new excesses in censorship. West German authorities set
in motion the procedure by which offending books are "indexed" as "harmful
to youth", thereby severely restricting their advertising and distribution.
Nevertheless, all but seven of the 10,000 copies of the first edition had
been sold by the time the book was ordered seized as a result of further
legal action by the government.
In a crowning absurdity, Judge Staglich was "deprived" of the
doctoral degree he had earned at the University of Gottingen in 1951. In
this action the university authorities had recourse to a law signed
personally by the late Fuhrer and Reichskanzler, Adolf Hitler, to all of
whose values and practices the Federal Republic proclaims itself a standing
reproach. A series of other harassments, from police raids on Judge
Staglich's home to seize forbidden literature to the enactment of a
constitutional provision aimed at those who dare to question the
"Holocaust", has followed.
It would tax the powers of belief of even the least
conspirational-minded to imagine that there was something adventitious or
arbitrary about the actions of West German authorities, which have been
undertaken under "conservative" and "social democratic" regimes alike.
Their activities, carried out with unswerving purpose against one man and
his ideas for more than twenty years, give abundant evidence that the
maintenance of orthodoxy on the statemandated "Holocaust" tale is far more
important than is the maintenance of even lip service to freedom of
expression and inquiry.
As Wilhelm Staglich has written:
" ...We Germans, in spite of the repeated assurances to the
contrary of our puppet politicians, are politically and
intellectually no longer a sovereign nation since our defeat in
the Second World War. Our political subservience, which is
apparent in the fact of the breaking up of the Reich and the
incorporation of the individual pieces into the extant power
blocks of the East and of the West, has had as its consequence a
corresponding intellectual subservience. Escape from this
intellectual subservience is prevented primarly by the guilt
complex inculcated in most Germans through the "re-education"
instituted in 1945. This guilt complex is based primarily on the
Holocaust legend. Therefore for us Germans the struggle against
what I have called the 'Auschwitz Myth' is so frightfully
important. "
The suppresion of DER AUSCHWITZ MYTHOS in West Germany, however, is
less than even a Pyrrhic victory for the world-wide forces which strive to
impose a one-sided, propagandistic history of the Second World War, a
history which has as its central motif the "Holocaust" hoax. It is rather
humiliating acknowledgement of their inability to confront modern
Revisionism according to the canons of scholarship, an inability that has
manifested itself in the Holocaust Establishment's attempts to suppress the
writings of scholars such as Arthur Butz and Robert Faurisson.
The appearance of this translation of THE AUSCHWITZ MYTH under the
auspices of the Institute for Historical Review, indeed, confers upon the
Staglich affair the aspect of triumph and victory. A little more that two
years after the Institute's headquarters were reduced to a heap of ashes
and rubble by a terrorist attack, the English-speaking world has gained
access to this vital Revisionist work. The work of "bringing history into
accord with the facts" goes on; ultimately, there is no power on earth
which will stop it.
Theodore J. O'Keefe
December, 1986
FOREWORD
--------
"Auschwitz - it was hell". For all its subjectivity, this remark
attributed to a former inmate does not begin to characterize the
emotion-charged ideas the word Auschwitz evokes today. Auschwitz symbolizes
more than the multitudinous agonies suffered in concentration camps, not
only German camps during the war, but concentration camps everywhere, past
and present: It has come to symbolize the "murder of millions of European
Jews". Everyone "knows" that we are not "supposed to" voice the slightest
doubt regarding the legend that is Auschwitz, or even relate personal
experiences that might not be entirely in line with it. Indeed, to commit
such heresy is to run the risk of losing one's livelihood. For the powers
that be have ordained that Auschwitz must be viewed in one way only.
That is exactly what should make us leery. Truth does not require
coercion to be accepted. Its persuasiveness does not depend on constant
repetition of bold-faced claims. All that is really needed for truth to
prevail is to show the facts, and let common sense to the rest.
What then could be more natural than to examine the factual basis
of the allegation that Auschwitz was the site of the most extensive and
atrocious massacre of Jews in history? Almost everybody is familiar with
this claim, but nobody can say just what evidence there is to support it.
People have come to regard the whole subject as taboo. I noticed this was
true even of the judges who imposed a relatively harsh penalty on me for my
having published, in the form of an open letter, a de visu account of
the Auschwitz parent camp that conflicts with the now current picture of
Auschwitz.
When I wrote that letter, it was far from my intention to dispute
the extermination thesis per se. Anyway, that would have been outside the
scope of my account. However, the reaction it provoked made me realize for
the first time what importance the powers that have for decades been
determining our destiny as a nation place on the Auschwitz taboo. That
realization awakened in me an irresistable urge to research the historical
sources for the allegation that Auschwitz was an "extermination camp", and
come to grips with it. I believe my findings deserve to be brought to the
attention of the general public.
At the outset, let one thing be noted: Contrary to popular belief,
Auschwitz was not a single camp under central administration. Rather, it
consisted of a number of individual camps of various sizes, some of which
had considerable organizational autonomy. The actual Auschwitz camp -the so
called Stammlager ("parent camp" or "main camp", also known as Auschwitz I)
- was situated about 2 km southwest of the town of Auschwitz in Upper
Silesia. Not this camp, but the Birkenau camp, located about 3 km west of
the town, is supposed to have been the site of the extermination of the
Jews. There was a series of other camps in the Auschwitz region, some of
which had been established for special purposes, such as Raisko, for
agricultural experiments, and Monowitz, for the production of synthetic
rubber. All these camps were associated, more or less loosely, with the
main camp. Thus it is hardly correct to designate "Auschwitz" as an
"extermination camp", pure and simple, as people often do, perhaps from
ignorance. Basically, "Auschwitz" was a network of labor camps established
in the industrial area of Upper Silesia for the German war economy. The
Birkenau camp ("Auschwitz II"), which is the focal point of the
extermination claims, served primarily as an internment camp for specific
groups of prisoners, such as Gypsies, women with children, as well as the
chronically ill and those who were otherwise incapable of labor. It also
served as a transit camp and, initially, even as a POW camp. In the spring
of 1943, several crematoria -allegedly containing "gas chambers" for the
extermination of Jews- were put into operation there, while the original
camp crematorium in "Auschwitz I" was shut down in July 1943.
The real subject of our investigation is the charge that Birkenau
was an "extermination camp". This work is not intended to give a definitive
picture of Auschwitz -something that would, in any case, be beyond the
limited resources at my disposal. It also has no pretensions to being a
"Geschichtsschau" in the Ranken sense, that is an attempt to depict
Auschwitz "as it really was". Rather, it is an effort to survey, examine,
and assess as objectively as possible the evidence that has thus far been
presented for the claim that Auschwitz was a "death factory".
Unfortunately, the Institut fur Zeitgeschichte [Institute for
Contemporary History] in Munich has not seen fit to grant my request for
its assistance. My correspondence with the institute is so revealing that I
must share it with my readers (see Appendix III). Likewise, I was refused
permission to examine relevant trial records (see Appendices IV and V), and
therefore had to rely on published collections of trial documents, such as
they exist.
I am aware, of course, that Auschwitz is not the only camp that has
been linked to the "extermination of the Jews". Nevertheless, it assumes
such importance in this connection, both qualitatively and quantitatively,
that I am convinced that the extermination thesis stands or falls with the
allegation that Auschwitz was a "death factory". That alone should justify
my restricting the scope of this inquiry.
Finally, let it be noted that the present volume is the work not of
a professional historian, but of a jurist with an interest in recent
history. Naturally, I have tried to observe the rules of scholarship. My
intention is not to polemicize, but to take stock of the evidence that has
thus far been presented for the claim that Auschwitz was a "death factory",
as objectively as possible, and draw the logical conclusions from it. If
certain passages in this work strike the reader as polemical, he would do
well to ask himself whether such lapses are not unavoidable given the
nature of the subject.
Dr. Wilhelm Staglich
Hamburg, December 1978.


56
textfiles.com/ufo/intruderrev.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
TITLE: INTRUDERS
AUTHOR: Budd Hopkins
PUBLISHED BY: Random House
AT: New York, 1987
PAGES: 223, 8 photo (Hardback Edition)VIEWPOINT: Fortean=====================================================
It's late in the evening when a sudden and bizarre compulsion comes over
you to get some junk food at the local fast service establishment. Donning
attire sufficient to make you presentable at the local Seven-Eleven you
slip into your auto and begin your trek to satiate your hunger. And trek
it becomes! Not two miles from you home, along a dark segment of the
roadway you spot strange lights in the sky - headed on a direct intercept
path with your car. Your engine dies and the car glides to a halt. Mist
surrounds the car but you can dimly see some movement as a short form
approaches. Then you see it. A non-human creature with large "compelling"
eyes, huge head and little or no mouth gestures in your direction. You
attempt to scream but try as you might you cannot summon any movement from
your own body. You are somehow extracted from the car and teleported into
the hovering craft....
And so begins a typical scenario reported in the best-selling book by
author/artist Budd Hopkins. If you are into fantasy and science fiction
then this book is NOT for you. Yes, I said NOT as Budd Hopkins is relating
an account of a life experience. An experience very real to Kathy Davis,
the subject of his work "Intruders."
"Intruders" reports one bizarre account after another of the intrusion of
intelligent alien beings into the life of Kathy Davis. Her case began in
early childhood and continues into the future of herself and her children.
Even, it seems, to a child which is a hybrid between herself and the
alien beings. Only recently made aware of the experiences through the aid
of hypnotic regression, Kathy's story is perhaps one of the best documented
case events of this type. These happenings were first seriously reported
in the mid/late sixties by John G. Fuller in "The Interrupted Journey" and
most recently by Whitley Strieber in "Communion." Hopkins' new work
contributes much to the investigative reputation of the whole Abduction
Phenomenon. While Mr. Hopkin's literary style is not as polished and
refined as that of Whitley Strieber, this work is the first of its kind to
couple good investigative reporting technique with a sense of drama
that keeps the book in your hands and your eyes on its pages until it is
consumed. "Intruders" will intrude on your imagination and have you
looking over your shoulder any time you find yourself alone ... and in the
dark. "Intruders" will both scare you and infuriate you as you consider
the possibilities of a race of creatures taking liberties with humans not
seen since the days of Hitler.
Intruders. Get it. Read it. But be don't be surprised if you find that
this book conjures up strange and elusive memories. You wouldn't be the
first to have this book awaken memories, here-to-fore hidden from your
conscious mind, of a night of terror.
by Ted Markley
IEWPOINT: Fortean=====================================================
It's late in the evening when a sudden and bizarre


1186
textfiles.com/ufo/inv_edge.txt Normal file
View File

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

74
textfiles.com/ufo/ipu.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
======================================================================
<<UFONET I>> * 416-237-1204 * PC-Pursuitable * File Requestable * HST
* 24 Hour Operation * Sysop - Tom Mickus * Toronto * FREE
======================================================================
======================================================================
STEIN1.TXT - Text file that was scanned and processed via OCR by
^^^^^^^^^^^^ Harvey Stewart [UFONET I] .
The file was run through the Microsoft Word 5.0 spell
checker following conversion so most errors in character
recognition should be ok. Now that I finally have OCR
software that works there should be lots of files on the
way so stay tuned.
Do you have important material that needs to be shared?
Contact us here at UFONET I and perhaps we can convert
your document to a text file for you using our OCR
software and hardware. You can contact either myself
Harvey Stewart or the Sysop of this board Tom Mickus
for details.
======================================================================
======================================================================
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Office of The Assistant Chief Of Staff For Intelligence
Washington D.C. 20310
May 16, 1984
Freedom of Information Office
Mr. William S. Steinman
15043 Rosalita Drive
La Mirada, California 90638
Dear Mr. Steinman :
This is in response to your letter of May 8, 1984, in
which you request information concerning "The Interplanetary
Phenomenon Unit of the Scientific and Technical Branch of
Army counterintelligence Directorate, DA. "Your letter was
received in this office on May 15, 1984 .
As you note in your letter, the so-called Interplanetary
Phenomenon Unit ( IPU ) was disestablished and, as far as we
are aware, all records, if any, Were transferred to the Air
Force in the late 1950's . The "unit was formed as an in-
house project purely as an interest item for the Assistant
Chief of Staff for Intelligence . It was never a "unit" in
the military sense, nor was it ever formally organized or
reportable, it had no investigative function, mission or
authority, and may not even have had any formal records at
all, It is only through institutional memory that any
recollection exists of this unit. We are therefore Unable
to answer your questions as to the exact purpose of the
unit, exactly when it was disestablished, or who was in command
this last would not apply in any case, as no one was
in command ". We have no records or documentation of any
kind on this unit, "Also, it is Very unlikely that there
was any relationship between xxxxxxxxxx and the IPU, but
only xxxxxxxxxxxxx could answer that question.
I regret that we are unable to be of more assistance in
this matter.
Sincerely,
Lance R. Cornine
Lieutenant Colonel, General Staff
Director of Counterintelligence


52
textfiles.com/ufo/jalconf.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (UPI) -- An extensive investigation by the Federal
Aviation Administration was "unable to support" the Nov. 17 sighting by
Japanese flyers of UFOs near their plane, but no evidence was found to
contradict the report.
The final FAA report on the incident also includes transcripts of the
pilot's statement about the sighting saying the huge objects with
blinking lights vanished into the moonlight when a second plane arrived
in the area.
"The FAA does not have enough material to say something was there,"
FAA spokesman Paul Stucke said. "We are accepting the description of the
crew but are unable to support what they saw."
The FAA report, made public Thursday, included radar tapes and
transcripts of interviews with the crew of the Japanese commercial jet
and air traffic controllers.
No evidence was found to contradict the crew, but the agency did say
an unexplained radar image seen by three controllers that seemed to
confirm the sighting was actually a split image of the Japan Air Lines
cargo plane.
The UFOs were spotted by the JAL crew when they entered Alaskan air
space on a flight that began in Iceland. Crew members saw two belts of
lights three miles ahead that hovered almost stationary, then shifted
from side-to-side and rapidly pulsed across the sky.
"... Most unexpectedly two space ships stopped in front of our face,
shooting off lights," said pilot Kenju Terauchi. "The inside cockpit
shined brightly and I felt warm in the face."
Later, above Fairbanks, Terauchi saw "a silhouette of a gigantic
spaceship" and obtained controllers' permission to make a series of
turns to "run away quickly." He said the object stayed with the
aircraft.
Controllers directed a United Airlines plane to intersect the
aircraft path, but Terauchi said, "When the United plane came by our
side, the spaceship disappeared suddenly and there was nothing but the
light of the moon."
It was the third UFO sighting of Terauchi's 29-year career as a
pilot.
Copilot Takanori Tamefuja and engineer Woshio Tsukupa said the
November UFO sighting was their first.
Tsukupa saw white and amber colored lights that glowed with a strange
intensity "that I cannot describe ... not even in Japanese."
Tamefuji saw the first series of lights but could not make out the
UFO over Fairbanks because it was on the captain's side of the cockpit.
However, he said an object showed on the plane's radar.
The FAA also released a report of a UFO sighting Jan. 29 picked up on
radar by the crew of an Alaska Airlines passenger plane over McGrath.
The crew, flying at 35,000 feet, reported a radar target moving in
front of the plane at 300 miles a minute but quickly lost track of it.
The agency could not confirm that radar sighting because it did not
have ground radar in the area.
<<>>


736
textfiles.com/ufo/jinns.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,736 @@
======================================================================
<<UFONET I>> * 416-237-1204 * PC-Pursuitable * File Requestable * HST
* 24 Hour Operation * Sysop - Tom Mickus * Toronto * FREE
======================================================================
======================================================================
JINNS.TXT - The True Nature Of UFO Entities -G.C. (FSR, 33/3) (SEP/88)
- FSR Editor, Gordon Creighton
- To Subscribe: Annual Subscription, 4 Issues.
United Kingdom: 12 Pounds Sterling
United States: $30 US (Money Order)
Other Countries: 15 Pounds Sterling
AIRMAIL: USA add $10, Others 6 Pounds
- Address: The Editor,
FSR Publications Ltd,
P.O. Box 12,
Snodland, Kent
ME6 5JZ, ENGLAND
======================================================================
Note: Italicized words are indicted by CAPITALIZATION such as this.
Footnotes are represented as "*1*". In this article there are
7 footnotes, all in Arabic script, so I am unable to reproduce
them here.
-Tom Mickus 11/26/89
======================================================================
A BRIEF ACCOUNT OF THE TRUE NATURE OF THE "UFO ENTITIES"
--------------------------------------------------------
by
Gordon Creighton
This article, which appeared originally in FSR 29/1 (October 1983)
is reprinted now at the request of a number of readers, and to remind all
our readers of what lies ahead for Mankind. Ever since its publication,
the article has been treated throughout the world with total silence, and
and there is a general agreement among all Ufologists on both sides of the
Atlantic never to give it a mention.
FSR Consultant Dr Richard F. Haines expected me to print his
comphrehensive REVIEW OF EXPLANATORY HYPOTHESES FOR UNIDENTIFIED AERIAL
PHENOMENA, and I promptly did so. (FSR 32/2 - 1987.) But it might be
noted that he did not deem it necessary to include the slightest reference
to my work in his survey, even as a minimal gesture of courtesy.
Four of the leading experts in Ufology in the world have written
me privately to say that they think I am on the right track. Only one
of them - Ann Druffel - has had the guts to say so publicly. EDITOR
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
One of the more curious features of the followers of the various
religions is that, being so dogmatically certain that in their own
particular little faith they already possess the whole Truth about all
things in Heaven and Earth, it almost never occurs to any of them to look
elsewhere and find out what the followers of other religions may know or
may have discovered.
This is certainly a pity, for study of all the great world-religions
- and notably Islam - would yield valuable clues as to the true nature
of the so-called "UFO Phenomenon" and would rapidly eliminate much of
the fatuous "Space-Age Mythology" that has been spawned in such profusion
over the last three decades.
Islam knows, in fact, of the existence of THREE entirely separate
and distinct species of intelligent beings in the Universe, and indeed
can furnish suprisingly precise details regarding their natures and roles
and activities.
ANGELS, MEN, AND JINNS
The first category is of course that of the ANGELS or Messengers
(Greek: ANGELOS; Hebrew: MALACH; Arabic: MALAK). These are high beings
created of LIGHT.
The third category are MEN, with bodies created according to the
QUR'AN, of CLAY, or, in other words, this being poetic language, they
have physical bodies assembled from the mineral and chemical elements of
our PERIODIC TABLE - the "PLANETARY BODY", as Gurdjieff used to call it.
The second category, however, and the one with which we are here
concerned, is the category of those beings (CREATED BEFORE MAN WAS) who
are referred to collectively in Arabic as AL-JINN *1*. Although there
is some dispute about it among Arab grammarians, most of their lex-
icologists seem to hold that the word derives - as Arabic words almost
invariably do - from a verb-root, namely JANNA, "TO HIDE OR TO CONCEAL"
- indeed a very fitting derivation for the name of these creatures.
Whereas the bodies of Angels are of light and the bodies of men
are of the gross elements of the Earth, the bodies of AL-JINN consist
of what is variously translated as "ESSENTIAL FIRE" *2*, or "ESSENTIAL
FLAME", or "SMOKELESS FIRE" *3*, or "SMOKELESS FLAME", and it is
specifically stated in the QUR'AN (Surah XV, 26 and 27) THAT THEY WERE
CREATED BEFORE MANKIND WAS. (Some scholars have speculated that these
might be the "PRE-ADAMIC MEN" whose existence is hinted at here and
there in the Holy Bible.)
There has been much debate among modern students of Arabic as
to precisely what these terms "MIN NARI AL-SAMUMI" *2* and "MIN MARIJIN
MIN NARIN" *3* can conceivably mean in modern parlance, and some
scholars have concluded that, in using these terms, the Prophet Muhammad
(the Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon him) was there attempting to
describe what Western occultists have tried to describe by such terms
as ETHER, or maybe the so-called ETHERIC OR ASTRAL PLANES. (I have also
seen it suggested that some sort of PLASMA is indicated.)
(Needless to say, such concepts as ETHERIC PLANE and ASTRAL
PLANE have no meaning for modern Science and, so far as I know, apart
from Dirac, the physicists have abandoned their speculations regarding
the existence of an ether.)
THE SOURCE OF THE JINNS
Wherever it is that the JINNS are thought of as being normally
located, it seems highly likely that the source of many of them, at any
rate, is not very distant from us, and some Muslim scholars who have
become aware of the current Western research into the so-called "UFO
Phenomenon" and have reflected awhile upon it have concluded - and I
think correctly - that maybe the best way we can start to visualize
these matters is by thinking of the JINNS AS BEING VERY CLOSE INDEED
TO US AND AND YET AT THE SAME TIME SOMEHOW VERY FAR FROM US. IN OTHER
WORDS, ON SOME OTHER DIMENSION, OR IN SOME OTHER SPACE/TIME FRAMEWORK,
"RIGHT HERE', OR MAYBE IN A WORLD OF ANTI-MATTER RIGHT HERE, OR
OCCUPYING AS IT WERE SOME OTHER UNIVERSE THAT IS HERE, BEHIND ALICE'S
MIRROR: "A MIRROR-UNIVERSE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE SPACE-TIME
CONTINUUM" AS IT HAS BEEN NEATLY PUT BY SOME INVESTIGATORS.
The QUR'AN, however, is not clear on this, and admittedly it looks
as though it is very possible that some of the JINNS could be fully
physical and what we call extraterrestrials, while other species of
them are of an altogether and finer sort of matter, corresponding to
what various UFO investigators have tried to indicate by such terms
as "ULTRATERRESTRIAL" or "METATERRESTRIAL".
In thinking abou these ideas, we might bear in mind the theory
of the Russian philosopher P.D. Ouspensky regarding the possible
existence of other, more subtle, levels of matter on which the elements
of the Periodic Table of our own chemical world are repeated - and, if
I understand him aright, repeated more than once, on more than one
level. The early writings of Dr. Meade Layne in the USA about the
"DENSE ETHERIC WORLD" from which he maintained that the UFO entities
and their craft originated should also be borne in mind. (His book,
THE COMING OF THE GUARDIANS, was published in 1958, and may prove one
day to have been very important indeed.) Certain of the benevolent
JINNS may well be our "Guardians".
That there is some close affinity, or some link of destiny
between JINNS and Mankind seems certain, for although the vast majority
of the JINNS are DEVILS, SHAYTANS *4*, nevertheless we are assured in
the QUR'AN that some among their many species are "goodies" and are
capable of salvation. For it is specifically stated that Muhammad was
sent as a Messenger to both Mankind and the JINNS, so that, in the
Final Days, some of the JINNS will enter into Paradise, while the rest
of them will be cast down into Hell. Their revelation to IBLIS *5*,
the Top Devil ( = SATAN) is in general somewhat obscure. In the QUR'AN
IBLIS is certainly described as a JINN, but elsewhere in the QUR'AN he
is also described as an ANGEL. (Surely the explanation is that IBLIS
is that same high being, originally of Angelic status, who rebelled
against God and is named in the Christian texts as LUCIFER?)
Had we the space, much more might be said about the JINNS and
their doings, but only a brief account of their main characteristics
can here be given. Their principal features, as listed below, are as
I have gathered them from all the Muslim written and traditional
sources that I have been able to consult over the past 15 years. The
reader can see for himself the parallels with the reported features
of UFO entities and can draw his own conclusions. I hope I do not
have to labour the point, space being precious.
THE CHIEF CHARACTERISTICS OF THE JINNS
1. In the normal state they are not visible to ordinary human
sight.
2. They are, however, capable of materializing and appearing
in the physical world. And they can alternately make themselves
visible or invisible at will.
3. They can change shape, and appear in any sort of guise,
large or small. (See for example, Ahmad Jamaludin's excellent report,
A WAVE OF SMALL HUMANOIDS IN MALAYSIA IN 1970, in FSR Vol. 28, No. 5).
Ahmad Jamaludin is a Muslim, and he knows, of course, what it is that
we are talking about.
4. They are able also to appear in the guise of ANIMALS. (Yetis?
Pumas? Loch Ness Monsters?)
5. They are inveterate liars and deceivers, and delight in
bamboozling and misleading mankind with all manner of nonsense. (See
the average Spiritualist SEANCE for examples of their activities, and
also the usual "communications" from UFO entities in close-encounter
cases.)
6. They are addicted to the abduction or kidnapping of humans.
(The Scotsman Robert Kirk, who wrote "THE SECRET COMMONWEALTH" in 1691,
evidently "knew more than was good for his health", and was killed by
them.)
7. They delight in tempting humans into sexual intercourse and
liaisons with them, and Arabic literature abounds with accounts of this
kind of contact by mankind with both the "goodies" and the "baddies"
among the JINNS. There are also even a considerable number of accounts
of encounters between the "goodies" and famous Muslim saints. For
example, the book MANAQUIB AL-ARIFIN *6* has a number of very significant
references to contacts between such higher beings, and JALAL AL-DIN RUMI,
Islam's greatest mystical poet, who lived from 1207 to 1273.
(I often wonder which category of JINNUS it was that was en-
countered in Brazil by the farmer A.V.B. See my third article on
"A.V.B.", POSTCRIPT TO THE MOST AMAZING CASE OF ALL, in FSR Vol. 11,
No. 4, August 1965.)
IN OFFICIAL ISLAM - AND THIS CANNOT BE OVER-EMPHASIZED - THE
EXISTENCE OF THE JINNS HAS ALWAYS BEEN COMPLETELY ACCEPTED, EVEN LEGALLY,
AND EVEN TO THIS DAY, IN ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE. THE FULL CONSEQUENCES
IMPLIED BY THEIR EXISTENCE WERE WORKED OUT LONG AGO. THEIR LEGAL STATUS,
IN ALL RESPECTS, WAS DISCUSSED AND FIXED, AND THE POSSIBLE RELATIONS
BETWEEN THEM AND MANKIND - ESPECIALLY IN RELATION TO QUESTIONS OF
MARRIAGE AND PROPERTY! - WERE SERIOUSLY EXAMINED BY JURISTS, AS THE
GREATEST AND MOST AUTHORITATIVE WESTERN SOURCE, THE ENCYCLOPAEDIA OF
ISLAM, CONFIRMS.
Stories of sexual commerce between JINNS and mankind have been of
perennial interest to Arab readers, and it is important at this point to
mention that in CHINESE literature (and in China the Han population are
not Muslims - only certain of the smaller minority peoples of the North-
West and Far West are) there is also a considerable tradition of this
sort which awaits examination by Ufologists.
The great Arabic literary catalogue known as the FIHRIST *7*,
compiled in the year 373 of the Muslim Calendar ( = A.D. 995) by
Muhammad bin Ishaq bin Abi Ya'qub al-Nadim al-Warraq al-Baghdadi, lists
no less than sixteen works dealing with this theme. (Compare also the
European occultists' records of sexual contact between men and female
SYLPHS, as well as the copious mediaeval Christian records relating to
INCUBI and SUCCABAE.)
Most Westerners will discount all this talk about the JINNS with
the usual argument that the Arabs "are barbarians anyway". Let me
therefore point out that, in A.D.995, when the FIHRIST was written, the
brilliant civilization of the Arabs was incomparably higher than anything
elsewhere in the world except for China and that our Christian, Western,
RENAISSANCE owes its origins as much to our contact with Islam (the
Crusades) as to the early percolation of Greek learning to the West.
As a matter of fact quite a lot of the philosophy and the literature of
the Greeks reached us first, not in Greek at all, but in the Arabic
translations secured from Cordoba and Toledo in Spain in the 10th and
11th centuries, when the Muslims still held most of Spain. It is only
in the last few centuries, and particularly since the Industrial
Revolution and the growth of modern materialistic Science, that the
West has forged ahead. But in 1200 A.D. Muslim Science was in the
lead, particularly in such fields as Medicine, Mathematics, and
Astronomy, and it would be grossly impudent to assume that our current
"superiority" over them has anything permanent about it.
8. THE JINNS are wont to snatch up humans and teleport or
transport them, setting them down again - if indeed they ever do set
them down again - miles away from where they were picked up, and all
this is the "twinkling of an eye". (See my first article on TELEPORTATIONS,
about the Spanish soldier who, on October 25, 1593, was suddenly taken
from Manila in the Philippine Islands across the Pacific to Mexico City.
In FSR Vol. 11, No. 2, 1965).
9. The Arabian tradition asserts that, throughout all known
history, there have been a few particular human beings who, through
some strange favour, have "been in league with the JINNS" or "had a
compact with the JINNS" - to such a degree that the JINNS have endowed
them with what we regard as "preternatural powers" - ie., PSYCHIC POWERS.
These humans have consequently become known as wonder-workers,
soothsayers, and MAGICIANS. (Either "white magicians" or "black
magicians", depending of course upon what sort of JINNS they were in
league with.)
Here again, compare the European tradition about individuals who
have discovered how to collaborate with the KINGDOM OF THE SYLPHS or the
FAIRIES. For example, there is the case of the "working partnership",
not more than seventy years ago, between a SYLPH and a highly successful
Parisian dealer in rare old books. The SYLPH made its contribution by
acting as the "scout" and finding out where and in whose possession the
rare books were. All the dealer had to do then was to approach the
owners and offer to buy!
10. Along with all these displays of prowess by the JINNS there
goes, finally, a tremendous TELEPATHIC POWER and the ability (to use an
age-old term) to "CAST A GLAMOUR" over their human victims. Our UFO
records are already full of evidence of this.
How much of what we see happening today, at the highest levels
of international politics, as well as in ordinary human affairs, can
be attributed to this subtle control and interference in our lives by
insidious and unseen forces! Indeed, this is one of the prime reasons
for the parlous state in which man finds himself. Some recent reports
from UFO investigators hint at alien plans to provoke war here and drive
the Gadarene Swine (mankind) over into the abyss.
The present-day Christians, who generally seem to have very
little sense of curiosity, are apparently quite happy to pass their
days in total ignorance of all this. But a careful study of the New
Testament (AND ONLY IN THE ORIGINAL GREEK!) will show clearly that
nothing of what is said above was unknown either to the Teacher and
Healer Jeshu of Nazareth or to his principal followers - particularly
Paul. (Incidentally, Christians may like to know that in Islam the full
name and title of Jeshu of Nazareth is ISSA, SON OF MARY, WORD OF GOD.)
Long before the rise of Christianity or Islam there were of
course other great Teachers (Messengers) who preceived clearly the
situation in which mankind finds itself. One of these was Zarathustra
(Zoroaster) in the old Iranian civilization of the Achaemenidae - about
600 or 700 years B.C. The great religious text left by Zarathustra is
the AVESTA, which tells us much about the Demonic Forces, referred to
under the blanket term of AHRIMAN, the Enemy of Light. Mankind, in
this teaching, is seen as a special creation of ORMAZD, the SUPREME
SPIRIT, who is locked in permanent conflict with AHRIMAN.
THE SOUL OF MAN IS THE OBJECT OF THE WAR, AND MAN HIMSELF IS
THE BATTLEFIELD.
DR. RUDOLPH STEINER
In our days, there has probably been no teacher who saw and
understood all this more clearly that the great Austrian Dr. Rudolf
Steiner (1861-1925), founder of the Anthroposophical Society.
Clairvoyant from childhood, Steiner saw into the other worlds
and planes and saw deeply into the human heart, and no books or teach-
ings are so relevant as his are to the crisis of mankind that is now
upon us. His lectures throughout 1917, for example, show clearly that
he foresaw, in their totality, the political, social, and military
results and the police-state tyranny which would inevitably follow from
the Russian Revolution, just as the "Lady" of the Apparitions at Fatima
in the same year also did. Steiner foresaw what would result in the
world as a whole from a materialistic science run mad: the development
of "test-tube" man, "biological engineering" and other horrors; the
deliberate creation and development of living monsters; and the soul-
less, God-less, dehumanized, computerized, insect-like chromium and
plastic slave world of "1984" that may now be at hand.
According to Steiner, a tremendous and crucial round in the
battle was fought out in the last thirty years of the 19th century,
and on the Inner Planes, between the Forces of AHRIMAN (the term he
took over from Zarathustra) and the FORCES OF LIGHT. These latter
are conventionally known to our Western, Christian tradition as the
Cohorts of Michael. Steiner said that the fight ended in a complete
victory for the LIGHT, but that, as a result of it, a great many of
the powerful demonic beings had been actually cast down upon the
planet Earth, with the consequence that their presence and their in-
fluence now impinge more than ever upon the propects and the destiny
of mankind.
STEINER TAUGHT THAT THE COMING YEARS WILL SEE INCREDIBLE
UPHEAVALS, IN THE COURSE OF WHICH THIS GREAT BATTLE WILL BE CARRIED
FORWARD, TO ITS CONCLUSION, INSIDE EVERY HUMAN HEART. See Rudolf
Steiner: DER STURZ DER GEISTER DER FINSTERNIS: (THE OVERTHROW OF THE
SPIRITS OF DARKNESS), Series of Lectures, 1917. (Available only in
German.)
The objective of the Forces of Darkness is to take over the
stream of human evolution, to merge with it, and to divert mankind
from the evolutionary development planned for it. The end result of
this would be new creatures in which those qualities that represent
the highest that we know would have been eliminated.
Smart-alecky modern man of the Pop Age, the "Trousered Ape" as
he has been called, has of course no use for all this sort of "rubbish",
and immense numbers of our species have discarded all belief in the
existence of demons, along with any belief in the Great Power that rules
the Universe.
(Sophisticated folk nowadays know that the world was not created
by God, but by Karl Marx. And they know that Lenin and successors are
His Prophets.)
There is a delightful passage in C.S. Lewis's SCREWTAPE LETTERS,
where the Senior Devil, talking to one of his underlings, makes a
profoundly important remark: "OF COURSE, OUR GREATEST TRUMP-CARD IS
THE FACT THAT EVERYBODY *KNOWS* WE DON'T EXIST." (Or words to that
effect.)
Similarly, the vast majority of mankind KNOW that JINNS and UFOs
and UFO entities don't exist. And what a nice advantage that is for
the entities!
But what if HOMO SAP (so-called, self-dubbed) were in for some
big shocks in the near future? What then?
With the recent advance of Science, man has rapidly become aware
of the vastness of the Cosmos and of the probability that there exist
out there innumerable other physical worlds inhabited by intelligent
beings, some of which, for all we know, may be (as we dearly hope)
identical with men, with our tastes and our values, our hopes and our
fears.
It is natural that some among us, surveying the impasse into
which we have got ourselves, might well be tempted to look up to the
stars in the hope that someone wiser than we are might arrive one day
from there and give us all the easy answers.
If there be any truth in the ancient story that the inhabitants
of Magonia, unlike men, do not possess the possibility of developing
immortal souls, and therefore are anxious to acquire such by mating
with us and mingling their life-stream with ours, what moment could be
more propitious to them for achieving their purpose than now?
Can't you just hear the message of their Captain?
-"WE ARE FROM TAU CETI, AND WE COME TO BRING YOU SALVATION
AND SHOW YOU THE WAY OUT OF YOUR PROBLEMS. WE WILL GET
YOU OFF THE HOOK!"
================================= EOF =======================================
=============================================================================
= IF YOU HAVE ANY UFO RELATED INFORMATION THAT YOU WOULD LIKE US TO SEE =
= OR HAVE DISTRIBUTED, YOU CAN NOW SEND IT VIA OUR NEW UFONET FAX LINE. =
=============================================================================
= ------>>> UFONET FAX HOTLINE - 24 Hrs - (414) 351-2075 <<<------ =
=============================================================================


241
textfiles.com/ufo/jmp.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
>> The following document has apparently been making the rounds since
last fall. Supposedly it has been mailed to over 6000 researchers, however
that is highly dubious, as I don't believe there are actually that many
UFO researchers in the world; certainly, no mailing list that large ex-
ists. Very few people I know have received one, and I got mine from John
Lear. There is no confirmation that the President or any members of
Congress have received a copy, either. MUFON was unaware of the letter un-
til Walt Andrus got a copy, and is more than a little miffed that replies
were referred to the MUFON Journal by the letter's author(s). So far,
there has been no identification of the author(s); no one has ever heard
of Justice for Military Personnel (JMP), and no members have stepped
forward to claim credit. It is, however, an intensely interesting docu-
ment, for reasons we will discuss in a later upload.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
R E Q U E S T F O R A N E X E C U T I V E O R D E R
J.M.P. / letter to President Ronald Reagan
Reprinted copies to members of Congress and the press. 4 Dec 1987
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
President of the United States
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20500
4 Sep. 1987
Dear Mr. President:
The CIA has made a mockery out of our constitution. Our elected re-
presentatives have no idea what we in the Military have done and are still
doing, since the CIA decided that "they do not have a need to know," mak-
ing it mandatory for all of us in the Military and Government, both active
and retired, who have knowledge regarding UFOs, to testify with total im-
munity before a special congressional committee. The CIA can not object,
because officially "UFOs do not exist."
The UFO cover-up is not in our national security interest. It should
be stopped, because it hurts military morale. Our group, Justice for Mili-
tary Personnel (JMP), consists of retired military personnel who were af-
fected by, or involved in different capacities with the UFO cover-up. Un-
der orders of the CIA, in the "interest of national security," we took
part in intentionally misleading the nation, manipulating the press, the
courts and most politicians.
INTRODUCTION:
The CIA UFO cover-up, is being perpetrated against the American peo-
ple and not our potential enemies. The Russians have a whole town exclus-
ively for UFO research. The CIA insists that the UFO cover-up must be kept
at all costs, otherwise the military will be ineffective. The CIA correct-
ly maintains, that military personnel will disobey orders when confronted
by UFOs. For example, during the Vietnam War, pilots refused orders to fly
night missions against UFOs. Since fatal accidents, UFO related, are rela-
tively rare (with the exception of the Vietnam War), the CIA prefers to
maintain the cover-up.
NSA, NASA, CIA, RAND and AFOSI associates, have informed us that
UFOs have many origins. Some obviously represent civilizations, thousands
of years more advanced than we are. Almost everything about them, their
motives and operations are strange and incomprehensible to us. There is
little we can do to protect ourselves from them. The Air Force is totally
helpless to handle the situation, because of UFO's incredible flight per-
formance. The CIA and Pentagon are bewildered by UFOs' apparent ability to
jam all our ground and air electronic equipment, or instantaneously dis-
able all our weapons control systems. The CIA has decided to try to under-
stand and duplicate UFO propulsion systems at all cost. This means that
pilot lives have been sacrificed in UFO chases to get "UFO samples" for
research, therefore `Ignorance is Bliss.'
RAND maintains that the CIA is gambling that a major catastrophe,
such as the July, 1952, mass UFO appearance over Washington, DC and the
White House, will not happen again, so that no "explanations will be need-
ed. NORAD, along with many of us in the armed forces, bitterly oppose per-
petuation of this cover-up, pointing to the public panic potential of the
1952 disaster. We in the JMP feel that too many military personnel suf-
fered or died as a result of not being informed about UFOs. It is time to
tell our armed forces the truth. IT IS UNCONSCIONABLE to continue to use
military personnel as guinea pigs.
CRIMES WE COMMITTED UNDER CIA PRESSURE:
Forty years ago, the cover-up was confined to a very few individuals
within the Military and Government. Today, many thousands are effected or
involved. This deceitful CIA policy is breeding resentment in the serv-
ices, for we were ordered to act illegally, against our fellow military
personnel and our nation. Our JMP group has many military personnel and
others who are waiting to testify. The following are a few examples of
deceptive activities we carried out while on active duty:
1: We intentionally ordered pilots to shoot at UFOs, with the hope
of acquiring a UFO for research purposes. These resulted sometimes in
instant explosions and death to the pilots or instantaneous "disappear-
ances" of pilot and plane. The UFOs occupants seem to be monitoring all of
our pilots' actions. We analyzed hundreds of UFO gun camera films and it
seems that some UFOs are remote controlled.
2. We have strictly silenced military pilots who reported UFOs. We
do not allow our pilots to discuss UFO chases EVEN AMONG THEMSELVES.
3. We interrogated, intimidated and harassed military personnel who
saw UFOs, to "convince" them (excluding pilots and astronauts), that they
"did not see" what they saw; frightened them with the prospect of long
prison sentences if they told anyone what they saw; transferred them alone
to bases around the world, where, even if they were to talk, nobody would
believe them; forced some of them into mental institutions; jailed them;
destroyed their military careers; did everything possible to intimidate
UFO witnesses by fear into self doubt and silence.
4. We distributed fraudulent information, through Military and Gov-
ernment spokesmen or scientists, to debunk all public UFO sightings.
5. We forced the FAA, NASA, and other Government agencies to conform
to CIA UFO policies.
6. We violated the Freedom of Information Act by hiding documents.
7. We smeared commercial pilots who publicly reported UFOs and
forced their companies to silence them.
8. We did not confirm when civilian planes around the world also
temporarily lost control or completely disappeared when UFOs were present.
We slandered ruthlessly some of our most outstanding and competent
citizens, who dared to report UFO sightings, while we knew all along that
they were telling the truth, as we tracked the UFOs on radar.
10. We silenced Congressmen and Senators who requested UFO inform-
ation for their constituents. These representatives are now silent part-
ners to this cover-up and are consequently directly responsible for all
the crimes we committed.
PRESS IN DEFAULT:
The national UFO debunking campaign ordered by the CIA in 1953, pub-
lished books and planted hundreds of articles in the press, to create an
atmosphere of ridicule around the subject of UFOs, falsely creating "UFO
contacts" and "UFO" hoaxes. This campaign which is still in effect today,
infiltrated major civilian civilian UFO groups, to ridicule them or divert
their efforts towards "other explanations." This UFO cover-up has been suc-
cessful beyond CIA's highest expectations, due primarily to the brilliant
manipulation of the press by the CIA via the ridicule strategy. The Estab-
lishment Press, afraid of being ridiculed, proved to be gullible beyond
belief to "official statements."
The press, for example, in attempting to divorce itself completely
from UFO data, did not question why the CIA refused to give UFO informa-
tion to the then Senator Barry Goldwater who at the time was chairman of
the Senate Intelligence Committee. IF SENATOR GOLDWATER (WHO HAS BEEN
AWARE OF THE COVER-UP) DOES NOT HAVE A HIGH ENOUGH SECURITY CLEARANCE TO
GET UFO INFORMATION, THEN WHO IN OUR GOVERNMENT DOES? The press failed to
ask, if UFOs "do not exist," why did the CIA tell Senator Goldwater that
UFO data is classified "above top secret" and "above any other secret in
the USA"? The CIA debunking campaign, using some of the best brains in
this country, slowly "educated" most journalists that they can only be
rewarded, by abandoning any sense of journalistic ethics when it comes to
reporting about UFOs.
One of the most audaciously deceptive acts by the CIA involved Pres-
ident Carter (who himself had sighted a UFO), when he requested NASA to
look into the possibility of UFO research. Until that moment, all of us
who were involved with the UFO cover-up assumed that the President was
informed by the CIA about UFOs the moment he entered office and that he
was aware of the huge sum of money invested in UFO research since 1953.
Until that moment, IT WAS INCONCEIVABLE to us that the President of the
United States would be kept totally uninformed by the CIA.
At that time, NASA's scientific team concluded that the UFO cover-up
should end because the public already knew that most astronauts in space
photographed UFOs, or had been followed by UFOs, and that the astronauts
were forced by regulations to lie to the press. Shortly before NASA's re-
lease of the news to the press, the CIA insisted on continuing to maintain
the cover-up and pressured NASA to lied to the public. NASA therefore re-
leased a statement dictated by the CIA, contradictory to their own scien-
tists' conclusions. Victor Marchetti (former Executive Assistant to the
Deputy Director of the CIA), openly maintains that President Carter prob-
ably was forced to participate in the CIA's UFO cover-up.
Most of the preposterous "explanations" of UFOs were originated by
the CIA's debunking headquarters, and disseminated to the public mostly
through the Air Force, FAA, FBI, CIA, NASA, NORAD or Pentagon spokesmen.
These shocking, mind boggling "explanations" (swamp gas, stars, etc.),
released usually after long delays, often constituted an insult to Amer-
ican public intelligence, instead of an explanation. Though these "explan-
ations" often were not logical, scientific, or factual at all, they were
eagerly accepted by the press, which was relieved to quickly dispose of
"another UFO story." There were often sharp contradictions between these
"explanations" and the pilots and radar controllers' statements, which
rarely seemed to bother the press, who claim to be Government watch dogs.
SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY IN DEFAULT:
Project `Blue Book', the `Condon Report', and many notable scien-
tists, are part of the CIA's cover-up. The `Condon Report' is a scientific
farce which was immediately exposed as a fraud by the late Professor James
E. MacDonald (world's foremost, non CIA, authority on UFOs). The `Condon
Report' has been heavily criticized ever since by all other competent
scientists (who do not work for the CIA), who actually examined the report
in depth. Incredible as it seems, many in the scientific community today
have not, and still regard the `Condon Report' as an impartial scientific
study. This attitude is a source of much amusement and self satisfaction
in the intelligence community. This manipulation of American public opin-
ion and the advanced mind control techniques employed by the CIA, were de-
scribed by one Air Force doctor as: "Psychiatric Fascism contradictory to
any democratic principles."
Now more than ever, due to our highly sophisticated detection sys-
tems, UFOs are being detected frequently over our bases and missile silos
and they have tampered with our nuclear missiles. They are being photo-
graphed in restricted areas, monitoring our military experiments. We track
them visually and/or on radar across the USA and Canada almost daily.
World-wide intelligence reports indicate very similar sightings. Many of
us objected long ago to this senseless UFO cover-up. But we could not do
anything, because the CIA controls all our military intelligence agencies
and has overwhelming influence over many Government agencies.
CONCLUSIONS:
FBI associates defined the UFO cover-up as the biggest crime ever
perpetrated against our people. The CIA, in the name of "National Security
Interest," has flagrantly violated the letter and spirit of the law. The
Uniform Code of Military Justice DOES NOT offer our soldiers any protec-
tion regarding this cover-up. As JMP members, we are torn between our de-
sire to maintain the military oath of secrecy and our sense of ethics as
responsible loyal citizens of this great nation. Yet we are fully dedi-
cated to preventing the UFO cover-up from continuing to be the status quo
in this free nation. When our country requests us in the military to give
up our lives for this land, the least the Government can do, is tell us
against whom we are fighting and why. We have the right to know.
JMP CIVIL RESPONSIBILITY:
Lack of competent news reporting on this issue, has led to the crea-
tion of JMP. We feel it is our responsibility to speak up for our citizens
who are still on active military duty. A RAND study indicates that, bar-
ring unforeseen circumstances, the CIA may continue the cover-up unabated
under the umbrella of secrecy and ridicule. JMP members therefore have pre-
pared a program that may effectively disintegrate the UFO cover-up. NSA
associate commented to us: "...once the nation will learn the magnitude of
the UFO cover-up, it may lead to a sense of awakening and outrage which
could lead to civil disobedience acts that will make the Boston Tea Party
pale by comparison, and may lead to the downfall of the CIA."
The CIA's collapse is not our intention because the CIA is important
for national defense. There is a need to preserve whatever integrity the
CIA may still have in the American public's eyes. The issue of this letter
is not CIA credibility, but our Government's credibility. This insane
CIA's UFO cover-up must end. It is a `Time-Bomb' which can't be disarmed.
This `Time-Bomb' according to RAND, is gaining momentum and must explode
one day, LET US EXPOSE IT NOW AND HELP SAVE ADDITIONAL UNNECESSARY LOSS OF
MILITARY LIVES.
This letter intentionally omits the most spectacular events in the
UFO cover-up. Members of JMP fell that it will be more appropriate that
the President himself, once informed by the CIA, will disclose these
events to the nation. We regret the anonymity of this letter, but we have
no other choice because the CIA has a clear policy of eliminating any in-
siders who may expose the UFO cover-up. As soon as the Executive Order is
issued, we will be the first to testify. Please reply via the `MUFON UFO
Journal.'
Mr. President, you have a unique opportunity in the history of man-
kind. With the interest of national security and unity in our hearts, we
respectfully wait for your actions.
J.M.P.
San Antonio, TX


215
textfiles.com/ufo/jslearrep.ufo Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
EXTRATERRESTRIAL BIOLOGICAL ENTITIES (EBE'S) AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO
HUMAN BEINGS ON EARTH: AN EXPLANATORY HYPOTHESIS
PART I
Preface
The following hypothesis discusses the significance of UFO occupant
activities to human civilization and development. To understand the
terminology and concepts discussed in this paper, readers are encouraged
to review the following works: UFO Crash at Aztec by William Steinman and
Wendelle Stevens, particularly the addendum in the back of the book titled
"The Bennewitz Story" (pages 578-604); The Roswell Incident by William
Moore; Leonard Stringfield's Status Reports II and III on UFO
crash/retrievals; John Lear's "LEAR.TXT" on Paranet computer bulletin
board; the updated transcript of Linda Howe's documentary "Strange
Harvest" (page 64); Jerome Clark's article in the April 1988 issue of Fate
magazine: "UFO Crashes, Part IV", and Communion by Whitley Strieber.
Introduction
In December of 1987, airline pilot and UFO researcher John Lear published
a letter on Paranet. Based on his research, Lear concluded that
extraterrestrial biological entities (EBE's) are malevolent beings from
space who have orchestrated a deceptive, "well-planned invasion of Earth
for its resources and benefits." Lear's scenario reads like the plot of a
science fiction horror film: The EBE'S have perpetrated a "grand
deception" on humans to hide their true motives which are to create
human-alien crossbreeds, presumably for sinister purposes, and consume
human
biological matter. According to Lear, the EBE'S terminate any humans who
might interfere with them.
Because John Lear appears to be sincere in his research and has
impressive credentials, ufologists are seriously examining his statement.
For example, Jim Speiser, Paranet's administrator, says in his
introduction to Lear's letter, "John...has contacts in sensitive positions
that could conceivably allow him access to information of this type."
Lear may have contacts that have provided him with accurate data, but
his speculations and hypotheses are presented with the same authority and
confidence as his alleged facts, even though his conclusions seem
extremely questionable.
Rather than being sinister or malevolent, is it possible that EBE'S
are members of an advanced evolutionary level of life who are tending this
planet as a garden? Might they be cultivating human life, not as a food
source, but to give human beings the opportunity to become, through their
choices, potential members and contributors to the EBE's' advanced level?
Could this planet be one of numerous planetary "gardens" established by
the EBE's for such a purpose?
In this context, all EBE activity could be seen as benevolent.
However, certain aspects of their work might seem frightening or
traumatic to a human mind, depending on that mind's level of development
and comprehension. Does the plant understand when the gardener uproots it
to replant it in better soil, or prunes and grafts to ensure proper
improved growth?
In the field of science, a single set of data has often been
interpreted in profoundly different ways. When we are dealing with
obviously advanced technology, how can we be sure that we are interpreting
what we see with any accuracy? Can those who base conclusions about
advanced beings only on what is measurable or verifiable by current
technology ever see more than a limited picture? Even if John Lear's
facts are correct concerning underground CIA-alien facilities, body parts
floating in vats of amber liquid, etc., the facts do not necessarily
warrant Lear's horrified conclusions.
Is it possible to arrive at a valid conclusion based solely on "hard
evidence"? Perhaps not, but we should not adopt a purely spiritual
approach either, as do many UFO contactees and "channelers" or we risk
arriving at pleasant metaphysical fantasies that do not jive with observed
phenomena.
Lear posed the question, "What is the big picture, anyway?"
(Lear.txt). In attempting to answer this, we obviously need a big frame
of reference. Perhaps examining some of the details that Lear discussed
will give us that perspective.
* * * * *
John Lear suggests, along with Budd Hopkins, that EBE's may be on the
"backside of an evolutionary genetic curve." They base this on the EBE's
having, for example, a lack of hair and teeth, fewer fingers and toes, and
atrophied or missing digestive and reproductive organs. Isn't it possible
that just the opposite is true--that the absence of digestive and
reproductive organs are signs of evolving and outgrowing the need for
"primitive" organs? Rather than the EBE's needing to revitalize
themselves by inbreeding with humans and/or consuming extractions from
human and bovine tissue, isn't it possible that they are experimenting
with hybridization and tissue samples for our sakes?
If you consider the possibility that UFO occupants may have been
involved in the creation of free-willed human beings from the very
beginning, couldn't their present genetic work be an effort to correct the
severe damage that we have inflicted upon our genetic structure? Maybe
the EBE's are seeking ways to undo the effects of generations of
unrestrained primitive behavior (territorialism, wars,selfishness, etc.),
drug usage, pollution, food additives, etc.?
Could EBE's represent the goal toward which human beings have the
capacity to evolve if they choose? This may be difficult for some to
accept if they see the EBE's appearance as "strange" by human standards.
Could it also be hard to think about because our egos have difficulty with
the notion that human beings do not represent the height of evolutionary
advancement in the universe? Lear himself notes how difficult it was for
the human mind to accept that the Sun does not revolve around the Earth.
Lear acknowledges that EBE's may be as much as a billion years ahead
of human beings in advancement. How does this jive with his statement
that "the EBE's have a genetic disorder in that their digestive system is
atrophied?" It seems more probable that a digestive system is simply not
required for a space-dwelling organism. (Just think of the time that
leaves them free to do more significant work than preparing food, eating,
digesting, and eliminating.) And if they are so advanced that they can
create life in a laboratory, why would they need reproductive organs?
Lear concludes that EBE's are deriving sustenance from enzyme or
hormonal secretions applied to their skin. Aren't there other possible
explanations for these applications? This is pure conjecture, but could
they be applying these secretions to their skin as a means of analyzing
them, that
is, using their own bodies as test subjects?
Let's take a look at so-called mutilations for a moment. A
significant point in researcher Linda Howe's examination of animal
mutilations comes in an update to her documentary "Strange Harvest." In
the transcript of that film (update 1st broadcast, May 25, 1980), Howe
says she received information from a psychic in Albuquerque. The psychic
correctly predicted that a deviation would occur in the surgical method
used by the aliens, "...which is...a necessity in order to arrive at a
success in formulation of a serum-like concoction which will be returned
to mankind during a time of need." (Howe p. 64) Linda Howe might be
commended for her courage as an investigator in quoting a psychic. The
point is that there may be beneficial reasons why the EBE's are performing
their surgical operations. It is interesting that when a tribe of American
Indians were once asked what they thought of "mutilations" occurring on
their reservation, they replied simply, "The star people know what they
are doing, and should be trusted."
Before continuing to speculate about the motivations of UFO occupants,
we have to ask ourselves, is it possible to understand what EBE's are and
what they are doing if we don't know what human beings are?
Consider, if you will, that the true nature of man is a "life force"
or mind (often referred to as a "soul") encapsulated in a physical body.
Could the human mind itself be the creation of a higher evolutionary level
(the EBE's)? Could the human mind be a perennial that experiences
successive seasons of growth on a planet's surface just as a perennial
plant experiences seasons of growth in a garden?
In this context, reincarnation is not a religious concept. It is
merely one way of describing how a mental being (man) can experience
evolutionary growth and development by progressing through various
physical vehicles.
If this is the case, then nothing is lost when the physical body dies.
The "life force" or mind is not destroyed, but merely transferred to
another body, or possibly somehow put in storage.
Many close encounter records indicate that the EBE's, although aware
that nothing is lost when the human body is destroyed, are reluctant to
destroy a human body,even though they have done so in certain
circumstances. Ironically, although most humans regard the physical body
as a person's totality, we are inclined to destroy each other senselessly,
and wantonly.
UFO occupants seem to understand far more than we do about the
difference between mind and body, and how to work with both, separately or
together. It appears that they can extract the consciousness (mind, soul)
of a person from the body which is housing that consciousness. In
addition to the numerous accounts of physical "abductions", UFO literature
is filled with incidents where humans reportedly experience being taken
outside of their physical bodies.
In addition, some humans feel they have encountered the same UFO
occupant on different occasions, even though the individual they
"recognize" has a totally different appearance. This could suggest that
the EBE's can also transfer their own consciousness or mind from one body
to another, like changing clothes.
We can see that the variety of UFO occupant types may not necessarily
represent different species from different galaxies. The various
vehicular types may simply show different levels of development. It seems
likely that the more advanced minds of this highly evolved level are the
ones in the more advanced bodies..
UFO occupants who appear to be in human form, including the so-called
"Nordics," may in fact be advanced humans from other productive gardens
(planets) who have been allowed to work with the EBE's, even though they
haven't yet advanced enough to earn more evolved vehicles. The presence
of such individuals may come in very handy at times, as in the famous
Travis Walton case where a large human-looking occupant was able to
restore calm to Walton.
John Lear states that UFO researcher William Moore has a videotape
containing an interview with a colonel connected to MJ-12. The colonel
says that the EBE's claim to have created Christ. Once again, Lear draws
a negative conclusion from this, speculating that the claim "could be an
effort to disrupt traditional values for undetermined reasons."
(Lear.txt)
But what if the claim is true? If the primary concern of EBE's is the
cultivation and nurturing of human minds, then isn't it conceivable that
Jesus could have been one of them in human "clothing"? Considering recent
evidence that human mothers have been artificially inseminated by
extraterrestrials to produce hybrids, isn't this a possible explanation
for Jesus' alleged virgin birth? Wouldn't such a hybrid vehicle have
given him a greater capacity to stay in touch with his "father," and even
perform what humans would see as "miracles"?
Consider that the Bible, divested of its traditional religious
interpretation, may actually be a record of close encounters. According
to this record, the extraterrestrials apparently worked closely with the
ancient Israelites and saved them from the terrestrial power of the
Egyptians. But the EBE's didn't hesitate to wipe out thousands of the
Israelites when they were disobedient. If you see this in the light of
the EBE's trying to teach humans how to become more refined and more
evolved, the first step being simple disciplines and leaving a strong
impression on human minds, it's food for thought. Only human bodies were
lost, not minds. It also puts Lear's alleged altercation between humans
and EBE's at the Dulce underground base in a different light.
Maybe we should be asking: Are we growing in the right way? How
should we conduct ourselves in the presence of these individuals and how
should we conduct ourselves with each other? What do we have to gain by
treating EBE's as hostile invaders? What is the real purpose of these
visitations? Since we seem to be far less advanced, maybe the only way we
can gain is by concluding they are here for our benefit.
J.S.
April 1988