mirror of
https://github.com/opsxcq/mirror-textfiles.com.git
synced 2025-08-08 08:26:41 +02:00
update
This commit is contained in:
150
textfiles.com/100/bbsdeath.pro
Normal file
150
textfiles.com/100/bbsdeath.pro
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
|
||||
What ever happened to real bulletin-board systems?
|
||||
|
||||
First off, I'd like to make it perfectly clear that I cannot
|
||||
be objective in these notes. These are observations, but they
|
||||
are from 1) a Sysop
|
||||
2) a user of 8BBS, the greatest BBS ever evolved
|
||||
3) a boy ... who's become a boyish programmer
|
||||
4) an old timer....1977 was when I first started
|
||||
using BBS systems.
|
||||
5) the author of a BBS system
|
||||
|
||||
If you're expecting objectivity, then don't bother reading on. I have a
|
||||
rather unique perspective on the entire BBS scene. I've been around since close
|
||||
to the beginning, and I'm wondering what has happened. Have BBS's gone the way
|
||||
of CB? Is the entire system in a slump? Is there anything wrong at all?
|
||||
|
||||
I'm going to try to present these questions and show how things have
|
||||
changed...for the better, and for the worst.
|
||||
|
||||
HISTORY:
|
||||
|
||||
A long time ago, in a city far-far away, two men had an insight. Ward
|
||||
Christensen and Randy Suess wanted a way to leave notes and messages to their
|
||||
programmer/engineer friends. Back then, modems were used by field-engineers and
|
||||
some high-level executives to talk to their companies computers. A 300 baud
|
||||
modem was extremely fast, as most people were using 110 baud TeleTypes. Ward
|
||||
and Randy devloped the concept of the BBS. They called it CBBS, for "Computer
|
||||
Bulletin Board System." CBBS was the first of its kind. It was an enormous
|
||||
program written in 8080 assmebly language. By our standards today, it was
|
||||
kludgy and bug-ridden, but back then it was heavenly. Users could enter
|
||||
messages and read messages... that was about it.
|
||||
|
||||
CBBS was a wonderful concept, but it was localized to the Chicago area. Ward
|
||||
and Randy were the only ones who were running the program. Then Bill Blue came
|
||||
along and wrote ABBS, which was designed to "emulate" the CBBS system. I feel
|
||||
it was ABBS, rather than CBBS which made the real breakthrough. While ABBS was
|
||||
much less powerful, and more difficult to use, it could be run on a "universal"
|
||||
machine: --The Apple ][--
|
||||
|
||||
Anyone with an Apple ][ and a D.C. Hayes MM][ modem could run ABBS. This
|
||||
program could be installed in a matter of minutes, and anyone could have their
|
||||
own bulletin board system. Soon after the release of ABBS, several other BBS
|
||||
programs (for various computers) soon followed. ABBS was the king for many
|
||||
years, just because there were more ABBS systems than any other BBS program
|
||||
available.
|
||||
|
||||
It is this time that I would like to refer to as the "Golden age of the BBS."
|
||||
It wasn't as golden as you might think. Most Sysops would come home every
|
||||
evening from work to find that their BBS had crashed because of yet another bug.
|
||||
Even back then, user's logged in under false names and left obscene messages.
|
||||
|
||||
The one point that made that age golden was the users. Without users, a BBS
|
||||
is just a program. With users, it gains a personality, and if I may be
|
||||
metaphysical, a soul. The users MAKE the BBS. A Sysop may have the greatest
|
||||
BBS program in the world, but without active users, he just has a computer
|
||||
wasting line-current.
|
||||
|
||||
LIFE IN THE "GOLDEN AGE"
|
||||
|
||||
A user would think nothing of spending his Saturday helping "The Sysop" find
|
||||
an intermittant bug in the BBS program.
|
||||
|
||||
A user would not only answer his or HER mail, but also butt into other
|
||||
people's conversations and throw in his/her two cents worth.
|
||||
|
||||
A user would suggest improvements to make the system easier to use.
|
||||
|
||||
A Sysop would care for his BBS like a baby. He'd spend 2 hours each night
|
||||
writing messages and playing with modifications to the program.
|
||||
|
||||
A Sysop would NOT restrict conversation to one particular topic...such as CP/M
|
||||
software.
|
||||
|
||||
A Sysop would tolerate kids who were just learning how to use modems. He'd
|
||||
even give them a hand getting things working.
|
||||
|
||||
A Sysop would [on his own preference] dilligently weed out obscene or
|
||||
"pseudo-illegal" messages, -- or -- promote them as he saw fit.
|
||||
|
||||
Users would start clubs, such as the well known "Gabber Gang" and later the
|
||||
infamous "Phone Phriekers" who figured so prominently into BBS history.
|
||||
|
||||
The government didn't try to restrict BBS users. It was just "us" against
|
||||
tyranny (at that time "Ma Bell"). Although most users did not approve of "Phone
|
||||
Phrieking", everyone talked about it, and was interested in it for curiosity
|
||||
sake if nothing else. [Hard to believe, but true.]
|
||||
|
||||
Uploading and downloading of programs did not exist.
|
||||
|
||||
BBS's were few and far between. When I wrote the OxGate, the two closest
|
||||
other CP/M based machines were Kelly Smith in Simi Valley (375 miles away), and
|
||||
"Jim C" in Larkspur (100 miles away). People tended to congregate on the local
|
||||
system.
|
||||
|
||||
WHAT HAS KILLED BBS SYSTEMS:
|
||||
|
||||
1) Program uploading and downloading. People just get their programs and
|
||||
leave.
|
||||
|
||||
2) The technical clique's retaliation against "gabbers" who just used the
|
||||
systems for personal communication.
|
||||
|
||||
3) Too many BBS systems in one area. BBS's are still alive and healthy in
|
||||
low-density areas.
|
||||
|
||||
4) The loss of "anonimity" among BBS users. The BBS used to be the place to
|
||||
escape. Where no one had to be "themselves." Users such as "James Bond" and
|
||||
"Captain Scarlet" were given free reign to vent their fantasies. Today, most
|
||||
systems do not allow false names so they can keep track of users.
|
||||
|
||||
5) The anti-hacker movement. More and more people today think the word
|
||||
"hacker" means "phone phriek/computer crasher." All it ever meant was "great
|
||||
programmer." You would feel proud if someone labeled you a "hacker."
|
||||
|
||||
6) The press' ignorance of the BBS community. By trying to make a scandal out
|
||||
of all of it, they ruined a great form of communication. In particular, the
|
||||
magazine "InfoWorld" has done more harm to the BBS community than other press
|
||||
organization. While they actively TRIED to HELP the community, they have caused
|
||||
more harm in their mis-reporting of info.
|
||||
|
||||
7) Sysop's ignorance. Quite frankly, the average quality of "Sysop" has
|
||||
dropped. Sysop's are (on the whole) less active and less responsive than 5
|
||||
years ago. More and more of them are technically incompetent, they couldn't fix
|
||||
a bug if it bit them in the nose.
|
||||
|
||||
All of these problems are inter-related. We can't solve any of them until all
|
||||
of them are solved. From my descriptions it should be obvious that the "golden
|
||||
age" certainly wasn't all gold. People like "James Bond" and "Sam Daniels" had
|
||||
to be stopped, but the pendulum has swung too far to the opposite side.
|
||||
|
||||
These observations are very general. I've noticed this swing, and it has
|
||||
taken place on 95% of all of the system's I've called across America. It's sad
|
||||
that these problems have stabbed us in the back, but it's not too late to try
|
||||
and bring about a change. I don't have the answers, but maybe these
|
||||
observations will prompt thought into this death of a virtual "art form" of
|
||||
communication.
|
||||
|
||||
There is one possible solution to this problem... the acceptance of children
|
||||
again. For too long we've been kicking off kids (both phyiscal and "kids at
|
||||
heart"). They've been disruptive, and caused fights galore. Many have even
|
||||
tried to crash the systems they used.
|
||||
|
||||
"If there's any hope, it lies with the proles." -- George Orwell, _1984_
|
||||
|
||||
Perhaps the thing to do is call a few local Commodore and Apple boards and let
|
||||
the users know that they're just as welcome on your super-fancy 100mb 2400 baud
|
||||
RCP/M system as any of your so- called "serious users" . . . "serious users"
|
||||
who can't even bring themselves to answer their own mail. Saddening.
|
||||
|
||||
|
30
textfiles.com/100/bc760mod.ham
Normal file
30
textfiles.com/100/bc760mod.ham
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
Msg#: 1 *VHF/UHF RADIO*
|
||||
03-29-88 10:19:30
|
||||
From: JOHN STOVER
|
||||
To: ALL
|
||||
Subj: BC950 CMT
|
||||
Newest from Uniden/Bearcat, the BC950 XLT (also know as the BC780XLT) can be
|
||||
modified for CMT coverage. Cut pin 20 of the main CPU at the PCB and lift it.
|
||||
Then solder a bridge between pins 19 and 20. This will restore CMT coverage.
|
||||
PROBLEM: If you have the CTCSS option installed, you will not be able to turn
|
||||
it off! (The CTCSS option, that is.) If this is OK with you, then go for it,
|
||||
otherwise consider which you need more, CMT or CTCSS! Also, the only known
|
||||
difference between the two aforementioned scanners is that the 950 is labeled
|
||||
(on the box) "Scanner World". Have fun!
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Date: WEDNESDAY 02/15/89 08:49:47 EDT
|
||||
From: <watmath!julian!business.uwo.ca!bitlib>
|
||||
Subject: 760XLT MODS
|
||||
To: whutt!TGC168 (TIMOTHY G CULVER +1 201 386 7187)
|
||||
|
||||
Netlanders:
|
||||
|
||||
Concerning the Uniden Bearcat 760xlt, the mod for the 950xlt does work
|
||||
to restore lost freq. Disconnect pin 20 of the microprocessor from the
|
||||
circuit board and connect it to pin 19. I bent the pin slightly and cut
|
||||
it with the scissors of a swiss army knife then soldered an 1/8 lead
|
||||
cut from a cap across the pins near the top of the chip. I've yet to
|
||||
find any problem with this mod. But as always do so at your own risk.
|
||||
73 Mike WA2E @ K2DLJ
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user