info/mirror-textfiles.com
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/opsxcq/mirror-textfiles.com.git synced 2025-08-08 07:36:48 +02:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

update

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
OPSXCQ
2017-12-14 20:14:52 -03:00
parent 3e05baa1b7
commit f46be06d02
453 changed files with 103325 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

163
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-47.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 47
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
GLORIA IN EXCELSIS
==================
[CN transcript of remarks by west coast researcher Dave Emory.]
[...continued...]
In a miscellaneous archive show entitled "Gloria in Excelsis"
(subtitled "The CIA, the Women's Movement, and the News Media"),
Gloria Steinem's many intelligence contacts were described in
considerable depth. The main intersection between Steinem and
the CIA is Steinem's role as co-founder, and at one point
director, of an organization called the Independent Research
Service: this is a CIA-financed student organization which has
been used in a number of different capacities. We also noted
that Ms. magazine itself, which had Steinem as editor, has as a
principal stockholder Katherine Graham of the Washington Post.
The Graham publishing empire, and the Washington Post in
particular, [are] inextricably linked with the Central
Intelligence Agency, as we looked at in the book *Katherine the
Great* by Debra Davis. It should also be noted that the first
publisher of Ms. magazine was a woman named Elizabeth Forsling
Harris, who arranged many of the key Dallas details for President
Kennedy's motorcade route.
By way of further exploring Gloria Steinem's CIA background --
specifically, her role with the Independent Research Service --
we're gonna take a look at some information now which comes from
a book entitled *The Pied Piper* (subtitled "Allard K. Lowenstein
and the Liberal Dream.") This was authored by Richard Cummings.
The book was published in hardcover by Grove Press, Inc., in New
York. And it's copyright 1985.
Of Gloria Steinem and her involvement with the Independent
Research Service, and in turn the Independent Research Service's
involvement with disrupting the Vienna Youth Festival (which had
very strong Socialist and Communist participation), author
Cummings writes as follows:
The Independent Service for Information on the Vienna Youth
Festival, which was technically founded by Gloria Steinem
and Paul Sigmund, and which came to be known as the
Independent Research Service, was funded by the
Independence Foundation, one of the conduits of CIA funds
into the National Students Association [NSA]. In 1965, it
was the Independence Foundation which leased its posh
offices in Washington to the NSA [National Students
Association], signing a 15-year rent-free agreement.
The Independent Service diligently recruited hundreds of
American students to attend the 1959 Vienna festival and
later, the 1962 Communist-backed Helsinki festival, to
oppose the Communists as vigorously as possible. According
to Eugene Theroux, who served as chairman of the
metropolitan New York region chapter of NSA in 1958, the
Americans went "to cause trouble."
I would note here also, more about the activities of the
Independent Research Service, the CIA-financed student
organization, co-founded by Gloria Steinem. And we're gonna look
at, in addition to the glance we just took at the Independent
Research Service's work in disrupting not only the 1959 Vienna
festival but also the 1962 Helsinki festival, we're gonna look
at plans of some of these same elements and individuals to
disrupt a conference that had been scheduled for Algeria in 1965.
This conference was cancelled. But had it not been cancelled it
might very well have been disrupted by the aforementioned Eugene
Theroux. And one of the people who is aiding Theroux was the
aforementioned Allard Lowenstein, a former Dean of Students for
Stanford University, and Gloria Steinem presiding over the same
mileau once again.
Turning again to Richard Cummings, *The Pied Piper* (Allard
Lowenstein and the Liberal Dream), we find,
Another Communist-backed youth festival was planned by the
IUS for the summer of 1965 in Algiers, and Lowenstein made
preparations to go there in order to disrupt it. Planning
to join him this time was Paul Theroux's brother, Eugene,
who as a NSA leader in 1958 had met Lowenstein and been
inspired by him to work on behalf of southwest Africa and
black students in the south. Eugene Theroux had been
recruited in 1965 by Gloria Steinem to work for the CIA
front, Independent Research Service. They were to be part
of a delegation to "cause trouble," as Theroux puts it, or
to "engage people in debate," as he corrects himself.
And again, as noted, the 1965 conference never came off. But we
find some of the same elements: Lowenstein, Steinem, Theroux, et
al., planning to disrupt this conference as they had the 1962
Helsinki conference and the 1959 conference in Vienna as well.
It should be noted that a number of other prominent liberals have
intersected with this same mileau, this CIA mileau which involves
Gloria Steinem. Among those are William Sloan Coffin(sp?), one
of the leaders of the anti-war movement, himself a chaplain from
Yale University, himself also, for several years, a CIA agent.
We took a look at William Sloan Coffin and his intersection with
the CIA in discussions from the book, *The Man Who Kept the
Secrets* (about Richard Helms.) That's authored by Thomas
Powers. William Sloan Coffin's CIA background described there.
As we shall see, William Sloan Coffin intersecting with the
mileau involving people like Allard Lowenstein and Gloria
Steinem and, as we shall see, current Massachusetts congressman
Barney Frank, who also worked with Gloria Steinem and the
CIA-sponsored Independent Research Service.
Returning once again to *The Pied Piper*, by Richard Cummings.
It is known that the CIA had established centers on the
campuses of many American universities. In his recruiting
efforts at some of these universities, Lowenstein was
working with people who had been affiliated with the CIA or
had participaated in CIA-sponsored projects. William Sloan
Coffin at Yale, whom Lowenstein wanted to head the summer
project, had worked for the CIA. Barney Frank at Harvard
had been with the Independent Research Service delegation
to Helsinki, an operation which, by Frank's own admission,
he clearly understood was CIA-backed. Frank jokes about
the role of fellow delegate Gloria Steinem, whom he
describes as running around at nightclubs set up by the CIA
in Helsinki, helping to win over Africans from the
Communists.
And again, this little section here is going to go into the
aforementioned miscellaneous archive show, "Gloria in Excelsis:
CIA, the Women's Movement, and the News Media." That is already
on file with Archives on Audio [PO Box 170023, San Francisco, CA
94117-0023; phone: 415-346-1840]. And this particular section
of the program is going to go in as an addendum to that
particular broadcast.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.europa.com/~johnlf/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

153
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-48.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 48
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
THE COVERUP QUILT
=================
From tburkett@clark.netMon Oct 14 20:45:06 1996
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 96 11:52:53 -0500
From: Tom Burkett <tburkett@clark.net>
To: Brian Redman <bigred@duracef.shout.net>
Subject: Coverup Quilt
The Coverup Quilt
Parents Against Corruption and Coverup (PACC) invites you to
participate in creating a memorial to our loved ones who have
been murdered and denied justice because of flawed investigations
or coverups. If all of us surviving families contribute squares
to honor our lost children, spouses, siblings or parents, The
Coverup Quilt will be a vivid symbolic representation of the
extent of the coverup problem in the United States. The squares
will symbolize the anguish we feel individually as we grieve and
fight for justice and honest investigations. Most of our fellow
citizens are blissfully ignorant of the extent of the coverup
problem and the pain it causes surviving families. Words alone
cannot make them understand. Yet we need their understanding and
help in asking Congress for legitimate investigations. The
Coverup Quilt can speak volumes for us!
Materials: 362 X 362 square of cotton or cotton blend fabric in
color of your choice (solid or print) 362 X 362 square of
unbleached muslin (for backing) Any of the following for letters
and designs: contrasting/coordinating fabrics for applique,
embroidery yarn, iron-on letters, stencils, embroidery paints,
permanent markers, hand made letters, fabric paints, beading,
sewing notions, other methods and materials of your choice to
design your square as you like; photo transfer is fine, materials
which create texture are fine; wonder-under is useful in making
adhesive backed fabric)
Directions: Prewash fabric to eliminate shrinking and prevent
color from running later. Your finished, seamed quilt square
will measure 342 X 342 . On paper or poster board of this size,
draw a rough pattern showing how you will position your designs
and lettering. The letters should be readable from some
distance, so they need to be around 2 1/2 to 5 inches high and
contrast significantly with the color of your square. Measure
the width of your letters, keeping in mind the width of your
square, and plan accordingly so everything fits the way you want
it to. Your loved one's name should appear on the square, along
with dates of birth and death (years alone are fine, or
month/day/year) and any other desired sentiment. Include designs
symbolizing things he/she liked, did well, etc. Once you are
satisfied with your plan, you can sew, iron, embroidery, paint,
stencil, applique, quilt or otherwise put your letters and
designs on the right side of the colored (can be white) fabric.
Next, hand or machine stitch the muslin backing to your newly
designed square, making an inside seam of 1/22 to 3/4 all around,
so finished size is 342 X 342. If you machine stitch, place
right sides of the fabrics together, stitch around three sides,
turn right side out, and hand stitch the 4th side. Do not put
batting between the square and the muslin backing. Next, with a
double thread, tack the designed square to the backing in four
places as follows: from each top corner, measure across
approximately 10 inches, then down ten inches, and make a single
tacking stitch. Knot should be on the muslin backing, not on
your designed square. From each bottom corner, measure across
approximately 10 inches, then up ten inches and place your
tacking stitch. Knot should be on muslin backing. Make your
square sturdy, so the quilt can be displayed several times on the
mall, and at nearby college campuses. Dates will be announced in
The Bulldog.
Last, Mail or Fed Ex square (By Nov 21) to:
Beth George & Tom Burkett / PACC
13456 Muirkirk Lane
Herndon VA 20171
Questions?
call (703) 435 3112
or e-mail: tburkett@clark.net or tburkett@aol.com
Squares can't be returned, so take a photo.
All squares will be kept safe!
Volunteers Needed
Interspersed with squares honoring our loved ones, (or maybe in a
separate section of the quilt) we want to place a few squares
representing earmarks of faulty investigations leading to the
"suicide" and "accidental" rulings in these cases where there is
evidence of foul play and agencies involved do not answer
legitimate questions. Whether the ruling is military or
civilian, the earmarks are the same: no interviewing of
witnesses, no tests for gunpowder residue, no ballistics tests,
lost or destroyed evidence, sham autopsies, discrepancies in
reports, forgeries, lost body parts, unexplained injuries,
stalling, lying, complicity, discrediting the victim and/or the
inquiring survivors, etc. And of course, the most common line
used in all coverups : They're just grief-stricken parents who
can't accept a suicide. We have all heard the same script.
If you are creative and have a little extra time, please make an
extra square representing/ symbolizing one or more of these
common threads running through all of our cases. (Did I miss
some?)
Can you do an extra square?
Call: (703) 435-3112
e-mail: tburkett @clark.net or tburkett@aol.com
write:
Beth and Tom (PACC)
13456 Muirkirk Lane
Herndon VA 20171
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tommy had things he wanted to do.
Tom Burkett & Beth George
(703) 435-3112 (Voice/Fax)
http://www.clark.net/pub/tburkett/pacc/PACC.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.europa.com/~johnlf/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

111
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-49.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 49
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
THE FALL OF JUDGE DUFF
======================
When the Gods Fall, the Earth Trembles
--------------------------------------
Past commentaries by Sherman H. Skolnick of the Citizens'
Committee to Clean Up the Courts contain mention of a "Judge
Brian Barnett Duff." Recall, for example, this excerpt from CN
9.07:
Called BNL, it had records of Iraqi strongman Saddam
Hussein and his secret private joint business dealings with
his partner, an American. A close crony of the Federal
Reserve, Chicago Federal District Judge Brian Barnett Duff,
ordered the return of any records from the Banking
Committee, then headed by a Democrat, Rep. Henry Gonzalez
(D., Texas).
The House Banking Committee was an intervening
party-litigant in the controversy. Judge Duff so opposed
the House Banking Committee's efforts to get those records,
that the Judge would not listen to the Committee's
attorney; did not want the attorney in the Judge's
courtroom, the Judge calling him an 800 pound gorilla
showing no respect for the court.
As background to a detailed story by Mr. Skolnick, now in my
possession, I call attention to an article in the Chicago Tribune
of October 11, 1996 ("Beleagured judge steps down from U.S.
bench").
According to the Tribune article, "U.S. District Judge Brian Duff
resigned Thursday after more than a decade of erratic behavior on
the bench." Why did Duff resign? Mr. Skolnick describes Duff as
raving and ranting "like he had just escaped from a nut house" at
one hearing. Says U.S. District Judge Marvin Aspen, Duff "has a
legitimate physical disability." According to Mr. Skolnick, it
had become "widely known and understood that Judge Duff is
certifiably insane, and has a psychiatric disability."
It should be noted that mental illness is a complex disease and
that those who suffer from it ought not to be stigmatized. Many
of the so-called "mentally ill" are able to live normal lives,
and indeed, some experts in the field (such as R.D. Laing, for
example) characterize so-called "insanity" as in fact being
"hyper sanity" -- meaning that those so labeled are actually
*superior* in "sanity" to most.
However, that having been said, it is troubling that so many
cases involving the lives and well-being of many have apparently
been profoundly influenced, if not in fact decided, by a judge
apparently not in full possession of his faculties. The fall of
Judge Duff raises troubling questions as to past cases over which
he has presided.
Some interesting vignettes from the Tribune article:
** Duff reportedly demanded a meeting with Illinois
Governor Jim Edgar, and threatened the outcome of pending
cases unless Edgar complied.
** Duff issued a gag order on lawyers in one case, and
warned, "If I find someone talking to the press, I'm going
to bore them a new orifice."
** The judge arrested his court clerk and fined her $20
reportedly because the clerk had handed a file to Duff "in
the wrong way."
** During one particular sentencing, Judge Duff
pontificated on "temptation" and revealed to the court that
once, on an airplane, the flight attendant had "looked
mighty fine."
According to the Tribune article, "Sources said that the matter
[of Duff's resignation] was so sensitive that [U.S. Attorney
James] Burns warned his entire office that if word of the
complaint leaked out, violators would be fired."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.europa.com/~johnlf/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

122
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-50.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 50
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
AL GORE TO SUSPEND ELECTION AND ARREST GEORGE BUSH?
===================================================
Commentary By Sherman H. Skolnick, 10/16/96
-------------------------------------------
Hi! Sherman Skolnick, Citizens' Committee to Clean Up the
Courts, 9800 S. Oglesby Avenue [Chicago, IL 60617].
The Clinton White House scandals are reaching the explosion
point -- at least some well-informed folks believe that. The
criminal indictments naming Hillary Rodham Clinton are already
reportedly handed up, in sealed form, by one or more federal
grand juries conducted by Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr.
The Democrats, however, are blackmailing Starr, who they say is a
front for the Republicans. They say that if the indictments are
released prior to the November election that President Clinton
will resign within 24 hours. In taking over the Presidency, Al
Gore will then confirm that there *are* scandals involving the
Clintons. According to members of Al Gore's family who verify
this, Gore will declare an emergency, suspending the election and
immediately ordering the arrest of former-President George Bush
for treason -- Bush being implicated in the massive smuggling
into the United States of dope, flooding California and other
population centers.
A similar scenario is [apparently likely] if Clinton is
re-elected and Hillary is named in an indictment to be released
after the election.
As a result of Gore's people talking about all this, Bush is
staying close to airports so he can quickly flee the United
States and take up refuge in a foreign country having no
extradition arrangements with the United States, such as Ireland
and Brazil.
Some of the background of George Bush and his circle of thieves:
Former CIA Director William Colby was very knowledgeable of a
high-level group arranging massive dope smuggling into the United
States from the Golden Triangle of Southeast Asia. That included
George Bush, General Colin Powell, and their crony Richard
Armitage, former Pentagon official.
Now one of the reasons why William Colby was "snuffed out" and
made to look as if he was a victim of a so-called "boat accident"
is this: some of the dope loot is reportedly washed through
Household International and Household Bank, headquartered in the
Chicago suburb of Prospect Heights.
Also, Bush committed treason in 1980 by arranging, in Europe,
with the Iranians, to delay the release of the U.S. hostages so
the Reagan-Bush ticket could grab the White House by wrecking
Jimmy Carter's bid for re-election. By delaying the release of
the hostages they made Carter seem to be a wimp. The hostages
were released a few moments after Reagan was sworn in as the new
President in January '81.
So, Bush and Clinton are both CIA. And, in 1992, Bush had a
secret understanding with Bill Clinton: No mention of the
Iran-Contra affair. Bush, Ollie North, and Clinton while he was
Arkansas Governor -- all three implicated in the massive CIA dope
smuggling into the United States through the southern states, and
particularly, through the airport at Mena, Arkansas.
George Bush's family has been deeply involved in the dope trade
-- such as a son in Florida, part of the dope being brought in
through a military airport there. Another son laundered dope and
similar loot through Silverado Savings and Loan in Denver, which
collapsed at great expense to the taxpayers.
And Gore's people know that the White House Travel Office has
records going back to Dallas, 1963, identifying who it is that
steered President Kennedy's motorcade into a hairpin turn right
by the Dallas Book Depository building and the grassy knoll, so
JFK could have his brains blown out by triangulation shooting,
military style.
So all this can create a national emergency.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
For a heavy packet of printed stories by Citizens' Committee to
Clean Up the Courts, send $5 and a stamped, self-addressed,
business-size envelope, with 3 stamps on it, to Citizens'
Committee to Clean Up the Courts, 9800 S. Oglesby Ave., Chicago,
IL 60617. *caveat emptor*.
Note also that Skolnick's area code is now or imminently changing
to 773.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.europa.com/~johnlf/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

93
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-51.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 51
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
HILLARY NOT SO BAD AFTER ALL
============================
Okay, I hope you're seated. Feeling calm? Good. Say, have you
lost some weight? You look 10 years younger.
It has been this editor's perception that Hillary Rodham
Clinton's main problem is just that she hooked up with the wrong
guy, i.e. Bill "The Weasel" Clinton. Hillary started out as a
committed idealist, even though her ideals were misguided. In
the 1960s, she was good friends with Saul Alinsky, the noted
rebel and radical organizer. She really believed that 1960s
stuff and even still has stars in her eyes. (Like many of her
generation, she is still "lost in the '60s.")
But she went wrong teaming up with Mr. Bill. Alas, what's a girl
to do? She couldn't "grow up to be President," but she could
marry the fourth stooge, Big Goofy Clinton, achieve power, then
save the world.
But along the way, a lot of Goof Clinton's sleaze rubbed off on
her. Now she's got apparent legal troubles waiting to pounce and
send her up the river, to Club Fed, for golfing and light
exercise.
Don't agree? David Brock, author of *The Seduction of Hillary
Rodham*, paints a similar picture to that of this editor. A
review in the Washington Times National Weekly Edition (10/20/96)
describes Brock as seeing "the first lady as a victim of her
husband's actions."
Brock, according to the Washington Times, began writing the book
18 months ago, expecting to end up with a book unsympathetic to
Ms. Clinton. Yet the opposite occurred. Responding to upset
right-wingers, salivating in anticipation of a hatchet job then
bitterly disappointed at the final result, Brock asks, "What do
people want me to do? Do they want me to make things up?"
Of course Brock may have been sucked in by a type of feminist
propaganda portraying all womyn's difficulties as to be blamed on
the Male Oppressor(tm). Is Hillary just a poor victim really,
just a poor little thing who couldn't help herself? Some womyn
push that image of the poor helpless female, victimized by the
evil male and in desperate need of Big Brother to come save her.
So which is it? Are women really tough as a man and can face the
music when the chips are down? Or do they go crying to "daddy"
that it's all "Jimmy's" fault, that "Jimmy made me do it?" You
can't have it both ways: either women are able to stand on their
own two feet come Hell or high water, or they're not. So which
will Hillary do when push comes to shove? Will she do the "poor
helpless female" bit, or will she "take it like a man?"
My bet is that Brock has been suckered by the "damsel in
distress" archetype (but not necessarily tricked into it.) His
book paves the way for a post-indictment Hillary to avoid jail,
letting her blame it all on Male Oppressor(tm) and Male
Seducer(tm) Bill "The Weasel" Clinton. But Hillary's got some
guts I think so she might do something really brave like stand on
her own two feet.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.europa.com/~johnlf/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

137
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-52.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 52
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
GREAT BRITAIN: PUPPET-MASTER OF ISRAEL?
=======================================
In reading Count von Reventlow's *Vampire of the Continent*, I
became intrigued by the idea that so-called "Zionism" is in fact
a disguise for British imperialism. Admittedly, von Reventlow, a
German writing in 1916 when British-German relations were not
good, has an anti-British bias. Nevertheless, I felt that the
author may have "lurched into the truth" regarding one possible
disguise for British imperialism.
On October 19, 1996, Sherman H. Skolnick treated this editor to a
feast at the River Flame restaurant in Calumet City, Illinois. I
posed this question: "I read this book by a Count von Reventlow.
He wrote a book called *Vampire of the Continent* back in 1916.
He's maybe biased, because he's a German, but as I recall he says
that the Zionist movement is really a British thing, that Britain
wanted to colonize that area." Here is Mr. Skolnick's response:
You've got to understand something: the so-called leading
Israeli chemists are all British-trained Jews. And the
banks of Israel that operate in Chicago, those are
British-founded banks. And the way to get an Israeli or
American Jew to scream is to tell the truth:
"Oh, I'm a Jew. I'm going to put money in the Bank
Leumi."
"It's not an Israeli bank. It's a British bank."
"Where did you hear that!? I own 100 shares in the
bank."
"But what about the idea that so-called 'Zionism,' behind that is
British imperialism?" I asked.
Did you read my Declaration and Counter-Verification in the
Hillary case? (Where I told a little bit about that.) How
did I get into so much trouble with some of the prominent
Jews like Amy Zisook and her husband? For pointing out
that ordinary Jews like me, who our elders always taught
that there's Jews and there's non-Jew Jews -- there's
*Hofjuden*, a German term for "court Jew." They may have
been a Jew when they were a child, but they became a
Catholic or something else.
A person named Ehrlich(sp?) wrote a book, *The Changing of
the Jewish Guard on Wall Street*. That book, that came out
4 or 5 years ago, pointed out that the Wall Street bond
houses have not been actual Judaism-following Jews for
three generations. They are now Catholics, Episcopalians,
and Lutherans. But they still call themselves Robert
Rubin, this, that, and the other -- Jewish names. They are
not Jews.
Right wingers say, "Oh! All these Jews are controlling
everything!" I did a program in '94 that got me up on the
sh** list. I pointed out some things, that there are two
types of Jews: there's common Jews like me, and there's
Sephardic Jews -- converted. They're not Jews. They've
got Jewish names, but they're not Jews. They're acceptable
to the Establishment. And if something goes wrong, they
make a big scandal, they throw him out, and they says, "Oh!
Did you see that? That 'Jew' is the cause of it."
Like Judge Posner representing the Rockefellers. He's the
Chief Judge now of the federal Appeals Court. He's a
*Hofjuden*. He's a Jew acceptable to the Establishment,
who does not follow Judaism. He continues with the Jewish
name; does not tell the world, "Hey, I'm no longer a Jew."
And if something goes wrong: to the wall with him. A
*Hofjuden*, a throwaway person.
I dared to point this out, and the Defamation League and
everybody went after me like I was Adolf Hitler. And I
tried, in a nice way, to explain it. The principal Jews
who suffered in the concentration camps were not from
Germany, they were from the satellite countries: Poland,
the Balkans. There weren't that many Jews in Germany.
Most of them fled, and they're in Chicago, New York, and
elsewhere, with big money. Most of them are not practicing
Jews: they believe in cremation, they believe in Catholic
music in their synagogues. You go into a reformed
German-Jewish temple, you wouldn't know, with the stained
glass windows and the organ, whether you're in a Catholic
church or a synagogue.
On the other hand, Zionists need not be Jews. Zionism is
simply a homeland in the middle of all the rest. Britain
set up trans-Jordan (now called Jordan) and Palestine to
irritate the Arabs and keep them off-balance for the oil
business. That's the reason that they allowed Jonathan
Pollard, with the help of [Vince] Foster, to give 'em the
nuclear missile secrets. Why? So that Israel could
threaten not only the Arabs, but the Soviets.
Do you see the point? Israel started out with a
million-and-a-half people (they've got 5 million now),
they're surrounded by 50 million Arabs. How do you control
all these Arabs? Put the so-called "Zionists" in the
middle to irritate them. And you give them the nuclear
stuff. Nobody points this out. Because, when anyone
points this out, they says, "Oh! You're a renegade Jew."
They go after you -- the Amy Zisooks of the world -- they
go after you. Why? They don't want "family secrets" to be
dragged out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.europa.com/~johnlf/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

427
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-53.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,427 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 53
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
OCTOBER SURPRISE
================
(From the September 1996 Conspiracy Nation Newsletter)
In 1980, fifty-two American hostages were being held by Iran.
The President at that time was Jimmy Carter. He was being
challenged in his bid for re-election by the Reagan-Bush ticket.
Though Reagan-Bush led in the polls, they secretly feared that
Carter would stage what was called an "October Surprise." The
Republicans feared that if Carter were to bring about the release
of the American hostages in late October, subsequent national
euphoria would boost Carter in the polls and get him re-elected.
So, according to numerous and disparate witnesses and
investigators, the Reagan-Bush faction initiated secret
negotiations with the Iranians. The deal reportedly was that if
the Iranians would ignore Carter administration overtures, the
Republicans would give the Iranians an especially good deal
later, when Reagan-Bush came to power.
Some may say, "Well, Congress looked into these allegations and
found nothing there." But that is like saying that the Columbo
crime family looked into the Genovese mafia and concluded,
"They're not such a bad bunch of guys." Congress has also looked
into the strange death of White House deputy counsel Vincent
Foster -- twice -- and concluded that Foster committed suicide
right where his body was found in Fort Marcy Park. So if
Congress is so infallible, why is Special Prosecutor Kenneth
Starr now also investigating the Foster death? And why do
two-thirds of Americans not believe what the Congress keeps
telling them, vis-a-vis Foster?
Gary Sick served on the National Security Council staff under
Presidents Ford, Carter, and Reagan. Sick was the principal
White House aide for Iran during the hostage crisis of 1979-81.
He was skeptical at first, regarding the October Surprise
allegations, yet gradually found that
A reality that I thought I knew well turned out to be
little more than a facade. I had to utterly reevaluate
whole constellations of events, even those that I had
experienced personally...
[Sick had thought that] The events of 1980 could be
explained adequately without resort to what I considered to
be a conspiracy theory...
[Yet] As time went on, seemingly inexplicable fragments of
information began to appear. My experience was not unlike
that of a medieval scholar discovering traces of a hidden
text beneath the script on an old parchment.
Sick is cautious when he writes, in his book, October Surprise,
that "there is not enough evidence at this point to launch a
prosecution," yet he obviously feels that the October Surprise
story is grounded in fact: "If the evidence presented in this
book means what it seems to mean, we must conclude that in 1980 a
deception was inflicted on the hostages, the government, and the
American people that has few if any parallels in our history.
That evidence is not easily dismissed."
Not so cautious as Sick has been Ari Ben-Menashe, who worked for
the Israeli intelligence agency, the Mossad, before he surfaced
to write a tell-all book, Profits of War (1991). Ben-Menashe
says he was part of a team which worked with the French to
arrange secret meetings between George Bush, William Casey, and
the Iranians. At one particular meeting in Paris, on October 19,
1980, a final agreement allegedly was concluded: In exchange for
a $40 million bribe and future arms shipments, the Iranians
agreed not to release the American hostages until the January
1981 Presidential inauguration. This, in fact, did happen; the
52 hostages were released on January 20, 1981.
Barbara Honegger worked for the Reagan administration in the
White House Office of Policy Development. She worked there for 3
years before she became "the first resignation of conscience from
the Reagan-Bush Administration." She held off from publishing
her book, October Surprise, until 1989, due to a sense of loyalty
she felt toward Ronald Reagan.
Honegger points out that George Bush had been a Director of CIA
and, as such, had plenty of covert connections and know-how with
which to implement secret dealings between the Republicans and
Iran. Many in CIA hated Jimmy Carter for downsizing the Agency
and were eager for revenge. Honegger, like Gary Sick, is
cautious; throughout her book she refers to the October Surprise
story as "allegations." Yet her evidence leads overwhelmingly to
the reality of the October Surprise conspiracy.
For example, Honegger points to the many witnesses who have gone
public concerning the affair. While some might consider these
CIA contract agents to be shady characters and therefore not
sterling witnesses, she asks: Why didn't this body of witnesses
ever get to tell their stories to the American people? Writes
Honegger: "As an independent journalist, I believe profoundly in
the right of the American public to hear from all parties who
claim to have information on charges as serious as that an
arms-for-hostage-delay deal was made between the Reagan-Bush
campaign and Iran."
So why didn't we hear all sides of the story? After all, in a
democracy it is supposed that the public can think for itself,
and do not need to be shielded from witnesses which some
self-appointed authority decides are "not credible." By what
right do the few have such control over what the many are allowed
to hear?
Rodney Stich, in his classic and definitive book on government
corruption, Defrauding America (1-800-247-7389), suggests part of
the reason information is withheld, diminished, or twisted -- The
CIA's Media Wurlitzer.
The CIA has many media personnel on its payroll to plant
stories or discredit charges against the CIA. It pays out
large sums of money for articles and books to be written on
the CIA's behalf. Its control over the media is like a
Wurlitzer, orchestrating and manipulating all segments of
the written or broadcast media. It must be remembered that
the CIA has iron-clad control over the establishment media
in the United States, and spends money supporting
journalists and the media.
In light of the July 1996 issue of this newsletter ("The Smiling
Pope"), it is noteworthy that Ms. Honegger goes into the
Propaganda Due, or P-2, connection. You'll recall that P-2 is a
secret, illegal Masonic lodge founded in Italy by Licio Gelli in
1966. Honegger points to Alexander Haig, later to become the
Secretary of State under Ronald Reagan, as having been made an
"honorary" (non-Italian) member of P-2 prior to 1980. Honegger
further states that Licio Gelli, finance wizard Michele Sindona,
Alexander Haig, and CIA Director William Casey "were also
reportedly members of the Vatican's military order, the Knights
of Malta, whose initiates must take an oath of allegiance to the
Pope." Furthermore, P-2 is linked to the Mafia, which also seems
to have played a part in the October Surprise plot; writes
Honegger: "A number of press reports, taken together, suggest
that there may have been a P-2 and Gambino Mafia connection to
the release of the fifty-two American hostages from the U.S.
embassy in Tehran."
(By the way, in light of the July issue of this newsletter, "The
Smiling Pope," I recommend the movie, "The Godfather, Part 3.")
Abol Hassan Bani-Sadr was president of Iran during the hostage
crisis. As of 1991, he was living in exile, in Paris. In his
book, My Turn To Speak, Bani-Sadr corroborates the October
Surprise allegations.
While some may wonder why Iran would have negotiated with "the
Great Satan," i.e., the United States, it now appears that this
rhetoric served mainly to help unite a fractious Iran against a
common enemy. (Such techniques are used here in the U.S., where
the government uses the Big Enemy technique to rally support --
for example, Big Enemies such as Russia, narcotics, and now,
increasingly, supposed omnipresent terrorists.) Writes
Bani-Sadr: "The takeover of the U.S. embassy was wholly in line
with [Ayatollah] Khomeini's strategy of focusing hostility
abroad." Remember too that the U.S. had frozen Iranian funds and
had military spare parts desperately needed by the Iranians.
Former-president Bani-Sadr says he has proof of contacts between
Iran and the Reagan-Bush forces as early as the spring of 1980.
He claims that "the sole purpose of [these contacts] was to
handicap Carter's re-election bid by preventing the hostages'
release before the American elections in November 1980."
The late Paul D. Wilcher was a Washington attorney who
investigated the October Surprise charges. In a 100-page letter
addressed to Attorney General Janet Reno and dated May 21, 1993,
Wilcher offered her a comprehensive look at American "deep
politics." (The term "deep politics," comes from Professor Peter
Dale Scott's penetrating look at the assassination of John F.
Kennedy, Deep Politics and the Death of JFK. Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1993.) One section of Wilcher's
letter to Reno is entitled, "The 'October Surprise' Treason &
Coup D'Etat." (My thanks to a subscriber for sending me this
disturbing document.) Writes Wilcher:
My client here is Gunther Karl Russbacher, a life-long
covert operative for the CIA and the Office of Naval
Intelligence ("ONI") who has operated at the highest levels
of both of these super-secret organizations over the past
30 and 25 years, respectively.
Because of his extremely high intelligence, his exceptional
physical skills, his extensive training, his fluency in 8
languages, his proficiency as one of the CIA's top pilots
and marksmen, and the fact that his father was one of the
original founders (along with William Casey, "Wild Bill"
Donovan, and others) of the Central Intelligence Agency,
back in 1947, Gunther has always operated at the highest
levels of these "intelligence" organizations, and has been
entrusted with carrying out some of their most difficult,
sensitive, and top secret covert operations.
[......]
For the moment, however, I want to focus on one pivotal
event in Gunther's career -- the fact that he was the CIA
pilot who flew George Bush and others (listed below) to and
from Paris on this "October Surprise" weekend, and then
flew George Bush back to America on the CIA's hypersonic
spy plane, the SR-71 -- to get him back home before anyone
would notice that he was gone.
Russbacher says his passengers on the flight to Paris during the
October 19, 1980 weekend, included George Bush, William Casey,
Donald Gregg (later to become Ambassador to South Korea), Robert
Gates (later to become Director of CIA), Robert McFarlane
(President Reagan's National Security Advisor), Robert Allen
(President Reagan's first National Security advisor), Earl Brian
(of later INSLAW notoriety), Jennifer Fitzgerald (reportedly one
of George Bush's mistresses), Congressman Daniel Rostenkowski
(a.k.a. "Rosty," now in jail), Congressman Dan Burton, Senator
Robert Byrd, Senator John Tower, Senator John Heinz, and other
prominent Members of Congress.
Wilcher's letter describes who got what:
The gist of these negotiations (and deal) was that Bush and
Casey delivered to the Iranians $40 million in cash (it
started out as $62 million, but by the time many of the
Americans had dipped their hands into the till, only about
$35 million was left to give to the Iranians), basically as
bribe money, plus the promise of $5 billion more in illegal
arms sales and spare parts... in exchange for the Iranians'
agreement not to release the 52 American hostages captured
in Tehran on November 4th, 1979, until after the November
4th, 1980, U.S. Presidential election -- in order to
guarantee the humiliation and defeat of then-President
Jimmy Carter, and the victory of Ronald Reagan and George
Bush.
The important point to remember about this flight, and all
those who were participating in it, is that the entire
exercise was a carefully planned, and well executed CIA
covert operation -- which had been ordered and sanctioned
at the highest levels of the "Shadow Government" --
specifically for the purpose of taking back control of the
federal government from the Democrats, and returning it to
the CIA and the "Shadow Government."
In other words, this entire operation was -- and was
specifically designed to be -- a treasonous coup d'etat, to
take back control of the federal government from Jimmy
Carter and the Democrats...
Paul Wilcher, by the way, is numbered among the so-called
"Clinton Body Count" -- persons connected to Bill Clinton who
have died mysteriously and/or violently. The story of the
Clinton Body Count was first brought to light by Indianapolis
attorney Linda Thompson. She described how the information was
first intimated to her, by a purported CIA agent, on the February
3rd, 1994 broadcast of Chuck Harder's "For the People" radio
show:
CHUCK HARDER: Now, Linda, you were talking [about]... The
Clinton Body Count. You say 25 people that have surrounded
Bill Clinton, with some type of a personal relationship
with him.....
LINDA THOMPSON: Uh-huh. [Affirmative]
CHUCK HARDER: .....have turned up dead within
approximately the last 12 months.
LINDA THOMPSON: Right.
CHUCK HARDER: Can you name them "off the top of your
head," to the best of your ability?
LINDA THOMPSON: Sure.
CHUCK HARDER: And who were they, and how come, and that
sort of thing.
LINDA THOMPSON: C. Victor Raiser was Bill Clinton's
campaign finance chairman, and his son, who was also very
active in the campaign, Victor Raiser, Jr., were killed in
a plane crash, enroute to Alaska, in July of '92. Now
that's where the body count begins. And it begins there...
I almost didn't include them because I was going to divide
it up into post-Presidency and pre-Presidency. The fellow
that had called me and suggested that I do this was CIA.
And he said, you know, "Do a body count around Clinton."
And I said, "What?!" [He answered,] "Just do one. Do one
before he became President and do one after he became
President." Because I would not have thought of this on my
own. I really... It would never have occurred to me to
even think of doing this.
Besides Wilcher and Raiser, other names amongst the still-growing
Clinton Body Count are: Paul Tully, DNC political director,
heart attack; Paula Gober, worked as Clinton's interpreter for
the hearing-impaired, car crash; Jim Wilhite, friends with Mack
McLarty and Bill Clinton, skiing accident; Vincent Foster, Jr.,
deputy White House counsel, "suicide"; Luther "Jerry" Parks,
owner of a security service which supplied guards for Clinton
during his 1992 presidential campaign, murdered by multiple
gunshots; Jon Parnell Walker, RTC Senior Investigation Specialist
looking into wrongdoing at Madison Guaranty S&L, supposedly
jumped to his death while apartment hunting; Kathy Ferguson, wife
of Danny Ferguson who said he brought sex-accuser Paula Jones to
Bill Clinton's hotel room at which time Clinton is alleged to
have sexually harassed Jones, "suicide" by pistol; Herschel
Friday, a member of C. Victor Raiser's (see above) finance
committee, plane crash; Ed Willey, manager of Clinton's
presidential campaign finance committee, supposedly shot himself
on November 30, 1993; John A. Wilson, a Washington, D.C. city
councilman about to go public with information on Bill Clinton,
"suicide" by hanging; Ron Brown, the late Commerce Secretary,
killed in a suspicious plane crash.
The list contains many more names than the above. I may write a
more detailed account in the future. Readers familiar with the
many violent and/or mysterious deaths of potential witnesses
connected to the JFK assassination will be familiar with the
pattern suggested by the Clinton Body Count. For now, add one
more name to the list of suspicious deaths connected to Bill
Clinton: Susann Coleman. As documented in the book, Clinton
Confidential (by George Carpozi), Ms. Coleman, said to be
pregnant by Bill Clinton, died by "suicide" on February 15, 1977.
Writes Carpozi, "Coleman is purported to have put the muzzle of a
shotgun into her mouth and pulled the trigger."
But how does October Surprise lead to the Clinton Body Count?
The October Surprise coup d'etat led to the 12-year Reagan-Bush
Administration. During that time, the illegal Contra war in
Nicaragua was funded in part by CIA gun- and drug-smuggling via
Arkansas, condoned by then-Governor Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton,
according to Roger Morris, author of Partners in Power, is a
long-time CIA agent. The Arkansas smuggling operation was under
the command of George Bush, himself a former Director of CIA and
long-time agent of that roach hotel. So how does October
Surprise lead to the Clinton Body Count? Well, as we all know,
roaches multiply.
Robert Parry has worked for Associated Press, Newsweek magazine,
and the PBS program, "Frontline." He has been an investigative
reporter for over 20 years. Parry has continued to look into the
October Surprise story, has had a book published on the subject
(Trick or Treason), and recently came up with some startling
information which he published on Internet.
Following a Congressional task force report which debunked the
October Surprise allegations (a report which, writes Parry, rests
on "an elaborate set of alibis"), Parry sought access to the task
force's files. He obtained permission to examine unclassified
papers, stored in a Rayburn building sub-basement, in a converted
Ladies' washroom now used for storage. To Parry's surprise, "Not
only did I find unclassified notes and documents about the task
force's work, but also 'secret' and even 'top secret' papers..."
Parry's study of these documents led him to believe, more firmly
than ever, that the October Surprise plot had indeed occured.
Among the confidential documents that Parry lucked onto was a
six-page Russian report, sent in response to a query by Rep. Lee
Hamilton (D-Ind.) According to Parry, the "Russian report
stated, as fact, that Casey, George Bush and other Republicans
had met secretly with Iranian officials in Europe during the 1980
presidential campaign. The Russians depicted the hostage
negotiations that year as a two-way competition between the
Carter White House and the Reagan campaign to outbid one another
for Iran's cooperation on the hostages. The Russians asserted
that the Reagan team had disrupted Carter's hostage negotiations
after all, the exact opposite of the task force conclusion."
Still don't believe the October Surprise machinations occured?
Tell that to former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir who,
when asked in May of 1993 if there had been an October Surprise,
responded, "of course, it was." Tell that to senior
representatives of Iran's current government, who, writes Parry,
are "amused at how wrong the House task force had been." Tell
that to veteran White House correspondent Sarah McClendon, who,
when I stated to her in late August of 1995, "So you agree with
the story of the 'October Surprise,'" responded:
Oh definitely. There definitely was. And Bush has denied
it all along. And people have seen him in Paris at the
time he claims he wasn't there. They saw him there and
they know he went to the meeting. And I definitely think
the agreement was made there.
An "October Surprise" has also come to have a generic meaning.
According to William Safire, writing in the New York Times on or
about August 20, 1996, "An 'October Surprise,' in political
parlance, is the making of big news to affect a November
election." Safire points to two events which, he says, are "in
the pipeline" -- a possible indictment of Hillary Clinton for
perjury and obstruction of justice, and a possible punitive
strike against Iran in retaliation for allegedly masterminding
the recent bomb attack against a military barracks in Saudi
Arabia.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

513
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-54.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,513 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 54
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A CROOKED FEDERAL JUDGE AND THE OIL RACKETS
===========================================
By Sherman H. Skolnick
----------------------
Here is the scene. It was October, 1990. A half million U.S.
troops were gathering in the Persian Gulf. Joined by a few
thousand troops of our so-called "Allies." One of the great
secrets was how, in the 1980s, U.S., England, France, and Germany
supplied weapons to both Iraq and Iran, to kill each other --
hundreds of thousands died -- in a war that went on for some
eight years, 1980 to 1988.
The Western Powers used the Iraq-Iran war to control the oil from
the Gulf.
Who in 1990 (or even now) knew or remembered that President
George Bush and his cronies were the ones who were kingpins in
making Kuwait a major oil producer? All the way back to 1960,
when Kuwait was a British colony. Kuwait petroleum interests
were big depositors and transacters through the Rockefeller
banks, New York and Chicago. In the U.S., particularly in the
south, Kuwait Petroleum was becoming a big competitor, such as
the chain of retail gas stations, once owned by Gulf Oil, and
then called under the name "Q-8" Gas Stations. Kuwait was
becoming, world-wide, too big a competitor to the Rockefeller oil
cartel, and the companies making up the monopoly with them.
There was a danger that oil prices, by over-production, would go
down, severely damaging the oil trust, called The Seven Sisters.
A really big secret, in 1990, and even now, was that George Bush
was a private joint venture business partner of Iraqi strongman,
Saddam Hussein. Since Bush had been Director of Central
Intelligence, 1975, the CIA created Saddam, by arranging the
political murders of his opponents, including some of his
power-grabbing relatives.
Saddam was the bully boy of the Persian Gulf, where all the other
oil producers secretly agreed to pay him and his cronies 25
percent of all the oil shipped to the West, for the decade 1980
to 1990. That was one trillion dollars worth. The kick-backs to
Saddam and his circle had been 25 billion dollars per year
(average), a total of 250 billion dollars for the decade. Saddam
shared the oil loot with his partner, George Herbert Walker Bush,
and their circle of thieves and extortionists.
The oil kick-backs were funneled through the Chicago branch of
Italy's largest bank, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro [BNL], owned in
part by the Vatican. According to Congressional documents, BNL
was the twin and interlocked with Bank of Credit and Commerce
International [BCCI]. BCCI has been a worldwide crime, political
murder, and espionage operation that became, supposedly, defunct
in 1991. Actually, BCCI has continued on through its successor
and alter ego, Pinnacle Banc Group, whose flag-ship is First
National Bank of Cicero (Chicago mafia enclave suburb). And the
Cicero bank has long been dominated by Bishop Paul Marcinkus,
once heading a church there and up until 1991 head of the Vatican
Bank. (According to an espionage-gangster scandal in Italy, the
Vatican Bank was the center of CIA/mafia gun and dope money
laundering as well as the secret sale of nuclear device parts to
terrorists. The Roger D'Onofrio Affair, a long-time American CIA
official, dual resident in U.S. and near Naples, Italy. Reuters,
Naples, 12/2/95. Associated Press, Naples, 12/2/95. See also my
story called "Clandestine Projects.")
Starting in the early 1980s, BNL and BCCI set up branches in
major cities in the U.S., including Chicago. This was arranged
by partners in the Rose Law Firm in Little Rock and through their
client, Stephens & Co., largest bond brokers worldwide, outside
of Wall Street. Forming the branches required greasing the palms
of state and federal bank regulators and others, around the
country. Facilitating this corruption were two of the Rose Law
Firm partners, Hillary Rodham Clinton and her law partner/lover,
Vincent W. Foster, Jr.
From the early 1980s, Vince Foster was the equivalent of a
military general in the super-secret National Security Agency
[NSA]. With the help of Hillary, he headed up the NSA's bank
computer services spying operation, keeping tabs on bank and
other money laundering worldwide -- both friend and foe.
Hillary Clinton's father, originally from the Chicago suburb of
Park Ridge, was reportedly a middle-level gangster, setting up
money washing through banks and insurance companies, U.S. and
overseas. Hillary being married to William Jefferson Clinton was
a marriage of convenience. From an early age, both had been
separately groomed by CIA through George Bush and others; such as
the CIA London station chief for Bill. To use espionage jargon,
Bill and Hillary were a "CIA couple."
The CIA promoted Bill Clinton from state Attorney General (which
he got from his gangster uncle, Ray Clinton), to be Governor of a
sizeable state with a small population -- Arkansas -- known as
owned by the Rockefellers. Savvy folks contend Bill is the
illegitimate great grandson of old John D. Rockefeller, founder
of the infamous Standard Oil Trust. Arkansas has been one of the
most backward places in the nation, if not in the world -- where
anything goes. In the Iran-Contra period, Governor Clinton kept
his state police from interfering with the CIA's guns & dope
operation through the small airport in western Arkansas, at Mena.
In secluded facilities nearby, in violation of federal aviation
regulations, small shops were set up and operating to re-fit
airplanes secretly with special doors and long-range fuel tanks,
to be used in faraway jungles, like Central America, good for
dropping secret loads of weapons and picking up dope for return
trips to various sites in Arkansas and across the South.
Bill Clinton's mother was the link through Hot Springs, Arkansas,
to the underworld's gambling, extortion, and prostitution
apparatus, which on occasion overlapped CIA. An outpost for
Chicago mobsters was Hot Springs, and they had done favors for
the CIA, such as aiding in the CIA's murder of President Kennedy
in Dallas.
So, in its most simplistic terms, the marriage of Bill and
Hillary Clinton was the joining of two crime families, Chicago
and Hot Springs. A merger authorized for a CIA couple by the spy
agency.
A few related examples: Operating through Chicago to reportedly
wash funds for the CIA, the Vatican Bank, and others, reportedly
has been Coral Re-Insurance, having an unlisted headquarters in
the Barbados. They reportedly money laundered 50 million dollars
of federal funds, part of 58.4 million dollars parked with
Household International and their units Household Bank.
Household, in part dominated by the Vatican, is the successor to
the Nugan Hand Bank, like Household, a CIA proprietary washing
espionage, political murder, and other covert funds. Former CIA
Director William Colby, who mysteriously disappeared and
supposedly whose body was later found, had been general counsel
of Nugan Hand Bank which supposedly became defunct following the
murder of one of its founders. Colby had a similar role for the
Nugan Hand Bank alter ego, Household.
As to Nugan Hand Bank, see the book by Jonathan Kwitny, "The
Crimes of Patriots."
I have written extensively of a complex group of state and
federal litigation in Chicago, called the Joseph Andreuccetti
Affair, involving the mysterious 50 million dollar transfer by
Household to Little Rock and from there, to the Grand Caymans
with the aid of Coral Re-Insurance and Fuji Bank.
The mysterious transfer of the 50 million dollars was to cover up
the apparent embezzlement of funds from a federally-insured
outlet, Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan -- some 47 million
dollars for which Bill and Hillary Clinton can be the targets of
federal criminal prosecution. Congressman Dan Burton (R., Ind.)
refers to the strange 50 million dollars transferred by Bill
Clinton to a known dope-money laundering center. (Congressional
Record, 5/29/96, pages H5627-28.) Some quote the congressman as
stating he vows to help put Bill and Hillary Clinton in prison.
A key player in all this was Brian Barnett Duff. In the 1980s,
Duff sat as a judge in the state court in Chicago, the Circuit
Court of Cook County. Later, the Reagan/Bush team installed Duff
as a federal district judge in Chicago. Some knew Duff to be
corrupt, but he escaped while all other local judges were sent to
federal prison in "Operation Greylord" (touched off by our work.)
One thing is for sure: Duff was subject to blackmail, a key
reason someone is selected for high office (an unfortunate
American reality.) At any moment, Duff could be whisked away to
the funny farm. On the bench, he had outbursts where he wanted
to jail the more-independent lawyers for no particular reason.
In routine cases, lawyers knew they had to grovel before him or
he would suddenly go nuts and start threatening one or more
lawyers and others.
Some just imagined Duff as some psychiatric ward inmate who
somehow escaped to high federal office. Duff acted the part and
was there to be used and blackmailed.
A case that should have been labeled a blackmailer's
dream-come-true was on U.S. District Judge Duff's docket in
October, 1990. (You are wrong if you really believe cases get on
a particular judge's docket by so-called "random selection." To
make a long story short, court corruption requires a corrupt
Court Clerk's office. A top federal Court Clerk's Office
official ended up in jail because of our work, in 1969, U.S. vs.
Robert P. Steine.)
All of the foregoing almost unraveled, worldwide, but was hushed
up -- a series of events in October, 1990.
A Texas Democrat, in some ways seeming to be a populist, was
Henry B. Gonzalez. As a very long-time congressman, he headed up
the House Banking Committee. As part of an investigation of the
twin banks, BNL and BCCI, Cong. Gonzalez sought the records of
the Chicago branch of BNL. A custodian of copies of some of
those records was the Federal Reserve Board who began giving them
to the congressman's committee.
Alarmed when they found out, the Bush/Saddam Hussein gang
instigated the Illinois State Banking Commissioner, which
regulated the BNL Chicago branch, to start an injunction suit in
federal district court in Chicago which by corrupt means was
assigned to Judge Duff, a crony of Bush. People of the State of
Illinois ex rel. William C. Harris, Bank Commissioner vs. Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Case No. 90 C 6863.
Because they were the focus of the litigation, becoming an
intervening party was the House Banking Committee.
In one of his rulings, Judge Duff sought to bar Gonzalez's House
Banking Committee lawyer from Judge Duff's courtroom. In one of
his psychiatric outbursts, apparently brought on by blackmail
pressure against him, Judge Duff referred to the lawyer as an 800
pound gorilla showing no deference to Judge Duff. In other plain
words, get the hell out of my courtroom and out of this
courthouse: this matter is already "fixed," by Bush and others,
and why are you here?
(A key development: while the case was pending, the Illinois
Attorney General, representing the Banking Commissioner in
federal court, changed from GOP to Democrat. They half-heartedly
proceeded to push the case.)
Unless Congressman Gonzalez was prepared to sign -- and he wasn't
-- a national security oath of some sort that he would not reveal
the BNL Chicago records, any records he had were to be returned
and he could not get any more of the bank's records. One of the
exhibits already in the court record is a letter on behalf of
CIA, that the bank's records should not be divulged. The court
record also shows high-level negotiations between top Italian
officials, in Rome, with officials in the U.S. of the Federal
Reserve, regarding that the BNL records should not be disclosed.
Bush's blackmailable crony, Judge Duff, enjoined the release of
the records of BNL. The mass media, themselves interlocked with
crooked banks, dared not send any reporter to cover the case. In
May, 1991, an appeal of the case was heard by a three-judge panel
of the U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit, in Chicago. Most of
the judges on the 7th Circuit court (covering Wisconsin,
Illinois, and Indiana) are interlocked with banks. For example,
chief judge of that court for many years was Judge Walter J.
Cummings, Jr.: his father for years and years was board chairman
of the Continental Bank of Chicago. The Cummings family have
been major owners of that bank, along with the Vatican, the
Rothschilds, and the Queen of England (who always had a
representative of the British royal family on the Continental
board).
That bank, tied to the commodity markets, has all the years been
a center of corrupt secret nominee accounts for judges, to
corruptly influence many federal judges such as in Chicago.
Continental Bank has been the head office for several thousand
correspondent banks. (Formed before the American Civil War, like
the Chicago Board of Trade, Continental was apparently the
transfer point for Rothschild banking empire funds implicated in
the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln.)
The only reporter at the May, 1991, federal appeals court hearing
was myself accompanied by friends. *Where* *was* *the*
*mainstream* *press* *in* *a* *world-shaking* *story* *like*
*this*?
After the hearing, in the back of the courtroom, I interviewed
two participants.
Question: I heard that the secret BNL Chicago records
involved here relate to private, joint business ventures
between George Herbert Walker Bush and his business partner
Saddam Hussein.
Answer: (From a lawyer of the Illinois Attorney General
representing the State Banking Commissioners) Yes, that is
correct.
(To be careful and sure, I asked the same question three times.
Same answer each time.)
Question: Why do the state and federal bank regulators
want these records suppressed?
Answer: Release of the records would undermine the
authority of bank regulators and because of what is
involved here, would cause a worldwide run on banks.
Question: Are you confirming it is that serious, the
possible release of BNL Chicago's records?
Answer: Yes, release of the records would create an
international incident, detrimental to the banks, the
United States, and our international relations.
The bank's records, among other things, show Bush and Saddam
Hussein getting, for the decade of the 1980s, 250 billion dollars
in oil kick-backs from all the Persian Gulf oil producers, or 25
billion dollars per year for a decade -- for the ten years
leading up to the Persian Gulf War.
I then stated: It seems the appeal record is suppressed or
someone wants to suppress it. Whereupon, the lawyer reached into
a leather suitcase and dragged out most of the records and gave
them to me.
I then interviewed the lawyer for the Illinois Banking
Commissioner, that regulates the Chicago branch of BNL. I asked
him the same question as well, three times to be sure, and each
time he answered similar to the first lawyer. He then also
volunteered:
Those records also relate to "non bank" records. He explained
there are records of BNL Chicago that are not exactly bank
records but show George Herbert Walker Bush as the private joint
business venture partner of Saddam Hussein.
The three-judge panel was headed by Judge Richard A. Posner,
later made Chief Judge of the 7th Circuit. Posner, once a law
school teacher at the University of Chicago (founded and operated
by the Rockefeller oil cartel) reportedly represents the one
billion dollar (and more) stock portfolio of the University of
Chicago. (Like the other judges on the federal appeals court in
Chicago -- and other banker-judges around the nation -- Judge
Posner does NOT disqualify himself when his financial interests
are involved. Guess who wins?)
Before becoming a judge on the federal appeals court in Chicago,
Posner ran a court litigation service company described by
reliable sources as reportedly specializing in bribing or
blackmailing federal judges on behalf of major corporations.
After an appeals court hearing, most usually their ruling is made
months later. In the meantime, in this case, after the hearing,
the Bush Justice Department began circulating stories -- but the
press fakers were afraid to go into it and follow it up -- that
Judge Posner had reportedly received bribes in eight other cases.
Funny thing, our group already knew about those eight other
cases, not news to us.
Responding to the bribery blackmail, Judge Posner, in the summer
of 1991, made a strange and rare ruling: that the BNL Chicago
case should not be in this courthouse and should be entirely
removed.
Only a right-wing, conservative newspaper dared publish the
details of all this. ("Spotlight," 8/19/91)
Saddam Hussein's half-brother, in Geneva, Switzerland, has told
European reporters that if Saddam is assassinated by the American
CIA, that records will be released compelling the American
government to prosecute George Bush for treason.
In March, 1996, I did a program on my popular public access cable
TV program in Chicago, called "Broadsides," that Judge Brian
Barnett Duff was observed by me and an associate of mine during a
three-hour hearing in a case involving Chicago City Hall
patronage jobs. A former city employee contended that thousands
of city workers have been defrauded out of amounts that total
into the hundreds of millions. That this was because of a fraud
upon the federal district court in Chicago. Implicit in the
hearing was that Judge Duff was in some way himself a part of the
fraud upon his court. Duff implied that the situation is so
serious, as to the amounts involved, that it could cause city
government of Chicago to declare bankruptcy.
During the lengthy hearing, described on my cable TV show, Judge
Duff raved and ranted like he had just escaped from a nut house.
For a lengthy period he condemned one of the lawyers that had
filed papers about the fraud upon Duff's court in the city
patronage cases. Just as Duff looked at the lawyer Duff was
berating, Judge Duff said: "If you say anything more I am going
to do something to you." Such as jailing him for contempt.
Funny thing, the lawyer had not said hardly a word.
After the taping of my show, before it was even cablecast, Judge
Duff had heard about my show about him. Judge Duff saw me in the
lobby of the federal courthouse and came up behind me and in a
very sarcastic tone said to me, "Thanks for the compliment,
Skolnick."
After the show was cablecast, because of the large viewership, it
became widely known and understood that Judge Duff is certifiably
insane, and has a psychiatric disability. To once and for all
hush up the whole business about Judge Duff and the rulings about
BNL and Chicago and such, Chief Judge Posner issued a series of
rare and strange rulings, called mandamus cases, brought by
lawyers complaining that Judge Duff is erratic (if not actually
crazy.) Suddenly the mainstream press began condemning Judge
Duff as erratic. Was there a danger that Judge Duff was going to
start blabbing about the big fix involving himself in the BNL
Chicago case? Judge Posner's much publicized rulings against
Duff on the mandamus petitions discredited Duff. Thereafter, who
would believe anything Judge Duff said in or out of court?
Then stories began circulating that the Justice Department,
because of a crazy ruling by Judge Duff, in a secret complaint to
Congress, wanted Judge Duff impeached. The one-million
circulation Chicago Tribune, in a front page story headlined
"Beleagured Judge Steps Down From U.S. Bench -- Duff was known
for erratic actions." The Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court
in Chicago is quoted as saying Duff "has a legitimate physical
disability." What he really meant is that Judge Duff has long
been known, and subject to blackmail, because of his mental
disability.
The Justice Department complaint against Judge Duff was so secret
that the U.S. Attorney in Chicago warned his entire office that
if anyone there talked about it, they would be fired.
The funny thing was that the federal appeals court in Chicago,
populated with banker-judges, removed Duff from a lawsuit
contesting the state's treatment of the mentally ill. Duff had
demanded in court that the Illinois Governor come personally and
privately to meet Judge Duff about the mental hospital case;
otherwise, Judge Duff threatened to torpedo numerous other state
lawsuits pending on his docket, to cost the state many millions.
Lawyers complained that Judge Duff was so nuts, that motions and
briefs filed without inclusion of his middle name were rejected
out of hand. A local group called "The Chicago Council of
Lawyers," in a 1991 evaluation (blackmailing Duff during the BNL
Chicago case?) said, "Some lawyers report that the only way to
avoid Judge Duff's ire is to grovel and constantly flatter him."
See the lengthy front-page story, Chicago Tribune, 10/11/96.
Some contend the BNL Chicago case, covered up by Judge Duff and
then nailed shut by appeals Judge Posner, involves a lot more
than just the treason of Bush being in business with Saddam
Hussein; at the same time Bush sent a half a million U.S. troops
in harm's way to the Persian Gulf. Although the press said the
Gulf War casualties were just a few hundred -- how about the
80,000 ex-GIs suffering from Gulf War diseases? Medical sources
claim several thousand of those ex-soldiers have since died of
the strange illnesses. One source claims 15,000 of those
suffering from Persian Gulf War Syndrome have perished.
Some contend the BNL Chicago record cover-up involves among other
things:
** the money that paid for the political assassination of Olof
Palme, Prime Minister of Sweden, who started to complain about
the Swedish arms merchant Bofors committing high crimes in secret
weapons shipments to Iraq and Iran.
** the American CIA as well as foreign intelligence agencies
washing political assassination funding through BNL Chicago.
** the bribery, by BCCI, to try to spread out more in the U.S.,
of 25 percent of the House of Representatives and 28 U.S.
Senators. (Some have forgotten about my exclusive story in
Spotlight in October, 1991, about the BCCI-Congress bribery
mess.)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
[CN: The following paragraph was conveyed to me by phone by Mr.
Skolnick subsequent to his having written the above article. He
wished it to be included with this story. Thanks to a CN reader
for pointing out to myself and Skolnick the apparent Henry Hyde
connection to Judge Duff.]
Judge Duff apparently helped cover up things in the Resolution
Trust Corporation (RTC) case against Congressman Henry Hyde
(Republican, Illinois). The case is still pending. It is
alleged that Hyde, as a director of Clyde Savings & Loan, through
wrongful conduct, caused the downfall of Clyde S&L. A CIA lawyer
came in and, in chambers, asked that records be impounded.
Subsequently such an order by Judge Duff ordering that principal
records be impounded was issued. Duff also apparently arranged
to delay the trial so as to help Hyde. Hyde is reportedly in
charge of the CIA's "black budget" and has more actual authority
than the Director of Central Intelligence (DCIA).
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Since 1963, Mr. Skolnick has been founder/chairman of the
Citizens' Committee to Clean Up the Courts, a public-interest
group researching and investigating judicial corruption and
political murders. Updates of their work are on a regular phone
call, a recorded phone message, 5 minutes: (773) 731-1100. He
is now the moderator of a public access cable TV program,
"Broadsides," in Chicago, available to some 400,000 households.
Using a good browser, you can find many thousands of citations to
his stories and reports on Internet. Office: 8 a.m. to
midnight, 7 days, (773) 375-5741. 9800 South Oglesby Avenue,
Chicago, Illinois 60617-4870. Call before sending Fax. (The area
code changed from 312 to 773 on 10/12/96.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

112
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-55.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 55
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FOCUS ON CHARLES HAYES
======================
The book from which the following is excerpted, The Octopus:
Secret Government and the Death of Danny Casolaro, by Kenn Thomas
and Jim Keith, will be available in late November from Feral
House, POB 3466, Portland, OR 97208.
One person who might have had a view of how PROMIS works was
Charles Hayes. Newspapers identified Hayes as a salvage dealer
in Pulaski County, Kentucky, near the temporary home of Ari Ben-
Menashe in Lexington, who purchased $45 worth of surplus computer
equipment from the government in July 1990. The equipment
included 13 terminals, nine printers, two cartridge module
drives, 19 backup cartridges and two central memory
units--equipment that had been used by the US Attorney's office
since 1983 to maintain information via PROMIS on the witness
protection program, informants, office employees, and outstanding
grand jury cases. In August, when federal officials discovered
that a weak magnetic screwdriver had failed to purge this
information from the equipment adequately, two FBI agents
dispatched to make inquiries of Hayes were kicked out.(1) Three
days later, Hayes began to cooperate with the US Attorney's
office, denied that he had possession of any information that
might have been on the equipment, and invited an inspection.
Inspectors discovered that the serial numbers of the two
cartridge modules that Hayes claimed were the ones he bought did
not match the numbers of the modules the Justice Department had
sold. (2) Hayes then claimed he had sold the modules, but did
not name the purchasers until after federal officials filed a
lawsuit.(3) Justice Department attorneys later claimed that Hayes
had indeed tried to sell the secret information to an undercover
informant, but criminal charges were never filed. (4) The case
led to a congressional investigation of computer security; the
Justice Department now tosses rather than sells its extra data
storage devices.
(1) Baker, David L., "Computer Records Accidentally Sold,"
Lexington Herald-Leader, September 1, 1990.
(2) Baker, David L., "Buyer Says Agents Didn't Find Computer
With Secrets," Lexington Herald-Leader, September 5, 1990.
(3) "Buyer of US Computer Files To Be Disclosed," Lexington
Herald-Leader, September 6, 1990.
(4) Baker, David L., "US Says Pulaski Man Tried To Sell
Secrets," Lexington Herald-Leader, September 22, 1990.
...and
With the help of Wackenhut and the Cabazons, according to Ari
Ben-Menashe, the US developed its own version of the back-door
and the US and Israel began looking for a neutral company through
which it could sell the program to foreign intelligence services.
The company chosen for the task was Degem, a computer firm with
offices in Israel, Guatemala and the South African Bantustan
homeland. It had been taken over for the purpose by Robert
Maxwell, the publishing mogul who drowned under mysterious
circumstances in 1991. Through Maxwell's Degem, working in
tandem with Brian's Hadron, the software found a home with the
military regime in Guatemala, where it tracked leftist
insurgents. "Even if they traveled under a false name, various
characteristics, such as height, hair color, age, were fed into
roadside terminals and PROMIS searched through its database
looking for a common denominator. It would be able to tell an
army commander that a certain dissident who was in the north
three days before had caught a train, then a bus, stayed at a
friend's house, and was now on the road under a different name.
That's how frightening the system was." According to
Ben-Menashe, PROMIS was used in South Africa to track and squelch
the organizers of a strike among the black coal miners via their
mandatory identity cards (5). Degem also sold PROMIS to the
Soviet Union and the system was utilized by its GRU intelligence
service at least until the coup against Mikhail Gorbachev. (6)
(5) Oddly, a member of a congressional delegation sent on a fact-
finding tour to Johannesburg at the exact moment the world's
second largest platinum mine fired 20,000 black workers to end a
walk-out in January 1986, was Charles Hayes of Chicago. The mine
was located in the homeland of Bophuthatswana, northwest of
Johannesburg ("South African Platinum Mine Fires 20,000 Blacks
Over Strike," Lexington Herald Leader, January 7, 1986.) In
December of that year, the Charles Hayes, who would later buy the
loaded Justice Department computers but identified then as an
attorney, was involved with a gemstone smuggling operation in
Brazil with links to Kentucky. He represented one of the
Brazilian corporations indicted by the US over the smuggling.
(White, Jim, Courier-Journal, September 6, 1990.) (6)
Ben-Menashe, Profits of War, p. 141.
Kenn Thomas publishes Steamshovel Press, a journal that regularly
examines conspiracy theories. Singles issues: $5.50 in USA;
US$6.50 foreign. SUbscriptions: $22.00 in USA; US$26 foreign.
Send to Steamshovel Press, POB 23715, St. Louis, MO 63121. On
the web, Steamshovel can be found at:
http://www.umsl.edu/~skthoma
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN

132
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-56.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 56
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"The customer is our enemy." -- Michael Andreas of ADM
ANDREAS, ADM SLAPPED DOWN IN SCHEME
===================================
By Warren Hough
(The Spotlight, Nov. 4, 1996)
[See the new Spotlight web site at http://www.spotlight.org]
In November 1992 FBI agent Brian Shepard, checking on reports of
industrial sabotage, planted hidden microphones in the executive
offices of the Archer Daniels Midland Company (ADM), a leading
agribusiness conglomerate.
"What we were tracking was a mole," says Shepard.
What they found was a viper's nest of fraudulent schemes,
price-fixing and consumer fraud incriminating many of the world's
largest food supply firms.
On October 15, four years after the investigation began, ADM
pleaded guilty to federal charges of criminal price manipulation
and agreed to pay a whopping $100 million fine.
But ADM's surrender is merely "the first thread in a worldwide
web of multinational corporations that pay lip service to 'free
trade' while they join forces against the consumers in cartels
and price-rigging conspiracies," says Otto Welker, a former New
York State prosecutor.
Following ADM's guilty plea, the Justice Department has now
launched criminal investigations of 21 major agribusiness and
food-supply firms, including such industry leaders as the giant
Cargill Corporation and Hoffman-Laroche, a leading Swiss
biochemical manufacturer.
As this issue of The Spotlight went to press, its investigative
reporters have assembled the following facts about the ongoing
probe:
In the summer of 1992, Dr. Mark Whitacre, a specialist in
nutritional science who headed ADM's biochemistry division, found
himself caught in a gnawing dilemma.
On the one hand, Whitacre had become uneasily involved in a
criminal conspiracy: A secret deal between ADM and its main
competitors to fix the price of his biochemistry division's main
product, lysine, an amino acid extracted from corn and used
worldwide as an essential additive to pork and poultry feed.
On the other, Whitacre was ordered to deal with a team of FBI
agents called in by ADM Chairman Dwayne Andreas to find out
whether saboteurs hired by rival Japanese firms were slipping
contaminants into ADM's production machinery.
Tormented by doubts about his complicity in a criminal
conspiracy, Whitacre began to change the account of events he
gave federal investigators.
"I told [FBI agent] Shepard I had lied about some things... It
was a real relief to talk to someone without lying all the time,"
Whitacre related in a court deposition reviewed by The Spotlight.
Shepard soon persuaded Whitacre to "wear a wire" -- that is, to
carry a concealed audio transmitter into the meetings of ADM's
top executives.
-+- Let Them Eat Cake -+-
The results were stunning. Andreas, one of the most powerful
U.S. corporate chieftains, along with his son and heir-apparent,
Vice Chairman Michael Andreas, are heard telling their top aides
to forget all the "hogwash" about free trade, global
competitiveness and "feeding the world" propagandized by ADM's
paid TV commentators such as celebrated talk show host John
McLaughlin. {1}
"Our philosophy is just the opposite. In reality, it is our
competitors who are our friends and the customer is our enemy,"
Michael Andreas, unaware that he is being recorded, reminds his
colleagues time and again.
In line with this corporate philosophy, ADM soon made a secret
pact with its two main competitors in the lysine business -- the
Japanese agribusiness giants Kiowa Hakko and Ajinomoto -- to
create a criminal cartel, fixing market shares and artificially
high worldwide prices for this vital biochemical commodity.
"In a way, it was stealing from the world's poor -- the uncounted
millions of customers Andreas had designated the 'enemy' -- in
order to enrich the fat multinational corporations that supply
our overpriced food," says consumer advocate Nora de Apponyi, a
well-known nutrition specialist.
---------------------------<< Notes >>---------------------------
{1} "...propagandized by ADM's paid TV commentators." Also, ADM
(at least locally, where I live) helps support the PBS News Hour
with Jim Lehrer. A brief ADM promo always starts the PBS
newscast here. Strange, but I haven't seen a whole lot of
coverage of this ADM scandal on PBS.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

147
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-57.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 57
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CONTRARY TO WHAT THE PENTAGON IS TELLING YOU...
There is a deadly Gulf War biological disease ravaging
our troops, and it is contagious!
APPROXIMATELY 15,000 GULF WAR VETERANS ARE ALREADY DEAD AND
BETWEEN 100,000 AND 200,000 TROOPS ARE SICK, DISABLED, OR DYING!
*Be* *Aware* that this disease is also affecting Gulf War
veterans in the other Coalition forces who served alongside our
military, and their civilian populations as well!
According to Senate Testimony from Ex-Senator Donald Riegle
(Feb., Oct. 1994 -- Senate Reports 103-900, 103-983, 103-984):
** BIOLOGICAL weapons were manufactured, sold, and shipped
to Iraq with the full knowledge of the Bush Administration,
Dept. of Commerce, and Centers for Disease Control.
** These Gulf War diseases are CONTAGIOUS, and 75 percent
of GW veterans report the disease now spread to their
spouses and children.
This disease is a public health hazard spread by blood
transfusion, sex, and perspiration. Every sitting senator in
1994 heard this information. This includes ex-Senate Majority
Leader BOB DOLE, whose wife, ELIZABETH DOLE, oversees over 50
percent of the blood donations in this country via the American
Red Cross. Gulf War veterans have asked for a ban on blood
donations due to the transmission of the disease. This has not
been done.
** OUR TROOPS ARE SICK AND DYING! **
Article III, Sec. 3 of the U.S. Constitution defines TREASON as:
"...Giving [the enemies of the United States] Aid and Comfort."
SILENCE IS CONSENT
Whereas:
-- The entire Senate was made aware of this information and
remained silent.
-- Generals Schwarzkopf and Powell had access to the Nuclear,
Biological, and Chemical (NBC) logs which indicated the use of
chemical and biological weapons, and remained silent.
-- The Pentagon (including Assistant Secretary of Health Affairs,
Dr. Stephen Joseph), the Department of Justice, the Centers for
Disease Control, the U.S. Congress, and President William Clinton
have ALL been aware of the above facts AND HAVE REMAINED SILENT!
Therefore:
The American Gulf War Veterans Association, on behalf of all
veterans from all wars and on behalf of the American people,
demand:
1) A full investigation be instituted INDEPENDENT of any
government agency.
2) A complete disclosure of all parties involved in the design,
development, testing, manufacture, sale, and use of all chemical
and biological agents.
3) The media, including all TV and radio networks and news
agencies begin a massive education campaign to accurately address
the truth about the Gulf War illness, its contagiousness, and its
treatment.
4) Companies and individuals who profited IN ANY WAY from the
manufacture, distribution, sale, or deployment of these weapons
have their assets immediately seized until such time as treatment
costs and compensations are determined and provided to those
affected.
5) ALL GULF WAR VETERANS AND THEIR FAMILIES THAT HAVE FILED
CLAIMS RECEIVE IMMEDIATE TREATMENT AND COMPENSATION.
6) If, DURING THIS TIME OF WAR (we are officially at war with
Saddam Hussein -- see P.L. 102-25), the deliberate and willful
withholding of vital information leads to the injury and death of
America's military and civilian populations, we contend that
those withholding that information have thereby "aided the enemy"
and should be charged with neglect, murder, and TREASON!
In this 50th anniversary of the Nuremberg trials, let us not
forget those who were tried, convicted, and hung because they
"were only following orders!" These issues are real. The facts
and official records speak for themselves. Unless the WHOLE
TRUTH is told and those involved in the silent murder of our
nation's guardians are brought to justice BY THE COURT OF PUBLIC
OPINION, every American will be at risk. It is truly a tragedy
when our Gulf War veterans must prove they have an illness, prove
that the Pentagon is lying, and prove that the Pentagon has
possessed this information since 1991 that would have resulted in
the diagnosis and treatment of this disease.
THERE CAN BE A MILLION LIES BUT ONLY ONE TRUTH!
If you are a Gulf War veteran, send your name, address, unit,
location where you were stationed, and the symptoms you
experience. We will send you a two-hour video, documentation
package, and the song dedicated to Gulf War veterans by Dave
Riddell titled, "Where Are The Voices That Care?" (No charge --
you have already paid the price.)
If you know a Gulf War veteran suffering from the effects of
chemical and biological weapons, or if you just want to help
spread the word about this terrible disease and shameful
government cover-up, please contact the American Gulf War
Veterans Association today.
For God and Country,
(signed) Joyce Riley
R.N. BSN (Capt. USAF -- inactive Reserve Flight Nurse)
American Gulf War Veterans Association
3506 Highway 6 South, #117
Sugarland, TX 77478-4401
Phone: (713) 587-5437
Fax: (713) 438-4581
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

104
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-58.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 58
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CHALMER "CHUCK" HAYES: MYSTERY MAN
==================================
The House Select Committee's final report on its investigation of
the assassination Dr. Martin Luther King describes FBI conduct
toward the slain civil rights leader as "morally reprehensible,
illegal, felonious, and unconstitutional." Subsequently the word
was that a "new" FBI, no longer like its former self, had arrived
and we could all relax. Yet the reports we've been hearing
lately on this federal busybody force belie the claim of
"modernity" -- whatever that's supposed to mean.
Does "new" and "modern" equal "better" when it comes to the FBI?
Not so. The Federal Bureau of Investigation's "new" face is no
different than its "old" face -- except that its agents are now
wearing nylon windbreakers bearing brazen and unashamed "FBI"
lettering on the back. It's still the same bunch that
"investigated" the JFK assassination; they have not changed their
ways. Waco, Ruby Ridge, Malcolm X's daughter, Richard Jewell:
these federal boys and girls, like Bill Clinton, just "do as they
please."
I know that Chalmer "Chuck" Hayes is an "ex"-CIA agent and many
may figure, "Who cares what happens to CIA people?" But the
point is that, like at Waco, all citizens, no matter how
unsavoury they might seem, are entitled to equal protection under
the law. The American Civil Liberties Union understood this
principle when, in the late 1970s, they defended the right of
Nazi swine to march in Skokie, Illinois.
Chuck Hayes, says local Kentucky newspaper the "Commonwealth
Journal," has been charged in a "murder for hire" scheme. This
charge is based on the FBI's claim that one of their agents,
working undercover, phoned Hayes and contracted to "scare, hurt,"
or murder Hayes's son in return for $100. Hayes, at last report,
is being held without bond. His location is not known.
According to an anonymous fax I received today (November 3,
1996), the charge against Hayes is false and is a maneuver by the
Clintons, Janet Reno, and FBI Director Louis Freeh against Hayes
"in an attempt to silence him and stop his investigation for Ken
Starr." What is more, adds the author of the anonymous fax, "the
delay in making the existing indictments from being made public
is only delaying the inevitable until after the election."
A preliminary check with one of my sources, an individual whom I
have code-named "Mr. Mercedes," leads me to believe that the
author of the anonymous fax is no lightweight in his access to
inside information.
The anonymous fax goes on to warn: "Welcome to Watergate II, you
sorry excuses for journalists. Sit back and watch the show
unfold with FEMA declaring a national emergency and voiding the
corrupt election of a criminal..." He adds that, "the Clintons
know their co-presidency is soon to collapse and they, along with
their cronies, are all heading to jail..."
(Personally I am thinking lately, "Hey, come to think of it, I'm
poor. So why should I care if Clinton gets in and taxes a bunch
of rich dudes?" Yet beyond economics it's a basic question of
right and wrong: no good can come from having a crook as
President, even if he is my crook.)
So not to get political (vote, or don't vote, for who you
please), but Charles Hayes, no matter what his past associations,
is a U.S. citizen with rights such as *habeas corpus*. No matter
one's personal opinion of him, the principle comes first: FBI
and the justice system has and does break the law it is
supposedly meant to serve. What is happening to Chuck Hayes is
an outrage, especially considering he is associated with an
unpopular, fringe group.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

167
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-59.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 59
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ALERT: FORWARD TO ROSS PEROT
============================
I received the following communique from a person known to me to
not be a lightweight in his knowledge of "deep politics"
(Professor Peter Dale Scott's term for esoteric American
politics; see his excellent book, *Deep Politics and the Death of
JFK, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.) The
person who authored the following communique is a questionable
quantity as far as I'm concerned: yes, he has inside knowledge,
but if or not he operates with a hidden agenda is unknown to me.
My usual policy with information that may be important is to pass
it along and let the reader make up her own mind.
Also I offer the caveat that the following communique betrays an
anti-Israel bias. My own opinion is that Israel is not the "big
bad wolf" that some imagine it to be. This is hinted at, for
example, by evidence showing Great Britain as puppet-master of
Israel. Also, if Israel buys the U.S. Congress, whose fault is
that? Israel's, or the Congress which is widely known worldwide
as being for sale to the highest bidder?
Finally, the author of the following communique makes mention of
Media Bypass magazine and, specifically, that magazine's
investigative reporter Lawrence Myers. Regarding Media Bypass
magazine, they have published some good material in the past, yet
lately seem to be wimping out with legal mumbo jumbo which goes
nowhere. (For a good, fiction-based-on-fact account of what a
dead-end labyrinthe legalisms can be, see *Bleak House* by
Charles Dickens.) As to Mr. Myers, for all I know he may be a
fine, honest reporter, maligned unjustly in some quarters.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
96/Oct/30 (Wed)
Re: Chuck Hayes Alert
Dear Soul,
Please note that 1st hand report from 96/Oct/29 (Tue), concerning
the alleged bond hearing on 96/Oct/28 (Mon) is as follows:
1. NO BOND *EVER* to be allowed
2. NO VISITORS
3. NO MAIL
4. NO PHONE
5. Only alleged attorney visits (2 attorneys named: 1. Kirk
Davis, Burnside, Ky; 2. Warren Scolville, London, Ky; 3.
PROBLEM, one of the two attorney's offices, Congressman Hal
Rogers was observed as an office insider -- who is opposed to
Chuck [Hayes].)
6. Chuck [Hayes] was swooped on by an FBI SWAT team on 96/Oct/22
7. Normal procedure is bond hearing next day -- Wed. 96/Oct/23
-- NOT HELD.
8. Thur 96/Oct/24 NO HEARING held but hearing promised for
Friday 96/Oct/25.
9. 96/Oct/25 -- *NO HEARING*
10. 96/Oct/28 (Mon) Set for
(a.) ARRAIGNMENT for 96/Nov/22
(b.) TRIAL Pre-set for 96/Dec/2
11. Very, very unusual outcome based rulings on an
(a.) alleged felony, with
(b.) no one actually hurt,
(c.) no prior criminal record known or mentioned.
It is probably not wisdom to leave this thing bottled up in
peanut London, Ky. Please get this out on Internet or however or
wherever.
Also, we do not endorse the FBI/DOJ spin doctor Louisville, Ky
Courier Journal 96/Oct/24 story as verification when they have
(1) No Case #, (2) no Judges name, (3) no charge cited, or (4)
for DOJ/FBI false evidence creation abilities.
Please, if you can *get* *this* *to* *Ross* *Perot* (R.P.),
please do so. If you have no good way to get R.P., -- Please
put, "Alert, forward to R. Perot," on your Internet or anywhere
and *get* *it* *to* *R.P.*
Note:
Before Lawrence "Mossad Morrano" Meyers took charge at *Media by
Pass*, that magazine focused cover photos and stories on enemy
perpetrators -- detailing their evil deeds -- such as Diane
"Mossad" Feinstein.
Since Mossad Meyers is in control they focus on souls trying to
do good -- 4 of whom have been jailed or terrorized by the
FBI/BATF/DOJ -- so far. The *first* was the leader of fed
watchers: photoed on cover of Media by Pass by Meyers, almost
immediately jailed thereafter. The *second* was a witness hidden
from the OKC bombing perpetrators (BATF/FBI/DOJ) but exposed by
Meyers, who turned the heretofore unknown witness over to the
FBI/BATF/DOJ terrorizers. The *third* was when the new editor
and Meyers published against Mary Snell, the wife of Richard
Snell, and for his murderers, convicted felon Arkansas Governor
Guy Tucker in league with the former Governor. The *fourth* is
now *Chuck Hayes*, photo cover targeted in September 96 by
Meyers, imprisoned in October 96 by FBI/BATF/DOJ.
*WHO WILL BE THE NEXT VICTIM* of what should be correctly renamed
*MEDIA BY MOSSAD*.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
1996/Nov/1
Brian,
Please recall we have written to you in the past, having/working
with Chuck Hayes, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, others known to you -- Jim
Norman, so forth.
We have been de-stabilized by our imposter non-government for
trying to help covert community souls who wind up in a jam.
Which description now fits Chuck Hayes.
We are asking you to use your computer resource access to get us
"*best*" phone and fax [for] 2 to 3 persons:
1) Woolsey -- former CIA Director
2) R. Perot
3) Air Force General Cairn or Cairns (acting CIA Director four
short weeks, before Deutch.)
Each of these three has personal knowledge of Chuck [Hayes] and
may help if pushed/goaded.
Please respond in some way so we know you received this
communication.
Thank you,
Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

134
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-60.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 60
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
READING THE TEA LEAVES
======================
Expert Post-Election Analysis by Dan Branermi
---------------------------------------------
Straw man Bob Dole pretended to run for President. He went easy
on Bill Clinton in return for a cushy post-election job, perhaps
as part of a bi-partisan commission of some type.
The larger picture is for a second-term slow grilling of Bill
Clinton with him eventually stepping down. In the works may well
be, as emphasized by Sherman H. Skolnick of Chicago, an
appointment by post-Clinton President Al Gore of Jay Rockefeller
as Vice President. From there, Gore could be given the heave-ho
based on alleged scandals connected to him.
All this "coincidentally" would occur concurrently with an
inevitable economic collapse. Public rage at economic disaster
could be diverted onto hapless Bill Clinton, suddenly revealed as
a crook to a somewhat ignorant public.
Countering all this could be Clinton stonewalling: as head of
the Executive branch, Bill Clinton has a lot of power. Were such
stonewalling to occur, a prolonged agony of Clinton scandal
hearings, investigations, and "news," may bring the situation to
a tragic climax: veteran White House correspondent Sarah
McClendon reportedly has voiced fears that Clinton may be
assassinated.
Clinton is Oswald. As pointed out by Michel Foucault in his
book, *Surveiller et punir*, the condemned man represents the
symmetrical, inverted figure of the king. Lee Harvey Oswald's
father died two months before he was born. Oswald's uncle,
Charles "Dutz" Murret, was Lee's surrogate father during his
youth. "Uncle Dutz" became connected with Carlos Marcello's
Louisiana Mafia in 1947, and later helped young Lee Harvey Oswald
gain employment as a "runner" for Marcello. Both Lee and Uncle
Dutz worked in Marcello's downtown bookmaking network. (See
*Mafia Kingfish* by John H. Davis, e.g. ch. 52.)
Bill Clinton's father William Blythe died in a car wreck in May
of 1946. About three months later his son, the future President
Bill Clinton, was born. Bill Clinton had as mentor and surrogate
father one Raymond G. Clinton, brother of stepfather Roger
Clinton, Sr. "Uncle Raymond" tutored young Bill Clinton in the
hidden ways of politics. As pointed out by Roger Morris in
*Partner's in Power*, "it would be to big Uncle Raymond that
Billy turned again and again in matters of real power and
ambition." According to veteran sleuth Skolnick, Uncle Raymond
had underworld connections (see CN 9.54).
Oswald was the condemned man -- the inverted figure of the king.
About 30 years after the death of condemned man Oswald we have
come full-circle: Clinton is the inverted figure of the
condemned man. Who is praised when the harvest (economy) is
good? The king. Who is blamed when the crops (economy) fail?
The king. The planned eruption of the various Clinton scandals
into general public consciousness will coincide with the "crops"
failing, and Bill Clinton has long-since been "sheep dipped" for
his role of diversionary fall guy.
Tom Valentine, host of *Radio Free America*, has a slightly
different slant. As reported in The Spotlight of 11/11/96, "some
insiders are saying the charges and arrest [of Chuck Hayes] are
politically motivated because Hayes is allegedly working with
Special Prosecutor Kenneth Starr." Valentine reportedly has
predicted that upcoming scandal hearings may wind up further
destroying public confidence in the government. He agrees with
this observer that the whole situation is deliberate, yet differs
as to its purpose: "When the truth hits the 'sheeple' like a ton
of bricks, the mainstream will be traumatized. What kind of
gimmick will be offered by the manipulators -- a new world
order?"
Adding to the boiling cauldron is unrest within the military.
According to Mr. Skolnick, there have in the past few years been
several military plots to arrest Bill Clinton. Says Skolnick,
"Some contend it would be justified under the Military Code."
Currently, according to the Chicago journalist and crusader
against corruption, "Clinton has quietly ordered total
surveillance on all the flag officers, more than 400 Generals and
Admirals. He wants to know who is plotting to arrest him."
In his current recorded message (312-731-1100), Mr. Skolnick
foresees imminent indictments, including of First Lady Hillary
Clinton. Says Skolnick, "Some expect Hillary may take up
residence in a foreign country having no extradition treaty with
the U.S., such as Ireland." If this occurs, perhaps her new
neighbor will be disgraced Mexican ex-president Carlos Salinas,
now also hiding out in Ireland.
Post-election analysis: Eruption of Clinton scandals will
coincide with economic collapse. Clinton will be the scapegoat
for public anger. Like Oswald, he will divert wrath from the
real killers, in this case the killers of the economy.
Complicating things will be Bill Clinton's ability, as Chief of
the Executive branch, to stall the process. Lurking on the
sidelines is a disgruntled military, with power of their own.
(By an interesting coincidence, the letters in the name "Dan
Branermi" can be re-arranged to spell "Brian Redman.")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

174
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-61.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 61
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MORE CRISIS FOR CLINTON
=======================
By Sherman H. Skolnick
----------------------
Some military flag officers and Vice President Al Gore are
closely watching Bill Clinton. Is a crisis coming? Part of it
revolves around the crash, off Long Island, New York, of TWA
Flight 800 which had been enroute to Paris. Some background:
More than 60 French nationals died in the crash. Two top
officials of the French Secret Police were scheduled to be
onboard Flight 800 but, at the last moment, took another flight.
Five or more of their assistants, however, died in the crash. By
the way, what were the French CIA brass doing so much in the
United States? Were they trying to determine if there is a U.S.
military coup in the works against Clinton?
The Clinton White House blocked the French government's efforts
to send 300 of their own divers and experts to scour the ocean
bottom for what really happened. It was only then that Clinton
ordered a supposed full-scale U.S. ocean search for victims and
pieces of the crashed plane.
Since at least the early 1960s and DeGaulle, France has not
trusted the United States. At the time, they withdrew from NATO
and turned their missiles to face the U.S. Undercover operatives
of the French CIA infiltrated the plot to assassinate President
Kennedy in 1963. Their explosive details of a high-level
American CIA and military cabal were in a European best-seller in
14 languages and published in English in Belgium in 1968, and
written under a pen-name. Then and now the Washington government
forbids U.S. bookstores to sell the book, called "Farewell
America."
Only two Americans were able to smuggle the books into the U.S. I
was one of them and gave away copies at college lectures in the
1970s in return for small donations. No copies are left now.
Like with the book "Farewell America," the Paris government again
has the smoking gun that this time could topple the Clinton White
House. The pilot of a French civilian airplane here says he
swerved his plane to avoid a missile. French airlines are
equipped with a special onboard video taping system. French TV
has the video tape and so far has embargoed it. (French TV also
beams to Chicago via satellite. Their up-link and down-link are
on top of a public access cable TV facility in Chicago.) The
French CIA also has the video tape which, if aired, could wreck
the Clinton White House efforts to stonewall Flight 800 details.
A former ABC News correspondent stationed in Paris, Pierre
Salinger, says he has inside data from French intelligence as
well as the U.S. Secret Service showing that Flight 800 was shot
down by a U.S. Navy missile. (Was the shoot-down by accident or
otherwise? Some contend the plane had onboard hundreds of
billions of dollars of counterfeit bonds, so well made they could
be used to topple either the U.S. or a foreign government.
Which? Apparently, every other effort to stop the circulation
and transport of the bonds has met with failure. Was the
situation also like Pan Am Flight 103? Which had onboard, when
it was bombed and crashed, somewhere between 8 and 50 CIA
personnel returning from a failed hostage rescue mission; some of
them subpoenaed to testify before a Congressional committee of
treasonous meddling by George Bush. The Flight 103 was brought
down 6 weeks after Bush was elected President in 1988.)
By the way, some contend an American publisher suppressed a book
by Salinger about the treason of Bush in a Paris suburb and
elsewhere in Europe, in October, 1980, arranging to delay release
of U.S. hostages held by Iran. Bush's treachery was to make
Jimmy Carter appear to be a wimp and to benefit the Reagan/Bush
election ticket. It is called the "October Surprise" scenario.
The hostages were released in January, 1981, a few moments after
Reagan was inaugurated the new President. (And who all was it
that shot at Reagan some weeks thereafter?)
Clinton could have avoided the apparent crisis about Flight 800
by quickly, after the crash, apologizing to the families of those
who perished, stating [that] by accident a U.S. missile downed
the plane. But: how would he apologize to the families of the
French nationals who perished? And to the families of the French
Secret Police?
Note: The TWA Flight 800 crash was in July, 1996. In July,
1988, in a similar mishap, like with Flight 800 (assuming Flight
800 was just an "accident"), an aegis-class missile cruiser
downed an Iranian civilian airplane killing, like with Flight
800, several hundred people. (Some use the analogy to posit an
Iranian terrorist missile scenario against Flight 800.) On the
Iranian crash, see: the book "The Line of Fire" by Admiral
William J. Crowe, Jr., former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs.
In published accounts, Pierre Salinger is quoted as saying that
he had the document on Flight 800 five weeks before he disclosed
it a few days after Clinton's 1996 re-election. Salinger says
some "very important people" had advised him not to reveal it
until after the November 5th election because "officials won't
tell the truth until after the American election." (Chicago
Tribune, 11/9/96). {1}.
The French are apparently aware of a U.S. military coup against
Clinton -- several attempts since 1995 have been violently
snuffed out -- such as the planeload of generals and such, killed
in a sabotaged plane crash in Alabama on April 17, 1995, two days
before the Oklahoma bombings (which some contend was an ATF
"sting" that went wrong.)
In this crisis, Al Gore reportedly is joining with the flag
officers -- Admirals and Generals -- to remove Clinton: (1) as
provided under the military code, with flag officers and others
arresting and charging Commander-in-Chief Clinton with treason
and sedition (which would be their defense if Clinton charges
them with mutiny.) And (2) under the 25th Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution, Gore as Vice President, joining with other
Executive Department officials, to unseat Clinton, making Gore
the Acting President. Gore reportedly plans to name John D.
Rockefeller IV, called Jay, the appointed, not elected, new Vice
President. Does Gore have enough life insurance? Jay itches to
be the unelected President.
---------------------------<< Notes >>---------------------------
{1} Or did Salinger wait until after the election because
releasing the info before the election might be perceived as just
"dirty politics," in other words, just political propaganda?
Releasing the info after the election removes the stigma of
pre-election propaganda.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Mr. Skolnick, chairman/founder since 1963 of Citizens' Committee
to Clean Up the Courts, investigating and disclosing judicial
bribery and political murders. Updates of their work are on a
recorded 5-minute phone message, on 24 hrs/day, a regular phone
call: (312) 731-1100. He is the moderator of a public access
cable TV show, on since 1991. His comments are on various
categories on Internet. (Put in his full name through search
engines such as Netscape.) Office: 8 a.m. to midnight, 7 days,
(312) 375-5741. Call before sending fax. 9800 S. Oglesby Ave.,
Chicago, IL 60617-4870. The new area code after Oct. 1996 has
been 773. If any problem, continue for awhile using old area
code 312.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

120
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-62.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 62
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SALINGER VS. FBI: AN UNFINISHED PUZZLE
======================================
Sherman Skolnick tells me that he demonstrated quite an aptitude
for mathematics in his younger days. But, since he attended
school in a time when sensitivity to challenges (e.g. opening
doors, climbing stairs, etc.) faced by the "differently abled"
(Skolnick contracted polio at the age of 6) was low, his gift was
not nurtured as it should have been. He was eventually forced to
discontinue his formal schooling.
I suspect that many so-called "conspiracy theorists" have some
facility for, or derive some pleasure from, solving puzzles. If
there is such a thing as mathematical aptitude, I'd bet
conspiratologists would show statistically significant numbers in
that category. That is what most or all areas of conspiracy
research have in common: an unsolved puzzle. For example, the
facts show that Lee Harvey Oswald did not shoot President
Kennedy. Yet the FBI and other alleged experts have continued to
sit on their hands, refusing to "solve the puzzle" and insisting
that Oswald was the culprit and there was no conspiracy. So, to
those of mathematical and/or puzzle solving inclinations, the
natural thing is to begin turning the thing over in your mind.
That may be why some don't quite understand conspiracy theorists:
people have different aptitudes: some are more language
oriented, others show talent in the mathematical realm. Those
skilled in language perhaps cannot fathom what fun there could be
in solving a puzzle.
The latest puzzle begins with Pierre Salinger claiming that TWA
Flight 800 was brought down by a U.S. Navy missile. Then, of
course, the FBI and other officials deny it happened. One would
naturally expect that next, Pierre Salinger would be interviewed
on, say, CNN's Larry King show. Instead, the guest is, of all
people, basketball player Magic Johnson. (Huh?)
So the puzzle is left hanging there, unsolved. The unreconciled
dispute has disappeared into Limbo, displaced now by the
convenient eruption of an Army sex scandal. And so, the
conspiratologists begin sifting through the evidence, even while
FBI's Kallstrom pounds on the lectern in a temper fit deleted
from later broadcasts.
My thanks to a CN reader for putting me in touch with reports
from Paris Match magazine and for assisting me with the following
translation of their reportage. The following translation is
admittedly awkward. I will forward the original articles, in
French, to those who request it.
"You are invited to attend a function on Long Island," read
the invitation. The function was to be held at Docker's
restaurant. It was that evening that Linda Kabot began
taking the photos. And she was taking photos minutes later
when an explosion occurred over the ocean. It was soon
learned that TWA 800 had exploded in flight.
Linda Kabot has just brought back from the developer the
pictures she took in the evening of July 17. She is about
to put them aside but her husband, who watches over her
shoulder, intrigued by a detail, wants to study the
picture. He notices a long, unusual object that crosses
the sky. Immediately making the connection with the Boeing
catastrophe, the couple calls the FBI. An hour later,
police arrive and show great interest in the photo. They
leave with the first positive and the negative. Sometime
later, helicopters will hover over the restaurant, probably
to obtain ballistics data. Anxious to learn the experts'
findings, the Kabots are told, "No conclusion can be
obtained from this photo." As they insist on knowing the
reason for the intriguing detail, one expert tells them,
"It could be a cigar thrown by a guest." They are not
convinced.
The cylinder that crosses the sky appears, in its
extremity, incandescent, which may indicate the combustion
from the propulsion system of a rocket.
The hypothesis of a missile having destroyed TWA Flight 800
was transmitted to Paris Match magazine by e-mail about a
month ago. With great support from technical
demonstrations, our mysterious correspondent, supposedly a
captain of a Boeing 747, explained the tragedy to us with
an astonishing verisimilitude. We did not immediately go
with the story, because a journalist's role requires that
we verify the sources. The transmission of an e-mail, as
it was in this case, gave us no guaranty of reliability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

163
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-63.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 63
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DID SUB-LAUNCHED MISSILE DOWN CIVILIAN JETLINER OFF LONG ISLAND?
================================================================
By Mike Blair
-------------
(The Spotlight, Nov. 18, 1996)
Investigative reporters have focused on the possibility that TWA
Flight 800 was shot down by a missile-bearing submarine on July
17. A CBS News reporter contacted The Spotlight to exchange
information regarding the downing of the airliner, which cost the
lives of all 230 people on board.
The CBS reporter said she was particularly interested in The
Spotlight's reports that U.S. spy satellites had photographed the
downing of the aircraft (Spotlight, Aug. 12 and subsequently).
This is one of the few times that the mainstream media has joined
The Spotlight in a probe of a news story in the populist
newspaper's 21-year history.
The Spotlight reported that a U.S. infrared spy satellite was in
orbit over Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island and had
actually photographed the airliner being downed by a missile.
Similar reports have appeared in New York newspapers.
Most mainstream reports are moving to the conclusion that neither
a missile nor a bomb downed the jet, rather that it was some sort
of accidental internal explosion bringing the plane down.
-+- Photos Studied -+-
According to Spotlight sources, the National Reconnaisance Office
(NRO) was studying "frame-by-frame" photographs taken of the
downing of Flight 800 to determine the type and origin of the
missile responsible for the tragedy.
The NRO is the nation's most secret spy agency, which operates
and collects the data obtained from the highly-sophisticated spy
platforms in space orbit.
According to internal CBS memoranda provided to The Spotlight,
the network news department has determined that Assistant FBI
Director James K. Kallstrom, who is heading the bureau's probe of
the crash out of New York, is "convinced it's a missile [that
destroyed the airliner] and that he thinks the Pentagon is
withholding information."
The Spotlight has researched details regarding an American
guided-missile cruiser that was operating in the vicinity of the
plane crash, some 10 miles off Long Island's southern coast.
It has been determined that the *Ticonderoga*-class guided
missile cruiser, USS Normandy (CG-60), a 567-foot, 9,466-ton
vessel commissioned by the Navy in 1990, was about 180 miles from
the TWA jetliner when it was blown from the sky.
The Navy claims that the Normandy's air search radar was not
working at the time the TWA plane was downed. According to the
*Jane's Fighting Ships*, published in Britain, guided-missile
cruisers of the Normandy's class are equipped with at least three
air-search radar systems, each apparently capable of providing
the others back-up.
The original area of ocean off Long Island determined to be part
of the "crime scene" of the crash by the FBI and other federal
agencies measured an area of 2,400 square miles. That would
place the missile cruiser well within the area.
CBS says that a Navy Lockheed P-3 Orion was airborne at 10,000
feet, about 60 miles from the TWA airliner, when the missile
struck the jumbo jet.
The P-3 Orion is one of the nation's key sub-hunting aircraft.
According to a CBS memorandum, Paul Ragganes, a CBS expert in the
field of military weaponry, "says that the fact that the Normandy
(a cruise missile carrier) was nearby, and that the P-3 Orion was
even closer makes him think that the Navy was at least responding
to a threat. If that's the case, the threat turned into a really
ugly and embarrassing reality."
It has been reported in the media that a Navy H-60 helicopter was
in the area where the TWA plane went down.
According to *Jane's*, the Normandy carries two SH-60B Seahawk
helicopters, the Navy's version of the Army's UH-60 Blackhawk.
The Seahawk is equipped with a LAMPS III (Light Airborne
Multi-Purpose System III). The purpose of the LAMPS electronics
is anti-submarine warfare.
The Seahawk is also capable of releasing submarine-detecting
sonobuoys into the sea where submarine activity is suspected.
The Orion is also capable of releasing sonobuoys.
The CBS reporter has queried the TWA Task Force, which consists
of the federal agencies involved in the TWA probe, about the
presence of the P-3 Orion sub-hunter being in the area of the
crash and notes "this kind of aircraft is usually around when
they're looking for a submarine, or they know one is in the
water."
Since the downing of TWA Flight 800, the FBI and other federal
investigative agencies have received more than 100 reports from
individuals who witnessed a missile streak up toward the
aircraft, just before it burst into flames.
At first, it was speculated that the airplane was downed by
terrorists using a small shoulder-fired surface-to-air missile
(SAM), such as an American-made Stinger.
However, some military experts, including explosive weapons
specialist retired Air Force Gen. Ben Partin, believe that a
larger, far more powerful missile was used.
The retired general said he believes that a far more
sophisticated and larger radar-guided SAM was used, one that is
fired from a fixed launcher, either from a ship, the ground or
some type of mobile launching system.
It was, some experts contend, the type of missile that would
instantly destroy its target, just as Flight 800 was destroyed,
and not a shoulder-fired weapon that could just cripple its
target but still leave it airborne.
"The type of missile that hit Flight 800," the retired general
said, "was of a type intended to destroy a large strategic
bomber, not just damage it and leave it to limp along to its
target to deliver nuclear weapons."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

226
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-64.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 64
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MEESTER VEELSON
===============
The one-dimensional Woodrow Wilson shown on the PBS series, "The
Great War," is typical of supposed highbrow entertainments
offered by "public" television: academicist subject matter but
without depth or disagreement, sprinkled (naturally) with blab
from various hired hands of the federal "truth" factories.
(Lest any say, "Ah hah. A white male with too much time on his
hands. Why isn't he watching endless sports? Hey you! Get a
life," note that I only watched the Woodrow Wilson part, not the
entire 8-hour series.)
Funding for "The Great War" came from the National Endowment for
the Humanities, i.e. from the federal government. So, of course,
Woodrow Wilson appeared without blemishes and like all other
noble beings who somehow invariably gravitate to Washington, D.C.
This marvelous circumstance is echoed by another "coincidence":
somehow the "truth" and federal funds for "scholars" always occur
together; rarely does a "scholar" not find lucky federal dollars
along the road as he journeys toward the "truth."
(The modern Rome on the Potomac does another interesting trick:
it takes the money from a continental nation, its various
functionaries rake off and/or steal their percentage, much of the
loot gets distributed as largesse to corporate swine, and finally
it does its big magic trick -- makes it appear as if a beneficent
Washington, D.C. is generously giving money to its citizens.
Many are fooled by this sleight-of-hand prestidigitated by Rome
on the Potomac.)
As my personal protest against the cartoonization of history,
here is information on Woodrow Wilson of a counter-sainthood
nature.
John Dos Passos, in his book *Nineteen Nineteen* (usually
included with two other of his books in a volume called *U.S.A.*,
a.k.a. "The U.S.A. Trilogy"), gives his own sketch of Woodrow
Wilson in a section he calls, "Meester Veelson." Here are
excerpts:
When he got his Ph.D. from Johns Hopkins he moved to a
professorship at Wesleyan, wrote articles, started a
History of the United States.
...in 1901 the trustees of Princeton offered him the
presidency...
...and in 1910 the democratic bosses of New Jersey,
hardpressed by muckrakers and reformers, got the bright
idea of offering the nomination for governor to the
stainless college president...
...so he left Princeton only half reformed to be Governor
of New Jersey...
He was introduced to Colonel House, that amateur Merlin of
politics who was spinning his webs at the Hotel Gotham.
And at the convention in Baltimore the next July the upshot
of the puppetshow staged for sweating delegates by Hearst
and House behind the scenes... was that Woodrow Wilson was
nominated for the presidency.
...he left the State of New Jersey half reformed... and
went to the White House our twenty-eighth president.
While Woodrow Wilson drove up Pennsylvania Avenue beside
Taft the great buttertub, who as president had been
genially undoing T.R.'s [Teddy Roosevelt's] reactionary
efforts to put business under the control of the
government, J. Pierpont Morgan sat playing solitaire in his
back office on Wall Street, smoking twenty black cigars a
day, cursing the follies of democracy.
First it was "neutrality in thought and deed," then "too
proud to fight" when the Lusitania sinking and the danger
to the Morgan loans and the stories of the British and
French propagandists set all the financial centers in the
East bawling for war, but the suction of the drumbeat and
the guns was too strong; the best people took their
fashions from Paris and their broad "a's" from London, and
T.R. and the House of Morgan.
Wilson became the state (war is the health of the state),
Washington his Versailles, manned the socialized government
with dollar a year men out of the great corporations and
ran the big parade.
If you objected to making the world safe for cost plus
democracy you went to jail with [Eugene] Debs.
With the help of Almighty God, Right, Truth, Justice,
Freedom, Democracy, the Selfdetermination of Nations, No
indemnities no annexations,
and Cuban sugar and Caucasian manganese and Northwestern
wheat and Dixie cotton, the British blockade, General
Pershing, the taxicabs of Paris and the seventyfive gun
we won the war.
On December 4th, 1918, Woodrow Wilson, the first president
to leave the territory of the United States during his
presidency, sailed for France.
On June 28th the Treaty of Versailles was ready and Wilson
had to go back home to explain to the politicians who'd
been ganging up on him meanwhile in the Senate and House
and to sober public opinion and to his father's God how
he'd let himself be trimmed...
From the day he landed in Hoboken he had his back to the
wall of the White House, trying to save his faith in words,
talking to save his faith in the League of Nations, talking
to save his faith in himself, in his father's God.
He strained every nerve of his body and brain, every agency
of the government he had under his control; (if anybody
disagreed he was a crook or a red; no pardon for Debs).
In Seattle the wobblies whose leaders were in jail, in
Seattle the wobblies whose leaders had been lynched, who'd
been shot down like dogs, in Seattle the wobblies lined
four blocks as Wilson passed, stood silent with their arms
folded staring at the great liberal as he was hurried past
in his car, huddled in his overcoat, haggard with fatigue,
one side of his face twitching. The men in overalls, the
workingstiffs let him pass in silence after all the other
blocks of handclapping and patriotic cheers.
...on the train to Wichita he had a stroke. He gave up the
speaking tour that was to sweep the country for the League
of Nations. After that he was a ruined paralysed man
barely able to speak.
The book, *Lies My Teacher Told Me* by James W. Loewen has a few
tidbits on "Meester Veelson," such as.....
** The Wilson administration hired two Japanese-Mexicans to
try to poison Pancho Villa.
** "Textbooks might begin discussing the influence of
multinational corporations on U.S. foreign policy with the
administration of Woodrow Wilson. Pressure from First
National Bank of New York helped prompt Wilson's
intervention in Haiti. U.S. interests owned more of Mexico
than interests from anywhere else, including Mexico itself,
which helps explain Wilson's repeated invasions of that
country. In Russia, the new communist government
nationalized all petroleum assets; as a consequence,
Standard Oil of New Jersey was 'the major impetus' behind
American opposition to the Bolsheviks."
** "J. Edgar Hoover and the agency that became the FBI got
their start investigating alleged communists during the
Woodrow Wilson administration. Although the last four
years of that administration saw more antiblack race riots
than any other time in our history, Wilson had agents focus
on gathering intelligence on African Americans, not on
white Americans who were violating blacks' civil rights."
** Says Woodrow Wilson: "We want one class of persons to
have a liberal education, and we want another class of
persons, a very much larger class of necessity in every
society, to forgo the privilege of a liberal education and
fit themselves to perform specific difficult manual tasks."
** Under Wilson, the United States intervened in Latin
America more often than at any other time in our history.
** "The filmmaker David W. Griffith quoted Wilson's
two-volume history of the United States, now notorious for
its racist view of Reconstruction, in his infamous
masterpiece "The Clansman," a paean to the Ku Klux Klan for
its role in putting down "black-dominated" Republican state
governments during Reconstruction. Griffith based the
movie on a book by Wilson's former classmate, Thomas Dixon,
whose obsession with race was "unrivaled until *Mein
Kampf*." At a private White House showing, Wilson saw the
movie, now retitled "Birth of a Nation," and returned
Griffith's compliment: 'It is like writing history with
lightning, and my only regret is that it is all so true.'"
** "Wilson displayed little regard for the rights of anyone
whose opinions differed from his own. But textbooks take
pains to insulate him from wrongdoing. 'Congress,' not
Wilson, is credited with having passed the Espionage Act of
June 1917 and the Sedition Act of the following year,
probably the most serious attacks on the civil liberties of
Americans since the short-lived Alien and Sedition Acts of
1798."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

177
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-65.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 65
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
P O T P O U R R I
=================
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
The TWA 800 "Fumes" Theory
--------------------------
The situation is, if it was a mechanical failure that brought
down TWA Flight 800, then TWA gets the heat with lawsuits. If a
missile brought down TWA 800, then either (a) the U.S. Navy takes
the fall for the crash or, (b) the foreign terrorists with a
missile scenario means that U.S. foreign policy gets blamed. The
foreign terrorists with a missile scenario also opens up public
indignation and calls for retaliation. What is needed is some
scenario where no one gets blamed, not TWA, not the U.S. Navy,
not U.S. foreign policy. Voila. It was "fumes" that caused the
crash.
It is noteworthy that the "fumes" solution comes about a week
after the crash investigators had the pressure turned up on them
by the Pierre Salinger allegations. 'Til then, the FBI and NTSB
had been sort of coasting along. (Not to say that individuals
connected with FBI and NTSB weren't individually, within their
personal microscopic areas of duty, honestly working on the case;
just that the lumbering bureaucracy itself had settled in for a
long winter's nap.) Another angle on this is that pressure was
already building on high-level government officials (higher-level
than, for example, FBI's Kallstrom) to deliver up a scapegoat for
the crash. Could U.S. foreign policy, which I suspect as the
true culprit in the crash, have maneuvered behind the scenes to
get the U.S. Navy to take the blame? This would explain perhaps
Kallstrom's lectern pounding pique: Kallstrom, unaware of higher
level manuevers meant to foist blame on the U.S. Navy, would have
incidentally ended up looking bad himself -- if a U.S. Navy
mistake wound up taking the blame, then why hadn't Kallstrom
figured it out? Why was it only thanks to "honest Salinger" that
the case was solved? So Kallstrom, in this scenario aware that a
U.S. Navy-did-it solution is not possible, becomes enraged at
what he sees developing.
Now, thanks to the "fumes" theory, everyone is off the hook.
TWA can presumably emerge with its good reputation intact and not
likely to pay huge lawsuit claims. U.S. foreign policy's
reputation and possible escalation of tensions with whoever shot
down TWA 800 is avoided. "Fumes," like an act of God, is the
perfect fall guy.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Was FBI Drunk at Waco?
----------------------
Not yet speculated upon to my knowledge is the question of
how much beer drinking was going on during the FBI siege of the
Branch Davidian compound near Waco, Texas. Thanks to independent
investigators we know that many in BATF are heavy boozers. Is it
to far fetched to wonder if, during those long nights around the
campfire by their RV campers, FBI personnel may have enjoyed a
few cold brews? Or maybe something a little stronger, to help
warm them up? Did the press, also involved in this little
camping adventure, join with the FBI agents in a little
around-the-campfire good cheer? Did the FBI enjoy a few boozy
laughs as the tanks circled the Davidian compound, blaring the
sounds of slaughtered rabbits and Nancy Sinatra late at night, to
the ears of terrified children within?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bizarre Episcopal Sex Rituals
-----------------------------
The Washington Times National Weekly Edition (Nov. 17, 1996)
reports on an article in the current Penthouse magazine
(presumably available at Penthouse's web site) about a "secret
cadre of gay and bisexual cross-dressing Episcopal priests." It
is alleged, among other things, that a Rev. Howard Williams, who
coordinates children's ministries for the Episcopal Church,
tricked Wasticlinio Barros, 23, of Brazil into taking employment
at what he thought was a job as a translator in New York.
According to Penthouse, as summarized by the Washington Times,
"Mr. Barros realized upon arriving in Brooklyn that his true job
was to serve as a 'sex slave' for [Rev. William] Andries, as well
as to provide sexual services for at least seven other priests.
When he tried to flee the country, he said, Mr. Andries
confiscated his passport and returned it on condition that Mr.
Barros help recruit additional young men from Brazil."
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Cars, Houses, Cost More
-----------------------
According to an article in the Nov. 11, 1996 New Federalist
newspaper, the purchasing power of the average American has
collapsed by 50 percent in the past 30 years. This ties in with
the phenomena, previously noted by Conspiracy Nation, of the
"liberation" of women -- "liberated" so they now must, from dire
necessity, trudge off to work each morning with their husbands.
This is not to say that equal treatment for women is not a good
thing, but rather that their now being forced to work so their
families can maintain a decent standard of living has been sold
as a "great leap forward" in these "modern times."
New Federalist offers statistics to back up their claim of
declining purchasing power in our "good" economy:
** "In 1967, it required 35 weeks of an average worker's
weekly paycheck to purchase a new car (including financing
costs); today, it requires 58 paychecks. That is, today's worker
must work 23 weeks more, or 65.7 percent longer, to acquire a new
car. Therefore, in physical terms, it costs 65.7 percent more to
buy the car."
** "In 1967, it required 399 weeks of an average worker's
weekly paycheck to purchase a new home (including financing
costs); today it requires 877 paychecks. That is, a worker must
work 478 weeks, or 119.7 percent longer, to acquire a new home.
Therefore, in physical terms, it costs 119.7 percent more to buy
the home."
(For further particulars, readers are referred to the article
in New Federalist.)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
"George" Gets it Right -- Almost
--------------------------------
"George" magazine, in their December 1996 article on the TWA
Flight 800 crash ("When the Nation is Clueless"), quotes this
editor. Most of their reportage of my comments to them during an
interview for the article is fairly accurate. However one part
in which I am quoted is misleading: "Asked why Flight 800 has
become a cause celebre while the ValuJet crash has not, Redman
replied, 'The number-one thing is that the FBI is investigating
this,'..."
Here's how that portion of the interview really went down:
GEORGE: Why has Flight 800 become a cause celebre while the
ValuJet crash has not?
REDMAN: Well, for starters, about a hundred witnesses swear they
saw a missile headed toward TWA 800. Also, my sources were
unanimous in saying a missile was involved. So it's reasonable
to suspect, since the missile angle is being downplayed, a cover
up might be going on.
GEORGE: But what about the FBI? Why don't people trust them?
Tell me something about the FBI's involvement in this.
REDMAN: The FBI has a bad reputation. For example with the JFK
investigation and also with the death of Martin Luther King.
When news of King's death reached some FBI offices, wild cheering
broke out. I'm not 100 percent confident in the FBI, so I tend
to not always believe what they have to say."
The above is not an exact transcription of the conversation,
but it gives the gist of it. Note how, due to "George's"
selective editing of that segment of our interview, it appears in
their article as if I'm saying something like, "Since the FBI is
investigating, there must be a cover-up." That is *not* what I
said and the article in the Dec. 1996 "George" is misleading in
that part.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

89
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-66.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 66
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CN OPERATION POLICY CHANGES
===========================
With the huge amount of information flowing through Conspiracy
Nation (CN) daily, I am forced to make some changes in operation.
1) I ask that info that you wish forwarded via the mailing list
be limited to a 1 or 2 paragraph press release. Please just
summarize whatever your information is and include if possible
whatever web page it is available at (or an e-mail address where
you can be contacted). That way those who are interested in
further details can read further if they wish.
This change in policy is necessary because I am having to
read through the various messages I get and make a decision if I
should pass it along. When I am receiving many 10-page articles
it becomes impossible for me to read through every one and decide
if it's worth passing along. So please, just write a short
summary of what it's about with a web address and/or e-mail
address for those who are interested.
I realize that I am a fallible human and that what I decide
is worth passing along is subject to error, but I do what I can.
2) Press releases I send out will all bear the subject heading of
"CN Press Release". That way, those wishing only to read the
Conspiracy Nation articles can easily skip the rest, should they
wish to. Conspiracy Nation articles will go out as usual, with
subject heading of "Conspiracy Nation Vol. xx Num. xx".
3) I have added many links to conspiracy related web sites at the
Conspiracy Nation web site:
http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
under the category "other sites." Should you wish your site
included there, let me know. If I forget, keep pestering me.
I believe the new policy changes are a reasonable way to handle
the increasing volume of conspiracy related material being made
available. The new policy will better utilize the mail list
facilities than the current policy which I suspect is overloading
people with information. (At least I am getting overloaded.)
The explosion of conspiracy related information is, I believe, a
good thing. Right under the noses of the so-called
"intelligentsia" a tremendous paradigm upheaval is occurring.
One or two timid academicians are even getting "daring" enough to
take a look at the phenomena and offer a course or two on the
subject. (But can the state-certified intellectuals take an
honest look at conspiracy "theory?")
Incidentally, I welcome conspiracy-related items from all sides
of the political spectrum, so-called "left" and "right." Just
please have mercy on the poor editor and limit your proposed press
releases to a paragraph or two summarizing the information, with
the address of the web site where more details can be found (or
your e-mail address).
Thank you, from Conspiracy Nation!
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

124
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-67.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 67
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Welcome to the World of
RUMOR MILL NEWS
=======================
Here begins several reports from the October 1996 issue of Rumor
Mill News. Let me start by saying I now know who the chief
editor of this news outlet is and, as I often say, this person is
"not a lightweight."
Readers will be hearing a lot from this alternative news outlet
for awhile, so "chin up" and "hunker down." Undoubtedly a few
whiners will send messages saying that "we" are "tired of Rumor
Mill News." This has happened in the past with Mr. Skolnick's
articles, when persons calling themselves "we" demanded I send
out something different, "or else." But then, during Mr.
Skolnick's dry spells, I began to get messages from "we"
complaining "Where's Sherman Skolnick? Why aren't you sending
out his stuff lately? 'We' want Skolnick!"
What it means is, you can't please everybody, so why try? Here
is the first of several Rumor Mill News items.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
We started our News Agency in June of 1996. It was created as an
attempt to take the truth to a wider audience. From the
responses we have received, our attempt has been successful.
Some of the most important pieces of news only run one time on
CNN or are buried at the back of newspapers. Our News Hounds
scour all the news outlets seeking the buried pieces of important
news that allow our readers to understand the big picture.
In addition to RMNews Hounds, we have RMNews Sources. These
Sources are many of the same ones that are quoted by the major
news outlets. However, RMNews does not edit their stories, nor
do we only print part of their information. Our Sources are part
of governments around the world. Here in the United States, they
are in all branches of government, both elected and appointed.
They come from the military and the intelligence communities.
And they all know that if they supply us with a news tip, it will
get printed, as they wrote it... sometimes... even with the
mistakes.
In addition, we are supplied with stories by reporters whose own
news outlets are afraid to print or air them, or who choose to
censor the stories because they reflect badly on the owners of
the major news networks.
We have chosen a tabloid approach because today's media style
turns most people off. Even though we try to stick to the
tabloid style, every now and then the story is so overwhelming in
scope or human tragedy, that the tabloid style is inappropriate.
We at Rumor Mill News feel that our own information is about as
close to the real Truth as you are going to get here in the
United States. In case you haven't noticed, the major media
keeps us dumbed down as to what is really going on in the world.
The only way the American people and the people of the world are
going to retain their God-given freedoms is to wake up and
realize that there IS a conspiracy to steal our freedom and make
us slaves.
RMNews is read by conspiracy newcomers and old hacks. It is read
by other news outlets and current and retired intelligence
officers. These people know that our information is as current
and as accurate as it gets.
We call our stories rumors because we do not have the time or the
money to defend them as legitimate news.
As you will see, when we make mistakes or rush to print too soon,
we make clarifications or offer Rumor Retractions. Our ego is
not involved here, only the truth.
You will see, as you read this issue of Rumor Mill News, that we
are a work in progress. Maybe with time, effort, and money, we
can evolve into a full fledged news magazine. That is our goal.
Thank you for your support of Rumor Mill News.
RMNews Agency
PO Box 1784
Aptos, CA 95001-1784
Message Center Phone: 408-699-4135
RMNews is published by RMN Publishing
Ru Mills, Editor
The June/July/August issues of RMNews are now available for
$10.00. Monthly issues are $5.00 and mailed at the end of each
month. At the moment we are not offering yearly subscriptions,
but stay with us, maybe someday we will! [CN: *caveat emptor.*]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

105
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-68.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 68
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Military Alert!!!
=================
Tailhook Part Two
Army/Navy Being Discredited
Top Echelon Officers
Set Up To Be Fired or Arrested
Clinton Strikes First To Avert or Contain
A Military Coup
Rumor Mill News, Nov. 1996 -- In the September edition of Rumor
Mill News we discussed the government disinformation that was
being leaked to destroy the United States Navy. If you do not
have a copy of that issue, send $5.00 for the issue or $2.00 for
the segment on "Tailhook Two." [CN: *caveat emptor*. Address
is listed in back issue, CN 9.67.]
In the article we told the story of the Navy Aegis class
destroyer that fired the missile which brought down TWA 800...
But, we also told the real story of what happened to TWA 800.
It was a government missile that brought it down... a
Sledgehammer missile made by Litton Industries sometime before
the mid 70's. In the mid 70's it and many others were stolen
from a National Guard warehouse.
The missile was used to bring down TWA 800 because of the
counterfeit bearer bonds that were on board. Just last week I
received news that some of the bearer bonds had been retrieved
and my story about them being counterfeit was being investigated
by the FBI.
If they are proven to be counterfeit, then the people responsible
for the downing of TWA 800 would be the ones who have the most to
lose. Follow the money trail and you will have the answer as to
who shot down TWA 800. I heard through an excellent source that
it was David Rockefeller who leaked the phony story about the
Navy shooting down TWA 800.
But why is the story being leaked again right now? It is because
over the weekend right before the election there was either a
military coup or an attempt at one. There have been at least two
times in my lifetime when the military assumed command of the
country without the American public being aware of it.
The most recent time was on July 9, 1992 when they took the
"football" away from George Bush and told him to "lose the
election... or else." Right after Nixon was forced to step down
there was a book released called "Silent Coup." It named the
high ranking military officers who were responsible for bringing
down Nixon.
Something happened this Halloween and then again over the weekend
preceding the election. These things are covered fully in the
October issue of RMNews. We don't know yet what happened.
Either a military coup happened or Clinton struck the first blow
by arresting the leaders of the "coup."
This story about the Navy downing TWA 800 is pure disinformation.
I am including the September story I wrote about the downing of
TWA 800 with this brief warning to military men. {1}.
The Army is just beginning its version of Tailhook. If you don't
wake up right now, all the senior officers who are loyal to the
Constitution and America will go the way of the top Navy brass.
Wake Up, Military Men of America!! You are about to become
history. Share this with all military men and women, before it
is too late!
---------------------------<< Notes >>---------------------------
{1} I hope to cover the September RMNews story on TWA 800 soon.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

138
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-69.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 69
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TWA 800: WHAT REALLY HAPPENED?
==============================
The Government Rumor Mill Cranks Up
-----------------------------------
RMNews Agency, Sept. 5, 1996 -- All the puzzle pieces are laid
on the floor of a hangar in New York. Various government
agencies are engaged in the difficult task of trying to piece
together the story of what happened to TWA Flight 800.
Unfortunately, even if the dedicated researchers do discover the
truth of the downing of TWA 800, there is little chance that the
American people will ever be told.
The government rumor mill has begun to crank out first class
disinformation. It is designed to cover all bases, and prevent
the American people from ever discovering the truth... which
would implicate our government, the Federal Reserve, and the
international banking community in the murder of 230 innocent
people.
Disinformation is a common tactic used by the government to
obfuscate, blur, cloud, confuse, and otherwise keep the truth
from being known. Whenever private researchers and investigators
get too close to the truth, the disinformation specialists leap
into action. Such is the case with TWA 800.
Over the long Labor Day weekend, various fax networks and radio
shows broke a story in which a TWA pilot supposedly came forward
and told the truth about the downing of the airplane. According
to his story, which was provided in a government sponsored secret
briefing, the plane was hit by a missile fired from an Aegis
class Navy destroyer. The Navy ship which allegedly fired the
missile was similar to the USS Vincennes, which "accidentally"
fired a missile and downed an Iranian airliner. As with all
disinformation, this story is believeable, and just in case
anyone doubted that such a thing could ever happen, the
government created a story that almost paralleled an identical
shootdown.
The story is a good one, and it ties up all the loose ends. It
explains why so many people saw something streaking toward the
airliner. It explains why the government is taking so long to
tell the American people what really happened. It explains the
traces of explosives. It explains why all four engines came up
intact. It explains the rumors of National Guard maneuvers. It
explains why an international manhunt has not begun. The story
answers all the questions the American people and the victims'
families have been asking. Unfortunately, it is not the truth.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
"The White House is the biggest rumor mill in the
land. They put out more disinformation than any
other group in government." -- RMNews Euro Chief
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Over the long weekend RMNews sources were deluged with
information. Secret meetings seemed to be going on everywhere.
David Rockefeller had summoned the board members of the Federal
Reserve to an emergency meeting in Jackson Hole, Wyoming.
Leaders of the American Patriot movement were summoned to a
meeting in Washington, DC. TWA executives and senior pilots were
summoned to a secret briefing regarding the downing of TWA Flight
800.
According to RMNews sources, the version presented at the secret
TWA briefing said that Flight 800 was the victim of a National
Guard training accident. TWA personnel were told that Flight 800
was shot down by a rocket fired from shore, during a training
exercise. This version closely resembles the truth, but it is
dramatically different from the White House version that was
supposedly leaked by a TWA pilot. By the time the White House
put their slant on the story, it was barely recognizable as the
same TWA briefing.
Over the long Labor Day weekend, our RMNews Euro Chief filed his
report. You will not like what you read, but it does explain all
the disinformation that has been circulating over the weekend.
The truth is known about what caused the downing of TWA Flight
800. The European intelligence agencies have put the puzzle
together. There are those in our government who do not want the
truth to ever be told. They know that others know the truth and
it is beginning to seep out; therefore they have cranked up their
mighty Wurlitzer and begun the disinformation overture.
To understand how successful a government disinformation campaign
can be, all one has to do is think about the assassination of
John Kennedy. The government put out the official version, and
then they created hundreds of cover stories with supporting films
and documents. Each of these cover stories takes years and
thousands of hours to pursue. Private investigators have neither
the time nor the money to track down every story, and so many
alternative news sources innocently print or air government
created disinformation, thinking that it comes from a reliable
independent source.
The story on Flight 800, which we recently received from our
European source, explains the reason for the many different cover
stories that are being put out. Since we are also dealing with a
story of personal grief, horror and tragedy, we have chosen to
file this story exactly as we received it, with no editorial
comments.
-+- RMNews Presents the Unedited Story -+-
[...to be continued...]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

205
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-70.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 70
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TWA 800: WHAT REALLY HAPPENED?
==============================
The Government Rumor Mill Cranks Up
-----------------------------------
(RMNews Agency, Sept. 5, 1996)
[...continued...]
-+- RMNews Presents the Unedited Story -+-
"There was no Air Force plane dropping Willy Peter flares into
the black sky. There was white phospherous present, but it
wasn't in flares launched as decoys for heat seeking missiles.
Your American sources have been caught up in misinformation. The
Willy Peter came from the missile itself. It wasn't a singular
payload missile! It was a double headed missile. It had White
Phospherous to penetrate the skin and all layers of the fuel cell
to erupt into fire." {1}.
"The high explosive portion of the warhead, in fact, detonated
right below the cockpit door. Because of the Willy Peter burning
into the skin, droplets of an orange, fiery mass fell into the
Atlantic before the explosion, which tore the plane into two
parts. The fuel cell erupted into the first fire ball just about
2 seconds before the explosion of the H.E. (high explosive)
segment separated the cockpit from the plane. The fire spread
quickly, although the aft section of the fuselage began its
almost vertical descent into the water. (RMNews has chosen to
omit the next several sentences out of concern for the victims'
families.)"
"What has not been mentioned in any paper because it's classified
is that one fuel cell didn't have time to rupture and catch fire.
It was recovered intact. The pieces of the weapon that were
recovered match my description of a 'Sledgehammer Rocket.' The
missile came from a National Guard Armory, and was not one of the
Stinger missiles that the Afghani rebels offered to sell back to
the government."
"'Sledgehammer Rockets' were produced by Litton Light Arms
Division, a division of 'Litton Commercial Industries.'
'Sledgehammer Rockets' have nothing to do with Operation
Sledgehammer which is an economic unit to disrupt new issues
trading on the market. There are small parts that can turn into
terror groups, but it is not the intent of the operation.
Operation Sledgehammer has nothing to do with the downing of TWA
800. The name is the same as the missile that downed it. That's
all."
"The 'Sledgehammer Rocket' was part of a robbery from a National
Guard Armory in North Carolina in the late 70's. The rest of the
stolen munitions were recently recovered in a warehouse in
Montana. They were stolen by an underground, homegrown terrorist
group that has been active for over 20 years."
"About 20 years ago, an operation was introduced by William Casey
(the head of the Reagan 1980 Presidential campaign, who was
appointed Director of the CIA.) He was the head of the SEC
(Securities Exchange Commission) at the time. In 1976, billions
of dollars of counterfeit bonds and debentures were introduced
into the world economies. The bonds had a 10-15 and 20 year
maturity rate, before they were to be pulled out of circulation.
Many banks in the U.S. also held billions of this phoney money.
The last batch, the ones earmarked 20 years, was to come due in
September of this year, in Paris. The bulk of these bearer bonds
were 20-year bonds. It is possible that an entire section of the
forward freight compartment of that plane was carrying a cargo of
phony bonds. There are no duplicates of these or any of the
other bonds in existence. Untold billions of dollars, gathered
from all over the country, may very well have been the intended
victim of TWA 800. It is only during the last 10 years or so
that commercial airliners carried such freight. We used to
charter cargo transporters to carry such cargo. If our theory
holds any water and the phony paper was on board the TWA flight,
hundreds of billions of dollars of debt would have been wiped out
by downing the plane. In that case it was an internal operation
without regard for any human life on board."
"All indications speak of a rocket. No bomb would have left
light bulbs intact! Such an act would have saved, or helped
save, the national economy. If the bonds had come due, and were
proved to be phony, there would have been one hell of a market
crash. The American economy would have been destroyed, food
shortages, riots and warring factions would have been created.
Martial law would have been declared, maybe even U.N. troops
would have been brought in to 'keep the peace.' Now that all the
phony paper has been destroyed, the market crash probably has
been averted. It was the perfect solution, and no one will ever
know. Those who planned the move sacrificed 230 lives to save
the American economy. As if there wasn't another way..."
"Lloyds of London is currently involved in this same 'bad paper'
operation. They have been asking their investors to accept a
percentage of the value of the paper they hold. No one has
bothered to explain the Lloyds disaster to their investors. They
have used their other holdings to cover the bad bonds."
"Banks in France have also discovered that they hold counterfeit
bonds. But they didn't kill anyone to destroy them, they merely
set a fire that gutted the entire third floor of Credit Lyonaisse
in Paris. Presumably that is where they stored their phony
bonds."
"Every institution chooses their own way of handling the 'bad
paper' crisis. Too bad a few more fires couldn't have been
started. A lot of good people would still be alive."
"The truth of why and how the big bird was downed will never be
told to the public. It will also serve to push TWA back into
Chapter 11, from where it just emerged, less than a year ago.
From what you tell me, TWA has been given a phony story... one
that is close to the truth and will keep TWA quiet. The
government probably told them that leaking the truth to the
public would undermine morale and national security."
-+- The Pieces Fit Together -+-
[...to be continued...]
---------------------------<< Notes >>---------------------------
{1} "It was a double headed missile. It had White Phospherous to
penetrate the skin and all layers of the fuel cell to erupt into
fire."
From "Bill Clinton's Choo-Choo" by J. Orlin Grabbe (8/24/96):
Why did the missile glow as it ascended toward the plane?
Because the ordinary warhead of the Stinger had been
replaced with a phosphorous warhead. (This replacement is
not difficult.) Phosphorous incandesces as it travels
through the atmosphere at high speed. Analysis of the
photos shows that it was the *head*, not the tail, of the
missile that was glowing. A spectral analysis shows the
head was phosphorous.
From "The Phosphorous-Headed Missile and TWA Flight 800" by J.
Orlin Grabbe (8/26/96):
In "Bill Clinton's Choo-Choo" I reported that TWA Flight
800 had been taken down by a missile with a phosphorous
head.
The phosphorous head was originally designed to take out
fuel tanks. An oil storage tank, for example. The
low-powered explosive behind the phosphorous scatters it
somewhat, and the glowing phosphorous ignites the
surrounding fuel in the target. This type of missile is
well-known in the intelligence community.
The exterior surface of the phosphorous warhead is covered
with a substance that flakes off in the atmosphere. The
phosphorous will not be exposed until the missile travels a
certain distance. Then the exposed phosphorous will begin
to incandesce. The missile is laser-guided to a locked-in
target from the body behind the head, and the glowing head
does not interfere with the missile's guidance system.
(This system differs from a normal Stinger, which has a
passive infrared seeker.)
About six inches behind the missile's phosphorous head is a
small door that gives access to the missile's three or four
computer boards. These boards guide the missile to its
target, set the detonation configuration, and so on.
In this missile, the explosive behind the head and the
missile propellant are one and the same. It represents a
more recent technological development than C-12.
The sophistication of the missile suggests it was stolen
from military inventory or purchased from a foreign power
(one of the many to which the U.S. sells similar
munitions).
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

203
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-71.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,203 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 71
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TWA 800: WHAT REALLY HAPPENED?
==============================
The Government Rumor Mill Cranks Up
-----------------------------------
(RMNews Agency, Sept. 5, 1996)
[...continued...]
-+- The Pieces Fit Together -+-
The story given to RMNews by the Euro Station Chief allows us to
separate the wheat from the chaff and the rumor from reality.
One of the earliest reports filed by RMNews was of the Air Force
plane that was dropping Willy Peter [flares]. Since our source
for that story knew that Willy Peter was seen around Flight 800,
it seemed logical to assume that it came from the National Guard
plane that was flying maneuvers in the area. And our logical
conclusion was that the government knew a missile attack was
possible, and was dropping Willy Peter to attract heat-seeking
missiles.
None of our American sources were familiar with double-headed
Sledgehammer missiles, therefore it never would have occurred to
them that the Willy Peter was in the missile. As they scrambled
to make the early Euro info fit in with their info, there were
many misinterpreted bits of information.
The moment the name of the missile was supplied to us by our
European station chiefs, our American sources misinterpreted the
information and thought the missile came from Operation
Sledgehammer armament stores. The unedited story supplied by our
Euro Chief should have cleared up all accidental rumors put out
by our sources. When a story as monumental as this one crosses
our desk, there will be minor mistakes in our rush to get to
print. The main point we made in our TWA 800 issue was that the
airliner was brought down by a missile. On that score, we were
on target.
Other RMNews sources have reported that the missile casing was
found on the shore, and it was a missile whose serial number
matched one from National Guard armories. This piece of
information fits in with the disinformation story put out that
the missile was part of a National Guard training mission. Can
you begin to understand how clever pieces of disinformation are
sprinkled into a story to keep the truth from ever being known?
The missile did come from a National Guard Armory, but it was
stolen from there over 20 years ago. It was not a missile that
was part of a training exercise that supposedly was going on at
the time TWA 800 was destroyed.
Another rumor that was circulating at the time Flight 800 was
downed was that Henry Kissinger was on board. After running the
European Station Chief's story past several of our American
sources, they felt that Kissinger being on board would explain
how the government tricked a home grown terrorist group into
downing that particular plane.
Kissinger is hated by almost every underground faction. Some see
him as the man who sacrificed the POWs from Viet Nam. Others see
him as the obedient servant of the international bankers who own
the Federal Reserve. He is definitely part of the ruling elite,
and in many eyes, that is enough to make him a target.
It is only speculation as to how the underground terrorist cell
was convinced to attack TWA 800, but if they had been told
Kissinger was on board, that might explain how they were
convinced to fire on Flight 800. For all we know, the New World
Order elite sacrificed Kissinger. {1}. It is possible that he
really was on board.
Pieces of the disinformation story that circulated over the
weekend report that the landing lights of TWA 800 were on, making
it a perfect target. Our European source has told us that 4 to 5
Sledgehammers were fired, only one hit the plane. Sledgehammers
are not heat-seeking missiles. They have to be aimed accurately.
This is why all four engines were brought up intact. This also
fits with the disinformation story that a Navy [cruiser] fired on
the airliner.
-+- Tailhook II? -+-
Why would the White House want to blame the Navy? The answer to
this question goes back to the death of CNO Jeremy Boorda.
Forget all the crap which was circulated about Admiral Boorda's
medals. His death was not a suicide and it had nothing
whatsoever to do with his combat medals. Admiral Boorda was a
lapdog of the New World Order. He was killed to send a message
to President Clinton. Clinton had appointed Boorda as Chief of
Naval Operations in order to further demoralize and destroy the
Navy.
The Navy harbors the American resistance force to the New World
Order. This is identical to the resistance force that battled
Adolph Hitler. Admiral Wilhelm Canaris headed the German Abwehr,
the German WWII version of the CIA. It was the Abwehr that
conspired to assassinate Hitler. The German Navy, especially the
U-Boat captains, were loyal to Canaris, who was the real head of
the Navy, while he ran German intelligence.
The same pattern of resistance is being carried on in today's
Navy. Operation Tailhook was created by the denizens of the NWO
to ferret out all independent thinking, loyal American Naval
officers. The most independent and brazen Naval officers are the
Top Jock Flyboy Aviators who land on floating football fields.
Representative Patricia Schroeder (D., Colorado) was given the
job of bringing down the Flyboys. It was easy to do this. The
Navy has a long history of crude, vulgar and disgusting stag
parties. All Miss Schroeder had to do was wait for her marching
orders to be given, and she could find dozens of parties where
Naval Officers have behaved in a manner unbecoming to an officer
and a gentleman. Every Naval officer has attended such parties.
Their existence is legion! But her orders were to destroy the
morale of the Navy, and to do this she had to attack the pride of
the Navy... Naval aviators. Her Tailhook attack is history now.
She ruined the careers of thousands of Naval officers. The elite
aviators are history. The heroes of the Navy were brought down.
This current attack on the Navy is the first part of a two prong
attack which will eventually end up targeting the Navy Submarine
corps. While the flyboys of the Navy may be the handsome,
dashing officers that movies are made about, the brains of the
Navy is in the Submarine Corps. No one ever hears about the
submariners. They run silent and deep. In other words, they do
not brag about their activities and they keep their thoughts and
plans private.
Just as the German submarine force backed Admiral Canaris and his
resistance movement, so too does the American submarine force
harbor the American resistance to the New World Order... which is
made up of the same groups and families that financially backed
Adolph Hitler. {2}. The American resistance movement is hidden
in the Navy and based on the floor of the ocean.
The first prong of the disinformation attack has accused a Navy
[cruiser] of firing the missile. When a top secret Congressional
and military review panel concludes that all missiles on Aegis
class [cruisers] are accounted for, then the investigation will
turn to the submarine fleet. As usual, submariners will delay
giving any information to Congress or the President. The longer
they delay, the more the disinformation and rumors will
circulate. Eventually the White House rumor mill will have
circulated so much disinformation that it will eventually seep
into the mainstream media. When it does, the Navy submarine
corps will have to surface and face Congressional inquiry. Those
who aren't forced to resign will have their careers ended in
other ways... accidents and being passed over for promotion are
two that come to mind. {3}
---------------------------<< Notes >>---------------------------
{1} At this point it is doubtful that Kissinger was onboard TWA
Flight 800. However as a means to motivate a terrorist group to
attack the flight, by telling them (erroneously) that Kissinger
would be onboard, the story is plausible.
{2} "...the New World Order... which is made up of the same
groups and families that financially backed Adolph Hitler."
For more on the Nazi roots of the "New World Order," see the
December 1996 issue of the Conspiracy Nation newsletter. For
info on how to get the newsletter, send e-mail to
bigred@shout.net
{3} Because Rumor Mill News is not widely available, I am
providing information on how to order the latest issue by mail.
Note that I have no financial benefit in offering this
information. *caveat emptor*.
Send $5, and basic info such as an address to send to, to
RMNews Agency
PO Box 1784
Aptos, CA 95001-1784
Or phone (408) 699-4135 for more info.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

99
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-72.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 72
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A SMALL-TOWN CONSPIRACY
=======================
Small-town sheriff Andrew Taylor receives a letter from an
ex-convict, informing him that he will be visiting the town soon.
The letter is cryptic: it says only that the ex-con wishes to
"settle a score."
Sheriff Taylor recalls that long ago he had shot the author of
the letter, wounding him in the leg and causing him thereafter to
walk with a limp.
Alarmed by the potential for danger to his associate and friend
the sheriff, Deputy Barnard Fife conspires with a gas station
attendant by name of Gomer Pyle, and with one Otis Campbell, an
habitue of the local jail (Mr. Campbell appears to have a
drinking problem), to secretly guard Sheriff Taylor. Noticeably
absent from the plot is a local barber known as "Floyd."
The ex-con arrives by bus. He gets off the common carrier and
limps to an unknown destination. Ominously, he carries a case
containing what appears to be a rifle or shotgun.
Complicating things still further is the fact that Deputy Fife,
although armed with a pistol, in fact has no bullets in that
pistol (although he does carry *one* bullet in a shirt pocket.)
The sheriff himself carries no weapon.
At home that evening with his son and an aunt who performs
housekeeping chores for Sheriff Taylor, the phone rings. It is
the ex-con saying he is coming to the Taylor residence to pay a
visit. The aunt, Beatrice, promptly takes the sheriff's son and
deserts the premises.
Unknown to the sheriff, secret bodyguards Pyle and Campbell are
nearby.
The ex-con, limping and still carrying the apparent rifle or
shotgun, arrives. He is a mean-looking fellow. The unarmed
sheriff invites him in.
At this point, Deputy Fife arrives. He and his secret team peer
in through the window. They see the ex-con pull a shotgun from
the case he is carrying.
Thinking quickly, Deputy Fife pulls the electric fuses for
Sheriff Taylor's home. Then, he, Pyle, and Campbell, carrying
stout rope, rush in the back door.
But, in the meantime, the sheriff and the ex-con have exited via
the front door. Inside the house, in the darkness, the deputy
and his assistants bungle badly and end up in knots.
Outside, the sheriff fixes the fuses, the lights go back on, and
he and the ex-con peer in through the window. They both laugh at
what they see. It turns out that the shotgun was a present given
to Sheriff Taylor as supposed "thanks" for helping the ex-con
straighten up and turn his life around.
BUT, how is it that the ex-con, a felon, can have a shotgun to
give to the sheriff? And what about this Otis Campbell fellow
who, under the guise of being intoxicated, is "coincidentally"
privy to police intelligence? And most especially, why is it
that the "good sheriff" employs incompetent Fife as deputy -- is
the sheriff afraid that a *real* deputy might catch on to
something?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

201
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-73.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 73
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PROVOCATEURS AND THE OKLAHOMA BOMBINGS
======================================
By Sherman H. Skolnick
----------------------
It is a fact of history. All the years the ultra rich and what
some call their puppet government were determined to wreck
grassroots movements that counter their policies. In the 1960s
and 70s, for example, put in by the American CIA: pretended
leaders of the Peace Movement, heavily-funded fakers. In those
years I taught a seminar for university students: how to finger
agent provocateurs, a French term meaning those who infiltrate a
dissident group to destroy them, such as steering them into the
hands of the local police, or, the Secret Police such as the ATF,
the FBI, and others.
I used to tell my students: Buy some cotton, plug up your ears
when you are in the presence of someone you suspect of being a
provocateur. That is, do not study his rhetoric; rather, check
out where they popped up from and where their money comes from.
I and my associates became experts on CIA-linked foundations
whose tax returns are a public record. Some people forget that
in the Spring of 1967 there were devastating disclosures that the
CIA had a string of foundations they funded and controlled
through a three-step procedure of deception called (1) conduits
and (2) pass-throughs (sort of a cut-out between the CIA and the
ultimate foundation recipients) and (3) fronts, a technical term
rather than just slang. Studying what went on before that date
was a starting point for scrutinizing CIA foundations, then and
now. (Reference: New York Times Index, 1967 volume.)
We began an intensive probe of the "Chicago Seven," those charged
with helping instigate the riots at the 1968 Democratic
Convention in Chicago: Rennie Davis, Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin,
Tom Hayden, etc. Their rhetoric was planned and polished;
virtually impossible to penetrate their words. Some 250 thousand
dollars and more funded their operation, coming from the Roger
Baldwin Foundation which, in turn, got its funding from the Aaron
Norman Fund, the J.M. Kaplan Foundation of New York, and the New
World Foundation.
Careful scrutiny showed the Baldwin Foundation took over, in
1967, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). So, thereafter
they used a series of names, such as the Roger Baldwin Foundation
of ACLU. The American Civil Liberties Union does not exist as a
separate entity, like prior to 1967. Yet press-fakers continue
to refer to the ACLU as if there is a separate such thing. The
whole operation is part of a CIA apparatus which finances and
controls a substantial portion of so-called "liberal" movements
and magazines. For example, The Nation magazine gets part of
their funding through that group. That magazine *does* criticize
foreign operations of CIA *but* *not* *domestic* *ones*.
In 1972, I got arrested inside a Chicago television station
confronting on these matters Rennie Davis doing a live show. I
beat the rap in court by subpoenaing the Chicago Station Chief of
CIA. The spy agency, by the way, is not supposed to have
domestic operations but they do. The Chicago riots caused a
backlash installing Nixon, president.
Another major turning point was in April, 1995: the multiple
bombings at a federal building in Oklahoma City. We became
suspicious of the numerous publications and talk shows that
sprang up from nowhere, just before or just after the tragedy.
One such was Media Bypass magazine, headquartered in Evansville,
Indiana. They started with a very small circulation. The
publisher was Jim Thomas. Earlier in his career he was a
military electronics expert; he says he had top security
clearance and once worked on the atomic bomb.
On the day of the Oklahoma bombings, Jim Thomas hired, to write
about the event, Lawrence W. Myers, a talented writer of several
books on bomb making and remote bomb triggers. Myers' books were
published by Palladin Press which, like Soldier of Fortune
magazine, is reportedly a CIA proprietary.
The circulation of Media Bypass magazine shot way up. It was
supposedly the voice of the militias, the tax protester movement,
and the state sovereignty movement. President Clinton
electrified the nation by suddenly appearing on CBS's "60
Minutes" program, after the Oklahoma bombings. He accused the
militias of being somehow involved and dedicated to overthrowing
the central government; all of that denied by those claiming to
be militia leaders.
Soon, Lawrence W. Myers became the chief investigative reporter
for Media Bypass. He wrote stories about the Oklahoma event
which some savvy folks suspected were slanted to favor a
government cover-up, blaming the whole thing on a sort of Lee
Harvey McVeigh, the lone bomber/assassin. But who paid attention
that Myers had been a counter-terrorism expert with Wackenhut,
the privatized adjunct to the American CIA. The spy agency used
Wackenhut, a private firm, to defeat Freedom of Information
requests. After all, the federal law forcing, supposedly, some
disgorging of documents, applied only to federal agencies, not
private firms.
Myers wielding so much power at Media Bypass, some claimed he was
sort of the gate-keeper, deciding what stories, if any, were to
be published. The magazine ran provocative advertisements
proclaiming you did not have to pay federal income tax unless you
lived in a federal territory or enclave like the District of
Columbia. Readers were urged to contact the advertisers for more
data. Was this a way of compiling a list of "victims" for the
IRS firing squad?
Some right-wing activists began complaining that Myers liked to
pick their brains on the telephone. He had an arrogant way of
somehow extracting information. When I wrote about this in
March, 1996, in commentaries on Internet, publisher Jim Thomas
denied there was espionage involving Myers. But in November,
1996, Thomas called me stating that readers were cancelling
subscriptions because of their views on Myers; so Thomas fired
Myers but said he could find no proof Myers was with CIA.
To try to divert my attention, Thomas pointed an accusing finger
at Jeremiah Films, a California firm that produces video catering
to the Christian Patriot movement. Thomas said he also fired
Troy Underhill, once a staff member at Media Bypass. According
to Thomas, Underhill was some kind of felon who was an operative
or fink for IRS and FBI and now has a key position with Jeremiah
Films. Another FBI informant or operative acting as a consultant
to Jeremiah Films is a person using the fake name of "John
Bennett," Thomas says.
Thomas could not explain, however, how it was that some of these
same spies were at one time running his magazine or, like
Jeremiah Films, taking expensive, full back-cover ads in Media
Bypass.
As always, the makers & shakers are trying to control what we
think and say.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Mr. Skolnick, since 1963, has been founder/chairman of a
public-interest group, CITIZENS' COMMITTEE TO CLEAN UP THE
COURTS, researching and disclosing certain instances of judicial
corruption and political murders. Since 1971, as editor of
updates of the group's work, called HOTLINE NEWS, a 5-minute
recorded phone message, changed several times per week -- a
regular phone call -- (312) 731-1100. (Area code may soon change
to 773.) Since 1991, a regular participant, now moderator, of a
popular, public access cable TV program, called "Broadsides", in
Chicago and suburbs -- on most every Monday evening in Chicago,
on Channel 21 cable, 9 p.m., available to some 400,000
households. His comments appear on Internet on several websites;
archives of his stories can be pulled up and printed out. Also,
on Internet, his stories appear on some five categories of news
groups, such as alt.conspiracy and alt.activism. (See also
http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html and see also ftp.shout.net
pub/users/bigred) Office (8 a.m. to midnight, 7 days): (312)
375-5741. 9800 So. Oglesby Avenue, Chicago, IL 60617-4870. Call
before sending FAX. NOTE THAT THE NEW AREA CODE, 773, WAS TO
HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED BY NOW. IF 312 AREA CODE FAILS, TRY AREA
CODE 773. (After October 12, 1996, AREA CODE changes to 773.)
A few highlights of the group's work: Caused the biggest bribery
scandal in U.S. history, the collapse of the Illinois Supreme
Court, 1969. Investigation of the sabotaged Watergate plane
crash, 1972-73. 12 Watergate figures perished including Mrs. E.
Howard Hunt, wife of the Watergate burglar. One of the first to
comment on the Vice President Spiro Agnew bribery mess, resulting
in his downfall, 1973. Investigation and disclosure causing the
jailing for bribery of the highest level sitting federal judge in
American history, Chicago Federal Appeals Judge Otto Kerner, Jr.,
1973. Touching off "Operation Greylord," in which 20 local
judges and 40 lawyers jailed for bribery, 1983-1993.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

199
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-74.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 74
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
NEWS ROUND-UP
=============
News From All Over
------------------
Mario Savio, commonly known as the leader of the 1960s Berkeley
"Free Speech" movement, has died recently. Because his death
comes before the normal full term of human life, there is
suspicion that his death may not have been natural. Is his death
a signal, or at least symbolic, of a decision to crack down on
free speech?
Then again, "Tiny Tim," a sort of singer, has also died
recently. Reading too much into *his* death could lead to
"conclusions" that there is to be a clampdown on all fringe-type
persons.
Conspiracy Nation notes the death of both Mario Savio and
Tiny Tim with sadness. Each, in their own way, showed American
individualism at its best.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
CN reader Thomas Malloy (temalloy@ix.gen.com) warns that the
U.S. government may be planning to impose martial law:
"Last night I attended a very thought provoking lecture
sponsored by the Prophecy Club where retired army Chaplin
Colonel James Ammerman spoke. The following assertions are
all attributable to Colonel Ammerman. There are many
closed military reservations in America, Canada and Mexico
which are closed to the public. These bases are now the
home of large numbers of foreign troops who now outnumber
the troops in our military. There are so many German
troops in America that they have their own command center
which is located across the river from the Pentagon."
Malloy's warning is reminiscent of last year's alarming stories
in The Spotlight newspaper regarding Russian military equipment
seen on railroad flatcars in the U.S. But this editor's opinion
of *that* situation is that the Russian equipment was most likely
secretly purchased by the U.S. on the black market -- hence the
need for cover up. I think Spotlight jumped too quickly to
conclusions of Russian military infiltration in last year's
story. Likewise, there are a lot of characters running around
who know that crying "wolf" can get them attention.
Because I get these type of "the sky is falling" type stories
fairly often, I generally am skeptical of them. However I could
be wrong. If you wish to read Malloy's entire story, try
contacting him at his e-mail address given at the start of this
item.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
In an article in the October 1996 Rumor Mill News ("Rumors
and Whispers of Rumors"), the editor writes that President Bill
Clinton "is being set up to be taken down." According to RMNews,
there are two factions in the intelligence "community": the New
World Order (NWO) faction, controlled by George Bush, and the
anti-NWO faction. Apparently, Bill Clinton has turned against or
displeased the NWO faction of late. "Clinton is not part of a
dynasty as is George Bush. Clinton is a throw-away President.
He thinks he is powerful, but this false sense of power will be
his downfall. His ego has prevented him from understanding the
deadliness of the gathering storm."
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
In *Suppressed Truth About The Assassination of Abraham
Lincoln* by Burke McCarty (New York: Gordon Press, 1974), the
author (writing in the 1920s) brings familiar "Popish plot"
mutterings together with the Lincoln assassination to yield a
Vatican plot behind the assassination. What the book lacks in
evidence it makes up for by re-hashing anti-Catholic ideas. The
book may be hard to find; I only got a look at it thanks to the
helpfulness of the Lincoln Library at the University of Illinois.
Supposedly, the fact that Abe Lincoln, "a barefoot, nameless
boy on poverty's path could, by his own efforts [become
President]" galled the "'Divine Right' croakers and merited their
most unceasing hatred." Thus, says McCarty, "the death of
Abraham Lincoln was instigated by the 'Black' pope, the General
of the Jesuit Order, camouflaged by the 'White' pope, Pius IX,
aided and abetted by other 'Divine Righters' of Europe and their
paid agents in this country and French Canada."
In "Clash of the Titans," I touched on this concept of the
"Divine Right of Kings" and how it is inimicable to our own
American ideas of government. The Pope, as Christ's supposed
representative on earth, is an example of this "Divine Right"
concept; in fact, the Catholic Church is run in a top-down,
fascist manner, with all supposed to give blind obedience to
papal "infallibility." Supposedly, european and Catholic "Divine
Righters" could not stomach common man Lincoln as a sort of ruler
and had him killed.
This editor views the true force behind Lincoln's
assassination as either (a) greedy northern businessmen, or (b)
the British. (For more on the British connection, see "Clash of
the Titans.")
McCarty's book is not without merit, however. Here are some
items he gives:
** On July 21, 1773, Pope Clement IV abolished the Society of
Jesus (Jesuits) on grounds that it was immoral, dangerous, and a
menace to the papacy. For this, says the author, Pope Clement
was promptly poisoned. The Society of Jesus was restored by Pope
Pius VII in 1814, roughly concurrent to the Congress of Vienna.
** The Congress of Vienna (1814-15) held its sessions in
secret. Not made clear is whether the Congress of Verona was
subjunct or adjunct to the Congress of Vienna. According to
McCarty, the particular business of the Congress of Verona was
the ratification of Article Six of the Congress of Vienna, which
was a promise to prevent or destroy Popular Governments wherever
found.
** "In 1828 an organization in Vienna was formed which was
called the 'St. Leopold Foundation.' The plan was then, to
operate under the mask of religion, which would insure its safety
from any governmental interference and they hoped to accomplish
by intrigue and innuendo what could not be done by bullets and
bayonets."
** Not checked yet by this editor is an alleged item from the
U.S. Congressional Record (House Bill 1523 of 2/15/1913, pages
3215-16) in which a supposed "secret Jesuit oath" charged as "the
one taken by the members of the Fourth Degree in the [Catholic]
Knights of Columbus" is read into the record. Here are excerpts
from the alleged oath:
"...to the utmost of my power, I shall and will defend this
doctrine and his Holiness' right and customs against all
usurpers of the heretical or Protestant authority... I do
now renounce and disown any allegiance as due to any
heretical king, prince or state named Protestant or
Liberals, or obedience to any of their laws, magistrates or
officers."
[...]
"...I do further promise and declare, that I will, when
opportunity presents, make and wage relentless war,
secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and
Liberals, as I am directed to do and to extirpate and
exterminate them from the face of the whole earth, and that
I will spare neither sex, age nor condition, and that I
will hang, waste, boil, flay, strangle and bury alive these
infamous heretics; rip up the stomachs and wombs of their
women and crush their infants' heads against the wall, in
order to annihilate forever their execrable race."
"That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly
use the POISON CUP, THE STRANGULATION CORD, THE STEEL OF
THE POINARD, OR THE LEADEN BULLET, REGARDLESS OF THE HONOR,
RANK, DIGNITY, OR AUTHORITY OF THE PERSON OR PERSONS
WHATSOEVER MAY BE THEIR CONDITION IN LIFE, EITHER PUBLIC OR
PRIVATE, AS I AT ANY TIME MAY BE DIRECTED SO TO DO BY ANY
AGENT OF THE POPE OR SUPERIOR OF THE BROTHERHOOD OF THE
HOLY FAITH OF THE SOCIETY OF JESUS."
Supposedly, the Catholic hierarchy was behind various
anti-Lincoln items appearing in newspapers late into the American
Civil War. Because many Catholics were slavish to the decrees of
their religion, inferred is that these anti-Lincoln items of
Catholic origin were basically "orders to kill."
Yet beyond circumstantial material, McCarty's book lacks hard
evidence -- such as can be found, for example, in Vaughan
Shelton's book covering suspicious facts of the Lincoln
assassination, *Mask for Treason*.
McCarty also alleges that the "Jesuit Oath" killed...
** William Henry Harrison, "by the poison cup," 4/4/1841;
** Zachary Taylor, "by the poison cup," 7/5/1850;
** Garfield, "by the leaden bullet," 7/2/1881;
** William McKinley, "by the leaden bullet," 9/6/1901.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

138
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-75.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 75
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MORE ON ALLEGED VATICAN PLOT AGAINST ABRAHAM LINCOLN
====================================================
In response to an item in CN 9.74 regarding the possibility
of a 19th-century alliance between the Pope and European
monarchs, CN reader Michael Hoffman II writes:
Catholic theology denies the Divine Right of Kings for both
Catholic and Protestant monarchs. The most distinguished
Catholic political writer in this field (who may have
influenced the American Founders), was the 17th century
Jesuit scholar, Cardinal Robert Bellarmine, who debated the
"Divine Right" proponent, the Protestant King James I of
England. (Luther also upheld the doctrine).
The Catholic Church had always put limits on monarchs.
James and later Louis XIV of France, identified themselves
with God and the state. Bellarmine, at the pope's behest,
contested this (cf. John Clement Rager, "The Political
Philosophy of St. Robert Bellarmine"). In France the
papacy condemned Divine Right as the heresy of Gallicanism.
Of course in the secular realm to this day there are
Catholic reactionaries and royalists who are even willing
to side with the Protestant crown than countenance the
American Revolution. In America however, the Church was
dominated by the Republican Irish who with their bad
experience under the British monarchy embraced the American
system of Republican government wholeheartedly.
Pius IX was very concerned about the Union's use of Irish
Catholics as cannon fodder in the war and issued a letter
to be read in all the churches in Ireland resisting Union
recruiting.
Hoffman does not seem to deny the personification of the Divine
Right concept within the Church itself, just the possibility of
an alliance between the Church and European monarchs. After all,
the Catholic Church is quite blunt about it: the Pope is
(supposedly) God's representative on earth.
But in spite of Hoffman's erudition, as apparent in the excerpt
quoted above, why wouldn't the Catholic Church and European
monarchs have found some common ground? Politics make strange
bedfellows, and a secret agreement between European monarchs and
the Pope is not too far-fetched.
In Burke McCarty's book on the Lincoln assassination (*Suppressed
Truth About the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln*, see CN 9.74),
mention is made of a Rev. Charles Chiniquy, a defrocked Catholic
priest who authored a book called *Fifty Years in the Church of
Rome*. A CN reader was nice enough to send the following,
indicating that Chiniquy's book is still in print:
I am writing to inform you about a book written by a
contemporary of Abraham Lincoln, which appears to confirm
what Burke McCarty is saying. The book is:
"50 Years in the Church of Rome"
by Charles Chiniquy
Copyright 1981
by Jack T. Chick
Published by:
Chick Publications
P.O. Box 662
Chino, Calif. 91710
ISBN: 0-937958-09-3
In Burke McCarty's book, the ex-Rev. Chiniquy, who knew Lincoln,
quotes the great president as having stated as follows:
The common people hear and see the big noisy wheels of the
southern Confederacy cars, and they call him Jeff Davis,
Lee, Thompson, Beauregard, Semmes, or others. They
honestly think that they are the motive power, the first
cause of our troubles, but it is a mistake, the true motive
power is secreted behind the thick walls of the Vatican --
the colleges and schools of the Jesuits; the convents of
the Nuns, the confessional boxes of Rome.
And again, said by Chiniquy to be a statement having been made by
President Lincoln:
Father Chiniquy, I want your views about a thing which is
exceedingly puzzling to me and you are the only one to whom
I would like to speak on the subject. A great number of
Democratic newspapers have been sent me lately, evidently
written by Roman Catholics, publishing that I was born a
Roman Catholic and baptized by a priest. They called me a
renegade and apostate on account of that, and they heaped
upon my head mountains of abuse. Now, no priest of Rome
has ever laid his hand on my head. But the persistency of
the Romish press to present this falsehood to their readers
as gospel truth, must have a meaning. Please tell me, as
briefly as possible, what you think about it.
This, Chiniquy answered, was done solely to incite and justify
the act of assassination in the minds of any Catholic fanatics.
It was, says Chiniquy, equivalent to a command.
Skeptics will rightly point out that as a defrocked Catholic
priest, Chiniquy's claims are dubious. Yet that coin has two
sides: as a defrocked priest, Chiniquy would have been free to
speak his mind.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

149
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-76.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 76
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SHERMAN SKOLNICK'S RECORDED MESSAGE
===================================
(December 3, 1996; Transcription by Conspiracy Nation)
------------------------------------------------------
Hi! Sherman Skolnick, Citizens' Committee to Clean Up the
Courts, 9800 South Oglesby.
So, the pressfakers are suddenly talking about the 25th
Amendment. They say a group is studying how a President can be
removed because of psychiatric problems.
Remember our exclusive stories about the 25th Amendment: it
provides for the Vice President to join with other Executive
branch officials to make a written declaration to Congress that
the President is unable to discharge his duties. And, the Vice
President immediately becomes the acting President. Thereafter,
the removed President can get his office back only upon
challenging the matter in Congress, in or out of session.
Since an early age, William Jefferson Clinton has been with CIA,
acting at times at the behest of the London station chief. Bill
traveled to Europe to spy on anti-Vietnam War activists. He went
to Czechoslovakia and stayed at the home of a top Communist party
official whose son was at Oxford with Bill. That son knew too
much about Clinton and was murdered in Turkey by being thrown off
a roof. Bill endeared himself to CIA by going to Moscow and
returning with a secret transcript of a high-level meeting there
attacking Stalinists.
Later to be his wife, Hillary Rodham had separate duties for CIA,
which was sore at Nixon. She was a staff assistant, with Bernie
Nussbaum, on the Nixon impeachment committee of Congress.
Bill Clinton can be terminated at any time; the ultra-rich are
finished using him and want to throw him away.
Secret files of the DIA and the CIA show Bill Clinton suffers all
the years from split-personality syndrome. Which means, under
pressure he thinks and believes he is someone else. Hey! Is
that the finger on the nuclear button, huh!? (And Bill's
continuing to snort cocaine just makes his mental mess worse.)
As we told you in exclusive stories, prominent Democrats, prior
to the election, demanded, that for the good of the Democrat
party, that Bill resign his office and not run for re-election.
He called them traitors, and threatened reprisals. He later
accused Vice President Al Gore also of plotting against him.
The long-expected release of the indictments against the First
Lady and other past and present White House officials may cause a
more public view of Clinton's psychiatric problems. As the
secret files reveal, Bill cannot take the pressure. (And of
course, he has long been a pathological liar.)
Please note the legal angle: A lunatic cannot be a grand jury or
court witness against other criminals, such as those which have
surrounded him. Likewise, a lunatic cannot be prosecuted but
must, instead, be sent off to the federal brain factory in
Springfield, Missouri (actually a political prison camp.) That
is, there to be pumped full of super tranquilizers so he becomes
a vegetable and remembers nothing.
And what will cause Bill to go further bananas, huh?
ITEM: He wanted White House Deputy Counsel Foster dead, dead,
dead. Because? Foster, on behalf of Hillary, was tracing Bill's
illicit dope funds, parked overseas. Hillary had long expected
to divorce Bill and she wanted to find out where he kept the big
bundles of cash.
ITEM: Bill Clinton shared bribery loot with Commerce Secretary
Ron Brown, who died in a sabotaged plane crash. And then, a
long-time Commerce Department employee was apparently also
murdered: she was very savvy on the corruption in international
trade deals. She was about to appear before a federal grand jury
on the Lippo Group mess and was going to finger the President.
Her body was found in the Commerce Department building. When is
Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr gonna protect grand jury
witnesses who are being, one by one, murdered!?
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Mr. Skolnick, since 1963, has been founder/chairman of a
public-interest group, CITIZENS' COMMITTEE TO CLEAN UP THE
COURTS, researching and disclosing certain instances of judicial
corruption and political murders. Since 1971, as editor of
updates of the group's work, called HOTLINE NEWS, a 5-minute
recorded phone message, changed several times per week -- a
regular phone call -- (312) 731-1100. (Area code may soon change
to 773.) Since 1991, a regular participant, now moderator, of a
popular, public access cable TV program, called "Broadsides", in
Chicago and suburbs -- on most every Monday evening in Chicago,
on Channel 21 cable, 9 p.m., available to some 400,000
households. His comments appear on Internet on several websites;
archives of his stories can be pulled up and printed out. Also,
on Internet, his stories appear on some five categories of news
groups, such as alt.conspiracy and alt.activism. (See also
http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html and see also ftp.shout.net
pub/users/bigred) Office (8 a.m. to midnight, 7 days): (312)
375-5741. 9800 So. Oglesby Avenue, Chicago, IL 60617-4870. Call
before sending FAX. NOTE THAT THE NEW AREA CODE, 773, WAS TO
HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED BY NOW. IF 312 AREA CODE FAILS, TRY AREA
CODE 773. (After October 12, 1996, AREA CODE changes to 773.)
A few highlights of the group's work: Caused the biggest bribery
scandal in U.S. history, the collapse of the Illinois Supreme
Court, 1969. Investigation of the sabotaged Watergate plane
crash, 1972-73. 12 Watergate figures perished including Mrs. E.
Howard Hunt, wife of the Watergate burglar. One of the first to
comment on the Vice President Spiro Agnew bribery mess, resulting
in his downfall, 1973. Investigation and disclosure causing the
jailing for bribery of the highest level sitting federal judge in
American history, Chicago Federal Appeals Judge Otto Kerner, Jr.,
1973. Touching off "Operation Greylord," in which 20 local
judges and 40 lawyers jailed for bribery, 1983-1993.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

162
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-77.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 77
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
P O T P O U R R I
=================
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Once a year, like clockwork, the latest "flu" virus appears.
Like with AIDS having its mysterious origins in "deepest, darkest
Africa," the vague sense is that the yearly influenza virus comes
from a mysterious faraway land: Asia.
My parents always heed the warnings each year to "get your
flu shot." So, a month or two back they went through the yearly
flu-shot ritual. I visited them shortly thereafter. A few days
later, by an interesting "coincidence," I was one of the first to
suffer the latest edition of influenza.
What if. What if our perceptions are bass-ackwards on the
annual flu season? What if the initial introduction of the virus
into the population occurs via the innoculations given to ward
off the virus, and from *there* the disease is spread?
Sound far-fetched? The medical industry has gotten it wrong
before, for example with Beriberi. Beriberi is a fatal illness
caused by lack of vitamin B1. In the 1880s, a Japanese doctor
named Kanehiro Takaki discovered that Beriberi could be cured and
prevented through proper nutrition. He published the results of
his research in Lancet, a British medical journal.
Unfortunately, writes Dr. Peter Duesberg in his book, *Inventing
the AIDS Virus*, "Instead of acknowledging poor nutrition as the
cause of beriberi, the scientific community wantonly disregarded
it. The report had arrived during the height of the
bacteria-hunting craze... and microbe hunters were eager to find
new germs."
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Chosen unanimously to chair the House Government Reform and
Oversight Committee is Rep. Dan Burton (R, Ind.). According to
the Washington Times (National Weekly Edition, 12/8/96), Rep.
Burton has a reputation as one who "goes for the jugular."
Congressman Burton has expressed strong doubts regarding the
official version of Vince Foster's death. For example, in the
Congressional Record of August 2, 1994 (Vol. 140, No. 104) he
states, in part...
Mr. Speaker, over the past several weeks there has been a
lot of questions about the death of Vince Foster and the
connection of his death to the Whitewater investigation,
and I have had nine people on my staff at the Republican
Study Committee and my personal staff and some outside
sources investigating this, because the Committee on
Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs here in the House that
is doing the Whitewater investigation on a party line vote
has limited the scope of the investigation to such a degree
that one Member said that if the same principles had been
applied to the O.J. Simpson case, the one thing you could
ask O.J. Simpson is "How was your trip to Chicago?" You
couldn't ask any other questions. That is how limited the
investigation is. There is a deliberate attempt to
minimize the investigation and, I think, to cover up a lot
of the facts.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
In CN 9.76, Sherman Skolnick mentions the death of a Commerce
Department employee. Some readers may not have heard about this
previously. Here are excerpts from Associated Press, 11/30/96
("Commerce Department Employee Found Dead in Office")....
WASHINGTON (AP) - A Commerce Department employee was found
dead in her fourth-floor office at the agency's downtown
headquarters on Friday.
The body was discovered around 7:45 a.m. by a co-worker
arriving for work, police said.
The woman was identified as Barbara Alice Wise, 48, of
Gambrills, Md. She had worked as a secretary for 14 years
at the department's International Trade Administration.
A preliminary autopsy was unable to determine the cause
of death Friday.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
I received the following e-mail recently, regarding Livingstone
Fagan, one of the few survivors of the Branch Davidian Massacre
near Waco, Texas, April 19, 1993. (For more on that massacre,
see *The Davidian Massacre* by Carol Moore, ISBN 1-880692-22-8,
and *The Ashes of Waco* by Dick J. Reavis, ISBN 0-684-81132-4)
Just a few hours ago Carol Moore allowed me to transcribe
the following crucial details excerpted from Livingston's
letter dated 09/28/96:
.... the scars and bruises from threats and physical
assaults sustained since my arrival June 20th '96,
all of which I received at the hands of prison
officers. Last Thursday was the worst yet. After
continuously slamming my head against a concrete,
then metal structure, followed by my body against a
concrete floor (the stated purpose being to get me to
fear him), this 300 lb officer then verbalized his
intent to kill me for my not cowering to his will.
Ordinarily the above would be considered attempted
murder. In here it seems to be the norm -- The
inquisition continues. I had tended not to report
these incidents, not wanting to appear as though I'm
whining. I am not. This is only for informational
purposes. It is not uncommon for people to be killed
in these institutions and it be reported as self-
inflicted. In the event of my premature death, I
think it prudent that there be someone independent
who is aware of the preceding.....thus averting such
fabrication.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
The Rev. Chiniquy material (see CN 9.75) really got some people
to howling. One reader was so blinded by fury he erroneously
supposed that Jack Chick, mentioned as a source for obtaining
Chiniquy's book, was the actual author. He wrote in part,
Jack Chick describes convents that never existed, priests
that were never ordained, and public meetings that never
took place. For examples, refer to:
http://www.catholic.com/answers/tracts/whoppers.htm
http://www.catholic.com/answers/tracts/anticath.htm
(Note that I haven't yet verified the above web sites as still
operating.)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Finally, news is a funny business: some days slow, some days
busy. When it's slow, I like to go to the University of Illinois
library and dig for items there. Right now, though, it's
end-of-semester madness at U of I. So, for the moment, U of I as
a resource is more or less extremely occupied with harried
students rushing to finish papers. That means resources are not
as easily available as normally.
What this means is, a "dry spell" may occur with CN for the
next few weeks; less to report for awhile. But, when the news
breaks out, Conspiracy Nation breaks in.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

183
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-78.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 78
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
P O T P O U R R I
=================
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
This past week (Dec. 1-7, 1996) we heard that "experts" are
deciding that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) is too high and
should be lowered by about 1 percent. One effect of this CPI
lowering will be a decrease in Social Security payments. Local
radio program "News From Neptune" points out another aspect in
this, that this lowering of the CPI will enable other "experts"
to "prove" that "the economy is good."
In the latest issue of the monthly, hardcopy Conspiracy
Nation newsletter, mention is made of Adolph Hitler's "Big Lie"
technique. In that issue I suggest one of the current "big lies"
is that "the economy is good." With a lowering of the CPI, this
falsehood is enabled to be propped up: "proof" is now
forthcoming that, regarding today's workers, "no, it turns out
that they don't have to work longer than their parents to achieve
the same standard of living after all; see, here's 'proof' based
on the lowered CPI."
Look for "experts" to appear in the future "proving" that
"the economy is good" based on wooden-leg CPI figures.
The newsfakers argued this past week that, for example,
people are not buying new cars as often and therefore high prices
for new cars are not what they seem. Yet this is a "chicken or
egg" argument (a la "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?"):
people don't buy new cars as often because they can't afford the
new cars! It's not like it's some new chic lifestyle choice to
drive the same car past 100,000 miles.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
In CN 9.77, mention was made of the enfuriated reader who
believed that the Rev. Chiniquy and Jack Chick were actually the
same person. Responding to my scoffing, the enfuriated reader
responded:
Oh yeah? Then who is this Chiniquy guy? Why does Chick
hold the copyright on Chiniquy's book? How can Chick hold
the copyright on a book that he didn't write?
Chiniquy<-->Chick: can you say "pseudonym?" Care to put
your money where your mouth is with a little wager? How
about 25 bucks, donated to the winner's favorite charity,
that the book WAS written by Chick. Game?
(Enfuriated Reader)
As it turns out, I should have taken "ER" (Enfuriated Reader) up
on the proposed wager. For I now have in my possession an
ancient, mouldering book (the kind whose pages you must turn
carefully, lest they crumble), entitled *Fifty Years in the
Church of Rome* by Rev. Charles Chiniquy, St. Anne, Kankakee
County, Illinois. The copyright is from the year 1886. I have
photocopied the relevant pages, and am prepared to send said
copies to "ER", should he still wish to wager on the matter.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Say good-bye to "dry spells"; I have a copy of the
Congressional Record from 1910, from which I ought to be able to
extract items of interest to conspiratologists. Here is one:
Congressional Record, House, Jan. 26, 1910, p. 1043.
[Regarding HR 13410, Mr. Hull of Iowa states] Mr. Speaker,
this only changes the present law to conform to the recent
laws as to the militia and volunteers. When the Articles
of War were adopted by the Congress, the militia included
all able-bodied males between the ages of 18 and 45. Now
we have a law organizing what is called the "organized
militia" or "national guard." This bill puts in before the
word "militia" the word "organized." In addition to that
it recognizes what our volunteer law recognizes as a third
line, called the "volunteers" and it simply adds the words
"or volunteers"...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
(Partial transcript of an interview of Don Freed, author of
Killing Time, a new book about the O.J. Simpson case. Freed is
interviewed by Sherman H. Skolnick.)
DON FREED: Killing Time is a study made by a group of
researchers, and published by MacMillan, which attempts to
substitute an idiom or an alphabet of forensic timelines -- of
facts -- in place of the temper tantrum of race and rage which
greeted the jury verdict.
We first create a timeline. And we ask the question, and the
reader is in the place of the juror. And you follow the
blood-red footprints into the murder killing time -- into the
timeline. And if you find that Simpson could not be in that
killing time, that there is "something wrong" (in Dr. Henry Lee's
words), then you have no choice but to look at other
possibilities, other scenarios.
SHERMAN SKOLNICK: What other scenario, for example?
DON FREED: For example, organized drugs and vice in the wealthy
west side of Los Angeles.
SHERMAN SKOLNICK: Which are known to the authorities, and were
known to Judge Lance Ito through his police captain wife,
Margaret York, who was in charge of internal investigations in
the L.A. police.
DON FREED: That is true. And one of the first reports linking
the killings in Brentwood to other murders in the same lifestyle
circle -- cocaine -- was the Chicago reports from your
headquarters. [Mr. Skolnick chairs the Citizens' Committee to
Clean Up the Courts, in Chicago.]
SHERMAN SKOLNICK: In other words, is it possible that what they
claim is his special footprint there, in the blood, that he could
have come on the scene after the crime was committed?
DON FREED: That's one of the possibilities. And we have about a
half a dozen options for the reader and the juror to follow.
SHERMAN SKOLNICK: Do you raise that question, that he could have
come on the scene after the murder?
DON FREED: Yes, we do. On the scene before, or during, or after.
SHERMAN SKOLNICK: But not having committed it [the murder(s)].
DON FREED: That is right. And we also pose the question that,
since we do not know who the killer was, we do not know who the
target was. And that could be Mr. Goldman, it could be Ms.
Simpson, it could have been Ms. Resnick, the house guest, or it
could have been O.J. Simpson himself.
I think you have been on the right track from the beginning.
I think we're looking at a corner of the canvas of big-time
sports and sports gambling, which involves big-time narcotics.
SHERMAN SKOLNICK: The public has to know that in the early '70s,
you helped edit a book on the corruption and dirty business of
the L.A. Police intelligence, called The Glass-House Tapes. What
do you make of the judge's police captain wife, who was liaison
to DEA, to Drug Enforcement?
DON FREED: That's right. And that is why, I think, neither the
prosecution, the defense, nor the judge, wanted to get anywhere
near drugs.
SHERMAN SKOLNICK: But the point is that you believe that many of
those involved in the trial knew what was really involved.
DON FREED: Well I think so, including some of the lawyers and
investigators!
SHERMAN SKOLNICK: What do you make of one of the victim's
father, Fred Goldman? That's screaming all the time?
DON FREED: He interrupted me on "Larry King Live" [Cable news
program] with a furious monologue. And I told him that I
understood his position but that he had no monopoly on justice,
and that we have to start from scratch. And the fact that his
son may have been the target in no way justifies his murder.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

264
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-79.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 79
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CHARLES S. HAYES CONSTITUTIONAL NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT
=======================================================
In CN 9.59 was posted info from a source "known to me not to be a
lightweight." The following communique comes from that same
source. I don't know whether I'm free to reveal his name. I can
give some insight on him by pointing to a video of a lecture
given by retired NYPD vice squad detective James Rothstein: in
that tape, Rothstein mentions that, on his way to Oklahoma City
to privately investigate the Murrah Building bombings, he stopped
in a certain city to pick up this person and bring him along.
Here is the latest info, received today, 12/7/96, from the
un-named source, henceforth (for future reference) given the code
name "Mr. Boderby."
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
THREE OPTIONS WERE PRESENTED TO BOY BILL, in order to accomplish
his departure, owing to Boy Bill [Clinton] using 5+ lines of coke
per day.
These options, among others, were detailed to Boy Bill by Robert
Strauss (in an ashtray smashing meeting with Boy Bill) and by
Chuck Hayes in a more recent, more calm, meeting with Boy Bill at
a small airport in Kentucky.
First Option
------------
1. Easiest and best for Boy Bill: let wife be scandalized
(Whitewater indicted) as indirect, non-personal reason for
stepping down.
Second Option
-------------
2. Direct personal emergency 25th Amendment bi-partisan and
medical committee declaration of presidential unfitness owing to
5+ lines of personal cocaine use per day by Boy Bill.
Third Option
------------
3. Direct personal responsibility for *Mena*, Arkansas massive
cocaine drug importation and nationwide distribution during
governorship and continuing into presidency.
Detailed data of option 1 and general data concerning options 2
and 3 (thru the first week of 96 *December*) follow:
I.
--
Option 1 was chosen owing to a desire to not too obviously
duplicate still-remembered USA history.
Sufficient world powers agreed to eliminate Kennedy, therefore he
was assassinated; however it was too recently done to assassinate
Nixon, therefore it was agreed for Nixon to be directly
personally scandalized out of office (Watergate). Nixon was too
recent to directly personally scandalize Boy Bill, therefore
certain powers agreed to eliminate Boy Bill by indirect family
(wife) scandalization. The scandal being in major part financial
crimes (Whitewater).
The counter-strike, possibly death knell, to this Option 1 is the
96/Dec/3 decision to let convicted felon Charles Keating go scott
free on all convictions for all financial crimes. The Keating
federal and state financial crimes jury convictions were the
model, plan, precedent for wife's [Hillary's] planned financial
crimes indictment and intended jury conviction if necessary.
However, the following White House counter-strike has intervened
into planned Option 1:
1(a). 96/April, J. Reno Dept. of Injustice sudden decision to
drop all lesser charges still pending as to Keating financial
crimes.
1(b). 96/April, J. Reno Dept. of Injustice sudden urgent need
for a marathon 7-hour (183 pages) deposition of Chuck Hayes on a
case well over 10 years old (Inslaw). (There is a saying in the
covert world: set the trap; then, *wait 6 months!*)
Note Dates:
-----------
(1) 96/Oct/3 (6 months later), Bond allowed for convicted felon
Keating (on all state and federal convictions).
(2) 96/Oct/3, Bond allowed "*in* *advance*" of any decision.
(3) 96/Oct/9, Signed but not made public, grand jury indictments
of wife [Hillary] suddenly called back for urgent re-wording and
re-signing; the Fifth Column's only public figure, Chuck Hayes,
involved in writing/re-writing wife indictments.
(4) Whether the re-writing and re-signing allegedly completed by
96/Oct/18 ever will be made public or will be forever suppressed
owing to the amazing co-incidental timing of the incredibly
corrupt Keating 96/Oct/3 bond and 96/Dec/3 decision made up from
reasoning scraped off the floor of a horse barn remains to be
seen.
(5) 96/Oct/22, Chuck Hayes swooped on, false arrested, by
unchartered FBI SWAT team.
(6) 96/Oct/22, "No bond" written into false arrest warrant for an
alleged "*attempt*" to do something that never happened -- before
any bond hearing. Remarkably, Keating with multiple felony jury
convictions for crimes fully perpetrated in separate state and
federal courts was given bond on 96/Oct/3 with no hearing
decision.
(7) 96/Oct/25, Hayes kangaroo alleged hearing -- "No bond"
allowed.
(8) 96/Oct/28, Wildly inaccurate "Hayes" alleged court findings
by J.B. Johnson magistrate judge issued, based on 96/Oct/25
kangaroo hearing -- "No bond" is the order!!!
(9) 96/Nov/22, Magistrate Judge J.B. Johnson motion hearing --
"No bond" repeated, but bond matter referred in open court in
front of 50+ witnesses to federal Judge Barbara Coffman for full
hearing. Ironically, this is the very day Bob Strauss sponsored
and hosted leading Communist Russian General Aleksandr Lebed on
Lebed's first trip to the USA.
(10) 96/Nov/26, Barbara Coffman orders corrections in 96/Oct/28
alleged findings owing to gross errors but "*without hearing*" on
specific issue of bond. Barbara Coffman went out of her way to
announce, apparently on orders from "above," that she is in
lockstep -- "No bond" -- and further, "no bond" hearing would be
allowed to commence despite 96 hours earlier J.B. Johnson had
announced in front of 50 witnesses that a bond hearing would be
commenced in front of Barbara Coffman upon motion of Chuck Hayes,
which motion was filed on 96/Nov/22 for 96/Nov/26 hearing, but
immediately denied out of hand without hearing by Barbara Coffman
on 96/Nov/26.
(11a) 96/Dec/3, Keating set free; decision based on alleged "jury
contamination." That is, that the Keating scandal was so well
known and so well publicized that the jurors had heard of the
matter in advance of the trial (hearing of the matter somehow
equals "contaminated"), therefore, each and every conviction in
separate state and federal courts was thereby overturned by one
lower-level federal judge, Marianne Pfeizer, in one all-inclusive
mysterious decision.
Most probably any and every juror could be claimed to be
contaminated because it could be claimed that any person has
heard of Keating and/or financial crimes such as Whitewater.
Under this corrupt false decision, wife [Hillary] could never
be tried by any USA juror because any and every adult in our USA
could be claimed to have heard of wife and Whitewater.
(11b) 96/Dec/2 had been date pre-set at the time of false arrest
to commence Chuck Hayes' jury trial on a false arrest in the last
week of Oct. (with no discovery and the alleged criminal charge
itself not provided to the false arrest victim for over five
weeks after arrest.)
(12) Much of Chuck Hayes' efforts and the Fifth Column's perilous
and life-threatening labors of many months have now been reduced
to ashes by one more female federal black-robed Hillary covencat,
Marianne Pfeizer, spellcasting onto the men of the Fifth Column:
"Ashes, ashes, all fall down!!"
II.
---
With regard to Option 2, amazingly coincidental with the timing
of the Option 1 defensive White House counter-strike corrupt
Keating court decision is that the very same day (96/Dec/3),
Fifth Column offensive Option 2 was put into play on nationwide
radio, print, lengthy focused coverage by major TV, on Dr.
O'Toole and the bi-partisan joint medical committee set up in the
recent past to deal with a potential emergency 25th Amendment
problem during the Nixon administration and how the same
emergency mechanism is now in place during this Boy Bill current
administration.
Unblessedly, a counter-measure to a 25th Amendment emergency
bi-partisan joint medical committee is an even greater war power
emergency such as a plague, natural disaster, military action
inside or outside USA, triggering a martial law declaration.
III.
----
The counter-measure being put into play to the #3 "*Mena*" option
is a re-hearing of the Noriega appeal and a re-trial, with the
plan being that coverage of that situation focusing on the
Bush/Ollie crack cocaine (San Jose Mercury) epidemic would dwarf
any Mena exposure.
Another recent remarkable "*Mena*" co-incidence as to Noriega and
Option 3, for over 200 years every foreign extradition type of
case was held in D.C. federal circuit. The Noriega case was held
in the Janet Reno origin and controlled Miami court, also the
jurisdiction of Homestead Air Force base (Florida), where USA
pentagramagon joint chief's boss, Communist General
Shalikashvilli's underling Air Force generals (such as General
Cherry, now in Kentucky) and Jeb Bush met the dope-laden USA Air
Force planes coming in from Panama.
With the unconstitutional and improper Reno Dept. of
Injustice-arranged Florida venue Noriega trial, one might expect
an improper Florida appeal, or if any effort at a false
appearance of proper procedure were made, one might expect a D.C.
appeal.
Under our current Dept. of Injustice, however, the case was
recently assigned to the fixed venue that corruptly covered up
the $5 billion agricultural credits from George Bush to Clayton
Yeuter (US Dept. of Ag.) to BNL (Banco Nacional de Lavoro, Italy)
to Matrix Churchill (London) to weapons for Saddam Hussein used
to kill Americans and Arabs in the Gulf War. The BNL case, that
was only recently completed with records hidden, is known as the
BNL/Atlanta case owing to the BNL/Atlanta branch being used in
part to transfer $5 billion in Agricultural credits into arms for
our USA pentagramagon imposter usurper generals, admirals, and
other merchants of death.
It is to this same internationally corrupt fixed venue, Atlanta,
that the Noriega re-hearing, without any constitutional reason in
fact or law, has been recently mysteriously assigned.
A gory irony to all of these machinations is that the chief
beneficiaries of an upcoming absent Boy Bill are the
principalities and powers behind Shalikashvilli, Lebed, Armand
Hammer and Sickle, Bob Strauss, and their chief anti-Christ
Communist asset in place, Al Gore.
Our Father in Heaven, to whom we prayed this Thanksgiving in
order to give thanks for our great nation, needs to hear our
continuing prayers until our nation is safe from *enemies* both
foreign and *DOMESTIC*.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

121
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-80.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 80
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
THE BIBLE AND THE PRIEST OF ROME
================================
(Excerpts from ch. 1 of *Fifty Years in the Church of Rome* by
Rev. Charles Chiniquy. New York: Fleming H. Revell Company, 1886)
My father, Charles Chiniquy, born in Quebec, had studied in the
Theological Seminary of that city, to prepare himself for the
priesthood. But a few days before making his vows, having been
the witness of a great iniquity in the high quarters of the
church, he changed his mind, studied law and became a notary.
Married to Reine Perrault, daughter of Mitchel Perrault, in 1808
he settled at first in Kamoraska, where I was born on the 30th
July, 1809.
Before leaving the Seminary of Quebec my father had received from
one of the Superiors a token of his esteem, a beautiful French
and Latin Bible.
On one of the beautiful spring days of 1818, my father was
writing in his office, and my mother was working with her needle,
singing one of her favorite hymns, and I was at the door, playing
and talking to a fine robin which I had so perfectly trained that
he followed me wherever I went. All of a sudden I saw the priest
coming near the gate. The sight of him sent a thrill of
uneasiness through my whole frame. It was his first visit to our
home.
The priest was a person below the common stature, and had an
unpleasant appearance -- his shoulders were large and he was very
corpulent; his hair was long and uncombed, and his double chin
seemed to groan under the weight of his flabby cheeks.
That priest [Rev. Courtois] was born in France, where he had a
narrow escape, having been condemned to death under the bloody
administration of Robespierre.
His conversation was animated and interesting for the first
quarter of an hour. But of a sudden his countenance changed as
if a dark cloud had come over his mind, and he stopped talking.
The silence which followed was exceedingly unpleasant for all
parties. It looked like the heavy hour which precedes a storm.
At length the priest, addressing my father, said, "Mr. Chiniquy,
is it true that you and your child read the Bible?"
"Yes, sir," was the quick reply, "my little boy and I read the
Bible, and what is still better, he has learned by heart a great
number of its most interesting chapters."
"But do you not know that you are forbidden by the holy Council
of Trent to read the Bible in French?"
"It makes little difference to me whether I read the Bible in
French, Greek or Latin," answered my father, "for I understand
these languages equally well."
"But are you ignorant of the fact that you cannot allow your
child to read the Bible?" replied the priest.
"My wife directs her own child in the reading of the Bible, and I
cannot see that we commit any sin by continuing to do in future
what we have done till now in that maatter."
"Mr. Chiniquy," rejoined the priest, "you have gone through a
whole course of theology; you know the duties of a curate; you
know it is my painful duty to come here, get the Bible from you
and burn it."
I feared lest some very unfortunate and violent scene should
occur; for my father's anger at that moment was really terrible.
But there was another thing which affected me. I feared lest the
priest should lay his hands on my dear Bible, which was just
before him on the table.
At last, after having paced the room for a considerable time, my
father suddenly stopped before the priest, and said, "Sir, is
that all you have to say here?"
"Yes, sir," said the trembling priest.
"Well, sir," added my father, "you know the door by which you
entered the house; please take the same door and go away
quickly."
The priest went out immediately. I felt an inexpressible joy
when I saw that my Bible was safe. I ran to my father's neck,
kissed and thanked him for his victory.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

97
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-81.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 81
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
COVERT COMMENTS FROM WASHINGTON INSIDER
=======================================
Letter to Editor, From Latest "Rumor Mill News"
-----------------------------------------------
(PO Box 1784, Aptos, CA 95001-1784 -- $5 per issue)
Just saw your October Rumor Mill. I'd love to subscribe, but I'm
never in one place long enough. Fortunately there's lots of
copies of it floating around the Pentagon and Langley. If you
had a dollar for all the ones I've seen, you'd be rich.
Just thought you'd like to know that the subcommittees are
working overtime in order to nail Clinton. He has more problems
staring him in the face than Bush ever thought of. The enemies
that Clinton has made on the "Hill" are the meanest people in the
whole world!
He didn't join the Rogues, as you speculated. He submitted fully
to Faction II [see CN 9.74], my guys. You were pretty good in
your analysis of the whole thing. If I didn't know better about
you, I would say you were trained at Langley. But then again, if
you were trained by your husband, you were trained at Langley...
But you were wrong about the dates. The actual power shift took
place November 8th. Not on the weekend before the election. The
deal went down at 8AM on Friday the 8th of November. Up until
that time, there had been a full sanction against him [Clinton]
by the Company.
He has saved his hide and through it, has prolonged his job
period by 4-5 months. It doesn't stop the investigations running
against him.
Hillary will be formally indicted before the new government is
sworn in. Just wait until James Carville leaps onto the scene
trying to discredit Kenneth Starr. It's going to be the best
show we've seen in years.
Lord only knows the compromises that Clinton is going to have to
make to save his wife from prosecution... and if he doesn't save
her, she will sink him. I have the feeling that he will have to
turn the powers of his Veto over to our people. You now have a
man in the White House who has no power whatsoever. It won't
help the Republicans, in the House or the Senate, but it will
make Faction II more than a mere "off the shelf" type of
operation.
Thank God that he made the deal! Operation Mount Rushmore (as in
dead presidents) had been called for and was about to be put into
deed. It won't change the end effect one bit. Clinton will step
down before May 31st. Al Gore is aware of it, as he is the one
who suggested to Clinton to take the offer before it was too late
for an alternative. Tipper will have a ball redecorating the
White House!
Everyone on the Hill (who has any real say so) knows that Clinton
cut the deal. This will take one hell of a lot of pressure off
the Navy. The word Tailhook will soon die. The thing that
finally tipped the scales was that Internet story about the Navy
shooting down TWA800. We saw the handwriting on the wall and
knew that if we didn't come together and move, Tailhook Part
Two... as you so aptly put it... would destroy everyone who might
be able to stop him.
WDC Insider
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

145
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-82.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 82
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SHERMAN SKOLNICK'S RECORDED MESSAGE
===================================
(December 9, 1996; Transcription by Conspiracy Nation)
------------------------------------------------------
Hi! Sherman Skolnick, Citizens' Committee to Clean Up the
Courts, 9800 South Oglesby.
The major court corruption is in the Federal Appeals Court, in
major cities, like Chicago. The undisputed court record shows it
is day; the crooked panel of Appeals Court judges says it is
night, and they make a crooked ruling favoring a bank or large
corporate interest.
Hearing a lot of this are key federal appeals judges in Chicago:
Chief Judge Richard A. Posner (office, 312-435-5806) and his
sidekick, Judge Frank H. Easterbrook (312-435-5808) -- both, once
law professors at Rockefeller's University of Chicago. Posner, a
judge, continues to reportedly represent that university's
billion dollar stock portfolio fund. Posner and Easterbrook
promote an unusual theory of law, called "Economic Efficiency."
That is, an underdog should not be allowed, in court, to prevail
in discrimination and other damage suits against multi-national
pirates. It hurts profits!
These two judges, and their gang, issue rulings falsifying the
facts. Such as in a big bucks anti-Trust case against Western
Union. Some lawyers were nearly destroyed when they blew the
whistle.
In 1991, I was the only journalist at an Appeals Court hearing
involving the records of the Chicago branch of Italy's largest
bank: Banca Nazionale del Lavoro [BNL], owned in part by the
Pope. Afterwards, I interviewed two participants who confirmed
that secret records showed George Bush, then President, was the
private business partner of Saddam Hussein, the Iraqi strongman.
They showed billions of dollars of oil kick-backs from the
militarily-weak producers in the Persian Gulf. It could have
been the largest tax-evasion case in U.S. history -- against
George Bush!
Before his later ruling, the Bush Justice Department leaked out
details that Judge Posner had taken bribes in 8 other cases.
(Being on the ball, we already knew about that.) Once
blackmailed, Judge Posner ruled the BNL case should be removed
from the courthouse. Only one smaller newspaper ran my exclusive
story.
Before becoming a judge, Posner ran a litigation services firm.
In plain language, he was a bagman and a fixer. He was also
chief anti-Trust consultant to CBS. Then, as judge, he refused
to disqualify himself in an important anti-Trust case involving
CBS. Hey! Guess who won!?
In the early 1970s, our work led to the jailing, for bribery, of
Posner's predecessor, Chicago federal appeals judge Otto Kerner,
Jr. Since forming this group in 1963, I have been falsely jailed
for contempt, wheelchair and all, by corrupt judges who I
directly accused of bribery. Judge Easterbrook, at the behest of
his crony, Chief Judge Posner, are ordering me and an associate
of mine to be barred from their court, the U.S. Court of Appeals,
7th Circuit, Chicago. It revolves around our case, where a
Mafia-linked sheriff, at gunpoint, stopped our on-location cable
TV production. We were making a video of the sheriff's people
breaking into my associate's (Joseph Andreuccetti) home and
stealing our cable TV tapes and documents relating to federal
court corruption.
From what is happening, it appears that this gang of crooked
federal judges and bankers is preparing to falsely jail us for
contempt. Public outcry can stop them.
If you know about other examples of corruption of Judges Posner
and Easterbrook and their mob, write to the Citizens Committee to
Clean Up the Courts, 9800 South Oglesby Ave., Chicago, IL 60617.
(Phone: 312-375-5741)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Mr. Skolnick, since 1963, has been founder/chairman of a
public-interest group, CITIZENS' COMMITTEE TO CLEAN UP THE
COURTS, researching and disclosing certain instances of judicial
corruption and political murders. Since 1971, as editor of
updates of the group's work, called HOTLINE NEWS, a 5-minute
recorded phone message, changed several times per week -- a
regular phone call -- (312) 731-1100. (Area code may soon change
to 773.) Since 1991, a regular participant, now moderator, of a
popular, public access cable TV program, called "Broadsides", in
Chicago and suburbs -- on most every Monday evening in Chicago,
on Channel 21 cable, 9 p.m., available to some 400,000
households. His comments appear on Internet on several websites;
archives of his stories can be pulled up and printed out. Also,
on Internet, his stories appear on some five categories of news
groups, such as alt.conspiracy and alt.activism. (See also
http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html and see also ftp.shout.net
pub/users/bigred) Office (8 a.m. to midnight, 7 days): (312)
375-5741. 9800 So. Oglesby Avenue, Chicago, IL 60617-4870. Call
before sending FAX. NOTE THAT THE NEW AREA CODE, 773, WAS TO
HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED BY NOW. IF 312 AREA CODE FAILS, TRY AREA
CODE 773. (After October 12, 1996, AREA CODE changes to 773.)
A few highlights of the group's work: Caused the biggest bribery
scandal in U.S. history, the collapse of the Illinois Supreme
Court, 1969. Investigation of the sabotaged Watergate plane
crash, 1972-73. 12 Watergate figures perished including Mrs. E.
Howard Hunt, wife of the Watergate burglar. One of the first to
comment on the Vice President Spiro Agnew bribery mess, resulting
in his downfall, 1973. Investigation and disclosure causing the
jailing for bribery of the highest level sitting federal judge in
American history, Chicago Federal Appeals Judge Otto Kerner, Jr.,
1973. Touching off "Operation Greylord," in which 20 local
judges and 40 lawyers jailed for bribery, 1983-1993.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

101
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-83.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 83
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
GEORGE BUSH COURTS SUN MOON
===========================
Letter to Editor, From Latest "Rumor Mill News"
-----------------------------------------------
(PO Box 1784, Aptos, CA 95001-1784 -- $5 per issue)
Dear Rumor Mill News,
You have mentioned the Moonies and mind control more than
once. If they are such a bad church then why is George Bush
giving so much of his time to them?
Tall Tess from Texas
Dear T-3,
Thank you for asking this question. I had clipped out an
article and was going to write about it this month, but I forgot
about it until your note.
Sun-Moon was financed originally by the Rockefeller
Foundation. It has always been my belief that Sun-Moon is being
set up to be the Messiah of the New World [Order] Religion.
A few months ago, George Bush traveled to Korea to attend a
function hosted by the wife of Sun-Moon. Many say that she is
being positioned to take his place when he passes into God-hood.
I don't know how much money George Bush was paid to attend the
meeting. I also don't know how much Bush was paid to fly to
Buenos Aires over the weekend of November 23-24, but he was the
guest speaker at a banquet late Saturday to launch Moon's new
publication called the Times of the World.
Bush then traveled with Moon to neighboring Uruguay where
4,200 young Japanese women are being initiated into the
Unification Church to spread the word across Latin America.
As you know from reading the lead article in this month's
RMNews, a new war is looming in the Korean Peninsula. If it is
allowed to start, I don't expect it to be over for 2-3 years. It
is my belief that the war has been planned for many years. I
expect that Sun-Moon will play a major role in stopping the war,
and maybe even become a POW in North Korea for awhile.
If he is killed, i.e. "crucified" for his beliefs, the North
Koreans will be playing right into the hands of the New World
Order slave masters.
Recently there has been heavy UFO activity sited over Korea.
I believe the Koreans are being prepared to be confronted with
"Operation Blue Beam." Blue Beam is a plan to create a
holographic image of the new Messiah in the sky. The new Messiah
will probably be accompanied by Jesus, Buddha, Krisna, Mohammed
and a whole pantheon of great saints and spiritual leaders from
all the religions. If the North Koreans have killed and martyred
Sun-Moon, then Sun-Moon's image will also be projected as part of
the holograms.
The New World [Order] Religion is supposed to be a balance of
the yin and yang, the female and the male. This is why Sun-Moon
is so named. The Sun represents the male energy, the Moon
represents the female energy. Supposedly the church will blend
the male and female energy, and this is why the widow of the
martyred founder will so easily be chosen as his successor.
In other words, the religion is not a patriarchy, it is a
balanced religion... at least that is the picture they want you
to believe. In reality, the religion is a slave religion. To
become a member of it you truly have to sell your soul and your
individual liberty and freedom. You are worn down by an
exhausting work schedule and bombarded constantly with the
propaganda of the church, until you become a programmed zombie.
It is one of the longest running, largest and most effective
mind control operations that has ever been launched by the New
World Order. The only one that equals it is the one that is
still partly on the drawing boards. This is the Wackenhut prison
operation (in Texas) for turning prisoners into Robo-Cops... the
police force of the New World Order.
RMNews
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

118
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-84.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 84
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MAJOR HEBERT TESTIFIES ON GULF WAR SYNDROME
===========================================
"News" Networks (Except ABC) Close Their Eyes
---------------------------------------------
C-Span carried testimony by an Army major, a Marine major, and a
Marine sergeant today who all appeared before a Congressional
subcommittee looking into Gulf War Syndrome.
Especially moving testimony was given by U.S. Marine Major Randy
Hebert. Major Hebert, a Gulf War veteran, developed "Lou
Gehrig's Disease" subsequent to that conflict, and now is unable
to speak clearly; his wife appeared with him to help clarify what
he had to say.
Hebert, much diminished from the virile Marine cheered on to war
by major media Gulf War propagandizing, was today ignored by that
same media. Only ABC News carried portions of his testimony as
their lead story; overinflated Jim Lehrer Newshour on PBS carried
*nothing* on the story. (Remember that when PBS comes whining to
you that they need money.)
This editor was brought to tears by Hebert's testimony. There
sat a man, once the image of strength and hope, now physically
ruined yet still offering his all to help his country get at the
truth. In closing remarks, Hebert noted that he had taken an
oath to defend the U.S. against all enemies, foreign and
domestic. And, he added, some of these enemies are currently
within the government itself, "unfortunately."
Pacifica radio gave in-depth coverage to the story. Here are
excerpts from their broadcast of December 10, 1996:
Up on Capitol Hill, Gulf War veterans told of their own
experience with the deadly agents.
Marine Corps Major Randy Hebert struggled as he tried to
testify before a Congressional subcommittee. His problems
began even before he left the Gulf, experiencing flu-like
symptoms, headaches, depression. Eventually, he says, he
developed what is known as "Lou Gehrig's Disease." As his
troops moved across the battlefield, Hebert says his
soldiers were ordered to put on their protective gear for
chemical weapons. His father reads Hebert's statement:
"As we approached, we received the signal for chemical
attack. We put on our masks and gloves. In doing so, I
recall my right hand feeling cool and tingling."
Two other American soldiers also gave their own accounts of
encounters with chemical agents during the war. All
indicated that their superiors were aware of what they had
encountered.
Indiana Republican Steve Boulier(sp?) expressed frustration
at the slowness of the Pentagon to admit any chemical
exposure: "The powers-that-be in the Pentagon are not
accepting the word of these men. And that is very
bothersome. They keep saying, 'There is no evidence.
There is no evidence.' ... Yet when we have soldiers that
give oral testimony, have logs... [the Pentagon is] still
stonewalling."
In the 1970s, researchers found soldiers suffering from
exposure [to chemical agents] at the Rocky Mount Arsenal,
near Denver. The Army kept stores of nerve gas and other
chemical weapons. But the study was dismissed by a new
[later] Presidential Panel, which relied on other reports
indicating there was no connection between Gulf War
Syndrome and the chemical agents.
Dr. Frank Duff, with the Harvard Medical School, was one of
the researchers at the Rocky Mount Arsenal: "The
committee, had they come out with the conclusion that it
was a reasonable possibility, would have opened the door
for lots of soldiers claiming a service-related disability.
And this would be very costly. So it's the kind of
decision that a committee would make with great care. And
I think that they put a spin on the report in the direction
of casting doubt."
The three Gulf War veterans who testified today were asked
whether they thought the Pentagon was still hiding information.
All three were unanimous in stating that more facts would come to
light regarding Gulf War Syndrome.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

124
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-85.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 85
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CATHOLICS ON RAMPAGE!
=====================
"Rally 'Round the Pope!"
------------------------
In Spanish, "el papa" means "the Pope"; "la papa" means "the
potato." This is why I call the Pope, "the Potato."
Alarmed at recent information about the Catholic church published
by Conspiracy Nation, will the Potato soon visit our shores?
Will he bring his special Potato-car with him? At any rate, some
of his loyal followers aren't wasting time. I have been deluged
by e-mail from angry Catholics who demand that I stop what they
call "Catholic bashing." Some have even frightened this editor
by their threat to cancel their e-mail subscriptions. Yet, in
spite of my trepidation, I delve more into this area.
In *Foreign Conspiracy Against the Liberties of the United
States*, author Samuel F.B. Morse (acknowledged inventor of the
telegraph) writes that "Popery is now, what it has ever been, a
system of the darkest *political* intrigue and despotism,
cloaking itself to avoid attack under the sacred name of
religion."
This does not mean there are not good people sheltering
underneath the Vatican octopus. (But wouldn't these be good
people irrelevant of the cabal which claims them?) Yet the
subject of "Deep Catholicism" (to borrow from Peter Dale Scott's
concept of "deep/esoteric politics") is a proper subject for
investigation by Conspiracy Nation. The renowned conspiracy
research organization, A-albionic, has had as their logo that
"The Overt and Covert Organs of the Vatican and British Empires
are Locked in Mortal Combat for Control of the World."
What's the plot? (Quid coniuratio est?) Morse writes that "The
Pope, the supreme Head of the Catholic church, claims to be
'Viceregent of God,' 'supreme over all mortals;' 'over all
Emperors, Kings, Princes, Potentates and People;' 'King of kings
and Lord of lords.'" The Potato has at his command an enormous
intelligence network; his priests are his eyes and ears
throughout the world. "Consider, too, the power which these
Jesuits and other Catholic priests possess through *the*
*confessional*, of knowing the private characters and affairs of
all the leading men in the community..."
Morse explores the Catholic church's use of "glory giving
titles:"
One of the plainest doctrines of American Republicanism,
which is essentially democratic, is, that mere glory-giving
titles, or titles of servility, are entirely opposed to its
whole spirit. They are considered as one of those
artificial means of kingcraft by which it fosters that
aristocratic, unholy pride in the human heart, which loves
to domineer over its fellow-man, which loves artificial
distinction of ranks, a privileged class, and of course
which helps to sustain that whole system of regal and papal
usurpation which has so long cursed mankind... Bishop
Fenwick, a Catholic priest, is "*his* *Grace* *of*
*Cincinnati*..." another priest is only "*his*
*Reverence*," and Bishop Flaget, and all the other Bishops,
are simple *Monseigneurs*, this title in a foreign language
being less harsh at present to republican ears than its
plump, aristocratic English translation, "*My* *Lord*
*Bishop* of *New-York*," "*My* *Lord* *Bishop* of
*Boston*," "*My* *Lord* *Bishop* of *Charleston*," etc. As
we improve, however, under Catholic instruction, we may
come to be quite reconciled even to *his* *Eminence*
*Cardinal*, so and so, and to all the other graduated
fooleries, which are so well adapted to dazzle the
ignorant.
What is the source of the constant, noxious, anti-semitic
postings to, for example, newsgroups such as "alt.conspiracy?"
On the surface the authors seem to be free-floating morons, but
is there a more cunning force behind them? Immediate speculation
is that it must be CIA engaged in "dirty tricks" meant to tar the
reputation of conspiratologists. But what major world power is
it which has a centuries-old history of anti-semitism? The
Vatican. Yes, on the surface the Catholic Church has made
efforts at reconciliation with the Jews. Yet remember what was
said before about "Deep Catholicism." Notably, Ambrose
Evans-Pritchard writes, in a recent article on the anti-Jewish Ku
Klux Klan, that that hateful organization no longer excludes
Catholics.
Conspiracy Nation is an equal opportunity investigator. This
means it will look wherever it pleases. As can be expected, the
searchlight falls even on some who will howl, "Turn off that
light!" When that happens, we turn up the light even more.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

133
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-86.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 86
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
KNIGHTS OF MALTA
================
(Source for the following is an article from Covert Action,
Winter 1986, "The Sovereign Military Order of Malta," by
Francoise Hervet.)
"Already in existence at the time of the first Crusade in 1099,
in 1113 the Order of St. John was given its independence by Pope
Pascal II, permitted to elect its own Grand Master, and soon the
Order began military participation in the Crusades along with the
Knights Templar and Teutonic Knights. The Order of St. John
recruited successfully among the European aristocracy and soon
controlled extensive estates throughout the continent,
assimilating those previously belonging to the Knights Templar
which it had helped crush during the first two decades of the
14th century, with the Templar leadership burned alive as
heretics."
The Order was driven from Jerusalem in 1187, fled to Acre,
Cyprus, and finally to Rhodes. At Rhodes they set up a military
dictatorship and for the first time were a sovereign territory.
By 1530 they were driven from Rhodes and moved their headquarters
to Malta. On that island they built a powerful naval force and
fought many naval actions. The Sovereign Military Order of Malta
(SMOM) was a major military force in the Mediterranean until
their defeat by Napoleon in 1789. The Order was given protection
by Russian Emperor Paul I, and by 1834 had moved its headquarters
to Rome with help from Pope Leo XIII.
The American Association of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta
(Knights of Malta, SMOM) was founded in 1927. "By 1941 Francis
Cardinal Spellman was listed as the 'Grand Protector' and
'Spritual Advisor' of the Order, with John J. Raskob as
Treasurer. Members included John Farrell, then President of U.S.
Steel, Joseph P. Grace, and John D. Ryan. In 1934 Raskob,
inspired by the French fascist Croix de Feu, and working closely
with Morgan Bank's John Davis, had been a principal financier in
the plot to organize a fascist coup in the U.S. The plan failed
when General Smedley Butler, who had been set up to lead the
project, denounced it."
His Eminence Cardinal Spellman, "Grand Protector" of the Knights
of Malta, worked with Pope Pius XII to help Nazi war criminals
escape justice. According to Frederic Laurent (*L'Orchestre
Noir. Pairs: Editions Stock, 1978),
All studies [of the post-WWII nazi networks] have shown the
determining role played by the Catholic Church in the
flight of war criminals. Since April 1943, following
negotiations between Pius XII and the ultra reactionary
American archbishop Francis Spellman, the Holy See became
the clandestine center of Anglo-American espionage in
Italy. This collaboration in fact had begun the previous
year... between Earl Brennan, a veteran of the American
State Department and Gian Battista Montini, at the time a
bishop and Under-Secretary of State at the Vatican. This
close collaboration between the future [Pope] Paul VI and
the American secret services continued after the war
through the [CIA] intermediary James Angleton...
When the victorious Americans entered Rome in June of 1944,
chief-General Mark Clark was made a Knight Grand Cross of the
Sovereign Military Order of Malta. On December 27, 1946 James
Angleton received the Croci Al Merito Seconda Classe from the
Knights of Malta. "On November 17, 1948 SMOM awarded one of its
highest honors, the Grand Cross of Merit, to Reinhard Gehlen, the
nazi chief of intelligence on the Soviet front. He was
subsequently installed by the Americans as the first chief of
West Germany's equivalent of the CIA, the
*Bundesnachtrichtdienst* (BND: federal secret service), under
West German Chancellor Adenauer, a devout Catholic who had
received the Magistral Grand Cross personally from SMOM Grand
Master Prince Chigi." In 1956, Clare Booth Luce of the *Time*
magazine empire became a "Dame of Malta." (Clare Booth Luce is
on the board of the Rev. Sun-Moon's Washington Times newspaper.)
Former CIA Director John McCone is shown to be a member of the
Knights of Malta by their 1980 list. (The article by Hervet,
used as the source for this information, has many other
noteworthy persons listed as belonging to the Vatican military
order of SMOM. The article should still be available from
Prevailing Winds Research. I have their phone number as
805-566-8016 or write to PO Box 23511, Santa Barbara, CA 93121.)
"Freemasonry generally purports to be hostile to Catholicism, and
conversely, the Vatican has at various times forbidden Catholics
to join Masonic organizations. Nevertheless, in December of 1969
an exclusive meeting was held in the Rome office of Count Umberto
Ortolani, the Ambassador of the Order of Malta to Uruguay, who
has been called 'the brains' behind the fascist P-2 Masonic
Lodge, which had been established in the mid-1960s. In addition
to Ortolani, the meeting included only Licio Gelli, Roberto
Calvi, and Michele Sindona."
The article from which the above has been taken is several pages
long. Interested readers are referred to that article, "The
Sovereign Military Order of Malta" by Francoise Hervet. (Covert
Action, Winter 1986; or article may be available from Prevailing
Winds, see phone and address listed previously in this issue of
CN.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

129
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-87.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 87
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MYSTERIOUS DEATH OF MYSTERY WRITER BLAMED ON MYSTERY MILITIA
============================================================
"Round Up the Usual Suspects."
------------------------------
A CN reader sent the following item; I'm not sure if it's an AP,
Reuters, or whatever story: Police probe mystery writer's
mysterious death 4:42pm EST, 12/10/96.
CHICAGO - A mystery writer found hanging by a rope outside
his office window may have committed suicide, police said
Tuesday, although friends said he may have been threatened
by militia groups.
Eugene Izzi, 43, who had written a dozen little-known
mysteries including one made into a television movie, was
found Saturday morning hanging by a thick rope outside a
14th floor downtown office building.
The Chicago Sun-Times reported in a front-page story
headlined "Novelist's Hanging a Whodunit" that Izzi's body
was clad in a bullet-proof vest and his pockets contained
notes referring to telephoned threats from militia groups.
The newspaper quoted an unnamed friend as saying
Chicago-born Izzi may have infiltrated a militia group to
research a future novel and run afoul of the group's rules.
"Officially, it's a death investigation," a police
spokesman said. "He's gotten more notoriety in death than
he ever did in life."
The spokesman said bruises on Izzi's face and body may have
come from his lifeless body banging against the building
for a couple of hours before it was found. But police were
looking at computer discs and other material recovered from
Izzi's ransacked office for clues to his death.
Chicago investigator Sherman Skolnick contends that blame for
Izzi's death is being shoved in the direction of the populist
militias, to cover up what is actually a Chicago Police
Department murder squad. Mr. Skolnick, with decades of
experience on such matters, says that there is a group of white
policemen in the Chicago P.D. who routinely murder outspoken
blacks. Izzi, a black author, was, according to Skolnick, an
expert on police corruption, racial matters, and murder squads
and apparently had written a book (said to be due out in April
1997) which may have upset some person or persons. After
discussing the matter with low-level television journalists,
Skolnick discovered that the alleged police murder squad angle to
the story is being killed by higher ups of at least one network.
"Is the FBI leaning on the TV stations?" he wonders.
Some readers may have trouble incorporating the concept of
certain police personnel as murderers. Yet it was not so long
ago in Chicago that a white policeman blatantly shot a black
homeless person in that city. Recall that around the summer of
1995 a white Chicago police officer was leaving a tavern with his
black mistress, when they were approached by a homeless black
man. Some disagreement ensued and the off-duty policeman went to
the trunk of his car, pulled out a pistol, shot the homeless man
point-blank in the face, then calmly drove off with his mistress.
Here is a relevant portion from Mr. Skolnick's latest recorded
message (312-731-1100):
A Chicago-based murder mystery writer, Eugene Izzi, had
uncovered data showing there was a Chicago Police murder
squad that went around killing political activists,
especially blacks. Some of their targets were the lawyers
of litigants in the City Hall [Shackman related] cases. (A
large number of the city workers are blacks.)
On December 7th, 1996, Izzi was found hanging by a rope
from an open window of a 13th-floor office on a main street
of Chicago: North Michigan Avenue. Izzi was wearing a
bullet-resistant vest, brass knuckles in his pocket, and a
can of disabling spray.
To cover up the Chicago Police assassination squad, local
authorities told the pressfakers that faraway militia units
were implicated in the strange apparent murder. *Oh*
*yeah*??
The apparent discrepancy between mention of Izzi's 14th-floor
office vs. 13th-floor office is resolved by the common practice
of not actually labeling the 13th floor as such; i.e., floors are
often numbered 11, 12, then 14, with the 13th floor not actually
named as such.
Some readers may also recall a piece done within the past year or
two on PBS (probably on Frontline), showing victims of torture
which occurred in one Chicago police district. It was claimed
that torture was often used on suspects in that district so as to
obtain "confessions."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

148
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-88.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 88
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
P O T P O U R R I
=================
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Merry Christmas! First allow me to wish the best to all
during this holiday season. I have made many friends through
this effort and I wish you all the best for Christmas and the new
year.
Two things: (1) Drive carefully; some drive a bit crazier
than usual during the holidays. (2) Watch out for Clinton and/or
the government to do something sneaky and rotten just when they
figure you aren't paying attention.
A conspiracy angle on Christmas is Santa, whose name is an
anagram for "Satan." Santa, the material god, opposes the
Christian God at this time of year.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Eugene Izzi, the mystery writer found hanged under mysterious
circumstances (see CN 9.87) was not black, as I erroneously had
reported. The mistake was mine and not Sherman Skolnick's. I
regret the error.
Also, regarding the Izzi story, Sherman Skolnick is anxious to
contact any mystery writers who wish to talk on the subject.
Phone him at 773-375-5741 and tell him that "Brian sent you." If
you are a mystery writer and either live in the Chicago area or
will be there around January, Mr. Skolnick may want you to appear
as a guest on his television program.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
The CPI Fraud (Excerpts from New Federalist, 12/16/96): "A
government panel has just come out to recommend reducing the
calculation of the CPI [Consumer Price Index], declaring that it
has been overvalued by approximately one-third. On the basis of
this admittedly impossible to elaborate calculation, this panel
proposes that all government payrolls and taxes, which are
figured on the basis of a cost-of-living index, be refigured to
presume a lower level of inflation. Right off the bat, this
would cut the income of all pensioners, veterans, and government
workers, while raising income tax brackets for millions more.
And what is the basis for this decision? The professional
economists find it very hard to explain, and, in fact, they
frequently admit these days that "no one" really understands what
causes economic growth, or inflation, or other such mysteries.
One element of the figuring is the alleged increase in quality of
goods produced these days, in such ways as the decreased
pollutants in gasoline! As if that quality, even if it were
there, which it often is not, meant that the product costs any
less, relative to your income.
The reality is, that the whole proposal is a gigantic swindle,
an attempt to steal a little bit from a lot of people, with the
stroke of a pen. They figure the elderly won't scream, nor the
veterans, nor the labor movement. After all, if the economic
"experts" tell you that your living standard has actually been
improving, who are you to argue?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Rev. Sun-Moon Competes With "The Potato." False god Rev.
Sun-Moon, with his flock of worshippers, could pose a challenge
to that man I call "the Potato," i.e. the Pope. Both claim some
sort of divine infallibility and the rush is on to see which can
gather more revenue-enhancers into their organization.
Ties between ex-President George Bush and the "Moonies" were
examined in the Dec. 2, 1996 issue of "Si," a Peruvian
newsmagazine, as reported in the LaRouche newspaper, New
Federalist, of Dec. 9, 1996. (But who will report on the
LaRouche organization's ties to the Catholic Church?) Says New
Federalist: "The article [in "Si" magazine], which nailed Bush
as frontman for the Rev. Moon's big move into Ibero-America --
where the Moonies own everything from shipyards to luxury hotels
and newspapers -- noted that Moon took over Uruguay's Banco de
Credito, and that he could very well do the same with Peru's
Interbank. From the Jewish or Christian standpoint, Moon is a
blasphemer who purports to be the Messiah; who strongly hints
that Jesus was the illegitimate offspring of an adulterous
relationship between the Virgin Mary and Zachariah, husband to
her cousin Elizabeth; and who says that Jesus was crucified
because He failed in His mission, by siding with the poor."
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
More on the Commerce Department employee found dead in her
office, from RMNews (November 1996 issue, phone 408-699-4135 for
more info). Quoting from the Nov. 30, 1996 *Shreveport Times*,
"Government Worker Found Dead In Office":
A Commerce Department employee was found dead in her fourth
floor office at the agency's downtown headquarters on
Friday (November 29th). The 48 year old, a secretary for
about 14 years, had worked for the department's
international trade administration.
And, an RMNews reader asks,
[Who was] wandering the halls of the Department of Commerce
between Wednesday afternoon, November 27th, when the
unnamed Commerce victim was last seen alive; and Friday,
November 29, when her "partially nude" body was discovered?
Is it worthy to note that Commerce offices were closed for
Thanksgiving? Did the Commerce Department international
trade administration, in which the victim had worked for 14
years, have any connection with John Huang and the current
DNC money scandal?
RMNews itself adds that,
Rumor Mill sources tell us that the dead woman was Barbara
Wiese(sp?). She was the assistant to Mickey Kantor, the
Secretary of Commerce. In other words, this dead woman
wasn't a lowly secretary. This woman had worked in a high
level Commerce position for 14 years, and the story barely
makes two paragraphs! It feels like a coverup to me.
RMNews sources further state that she was a grand jury
witness against Bill Clinton. If this is true, then
Kenneth Starr needs to do more to keep his witnesses alive!
Her partially nude body was discovered in a *locked*
*room*! Eye witnesses have told our sources that there
were bruises on her body. No cause of death has been
released. Does anyone else smell a rotten fish?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

90
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-89.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 89
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
THE HELICOPTER GOLFER
=====================
David Watkins was fired from his high-level White House job by
Bill Clinton who was shocked -- shocked -- that Watkins had used
a helicopter assigned to the White House to go golfing. The
January 1997 American Spectator gives the big picture of what
seems to have really happened.
According to the article by Rebecca Borders ("Hell to Pay"),
Watkins, a boyhood chum of Bill Clinton, helped work a special
financial deal during the future-President's 1992 campaign.
Watkins allegedly set up a scheme with World Wide Travel of
Little Rock whereby the travel agency billed journalists
traveling with the Clinton entourage *in* *advance*, the money
was then funneled to the Clinton campaign, and World Wide agreed
to not request payment until after the election.
Early in the Clinton presidency, Watkins says, he was stuck with
the job of firing Billy Dale and other White House Travel Office
personnel. Says Watkins: "Hillary [Clinton] wanted the Travel
Office guys fired, so there was no question that I had to act
upon her wishes."
The firing of the Travel Office employees resulted in scandal,
and Watkins appeared set up to play the role of fall guy. Under
pressure, he seems to have broken the code of *omerta* -- silence
-- when he testified that Hillary had "urged the action be taken
to get 'our people' into the Travel Office." (Hinted at is that
"our people" may have been campaign-funders World Wide Travel
and/or associates.)
In what looks like revenge for fingering Hillary, about a month
after his testimony Watkins' White House office was relocated to
the Old Executive Office Building. It is almost certain that the
Clinton gang next leaked damaging information on Watkins to the
Wall Street Journal, which information was then printed on page
one.
The punishment for Watkins' breaking ranks had its *coup de
grace* with the helicopter golfing episode. Watkins says he was
only scouting territory for Clinton as a means to lure him to
Camp David. Supposedly, there was a morale problem at Camp David
because President Clinton rarely went there. Watkins' objective
reportedly was to find a way to bait Clinton and reel him in to
Camp David, with good golfing being the bait.
After the helicopter golfer story made big news, Clinton phoned
Watkins to ask his side of things. Watkins says he asked to meet
personally with the President to tell his side of the story.
Clinton reportedly agreed to meet after an imminent press
conference, but then *during* that press conference stuck it to
Watkins when he surprisingly announced that Watkins had resigned.
At that point there was no turning back. But lucky for Watkins,
worse than that didn't happen to him, as it has to others who get
on the wrong side of the yuppie President.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

145
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-90.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 90
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TEN PREDICTIONS
===============
1.) The stock market will continue to go up, up, up. Driving
this will be the simple fact that the rich are getting richer.
As the gap between rich and poor continues to widen, this will be
reflected in the rich man's haven for funds, Wall Street.
Corporate yes-man Bill Clinton, totally at the mercy of the
corporados (due to a Fibber McGee closet full of skeletons) will
dance to their tune. Look for the yet relatively untapped
privatization bonanza (a la Mexico) to pump New York's financial
machine chock full of money to play with. How about privatizing
social security, huh? Think how much mad money that will give
Wall Street.
Of course, Wall Street is filled with shady characters. This
is one factor working against a rise in the stock market. Stock
market associates are among the shiftiest looking persons
imaginable... such as Alan Greenspan, for example. What's that
you say? Alan Greenspan is not associated with the stock market?
*Oh* *yeah*??
2.) Hillary Clinton will *not* be indicted in 1997. Kenneth
Starr has a nice job; do you think he'll want to take on the
extra burden of real work by indicting someone big like Hillary?
If he did, he'd have to take all kinds of heat and he'd have to
do the real work of prosecution. Why not just shuffle papers,
form committees to "look into the matter," and periodically send
out mysterious "insiders" to whisper in the ears of too-trusting
guerrilla journalists? Even this editor has been contacted by
one of these mysterious fellows, who urged a prompt secret
meeting at the Indiana border. "Why not just tell me over the
phone?" I asked. "Because you have the most tapped phone in
Champaign, Illinois," was the breathless reply. If I had gone to
the Indiana border meeting and received the so-called "sensitive
data," no doubt it would have *sotto* *voce* informed me that
lazybones Starr was about to get off his ass and *do* something.
Perhaps this "sensitive data" would have been handed to me by a
*mysterious* *stranger*, wearing a patch over one eye and a
trenchcoat! Hoo boy, Conspiracy Nation, have I got a hot story
for you!
Would the DEA actually risk winning the "War on Drugs" by
doing something like going after the big bankers? Hey, DEA is
not stupid. If they ever won the "War on Drugs" they'd be out of
a job. Will Kenneth Starr actually risk losing his present
peaceful past-time by really doing anything? Look for Starr to
finally release his "Special Report" (a la Iran-Contra's Walsh)
right about the year 2000. In it he will use phrases such as
"serious questions" and "grave concerns."
3.) Hillary Clinton will lose weight and resemble the
good-looking chick she was in 1992. Until now she has been
burdened with grief and sorrow over the death of her beloved
Vince Foster. Her grief had expressed itself by overeating, but
now the season of mourning has ended. And who can blame Hillary
for an affair with Vince Foster? Look at the guy she's married
to! Go ahead, Hillary, lose some weight and even find true love
once more! Go get 'em, Hillary!
4.) The American public will, by and large, continue to out-do
the ancient Romans in their gladiator worship. They will mostly
sit on the couch, eat, and watch endless football, baseball and
basketball on television. As long as their bellys are full, hey,
what do they care!? "Give them bread and circuses," nod the
Caesars of Washington, knowingly.
5.) There will be a major "terrorist" event, such as the
Oklahoma bombing. The corpse of the American body politic will
jump off its couch, galvanized, and twitch about, exclaiming that
it is "angry" and "concerned" and "something must be done." A
week later, the galvanized corpse will have settled back on the
sofa for more rah-rah endless sports entertainments.
6.) The major "news" media will continue to prop up Bill
Clinton, unless they are signalled to do otherwise by their
corporate owners. If Bill Clinton should attempt to do something
honest and decent, such as in any way favoring the interest of
working stiffs, look for the maajor "news" networks to suddenly
"discover" that there is something strange about the death of
Vince Foster. Get the message, Bill? Do like we tell you, or
else we'll actually report on you.
7.) Taxes will go up, but in hidden ways. Look for "safety
taxes," such as implemented by Illinois Governor Jim Edgar.
"Little Jim" raised fines for speeding from $75 to $150
overnight. It's not that he's raised your taxes, you see. It's
just that he is mightily concerned about your safety.
8.) The Pope, a.k.a. The Potato, will die in 1997. This Pope
is no longer young and sexy and must go. The Catholic Church
needs revenue enhancers, a.k.a. converts, and the current Potato
is no longer fulfilling super-salesman quotas for the Church. He
will not necessarily be assassinated exactly, but subtle
maneuvers will hasten his demise -- such as, not top-notch care
from his physicians or not the best food from his cooks. With
his dying breath, he will piously forgive Conspiracy Nation for
its "sins." The new Pope will get rid of that awful, tacky
"Pope-mobile," the auto used by the present Potato, and will
replace it with something a little more hep.
9.) Chicago will boom economically. With Bill Daley of the
infamous Chicago Daley political dynasty as Commerce Secretary,
Chicago politics has landed in that "Rome on the Potomac,"
Washington, D.C. You remember all of Sherman Skolnick's reports
on Chicago politics? Well if you thought corruption under Ron
Brown was bad, wait until you see what Ron Brown II can do.
First Arkansas machine politics came to that little town that
rules the world; now, look out: the Chicago machine has arrived
in Washington, D.C.
10.) Sherman Skolnick will continue to pursue stories on Jay
Rockefeller, a harmless Senator from West Virginia who has become
Skolnick's Professor Moriarty.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

147
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-91.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 91
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"POSTMODERN" PILATE
===================
(From *A New Model of the Universe* by P.D. Ouspensky)
------------------------------------------------------
Speaking generally, in order to understand the idea of superman
it is useful to have in mind everything opposed to the idea.
From this point of view it is interesting to note that besides a
devil in check trousers who has had himself vaccinated [see
*Brothers Karamazoff* by Dostoevsky], there is another very
well-known type, uniting in itself all in man that is most
opposed to the superhuman. Such is the Roman procurator of Judea
in the time of Jesus -- Pontius Pilate.
The role of Pilate in the gospel tragedy is extremely
characteristic and significant, and if it was a conscious role,
it would be one of the most difficult. But is strange that
perhaps of all the roles of the Gospel drama the role of Pilate
needs least of all to be a conscious one. Pilate could not "make
a mistake," could not act in this way or in that way, and
therefore he was taken in his natural state as a part of the
surroundings and conditions, just as were the people who gathered
in Jerusalem for the Passover and the crowd who shouted "crucify
him." And the role of Pilate is identical with the roles of the
"Pilates" in life in general. It is not sufficient to say that
Pilate tried Jesus, wanted to free him, and finally executed him.
This does not determine the essence of his nature. The chief
point lies in the fact that Pilate was almost the only one who
*understood* Jesus. He understood him, of course, in his own
Roman way; yet, in spite of understanding, he delivered him to be
scourged and executed. Pilate was undoubtedly a very clever man,
well educated and cultured. He saw very clearly that the man who
stood before him was no criminal "preaching sedition to the
people" or "inducing them not to pay their taxes," etc., as was
declared to him by the "truly Jewish people" {1} of that time;
that this man was not a pretender, not an imposter who called
himself the King of Judea, but simply a "philosopher," as he
could define Jesus to himself.
This "philosopher" aroused his sympathy, even his compassion.
The Jews clamouring for the blood of an innocent man were
repellent to him. He tried to help Jesus. But it was too much
for him to fight for Jesus in earnest and incur unpleasantness,
so, after a short hesitation, Pilate delivered him up to the
Jews.
It was probably in his mind that he was serving Rome and in this
particular case was safeguarding the peace of its rulers,
maintaining order and quiet among the subject people, averting
the cause of possible unrest, even sacrificing an innocent man
for it. It was done in the name of politics, in the name of
Rome, and the responsibility seemed to fall on Rome. Certainly
Pilate could not have known that the days of Rome itself were
already numbered, and that he himself was creating one of the
forces that were to destroy Rome. But the thinking of Pilates
never goes so far as that. Moreover, Pilate with regard to his
own actions had a very convenient philosophy: everything is
relative, everything is a question of point of view, nothing is
of any particular value. It was a practical application of the
"principle of relativity." On the whole Pilate is a very modern
man. With such a philosophy it is easy to find the way amidst
the difficulties of life.
Jesus even helped him; he said:
For this came I into the world that I should bear witness
unto the truth.
"What is truth?" ironically answered Pilate.
And this at once put him into his accustomed way of thinking and
acting, reminded him who and where he was, showed him how he
should look at things.
Pilate's essential feature is that he sees the truth but does not
wish to follow it. In order to avoid following the truth which
he sees, he has to create for himself a special sceptical and
mocking attitude towards the very idea of truth and towards the
adherents of the idea. In his own heart he is no longer able to
regard them as criminals; he has outgrown this; but he must
cultivate in himself a certain slightly ironical attitude towards
them, which will allow him to sacrifice them when it is
necessary.
Pilate went so far that he even tried to set Jesus free, but of
course he would not have allowed himself to do anything that
could compromise him. This would have made him ridiculous in his
own eyes. When his attempts failed, as probably he could
foresee, he came out to the people and washed his hands, showing
by this that he disclaimed all responsibility.
The whole of Pilate is in this. The symbolical washing of hands
is indissolubly connected with the image of Pilate. The whole of
him is in this gesture.
For a man of real inner development there cannot be any washing
of hands. This gesture of inner deceit can never belong to such
a man.
"Pilate" is a type expressing that which in cultured humanity
hinders the inner development of man, and forms the chief
obstacle on the way to superman. Life is full of big and small
Pilates. "The crucifixion of Christ" can never be accomplished
without their help.
They see and understand the truth perfectly. But any
"regrettable necessity," or interests of politics as understood
by them, or interests of their own position, may force them to
betray truth and then *to* *wash* *their* *hands*.
---------------------------<< Notes >>---------------------------
{1} ...the "truly Jewish people"... An allusion [by Ouspensky]
to a patriotic organization with strong pogrom tendencies in
pre-war [pre-WWI] Russia -- "truly Russian people."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

202
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-92.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 92
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
HALE-BOPP COMETH
================
Our Story Thus Far:
-------------------
Back from a relaxing Christmas with the parental units and the
sibling rivals, reading through the e-mail, I saw much fuss over
the approach of the comet Hale-Bopp. Two amateur astronomers
named Hale and Bopp discovered that a planet-sized comet,
appearing to have a diameter of between 100 and 1000 miles, is
headed toward earth. It is not going to hit the earth. It
should be visible around March 9th of 1997.
The Story Gets Strange
----------------------
At this point the story gets strange. According to an
anonymous source quoted in the latest issue of Rumor Mill News
(PO Box 1784, Aptos, CA 95001-1784 -- $5 per issue), "Reputable
astronomers have said that it appears to have a spiral shaped
structure on its surface. Others have said that the 'planet' or
comet is 'cube' shaped." Some are going so far as to say that
the "spiral shaped structure" is some sort of alien spacecraft.
I don't know about that, but what *is* that "spiral shaped
structure?" The speculation has grown, in part, due to its being
discussed on the Art Bell radio program.
Wright-Patterson Air Base, Bosnia, Roswell, and the Vatican
-----------------------------------------------------------
More information on the subject is offered in the latest
RMNews. The anonymous source mentioned above connects the
Hale-Bopp story with Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ethnic
cleansing in Bosnia, and the apparent crash of an alien
spacecraft near Roswell, New Mexico, in 1947. RMNews also
includes a letter, said to have been written by an anonymous
priest and sent to Art Bell. Commenting on the letter from the
"anonymous priest," RMNews writes,
The intelligence arm of the Vatican is by far the most
sophisticated in the world. It has been around far longer
than all of the intelligence agencies put together. When
the ancestors of MI-6 were still painting themselves blue
and running around naked, Vatican Intelligence was already
weaving its web upon the planet.
The world of covert intrigue, spies, assassins, espionage,
propaganda and black operations were invented by the
Vatican, or at least honed, by them, to a fine edge. The
CIA, NSA, KGB, MI-6 and the Mossad may have higher
visibility than Vatican Intelligence, but the most
effective intelligence operations are the ones that no one
knows anything about.
Letter From a Priest
--------------------
Here is the "Letter from Priest," from the latest issue of
RMNews:
Date: 96-12-11
Dear Mr. Bell,
I have listened to your program off and on for around two
years now, whenever I get "downtime." I have some
disturbing information and I feel that your program would
be the perfect vehicle with which to distribute what I
have.
I have been under the employ of the Vatican for over five
years. I have done what could best be described as
counter-intelligence work, for the church. I am a man of
God and please believe me when I tell you that the
information I have is genuine, and very serious.
Without going into too much detail about my former
employers, I will briefly tell you that I have had a Top
Level security clearance in the Vatican for quite some
time. Most of the work I have done regrettably falls into
the realm of "black ops," and I will not go into detail
about that now.
Around six months ago, I was working at a data terminal in
a highly restricted area following a case that I had just
completed, when I stumbled onto something that nearly made
my heart stop. Please pay attention here, this is where it
gets strange.
I uncovered a heavily encrypted sub-system that was
surprisingly well hidden. I found that it was only
accessible through the terminal I was at, and one other
terminal. (I must point out that the area I was in was not
an area that I routinely used.) After two minutes of
trying to get into the system, the whole lab shut itself
down and I was booted off the terminal. Not wanting to
raise any eyebrows, I decided to leave and come back later
that night. The strange thing was, when I came back, there
were *armed* guards standing sentry outside of the lab. I
must say that it is not unusual to see guards roaming the
Vatican, but it is very unusual for them to stand sentry at
a lab, much less while armed.
Over the next month, I managed to slip in unnoticed only
once. And after I had found what I came for, I understood
the security.
It took me a great deal of time to break into the system,
and when I did, I wished I hadn't. When I entered the
system, I came across a file titled "WORMWOOD?". (Yes,
with a question mark.) Thinking it to be a test file, I
brought up the file with the intent of copying so I could
read it later. What happened next was truly remarkable.
The file sort of "deteriorated" into a series of command
lines that lasted approximately two minutes. Once it was
done running there it was.
I had found the direct link-up to the Hubble space
telescope. Not only that, but it was pointed directly at
the comet Hale-Bopp. The program was running some kind of
analysis. Taking directional notes, projecting path of
travel, etc. After realizing what I had discovered, I
started searching and came across an e-mail data trail that
led directly to the office of the Pope himself. What was
discussed, I cannot know.
Over the next two weeks, I began to uncover evidence that
the Vatican is very aware of the existence of the
companion, (a large body that appears to be following the
comet Hale-Bopp), and is *very* worried about it. I began
to copy files and pictures that were present at the
terminal, when I found a report from the United Nations to
the Vatican, as well as a report from NASA regarding their
concerns.
It is very obvious to me that a great many people and
entities know of the companion and are doing their best to
keep quiet. *Very* quiet. As the next part of my story
illustrates.
I had found another file that I wanted to look at, but it
was independently encrypted. At the time that I discovered
it, I had already been online at the terminal for some
time, so I decided to copy the file encrypted, and decode
it at my leisure. As I was leaving the lab, I was
approached by two of the Pope's top aides and was asked to
meet them later in the evening. I didn't feel comfortable
about the situation, so I agreed and told them that I
needed to shower, and would join them later. I haven't
been back to the Vatican since.
I found out about a week later through some old friends and
contacts that a contract had been placed on my life. Two
days later my mother and father were killed in a car crash
in France. Three days after that, my brother and sister
were killed when their single engine plane went down on the
East coast of the U.S. I've been on the run for a very long
time now, and am still trying to decode the file that I
have in my possession. Approximately ten copies have been
distributed to friends in the field in the event that I
should disappear. I do not fear for my life, as I am very
adept at not being found, however I believe that the world
needs to know of the information that I have. I would be
willing to share all that I have with you, Mr. Bell. But
you need to understand that your life could be in danger if
you were to go public with what I give you. I apologize
for being so vague, but I feel it necessary at this point
in time.
If you would like the information, say so over the air when
you get this letter. If I am not listening, someone will
get the information to me, as there is no safe way for you
to contact me at this point in time. I await your response.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

175
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-93.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 93
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A CIA FUNDING OPERATION
by Gene "Chip" Tatum
12/28/96
STEP 1:
Find a depository which fits the following criteria:
1. Large cash reserves.
2. Much of the cash reserves should represent deposits from
an illegal activity (ie: drug transactions). For this
example we will use Banco Nacional de Panama, a reserve
depository which is protected by Manuel Noriega. The
depositor will be Pablo Escobar. Finding the proper
depository would be the function of the CIA, and in this
example we will use William Casey.
STEP 2:
Arrange for a loan from this depository. We will use the name of
George Bush in this example for the person obtaining the loan.
We will use the amount of $8 billion for this example. Sometimes
the depository will not be very cooperative. If this occurs, the
CIA will coerce or intimidate the depository officials into
cooperating. Ultimately, the loan will be made.
STEP 3:
Split the loan proceeds in half. One half ($4 billion) will be
sent to Iran to purchase "super bills" at the rate of two "super
bills" for one authentic bill. Thus, $4 billion in cash buys $8
billion in "super bills." (NOTE: A "super bill" is a perfectly
counterfeited U.S. bill. These bills are printed by an Intaglio
press which was sold to the Shah of Iran in the late '60s, early
'70s. The Shah was also given the plates, ink and paper
necessary to successfully print U.S. dollars in large
denominations. This was given to the Shah by the CIA.
Unfortunately, the Shah left the press, plates, ink and paper for
the Iranian Revolutionary Councils when he fled in late 1978.)
The second half of the loan ($4 billion) will be sent to a CIA
launderer selected by the CIA (Casey) for his or her ability to
move largesums of money around the world as a matter of ordinary
business. For this example we will use the name of Nana DeBusia.
(DeBusia is the grandson of Guyana's first democratic leader and
owner of many U.S. and foreign banks.)
STEP 4:
Repay original loan to depository in "super bills." (Give Banco
Nacional de Panama $8 billion in "super bills" to replace the
authentic currency it loaned.) These "super bills" are placed in
the reserve vault and, as long as they are not withdrawn by the
depositor, their existence will not jeopardize the value of the
U.S. dollar. But, because they are perfect in every way, to put
the "super bills" in circulation would eventually devalue the
U.S. dollar by flooding the monetary marketplace with U.S.
currency.
STEP 5:
Arrange to sell Iran something of value for the authentic
currency used to purchase the "super bills." In this example, we
will use arms, ammunition and replacement parts for military
equipment. (We will use the name Oliver North as the example of
a person arranging the sale of arms to Iran.) In other words,
the CIA now arranges to sell Iran $4 billion worth of arms and
equipment in order to get the original $4 billion of authentic
currency back. Now, the CIA has $4 billion to use in funding
covert activities without relying on Congressional authority and
funding. If caught, the CIA can report the source of funds as
being from an arms transaction with Iran.
STEP 6:
Ensure that the "super bills" are not withdrawn. This is done
through the process of neutralization of the depositor.
Neutralization is the use of intimidation, coercion or
termination. In this example, Pablo Escobar is killed.
STEP 7:
This CIA launderer in possession of one-half of the original loan
proceeds is moving his $4 billion through a maze of banks which
are cooperative with both the launderer and the CIA. For this
example, we will use the following trail of deposits to banks: a
bank in Spain; the Vatican Bank; banks in Luxembourg. Then the
launderer wires from his London offices $3.8 billion in laundered
monies to private numbered accounts being controlled by the
original architects. The launderer keeps $200 million for his
job well done, leaving the $3.8 billion in the numbered accounts.
STEP 8:
Neutralize the CIA launderer. In this example Nana DeBusia was
indicted by the U.S. on 32 counts to include bank fraud. The CIA
stepped up in his behalf and stated that it would not be in the
best interest of the U.S. to prosecute DeBusia. He was facing
several hundred years in prison if convicted. He was
subsequently acquitted on all counts.
CIA TALLY
$4 billion for use in unauthorized black ops*
(*black operations are those covert operations performed
without the knowledge or authority of Congress.)
$3.8 billion in private numbered accounts controlled by the
architects of the funding operation
SUMMARY OF THE EXAMPLE
To summarize the example, the Director of the CIA, William Casey,
approached the Ex-Director of the CIA and current Vice President
of the United States, George Bush, with the name of a vulnerable
depository, the Banco Nacional de Panama. Vice President Bush
then arranged for a short term loan of $8 billion. Bush arranged
for $4 billion to go to Iran to purchase super bills and $4
billion to go to Nana DeBusia to be laundered into several
private accounts. He (Bush) commissioned Oliver North to oversee
the Iranian connection. North delivered $4 billion in U.S.
currency to Iran. Iran gave North $8 billion in super bills in
exchange for the $4 billion in good U.S. currency. North then
delivered the $8 billion in super bills back to the Banco
Nacional de Panama. The loan transaction is now complete.
There is $8 billion in super bills in the reserve vaults of the
Banco Nacional de Panama, there is $4 billion in authentic U.S.
currency in the hands of the Iranians, and there is $4 billion in
good currency with CIA launderer Nana DeBusia. North sells the
Iranians military hardware and parts for the amount of $4 billion
and diverts a portion of the proceeds to the Contras of Nicaragua
(Iran/Contra). Nana DeBusia, in the meantime, is laundering the
deposits of $4 billion through various banks, including the
Vatican's bank in Italy. After several successful banking
transactions, DeBusia presents $3.8 billion in the sound deposits
to numbered accounts in various locations. When the funding
operation is complete, there is $4 billion in CIA accounts to be
utilized for covert and black operations; there is $3.8 billion
in private numbered accounts controlled by George Bush and
William Casey. Pablo Escobar, the primary depositor is dead to
ensure no one will withdraw the super bills. General Noriega is
in U.S. federal prison and under constant U.S. guard to ensure
his silence, and William Casey is dead, leaving $3.8 billion in
good U.S. currency in the control of George Bush.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
For further background on Gene Tatum, see past issues of
Conspiracy Nation, especially CN 8.62, CN 8.63, and CN 8.64,
archived at ftp.shout.net in subdirectory pub/users/bigred/vol8
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

203
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-94.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,203 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 94
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
LOOSE THREADS
=============
You may not understand all this. *I* certainly don't. If you
are a newcomer to reading Conspiracy Nation (CN), you will
probably be even moreso in the dark. What follows are lines of
inquiry, "loose threads," in a developing story. For further
background, readers are referred to the CN archives at
ftp.shout.net in sub-directory pub/users/bigred and to Professor
J. Orlin Grabbe's archives. See especially the Grabbe material
available at http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
More background to this story will be provided soon in CN.
Loose Thread #1
---------------
On November 11, 1996, The Washington Weekly
(http://www.federal.com) published a story, based on a recently
declassified National Security Agency (NSA) document, "Vince
Foster Involved in NSA Computer Espionage Issues." It reports on
a May 1993 meeting involving Bernard Nussbaum, Vincent Foster,
Webster Hubbell, John Rogovin, and Supreme Court Justice John
Paul Stevens. The secret meeting was held at NSA headquarters.
The presence of Foster at the meeting, in which cryptology and
intelligence gathering were the topics, shows that Foster was on
the inside of top secret NSA intelligence discussions. Yet,
according to the article from the Washington Weekly, the White
House has tried to conceal Foster's ties to NSA.
Then, by November 18, 1996, The Washington Weekly had obtained
an additional 540 pages of documents from NSA in response to a
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. The information
showed that the U.S. Embassy in London had been highly interested
in stories, regarding the by now deceased Vince Foster, being
reported in British newspapers. The embassy was sending their
then-secret reports to, among several U.S. agencies, the National
Security Agency.
In "Plot to Spy on Banks Outlined in White House Email,"
Professor Grabbe includes a document declassified by the National
Archives on August 22, 1994. In that document, a memo from David
Wigg to Oliver North, North's connection to the tracking of
"financial flows... through the 400 or so principal banks that
make up the interbank market" is pointed to. In other words, a
plan to spy on banks was in the works.
Oliver North as moneyman is also shown in an article by Gene
Tatum, "A CIA Funding Operation." (See CN 9.93) In that report,
Tatum claims that "North delivered $4 billion in U.S. currency to
Iran. Iran gave North $8 billion in super bills in exchange for
the $4 billion in good U.S. currency. North then delivered the
$8 billion in super bills back to the Banco Nacional de Panama."
Loose Thread #2
---------------
In CN 9.90, I mentioned that I had been contacted by someone
who urged a prompt meeting at the Indiana border. This person
has been previously-mentioned in CN: "Mr. Boderby" (not his real
name.) Working to facilitate the meeting was "Mr. Royce" (not
his real name; see my interview of Joseph Andreuccetti, archived
at the prairienet site, for mention of "Mr. Royce," who dined
with myself, Sherman Skolnick, and Joseph Andreuccetti at a
restaurant in Calumet City, Illinois, in April of 1995. The
relevant material is accessed as follows: (a) telnet
prairienet.org (b) logon as "visitor" (c) "go citcom" (d) look in
the Whitewater sub-menu for "The Andreuccetti Affair.")
Loose Thread #3
---------------
This past week I received via U.S. mail a document, from "Mr.
Boderby," purporting to be an article written by J. Orlin Grabbe,
"The FBI Conspiracy Against Chuck Hayes." *If* Grabbe is the
actual author, the former Wharton professor is saying that "The
highest levels of the FBI are engaged in a conspiracy to obstruct
justice by denying Charles S. Hayes the right to legal
representation, by denying him the right to any discovery
materials, and by denying him the opportunity to prepare a
defense." Hayes is supposedly a deep-level former and/or current
intelligence operative who has been acting as a renegade, working
against government corruption and without the blessing of that
same government. Regardless of unsavoury connections, Hayes is
entitled to the same due process protections as any other
citizen. Or can the government now just deny due process to
whomever it wishes, then ameliorate the outrage by merely leaking
that, "It's O.K. This guy was with the CIA?"
In the document sent to me by "Boderby" and apparently written
by Grabbe, we learn that as of November 22, 1996, Chuck Hayes has
as his legal representative a man named Jim Vassilos. I can't
give the specifics of the connection, but Vassilos *is* connected
to "Mr. Boderby." Another loose thread is Vassilos's connection
to ex-NYPD Vice Squad Detective James Rothstein. In a videotape
of a lecture by Rothstein, he mentions that Vassilos accompanied
him on a trip he made to Oklahoma City with purpose of privately
investigating the April 19, 1995 bombings at the Murrah Building.
Loose Thread #4
---------------
In a conversation today (Jan. 5, 1997) with Sherman Skolnick,
the Chicago investigator voiced suspicion of alternative
journalists who suddenly "popped up from nowhere" around the time
of the Oklahoma City bombings. This was in response to my own
question as to Skolnick's assertion that the controversial
Hayes/Norman/Grabbe "Angel of Death" story is just a melodramatic
embellishment of Skolnick's previous material. Skolnick says he
has no private vendetta against either Grabbe, Norman, or Hayes,
but that their embellishment of his story is subtly misleading.
Regarding Mr. Norman, Skolnick thinks that he was a "babe in the
woods" in espionage matters when he was taken in by Hayes's
manipulation. Regarding Grabbe, Skolnick puts him in the
category of those who "popped up from nowhere" around the time of
the OKC bombings. Did Grabbe suddenly appear on Internet right
about that time? I don't recall.
Professor Grabbe will perhaps respond by hinting, as he has to
me in the past, that Skolnick is somehow connected to the Mossad.
Anticipating this reaction, I asked Mr. Skolnick how he would
respond to that. Skolnick pointed out that, just because he is a
traditional Jew, that doesn't necessarily mean he is involved
with the Mossad. He further pointed out that, in the past, he
has been a leading critic of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and
that as far back as 1970 he had identified ADL as a spy operation
with links to the FBI. For its part, according to Skolnick, ADL
contends that the Chicago underground journalist is a renegade
Jew out to damage Israel. ADL has even tried to block his
popular cable television program, says Skolnick. My own thinking
on this is that to label Mr. Skolnick as involved with the
Mossad, based only on the fact that he is Jewish, is something
unworthy of a keen intellect such as Grabbe's.
The "embellishment" of Skolnick's material is summarized by
him as follows. James Norman had been calling Skolnick from time
to time. Among Norman's questions were inquiries as to
Skolnick's "BCCI bribe list" story. Norman reportedly asked
Skolnick, in relation to his publication on Internet of the names
of 22 U.S. Senators allegedly involved, "You've got a story on
the BCCI bribe list with *22* names? Where are the other names?"
Skolnick says he had published an incomplete list of names as a
way to test Norman and others. Norman reportedly read some of
the remaining names. Skolnick's complete list of names *had*
been faxed to The Spotlight in 1991 but Spotlight did not publish
the actual list of names, just the general story itself. It
seems likely that part of the actual list found its way from
there into Norman's hands.
How is the Norman/Grabbe/Hayes "embellishment" of Skolnick's
story misleading? One thing said to be wrong is the assertion
that Hayes and the "Fifth Column" did not keep the appropriated
money for itself, but rather turned it over to a U.S. Treasury
holding account. In an interview I had with retired detective
Rothstein, he also expressed skepticism about that aspect of the
story. Mr. Skolnick's sources contend that no such money was
transferred to a Treasury holding account. But more
fundamentally, the story is partly wrong in that it diverts
attention from the Bank of England and from Cayman Islands
financial nuclei and focuses on Swiss banks. The BCCI bribe list
was reportedly accidentally made available to the public for 30
days (until the mistake of making the list public was rectified)
at the Bank of England. *This*, says Skolnick, is the real
story; that U.S. Congresspersons had been bought off by BCCI,
with many trails of that corruption leading to *London*. It is
widely known that BCCI *did* in fact spread its money around with
said purpose. The widespread retirements by U.S. Senators and
Representatives, with so many saying they have decided they want
to "spend more time with their families," may have been due to
pressure from news outlets knowledgeable about the said "BCCI
bribe list." It appears *that* possibility of imminent exposure
by news outlets, and not a masked "Lone Ranger" (Hayes) and his
helper "Tonto" (Norman), is the real cause of the recent wave of
retirements in Washington, D.C.
Mr. Skolnick says that persons wanting to subtly twist his
stories to their own purposes is not new to him. When he had
begun reporting his stories on Bill Clinton's trip to Moscow
during his student days, Skolnick perceived pressure from Media
Bypass Magazine to play up the angle of "Clinton is a communist."
However Skolnick would not do so, since his view has been that
Clinton's trip to Moscow was at the behest of the CIA.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

194
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-95.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 95
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES OF MEETINGS/CONVERSATIONS ON INSLAW & FOSTERGATE (10/21/95)
=================================================================
By "Mr. Mercedes" (Pseudonym)
-----------------------------
When James Norman wrote the Forbes 1/31/95 cover story, "Oil,
Guns & Greed" where he had worked for five years and was a Senior
Editor at a $100,000 year salary. The focus of this cover story
was Carlos Cardoen, a Chilean arms merchant who sold hundreds of
millions of dollars worth of cluster bombs and other weapons to
Iraq, while using Chase Manhattan Bank to finance his operation
through "set up" oil trades and with the full cooperation and
knowledge of DCI [Director of Central Intelligence] Bill Gates.
He probably had no idea where it would lead and that 6 months
later he would be abruptly fired on 8/16 and less than a week
after I told him in person that he should expect to be fired
quite soon because of what he had written outside of Forbes and
because of what he was continuing to investigate.
The Cardoen story led Norman to Harry Wechsler, Pres. of Boston
Systematics and, purportedly, a former CIA and/or Mossad agent
who has also been selling Inslaw's bootlegged and bugged enhanced
PROMIS software around the world. Wechsler was also a key person
involved in pulling off the October Surprise for the Israelis,
according to Lt. Commander Alexander Martin (Ret.), who was
involved in many 1980s covert ops as an aide to General Richard
Secord (Ret.), and is now assisting with the investigations of
the House Whitewater Committee. Wechsler's daughter, Dana, has
been a senior editor at Forbes for 6-7 years, a CIA contract
employee, and both have been sources for James Norman. The big
question is, did they feed Norman disinformation to direct him
away from Wechsler's key role in the illegal sale of PROMIS from
his subsidiary company, Israeli Systematics.
This article led Norman into [investigating] government software
theft and espionage, covert activities of computerized money
laundering and drugs and arms dealing, interweaving a cast of
characters, government agencies and companies which include:
Inslaw, the CIA, NSA, Mossad, Vince Foster, Webster Hubbell,
Robert Maxwell, Arkansas billionaire Jackson Stephens,
Systematics (Jackson Stephens-owned company and now merged into
Alltel with Stephen's 8 percent interest), numerous secret Swiss
bank accounts, which lead right up to and included Bill and
Hillary Clinton, and former Presidents Reagan and Bush, all sown
together with a thread called PROMIS (Prosecutor's Management
Information Systems) software.
The intent of this report is to present evidence and leads,
without pre-conceived notions or hidden agendas, which should be
objectively investigated and reported by unbiased journalists in
order to honestly verify or refute the information of James
Norman and others. This document doesn't presume to be the final
word, but it is an attempt to lay out possible evidence and
people within the Clinton administration, Park Police, Department
of Justice, [which] Kenneth Starr's investigations and the Senate
and House Whitewater/Foster hearings should be investigating.
One of the most invisible and invincible central figures in this
cast is Jackson Stephens. He has been a major contributor to
Bush, loaned the Clinton Election Committee a critical $2 million
from his family's Worthen Bank (Stephens recently had it
purchased by the larger Boatsman Bank of St. Louis, thus ending a
Federal Reserve investigation), and is now, of all things, the
Finance Chairman for Bob Dole. Stephens is an investor in or
owner of numerous companies such as Beverly Enterprises (a major
national nursing home chain and one of Earl Brian's numerous
companies; Earl Brian, another central figure, will be described
later), and two Arkansas newspapers, the Northwest Arkansas Times
and the Morning News of Northwest Arkansas. He was also the
original front man for BCCI in the late 1970s when he tried to
get them (M. Potts, N. Kochan & R. Whittington, "Dirty Money:
The Inside Story of BCCI" and John Beaty "Outlaw Bank: BCCI")
into the U.S. through the purchase of First American (Wall Street
Journal article, 8/7/95, "Who is Dan Lasater," Wall Street
Journal 2-page profile article, ?/?/93, and Monetary & Economic
Review 6/92 article, "Clinton Selected to be Next President"),
prior to Clark Clifford and Roger Altman getting involved through
First American Bank.
Despite Mike Wallace's "60 Minutes" 10/18 shoddy and slanted
hatch-job report on journalist Christopher Ruddy and Lisa
Foster's New Yorker 9/11/95 "conspiracy rebuttal" article, a big
mystery still remains as to whether or not all or some of these
elements and inter-related people came together to cause the
death of Vince Foster. As Chicago investigative reporter Sherman
Skolnick states, Lisa Foster's "cover-up" story should be
seriously questioned. In his 9/11/95 "The Money Trail" release,
Skolnick reports that Lisa Foster received $285,000 just 4 days
prior to Vince Foster's death from bank heir Richard Mellon
Scaife, who passed it through Sheila Foster Anthony (Vince
Foster's sister and former Congressman Beryl Anthony's wife).
Furthermore, it just so happens that Sheila Foster Anthony is in
a very important Department of Justice section which is involved
in appointments of Federal Judges, U.S. Attorneys, and U.S.
Marshalls. Also, Richard Mellon Scaife is facing possible
prosecution on alleged federal banking regulations violations
(Sarah McClendon's Washington Report, 9/5/95).
Additionally, when Lisa Foster was questioned by the FBI on
5/1/94, she raised doubts about Vince Foster's so-called "suicide
note." She stated that Vince Foster had written it on or about
7/11/93 and they were his talking points for a scheduled meeting
on 7/22/93 with the President and an upcoming Congressional
hearing, neither of which Vince Foster kept since he was already
conveniently dead on 7/20. Additionally that so-called last
"relaxation weekend" at major Clinton and Democratic fundraiser
Nathan Landau's shore estate with Webster Hubbell and others was
a "damage control" session, bugged by the CIA, for the impending
scandal described below in which Vince Foster was under
investigation for espionage.
Besides all the forensic and crime scene discrepancies and the
apparent "cover-up" by the White House personnel's inappropriate
actions after Foster's death, there was a significant discrepancy
with the gun Vince Foster supposedly shot himself with and the
"silver colored gun" which Lisa Foster also told the FBI that
Vince had brought with him from Arkansas. (Mike Blair's "Foster
Gun, Note Questions" Spotlight 8/21/95). If Vince Foster was
shot with the "silver colored gun" which was found in the park
near his body, why did Lisa Foster find another gun in its place
on the very night after his death? And finally, in addition to
all the other mysterious evidence found on or around his body,
why did ballistics and forensics experts find that Vince Foster
was shot by a turn-of-the-century Colt .38 caliber Army revolver?
James Norman completed his Vince Foster story for Forbes in April
of 1995 and it was ready for publication in the May issue, after
being thoroughly checked and edited, but [it] was pulled after
receiving an April 25 letter from the White House Press
Secretary, Michael McCurry. Norman was then given permission to
have his article published by another magazine (Media Bypass
Magazine, 8/95, "Fostergate") if he withheld his Forbes
affiliation. He has just come out with a followup article,
"Fostergate II" in the 10/95 [Media Bypass] issue. Norman claims
he was fired for continuing to investigate the Vince Foster
story, which led back to Forbes' Chairman Emeritus and former
Secretary of Defense, Caspar Weinberger. Forbes' media relations
person, Ray Healy, claimed that "James Norman resigned and that
he was a good journalist and they would miss him," but because of
their editorial policy he would not comment on anything written
outside of Forbes.
In the process of investigating the Vince Foster story, Norman
came into contact with Charles "Chuck" Hayes, purportedly a
former CIA agent with S1 clearance (highest level) with a
codename of "Running Fox." In my interview with him, he claims
to have been involved in the CIA's Cuba covert ops to run weapons
into Castro to overthrow Pres. Batista. Hayes stated that he
knew George Bush as the CIA's paymaster as far back as 1958, all
of which he [Bush] denies (see [J. Edgar] Hoover 1963 letter
which refers to Bush of CIA). On one occasion, he [Hayes] claims
to have put a gun into Bush's mouth in order to get him to pay
up. [CN: Bush reportedly leaked in his pants at that point.]
While serving in Vietnam in covert ops, Hayes disobeyed orders
and flew his jet fighter into Hanoi and took out a SAM missile
storage depot. On a Mena, Arkansas arms flight to the Contras,
he discovered coke [cocaine] stored in the belly of his plane and
dumped it on the awaiting covert team at the airport while
avoiding being shot down by them.
[...to be continued...]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

173
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-96.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 96
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES OF MEETINGS/CONVERSATIONS ON INSLAW & FOSTERGATE (10/21/95)
=================================================================
By "Mr. Mercedes" (Pseudonym)
-----------------------------
[...continued...]
Recently, he [Chuck Hayes] settled a suit with the Government
over buying used government computers with sensitive software
(maybe even PROMIS), wherein they paid him around $200,000 just
to keep him quiet. Supposedly, Chuck Hayes was one of the
founders of the CIA's Division D which developed and used new
spying techniques of electronic bugging for the last 15 years.
He is also supposed to be part of this group of contractors for
the CIA called the Fifth Column. Back in August '95, Hayes also
assisted the Meadows family by investigating their claim against
the Mellon bank and coming up with internal bank documents which
were presented in a Pittsburgh court. Several Internet J. Orlin
Grabbe reports over the last few months appear to have a lot of
input from Chuck Hayes, especially Part 28 ["NSA, Banks and
Foster," see http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html for details] on
our missile defense network and the latest one from 10/15, Part
29, which describes much of the money laundering activities and
covert ops of the 1980s. I'm sure the Intelligence Agencies,
Pentagon, Congress and the Clinton Administration are eagerly
awaiting -- not! -- the next amazing revelations in Part 30, 31,
32, etc., that is if Chuck Hayes isn't "taken out" first for just
one too many revelations.
Other sources for James Norman's story and/or this report
include: Jimmy Rothstein (the subject of former Daily
News/Village Voice reporter Bill Sherman's book, "Times Square,"
recounting his years as a former NYPD Vice cop who was forced to
retire because he got too close to the "big boys" and has
assisted with the U.S. Customs' Inslaw investigation), Cheri
Seymour (author and investigative journalist; Spotlight 4-part
series 3/3/95), and Michael Riconosciuto (recruited into CIA
after graduating from Stanford University at the age of 17 and
involved in numerous CIA ops, including arms dealing operations
with Iran and a meth amphetamine lab on the Cabazon Indian
Reservation in Yuma, Arizona, and now serving 32 years in Fed.
Prison on a "set up" drug bust.)
Many government officials and journalists have attempted and
mostly succeeded in their campaign to wrongfully discredit
Riconosciuto as they have done with so many other important
witnesses, either for ulterior motives or because they never
bothered to check him out personally and just relied on other
people's rumors and written dis- or misinformation. Jimmy
Rothstein and Cheri Seymour are the only people to personally
investigate and confirm Riconosciuto's involvement in numerous
CIA covert ops at Yuma Proving Grounds, in Lebanon and elsewhere
around the world. Rothstein discovered that Riconosciuto and
associates were arrested near Yuma by a highway patrolman for
having a Stinger missile in their car for which then-Attorney
General Edward Meese had to personally call to get them released
and arrest record destroyed. (James Rothstein letter to Brooks
Committee which never brought out this information in the Inslaw
hearings)
Additional sources also include: John Belton (Canadian
businessman whose company he worked for was ripped off for $50
million by Earl Brian (author of 5-page report in Elliot
Richardson's addendum rebuttal to Bua's report), Miguel Rodriguez
(former Kenneth Starr investigator who resigned under protest and
claimed there was a cover-up), Ari Ben-Menashe (Israeli involved
in October Surprise), Richard Babayan (Iranian involved in
October Surprise), Bob Bickel (undercover Customs investigator in
the 1980s), Gene Wheaton (former investigator with Special
Prosecutor Walsh on Iran-Contra, investigator for families on
Gander plane crash), Juval Aviv (former Mossad agent, head of his
own Private Investigating firm, Interfor, consultant on terrorism
to "60 Minutes" and ABC News who has been hit with a U.S.
government "harassment" criminal perjury action on his claim that
rogue CIA agents caused the Pan Am Flight 103 crash), as well as
a number of unnamed sources within the government, intelligence
community, computer experts, and other investigative journalists,
such as Sherman Skolnick (newsletters "Secret Report Links Foster
to Pollard" and "The Money Trail"), Virginia McCullough (sued by
Chief of Cabazon Indians for libel over her statements about
CIA's covert ops on Reservation, but was paid off to "shut up"),
and Danny Casolaro (died under mysterious circumstances while
working on his book "The Octopus" about Inslaw and former Dept.
of Justice Attorney Mike Abbel, but whose extensive notes speak
to us from beyond the grave).
Purportedly, under this CIA/NSA group of "Division D," the
government has been illegally mass producing software from
various companies like Microsoft. The government antitrust suit
against Microsoft is a pressure tactic against Microsoft in an
attempt to counteract claims for non-payment on massive amounts
of bugged and bootlegged software. When Martin Marrieta
purchased GE Aerospace, the CIA operation was moved to another
one of their facilities. It has been reported that $8
billion/year in pirated software is sold around the world out of
a total $17 billion/year (New York Times 8/24/95, Financial Times
of London 8/19/95, and the New York Post 8/22/95).
This computer operation is in addition to the CIA's purported
ongoing and extensive operations of smuggling and selling drugs
and arms, which help to fund other covert ops through these
illegal activities. Some of these CIA ops include: Air
America's Viet Nam smuggling (Jonathan Kwitney's "Crimes of
Patriots" and Bo Gritz's "Nation Betrayed" video and book about
Golden Triangle war lord Khun Sa and Richard Armitage), Columbian
Cartel/Iran-Contras/Mena airport smuggling, and Lebanon's Baca
Valley heroin smuggling, which may have been the real reason for
the Pan Am 103 crash (Joel Bainerman's, "The Crimes of a
President: Conspiracy and Cover-up in Bush and Reagan
Administration," Lester Coleman's, "On the Trail of the Octopus,"
and BBC-aired documentary, "The Maltese Double Cross"), also Iraq
(Alan Friedman's "Spider's Web"), Iran, Afghanistan, El Salvador
and Nicaraguan, etc., secret arms sales ops are more dangerous,
not to mention the enormous human suffering and deaths they have
caused.
Keep in mind that there have been numerous movies ("Air
America"), books (T. Ross and D. Wise's 1964 book, "The Invisible
Government" and John Prados "Presidents Secret Wars: CIA and
Pentagon Covert Ops") and articles (Wall Street Journal, Covert
Action Quarterly, Penthouse, and Spotlight) by or about former
CIA agents and military involved in these illegal Agency-approved
operations. Some of these include the Nugan Hand Bank (Penny
Lernoux's Penthouse article and book, "Blood Money,") Oliver
North, former-Director of Central Intelligence Bill Casey, former
CIA agent Ted Shackley ("Blonde Ghost" by David Korn), Gary
Sick's "October Surprise," Bob Parry's "Trick or Treason," Ari
Ben-Menashe's "Profits of War," Rodney Stich's "Defrauding
America," and former Houston Post reporter Pete Brewton's "The
Mafia, the CIA, and George Bush," Peter Dale Scott's "War
Conspiracy" and "Cocaine Politics," Linda Hunt's "Secret Agenda,"
and former DEA agents Celerino Castillo's "Powder Burns" and
Michael Levine's "The Big White Lie," CIA agent and arms dealer
to Libya Edwin P. Wilson (Joseph C. Goulden's "The Death
Merchant,") DEA informant and drug and arms smuggler Barry Seal
(HBO movie, Roger Morris and Sally Denton 7/95 Penthouse "Crimes
of Mena," Terry Reed's and John Cummings's "Compromised:
Clinton, Bush and the CIA"), etc.
[...to be continued...]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

195
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-97.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 97
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES OF MEETINGS/CONVERSATIONS ON INSLAW & FOSTERGATE (10/21/95)
=================================================================
By "Mr. Mercedes" (Pseudonym)
-----------------------------
[...continued...]
By the way, the Washington Post supposedly paid many thousands of
dollars to Roger Morris and Sally Denton for their story on Mena,
but after 11 weeks of delays they pulled it because they felt
they were getting jacked around and got Bob Guccione to publish
it in Penthouse 7/95. Also, Terry Reed has a book coming out on
Barry Seal/Mena, Arkansas. Another book project now underway is
the story of the CIA's drug op in New York with NYPD cop and
"made man" "Big Al" Carone, former Colonel in Army Intel. Carone
was the "bagman" for NYPD, friend of DCI Bill Casey, and "banker"
for the CIA's drugs op from 1946-80 (died of "CIA flu"), along
with other "bagmen" associates, Russell Herman (also died of "CIA
flu") and "fixer/briber" Al Hobert and NYPD "dirty" cop Gene
Howard who were all "on the take."
Two more CIA drug smuggling ops reports were broadcast on TV.
One program was done by Mike Wallace of "60 Minutes" which
re-broadcast his 2-year-old report on 9/3/95 about a Venezuelan
Cartel/CIA supposed cocaine smuggling sting operation.
Unfortunately, this CIA op allowed many millions of dollars of
powder to hit the streets of America, without ever busting
anyone. The other one was a British TV Ch. 4 broadcast of the
suppressed "The Maltese Doublecross" documentary on Pan Am 103's
heroin smuggling operation which presented witnesses and evidence
which showed that this may very well have been the real reason
for the bomb explosion which killed all passengers on board.
As for the CIA/NSA computer operation, it would appear that it is
relatively new and extremely lucrative. Estimates of just how
profitable this operation is range into the hundreds of millions
of dollars, which goes to funding "off the books" Black Ops, now
that Congress, with only a slightly higher degree of scrutiny,
has cut back on their funding.
James Norman, Bill Hamilton and many others state that in the
early 1980s the government expropriated Inslaw's revolutionary
and proprietary PROMIS software after Bill Hamilton had created
an advanced version of PROMIS which was originally developed
while he was at the NSA. It was based on computer aided software
engineering technologies which used software to create and modify
software, thus enabling PROMIS to be modified to a multitude of
applications because of its inherent versatility and
adaptability. The government realized its numerous applications
such as applying it to the secret purpose of tracking down
terrorist money in international banking.
The CIA, with operatives such as Oliver North and Ted Shackley,
purportedly used this very "adaptable" PROMIS to create secret
bank accounts through "computerized money laundering" for the
purpose of financing CIA covert ops, such as Iran-Contra and
Iraqgate. This led to another application, wherein the NSA/CIA
used it to create a compromised universal banking system which
could be secretly accessed by their bugged software, sold by NSA
"front companies" to unsuspecting banks, which allowed them
[NSA/CIA] to access secret accounts anywhere around the world.
Additionally, specially designed NSA chips have been placed in
computers, along with Inslaw's stolen PROMIS Plus, which are then
sold through these NSA "front companies," such as Systematics,
Boston Systematics, Hadron and Israeli Systematics and agents,
such as Robert Maxwell, to strategic and highly sensitive ally
and enemy customers alike. (Related articles and info: Time
8/19/95 "Onward Cyber Soldier," New York Times 8/19 "Citibank
Fraud Case Raises Computer Questions," Wall Street Journal's and
Wang Laboratories' John A. Dean 3/3/95 letter to DCI John
Woolsley.)
Purportedly, these bugged computers are set up to transmit their
sensitive information within by data bursts up to low-flying NSA
satellites. Inslaw and their Atlanta law firm, with the
assistance of attorney Eliott Richardson (Pres. Nixon's former
Attorney General who resigned in protest over Watergate), are
preparing to go back into the Court of Federal Claims in December
'95 after a more than 10-year battle to seek a multi-hundred
million dollar judgement for non-payment of royalties. A number
of knowledgeable people state that if PROMIS's advanced software
was stolen and used since the early 1980s for numerous
applications such as in our nuclear subs and nuclear missile
defense system, Inslaw should be owed in excess of half a billion
dollars.
Some politicians and journalists privately, with only a few
publicly, have supported Inslaw's position that the government
stole their PROMIS software, but almost all have been unwilling
to really investigate and go public with the real facts. Seymour
Hersh, one of a few to attempt to get the whole Inslaw story out,
recently researched and proposed an article for the New York
Times Magazine, Vanity Fair, and Atlantic Monthly, but
unfortunately they all passed.
Even a House investigation and retired Federal Judge Nicholas J.
Bua's grand jury 1993 investigation in Chicago didn't get to the
bottom of this government scandal, possibly because of the
magnitude of the situation. Attorney General Barr appointed Bua
as a Special Counsel, but he was really a "dependent counsel."
Even though Chuck Hayes, who secured many of the witnesses (such
as Ari Ben-Menashe) did testify, Michael Riconosciuto along with
many [other] witnesses didn't in person or at all. The Judge was
sued for not conducting a proper investigation by Chicago
investigative journalist Sherman Skolnick and Michael
Riconosciuto. Bua submitted a "whitewashed" report to Attorney
General Reno, who turned it over to the White House who did
nothing... except send Inslaw information in a secure envelope to
Vince Foster shortly before his death.
Debra Gorham, former secretary to Vince Foster and William
Kennedy, her prior boss, secretly testified before Senate
Whitewater Committee on 6/23/95. In addition to Webster Hubbell,
William Kennedy was another Rose Law Firm partner who resigned at
the White House under a scandal and, also as Jackson Stephen's
attorney in 1984, he filed incomplete information with the
Federal Reserve about Stephens's family holding in Worthen Bank
(New York Times 5/9/95 "Fed Ends Inquiry Into an Arkansas
Family").
In her confidential testimony, Debra Gorham disclosed a key point
wherein she stated that Vince Foster gave her two NSA 1-inch
ringed binders (Ambrose Evans-Pritchard's London Sunday Telegraph
8/6 article and Debra Gorham's excerpted confidential
transcripts) which she put in Bernard Nussbaum's safe. Debra
Gorham described one binder as blue; it may well have been our
nuclear missile launch codes which control the entire U.S.
missile defense system -- the ultimate power. These codes access
any missile and can launch it wherever programmed.
Also, at a later public Whitewater Senate hearing on 8/1/95,
Senator Faircloth's aide confirmed that Debra Gorham was
instructed by her counsel to say, "I do not recall," when he
passed a hurriedly written note before her to respond to the
Senator's question, "Did Foster ever get any documents on
Systematics or Inslaw?" In direct contradiction to her sworn
testimony, through a confidential friend, Gorham admitted
receiving and even reading some of a secure letter on Inslaw from
Webster Hubbell. Although it might be hard to prove, since she
only admitted through her friend that she was familiar with
Inslaw from the previous Washington, D.C. law firm employer,
there can be no doubt that Gorham lied to Congress about not
receiving a letter on Inslaw.
Chuck Hayes and other highly placed confidential sources have
stated that Vince Foster, as a NSA secret operative since the
late '70s and a partner at Rose Law Firm, worked on secret and
clandestine matters at Systematics (owned by Jackson Stephens).
Larry Nichols, a former Arkansas friend of Clinton's, has stated
that a Systematics employee, who is afraid of being fired,
confirmed to him that Foster came in shortly before his death,
flashing NSA credentials, and demanded that this person run a
secret program for him, which he did. After Foster's death, this
same Systematics employee asked Larry Nichols if anything he did
for Vince Foster could have been a reason for his death. In a
significant development, Rep. Leach, Chairman of the Whitewater
hearings, may be prepared to subpoena this person and therefore
force him to testify when the hearings commence around the end of
September, but don't count on him being called or showing up.
[...to be continued...]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

140
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn09-98.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 9 Num. 98
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES OF MEETINGS/CONVERSATIONS ON INSLAW & FOSTERGATE (10/21/95)
=================================================================
By "Mr. Mercedes" (Pseudonym)
-----------------------------
[...continued...]
[CN: The rest of this essay, as typed by CN, omits portions of
the original which seemed redundant. Also, the claims made by
"Mr. Mercedes" are his own; much of what he says is beyond my own
knowledge. Be assured, however, that I have spoken with "Mr.
Mercedes" many times and that he is not a dilettante in these
matters.]
In addition to acting as an NSA agent, James Norman stated that
Vince Foster was also selling NSA and other high-level U.S.
government and military secrets to Israel's Mossad with the
assistance of another former Rose Law Firm partner, Hillary
Clinton (she was the attorney of record for none other than
Systematics once in 1978 and later in (1981 or 82?))
James Norman stated that Dee Dee Myers, former White House Press
Secretary, reportedly set up Foster by getting him out of the
White House where he was killed in a not very professional and
hurriedly arranged mafia-style hit, made to look like a suicide.
Her recent drunk driving arrest was a cover for an intense CIA
interrogation about her involvement in Foster's death.
In a completely different, but interrelated vein of the
Inslaw/PROMIS situation, CNN broadcast an excerpt of a
one-and-a-half hour taped interview on 12/12/91 with Canadian
John Belton who described how former California Gov. Reagan's
Secretary of Health, Financial News Network founder/former owner
and secret intelligence operative, Earl W. Brian, was involved in
funding October Surprise. Additionally, Belton told CNN just how
Earl Brian defrauded Nesbitt Thompson, the Canadian investment
company where Belton worked, of $50 million through stock
manipulation of Brian's public companies. Despite the
significance of Belton's CNN interview, which aired worldwide and
even with front page coverage in Canadian newspapers, there's
been no coverage in the U.S.
James Norman stated that Caspar Weinberger, Forbes' Chairman
Emeritus, has also been implicated [by Chuck Hayes checking] out
encrypted code number found by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Barry
Seal's car trunk after he was murdered by Colombian hitmen when
DOJ/DEA hung him out to dry. Evans-Pritchard gave Norman the
number, who in turn had Hayes run it and see who and what he
could come up with. Hayes found that the number turned out to be
a secret Swiss bank account for Caspar Weinberger through which
he pulled out several million dollars.
Some sources even believe it was possible that the whole
NSA/Foster operation was a policy decision under Reagan/Bush to
pay back Israel for their help with Iraq by providing them with
our nuclear missile defense system. It is unknown if Caspar
Weinberger had applied any pressure to kill Norman's story at
Forbes, but he certainly feels that his continuing investigation
into Weinberger's involvement in the "Fostergate" story was the
real reason for his being fired.
Other journalists who were fired for writing or attempting to
write stories on Vince Foster/Inslaw include Christopher Ruddy
formerly at New York Post (1/27/94 article, "Doubts Raised Over
Foster's Suicide," and 2/10/94 article, "Fumbling Feds Change
Story on Foster's 'Suicide'" and Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
9/20/95 "Police Failed to Find Keys to Foster's Car at Park" and
9/26/95 "Clinton Security Chief's Murder Still Unsolved") and
Tony Kimery (Media Bypass 9/95, "Penetration: Fostergate II"
follow-up to Norman's 8/95 article and upcoming 10/2/95 Insight
Magazine article on the NSA's Fin-CEN, Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network) at a Washington, D.C. wire service.
Since Presidential hopeful Bob Dole is reported to have Jackson
Stephens as his Campaign Finance Chairman, even if he doesn't
have a secret Swiss bank account like many of his Congressional
colleagues, the damage to his campaign could be terminal if and
when this scandal breaks and he is linked with one of the central
figures with [Stephens'] Systematics company.
Quite possibly, since many are involved in both parties and
independent counsel Ken Starr appears to have been involved in
some way, early on in the Inslaw matter, recusing himself as
Solicitor General, nothing about this Vince Foster scandal may
ever come out in either the House or Senate Whitewater hearings
or Starr's investigation and final report if they all can help
keep it buried with Vince Foster, especially if there is no
serious media scrutiny and reporting.
If nothing is done we can almost certainly expect a huge
"blowback" as described by Robert Friedman (New Yorker Magazine
3/17/95, "The CIA's Jihad"), a term which describes how the CIA's
covert ops many times wind up causing more problems than their
ops are worth. One of these CIA "blowbacks" presumably resulted
in the bombing of the World Trade Center after the CIA trained,
armed, and financed Arab terrorists and Afghan rebels to fight
our former enemy, the Russian occupying army.
Hopefully though, sooner or later serious journalists will decide
to truly investigate this story; only then will "Fostergate" and
Inslaw be prime time news, despite all the efforts of government
officials, business leaders, and major media, to avoid, suppress
and/or write dis- or misinformation on this blockbuster story.
Who knows, maybe Safire had a point when he wrote, "Sometimes
conspiracy theories uncover conspiracy." But poet Robert Frost
really said it best: "...But I have PROMISes to keep, and miles
to go before I sleep."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9

47
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-01.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 1
=====================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CfD ==> CN Editorial
by Brian Francis Redman, Editor-in-chief
I am not a machine. Conspiracy information does not visit me like
the rhythm of the tides. At times, there is an avalanche of vital
information. At times, there's not much. Yet, due to the
tyrannical framework of my invention, "Conspiracy for the Day," I
have put myself in a strait-jacket from which I must emit *1*
conspiracy *every* day.
I have dodged this stricture somewhat by sending out "Special
Editions" when there is an avalanche. Still, due to the nature of
the series (Conspiracy for the *D*A*Y*), I have been at the mercy
of my own Frankenstein. Like a robot, I am programmed to emit *1*
conspiracy *each* day.
Can you see what I mean? Can you see that my own invention has
turned on me?
So I am renaming the series "Conspiracy Nation". By doing that, I
will have more flexibility in my life. I will still be finishing
up the Linda Thompson interview, the Scott/Posner JFK debate, and
the Texe Marrs series. I will also be posting new info as it
becomes available. But starting now, it won't necessarily be
every day.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


81
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-02.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 2
=====================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
THE TRUE HORROR OF BIGFOOT
by Brian Francis Redman, Editor-in-chief, Conspiracy Nation
Copyright (c) 1994 -- All Rights Reserved
The true horror of "bigfoot" is danced around by the cautious,
creeping pedants. Faced with the undeniability of the 1967 film
footage, the bolder of the academic breed have deigned to cast a
critical eye on this puzzle. And what do they say? They say it is
an ape from Southeast Asia that wandered over here aeons ago.
But look again at the film footage. That is no ape that walks and
then turns to cast a backwards glance. Nor is it human. So what
is it?
Oscar Maerth, in his book *The Beginning Was The End*, tells the
horrifying tale of just what the "bigfoot," "sasquatch," "yeti,"
is.
The bigfoot fascinates us because we know there is a mystery
there about *us*. Yet the truth of bigfoot is not flattering to
us as a species.
So what does Maerth say? Before I answer, let me tell you
something: As I delve into the labyrinth of conspiracies and
suppressed information, there are times when I come across truth
that is even more than I wanted. Normally I want "the real dirt,"
"the lowdown." And the closer I get, the more I thirst. But there
are times when I shrink back in horror as I see that the face
peering back at me takes on the form of a *me* that I can't bear
to look at.
As Nietzche said, "The deeper you look into the abyss, the deeper
the abyss looks into you."
So what does Maerth say? For one thing, he offers his own
interpretation of the Biblical tale of Adam and Eve. What oh what
could that forbidden fruit be back there in the Garden of Eden?
What sort of "fruit" is it that the eating of which "makes you
wise?" An apple? Or is the "apple" of the Bible a cover-up for
what was really eaten? In place of "apple" or "fruit," how about
-- *the raw brain of members of your own species*. The apes,
code-named "Adam" and "Eve" became addicted to raw brain of other
apes. They became so addicted that they began to murder each
other in order to satisfy their new-found appetite. Eating the
brain of their fellow beings was the *Original Sin*.
The Bible says that "Adam" and "Eve" became aware of their
nakedness. How about this, instead: A side-effect from eating the
"fruit of knowledge" was that they lost their fur.
So where does "bigfoot" enter in to all this? Answer: Some of the
"Adams" and "Eves" saw that there were harmful side-effects
associated with their recently acquired habit of cannibalism. So
they stopped midway between the unnatural change from ape to man.
These "bigfoot" saw, before it was too late, the harmful effect
of the brain eating frenzy. Yet their brethren, our ancestors,
continued their savage diet. To save themselves from being killed
and eaten, the "bigfoot" hid itself from man and continues to do
so to this day.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


189
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-03.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 3
=====================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[CN Editor -- The local all volunteer radio station, WEFT 90.1
FM, has a 1-hour show at 10 A.M. on Saturday mornings called
"News From Neptune." The following is a partial transcript of
their June 4, 1994 broadcast. Co-hosts are Paul "The Truth" Muth,
and Carl Estabrook.]
MUTH:... what you thought the most egregious misrepresentation of
America's role. Actually, I was thinking more of a discussion of
post-war... something we return to in... our namesake for the
show, "News From Neptune," Noam Chomsky, says it ought to start
with some of the betrayals of the movements that fought against
Hitler.
ESTABROOK: Absolutely.
MUTH: Whether the Truman Doctrine in Greece -- Greek partisans --
the deals with the mafiosi in the south of France, in Marseilles,
where the left people who fought against Nazis were betrayed and
beaten by thugs.
ESTABROOK: Absolutely. No, you're right, Paul. I mean the myth
making this week around D-Day has just been remarkable. And I
don't know what I find more appalling: the myth making itself or
the general ignorance -- the sort of inchoate recognition on the
part of a lot of people who are listening to this that it *is*
myth making and therefore they shouldn't pay any attention to it.
And an awful lot of people are still going to be sadly pressed if
you ask them what D-Day was or what the situation was 50 years
ago that is the occasion for all this rhetorical excess that
we're hearing from both the news media and from our chief
magistrate [Clinton] who is running around England at the moment,
apparently, excessing rhetorically.
I don't know. I mean ignorance as a defense against propaganda,
you know, is a counsel of despair, it seems to me. But that's
what we're dealing with.
MUTH: I was dismayed by the blessing of the new Italian
government...
[CN Editor -- In Italy, so-called "Neo Fascists" have recently
gained control of the government. 50 years ago, we were fighting
World War II against these same sorts of people. Where is
Clinton's first stop for the 50-year D-Day carnival? Italy. Who
does he meet with first? Fascists.]
...What was the line, uh...
ESTABROOK: Yes!
MUTH: "Well a lot of political parties have their origins in less
than wholesome..." I don't know.
ESTABROOK: Maybe he's talking about the Democratic party and its
support for slavery [pre-American Civil War] in this country.
MUTH: I suppose. There is that reference, I guess, that's sort of
a defense of his remark. [CN Editor -- Apparently Clinton made
some sort of remark, in the context of his meeting with the
Italian "Neo-Fascists," as some sort of an excuse for the
absurdity of his situation.] But the Neo-Nazis...
ESTABROOK: I mean, it is... The irony is very great, Paul. I mean
for him to be embracing the leader of a government that includes
a fascist... and all this "neo-fascist" talk just means that
these fascists weren't born when the... when Mussolini was
running Italy.
It is an important irony, an important contradiction, because it
shows up the falseness of most of our accounts of World War II. I
mean, if some accounts are to be believed, what World War II was
primarily about was it was some sort of a brawl between Hitler
and the B'nai B'rith. And it seems to me that it's much more
important to try to see what World War II *was* about and to see
that the United States never went to war to protect Jews, it
never went to war to overthrow Hitler -- the U.S. was perfectly
complacent with the Hitler government throughout the '30s. It
didn't go to war for any of these "defense of Freedoms" that have
been talked about. Remember: The war had been on for several
years; at least 2 years if you talk about Europe and many more if
you talk about Japanese expansion into China. The war had been on
for several years before the U.S. got involved in it. And its
motive for getting into the war had nothing to do with freedom or
oppressed groups within the Reich. What it had to do with was the
fact that a military base belonging to the U.S. was attacked in
the Pacific and that 2 Capitalist powers struggled over which was
to control the business of the Pacific. We won.
MUTH: Well, but that does bring up the question of what was the
motive in Europe, though. I thought you were going to say... I
mean, the precipitating thing, Pearl Harbor [September 7th, just
ask George Bush -- CN Editor], I think we can set aside. Anything
could have precipitated. So it's not, that's not a major causal
thing. The latter is just the fighting over the Capitalist
spoils. But that's true in Europe as well.
ESTABROOK: Well exactly. You're quite right about that. I'm not
sure I agree that anything could have precipitated it. I mean, it
seems to me that it was the [economic] struggle between the U.S.
and Japan that the U.S. was essentially winning. And that the
Japanese struck out against militarily that produced the military
confrontation in the Pacific. The U.S. had trammelled up the
Japanese economy in the Pacific and was doing its best to do so.
And it was the Japanese strike, military strike, against that
that led the U.S. into the war.
The alliance of Japan and Germany turned our attention then to
the... to Europe. Because the real motive of the U.S. in Europe
was not particularly, or not immediately, for the defeat of
Germany. What the U.S. was most interested in, in Europe, was the
British empire. Who was going to control the colonial empires of
the declining Capitalist states of Europe when the war ended? The
U.S. was sure it was going to be that sort of "residuary legatee"
of 19th century colonialism; that the British empire was going to
be ours. The Germans were fighting to see that that empire would
be theirs, that they would have an economic control over that,
over that empire. We won that one, too. That's the reason we were
in Iran. That's the reason we were in Vietnam. I mean, the
question of the Second World War could be summarized as "The War
of British Succession in Europe"; who was going to succeed to the
British empire. We won that one, too.
[...]
[Still Estabrook speaking]:
And I think the understanding of what the war was about, and the
understanding (as you suggested earlier) of what the real outcome
of the war was, seems to me to be vital and against the
mythology.
To take just one example: *Time* magazine this week has a picture
of Dwight David Eisenhower on the front of it with the legend,
"The Man Who Beat Hitler." Well, that's very interesting. Bertolt
Brecht wrote a famous poem. "The Remarks of a Worker Who Reads"
contains the lines:
Caesar conquered Gaul.
(Didn't he even have a cook with him?)
So "The Man Who Beat Hitler" is... at once, falls under Brecht's
quite legitimate stricture.
There's another issue, too. For all this talk about the invasion
of France on the 6th of June, 1944, by 150,000 troops (a minority
of whom, by the way, were Americans), um, for all the talk about
this, the notion grows in American circles that *that* was what
overthrew Nazi-ism. Well, in fact, what overthrew Nazi-ism was
the Russian army. Even *after* D-Day, from June 6, 1944 to May 8,
1945 -- from D-Day to the very end of the war -- the majority of
German troops were in the east, not in the west. Even after all
the Allied armies had moved into France and so forth -- all the
British and American armies (Anglo-Saxon armies, we probably
should say) had moved into western Europe -- the majority of
German troops were still in the east because the German's knew
quite well [that] the real threat came from the east. And it was
when the eastern front crumbled, when the Russian army -- at
immense cost, cost of 20 million war dead -- when the Russian
army finally moved into Berlin, that the war was over.
Now this is not to say that what was going on, the difficulties
in the western half of Europe, weren't serious difficulties for
the Reich. They certainly were. But if you ask, "Who won the
Second World War?" (the question), the short answer is not
Eisenhower, "The Man Who Beat Hitler," but the Red army. It
should have a picture of General Zhukoff, or worse yet, Joe
Stalin, on the front of *Time* magazine if you wanted to be...
even if you wanted to buy this way of talking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


133
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-04.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 4
=====================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[From an interview with Linda Thompson on the *For the People*
radio show, Feb. 11, 1994. Host is Chuck Harder.]
[Continued...]
CHUCK HARDER: Our guest is Linda Thompson.
So now Linda, where we're at here is... By the way, let me just
mention again to the folks that the name of this tape is "Waco,
the Big Lie Continues"?
LINDA THOMPSON: Uh-hum. [Affirmative] "Waco II" is the simplest
way...
HARDER: Yeah.
THOMPSON: ...to call it. Everybody's calling it "Waco II."
HARDER: All right. And again, if you want to get a copy call 1-
800-888-9999. If busy, keep trying. It's $19.95 and shipping and
handling.
Um, let's continue on here. And, and let's now go to... uh, Bob
Ricks has said, "Anybody who comes out is going to be shot." Uh,
I don't remember seeing that in the press. Of course, my life has
been a blur. But, uh, did the press pick that up?
THOMPSON: Yeah. It came across the AP [Associated Press] wires.
But it was not widely disseminated.
HARDER: O.K.
THOMPSON: You didn't hear it on ABC, CBS, CNN and so forth. And
of course, we're listening with, you know, "jaded ears" at that
point. We, we are specifically listening for things like that. So
we caught it, we kept it, and yes, they said it. They can't get
out of that.
And in the Department of Justice report they *admit* that they
threw grenades at 'em if they came out. It says it very plainly
in there. In fact, I think they admit, uh, the part about Bob
Ricks saying that, in the report... But can't remember that one
specifically. But I do remember, they admit "flash-bang" grenades
being thrown at the people.
Uh, they admit that they were... basically, they've admitted --
in the Department of Justice and ATF reports -- they've admitted
everything in "Waco I" except for the flame-throwing tank. And
they lied to try to explain that one. They do not try to claim
that the tank that you see in "Waco I" with the flames coming out
of it is not real. They did have an expert from the University of
Maryland analyze it, and one at Fort Harrison. We've had an FBI
forensics expert analyze it. *No one* has tried to claim that we
altered the tape, or that it's not flame. They've tried to
explain it away by saying they don't know what it is. And they
said... Janet Reno stood up and said, [mimicking Reno] "Well we
had CEV-I and CEV-II out there." (Now she's referring to the
tanks: "Combat Engineer Vehicle," that's what CEV stands for.)
[mimicking Reno] "We had CEV-I and CEV-II out there. And the
investigators have inspected those. And they don't have any
equipment to shoot flames. And there's no charring on them." As
if that's an explanation.
Well on page 49 of the Department of Justice report it says CEV-
II broke down and the tank crew got another tank that was not
equipped to inject tear gas. She also does not mention the other,
almost dozen, tanks that were out there *besides* CEV-I and II.
So these are the kinds of things that they do. And the reason
that they're... when you see these public officials on TV, they
are telling you truth in what they *say* because they're afraid
of voice stress analysis. So when Janet Reno stood up and talked
about "CEV-I and II," that much of it is true. But she's creating
a false impression in your mind that she's addressing the tank
that you see in our tape -- and she's not!
HARDER: In other words, it is an "error by omission" or a "lie by
omission."
THOMPSON: Yeah. Smoke and mirrors.
HARDER: O.K.
THOMPSON: They're very good at it.
HARDER: All right. Now, what's going on with the trial right now?
We don't see anything on the national press. Yes, we get wire
services here. We do have some informants at the trial.
But we're gonna take a quick half-hour break here -- you know,
break at the half-hour for our local stations for 3 minutes --
but when we come back, I'd like you to give us an idea of the
following (and maybe if we just make a little note here): Number
1, What has come out? What has the government admitted, number 1,
so far at the trial? O.K.? What has the government admitted. Uh,
we know already that they've admitted that had David Koresh met
them at the front door and said, "Hi. Nice day, isn't it? What do
ya got for me?", that the rest of the team still would have
busted in. We know that, correct?
THOMPSON: That's absolutely right.
HARDER: O.K. So let's go over, when we come back, What has the
government admitted? (Number 1.) And number 2, What's going on
from your perspective? And what do you think will happen to this
trial? And then, What's next?
Stay with us, everybody. We'll be right back with Linda Thompson.
(to be continued)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


106
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-05.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 5
=====================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[CN -- Continuation of "How To Survive the Coming Money Crash,"
from an audiotape by someone named Texe Marrs. Although the talk
is circa 1991, it still has relevant info.]
Will there be money in coming years in the social security fund
to handle the cost of medicare and retirement for those who've
been guaranteed it for many years? Maybe there will be. Maybe
there won't be. It all depends on the future of this economy.
It is a *fact*, though, that there has been a sham and a scandal
at the highest ranks of government to defraud American taxpayers
by taking what they thought were insurance premiums into the
social security fund -- taking this money to pay off a government
deficit that is huge and growing, because our congressmen, our
representatives and senators, spend and spend and spend and
spend.
And now there are many other areas of the economy that are
showing cracks: Our giant insurance companies -- will they go
under? It could be. Will the retirement system? I could give you
so many examples of retirement systems. Do you *know* what the
management of your retirement fund is (if you're in such a plan)?
Where do they put their money? Where do they invest? Is it in
junk bonds? Is it in inferior stock? Is it in shaky real estate
investments?
I was reading recently and doing some study on the teacher's
state retirement fund to the state of Texas. Once thought to be
very, very plush; financially secure... but they went out and
invested in real estate. And now tens and tens and tens of
millions of dollars of real estate -- invested in by the
teacher's retirement fund of the state of Texas -- has gone
bankrupt and foreclosed. Will those teachers of the state of
Texas have a retirement fund when they do retire someday? Will
they receive the monthly payments they've been "guaranteed"? We
simply don't know. Not only in the state of Texas, but throughout
this United States.
And even as the economic crisis looms, and we have our banking
problems, and savings and loans closing their doors, and
incredible unemployment rising, with job layoffs... Sears laid
off 24,000 employees recently, *Sears* department stores.
Recently the major 3 automakers announced 17 plant closings. And
yet, President Bush and the Congress agreed to a tax increase.
{1}. A time when people are losing jobs, they're worried about
their savings, they're worried about our social security fund
being robbed... Will their health and life insurance plans go
under? Their premiums be lost?
At the same time these worries are besetting people, their taxes
are being raised in what the government calls "tax reform" -- I
think this is a very frightening situation. We *are* on the
threshhold of a horrible financial crisis. What's more, I am
confident in stating that it *has* been engineered and
orchestrated *behind the scenes*... behind the scenes, by what
can only be called an elite group of *ruthless* men:
international financiers, bankers, politicians. A money crash
will give these evil men the opportunity to usher in their
planned New World Order.
Now in my book *Millenium* I talk about this plan for a New World
Order, a plan for a new money to be issued and then later, a
cashless society, so that Bible prophecy will be fulfilled:
Revelation 13. Someday, no man will be able to buy nor sell
unless he has The Mark in his forehead or in his right hand *or*
the name or the number of The Beast. We know that number: 666.
Now the steps toward a one-world government, a New World Order, a
one-world economy -- the steps toward even a one-world, "unity"
type religion -- are basically cemented together by money. Money
is the glue that holds the whole cracking apparatus together.
It's almost like a crystal, glass globe that has fallen from the
top of the Empire State building onto the concrete far, far
below. And it's cracked. It's held together not by baling wire
but by $100 bills -- or I should say, Marks and Yen.
(to be continued)
---------------------------<< Notes >>---------------------------
{1} We have also now had another tax increase under Clinton. --
CN Editor.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


134
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-06.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 6
=====================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
RESOLVED: President Kennedy was killed as the result of a
conspiracy.
[Continuation of my transcription of a radio debate which took
place in the Fall of 1993 between Peter Dale Scott and Gerald
Posner. Today, Mr. Scott gives his rebuttal to Mr. Posner's
opening remarks.]
MODERATOR: Thank you, Mr. Posner. Mr. Scott, you have 6 minutes
for rebuttal.
PETER DALE SCOTT: Our audience has just heard the kind of people
that Mr. Posner believes in: The KGB and (I'll come back to this
later) Marina Oswald.
Marina Oswald, for whom, by the way, I have great compassion at
that time, was being so obviously coerced by the very people who
were interviewing her at that time, that she changed her stories
repeatedly at that time. It was quite obvious she was trying to
tell what the government wanted her to tell in order to avoid
being deported. The Warren Commission knew this, and wrote a memo
in February of 1964 saying, "Marina has repeatedly lied on
matters of serious concern to this commission." And it's very
revealing, I think, that when they knew this in February, when
they came to write their report in June and July, they had such
trouble linking Oswald to the gun and to the act of shooting
*anyone* -- let alone General Walker -- that they had to rely on
the testimony of a liar. And uh so, unfortunately, does Mr.
Posner.
Mr. Posner believes in the KGB. Let me tell you, the readers,
that he believes even more in the CIA. And, in fact, [he] tells
us that he got certain things from the CIA. He says, for example,
Mr. George De Mohrenschildt (a friend of Oswald's with obvious
intelligence background -- although he had other aspects to his
background as well), he says, "had no intelligence connection to
the CIA." How do we know? Mr. Posner says, "Because the CIA has
told us so."
But if Mr. Posner would do what I do, which is to look at the
documents, he would see that despite what he [De Mohrenschildt]
told people, when he left Dallas in '63, he went to Washington.
He took part in a meeting with CIA agents and more importantly,
Army Intelligence agents, before going to Haiti as a business...
whatever it was... but certainly *about* Haiti. Since then, a CIA
contract agent has said it was about the overthrow of the
government in Haiti. And this is the sort of thing you won't find
in Mr. Posner's book.
I object very much to that long quote from my book, which was
about how many *enemies* Kennedy had in 1963. I certainly did not
say that they all killed the President. I said on the contrary
that... You know, so many people think that I'm saying the
President was killed because of his Vietnam policy. And I was
trying, on the contrary, to "open it out," to say that there were
many coalitions that were angry with Kennedy in 1963 -- the joint
chiefs and the military being an important one. But organized
crime, the teamsters, (and you've heard the list) also... But I'm
certainly not saying that they all killed the President. I'm
saying don't *misread* me to think that I have named the killers.
And I said, in fact, at the beginning of the book, Mr. Posner (if
you'd started on page 1), that I do *not* in this book try to say
who the killers are!
So now, finally, General Walker... I have written about General
Walker in all of my preceding books. And the bullets that you and
I have both talked about -- which were too mangled to be
identified in April when it was shot at General Walker, but
somehow has become identifiable in November of 1963 and was
identified as having been shot from Lee Harvey Oswald's
Mannlicher-Carcano [Italian rifle]. You didn't mention, Mr.
Posner, that (I hope I get this the right way around), that in
April it had been identified as copper-jacketed but by the time
it was November it was now steel-jacketed. So that that bullet is
just one example of the kind of things that "happened" to
evidence that were kept in the hands of the Dallas police or
later, in the FBI, and which are, for me, a major part of the
case that this was a conspiracy involving people both outside the
government shooting the President, and also people inside the
government guaranteeing an absolutely sure-fire case. That the
truth would be so explosive and the "phase 1" stories, as I call
them, of communist conspiracy would be so threatening for an
unnecessary war, that all kinds of people would be coerced to
accept what I call the "phase 2" story -- that Oswald acted
alone. A story equally false, but not as likely to lead to the
death, unnecessary death, of thousands of lives.
So, it is true that you focus on the life of Oswald. I believe if
you were to write a book about the murder of Trotsky, you would
probably write a whole book about the character and the
personality defects of the gunman who killed Trotsky! But surely
it's important to go *back* from the case and look at the links
between that gunman and Stalin back in Moscow.
And I'm not, I think by nature, someone who begins with a
conspiracy theory. But having looked for so long at the Kennedy
assassination -- and particularly at the anomalies in the
relationship between Oswald and the FBI, between Ruby and the
Dallas police, and then the concerted effort to say that these
people were "loners" when if we know *anything*, that's exactly
what they weren't. That we absolutely are forced to look beyond
the personality of Oswald in this case, and try to fit
together... And it's more than a conspiracy. It isn't a lot of
people who could have been identified, it's a...
[Moderator interrupts and tells Mr. Scott that his 6 minutes have
expired.]
MODERATOR: Thank you, Mr. Scott. Mr. Posner, you have 6 minutes
for your rebuttal.
(to be continued)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


118
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-07.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 7
=====================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[CN Editor -- I cannot vouch for the accuracy of *all* of the
following. It may or may not be true, I just don't know.]
[The following is a transcript of a recorded phone message put
out by a group in Chicago called "Citizens' Committee to Clean Up
the Courts." (312) 731-1100 and (312) 731-1505.]
Hi! Sherman Skolnick, Citizens' Committee to Clean Up the Courts
[CCCC], 9800 Oglesby.
From time to time the monopoly press plays up scenes from World
War II; sometimes, on the anniversary of some event. They just
show American soldiers shooting German soldiers and vice-versa.
Emotional news for those that were there or are interested.
Never, *ever*, mentioned are the financial dirty deals that *led*
to the war.
In his book *Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler*, Anthony
Sutton(?) documents how American big business financed the Nazis
-- including General Electric, General Motors, Ford Motors,
DuPont and others. The purpose was to form a supposed bulwark
against the Soviets.
In another book, about the Bolsheviks, Sutton shows how Wall
Street also financed the rise of Lenin. The ultra-rich (as seldom
mentioned) financed both sides... from before the war, Standard Oil
and the Rockefellers, with I.G. Farben, the German chemical
cartel. Among the terms: that Standard Oil would not compete with
Farben patents on synthetic rubber. And so, when the U.S. went to
war against Hitler, the Rockefellers refused to produce synthetic
rubber. The rubber supply was cut off by the Japanese attack in
the Pacific. So, a false shortage was created by the
Rockefellers. Goodyear had to rush up *their* synthetic rubber
development.
Through neutral countries, the Rockefellers continued, all during
the war, to share patent royalties with the Nazi Farben --
*Treason*, according to the U.S. Constitution. The Kennedy family
shared in that treason, as shown in Joseph Borken's(?) book, *The
Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben*. Also, Gunther Riemond's(?)
book, *Patents for Hitler*.
Because of the financial interlock, Allied bombers were warned
*not* to bomb Farben's war chemical plants all during the war.
And, at the end of the war, those plants remained 92% intact. A
top U.S. military officer documented this: Richard Sasooly(?) in
his book, *I.G. Farben*.
Founding father Joseph P. Kennedy, the pro-Nazi U.S. ambassador
to London, was a big shot in the U.S. movie industry. He ordered
movie script writers not to mention the Jews taken to the
concentration camps -- as documented in Ben Hecht's book, *Child
of the Century*.
The infamous, pro-Nazi Mullen(?) family of Pittsburgh, owners of
Aluminum Company of America, held back essential aluminum
production at the onset of the war -- nearly strangling U.S.
bomber and fighter production. Their treason was shared by the
pro-Nazi *Chicago Tribune*, which gave out U.S. military secrets
during the war -- as shown in George Seldeson's(?) book, *Facts
and Fascism*.
Just before the war, Mexico expropriated oil fields supposedly
owned by the U.S. and the British big business. [CN -- Mexican
President Cardenas nationalized the Mexican oil industry in the
1930s.] Result? A false shortage was created by the Rockefellers
-- for revenge, refusing to buy Mexican oil all during the war.
At the end of World War II, the Jesuits and the Vatican helped
Nazi war criminals escape to the United States and Argentina --
as shown in [unclear] book, *Aftermath*. Also Clarence Lasby's
book, *Project Paperclip* [CN -- He may mean *Operation
Paperclip*]. Some of the Nazis ended up as professors at the
University of Chicago.
The ultra-rich -- the U.S., British, and Dutch, and the German
aristocracy -- financially built up Hitler. The uninformed,
ordinary, working people on *both* sides suffered the
consequences. And, since the ultra-rich own the mass media, they
are silent about all this.
Call up the news fakers and tell them to stop kidding us.
In Chicago, see us on cable tv, channel 21, 9 pm [cst] most
Monday evenings.
Play it again: What They're Not Telling You About Dan
Rostenskowski. (312) 731-1505.
New message Wednesday; we change it several times a week.
Donations appreciated. Citizen's Committee to Clean Up the
Courts, 9800 South Oglesby, Chicago, [Illinois] 60617. For the
latest on courts, banks, espionage agencies, political
assassinations, and the news media. On 24 hours a day.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


224
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-08.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,224 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 8
=====================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[From an interview with Linda Thompson on the *For the People*
radio show, Feb. 11, 1994. Host is Chuck Harder.]
[Continued...]
CHUCK HARDER: We're back. We're talking to Linda Thompson. She's
an attorney. She is the producer of what we call "Waco II",
"Waco, the Big Lie Continues".
Uh, now, what has the government admitted, Linda? What have they
admitted in trial that you have solid evidence of that has not
been out in the press?
LINDA THOMPSON: Well, we need to cover some of the background on
the trial first to understand what's going on.
HARDER: O.K. Sure.
THOMPSON: Walter Smith is the judge. And this is going on in
federal district court, which means it's a federal court as
distinguished from Randy Weaver's situation.
Walter Smith was the judge in Waco. Now Dennis Greene is his
magistrate. Now magistrates do not have the full power of a
judge. They're usually picked by a judge; the judge picks his own
magistrate.
Dennis Greene is the man who signed the search warrant
originally, and has been working hand in hand with Bill
Johnstone, who is the U.S. attorney there. Between them, they
have a long record of having some of the highest rates of gun
prosecutions of anyplace in the country, right in Waco, between
Dennis Greene and Bill Johnstone.
Now Walter Smith, then, is the judge that sealed the search
warrant originally. He is the man who had secret arraignments of
the Branch Davidians (which is illegal. That's like the "star
chamber" back in England.) When these people were brought in and
arraigned, he held it in secret.
Walter Smith, in his first 7 orders about the Branch Davidians,
back in March last year [i.e. in March 1993], called them
criminals! Himself, in his order, he referred to these people as
criminals. Now that is, by itself (as a defense attorney), was
basis to get rid of Walter Smith as the judge in this case. So
it's very, very odd that no one got him off this case with
motions and arguments and so forth.
HARDER: Hang on a minute. Could it be that he put that in there
so that if this thing goes one way or another, somebody can call
for a mistrial or what have you?
THOMPSON: Possibly. But you've got a problem when the defense
doesn't *challenge* it, it's not the basis for an appeal. Unless
another attorney comes in and tries to use the fact that the
attorneys themselves didn't challenge it. But anyway, it would
[unclear] if somebody would have challenged it and lost, they
could appeal it. But secondly, what else he did, he is the man...
most of these Davidians have appointed attorneys... court-
appointed attorneys that are paid by the government.
HARDER: Yeah?
THOMPSON: Yeah. And Walter Smith hand picked every one of those
attorneys. So all of the attorneys have been picked by the judge.
Then he cut their salaries in half. Now I can tell you: The
appointed jobs do not pay very well. Very few successful
attorneys, anymore, take appointed cases -- for no reason other
than the fact that you *lose* money taking those cases because
you've got to keep your office open while you're being paid this
pittance of money to do a very complex case. So, by cutting the
salaries in half, any of the attorneys that *were* inclined to be
good and do their job couldn't.
Now then he transferred the case to San Antonio. That happens to
be where the government's special prosecutor is from. And it also
happens to be where the government's chief witness for the FBI,
Jeff Jamar, is from. So that makes it very convenient for the
government, less expensive, less hassle. And it causes a *lot* of
trouble for the defense attorneys, who have to commute and
essentially set up an office in San Antonio. Now they're going to
have to fund their own expenses for all of that at the time that
they're being paid virtually nothing!
Now doing any kind of defense on a case this complex is going to
be *extremely* expensive because you've gotta pay a lot of
people. You've gotta take depositions of a lot of witnesses. That
costs about $400 to $1,000 apiece. There's a lot of time
involved. You need a lot of assistants to do it. They don't have
that available to 'em. They can't *do* a good job. Even if they
want to, they can't.
HARDER: Well where's the American Civil Liberties Union in this?
THOMPSON: Well... That's another story. We'll get to them in a
minute...
HARDER: All right.
THOMPSON: ...get down to San Antonio to do this trial and you've
got seven... You've got the attorneys that were all picked by
Walter Smith. Walter Smith is still on the case, even though he's
transferred it to San Antonio, he is still the judge.
We get to trial. *He* picked the jury pool and he hand picked all
the jurors. And then he kept the jurors anonymous. You can't know
the identities of each of the jurors. No one can.
Then he put a gag order on all of the attorneys and he hand
picked the press that would be allowed in to cover the story.
He's only allowed 5 members of the press into the trial to cover
the story. *We* know that 2 of those 5 are government. Three of
them we don't know anything about, but we're not *hearing*
anything so we can presume that they were picked for that reason
-- you know, that they would not provide good [press] coverage,
they would not talk this up, and they wouldn't reveal what's
going on in the trial.
So before we even get to trial, what people should understand is
this: This thing is fixed. It's rigged.
Now looking at it you could reasonably think, "Well it's rigged
so they're sure to get a conviction." But that's not true either.
Some of the people who are on trial are *not* Branch Davidians.
They are government plants; they're agents that were already in
Mount Carmel before the raid. You might remember some of the
comments that were made afterwards by Ann Richards and Janet
Reno, uh, that we should have agencies working together so we
don't have a problem with one agency running up on another
agency's undercover operation. This is what happened in Waco. You
had agencies attacking Mount Carmel that didn't know the other
agencies were already working undercover there.
HARDER: Um-hum. [Indicates he understands]
THOMPSON: So some of the people that were brought out, for
instance, the day of the fire, were not Branch Davidians. They
were, in fact, one agency's undercover operatives. That... Those
people are on trial anyway because they can't afford to tell you,
tell the American public, "These are agents." All right? They
don't want their identity revealed.
Now what happens if you have a government agent and you put 'em
on -- you know, an undercover agent like that -- you put 'em on
trial. They're charged with a crime. They have the same
protection as any defendant. They've got the 5th amendment right
not to testify. They never have to admit they're agents. They
never have to testify. And they're fine, as long as they're
acquitted, right?
HARDER: Right.
THOMPSON: Now what we're seeing in this trial, that I think is
very, very interesting, is the government is *throwing* the
trial. For now, the only side of the story that has been
presented has been the prosecution's case. You will *not* see
a... Realize: The U.S. attorney has no surprises. There are... He
does not put a witness on the stand he has not interviewed. He's
going to know exactly what that witnesses testimony is going to
be.
HARDER: Um-hum. [Indicates he understands]
THOMPSON: Now if you have one brain [cell] in your head, you do
not put a witness on the stand that's gonna hurt your side.
That's the other side's job. All right? You don't go lining up
witnesses that get on the stand and tell things that are bad for
you. And you certainly don't elicit that testimony yourself. And
yet that's exactly what the government has done. They have put up
witness after witness, *of their own*, that has said things like,
"Well, yeah, we did shoot our own agents," "Yeah, well, we were
gonna make this dynamic entry," "Yeah, we did lose the element of
surprise."
Now. There's 2 reasons this is happening: (1) The government is
throwing the trial. But (2) the only story that comes out that
way is exactly the same story that we've got in the ATF final
report and what we've heard in the media all along. It is damage
control. Even though they appear to be making all these great
admissions, they're not admitting anything more than they've
already admitted. And they're making sure that the story stays
the same in the process of the trial. And they're throwing the
trial.
They're probably going to get convictions of the real Branch
Davidians. The people that are acquitted are suspect. But I don't
believe we're going to see convictions of the government agents
in this trial. And I think that's the purpose of what's going on
here and why there has been such extreme control.
HARDER: [Pause.... ] Wow!
Linda Thompson is a lawyer. She is with us. She's talking to us
about what she knows about the Waco trial. She has provided...
She has produced, I should say, a new videotape which is now
[Feb. 11, 1994] just in the duplication stage, called "Waco, the
Big Lie Continues," or "Waco II," if you please. It's available
through us, if you want to call up 1-800-888-9999. We'll be right
back.
(to be continued)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


105
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-09.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 9
=====================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[CN Editor -- In the past, I have pointed out that "LaRouche is
not infallible." Yet at times, the "Wacky Frenchman" really seems
to be *extraordinarily* on-target. This is especially true, I
think, in his economic analyses. What follows is from the May 30,
1994, *The New Federalist*.]
MOST IMPORTANT CRISIS IN MODERN HISTORY
In an interview with the weekly radio program "EIR Talks" on May
19, Lyndon LaRouche commented on the jailing of Carlos Andres
Perez (CAP), a former President of Venezuela.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Carlos Andres Perez in his second incarnation as President
inaugurated the group of IMF [International Monetary Fund]
conditionalities measures which caused a shock to the entire
country of Venezuela, and had an effect on neighboring economies.
Now, CAP was very close to the organization of Diego Cisneros,
which is Gustavo Cisnero's organization. Gustavo Cisneros was
engaged in very wild speculation, together with putting his
brother Ricardo Cisneros in charge of the Banco Latino. According
to all the reports of the examination so far, they ran Banco
Latino the way that some people were accused of running
syndicates of savings and loan associations back in the 1980s.
This was against the interest of those in Venezuela who were
investing in the nation of Venezuela. So very rapidly, CAP went
from being a popular President to one of the most hated men in
Venezuela. He eventually was pretty much hounded out of office
for his financial irregularities as President.
New election, we have a new President: Caldera. The Cisneros
organization and its friends were not satisfied with that. They
had to try to wreck the country politically with the support of
foreign agencies; and they set out to destroy the new presidency
of Caldera.
In the process of that, they went after my friend, Alejandro
Pena. While CAP's old friend, Cisneros, starts to go after Pena
*to protect CAP* and CAP's faction, CAP himself ends up in the
jug.
But what this represents is more importantly defined as follows:
We are coming to the point, at which the IMF system, the Federal
Reserve system, in their present forms, are DOOMED. Nothing can
be done to save them, and no money should be wasted trying to
save them. But what happens is, you have this doomed dinosaur --
its eggs aren't fertile anymore -- and it becomes desperate and
frantic as the Cisneros organization did.
They were doomed. They were caught with their hands in the till.
Ricardo Cisneros is a fugitive from justice because of what
happened to the bank. But they won't give up. They sit in there
in their fight like a species facing extinction; and they have
this attitude of *apres nous le deluge*, after me comes nothing,
comes chaos. I don't care, I'm going to fight to get every moment
of power and wealth I can have before I go down; and if I go
down, I'm going to take the world with me.
But that's not just a Venezuelan problem: It's a problem around
the world. The policies and the policy complex behind Maggie
Thatcher in London and her crony, or what she describes in her
memoirs as her virtual stooge, then President George Bush: that
system, that way of life, that new world disorder, is doomed.
But George ain't going quietly; neither are the Thatcherites;
neither is the Diego Cisneros organization, or CAP. So CAP goes
to prison. IT'S A SIGN OF THE TIMES GLOBALLY. Fundamental changes
are in order. Probably the most important crisis in all modern
history is now falling around our ears. And old institutions that
seemed to rule the world for decades, are now going down into the
mud.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"The New Federalist" is published weekly. Subscriptions are
available at $20 for 50 issues, $35 for 100 issues. Make checks
payable to "New Federalist" at Circulation Department, The New
Federalist, PO Box 889, Leesburg, VA 22075.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


274
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-10.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,274 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 10
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[From an interview with Linda Thompson on the *For the People*
radio show, Feb. 11, 1994. Host is Chuck Harder.]
[Continued...]
CHUCK HARDER: We are back. We're talking to Linda Thompson. She
is an attorney. And she has been studying the Waco matter. She
has produced a masterful videotape. (I saw the first one. The
second one, I understand, is just a real, real eye-popper.)
Now Linda, you're telling me that the government is throwing the
trial. What do you mean by "throwing" the trial? What will the
outcome be?
LINDA THOMPSON: The outcome will be... The only damaging
testimony has been against 2 people, Brad Branch and Livingstone
Fagan, thus far. There has not been any damaging testimony
against most of the other Branch Davidians. I think we're going
to see acquittals of the majority of the Branch Davidians. And
that is because the government is putting on witnesses that
*hurt* the government, at least in the eyes of the jury.
HARDER: Uh-huh. [Indicates he understands]
THOMPSON: Because the government has been able to completely
control the evidence available to the defense attorneys, for
instance. There's nobody that's going to challenge, effectively,
what is being presented. For instance, one glaring example of
this, at the trial the other day... One of the ATF agents
testified that they had moved the day of the raid up a day
because the *Waco Herald-Tribune* was gonna come out with their
articles on Saturday. And they moved the raid up to Sunday. And
that they had planned to do the raid, originally, on Monday.
That's not true. The [search] warrant was applied for on the
24th. It expired on the 28th, which was Sunday. And that is the
day the raid was done, was the 28th. They could not have had any
other plan to do it on Monday because the warrant would have
already been expired on Monday.
Now this is an example of a little bit of nonsense that they have
come up with to help bolster their story. You know, that they
"lost the element of surprise." The claim of losing the element
of surprise is in itself a lie. But it's being told, not for the
purpose of admitting that the government is a bunch of bumbling
boobs, but to reinforce the idea that the Branch Davidians were
*waiting* for them. When you say you "lost the element of
surprise," what are you essentially saying -- the Branch
Davidians had an opportunity to prepare. And that's what they're
claiming. That is their story: "The Branch Davidians were waiting
on us. Yes, our guys screwed up. They lost the element of
surprise." That's the government's official story. And this is
the kind of evidence that they're putting on, with a series of
these little "admissions": "Yes, we probably shot our own guys,"
"Yes, we lost the element of surprise," and so forth.
And that is what they're doing at trial, is presenting this
preconceived story, all of which *is* *a* *lie*. But they're
making sure that just that version comes out. There's nobody
there to effectively challenge it. It's going to go straight down
the way they've told it in the ATF final report. And at the same
time, the government is making sure that they release just enough
bad information against themselves that there will be acquittals.
And you would not do that... I mean, the prosecution does not put
on witnesses that *hurt* their case, unless they're throwing the
trial -- and that's what they're doing.
HARDER: All right. Why would they want acquittals?
THOMPSON: Because some of these people on trial are government
agents. They're not Branch Davidians.
And they're caught in a crack. They cannot reveal to the American
public that they've got government agents that are on trial.
Because those were undercover agents. They were plants. They were
people that you're not supposed to know are not Branch Davidians.
HARDER: So they're in a "catch-22".
THOMPSON: Well it's not really a "catch-22". It's really pretty
clever because they can use these same people to convict the ones
they need to convict, and yet use their own testimony of agents
that get up on the stand to give away just enough information to
*acquit* the ones they want acquitted. For instance, if you've
got somebody on the stand says, "Well I didn't see this guy with
a gun," and "He didn't do anything," while you've got another one
getting on the stand pointing a finger at a specific one, you can
tell who they're targeting. They're intending to get convictions
of a few of them and acquittals of others by the direct
testimony. They're manipulating this trial very effectively.
HARDER: I'm surprised that nobody moved to sever any of these
people. [CN -- By this, "sever", I think is meant to move for a
separate trial for a particular defendant.]
THOMPSON: Well I think they did, actually. There was one attorney
(that is not appointed) and he did move to sever. And the motion
was denied. That would be the basis for an appeal.
But there's a lot of things that I would have expected to see
from the defense attorneys that has not occurred. Such as
*endless* fights over the evidence. For instance, they should
have been entitled to all... All this stuff is filmed; every bit
of it was filmed...
HARDER: Right.
THOMPSON: ...top to bottom, inside-out. They should have been
entitled to those videos. They haven't been able to get 'em. And
rather than allow it to proceed to trial without that evidence,
my personal preference would have been to go on and appeal it
right then. You can get what's called an "interlocutory appeal,"
*demand* that you get this evidence. Because you're entitled to
it. By law you are entitled to anything that tends to prove that
your client is not guilty. We know from one of the pictures that
*is* available and has been shown at trial -- in fact it's in our
video... It's a picture of the front door. That is absolutely
good for the Branch Davidians because it shows that the ATF is
standing there shooting at the front door. There's no one at any
of the front windows. This is a dead-on picture. You'll see it in
"Waco II". It's not in "Waco I". But it's a picture of the front
door; no one at any of the windows. The front door is cracked
open; it opens inward. And the ATF has said, "The Branch
Davidians were at all the windows. They shot out through the
front door with such force that it bowed the door." You can't bow
a door that's open. You know, if it opens inward, the force of
bullets coming from inside would have slammed the door shut...
HARDER: Right.
THOMPSON: ...before it bowed the door.
Well the door's open, there's a lot of bullet holes in it.
They're all from the outside. There's not a single Branch
Davidian at any of the windows. And there's only *one* window
that's even broken -- and that's the window that ATF is shooting
into.
But the most *damning* pieces of evidence is that there's a
little child out front, as all this is going on, and then we've
got video footage that shows them taking another child, in a
little black body bag, to an ambulance. So they killed kids that
first day.
Now we've got proof that the first shots were fired by the
overhead helicopter; not by the Branch Davidians and not by ATF,
but by the helicopter that flew over and fired into the roof
where the women and children were. And they killed kids in there
too!
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
[CN Editor -- Now seems like a good time to insert the
following section from the Report of the Committee for
Waco Justice. Excerpts only.]
ALLEGATIONS AGENTS SHOT INDISCRIMINATELY AND FROM HELICOPTERS
(Section 13, BATF-Treasury section of report)
The Treasury report states that BATF agents "returned fire when
possible, but conserved their ammunition. They also fired only
when they saw an individual engage in a threatening action, such
as pointing a weapon." (TDR:101) However, Branch Davidians claim
BATF agents fired indiscriminately, including through walls, and
that helicopters sprayed the building with bullets. News video
tapes clearly show agents exercising little control over their
firing as they fire over vehicles with little or no view of what
they were shooting at. Both BATF Director Higgins at an April 2nd
Congressional hearing and Treasury Secretary Bentsen during the
September 1993 Treasury Department press conference denied
allegations that agents fired indiscriminately. {1}.
(a) Bullet Evidence in Doors, Walls and Roof
Branch Davidians, and attorneys Dick DeGuerin and Jack Zimmerman
who visited Mount Carmel during the siege, insist that there was
extensive evidence that BATF agents shot indiscriminately through
Mount Carmel Center's front door, walls and roof. They were very
concerned with preserving this evidence of an out-of-control
assault.
The *New York Times* reported, "both lawyers clearly believed
that helicopters flying over the compound during the raid had
fired into upper floors of the main building from above." {2}.
Except for half the front door, all this evidence was destroyed
by the April 19 tank rammings, the fire, and the bulldozing of
still burning walls into the rubble.
(b) Wayne Martin Allegations on 911 Tape
Wayne Martin and an unidentified Branch Davidian complain
frantically to Lieutenant Lynch 15 minutes after the start of the
raid about the continuing gun fire from BATF agents, even as they
themselves withhold fire. Nearly continuous gunfire can be heard
in the background of the tape.
MARTIN: Another chopper with more people; more guns
going off. They're firing. That's them, not us.
UNIDENTIFIED DAVIDIAN: There's a chopper with more of
them.
LYNCH: What!?
DAVIDIAN: Another chopper with more people and more guns
going off. Here they come!
(d) Catherine Matteson Allegation
"I seen (sic) those trailers drive up. I was downstairs. I
thought it strange, but I figured they were delivering firewood
or something. I picked up the Sunday paper and went upstairs to
my room, and started reading. When next, bullets came through the
roof. I could hear the helicopters overhead, I got under my bed."
{3}.
(e) Children's Pictures of Bullets Through Roof
A story about psychologist Bruce D. Perry's interviews with
Branch Davidian children who left Mount Carmel after the raid
mentions, "Still another child created a picture of a house
beneath a rainbow. When Perry asked, 'Is there anything else?'
the child calmly added bullet holes in the roof. That was an
allusion to the Feb. 28 shootout with federal agents that marked
the beginning of a 51-day standoff and left the compound near
Waco scarred with bullet holes." {4}. A May 19, 1993 *Newsweek*
story shows this picture with the caption, "A girl drew her
home's dotted roof. 'Bullets,' she said."
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
HARDER: We're talking about helicopter gunships firing against
American citizens. [CN Editor -- Yes, *and* indiscriminately
*and* at children.]
THOMPSON: Yeah, absolutely. And the thing is, in the ATF report,
they do very deceitful things. They say that... [music signalling a
break begins to be audible]... oh, sorry.
HARDER: All right. Let's do a short break here. This almost
sounds like George Orwell stuff. We'll be right back.
(to be continued)
--------------------------<< Notes >>----------------------------
{1} "Sect's Lawyers Dispute Gunfight Details," *New York Times*,
April 5, 1993, A10 and transcript of September 30, 1993 Treasury
Department press conference.
{2} *New York Times*, April 5, 1993, A10.
{3} Interview with Catherine Matteson, August 30, 1993, on file
at Gun Owners of America.
{4} Sue Anne Pressley, May 5, 1993, A17. [*New York Times*(??)]
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
*The Massacre of the Branch Davidians*. Report of the Committee
for Waco Justice. Committee for Waco Justice, PO Box 33037,
Washington, DC 20033. Phone: 202/986-1847 & 202/797-9877
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


382
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-11.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,382 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 11
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
THE MONETARY SYSTEM IS COLLAPSING
(The following testimony was submitted on April 13, 1994 to the
Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs, of the U.S.
House of Representatives. It was written by Christopher White,
contributing editor of Executive Intelligence Review [EIR]
magazine, and Richard Freeman, of EIR's economics desk.)
[From the May 30, 1994, *The New Federalist*.]
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Mr. Chairman,
It is now just over one year ago since Lyndon LaRouche, the
editor of our magazine, put forward a March 9, 1993 proposal to
levy a 0.1 percent tax on the sale of all the various mutations
of financial transactions known as "derivatives."
The intent of this proposal was to permit constitutionally
mandated institutional authorities to regain control over
"runaway" deregulated electronic financial market places. The
proposal will determine what the magnitude of the threat posed to
the generality by derivatives is; and, to create the
circumstances in which the structure of derivatives markets might
be properly investigated. Moreover, the tax constitutes a precise
means to surgically lance and dry out the derivatives bubble, to
eliminate it within weeks.
The derivatives market, in which there are $16 trillion in
derivatives holdings held by commercial banks and financial
institutions in the United States, with an annual turnover
trading volume of $300 trillion, is the greatest bubble in
history. It dwarfs the Mississippi Bubble in France and the South
Sea Island bubble in England. This bubble, like a cancer, has
penetrated and taken over the entirety of our banking and credit
system; there is no major commercial bank, investment bank,
mutual fund, etc. that is not dependent on derivatives for its
existence. These derivatives suck the life's blood out of our
economy. Our farms, our factories, our nation's infrastructure,
our living standards are being sucked dry to pay off interest
payments, dividend yields as well as other earnings on the
bubble.
Need for action has long been evident. In testimony by these two
authors to this committee on October 28, 1993, entitled, "Tax and
Dry Out the Derivatives Market, Don't Regulate It," we stressed
the necessity of the 0.1 percent tax. On March 28, 1994, the
chairman of this committee, Rep. Henry Gonzalez [D-Texas],
stated, "I think ultimately the only way you could stop, in fact,
overnight [derivatives trading activity, is] if you imposed a
1/10th of 1 percent tax on those transactions. You'd see an
immediate deflation."
However, what the violent events over the first three months of
this year prove, is that while LaRouche's March 9, 1993 proposal
is still vitally essential, it, by itself, will not be sufficient
to control the emerging situation. Events have far advanced. *The
derivatives transactions which are subject to taxation are in the
process themselves of collapsing. What is needed now is an answer
to the question: Is there life after the derivatives bubble has
been and gone?*
That which was feared, is in progress. That which the proponents
of derivatives insisted could not come to pass, because of their
sophisticated methods of "risk assessment" has come to pass. The
supposed liquidity of the market, allegedly proved by computer
simulations, dried up overnight. The mere catalogue of wreckage
shows losses of the size that even a few years ago would have
been unthinkable: from the $600 million lost by speculator George
Soros's Quantum Fund on one day, Feb. 14, 1994; to the $1 billion
loss of Steinhardt Management's hedge fund; to the early April
bankruptcy liquidation of the entire market holdings of the $600
million in assets, exotic mortgage securities derivatives of the
David J. Askin's Hedge Funds. This same process of mega-losses is
occurring around the world.
To those who congratulate themselves that they "got through" this
period, we offer this timely warning: Those whom the gods would
destroy, they first make mad. *This is a systemic crisis; we are
now in the midst of an ongoing, snowballing systemic collapse, of
which the events of the first quarter of 1994 are merely a tiny
foretaste.*
It is time that Congress, through its appropriate committees,
begins to discuss the question of how our national monetary and
financial affairs might be reorganized such that national life
can continue, after the collapse of the biggest financial bubble
in human history has run its course.
For which reason we append to this statement the vitally
necessary draft legislation intended to reorganize the Federal
Reserve System, through the re-establishment of a National Bank,
the Third such National Bank in the history of the Republic. This
is the first order of business.
Such a proposal is consistent with Article 1, Section 8 of the
Constitution, in which Congress is allotted the power to raise
taxes and create money and credit.
With an ongoing financial collapse, the time has come to
reappropriate those powers which from the beginning were
allocated, for cause, to the constitutionally created branches of
government, that the General Welfare provisions of the
Constitution might once more inform the laws of the land in
substance as well as intent.
What is now under way can only be efficiently addressed by act of
government. There is no private agency which can provide the
volume of credit required to ensure the continued functioning of
national life. There will shortly be no private agency with
credit anywhere in any case. Federal government must again become
the sovereign source of credit, in the form of Treasury note
issues, providing banking agencies with the means of issue to
finance the economic activity of the country, thereby eliminating
the subversive "discounting" practices of the Federal Reserve,
and the so-called "Keynesian multiplier" methods of money
creation through manipulation of federal debt.
The destruction of inflated financial assets over the first three
months of the year to date exceeds the havoc wrought by the stock
market crash of October 1987. The nominal bill for such "losses"
during the first quarter will, in the not-too-distant future, be
confirmed to start at about $2 trillion. Such "losses," under
detailed investigation, will turn out to be about 14-15 percent
of the notional value of all derivatives contracts traded,
swapped, or whatever else it is they do with them.
If we, as a country, were not so idiotically attuned to the day-
by-day, minute-by-minute jerking around of the "Down-Jones" Index
as our basic indicator of the economic health of the universe as
a whole, this elementary reality would have been grasped already.
The initial losses of the first quarter are only the beginning.
There is the proverbial other shoe left to drop. The "blow off"
of the remainder of the bubble is going to make clear that this
country has been living in the equivalent of "loud cuckoo land"
for about a generation. Over the course of that generation, there
have been no "recoveries," there has been no "rebuilding of
competitiveness."
There has been looting and asset stripping. There has been
economic depression. That is shortly to come to the fore in the
kind of rude way which our accumulated national fantasy life, and
its televised mirror image, will find impossible to ignore.
Obviously those who most violently dispute this now will soon
find themselves among the ranks of the most rudely shocked.
The turmoil of the last three months is not a "market
correction," despite all the analysts and investment strategists
who proclaim about their proverbial 10-15 percent decline blowing
the froth off an over-heated "bull-run." Nor is it merely a
matter internal to the market. What is going on is without
precedent in human history.
There is a global financial collapse in progress -- a global
financial collapse which was already in progress before the
beginning of the year. From 1993 onward, from Chile, and the case
of the Codelco raw materials company; to Argentina, and its bond
and stock market; to Venezuela and the case of Banco Latino; to
Spain and the multi-hundreds of millions loss of that country's
fourth-largest bank, Banesto; to the United Kingdom and the Hong
Kong and Shanghai Bank-owned Midland Bank; to France and the case
of the multi-billion dollar loss at Credit Lyonnais; to Germany
and the $1 billion plus loss at Metallgesellschaft; to the
reputed several billion dollar losses at Malaysia's central bank,
and the banks of Indonesia.
What is developing is global in scope. The losses are all related
to derivatives trading. Sound companies and industrial concerns
are being sacrificed to the vagaries of derivatives. Germany's
Metallgesellschaft, the country's 14th largest industrial
concern, will now lay off one-fifth of its work force, and asset-
strip its operations to pay for the loss.
This committee is correct to highlight the activities of the
hedge funds. They engage in the most wildly speculative behavior.
Hedge funds are, for the most part, offshore, unregulated
gambling casinos, relying on mountains of leverage. They are
specifically constituted, by having 99 or fewer U.S. investor
partners, to circumvent the Investment Company Act of 1940, which
would otherwise regulate them. Hedge funds work on anywhere from
5 to 1, up to 50 to 1 leverage. That means for every $1 billion
of the hedge fund's own money which it has under management, it
borrows from $5 to $50 billion. The over-300 hedge fund's have
$75 billion in assets under management, meaning they could
control an astounding amount of publicly traded bonds and stocks
of anywhere from $375 billion to $3.75 trillion in value. By
comparison, the average trading volume on the New York stock
exchange is but $11 billion daily.
But every congressman should ask the obvious question: If for
every $1 billion the hedge fund puts up, the hedge fund is
getting from $5 to $50 billion from someone else, isn't that
other party, lending the $5 to $50 billion, far more important?
The answer is, of course. The committee must note the dominant
role of the commercial banks, especially the Morgan banking
group, and the investment banks, who lend the money to the hedge
funds, and use the hedge funds as their "bird dogs," having the
hedge funds make the speculations that the commercial and
investment banks would be too embarrassed to make on their own.
Not only that, but every congressman should know that the
commercial banks put money from their own accounts into these
hedge funds, and it is claimed, put money from the banks' trust
departments into these hedge funds.
The largest derivatives trading banks are: Chemical, Citicorp,
J.P. Morgan, Bankers Trust, Bank of America, Chase Manhattan,
First Chicago, and Republic National Bank of Edmund Safra. Morgan
Bank, and the Bankers Trust which it set up in the 1903-07
period, and controls to this day, control together 31 percent of
the $12 trillion of derivatives holdings of the major commercial
banks. Morgan dominates derivatives trading. Among the investment
banks, the largest derivatives traders are: Morgan Stanley;
Goldman Sachs; Salomon Brothers; Lehman Brothers and Merrill
Lynch. These are the institutions that control the hedge funds.
These are the institutions whose activities, above all, must be
investigated and controlled.
Moreover, there is an equally huge scandal. It is open knowledge
that the entire financial market structure of the United States
has been artificially rigged for the last three and a half years.
Short-term interest rates were set at 3 percent and long term
rates at 6.5 to 7 percent, the largest spread in post-World War
II history, to benefit and enrich the commercial and investment
banks who made derivatives plays on this spread. The losers on
this operation were the American population, which paid dearly to
"bail out" the banks. [CN Editor -- This sweet deal for bankers
was also covered on the Saturday, June 11, 1994 "News From
Neptune" show. I will try to feature excerpts in an upcoming
"Conspiracy Nation".]
Oversight on the markets must begin with how the Federal Reserve
Board of Governors, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
working with the Treasury Department, starting in the Bush
administration, rigged this hideous operation.
Thus, the danger of derivatives trading and its damage is not
limited to headline catching speculative excesses, and failures,
of some outfits like the now notorious, U.S. legal-code-evading
"hedge funds." There may be the financial, or electronic,
equivalent of dead bodies left by the side of the financial
version of the electronic superhighway. But they are the result
of a pile-up, not its cause.
The cited cases all involve the use of financial derivatives.
Our estimate of losses sustained during the first quarter of 1994
is not, however, based on adding up reports of losses sustained
by individual banks, corporations or funds. The whole so-called
asset base on which the derivative bubble depends has been
devalued. The ongoing devaluation of assets has set in motion a
collapse which proceeds as the so-called leverage, or pyramiding,
of the derivatives transactions unwinds. In this it is not only
the most egregious which are affected, but all, for all financial
assets are being devalued.
The ongoing financial collapse is characterized by the
application of "reverse leverage" against those institutions and
banks which had resorted to the use of leverage or pyramiding to
inflate their so-called gains, or nominal so-called assets.
The increase of interest rates, long-term as well as short-term,
has been the trigger for the process by which the bubbled assets
have been deflated, and the effects of reverse leverage,
unleashed.
For example, there are over $3 trillion of U.S. government
securities held by what the Treasury and the Office of Management
and the Budget are accustomed to call the "public." Bond yields
have risen by almost 20 percent since the beginning of the year,
25 percent since October 1993. Since prices and yields move
inversely, it is merely conservative to assume that the face
value of the bonds has shrunk by as much as the yields have
increased -- $600 billion on that account alone. This would be
100 times what George Soros's Quantum Fund reported its losses to
be over the days between Feb. 10 and Feb. 12.
The same approach can be taken to inspect "collateralized
mortgage obligations" in their "principal only" and "interest
only" strip form. Mortgage rates have risen as fast as have the
yields on the Treasury's debt. Municipal bonds, too, and more
exotic such instruments as, for example, the secondary market in
so-called "emerging country" debt.
Now, U.S. Treasury bonds, whose world-wide daily trading volume
was estimated at $300 billion one year ago, increasing by 100
percent and more in the twelve months to February and March in
exchanges in Chicago, London and Paris, are the core of the
"hedging" operations undertaken by derivatives dealers. Borrow,
against bonds, borrowed or held, to finance positions for or
against various currencies, "hedged" back into something else,
and so on.
It was less than one year ago that the International Swap
Dealers' Association began to insist that "notional value" was
not a useful way of looking at derivative exposure. Better, they
insisted then would be "replacement" cost. This because, even a
year ago, the notional sums that had been generated out of
whatever electronic device they employ had grown to mind-boggling
proportions. "Replacement cost" shrank the numbers back to more
manageable proportions.
The difference between the two was a measure of the leverage, or
pyramiding, applied from original "position," at cost, borrowed
or not, to notional value.
The 20 percent increase in bond yields [CN Editor -- Apparently
this means, in other words, the decreasing of the actual value of
the bonds.] has undone a lot of the accumulated leverage that has
been built into the world monetary system. For example, "hedge
funds" can be leveraged up to 100 times, in which case, a 1
percent movement is sufficient to wipe out the collateral or
"margin" position. "Hedge funds" disposing, according to "Mar-
Hedge" and others, of around $100 billion in total assets, are
typically leveraged 10 to 15 times. A movement against them of
6.6 percent to 10 percent on the notional values at stake, wipes
out all their margin or collateral.
The matter is not the unwinding of leverage against hedge funds
alone, but the whole accumulated mass of some $16 trillion
notional so-called value in the United States -- and $25 trillion
worldwide -- unwinding against everything else.
The bubble has been premised on a perpetuated fraud about the
growth of the earnings of the U.S. economy. There has been no
growth in the earnings of the U.S. economy. There has been no
growth, not in the U.S. economy, not in the world economy, since
the period 1967-70.
The country needs a reorganized, constitutional credit system. It
needs such, so that we can begin to do the things which most
living Americans are too young to remember their country ever
having done. We need to create qualified employment for our
people, through rebuilding our basic economic infrastructure in
transportation, power generation, and water supply, and in our
attenuated capabilities for capital goods production.
Credits issued for such purposes will generate more wealth than
their original cost. We can create 6 million productive and
decent-paying jobs in infrastructure and manufacturing and
agriculture. The world economy must likewise be reorganized
around development programs, which Mr. LaRouche has specified.
This includes the "Productive Triangle" for the development of
the Eurasian land mass, and the "Oasis Plan" for the development
of the Middle East. This latter plan, which includes irrigation,
and cheap abundant nuclear power, would provide the rock-solid
basis for the praiseworthy Israeli-PLO peace process to succeed.
The collapse of the biggest financial bubble in history requires
urgent action; it also provides the opportunity to put the
country back on its feet, and under its own law.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"The New Federalist" is published weekly. Subscriptions are
available at $20 for 50 issues, $35 for 100 issues. Make checks
payable to "New Federalist" at Circulation Department, The New
Federalist, PO Box 889, Leesburg, VA 22075.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


200
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-12.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 12
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[CN Editor -- The local all volunteer radio station, WEFT 90.1
FM, has a 1-hour show at 10 A.M. on Saturday mornings called
"News From Neptune." The following is a partial transcript of
their June 11, 1994 broadcast. Co-hosts are Paul "The Truth"
Muth, and Carl Estabrook.]
[...]
MUTH: ...The other thing unique this week is that I heard a
business correspondent mouth something that I have been talking
about vis-a-vis Fed [Federal Reserve] policy for awhile. And that
was, he frankly said that this isn't so much an anti-inflationary
policy of keeping... well, when the Fed was backing off on the
interest rate very slowly, uh, and now raising it again -- when
it doesn't look like inflation is around... What was
Rukeyser's(?) comment that I wanted? -- "Inflation neurotics".
ESTABROOK: Yeah.
MUTH: But what *I* thought was happening -- and then I heard from
a person from NPR [National Public Radio]. I forget who it was,
but it was on the nightly business report on Thursday. What
really was going on was keeping the "spread" wide. The "spread"
is historically high, uh, 3 percent, roughly, I think.
ESTABROOK: You should say what we mean by the "spread" here.
That's the difference between the *real* interest rate -- the
difference, basically, between what banks are lending money at
and what they're paying for the money themselves.
[CN Editor -- In other words, the Fed loans money to the
banks at 3 percent interest. If the banks then charge
customers, say, 4 percent to borrow this money, the
"spread" is the difference between the two rates of 3
and 4 percent: 1 percent. If the spread is high (e.g.
the bankers do not pass on the Fed's lower rates to
their customers), the banks make more profit on the
money they lend.]
MUTH: Right. Right. How much... Generally it's [i.e. the spread]
been about 1.5 percent, historically. But it's up to 3 [percent]
now. It may have backed off a little bit from that in the raising
of the rates.
ESTABROOK: So you're suggesting that the policy that's been
followed by the Fed and the federal government, together, has
been sort of the "Banker's Recovery Act of 1994," Paul? Is that
it?
MUTH: Indeed. And they didn't have to pass it through Congress...
ESTABROOK: Funny about that.
MUTH: ...and they didn't have to be embarrassed by having these
huge figures that we cited earlier with [Charles] Keating; how
much money is being used to bail out the S&Ls. It's being done,
uh, by the bankers, themselves.
ESTABROOK: So Clinton *did* get his stimulus package. The point
was, it just wasn't for the rest of us. It was for the bankers.
And they were stimulated.
MUTH: And it's quite clear that the profits for banks have been
quite good. And the people knew... people who were on the inside,
which doesn't... not, not evoking a *huge* conspiracy. But people
who have the money and are playing the markets knew that bank
stocks were gonna fare well with this kind of policy. And
they've, uh, cleaned up again!
ESTABROOK: Well, I remember, it was about a year ago, that there
was much talk about the unsoundness of the American banking
system for a variety of reasons -- including a sort of "historic
sclerosis" -- and you don't hear that talk much anymore. And the
reason is, I think, exactly as you describe. That what we have
here is (by a supposedly "populist" administration), we have a,
uh, vast national conspiracy to restore the health of the banks.
I've said for awhile that when the evening news talks about "the
economy" and how "the economy" is doing, reasonable people
translate that word "economy" into the phrase "rich people's
money." So we say, "The economy is getting better," -- "Rich
people's money is getting better." "The economy is doing worse,"
-- "Rich people don't have quite so much money as they used to."
That's really what's at stake and what we've seen from our
supposedly "liberal" administration, is, an aggressive attempt to
make sure that rich people's money is O.K. They've done fairly
well on that score, huh?
MUTH: And so it's "Trickle Down, Plus," basically.
ESTABROOK: Only, as we found last time around, it doesn't trickle
down very much, does it?
MUTH: Well that's... That goes without saying. That's just part
of the camouflage.
ESTABROOK: Well, in fact, I'm not sure it *does* go without
saying, my friend. Because there is such persiflage put forth by
the, let's say the "economics profession" (to take a laughable
example) about what's happening in the American economy, that
it's sometimes difficult to break through the propaganda.
Take the issue of wages: We find supposedly competent economists
tell you that, "Things are getting better for American wage
earners." Well, in fact, that's false. Real wages in this country
have been declining for 20 years. The figure that is often given
is about 15% over the last 20 years. But Doug Headwood's(?)
excellent newsletter put forth, last week, another way of
thinking about this that I think is worthwhile. He says, if you
look at it in terms of the amount of time it takes for someone
earning the average hourly wage -- the *average* now -- to make
the equivalent of a household's yearly expenses, *that* figure is
up 43 percent over 20 years. That is, it takes you almost half
again as long to work to earn the money you need to spend on your
basic household expenses. If you want to buy a house, that figure
is up 45 percent. For a new car, the average is 57 percent. To
pay for a year at an elite college (and this shows, it seems to
me, the greater diversion between rich and poor in this country),
the figure is up 75 percent over the last 20 years.
Now what we have here is a sort of "dumb-bell" shape to the
demographics. That is, the middle gets stretched away and we have
a two-tiered society, a two-tiered economy. The rich are doing
well. Those whose income has risen the equivalent of 75 percent
find it no more trouble to send their kid to a good college now
than they did 20 years ago. But for those on the other end of the
extreme, what was technically possible 20 years ago is now
outside of the realm of possibility. Owning a house, say. Sending
a kid to an elite college. And this is the sort of change, this
is the sort of decline in *real* wages that's even much more
serious than the numbers -- even when they aren't "cooked".
MUTH: There's a lot of ways of obscuring this. For one, if you
focus on the wage earners, then all the people that are living on
their inherited wealth and those kind of dividends from stocks,
etc. All that money is set aside. You're not looking at that.
You're really looking at people that are working. And a lot of
times when you see "income," you know, gross average income,
reported, all those other figures are put in.
So it's quite, you know... And then you can also use the family
earning. And that, uh, that factors in the fact that most people
who are in families are in two-income earner families. So, uh...
ESTABROOK: Right.
MUTH: ...that doesn't acknowledge the decay of the quality of
life that's come about because of that.
ESTABROOK: Absolutely. And that's a crucial point. Part of the
problem is that that's been covered over by people saying, "Well,
what we have here is just a more just relationship between men
and women in the workplace." And insofar as that's true, that's
obviously to be applauded. But in *fact* what's happened is that
under cover of that, they've produced a situation you just
described. And that's clearly a decline in the quality of life of
most people in this country.
[CN Editor -- Muth/Estabrook seem to be saying that (1)
to maintain their standard of living, American families
were forced to rely on both spouses being wage earners,
and (2) this grim necessity is disguised as being *only*
attributable to feminist advances. I wish to add my own
theory: The overseers gave the nod to feminism so as to
increase the labor pool and drive down the cost of
wages.]
The work of professional economists is often a matter of
obscuring what people know from their own experience. And people
aren't fools. People know what's happened to their working life
over the last generation. An awful lot of time is spent by our
public agencies, whether the Presidency or the Federal Reserve
agency [sic, Fed is not a public agency] or academic economists,
in trying to obfuscate these facts and trying to "manufacture
consent" to a situation that's more and more difficult to consent
to.
[...]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


172
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-13.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 13
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
RESOLVED: President Kennedy was killed as the result of a
conspiracy.
[Continuation of my transcription of a radio debate which took
place in the Fall of 1993 between Peter Dale Scott and Gerald
Posner. Today, Mr. Posner gives his rebuttal to Mr. Scott's
opening remarks.]
MODERATOR: Thank you, Mr. Scott. Mr. Posner, you have 6 minutes
for rebuttal.
GERALD POSNER: The... Some of the points that Mr. Scott mentions
I think are absolutely critical because it's [a] fundamental
difference between the two of us. And it deals, again, with the
evidence and an analysis of what is the credible evidence.
In the instance of the Walker shooting: Did Lee Harvey Oswald in
fact shoot Edwin Walker? Which to me is a key point because
nobody has ever satisfactorily explained to me why the CIA or the
mafia or the KGB or the anti-Castro Cubans wanted Walker dead.
But here's Oswald shooting at Walker in April of '63.
Mr. Scott says a moment ago (It's in April), the bullet is
described as fully copper-jacketed. That's correct. That's the
ammunition that Oswald used, is copper-jacketed bullets. Matter
of fact, we have something better than just what was described by
the Dallas police: there's the bullet. You can go to the National
Archives. You can examine it. I've been down to the National
Archives. It *is* a copper-jacketed bullet.
But more importantly, I'm willing, with Mr. Scott, to throw out
all the testimony from 1963. That bullet is too mangled to
determine ballistically if it matches Oswald's rifle. But
*science* intervened. In 1978, Dr. Vincent Guinn, the nation's
leading expert in neutron activation, a scientific test which
compares the base element of metals, came in for the House Select
Committee on Assassinations, took the mangled bullet and did
neutron activation tests. Now he could have proven that that
bullet had nothing to do with the ammunition that Oswald used
later in the Kennedy assassination. But guess what? Lo and
behold, it turns out that that bullet comes from the same batch
of Mannlicher-Carcano 6.5 mm shells, made by the Western
Cartridge Company, used in the Kennedy assassination. So there's
no question anymore where the bullet comes from. It's very
interesting. The questions could have existed in '63, but they've
been solved by science since.
One thing that we do agree on. Mr. Scott says, "Look at Oswald's
links." I think that's key. I don't just give a biography of Lee
Harvey Oswald. What am I doing through the entire time? I'm
looking to see if, in fact, there's a trail of money, if there
are telephone calls, if there are acquaintances. And what's the
key period? The key period is October and November of 1963.
Oswald has just returned from being rejected by the Cubans. His
life is literally spinning out of control. His wife is separated
from him. He can't hold a job. Um, he's been turned down by the
Cubans. He's been turned down by the Soviet Union. And the FBI's
harassing him. He's a time bomb ready to explode. On September
26, when he was on the bus on the way down to Mexico, the White
House announced that Jack Kennedy was visiting Dallas. Everything
that happened in Lee Harvey Oswald's life before September 26th
took place *before* anybody knew that Kennedy was coming to
Dallas in November.
So the key period is what happens in October and November of '63.
Where's the conspiratorial contact between Oswald and the
plotters at that point? And this is key: He's not living on his
own. We know what he's doing. He's staying in a rooming house at
1026 North Beckley and he has a whole host of rooming house
members and partners there with him; other people in the house,
including a housekeeper. And what do they say he did? Every night
he's home by 5 or 6 o'clock and he never left a single night --
except on Fridays when he would disappear for the weekend. Sounds
interesting, until you find out he was in Irving, Texas, visiting
his wife, Marina.
He never received a single telephone call, except for one, the
weekend before the assassination. Check the telephone records. It
comes from... it comes from his wife's house. He *made* a
telephone call, one a day, in a foreign language. That turns out
to be to his wife, Marina. He never received a single visitor.
Where's the opportunity for the conspiratorial contact at a time
that the plotters supposedly know that Kennedy's coming to
Dallas. It doesn't exist.
What happens is, what Mr. Scott does (and other conspiracy
theorists) is they have very good evidence to show you that
people hated Jack Kennedy. I agree with that and that there may
even have been a plot brewing. I wouldn't be surprised if
Marcello and Trafficante sat around the table and said, "Let's
kill that no-good President." What I'm saying in my book, the
challenge that I'm essentially making to conspiracy theorists, is
to show me the credible evidence that brings Lee Harvey Oswald
into the plotters. That's what doesn't exist. If there was a plot
to kill Jack Kennedy and it was afoot in '62, it didn't involve
Oswald. And that's the key point. At the critical junction when
Oswald would have had to be part of it, he's just not.
And when you look at Jack Ruby (and I think this is very
important), Mr. Scott talks about the fact that Jack Ruby knew a
lot of police, and he knew a whole host of gangsters, and he was
"dirty" "up to his eyeballs." Guess what? I agree with most of
that. There's no doubt about that. It just has nothing to do with
why he killed [...tape runs out...]
[...tape continues...] Oswald. And that's the point. People take
one existence of facts about Ruby's connections and they say,
"Therefore, he killed Oswald and they must be related." And
that's where the story falls down.
Two final points: In terms of Mr. Scott's view of this case, he
also says in his book something I fundamentally have to disagree
with: that McCarthyism and the assassination in Dallas and
Watergate and Contra-gate are all connected, with some of the
same people involved. He says he doesn't have a conspiratorial
view of the world, but I have to disagree.
And I think that what's important in this: he has a very unusual
way of proving some of the elements that he makes in his case --
sort of linking people up by who knew who, by who knew who -- but
also something he calls the "negative template," which is, if you
look at a piece of paper that has lists of names, and one of the
names you think should be there is *not* actually there, that
indicates maybe it had been removed as part of a cover-up or
conspiracy. The "negative template" means, in *my* view, that you
can prove anything you wanted to. If I was looking for a piece of
paper that said Oswald had been employed by the CIA and I took a
CIA document and Oswald's name wasn't there, it must mean that
they had *removed* his name because, in fact, he'd been an agent.
The "negative template" does not, in fact, prove what he says.
MODERATOR: Thank you, Mr. Posner.
ANNOUNCER: You're listening to "The Assassination of John F.
Kennedy, A Formal Debate," from the Virtual Radio Network. The
proposal is that President Kennedy was killed as the result of a
conspiracy. Taking the "pro" position is Peter Dale Scott, author
of *Deep Politics and the Death of JFK*. Taking the "con"
position is Gerald Posner, author of *Case Closed: Lee Harvey
Oswald and the Assassination of JFK*. Your moderator is David
Mendelson.
MODERATOR: You are listening to "The Assassination of John F.
Kennedy, A Formal Debate," with Gerald Posner and Peter Dale
Scott.
Each of you will now ask alternating questions of the other
participant. Mr. Scott, you have one minute to ask a question.
(to be continued)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


133
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-14.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 14
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[From an interview with Linda Thompson on the *For the People*
radio show, Feb. 11, 1994. Host is Chuck Harder.]
[Continued...]
CHUCK HARDER: Linda Thompson is with us. And we're talking about
the Waco trial. So what we've got right now is the government not
looking so good.
Go ahead, where we left off.
LINDA THOMPSON: Well we were with them throwing the trial, I
think.
HARDER: Yep.
THOMPSON: What we have got, and what should have been available
to the defense, is a whole lot of things that are absolute proof
that when the government says that they "lost the element of
surprise," *that* is a lie within a lie. Because they're not...
They give you the impression that they're admitting something by
saying that and admitting their guys are boobs. But what they're
doing is they're saying, "Well, yeah, we're incompetent, we're
stupid, we screwed up." There's a big difference between making
an honest mistake and intentional murder. And that's what they're
doing. They're getting out of intentional murder by appearing to
admit to stupidity.
But what they did *was* intentional murder. There's not anything
in their plan that had any provision for somebody to go up to
that front door and knock on the front door. There's no provision
in the battle plan, originally, at all. None. And they pretty
much have admitted *that* in court, too.
But they... And they also admitted that David Koresh *did* come
to the front door, he *did* open the door, he *did* say, "What's
goin' on?" -- and they began firing at him! Now they've
*admitted* these things.
HARDER: Now, has it been admitted in court that the helicopter
gunships fired first?
THOMPSON: No. That has not and I doubt it will be, because, you
see, this is what they're covering up.
HARDER: All right. How can that be proven?
THOMPSON: That can be proven by several things. First of all, in
the ATF final report, the investigators (of that final report) do
several deceitful things. One is that they criticize the ATF for
not using customs helicopters that would have had firepower. Now
that creates the impression that ATF had helicopters that
*didn't* have firepower, right? And that's the purpose of the
"critique," is to give you the impression they did not have
firepower in those helicopters. Fact is, they did. We have a
picture of one of the helicopters that has a .308 machine gun
mounted in it. And that is going to be... that *is* in "Waco II."
It's a close-up of the helicopter with the .308 machine gun in
it.
Twelve of the rounds that were recovered from the upstairs room,
where two of the agents were killed, were .308 rounds, just like
the caliber of that weapon in the helicopter.
In the footage that we have -- and some of that is in "Waco I" --
when you see edits in the film, *we* didn't make those edits.
They were made before they were released to the public. We found
footage by getting it through sources such as England, where they
got 'em before the government had time to do as much editing as
they did later. You can hear the original machine gun fire sound.
And that footage is in "Waco II," too. When those guys are
running up the ladder, there's a *lot* of machine gun fire. When
they're on the roof, you can hear the helicopter very close by --
then there's that glitch. What they edited out was the sound of
the machine gun in the helicopter firing down into the roof.
Dick DeGuerin, the attorney that they let go in and out, said he
*saw* the roof. It looked like swiss cheese.
Of the children that were allowed out, one of the kids drew a
picture of a house, her house, and dotted it with bullet holes in
the roof and explained to the psychiatrist that this was bullet
holes in the roof. We've got footage of that.
Um, and the lady, Annetta Richards, that was in there with the
children and came out with the children, was one of the people
that said that helicopters fired in on 'em, into the roof.
On the 911 tapes, when the Branch Davidians called the police...
Now that's another little bit of proof, all by itself. The fact
that they were not firing for 20 minutes into that tape. They
called the police and said, "There's a bunch of guys out here
climbing in our windows and they're shooting at us!" They called
the police. And in that tape, we've got all of the 911 tapes now
and we've had the first seven transcribed...
HARDER: All right, hang on... Linda Thompson... You'll stay
another hour?
THOMPSON: Sure.
HARDER: O.K. Ladies and gentlemen, we're gonna continue this
conversation.
Linda Thompson is an attorney. [Harder gives info on how to get
"Waco II."]
Thanks everybody. All the best. May God bless.
(to be continued)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


165
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-15.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 15
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[From an interview with Linda Thompson on the *For the People*
radio show, Feb. 11, 1994. Host is Chuck Harder.]
[Continued...]
CHUCK HARDER: Hello, everybody. Hi. Chuck Harder, *For The
People*.
Well there is some light shining on the Waco matter. And that
searchlight is directed by one Linda Thompson, who is an attorney
and who is investigating this independently. She has produced 2
videotapes. One has pretty much gone across the United States,
one way or another, called "Waco, the Big Lie." She's got a
totally new, updated version, with a *tremendous* amount of new
footage; stuff never been seen, a lot of it. Got in different
ways (and we'll not go into that.) But the point of it is... it's
called "Waco, the Big Lie Continues," and we're offering it
[...info on how to obtain...]
And Linda is on the line. And we're talking about the Waco
matter. Uh, where we left off last hour... we're now at the 911
tapes.
LINDA THOMPSON: Well you were asking about the proof of the
helicopters firing...
HARDER: Yeah. Right.
THOMPSON: ...first. And just a quick rundown of that: We have the
children's own stories that the helicopters fired into 'em.
Annetta Richards, who was one of the old ladies that came out
with the kids said that. Dick DeGuerin, the attorney who went in,
saw the roof was full of bullet holes -- *he* said that. He also
said that a nursing mother and a child had been killed in that
room. Then we have the "critique" of the ATF report by the
investigators, saying they should have used helicopters that
*had* firepower -- which is a lie, because we have a picture
showing one of the helicopters with a .308 machine gun in it, and
there were .308 bullets recovered from the upstairs room.
So all those things, so far, are proof of the helicopters firing
in. And then we also have the 911 tapes where the Branch
Davidians call the police and they say, throughout that 911 tape
you've got one fellow saying, "Here come the helicopters again!
And with more guys and more guns!" and "The helicopters are gonna
shoot down at us." You know, things like that, throughout the 911
tape...
HARDER: Um-hmm. [Indicates he understands]
THOMPSON: ...talking about the helicopter firing on 'em!
HARDER: Um-hmm. [Indicates he understands]
THOMPSON: So I have no doubt that that... you know, to me, that
is a given.
HARDER: O.K. Can we prove that the government and/or the
helicopters (which is also the government) fired first?
THOMPSON: Well, that is the only thing that makes sense. And you
can see the helicopters. The ATF report admits that the
helicopters got there about a half hour before they did. They got
there too soon.
HARDER: Um-hmm. [Indicates he understands]
THOMPSON: And in the footage that *is* available, you can see the
helicopters off on the horizon coming back for a second pass. So
yes they *were* already there. Yes they *have* already been
across. And with all this other evidence that they fired into the
roof, it only makes sense that that's who fired first. Uh, and
that's what the Branch Davidians are saying too. The two... the
older lady that came out, she said that,...
HARDER: O.K.
THOMPSON: ...that that was the first firing which... You see,
what does that do? Whoever set this up was really pretty smart
because it makes both sides think the other side shot first. And
neither side is aware that it's coming from the helicopter at
that point.
And you remember the ATF, when they first reported all this, they
said, "They had a machine gun!" You know, "They had a .50 caliber
machine gun firing at us!" And then it turns out they didn't have
any .50 caliber machine gun. But the ATF wasn't crazy when they
were saying they heard machine gun fire. They were telling the
truth. It came from a .308, which is a fairly heavy caliber
machine gun, that was in the helicopter.
HARDER: All right. So... So here we have, essentially, a
government that through its agents has murdered citizens -- call
it what you like. And now you tell me that they are essentially
throwing the trial, so that some, or many, of the Branch
Davidians who survived will most likely be acquitted.
What does that mean?
THOMPSON: Well, they're controlling... The whole thing from
beginning to end has been damage control on what's gonna be
released to the public. What they *don't* want the public to
know, from the first day, is that they killed children. 'Cause
you remember, all the propaganda that came out was: They were
doing this *because* of the children. We were all supposed to
believe that this was out of concern for the children; that
somehow they're going to protect these children and save these
children. That was the pitch. That was the angle that they chose
to pitch this from.
HARDER: Um-hmm. [Indicates he understands]
THOMPSON: Last thing they could afford to do is admit that they
killed kids the first day.
And then the last bit of cover-up that we're getting, for the
final day they killed children, too. There were 17 children under
the age of 5 killed in the final conflagration. So they can't
admit [any responsibility for] that either.
*All* of what we're seeing right now is damage control, to make
sure that just enough gets out that the same story is
perpetuated: That David Koresh was a lunatic, these people were
brainwashed, it's all their fault -- but these particular people
[on trial] probably didn't do too much (that they're going to get
acquittals on). *That's* going to be the story. That's what
they're doing is damage control.
The *real* story is, the ATF raided this place and they did use a
plan that was configured in conjunction with Special Forces. The
head of the team, Bill Buford, is ex-Special Forces. All the
planning was done hand-in-hand with 7th Special Forces out of
Fort Bragg. That is in the ATF report.
HARDER: All right, now wait a minute. Let's do this: a quick 2
minute break here. But when we come back, I want to know what the
original plan was -- according to the information you have --
what was the original plan? And why?
We'll be right back, with Linda Thompson.
(to be continued)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


195
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-16.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 16
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[From an interview with Linda Thompson on the *For the People*
radio show, Feb. 11, 1994. Host is Chuck Harder.]
[Continued...]
CHUCK HARDER: We're back. We're talking to Linda Thompson. She
has been investigating the Waco matter. [...Info on how to get
videotape...]
Now. What was the plan of the government? And why?
LINDA THOMPSON: I don't think anybody's got the answer to "why"
yet (including me), other than the obvious. Number 1, they were
able to do things that were completely illegal out in the open,
in the public eye -- such as using tanks on American citizens,
firing down on them from helicopters, and all of the things that
we saw for 51 days that were illegal -- and get away with it! In
fact, they were able to blame the victims for all of it! And I
think that was one purpose of it, was to see how well and how
effectively the American public could be manipulated *through the
media* by accepting all of the stories that we were told about
how "crazy" the Branch Davidians were -- David Koresh this, David
Koresh that -- and that we were stupid enough that we would sit
there and go, "Yeah. Those are bad guys. They deserve it.", and
not even consider the historic precedent of using *military* on
140 men, women and children! {1}. That's unheard of! And people
were so dumb they *didn't* stop and ask about it at first. {2}.
They are now, thank goodness.
HARDER: What is "*posse comitatus*"? What does that mean?
THOMPSON: There is a federal law... "*Posse comitatus*" means,
literally, a posse or a sheriff's posse; a body of men that are a
posse; or a legal body of men. Used to be, historically (and it's
still in effect today), the sheriff of any county is the highest
authority in any state. And that sheriff has the ability to use
anybody he wants to as a posse to go after bad guys. In fact, the
*posse comitatus* is the whole body of men in any county that can
be in the posse, whether the sheriff picks them or not. They can
volunteer and automatically are in it.
You are forbidden... by federal law, the government is forbidden
from using any military as a posse or as a *posse comitatus* -- a
body of men to enforce the law. The military cannot be used for
law enforcement purposes under our Constitution and under this
federal law.
Now I would personally prefer to rely on the Constitution,
because it's a much stronger document than any federal statute --
but either way. You've got a federal statute, it's at XVIII
United States Code, section 1385, the Posse Comitatus Act, which
provides criminal penalties for anybody that uses military in a
law enforcement capacity.
HARDER: Isn't that what was done?!
THOMPSON: That's exactly what was done.
Now we have several congressmen who have written me and asked me
to write questions for them to give to the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
and the Treasury Department and the FBI -- which we did, and
which they did. And the response that they've got back to that
exact question, "Isn't it illegal to use military on civilians?"
uh, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and all of 'em have replied, "No we
didn't, really. We just used the equipment. We didn't use the
*people*. There's no active duty military in the tanks..."
HARDER: Hang... Whoa, whoa, whoa. Slow down... Who flew the
helicopter?
THOMPSON: That's... Well, see, that's a lie! What they have told
our congressmen is a lie and I can prove it. But until we went
out to get... We had to first get their response, all right? And
see what their story was going to be so we would know what
evidence to go get to prove they're lying. So, so they came back
and said, "Well we didn't really use military. We used just the
equipment." They claimed FBI agents were driving the tanks and
they claimed FBI was flying the helicopters. We now have film
footage that proves that's an absolute lie. They did have active
duty military in those tanks. They had active duty military
flying the helicopters. And they had active duty military on the
ground in a much greater capacity than merely advisory.
And even if they weren't, I don't care. A rose is a rose is a
rose. I don't care who's driving those tanks. If you've got a
*tank* in somebody's front yard, it's a military assault. Tanks
are only for war.
HARDER: All right. Now, one would think that a helicopter
gunship, a helicopter fitted with a machine gun, would be
essentially a military *war* item, would you not?
THOMPSON: Yeah. Customs has 'em. Isn't that a fascinating little
factoid? Why do so many of our... Did you know that every
government agency right now has its own SWAT [Special Weapons And
Tactics, a police unit with military characteristics] team?
Including the Post Office? And the forestry service? They all
have a SWAT team.
HARDER: What are they planning to "swat"?
THOMPSON: Us, best I can figure.
HARDER: Now we know that there have been a number of terrible
tragedies. Like the Scott case, for instance, uh, where,
essentially, the government... Have you studied the Scott case?
THOMPSON: Um-hmm. [Affirmative]
HARDER: All right. What was *that* all about? I know we're gonna
digress a moment, away from Waco, but that was another case where
something "happened". The government invaded this guys house!
THOMPSON: Scott's property was "smack dab" in the middle of a
national forest. He owned the last little piece of property that
the government didn't have yet. And it was literally surrounded
on all four sides; I mean, he was an island in the middle of a
national forest.
One of the things that we've investigated is FINCEN -- that's the
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. And this ties to the Scott
case because, I think... and then it ties to a *lot* of these
cases. I think it's important for people to know what it is.
FINCEN is a 92 computer data bank center, out of [unclear],
Virginia, operated by the government. And the whole purpose of
FINCEN is information gathering and keeping it in these databases
in a way that is interactive. They've asked that all government
agencies, *every* government agency -- including county, city,
state, it doesn't matter -- hook into this computer data bank.
And when I called, I spoke to the executive director. (At the
time, his name was Andy Slodine(?). And the new guy's name is
Gardner. But I was talking with Andy Slodine.) I said, "What is
FINCEN? What do you do?" They have information on everybody in
this country. They can pull up your customs records. They can
pull up your IRS records, your credit bureau reports, your car
tag number, your VIN number, your property records. Anything
about you that's ever been computerized, they have it.
HARDER: Um-hmm. [Indicates he understands]
THOMPSON: Now they also have a group called OCDETF(?), the
Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force, out of Washington,
D.C.
I found out that both FINCEN and OCDETF are operated by
Department of *Treasury*! Not the Drug Enforcement Agency, not
Department of Justice -- but the *Treasury* Department. Which is
really very interesting, because Treasury was never intended to
be a law enforcement body.
HARDER: All right, hang... Let's, let's leave it right there, for
2 minutes, and we'll come right back. Linda Thompson, our guest.
Don't go away.
(to be continued)
---------------------------<< Notes >>---------------------------
{1} As to Thompson's assertion that the use of military on
civilians in this country is unprecedented, my question would be:
What about the 1968 Democratic convention in Chicago? Both
National Guard and federal troops (including tanks) were used
against the protesters there. Not to say it was right to use
military at Waco (e.g. because there *was* precedent), just that
her assertion that the Waco use of military was unprecedented
seems to be wrong. -- CN Editor.
{2} As to Thompson's assertion that people did not at first
question what was happening at Waco: Perhaps this is generally
true, however forums such as "alt.conspiracy" *did* question the
official version of what was happening right from the start. I am
grateful for the fact that alt.conspiracy was available to me
during the Waco siege. Perhaps if it hadn't been there, I would
have succumbed to the mass media brainwashing. -- CN Editor.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


130
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-17.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 17
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MENA -- ONE MORE TIME
by Brian Francis Redman, Editor-in-chief, Conspiracy Nation
Copyright (c) 1994 -- All rights reserved
I am grateful to one of the readers of "Conspiracy Nation" (CN)
for sending me some clippings from the *Wall Street Journal*
regarding the Mena, Arkansas matter.
Let me begin by saying that I am not a "fundamentalist," don't
belong to the "religious right," and in fact have not seen the
inside of a church for *years*. I have also *never* voted for a
Republican and have actually *always* voted Democratic, except
for the last election when I voted for Perot. So I have voted for
McGovern, Carter, Mondale, Dukakis and should not be considered a
right wing reactionary or whatever.
So this is by way of a preface. I have nothing against Clinton,
except that he is an asshole.
I know we have all heard about Mena, Arkansas and the activities
that were supposed to have gone on down there. (That is, unless
you get your news from the television or from most newspapers, in
which case you probably haven't heard a thing about it.) But
let's just review the situation. Again, I am not part of a
Republican plot against Clinton; I am not part of a Christian
Fundamentalist plot against Clinton. Also, LaRouchies please
note: I am not a British agent. I am just the everyday editor of
a great metropolitan conspiracy column, trying to figure out what
the hell is going on.
So to summarize, we have:
1) During the 1980s, a small airport outside of Mena, Arkansas
was used by the CIA to illegally smuggle arms to the Contras down
in Nicaragua. Nicaragua, for you sports fans, is a country in
Central America. {1}.
2) After delivering weapons to the Contras, many of the pilots
allegedly smuggled cocaine back into the U.S., back to Mena.
According to Edward Jay Epstein, writing in the *Wall Street
Journal*, "This led to the Mena complex being investigated in
1984 by the Arkansas State Police." {2}. But, obviously, *for
some reason*, the investigation never reached full term.
3) A lot of money was flowing into Arkansas as a result of these
activities. This money was laundered through local businesses and
Arkansas banks. "This, in turn, led to an Internal Revenue
Service investigation of the companies involved." {3}.
4) Guess who was the Governor of Arkansas while all this was
going on? Why shucks! None other than that "young man in a
hurry," Beeeel Cleeeenton.
What's that you say? "Why Brian, this is the first I've heard
about this!" Don't feel bad. Most Americans who rely on
television for their news are probably equally uninformed. "The
original report on Whitewater by Jeff Gerth of the New York Times
was ignored for many months. The Mena story probably will suffer
the same fate..." write Bill Plante and Michael Singer of CBS.
{4}.
At this point, I can't help but wonder: Why aren't we hearing
more about this story? It's quite a shocker, the government
selling cocaine to American school children to finance an illegal
operation in Central America -- and with Beeeel Cleeeenton and
Heeeely Cleeeenton in the vicinity. Did they know what was going
on?
Did they know what was going on? Well Larry Nichols, longtime
associate of the Clintons and then-employee of the Arkansas
Development Finance Authority says that *Mr.* Slime, at least,
knew what was going on: "Bill Clinton was involved with people
who gave cocaine away to young girls. Bill Clinton was involved
with people who were laundering drug money." {5}.
Did Bill Clinton allow the CIA to use his state as a "banana
republic" in return for a portion of the money from cocaine
smuggling and money laundering? Here are the ABC's: (A) A *lot*
of money was coming into Arkansas as a result of this CIA
operation; (B) It is alleged by several persons involved with the
operation that Bill Clinton made sure that Arkansas law
enforcement personnel "looked the other way"; (C) So one hand
washes the other -- Arkansas, Arkansas bankers, and Arkansas
businessmen get large cash infusions during the 1980s and in
return, Clinton's troopers, etc. don't get too nosy about what
all those planes are doing at Mena late at night.
As Bill Duncan, a former IRS investigator, put it: Yes,
corruption is involved. Yes, a cover-up has taken place. {6}.
So maybe you think Clinton is innocent. But the real question is,
why isn't there a real investigation going on? Even more than
that, why are so many Americans uninformed about these shocking,
plausible and corroborated charges? It is alleged by many
knowledgable persons, *including former insiders*, that Bill
Clinton permitted and benefited from the smuggling of *millions
of dollars worth* of cocaine into the United States. That is
quite a story. Why haven't we heard about it?
--------------------------<< Notes >>----------------------------
{1} "On the Mena Trail" by Edward Jay Epstein. *Wall Street
Journal*. Sorry, date and page unavailable.
{2} Ibid.
{3} Ibid.
{4} "Still a Strong Scent on the Mena Trail," by Bill Plante and
Michael Singer, CBS News. *Wall Street Journal*, Letters to the
Editor. Sorry, date and page unavailable.
{5} "The Truth Will Set Us Free," by Larry Nichols. *For The
People News Reporter*, May 30, 1994, p. 13.
{6} "Mena Airport: Arkansas' Contra Connection?" *700 Club* Fact
Sheet.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


115
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-18.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 18
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
POTPOURRI
[CN Editor -- I have so much conspiracy type info lying around
that I decided I would have a sort of "grab bag" of info for this
edition.]
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
But the most seductive thing about [drug] prohibition is that it
keeps us from having to confront all the other little addictions
that get us through the day. It's the NutraSweet in the coffee we
use to wash down the chocolate mousse; a dad's "Just say no"
commandments borne on martini-scented breath. "Don't do drugs," a
Members Only ad advises. "Do clothes." Well, why "do" anything?
Why not live more lightly, without compulsions of any kind? Then
there's TV, the addiction whose name we can hardly speak -- the
poor man's virtual reality, the substance-free citizen's 24-hour-
a-day hallucinatory trip. No bleary-eyed tube addict, emerging
from a weekend-long catatonia, has the right to inveigh against
"drugs." [From "Kicking the Big One" by Barbara Ehrenreich.
*Time* magazine, Feb. 28, 1994, p. 70.]
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
This [being made to testify under oath] is the great tiebreaker,
this is the one thing that Bill Clinton has feared since 1988,
and it is the one thing that will force him to resign before he
is exposed for past and present criminal wrongdoing. Bill Clinton
was involved with people who gave cocaine away to young girls.
Bill Clinton was involved with people who were laundering drug
money. Bill Clinton is involved with people who have destroyed
records relative to an ongoing grand jury. Bill Clinton and his
subordinates have obstructed an ongoing investigation. Bill
Clinton has lied about his role and knowledge about the
obstruction. And the greatest sin of all, he has lied to the
American people and to the people of the world. He has lied so
much in fact that our nation is tarnished before world leaders.
[From "The Truth Will Set Us Free" by Larry Nichols. *For The
People, News Reporter*, May 30, 1994, p. 13.]
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
First it was a section of California that wanted to secede, then
Maryland's Eastern Shore; now native Hawaiians say they want
their land, and rights, back. "We're past the point of just
sitting down and begging government agencies for rights to the
land," said a University of Hawaii instructor. "Now Hawaiians are
trying to assert themselves physically." The state has scheduled
a fall referendum on the sovereignty question for descendants of
the original Hawaiians. [From *The Spotlight*, June 20, 1994.]
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Allen Dulles is dead, but that doesn't mean that the idea of
controlling people's minds and behavior is dead, and I still
think that is a goal. And when you look at what I believe is a
tilt for Global Government you see where that would be even more
intensified now. We had gas, for example, this was way back in
the late '50s, early '60s, we had gas that you could use that
could completely change people's desire to fight or to flee. The
army's chemical-biological warfare research labs, I think that
kind of stuff still goes on. They have to have human guinea pigs
to practice on because animals other than human do not produce
the kind of comprehensive results that they need. So when it
comes down to human behavior, they probably take street people.
There are kids missing off the streets of America every year.
Some of them may end up being sold for body parts down in
Guadalajara Mexico, and a few other places for rich people who
don't want to wait in line for organ transplants. And some of
them undoubtedly end up in Satanic rituals. But many of these
ritualistic abuses may really be governmental operations. I think
MK-ULTRA exists today. [Lt. Col. "Bo" Gritz, from an interview in
*Flatland* magazine #10, p. 51.]
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Army documents detailing secret Cold War-era research on
biological warfare will be released, the Pentagon announced.
The Army recently acknowledged that it sprayed zinc cadmium
sulfide, a fluorescent chemical, over Minneapolis and numerous
other areas of the country in the 1950s and 1960s.
Several women who attended a Minneapolis elementary school
that was in the path of the spray in 1953 say they have
experienced health problems including sterility, early cancers,
disabled offspring or miscarriages.
"We're prepared to release everything," Army spokesman Norm
Covert said Wednesday. "That means we have to find it. If we can
find it, we'll release it."
Sen. Paul Wellstone met with Defense Department and Army
officials Wednesday and said they made a "strong commitment" to
full disclosure.
[From the June 16, 1994, Champaign-Urbana *News-Gazette*.]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


164
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-19.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 19
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
RESOLVED: President Kennedy was killed as the result of a
conspiracy.
[Continuation of my transcription of a radio debate which took
place in the Fall of 1993 between Peter Dale Scott and Gerald
Posner. Today, Mr. Scott and Mr. Posner exchange questions.]
MODERATOR: You are listening to "The Assassination of John F.
Kennedy, A Formal Debate," with Gerald Posner and Peter Dale
Scott.
Each of you will now ask alternating questions of the other
participant. Mr. Scott, you have one minute to ask a question.
PETER DALE SCOTT: Mr. Posner has dug out of Warren Commission
archives an Oswald chronology that is in part faked, and at times
faked by Oswald himself. In August, 1963, there was a raid on an
arms cache on Lake Pontchartrain. Now Mr. Posner says that news
stories talked about an armed training camp, but it's important
that this was never mentioned in the news stories. And *yet*,
Oswald went to a man called Carlos Bringuier of the DRE
[Directorio Revolucionario Estudiantil(?)] -- it had been a DRE
training camp whose arms cache was raided. But there was nothing
about this in the press. And Oswald asked... offered to be a
trainer. Bringuier said, "He [Oswald] must have been an agent,
because no one else knew." And not only that, Oswald asked about
organized crime, about La Cosa Nostra. It took us 12 years for
the rest of us to find that they were involved.
How did Oswald know these things?
MODERATOR: Mr. Posner, you have 2 minutes to respond.
GERALD POSNER: I'm surprised at that, Mr. Scott. Because, in
fact, there *had* been extensive newspaper coverage (as you know)
of the raid across the river. [Mr. Scott says something, off
microphone. Inaudible.] Absolutely. There had been extensive
coverage in the *Times-Picayune*.
*And*... very important point: Although I'm not here to defend
Carlos Bringuier, one of the things that you *do* have in your
book (as I'm sure you have issues with statements that I've
made)... In your book you have him [Bringuier] as a member of the
DRE, this anti-Castro group. I just spoke to Bringuier again the
other night on this very issue. It's absolutely not true that he
was a member of the DRE. And he takes great offense at that,
because he was not. It's stated in the book a number of times
that he is. But that is not the organization that he was
associated with.
And Oswald, at the time that he went in to see Carlos Bringuier,
in August of '63, in Dallas, was playing what I call, "the poor
man's intelligence agent." What does Marina tell us? (Although I
know you don't like to *hear* Marina, because you say she's a
liar.) She tells us, in fact, that even at the time he was in the
Soviet Union he said, "I'd love the life of a spy." The Russians,
the White Russians [anti-communist] who were near him in Dallas,
remember a book that said, "How To Be a Spy." He was, as Warren
DeBrueys tells me (one of the FBI agents in New Orleans),
somebody he had seen many times, who had this tendency to want to
be, as he said, "a poor man's intelligence..." He thought he was
intervening in actually being able to get inside his great foes
at this time, the anti-Castro Cubans. His love of Castro was
running high. He was committed to the cause. And by getting
inside Bringuier's group he would enhance his credentials when
eventually he wanted to go to Cuba. By August of '63, Oswald was
committed to going to Cuba because it had been, for him, the "new
nirvana." The Soviet Union was [his dream] when he was 19. And he
left in '59 to find happiness. And the Russians told him,
"Leave," before he killed himself -- something else, of course, I
didn't see in the book [Scott's book] -- but when he tried to
slash his wrists.
He now is ready to go to Cuba to find happiness. But the
difference is that he *doesn't*. He's not able to get into
Bringuier's group; he's arrested a few days later. *It's all on
the record*. And I must tell you that it's very clearly on the
record. So that I find very little question about what happened
in the summer of '63.
MODERATOR: Mr. Posner, *you* now have one minute to ask Mr. Scott
a question.
POSNER: The... Uh, in Mr. Scott's book, it seems to me that the
"deep politics" that he talks about, what in essence is (and
he'll correct me if I'm using not the right terminology)... but
what I view as almost the second government. This secret
government that essentially runs, with a combination of
government officials and intelligence organizations and drug
traffickers and a host of others, um, is almost so powerful that
it's able to do things like the Kennedy assassination and
maintain it as a massive cover-up -- no matter how many people
are involved.
Uh, you say it's not conspiratorially minded, you aren't, when
you approach these subjects. But what I wonder is, is there *any*
assassination, or attempted assassination, that you think was
really done by a lone assassin, in recent American history? Uh,
Martin Luther King, Bobby Kennedy, George Wallace, Huey Long...
Would those all be conspiracies, in your view, or were any of
those lone assassins?
MODERATOR: Mr. Scott, you have 2 minutes to respond.
SCOTT: Well very quickly, let me say that I haven't studied those
other assassinations as much as this one. My mind is *open* to
it, on the basis of what I *have* learned. But I really haven't
any idea.
Uh, I'd like to clarify... because you didn't quite get what I
meant by "deep politics." I actually had a section in which I
said, "No. It is *not* the same as 'invisible government' or
'secret team.'" It is the constant, everyday interaction between
the constitutionally elected government and forces of violence,
forces of crime, which appear to be the enemies of that
government. But in fact, on a workaday basis -- whether it's City
Hall in a city, or the CIA and the Mafia plotting against Castro
-- are, in fact, part of the governance of this society.
And I *agree* that an external conspiracy, whether it was Cubans
or Nazis or even organized crime itself, could *never* have
killed the President and gotten away with it.
But we have ongoing, working relationships between, for example,
organized crime and the police in Chicago. Which meant in a 30-
year period there was not a single organized crime murder [that]
was solved in that city. And I'm saying that this sort of thing,
which people know about and really accept, locally, should be
seen as part of the way in which our country works: that our
country uses violence, and the forces in power use violence. And
although it is a very rare event for people inside the
bureaucracy to use violence against their own president, that is
what I *do* believe happened in 1963. And the reason that it
was -- they got away with it -- is that they have shared so many
other crimes that they got away, with part of the ongoing system.
MODERATOR: Mr. Scott, I have to caution you to try and use your
time better. But, you have one minute to ask Mr. Posner a
question.
(to be continued)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


154
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-20.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 20
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
RESOLVED: President Kennedy was killed as the result of a
conspiracy.
[Continuation of my transcription of a radio debate which took
place in the Fall of 1993 between Peter Dale Scott and Gerald
Posner. Today, Mr. Scott and Mr. Posner exchange questions for
the second time.]
MODERATOR: Mr. Scott, I have to caution you to try and use your
time better. But, you have one minute to ask Mr. Posner a
question.
PETER DALE SCOTT: Um... there was... When Oswald went into the
Soviet embassy in Mexico City, a tape was made of the
conversation. The CIA has lied and lied and lied and lied about
that tape. They said it was destroyed -- 2 weeks later, it
wasn't. Then they said it was destroyed right after the
assassination. But Mr. Slossen(?) of the Warren Commission
staff... And Mr. Posner *believes* in the Warren Commission; he'd
better believe Mr. Slossen when he says he heard the tape in
April of 1964. Members of [Winston] Scott's fam... and the chief
of station have said that [Winston] Scott and his wife listened
to the tape later. James Angleton came down to Mexico City in
1971 [and] took the tape away.
Now on that tape, the man identified himself as Lee Oswald. And
yet, as you say, he was not Oswald. How do you explain this?
MODERATOR: You have 2 minutes.
GERALD POSNER: Ah. But there's, there's a key difference. Uh,
Slossen says he hears a tape. And [Winston] Scott talks about it
later. But *nobody* says -- and this is absolutely key -- there's
not a transcript of it. The man identifies himself as Lee Oswald.
Years later, people say that.
Here's what's important: The CIA... and I'm not here to defend
the CIA. I must tell you. One of the things, one of the things
that Mr. Scott does and others who have criticized the book do,
they say, "Ah. Posner believes everything the CIA does. And since
he supports the Warren Commission's conclusion, he must agree
with that." Absolutely false. I take the CIA at issue for a whole
host of things, including the fact that they distorted evidence
and lied to the Warren Commission, and they were trying to kill
Fidel Castro and they didn't disclose it. And I take them to task
for all the bungling efforts that they do in Mexico City.
*But*. Very importantly (and you know this): They had a picture
of a man in Mexico City that was the wrong person. They thought
they had identified Lee Harvey Oswald. He was about 35 years old,
10 years older than Oswald, husky. He's much taller. It's not
Oswald. It led to *20 years* of speculation, almost, [that] there
was an "imposter Oswald" in Mexico City. That issue has been
dropped recently, now that the Soviets have come out and said,
"Guess what? The Oswald we met with in our embassy is the same
person who was, in fact, in Dallas and arrested in November of
'63." What it *says*, the very real possibility that I raised in
the book, which is that the CIA had not only identified the wrong
person as Oswald (because they didn't have a picture of him), but
they were also having surveillance *recording* the wrong Oswald,
the very same person who was inside the embassy. And that remains
a real possibility to this day.
*But*. I agree with you that one of the last great areas of real
interest here -- when new information has to come out -- is all
the shenanigans in Mexico City. And when I say "shenanigans,"
what I'm talking about is not a plot to kill the President --
that's key -- but the CIA's and the KGB's desperate efforts to
cover up their own sources of information: their informants, the
contacts inside the Mexican embassy, whether they had double-
agents inside the Cuban embassy, how they obtained video
surveillance at the time, and this overwhelming desire of the
intelligence agencies to *protect*... That type of history is
what exactly leads to the type of speculation you have in this
case, that you have sort of looked at and then said, "I see a
conspiracy of murder."
MODERATOR: Mr. Posner, you have one minute to ask a question.
POSNER: O.K. And in my minute I'm just gonna take 30 seconds, the
first 30, to say, Mr. Scott, that he didn't make a conclusion on
the other assassinations. But in his *own book* he says, on page
97, "Behind the deep politics of the Kennedy assassination lie
those of the [Huey] Long assassination." And on page 307 he talks
about the comparisons between Sirhan Sirhan and Lee Harvey
Oswald. So for somebody who hasn't made up his mind, he has some
very interesting statements in the book.
But Mr. Scott, what I really would wonder is (since I don't see
it discussed in this book and I know you have discussed it
before): Why do you feel, *if* Oswald shot at General Walker in
April of '63, (a) you believe the evidence that he shot at
Walker, and (b) why would he have shot at Walker? And the second
part of the question is, Do you believe the evidence that Oswald
shot a Dallas policeman, J.D. Tippit, *after* the assassination?
And if so, why do you believe he killed Tippit?
MODERATOR: Mr. Scott, 2 minutes.
SCOTT: ...General Walker, who... *Somebody* shot at General
Walker. Eyewitnesses said it was *2* people. And if it was 2
people, then Oswald -- if it was Oswald -- then Oswald was not a
"loner."
Whoever shot at General Walker, from about 15 feet away, did not
shoot to kill him. I think they shot to help make him more of a
martyr than he already was. The bullet in question, I will remind
you, it *changed jacket*. It may have been copper-jacketed in
November, but the bullet was originally identified, then, as
being steel-jacketed. And I do believe that the bullets were
changed, because I think it is not hard *at all* to find other
cases of the falsification of evidence in that and other matters.
Now the killing of Tippit: Um, again, I believe there's
falsification. The bullet thing is difficult to go into, but I
think they rather botched the planting of bullets at the scene.
Um, you believe the eyewitnesses like Helen Markum(?) and Warren
Reynolds. Let me just say, Warren Reynolds was asked if he could
recognize Oswald. He said that he was unable to do so. *And then
somebody shot him through the head*. And then the Warren
Commission had the gall to ask him again. And he said, "Oh yes! I
remember now. It was Lee Harvey Oswald."
Well if you're going to rely on witnesses that have been coerced
in that way, I think you're prepared to grasp at almost any straw
in really conceding that there was no case.
MODERATOR: You will now each have 6 minutes to close. Mr. Scott,
you have 6 minutes.
(to be continued)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


130
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-21.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 21
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
RESOLVED: President Kennedy was killed as the result of a
conspiracy.
[Continuation of my transcription of a radio debate which took
place in the Fall of 1993 between Peter Dale Scott and Gerald
Posner. Today, Mr. Scott gives his closing statement.]
MODERATOR: You will now each have 6 minutes to close. Mr. Scott,
you have 6 minutes.
PETER DALE SCOTT: The Warren Commission, and again, now, Mr.
Posner, tell us that Ruby and Oswald each were people who acted
alone. What I've learned in my years is that each of these two
individuals take us to very important institutional secrets that
are part of what I call the "deep politics" of this country.
To start with Jack Ruby: He came out of Chicago, in the 24th ward
of Jake Arvey, which was a signal point of corruption in the
Democratic party in Chicago and in the nation. A man called James
Ragen was killed in 1946. Oswald {1} knew the two assassins
intimately. One of them was used by the Chicago FBI to make the
case that Oswald {2} is not mob connected. They said that this
man Dave Yaras... They sent this memo out and it was sent on to
the Warren Commission: "Dave Yaras says that Oswald was not mob
connected." They granted that Dave Yaras knew Oswald, but [what]
they didn't say was that Dave Yaras was a *top* syndicate killer
and that the killing of Ragen in 1946 (which he was guilty of)
was one which [J. Edgar] Hoover was personally involved in. And
we have it from one of Mr. Posner's own sources in the FBI that
it was Hoover himself who dropped the investigation when Mr.
Ragen was investigated. I have a [unclear] of that case, because
it is a signal event in the evolution of organized crime in this
country.
Lee Harvey Oswald, in 1963, was involved with the *most*
conspiratorial Cuban anti-Castro group (such as Alpha-66), whose
main target by then was not so much Castro as Kennedy. Their...
most of their raids were against Soviet ships in order to
embarrass Kennedy's policy of detente with Kruschev. And the kind
of story that Mr. Posner will *not* tell you is that a Dallas
sheriff had said that Oswald had been seen with anti-Castro
Cubans at a Harlandale(?) address in Texas which -- in Dallas --
which he says nothing more about, but which the FBI files show us
was the Dallas headquarters of the Alpha-66 in Dallas and that
they had been buying guns. And at least one of their milieu was
an Oswald look-alike.
It is a symptom that the investigation was mishandled; that this
rather significant lead which corroborates the leads in New
Orleans of Oswald and anti-Castro Cubans, all of whom were arms
trafficking. That is probably the key to why Oswald himself
ordered guns. Because I believe that he *was* working part of the
government's campaign against arms sales.
Now you tell me, Mr. Posner, that Bringuier denies his DRE
connections. Mr. Bringuier has also denied his connections to the
Cuban Revolutionary Council [CRC]. (And I can't remember if that's
in your book, but it's certainly in the Warren Commission.) And
yet I found a Cuban "Who's Who" of Cuban exiles, and it's
*listed* in Mr. Bringuier's biography, in print, that he was the
propaganda secretary for the CRC -- as I report in my book. (And
I hope you have a refutation of it.)
If we had more time, I would respond to what you said about my
book. But yes, all of these things are part of the deep politics.
But they could also have been lone assassins. You're drawing
conclusions that cannot be drawn.
What I have been trying to say and say is that the more we look
into the, this case, pressure has forced the FBI to "cough up"
files. The... forced just recently, the CIA to force up files.
And the more documents we get, the less and less and less Oswald
looks like a loner. If he was a loner, why did every single junky
FBI report on him go over to CIA and get read in at least 10
sections of the CIA? Why are there references that are still
blacked out? Why are so many of the crucial documents suppressed?
We have a record here which we have to get to the bottom of. And,
uh, I am open-minded about this. I don't quite know how you prove
someone is a loner after you have already established that
there's such intense and continuous government interest in him --
including documents we've been denied which are only one and two
days before the assassination.
But I can tell you one thing: When the CIA called him Lee Henry
Oswald it wasn't from a clumsy accident, as you suggest. Because
they had been doing it consistently for 3 years in a file which
had been... treated him as a *secret* case, when other defectors
were treated as unclassified ones. He was a very special
"defector" among those defectors. And the CIA falsified not only
his name [but] the name of his wife, the name of the city in
which he was born. The conclusion is unmistakable that he was
part of some kind of operation that was being kept secret even in
CIA files. And if you're going to prove me wrong, Mr. Posner,
you're going to have to join with me in getting the rest of the
files declassified.
MODERATOR: Thank you, Mr. Scott. Mr. Posner, you have 6 minutes.
(to be continued)
--------------------------<< Notes >>----------------------------
{1} Mr. Scott *says* "Oswald" here. He may *mean* "Ruby". Due to
pressure of allowed time, Mr. Scott may have inadvertantly mixed
the names.
{2} Again (see note #1, above), Mr. Scott *says* Oswald, but may
have meant to say "Ruby."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


162
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-22.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 22
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
RESOLVED: President Kennedy was killed as the result of a
conspiracy.
[Final portion of my transcription of a radio debate which took
place in the Fall of 1993 between Peter Dale Scott and Gerald
Posner. Today, Mr. Posner gives his closing statement.]
MODERATOR: Thank you, Mr. Scott. Mr. Posner, you have 6 minutes.
GERALD POSNER: The last statement Mr. Scott makes is one that,
uh, one of the few things tonight that we can agree on and agree
on wholeheartedly, which is, getting the files.
I happen to think that one of the things that's happened in this
case is the government is its own worst enemy. They're holding
onto material for 30 years, in instances, because there *is* a
cover-up in the Kennedy assassination. I say this in so many
words in my book. There's a cover-up of the government
incompetence that took place in both the FBI and the CIA. There's
a covering of *behinds*, in essence, of these bureaucrats who are
running for cover. And the FBI, because they were so petrified
that J. Edgar Hoover would be coming down to Dallas and saying,
"What? You had an open file on Lee Harvey Oswald? You were
interrogating his wife and you didn't know he was a 'lone nut'
capable of killing the President?" And of course, Hoover *did*
censure 17 agents and discipline them for that very thing that
the agents feared. They destroyed evidence. They lied about what
happened. And that's what, largely, those files are gonna show.
They will show the *extent* of that cover-up. The difference is
in the interpretation that we have as to whether, in fact, it was
the cover-up of a *murder* (which I don't view it as that), or
what I typically view in this case, from the... my alma mater
where you are now a professor, at Berkeley, from my work in the
early '70s as a political scientist, that, in fact, government is
primarily inefficient and bungling. And this is exactly what you
expect in a case of this magnitude, where people *do* run.
The... some of the things that are mentioned... I think it comes
down again to this very, very fundamental look at "What is the
evidence?" And I think that Mr. Scott says 2 things in his last 6
minutes segment that really shows you the basis of what happens
in conspiracy theory. If there isn't an answer for it, what you
do is you speculate and say, "Here's what might have happened."
And this is what Oliver Stone does very effectively in his film,
"JFK."
On the Walker shooting, Mr. Scott says, "Well I think that the
bullet was swapped. It's not the same bullet that existed in
'63." The problem is that there's no evidence that it was
swapped. So his point is, what *might* have been swapped. We
can't prove that it wasn't. And of course, you can never prove
that... the negative, that the bullet wasn't swapped. But what I
ask for always, as an investigator, as an attorney, is -- just
show me a piece of credible evidence to indicate that that
happened. And that's what, what he can't produce.
He talks about the Tippit shooting. And he says that he thinks
that the police actually botched the planting of the bullets at
the scene. But again: it's strictly speculation. There isn't any
evidence. There's no testimony. There's nothing to indicate that
in fact the police had *planted* the bullets at the scene. And
this is where we go from hard evidence off to what I call
speculation. The Tippit case is a perfect example.
And I must tell you that, as an attorney, it's one of the most
"open and shut" cases I've ever seen. *Thirteen* eyewitnesses --
not just the two that he wants to talk about with Helen Markum(?)
and Warren Reynolds (and each of those I could respond to) --
thirteen eyewitnesses see Oswald either do the shooting [of
Tippit] or escaping from the scene. Six people pick him out of a
lineup that night. He's discovered a few blocks away, with the
pistol. It is tied ballistically into the murder of Tippit, to
the exclusion of any other gun in the world. How he ends up in
*that* theater, with the pistol that just killed Tippit, where 13
people just saw him running away, is hard for me to imagine. Is
it an imposter Oswald? Has somebody coerced all 13 people? Did
they put the pistol on him and he didn't know it? You know, the
answer is, in fact (although I see Mr. Scott nodding "yes"),
it's too much to imagine. He, in fact, *did* kill J.D. Tippit.
He, in fact, *did* shoot at General Walker. And he *was* the only
person in Dallas, November 22nd, 1963, on the 6th floor, in the
southeast corner of the Texas school book depository -- not only
with the motive to kill Jack Kennedy (to place himself in the
history books; to throw this "monkey wrench" into the system) but
with the capability of doing it. With his *own* rifle which was
found up there. That he used to sit on a porch, according to
Marina, and for hours at a time practice "dry runs," what experts
call "dry runs." Operating the bolt action so that he was
proficient with it. *And* with the capability. In the marines,
having been both a sharpshooter and a marksman. Meaning that he
was capable of hitting a 10-inch target at a distance of 200
yards, 8 times out of 10, without the benefit of a telescopic
sight.
And in Dallas, the assassination targets are less than *half* of
that distance. His longest shot is some 90 yards, and he has the
benefit of a 4-power scope. It becomes for Oswald an easy
sequence of shots. And even then, only one of them actually does
the trick and ends up killing Kennedy.
The... One of the very important points, I think, in this, is
when we come down to the question of association with these
individuals, uh, I believe that as the American people have a
right to demand, after 30 years of looking at this case, we have
a right to demand of anybody, "What's your evidence to support
your conclusions?" I lay out a scenario of what I think happened
in the assassination. I presented the evidence: some 80 pages of
source notes, the evidence that I rely on. What I think we have
to ask conspiracy theorists in this case -- whether they have Mr.
Scott's view or whether they have a different view of what
happened -- is, "What do you rely on?" "What's your proof?"
"What's your documentation?" This case has been examined more
extensively, by more researchers, than any other case I know of.
And after 30 years of thousands of people looking at the evidence
and talking to witnesses, we still don't have an iota of credible
evidence to show us, in fact, there was a conspiracy to kill Jack
Kennedy. I say that it's time to "close the book" on this case in
the sense that we still have more *historical* work to do, but we
can come to the overall conclusion that, in Dallas, as we
approach the 30th anniversary of this death, the man responsible
for it was one man, alone: Lee Harvey Oswald.
MODERATOR: Thank you, Mr. Posner.
Mr. Scott, Mr. Posner, on behalf of our listeners across the
country, thank you very much.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
CN Editor -- At various times in this transcription of the
Scott/Posner debate, I was tempted to interject my own comments.
However, I tried to avoid doing this as much as possible.
At this point, I am tempted to write my own commentary on this
debate and post it in a future issue. I may or may not do so. If
I do, I may include any comments, info, etc. that I receive from
readers regarding the Scott/Posner debate. If you have any
material, pro or con, that you wish to send regarding this
debate, now is the time to send it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


167
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-23.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 23
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SPAIN: OUR NEIGHBOR TO THE PAST
This is not dealing with conspiracy *per se*. But it is
tangentially related.
In *The Great Reckoning*, authors James Dale Davidson and Lord
William Rees-Mogg show how world economic dominance has moved
from Spain, to Holland, to Great Britain, and finally to the
United States. Speaking of the glory days of old Spain (approx.
1525 to 1625 A.D.), they write:
There is no better example of a nation that underwent an
imperial crisis of costs and spent itself into oblivion
than Spain, the great power of the early modern period.
Leadership of the Spanish government was totally
dominated by tax-consuming interests: the military, the
bureaucracy, the church, and the nobility. Long after it
became obvious that the Spanish economy was in trouble,
Spain's leaders resisted every effort to cut costs. Like
American politicians today, they could not believe that
the money would ever run out. Each new setback to the
economy was treated as an occasion to launch a grand new
program. Taxes were tripled between 1556 and 1577.
Spending went up even faster... By 1600, interest on the
national debt took 40 percent of the budget. Spain
descended into bankruptcy and never recovered.
This period of Spain's economic dominance is known as the "Siglo
de oro," the "Century of gold." One result of its exploration and
colonization of the New World was that Spain began to import a
*lot* of gold. What follows will give you more details on Spain,
our neighbor to the past.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
[From *La civilizacion espanola* by Diego Marin. Edicion
revisada. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1969. Translation
by Brian Francis Redman, Editor-in-chief, Conspiracy Nation.]
The Economic Crisis
-------------------
One of the most significant paradoxes of the Spanish empire
during the *siglo de oro* is the chronic state of economic crisis
in which it lived, beneath its grandiose splendor. In spite of
the gold and the silver coming in from the Indies, the Exchequer
was always in debt to foreign bankers and the national economy
became less and less productive. The military obligations of the
empire brought with them an increase of expenses in excess of
revenues, so that the preoccupation of the government became that
of obtaining money at whatever cost, using urgent means that in
the long run ruined commerce and industry -- all the while never
comprehending that the true cure of economic woes lies in
increasing national production. That was the price paid by Spain
upon converting itself into an imperial monarchy and keeping its
own material interests subordinated to interests not always
national.
The financial difficulties had begun already under the reign of
Carlos V and they kept increasing during subsequent reigns, up
until the point where Felipe II declared bankruptcy three times.
The economic protectionism that had been initiated with so much
success by the Catholic kings had to be abandoned in order to
satisfy foreign capitalists that had approved loans to the
Emperor, who gave them as security for the loans the collection
of future taxes, the privilege of buying raw goods (such as wool,
iron, etc.), and of selling their manufactured products in Spain.
With this foreign competition, the development of local commerce
and industry was diminished, as it was also in other European
countries.
The other factor that contributed the most to the weakening of
the Spanish economy was precisely the gold and the silver so
providentially discovered in the Indies during the formation of
the empire, but which served only to pay back the foreigners that
had loaned money to the Crown or that sold manufactured goods to
the Spaniards. The sudden arrival of those precious metals
produced an inflation that revolutionized prices in all of Europe
by increasing the amount of money in circulation in greater
proportion than the amount of disposable goods. But the rise in
prices began first and rose most in Spain which had converted
itself into a country with the unfavorable balance of importing
more than it exported (because they had the money to pay well),
but where the prices were too high for them to be able to export
their own products. This slowed down even more the development of
the nascent Spanish industry. (The salaries in Spain were double
those in France and England. Thus, products produced in foreign
lands could be sold more cheaply than products produced in Spain.
Thereby, industrial development in these foreign lands was
favored -- at a cost to industrial development in Spain.) Even
the commerce from the Indies, the main source of income for the
Spanish, was diminishing since the second half of the 16th
century and was passing into foreign hands, either legally or as
contraband, until the supposed Spanish monopoly of colonial
commerce represented only 5 percent of the commerce of the Indies
at the end of the 17th century. For its own part, the greater
portion of the American treasure never even made it to Spain,
decreasing in little more than half a century from 35 million
pesos to 3 million pesos.
In the 17th century, faced with the failure of previous financial
remedies, other means were sought. Instead of new loans that only
increased the national debt and which were, at any rate, harder
and harder to obtain due to falling confidence in the state...
instead of imposing new taxes on a population already taxed to
the limit... Spain resorted to the expedient of devaluing the
money, giving to its copper coins the value that, of old, was
given to its silver coins. The treasury increased more than 100%
by this operation, but the gold and the silver disappeared from
circulation and the economy suffered from renewed inflation that
increased the cost of production. And when, to halt the
inflation, the nominal value of the money was lowered, that only
served to increase the economic disorder. The insecurity felt by
such fluctuations in the value of the money tended to paralyze
the economy even more, until around 1680 there was a complete
collapse of prices and a depression that left businesses with
neither merchandise nor money and the royal family without the
financial resources to take its summer vacation. In the end the
government could do nothing, which resulted in being the best
possible policy because at least it wasn't disturbing the
economic life.
Finally, we ought not to forget that the Spanish mentality of the
time contributed to this economic decadence. As a Florentine
ambassador observed at the beginning of the 16th century, the
Spanish "do not dedicate themselves to commerce, considering it
to be beneath them, because all of them have in their heads
certain airs of nobility." This prejudice against mercantile and
industrial labor was not just limited to the nobility, as in
other nations, but was spread to the other classes. The bourgeois
saw in the noble his social ideal and tried to obtain royal
titles for his children (not only for vanity, but for the
extension of taxes and other privileges.) As a proverbial phrase
from those times indicates -- *Iglesia, mar o casa real* (Church,
sea or royal house) -- the Spaniard aspired to be either priest,
conqueror or bureaucrat, not businessman or factory owner. That
is to say, he preferred to gain riches and honors by the effort
of his sword, or to live by a salary that, although modest, gave
prestige. At the end of the 17th century, the government, alarmed
by the decrease in industry, tried to rehabilitate the social
concept of work, declaring that the making of fabrics was not
incompatible with nobility; but such a revolutionary idea did not
begin to produce effects until a century later under the new
Bourbon regime.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


175
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-24.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 24
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[From an interview with Linda Thompson on the *For the People*
radio show, Feb. 11, 1994. Host is Chuck Harder.]
[Continued...]
CHUCK HARDER: Linda Thompson is our guest. And Linda, you were
talking about FINCEN and O-S... OSEDEF?
LINDA THOMPSON: OCDETF. Yeah.
HARDER: OCDETF [Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force], and
the Treasury, and how it ties to who?
THOMPSON: Scott. And some of these other cases.
HARDER: Well, let's hear it.
THOMPSON: All right. FINCEN is the 92 computer data bank center
that has all this information about all of us. They're using...
Government agencies are supposed to all hook into it. Every
single state has a liaison officer for FINCEN who works for the
state patrol. So the first thing anybody investigating this
should do...
HARDER: Um-hmm. [Understands]
THOMPSON: ...is find out who *their* liaison officer is with the
state patrol in their state. Um... But... What I found most
interesting was that both of these organizations operate under
Treasury, not under the Department of Justice. Treasury is not a
law enforcement body. It never was intended to be. It got that
way only through the corruption that has occurred with the ATF.
Originally the ATF was formed as a tax enforcement agency for
bootleggers. They were supposed to enforce payment of liquor
taxes,...
HARDER: Um-hmm. [Understands]
THOMPSON: ...that's all. They're a tax collection agency. Same
thing for the IRS.
Well we all know how now the IRS and ATF, both, have goon and
thug squads that go out, break in people's doors, and essentially
commit mayhem across the country as if they are some sort of law
enforcement agency -- *which they are not!*
Um, but in any event, this OCDETF interested me quite a bit and I
found out that they have agents of the IRS that fly with OCDETF
that first identify assets of people -- for instance, drug
dealers. They use the FINCEN computers to identify assets; they
have IRS go with them, to point them out when they make the raid.
The first time FINCEN was used was to identify all the assets of
Iraq in this country. And then those assets were seized. You
might remember that from a few years ago.
HARDER: Um-hmm. [Affirmative]
THOMPSON: So I would think it's very important to the
understanding of the Scott case to realize that we have a
government that is targeting assets that they want, *first*,
before they do raids on people!
HARDER: Well now we know also, there's been some investigation in
the Scott case, and I believe it was a newspaper out there was
amazed that they found out that the multi-jurisdictional forces
even had gotten a property appraiser to tell 'em what Scott's
property was worth before they went in and raided him!
THOMPSON: Well OCDETF *is* the multi-jurisdictional task force.
HARDER: O.K.
THOMPSON: Because they are the primary agency of that. Because
they're under Treasury department. They *do* fly the black
helicopters. They have IRS agents on the helicopters with them
and, apparently, Drug Enforcement Agency agents.
HARDER: All right, all right. So they killed Scott.
THOMPSON: Um-hmm. [Affirmative]
HARDER: And what's the bottom line with that case now?
THOMPSON: No apologies. They killed him.
HARDER: That's it.
THOMPSON: That, and the property is in limbo. His wife has had a
lot of problems trying to fight what has gone on around it in
terms of seizure. They originally seized the property as if it
was a drug asset.
HARDER: Um-hmm. [Understands]
THOMPSON: Um, and so far as I know, they haven't been successful
in keeping it. Because they didn't... *Now* we have a Supreme
Court ruling that says you must *first* convict the person of a
crime before you can seize their property as a drug asset.
HARDER: Right. Right.
THOMPSON: You also have the "innocent purchaser" protection,
which I think his wife would fall under. Because that property
was in her name as well.
So. But what you're seeing is a government agency that's *using*
this FINCEN to *target* properties that they want to steal,
essentially. And then coming up with some sort of bogus way to
raid the property.
This is applicable to the Branch Davidians as well. *Their*
property is in the middle of property owned by a guy named
Perry(?). Perry has wanted their property for years, and in fact
was able to get -- before Koresh came there -- he was able to get
about 900 acres of it. There is supposed to be a "bullet train"
that runs through that part of Texas, through Waco, directly
through the Branch Davidian's property, that would essentially
make it worth millions of dollars when that goes through.
So there were a lot of potential profit motives involved as well
in targeting the Branch Davidians.
HARDER: In other words: These people are in the way; let's get
rid of them.
THOMPSON: Uh-huh. [Affirmative]
There were a lot of people after David Koresh for different
reasons. He had disgruntled former members that were trying to
oust him. He had government people that wanted his property. He
had a neighbor that wanted his property...
HARDER: In other words, this is kind of a new method of "eminent
domain."
THOMPSON: Um-hmm. [Affirmative] Absolutely.
HARDER: [Bursts out laughing]
THOMPSON: And you know, the king is sovereign. It's not really
new. They used to do this in feudal times. If the king wanted
property, he'd send his henchmen in to, you know, cut your head
off and take your property.
HARDER: So that's what we're doing now, only we're calling it
"justice."
We'll be right back with Linda Thompson and more on Waco. Don't
go away.
(to be continued)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


119
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-25.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 25
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[CN Editor -- I cannot vouch for the accuracy of *all* of the
following. It may or may not be true, I just don't know.]
[The following is a transcript of a recorded phone message put
out by a group in Chicago called "Citizens' Committee to Clean Up
the Courts [CCCC]." (312) 731-1100 and (312) 731-1505.]
Hi! Sherman Skolnick, Citizens' Committee to Clean Up the Courts,
9800 Oglesby.
Crooked federal judges do not die soon enough.
Federal judges are appointed for life. By the Constitution,
they're supposed to sit during so-called "good behavior."
Congress only *rarely* has impeached judges, and *that* mostly
because they antagonized vested interests.
Federal judgeships are bought and sold like a valuable trophy. In
Chicago, the current corruption price is $1 million for a chair
in the U.S. District Court. For a chair on the Federal Appeals
Court here, the sky is the limit!
The Appeals Court, one step below the high court in Washington,
is the end of the line for most federal cases.
Many federal judges are appointed young enough so that they sit
for 30 to 40 years, scratching out their decisions like a knot in
their underwear.
While the FBI and the Justice Department may accuse a small-time
*state* court judge of corruption, federal judges are granted a
pass by law enforcement and by the news fakers. Yet as we [CCCC]
have shown for 30 years in and out of the courthouse, the major
bribery is in the *federal* court.
For example, in 1969 the chief judge of the U.S. District Court
here, William J. Campbell, obtained millions of dollars by
corrupt means, using part of it to build a skyscraper downtown.
His rotten picture has a place of honor in the federal jail here,
and the federal court law library is named after him.
Then we come to the example of federal district judge George W.
Lindbergh. *Previously*, he was an Illinois state appellate
judge. In a hearing watched by bankers nationwide, judge
Lindbergh favored Northern Trust Company of Chicago, making it
virtually impossible to sue banks for lender's liability --
wrecking small and medium business borrowers. A few weeks later,
his backers, with a million dollars and more, bought him a chair
on the federal district court here.
Judge Lindbergh has sought to "plough under" one of the most
important, unpublicized cases: The Joseph Androcetti(?) affair.
Lindbergh was corrupted by First National Bank of Cicero, run by
Paul Marcinkas(?), mafia boss that headed the Vatican bank.
Also corruptly influencing judge Lindbergh has been Household
International and their units, Household Banks -- successor to
the Nugan-Hand Bank of Australia, notorious CIA laundry.
*But*, judge Lindbergh has prostate cancer. So, he may not be
sitting for decades and decades scribbling his poisonous rulings,
favoring gangster banks and big corporate swindlers and "high-
class" criminals of all kinds.
Some contend judge Lindbergh is becoming a "canary," singing
about the bribery and corruption he has been a part of. His
deathbed confessions how federal cases are "fixed" may shake the
Dirksen Building, the federal courthouse here. (By the way, since
the glass is sealed, an exposed, corrupt judge cannot jump out
the window... hah-hah.)
As judge Lindbergh may well be confessing, judgeships are bought
and sold, bribes are "washed" through banks here (like the
Continental Bank, with offshore units), court transcripts are
"faked up," *and* judges reportedly meet in secret with lawyer
"fixers," like Meyer, Brown and Platt(?), fronting for the
bankers. (That law firm, by the way, reportedly bought judge
Lindbergh his federal judgeship.)
For now, Lindbergh's office has been (312) xxx-xxxx. *But*,
cynics say we may soon leave a message for judge Lindbergh care
of a mortuary in Crystal Lake.
But then, crooked federal judges do not die soon enough.
In Chicago, see us on cable tv, channel 21, 9 pm [cst] most
Monday evenings.
Play it again: The Death of Reporters. (312) 731-1505.
New message Friday; we change it several times a week.
Donations appreciated. Citizen's Committee to Clean Up the
Courts, 9800 South Oglesby, Chicago, [Illinois] 60617. For the
latest on courts, banks, espionage agencies, political
assassinations, and the news media. On 24 hours a day.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


167
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-26.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 26
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
NOT UNDERSTANDING $$ DEALS DOESN'T STOP DEALERS
By Martin Mann
From *The Spotlight*, June 27, 1994
"Derivatives" has been a term often seen -- but never fully
explained -- in recent financial news. Yet no matter how remote
and intricate, these financial instruments require a closer look,
if only because they have been costing American taxpayers
billions -- over $50 billion in the past 12 months, according to
one estimate -- and now threaten the entire U.S. economy.
Total derivative contracts outstanding at the beginning of June
-- including contracts traded on the futures and options
exchanges and over-the-counter derivatives -- has been estimated
by *Fortune* magazine at $16 trillion (the gross domestic product
of the U.S. is a comparatively piddling $6.4 trillion). But this
figure is based on the "underlie," i.e., the money involved in
the contracts. Even *Fortune* admits that the figures are
somewhat arbitrary, since the dollar value of the contracts is
only one way to measure the market. The contracts themselves
control vast chunks of cash, much larger than their so-called
"notional" value.
But it is all "off the books," with no way for anyone -- the
government or the traders themselves -- to confirm any figure.
Meanwhile, George Soros, known as the "derivatives king," says he
lost several hundred million in trades last year, while some
published sources are saying he won $1.1 billion. "There's simply
no way to know," said a Wall Street source. "There are no
figures; no paper trail; no way to check anyone's claims good or
bad."
Derivatives are financial instruments so convoluted and
manipulative that even the sharpest speculator, such as George
Soros, who has used them to gamble -- and win -- billions on
global currency trades claims he does not understand just how
derivatives work.
Yet the basics of derivatives are simple: "Take two businessmen,
Luke and Lance, and assume that each has borrowed $100,000 to
invest in a real estate deal," explained veteran Wall Street bond
trader Hugh Diericks. "The terms of their loans are different,
though. Luke pays fixed interest on what he owes, while Lance's
I.O.U. draws interest at what is called a 'variable' rate --
let's say it follows the fluctuations of the prime rate."
Both men are concerned about the inherent risk of interest rate
shifts, but in opposite ways. "Luke hopes that over time,
interest rates will go up, or at least stay even, because
otherwise he risks paying too much on his fixed rate obligation,"
related Diericks. "Lance, on the other hand, is afraid that if
interest rates are inflated, his variable-rate debt will balloon
into a losing proposition."
To "hedge" their investment against such a risk, Luke and Lance
may enter into a contract stipulating that if interest rates
drop, "Luke will be compensated for his loss by Lance," noted
Diericks. "But if interest rates rise and Lance gets clipped, it
is Luke who pays to make good Lance's loss."
Because the payout between the two businessmen depends on --
"derives from" -- the way interest rates fluctuate, it is called
a "derivative" in the financial markets.
Major corporations often turn to such derivative contracts to
hedge the risk to their export revenues raised by sudden swings
in the international currency markets. Insurance companies have
used them as "reinsurance" against unpredictable upsets.
"Derivatives are simply contracts whose value is derived -- the
key word -- from the value of some underlying asset such as
currencies or commodities, or from indicators such as interest
rates," says Carol Loomis, the award-winning business writer and
longtime editor of *Fortune Magazine*. "In many countries they
are legally considered mere gambling debts."
-+- Big Casino -+-
That was precisely the sort of financial instrument speculators,
wheeler dealers, corporate raiders and get-rich-quick fund
managers were looking for in the greed-driven, smash-and-grab
1980s, Wall Street sources say.
As Michael Milken and his circle of predatory junk-bond
manipulators in the Reagan era converted the U.S. into what
analysts now call a "casino economy," other profiteers began to
use complex derivatives to play vast international shell games.
"Most deals involving big stakes leave a paper trail, even if
moved offshore," says financial reporter Gil Mercer. "But
derivatives don't. They are the dream of every money manager who
wants to cover his tracks."
By the same token, derivatives are also "regulatory nightmares,"
warns the knowledgable Ms. Loomis, "They are off-balance-sheet
instruments that obscure what's going on, rather than revealing
it. Concocted in unstoppable variations... they make total hash
out of existing accounting rules and even laws."
With speculation in derivatives becoming the rage on Wall Street,
major firms hired mathematicians and rocket scientists to devise
ever more elaborate computerized variations of such contracts.
The financial markets were swamped with tangled transactions
worth literally trillions of dollars that not even the money
managers understood any longer.
"Let me show you an example," explained Diericks. "At Kidder,
Peabody & Co., one of Wall Street's largest brokerages, now a
subsidiary of General Electric, they recently fired a bond
manager called James Jett. It came as a shock: Jett, head of the
firm's government bond division, was known as a wizard
derivatives trader, who received more than $10 million in pay and
compensation last year for making Kidder some very big paper
profits."
But auditors sent in by G.E. found the lucrative deals reported
by Jett simply didn't exist. "Kidder had to admit that instead of
booking big profits, it had lost $350 million last year on Jett's
derivatives contracts, which were never properly supervised or
audited because no one else at Kidder -- not even the top
managers -- quite understood them," Diericks revealed.
A *Spotlight* survey has found that a number of major Wall Street
investment banks and brokerages, even staid industrial
corporations such as Procter & Gamble, have been hit by similar
heavy losses caused by arcane derivatives deals last year.
"Although he may not find it appetizing... the American taxpayer
ends up eating a large share of these deficits," warned Diericks.
"Take the scandal at Kidder: with the total shortfall in
derivatives trading put at $350 million, the giant brokerage took
an immediate tax credit of $140 million. That estimated revenue
must now be squeezed by the government from other taxpayers, most
likely from you and me."
Can a speculative craze be reined in by regulators, if no one
really understands what makes it run? Rep. James Leach (R-Ohio)
has proposed new legislation, and the establishment of a federal
Derivatives Control Commission toward that end. His initiative is
worth serious -- and urgent -- consideration, financial experts
say.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*The Spotlight*. An alternative newspaper, published weekly. 1
year's subscription, $36. 1-800-522-6292. Visa/Mastercard.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


262
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-27.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,262 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 27
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[From an interview with Linda Thompson on the *For the People*
radio show, Feb. 11, 1994. Host is Chuck Harder.]
[Continued...]
CHUCK HARDER: To order Linda Thompson's new "Waco, the Big Lie
Continues," or "Waco II," if you please, you can call 1-800-888-
9999, around the clock. If busy, keep trying.
Uh, O.K. Let's go ahead. Back with Linda Thompson.
And we've talked about the Scott case, and what we've talked
about is, is there is a potential, underlying desire for assets.
Uh, this was certainly true in the Scott case (this is coming
out, now), and we also know that here in Florida there was a
county in, oh, I'm gonna call it "east central Florida," where
the sheriff's deputies were stopping cars. And if they found
cash, they took it.
You probably heard of that, didn't you?
LINDA THOMPSON: They do that at the airports fairly regularly.
HARDER: Yeah. And so if somebody was travelling and they had cash
in their vehicle and they got stopped, they wouldn't get the cash
back! One lady had been travelling from Georgia, with cash to
help her family that was a victim of hurricane Andrew, and they
grabbed her dough!
So essentially, what we have here is a... Here's my impression,
if I may...
THOMPSON: It's an alternative tax.
HARDER: ...Exact... What we have here is...
THOMPSON: "Fund raiser."
HARDER: ...O.K. What we have is this:
-+- The Harder Statement -+-
We have a country, in my opinion, that is on the road to
national suicide. We are on this road through what I
call "free trade at any price." In other words, we have
moved our factories overseas; we are putting Americans
out of work; the products are being made by 19 cent or
50 cent an hour peasants, in the various countries. The
products then come back into the United States as
consumer goods, [and] are sold at the same price as if
they were made in the USA. The super-elite, whether it's
at Nike or whether it's at General Electric, or
whatever, are able to make *millions* of dollars a year
and make the stockholders happy.
However, the American workers are put out of work and
wind up on welfare. People on welfare can't pay taxes.
So when you have a government now that has lost its tax
base, the only way it can get money (when it's lost its
tax base) is by taking things. What's left?
We saw in the medical industry (and I've talked to a
doctor who essentially admitted this), the medical
industry has survived for many years, one way or
another, from generations of people who had savings. And
when grandma was in the hospital, or grandpa, the last 2
weeks of their life on the respirator, they essentially
sucked up their life savings!
You... Correct?
THOMPSON: Yes, absolutely.
HARDER: ("The Harder Statement" continues)
O.K. So we have had confiscatory medicine. {1}.
Unfortunately, those, those generations of people with
life savings are now disappearing. And the people who
are getting sick today don't *have* any money.
So we have this terrible downward spiral of a country
that has very little manufacturing left. Last week, if
you heard, *442,000* people signed up for unemployment.
{2}. And we have all these re-training programs, but
regrettably there are no jobs. And so, consequently, we
have a country on its way to national suicide. And at
the same time we're doing this, we have all of these
"sideshows" running around, with rogue elements of
governmental agencies, that are killing our own people
and seizing assets!
The problem of it is, -- whether you agree or disagree
(and this is my opinion, based on what I've seen and
read and heard) -- when the government seizes this
stuff, it's only for the moment! They are only "rich,"
in their mind, for the moment. Because the government
never sells the assets for any amount of money, because
of the downward spiral.
Are you with me?
THOMPSON: Yes, I am.
HARDER: In other words...
THOMPSON: You realize the local law enforcement agencies, though,
get to *keep* the cash that they seize. Or at least a large
percentage of it, depending on whether they seized it themselves
or with a federal agency. This is a funding mechanism for local
police departments that can't be beat! They've come up with
equipment they never would have been able to afford to purchase
otherwise. That's why all of 'em *have* SWAT teams now.
HARDER: Yeah, but you see, the nonsense that has happened --
especially in the state of Florida, that, dear Lord have mercy,
it's awful -- not only the murders of the tourists. And of
course, the bad guys in the state of Florida know not to "hit"
Floridians because a lot of Floridians, that are driving, have
got guns!
THOMPSON: Um-hmm. [Affirmative]
HARDER: So the bad guys leave the natives alone and they zero in
on the tourists. And hopefully now that is coming under control.
And Lord have mercy, I hope so. But this other nonsense that's
hit the national press {3} has really hurt tourism in Florida. So
they're killing the golden goose!
Your thoughts.
THOMPSON: They have not been known for their intelligence...
HARDER: No.
THOMPSON: ...best I can tell.
HARDER: No. It's just greed. {4}.
THOMPSON: And it's greed... and it's greed... They're no
different than any other criminal. They're not real bright.
They're just greedy. And that's what we're seeing: We've got
criminals running our government!
And that's my hue and cry. This is the thing I'm trying to
*expose* here: Why are these people... if for no other reason
than the fact that when you're in a position of *trust*, when you
are an elected official, you have a very, a burden of trust and
honesty to your... the people that you're supposed to be serving.
We can prove *conclusively* that every one of our leaders has
just lied to us, directly *LIED* to us. If nothing else, if we
can't prove they've committed murder, rape, robbery, theft,
anything, we can prove they've lied.
So why are they still in office? That's my point. Why are these
*liars* in their jobs?! They should be out.
HARDER: Well, regrettably, I think you know that ever since the
Nixon administration and prior, prior to Dick Nixon, of course,
uh, you had people after him. You had Lyndon Johnson, of course,
and you've got all of these other administrations that have used
"damage control," they call it. They call it "damage control."
Isn't that lying by omission?
THOMPSON: Right, well it's lying, period. And when you
fraudulently... When you misrepresent things to the public
because it might look bad -- you're lying!! And that's what
they've done.
Now one of the things that was... I think the alarm has not been
sounded on, that I think it's important to sound on your show; it
ties into things: Last Thursday, we had Janet Reno, Al Gore,
Cisneros from HUD [Department of Housing and Urban Development],
and Lee Brown gave us the "crime briefing" is what they called
it, on February 4th [1994]. And in that crime briefing, each one
of them presented one piece of information. It was as if, O.K.,
Gore gets up and he says 20 paragraphs. And there's one line in
there that's real important. Then Reno and Bentsen get up. Each
one of them said 15 or 20 paragraphs with *one line* that's
important. But what they all said was, our government is going to
do house-to-house searches in all of the housing projects around
the country; that Cabrini Green and New York had been "test
tubes," "test grounds," for this; and that they're going to use
the Secret Service to go in and inspect light bulbs and exits and
so forth at these projects. And they're going to use the ATF to
do just like they did at Cabrini Green.
And you may remember that. They went in these projects [e.g.
Cabrini Green, in Chicago], they arrested anyone who didn't have
identification, they seized guns. They did illegal searches and
seizures in every single one of those places.
Now what's even *worse* than that, all of them said things like
-- and this is a direct quote from the transcript [of the "crime
briefing"] -- "We're really talking about an entire area of
cities, entire neighborhoods." They are not speaking of limiting
this strictly to housing projects. Housing projects, to me, is
bad enough. The people that live in those projects are citizens,
the same as anyone. They have the same *rights* as anyone. But we
have a federal court that has upheld these searches and seizures
as legal, and they have already said they are going to expand
this beyond the housing projects.
People, that was our warning. That's it. They've laid it on the
table. It doesn't get any plainer what they're about to do.
HARDER: Well, I can remember. There was a little, a little
poem... Or not a poem, but a little dissertation:
First they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up
'cause I wasn't a Jew.
And then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't
speak up because I wasn't a Catholic.
And they came for the trade unionists. I didn't speak
up because I wasn't a trade unionist.
They came for the Communists. I didn't speak up
'cause I wasn't a Communist.
And by the time they came for me, there was nobody
left to speak up.
And that was a... That came out of World War II, at the time
Hitler had the death camps open.
We'll be right back.
(to be continued)
----------------------------<< Notes >>--------------------------
{1} "...we have had confiscatory medicine." Juxtaposed with the
more recent "alternative tax," i.e., confiscatory raids by the
Sheriff of Nottingham and crew.
{2} "*442,000* people signed up for unemployment." *These are
people signing up for the first time.* In other words, 442,000
people *in addition to* those already registered as unemployed.
{3} "This other nonsense that's hit the national press..." i.e.,
police confiscations of cash.
{4} "It's just greed." Worth taking a look at: What is greed?
Excessive acquisitiveness, according to my dictionary. As Kahlil
Gibran writes in *The Prophet*, "What is fear of need but need
itself?"
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


209
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-28.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 28
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ASSASSINATION AS A TOOL OF FASCISM
----------------------------------
BRETT MC CABE: I would like to introduce now, a man who is very
well known as an independent investigator and author. He's worked
for 20 years to expose U.S. government involvement in mind
control and murder. John Judge has also investigated the history
of Fascism and political assassination and cover-up from Nazi
Germany to John F. Kennedy to Jonestown, Guyana. He works to
expose U.S. plans for concentration camps and genocide, here and
abroad. He has had articles published in *Critique*, *Utne
Reader*, *Madness Network News*, and *Overthrow*, and has spoken
on these topics on radio, television, and in public forums since
1968. So, without wasting any more time, I introduce to you, John
Judge.
JOHN JUDGE: Thank you. I started this work, really, in a sense,
when I started to visit the Pentagon library. My parents, my
mother and father, and my aunt who I lived with, worked as
civilian employees in the Pentagon, and they used to take me in
when I was a kid. And by the 6th grade, I had a 12th grade
reading level, because I went to this private school, where they
kind of pushed us. So they would drop me off in the library for
the day, and I used to go through the stuff in there, because I
was, you know, 10-11 years old, nobody seemed to care much what I
was looking at. And I found it pretty interesting.
And one of the things I figured out back then, because I was
interested in UFOs, was that they were really government spy
craft, and not extraterrestrial craft from some other place. And
for those of you who wanted them to be extraterrestrial, maybe a
few of them were. But most of them were a Nazi secret weapon that
was developed in the aerospace caves outside of Berlin, and seen
by GIs when they came in, along with the jet engines. And it was
a technology that was kept secret. Like William S. Burroughs
says, "If this was the Middle Ages, and Magellen was an American,
and we sailed around the planet and found out it was round
instead of flat, we wouldn't tell anybody so we could attack from
the rear."
So, I really began the research and the work there. And I like to
research, I like to read. And I would go to these cocktail
parties in my neighborhood around Christmas time, and the guy
across the street sold all the weapons to Howard Hughes, and the
next door neighbor was CIA, and two doors down was NASA, and
those were my neighbors in Falls Church, VA when I grew up, and
they would get a little stewed, and they'd talk about business.
And I thought it was all pretty strange, but I didn't have any
reason to *question* that there was a secret government, because
I *lived* with that secret government. And you get Bill Moyers
now, and he tells you, "Well, there's a legitimate government,
but from time to time, to do a certain job, they hire a rather
unseemly crew, and sometimes they get a little out of control and
make trouble."
I'd suggest it's the other way around: that the *real* government
are the people that are doing the killing, and that they hire the
people in the three piece suits to stand up and make you think
you've got a democracy in front of you. Don't you think that's
what it is?
See, because the real government kills people, and that's part of
how it stays in power. Now, if you go back to the period at the
end of the Weimar Republic, in the late '20s and the early '30s,
before Hitler rose to power, you'll find a pattern of political
assassinations.
It's depicted, interestingly, in Ingmar Bergman's probably least
distributed film, *The Serpent's Egg*. And, the people that begin
to die are the labor leaders, the political activists, the
musicians. The people who might have an effective public voice,
and might stand against the Fascism, begin to die in large
numbers. And the German police admitted that these were political
assassinations. But they said they couldn't solve them. They
couldn't make the historical link to what was happening, or they
could but were paid not to, like many of the investigations that
we have now in this country: They couldn't solve those murders.
They couldn't hook them to the most obvious suspects, which were
the members of the *Freikorps* from World War I: the trained and
paid assassins from that period, who were helping to pave the way
for Hitler, and for the end of the political opposition there.
And there was plenty of it. I mean there was quite a bit of
socialist/communist organizing in that period. Marx's vision of
the world was that the first countries to make the change would
be these industrialized countries, like Germany, and so most of
the people that were continuing the Bolshevik revolution in those
years move foreward with that.
The idea of the political assassinations and their origins really
go back to 1918. Not that no one was killed earlier; I certainly
don't suggest that. But in terms of what we're dealing with in
the current period, most of this is a reaction to that
revolution, to that change of power there in Russia, and in some
of the other countries, in that period of time, in the early
1900s.
And in response to that there were monarchists, there were
industrialists, there were people that owned a tremendous amount
of wealth, both here in the United States and in the
industrialized countries in Europe, who had a vested interest in
reversing that. Just as Reagan seems so focused on changing the
situation in Nicaragua, there were people then who had very
definite reasons not to want that kind of social change (that
would redistribute wealth, or privilege, or power, to the extent
that it did, or was able to) to happen where they were. They
wanted to maintain their privileges.
And they had societies, they had groups that they formed. One of
them was the Solidarists, made up of a link between the emerging
Fascists and the neo-Nazis. Another core of reactionaries existed
within the Vatican and the Roman Catholic Church: Opus Dei, "The
Work of God," was newly emerging on that scale. And then another
group that had been known as the Knights Hospitaliers, that were
the military arm of the Church during the Crusades, who became
the Knights of Malta. And these were lay aristocracies within the
Church. People that still believed that there shouldn't have been
a Counter-Reformation, that thought that the Inquisition should
have continued. People that used flagellation and hair shirts for
prayer. People sort of like the Christian Right {1} that we
talked about earlier today, with a few more excesses, and a lot
more money.
And, it was in the interests of these people to have stories
about visions of the Virgin Mary coming, to Fatima, in the early
1900s and telling them that God was against communism, so that
the Church would be against communism, and take up that struggle.
{2}.
Elements of the state, and elements of the rich, and the
monarchies that still existed, formed a bond of interest. And, in
large part, one of the motivating people who went around and
collected their monies and their energies, in order to reverse
the revolutionary change in Russia, was Herbert Hoover, who spent
actually more time in Europe than he did in the United States. He
was also later responsible for the formation of the ideas that
led to the National Security Council and the National Security
State.
And part of what happened was that the Romanoff treasury, which
was stolen and secreted out of the country, was then turned
around along with money collected by Hoover and these monarchists
and others to finance the rearmament of Germany, secretly, from
1918 to 1932. And it's that rearmament that then gave them the
impetus to set up the drive to essentially *get back* the Soviet
Union. And only because that drive was defeated at tremendous
human cost -- about 20 million lives in Russia and those
countries, some of the worst killing went on there, and the
civilians also, but tremendous cost -- they were militarily
stopped in 1943.
And, at that point, a different position was taken by some of the
Allied countries. There were divisions within the class as to how
much money should have been expended on these Fascists. There
were others there who supported them, but it was time to regroup.
It was time to back off a little, to try to get what they had
together. The resources were more or less expended in the effort
to set up a permanent war economy, which Charles Wilson from
General Electric talked about. And to go into what they called
the "Cold War," or "low intensity warfare," and genocide against
Third World people, while they continued to build the empire and
maintain the hegemony. And to re-establish the Fourth Reich, the
Fascism, not only here in the United States but throughout the
world. {3}.
(to be continued)
[Transcript of a talk given by John Judge at a one-day conference
entitled "The Fourth Reich in America." A transcript of the
entire conference, "The Fourth Reich in America," is available
from Flatland Books, P.O. Box 2420, Fort Bragg, CA 95437.]
--------------------------<< Notes >>----------------------------
{1} If you belong to the "Christian Right," I apologize for the
possible "Christian bashing" in Judge's statement. Overall, his
talk is worthwhile so I am posting it.
{2} Well, the Church is obviously going to be against communism,
because communism declares that religion is the "opiate of the
masses." So Judge may be wrong here about any Fatima fakery.
{3} Given that the western powers at first financed the Nazis, it
seems strange that we went to war against them. A recent issue of
*The Nation* (ca. June 1994) indicated that D-Day and our
subsequent battle against the Nazis on the western front was more
about grabbing territory that the Russians might otherwise get
than it was about fighting Nazism, *per se*.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


201
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-29.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 29
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ASSASSINATION AS A TOOL OF FASCISM
----------------------------------
(...continued...)
JOHN JUDGE: [...continues...] And part of that involved moving
those Nazis all over the world. Moving those Fascists. And not
all the Germans were Fascists, and not all the Fascists were
German. There were Japanese Fascists, if you remember. Some of
them seem to be still in control today. There was a kind of
veiled threat, recently, from the Prime Minister of Japan, that
the forces that operated in World War II hadn't forgotten what
the U.S. did to them; and that they were ready to rise back up if
we didn't stop messing around on these trade issues for the
international exchange. So the threat of them, you know, is still
there. We talk a lot about Nuremberg, but much less about the
Japanese war crime trials.
And it's known now, for instance, that when MacArthur's group
went in, they found evidence of the POWs being experimented on
with chemical and biological weapons by the Japanese. That they
let all the scientists that did those war crimes off the hook, in
exchange for the information that they could give them about how
the weapons worked. So that, to them, was a fair trade.
Many of those scientists, many of the munitions and aerospace
experts, many of the spies, (about 300 of them, in fact, under
General Reinhard Gehlen, who had headed up Hitler's intelligence
network for the east and the Soviet Union) were brought, from
1943 up until even more recently in the present day, into the
United States and into other countries around the world, South
Africa included. There's quite a bit of collaboration between the
South African government and World War II Fascists and Nazis.
But the Fascism was an indigenous problem in many, many
countries. It didn't just exist in Nazi Germany. There were
groups of Fascists that the Nazis were able to use in many
countries as collaborationist governments.
And the real hidden history of World War II was, in fact, the
*defeat* in many places of those forces by more progressive
elements. By people who were, out of reasons of patriotism, or
out of a more progressive political philosophy, bound and
determined to take back some freedom. And that's a history that
hasn't had as much play as the standard version of the Allied
powers: these empires getting together to defeat these things,
the actual struggles of the resistance to Fascism in the
different countries and what role that played.
Assassination was always a *tool* for them; not only the mass
death, but the individual death of the people that could make a
difference, of the politicians that might make a change, of the
people that stood in the way. And they perfected those
techniques, and those techniques were brought here and used in
the United States. So that when Mae Brussell did her work with
the Warren Commission, and I spent several years reading the
volumes and going into depth (and I went through about 300 cubic
feet of material in the Archives). We *found* those people in the
Commission Record. In key places. And I'll just talk to you about
a few of them, so you can get a sense of who these people are
that I'm talking about, and how they would play in.
One important one is an American, in fact, an American Fascist by
the name of John J. McCloy. McCloy was a Rockefeller banking
lawyer. I saw Marcel Ophuls who did some of the films on the
Nuremburg situation, *The Sorrow and the Pity*, and *Memory of
Justice*, at a public talk. And someone came up and asked him
about McCloy, "Is he connected to the internationals?" And Ophuls
said, "It would be more accurate to say the internationals are
connected to him."
There was a very good article some years ago in *Harpers* about
him, "Minister without Portfolio," that began to go into his
background, all the way back to the 1920s when he was sent over
to Germany to check about World War I sabotage activities, and
ended up friends with some of Hitler's early cronies, and met
Hitler, and stayed in that area for some time. He was connected
to Sullivan and Cromwell, a Rockefeller banking firm that kept
its German investments going even after the mass deaths of the
Jews started in Germany. They had investments there that they
didn't want to back off from.
And McCloy eventually got into a position in the government where
he was the Under-Secretary of War. Somebody pointed out to me
earlier that 1947-1948 is also when we changed from "Secretary of
War," to "Secretary of Defense." {1}. And just that little word
change is enough propaganda to make clear what's happening.
John J. McCloy, among other things during the period when he was
Under-Secretary of War, was responsible, along with Earl Warren
and a fellow named S. Dillon Reed, for the set-up of the Japanese
concentration camps in the United States and the internment of
Japanese, not German or white peoples, but Japanese people here.
A lot of them lived out here in California, and you may know some
of the history of the different concentration camps that were out
here. People lost their property and their money. McCloy still
speaks openly against any reparations for those people, and
believes it was proper that he had them locked up and treated the
way that they were during the war.
And it's interesting also that he worked on that with Earl
Warren, who later shows up *along with McCloy* on the Warren
Commission, to study the investigation of John Kennedy's death.
He's one of the main members of the seven member Committee that
helped to cover up the death of John F. Kennedy.
John J. McCloy also, in his position in the government, blocked
efforts by the Jewish community here in America to have something
done about the Nazi concentration camps. We knew they were there,
we knew where they were. The Jews wanted the camps bombed, or
they wanted the railroads going to the camps bombed, something,
to stop the progress of the machinery of death in the Jewish
community there. And his response at the time was that it would
lead to "reparations against the Jews." One has to wonder what
*they* could have been. But he refused to go along with those
plans.
And then after the war, when we came in militarily, we set up a
fellow named General Lucius Clay, who also cut deals with many of
these top Nazi elements. And then Lucius Clay's military
occupation government was replaced by a transitional, but civil,
government of the Allied powers that would then lead eventually
into the earliest postwar German government. And who oversaw that
transition? McCloy, as the High Commissioner of Germany. In that
position he reversed some of the few convictions that happened at
the Nuremberg trials. Only eight war criminals were sentenced to
death for all the destruction that was done in that war. Only
eight. Some were given prison sentences and almost all of those
were out within a few years, in large part because of McCloy's
intervention.
Of course, the trials were also undermined. One of the key people
that undermined evidence and lost witnesses in that trial,
working with the U.S. Army, was later to go on into the
International Cross, International Rescue Division. And that was
one of a number of agencies; the Vatican also had a line for
this, that provided false identification to the Nazi war
criminals to help them move internationally. And that
International Rescue Committee is still dominated by CIA and
right wing elements. But at that time they were providing the
"Glockenspiel," the false identity cards. And then this fellow
who moved into that position came to Texas. He was with a CIA
front, a foundation called M. Anderson, for many, many years. He
was the special liaison between the Texas police investigation
and the Warren Commission investigation of John Kennedy's death.
And in that capacity he blocked any effective local study of the
death, or local news from getting to the Warren Commission.
And there were a number of years when he was with Anderson. We
don't hear of him. And then he reappears as the "most trusted man
in America," according to the press during the Watergate fiasco,
in order to pardon Nixon. His name is Leon Jaworski.
O.K. So these people move throughout the history. So I'm trying
to give you some feel, or some examples, of how these people
move. McCloy pardons all these key Nazis. He pardons Krupp. He
pardons Dorhnberger. And these other top people are off the hook
because of his intervention. And then, not only do they come
here, but he continues to function right up to the current day. I
mean Reagan, at the time he went to Bitburg, had a White House
ceremony for some of them. The German government came and gave
these awards to John J. McCloy for his excellent work there in
the period when we were supposed to be de-Nazifying Germany. And
in fact, we were leading to the Nazification of the world,
including America.
(to be continued)
[Transcript of a talk given by John Judge at a one-day conference
entitled "The Fourth Reich in America." A transcript of the
entire conference, "The Fourth Reich in America," is available
from Flatland Books, P.O. Box 2420, Fort Bragg, CA 95437.]
--------------------------<< Notes >>----------------------------
{1} Like we are not going to war with Korea, we are going halfway
around the world to *defend* ourselves from Korea. We never
invade other countries; we are just going there to defend
ourselves from them.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


201
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-30.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 30
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ASSASSINATION AS A TOOL OF FASCISM
----------------------------------
(...continued...)
JOHN JUDGE: [...continues...] Another example would be that
scientist I just mentioned, Walter Dorhnberger. He was a General,
and he was responsible, essentially, for helping Werhner von
Braun and the rocket program get whatever it wanted during the
war. He was also responsible for being part of the administration
of the Dora concentration camp, where Jews and other slave labor
were worked to death building, at a tremendous pace, these V1 and
V2 rockets that were being used against the civilian population
in England. And there were heinous examples, besides the level of
the labor and the forced labor, of public hangings and other
types of war criminality there at Dora. And all these people
nowadays either aren't asked... I mean, I think they've got one
sentence in one piece of footage of Werhner von Braun, our
fabulous rocket scientist, *talking* about Dora, saying some
little piece about the conditions in the mines, you know, "...
weren't that bad."
The fact is, that they were there. They were in an administrative
capacity. But because after the war we wanted their expertise, we
brought over a thousand of these scientists and their families.
They were down in Huntsville, Alabama. I don't know if you've
ever been there. The Chamber of Commerce is *named* after Werhner
von Braun. It has big pictures of all these Nazis and their
families with their hands up, taking their oath of American
citizenship. And they're *proud* of the Nazis they brought in. I
guess to get 2 on the moon it's worth 30 million dead, huh?
One of them built the Saturn 5 rocket, and only just recently got
chased out of the country, much to the chagrin of Lyndon LaRouche
and his crew who are fighting to get him back in. That's Walter
Rudolph, who helped to get us to the moon. And without them,
these Nazis, we wouldn't have done it. Of course they say they
weren't "ardent" Nazis, whatever that means. {1}. They weren't
involved in the war crimes. But they *were* there, they *were* in
the position to do something, to speak out. And when asked they
say, "Well if I'd spoken out, I would have been in the camps with
the Jews myself. So what could I have done?"
And Dorhnberger was actually scheduled for indictment. The
British prosecutor, Shawcross, said that he ought to hang. He was
suspected of having worked, not only at Dora, but with the
"Butcher" at Auschwitz, at the Auschwitz concentration camp. And
instead, when Werhner von Braun got here to the United States, he
said that he wouldn't do any work on our rockets unless we saved
his mentor, his old friend, Walter Dorhnberger. So McCloy and
Lucius Clay intervened on his behalf and he was brought directly
to the United States. And first, he got a job in Huntsville, I
think at Mussel Shoals, with NASA for a little bit. And then he
got into a position that he kept for many, many years, where he
headed up the helicopter systems division at Bell Aircraft in the
Dallas/Houston area.
And it was in that position that he hired, during the 1950s and
'60s, a top-ranking military intelligence agent by the name of
Michael Paine. Michael Paine had a wife, Ruth Paine, and the two
of them were very tight with the White Russian Solidarist
community that lived in Dallas, many of these White Russians. And
I say the history of these Nazis dates back to the time of the
[Bolshevik] revolution. They're disaffected. Many of them worked
with the CIA and other spy agencies, and Paine's family had
connections with them. They went to a White Russian Orthodox
church there, in Dallas, that was built with monies from the
Cummins Catherwood Fund from Philadelphia. One of the blue-line
families out in Philadelphia, Cummins Catherwood also funded the
Cuban Aid Relief for the Bay of Pigs survivors, who were
intimately involved in the assassination. And it was at that
church that meetings happened, in the Christmas of the early
'60s, between the Paines and the Oswalds. And it was the Paines
that housed Marina Oswald, out in Irving, Texas. It was the
Paines, along with Marina, who were some of the few people to
testify to the idea that Oswald owned a rifle. It was Ruth Paine
that got Oswald the job at the Book Depository, in October, and
placed him, in part, as the patsy there. It was her friend, Roy
Truly, who lied to the police, and said that they had taken a
roll call and that Oswald was the only one missing from the
building at the time they came in to find the so-called assassin.
Even though everybody else looked in a different direction to
where the noise had come from, up on the Grassy Knoll, the police
ran to where they were supposed to, to the School Book
Depository.
So when you scratch the surface of how they set it up, who told
the lies, who engineered the "patsying" of Oswald, you find these
people with the connections to the International Fascists.
Werhner von Braun, knowing that the Russians, the Soviet troops,
were going to come into Berlin, packed up shop at Dora, where he
was building the rockets. He moved into Switzerland, leaving a
trail for U.S. Intelligence, that had contacted him and other
scientists months before in something called Operation Overcast.
When he got up into that area, General Thurston, who was in
charge of the military takeover for that sector, followed through
with the arrangements to have him and several other scientists
arrested and brought to the United States.
The person who actually effected the arrests, the physical
arrests, of Werhner von Braun and the rocket scientists, the
Paper Clip boys (they called it Project Paper Clip, to bring
these people in) was the aide-de-camp to Thurston, a fellow named
Clay Shaw.
Years later, Jim Garrison attempted to indict Clay Shaw for his
involvement in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. And Clay
Shaw, among other things, was on the board of directors of a firm
called Permindex, which had offices at that time out of Canada.
Where they were doing training, along with British Intelligence,
of assassins all during World War II. It was work that involved,
among other people, Ian Fleming. And in fact, Ian Fleming's
character, James Bond, is a real person that lives in
Philadelphia and is very close to the Cummins Catherwood family.
So whenever I began to look, I found these little nests of
snakes. They intertwine, you know, they lock together, and their
histories coincide. They send each other books and messages. They
know each other. They get each other jobs.
Another person with connections to the Nazis, who was very
instrumental in the assassination, is George DeMohrenschildt. He
came from a reactionary family in Russia. His father was a top
level employee of the Nobel oil family, which was like the
Rockefellers here, prior to the [Bolshevik] revolution. They lost
their fortune there. His brother, Von DeMohrenschildt, was jailed
by the revolution for a period. When they got loose, they went to
Germany. They helped the Fascists set up. Von went into the CIA-
funded Tolstoy Foundation, which was a center for the White
Russians during the whole period. And George DeMohrenschildt was
an oil engineer. Among other places that he worked, and was close
to, was Kerr-McGee (he was tight with Mr. Kerr), where Karen
Silkwood was later killed by the Industrial Security Command
guards. That Defense Industrial Security Command was running
Mussel Shoals and Huntsville, Alabama, when the Nazis arrived.
You see, it just goes over and over, back and forth. You can find
the connections if you start with the evidence. If you look to
see who are these people, who do they know, how are they funded?
And I saw it not only there, but throughout the other
assassinations. Who were the top lieutenants in Jonestown? All
were tied in with the Nazi money, with the International Fascism,
the training, or the movements of the Nazis themselves.
I wanted you to see this before I quit. This is a documentary
film made by a fellow named Bob Groden. He worked at *Life*
magazine, in the photo department, when this film came from
Dallas. This supposedly "homemade" film was made by a fellow
named Abraham Zapruder, who was a bystander that "happened" to be
standing near the Grassy Knoll filming the motorcade go by. And
he caught, on this little piece of film, supposedly just by
accident, the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Well the reason
I'm making all these secondary comments is that we found out when
Abraham Zapruder died that he's a White Russian. That he was from
that same section there in Minsk, where George DeMohrenschildt
and Marina's family came from. Marina's uncle was a high-ranking
military officer in the NKVD, but her family was White Russian
and anti-communist. And Gehlen infiltrated a lot of the KGB and
Soviet military and intelligence structures during the war, and
left agents in place. And you know, there's reason to believe
that a number of people that were involved with Oswald, even in
the Soviet Union, also tie to this International Fascism; *and
not* to the idea that Oswald was some kind of a KGB agent. He was
a *Naval Intelligence* operative. He had crypto clearance. He
travelled around with the U-2. And he was a U.S. spy. He was sent
to defect falsely to the Soviet Union.
(to be continued)
[Transcript of a talk given by John Judge at a one-day conference
entitled "The Fourth Reich in America." A transcript of the
entire conference, "The Fourth Reich in America," is available
from Flatland Books, P.O. Box 2420, Fort Bragg, CA 95437.]
--------------------------<< Notes >>----------------------------
{1} "...they weren't 'ardent' Nazis, whatever that means." In
other words, they were "just following orders."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


216
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-31.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 31
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ASSASSINATION AS A TOOL OF FASCISM
----------------------------------
(...continued...)
JOHN JUDGE: [...continues...] He [Oswald] got out of the Marines
(you try this) because a box fell on his mother's nose nine
months before. And the letter documenting her "nasopharyngitis"
(which means it was swollen) condition arrived 4 days *after* the
discharge. But the number from the discharge sheet appeared a
month *before*, on his passport out of the country, you see. So
he was set to go.
And he was sent by the military, because there were no civilian
flights when he went from Helsinki into the area. Nothing but a
military flight could have explained his passage.
Also, when he was ready to come home, he'd met Marina four times
in his life, and he married her the fourth time he met her. And
then he took her out of the country. But of course they could get
her to lie. Because she still didn't have her citizenship in '63,
they could have sent her right back.
And so what they had her do was say that she didn't speak
English, and she spoke Russian. And they brought in George Bouhe
and Raigorodsky and these other CIA translators. And in case the
translator didn't translate the Russian just right, all the
people stenotyping at that point, taking minutes, were on
maternity leave from the CIA.
And then, of course, all the lawyers asking the questions were
chosen in a meeting, the minutes of which are still buried in the
National Archives as "National Security" matter until 2039. But
I'm sure they weren't chosen just because they were under A's or
B's in the phone book.
It's like when James McCord, a 21 year top man, operative with
the CIA, gets caught at Watergate because he puts a second piece
of tape on the door (that's what he calls his book, *A Second
Piece of Tape*). Well, you know, if you go down and find that
somebody's removed the tape, you've got to cheese the operation
and get out of the building. He puts another piece of tape on,
and when Wills comes around on the second round, he *has* to
report it. So McCord's in there to make sure they get arrested.
His guy Baldwin, across the street, doesn't warn anybody. But
when McCord needs a lawyer for Watergate, he goes out and he gets
this guy Bernard Fensterwald, who heads up something called the
Committee to Investigate Assassinations. Which he uses the
mnemonic, the CTIA. I wrote him a letter and said, "You know, in
mnemonics, pronouns don't get a letter. It's really CIA, isn't it
Bud?"
And then it comes out in the Watergate hearing that McCord was
donating money to the CTIA. You know, he's a "conspiracy nut"
too, I guess. Or else *maybe* the CIA was paying Fensterwald to
find out what everybody knows. Sherman Skolnick challenged him,
in 1972, at a meeting. He said, "You know, when a CIA guy gets
sick, he goes to a CIA doctor. When he needs money, he goes to
the CIA bank. When he needs a lawyer, he goes to Edward Bennett
Williams, doesn't he?"
After that, Fensterwald was the lawyer for Paisley's wife, the
guy who drowned in the drink, in the Potomac, and was part of the
Nysenko briefing; a CIA agent. Although *they* say he committed
suicide, he put diving weights on (if this is true), shot himself
in the head, threw the gun overboard, and then leapt to his
death. Skolnick says he drowned, 'cause all the water rushed in
the hole in his head.
I was looking for an article this morning, about a suicide that
was actually reported in the press from Baltimore: Where a guy
committed suicide, get this, by hitting himself 38 times in the
head with a hammer. And the police were there, demonstrating to
the press how he might have done it. Thirty-eight times, what a
headache.
My best one came over the news about a year ago. They said the
police had determined suicide in a case where the body parts were
wrapped in a bag. And the bag was tied from the outside. I mean,
Houdini's got nothing on this guy.
So when you look at the pathology, which is what I do, and the
nuts and bolts; the bullets, and what direction do they go, and
where do they come from, and who shot them -- just the police
work -- that's all you have to do. That's all you have to get. I
mean, they hide it from you a little bit, but you can piece it
together. Then you know, that it *didn't* happen the way they
told you.
I mean, when you go into the evidence of the John F. Kennedy
assassination, you'll find that Oswald didn't own a rifle; he
didn't own a pistol. He didn't fire a gun that day. There were no
nitrate samples on the cheeks or on his palms. He didn't shoot a
gun. He didn't kill anybody.
Then you go to the witness testimony and the photographic
evidence. And you find out he wasn't on the sixth floor and
couldn't have gotten down the stairwell to the first or second
floor to be buying a coke, when the cop stuck a gun in his
stomach in the first round of interchange a few minutes after the
shooting. Seven people saw him watching the motorcade go by, on
the first floor, as Kennedy was being shot. And we have a photo,
James Altgen's photo, of him standing in the doorway. Of course,
the Warren Commission said it was somebody else. But all you have
to do is compare that guy's description of his shirt to the shirt
that Oswald has on there, and the one he's got on when he's
arrested. It's Oswald. You can tell. I'm not a photo expert, but
you can see his face, hairline, and everything else is the same.
He was what he said he was: a patsy.
And then, even if you say he's up there, and shooting with this
Mannlicher-Carcano, the bullets can't do the damage. And it's the
*same thing* every time I look at it.
The Robert Kennedy case is the same. I noticed that they even use
the same language when they testify. There's this phrase they
use. They say, "The bullet is consistent with having been fired
from the weapon." Now that's not a ballistic term. You know,
ballistics can tell you pretty much, as long as they've got the
bullet relatively intact, whether it came from that specific gun.
Because of the scratches on it, the rifling, and what type of
bullet it is. All that "consistent with having been fired from
the weapon" means is that the bullet is not too big to get
through the barrel. The caliber is either equal to, or smaller
than, the gun caliber of the barrel. It won't get stuck.
And the way I finally realized that that didn't mean anything was
in an affidavit in the Sacco and Vanzetti trial. Where the
sheriff testified "Yes" when they asked him was the bullet in the
guard at Braintree *consistent* with Sacco's gun. And he said
that it was. And then he filed an affidavit later, saying that he
didn't want to be misunderstood; that he was instructed by the
judge to answer just "yes" or "no" and that all he meant was that
the bullet would get through the barrel. But that same phrase is
in the Robert Kennedy trial transcript, it's in the Warren
Commission ballistic evidence.
Just to take one more example: When Reinhard Gehlen came here,
many of his 300 operatives were funnelled through a section of
the Defense Department known as the Army Historical Division.
Because they, especially George Patton, were busy hiring Nazis to
help them write the official history of World War II. {1}. So
both Nazi war criminals and Nazi *historians* were channeled in
through this, and then fed into the beginnings of the CIA, which
was formed by Gehlen and his organization. And into Radio Free
America {2} and Radio Free Europe. The engines of the National
Security State and the Cold War logic were a lie.
When the Warren Commission investigators had finished their work
and they went to write the Report, they didn't take any of the
attorneys or any of the people that they had, essentially,
already bought off to do a phoney investigation. They wanted to
make *sure* there was nothing in that Report that would go wrong.
And when I went into the Archives, about 300 cubic feet of the
minutes from the meetings were notes, voluminous notes, from
those 5 different staff investigative teams to the Warren
Commission, in relation to the final report which they had read.
And the notes say, "What's the basis for this conclusion? What's
the evidence for this?" Line after line. Even the liars couldn't
go as far as the author of the Warren Commission Report had gone.
But the report went out intact. Hale Boggs asked in one of the
meetings whether they should print any of the evidence.
"I guess you know," Boggs said, "It might look a little fishy if
we didn't."
"Go ahead and print it," Dulles said. "Nobody will read it
anyway."
And Boggs said, "A few of those people out there know how to
read."
I doubt he meant me, but here I am.
And when you do read it, you can find it out. But the person that
actually wrote the report is a fellow named *Otto Winnacker*. He
was on TDY, transfer from the Pentagon to the Warren Commission,
to do that job. He was also, historically, one of 26 official
historians of the Reich who worked directly under the
Reichschancellor, Adolph Hitler, and was brought here into the
United States.
(to be continued)
[Transcript of a talk given by John Judge at a one-day conference
entitled "The Fourth Reich in America." A transcript of the
entire conference, "The Fourth Reich in America," is available
from Flatland Books, P.O. Box 2420, Fort Bragg, CA 95437.]
--------------------------<< Notes >>----------------------------
{1} Proof that, indeed, "History is written by the assassins."
{2} Not to be confused with the radio show hosted by Tom
Valentine, nor with the radio show featuring Dave Emory.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


132
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-32.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 32
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[CN Editor -- I cannot vouch for the accuracy of *all* of the
following. It may or may not be true, I just don't know.]
[The following is a transcript of a recorded phone message put
out by a group in Chicago called "Citizens' Committee to Clean Up
the Courts [CCCC]." (312) 731-1100 and (312) 731-1505.]
Hi! Sherman Skolnick, Citizens' Committee to Clean Up the Courts,
9800 Oglesby.
The monopoly press do not like to discuss martial law, because
they do not trust the American people.
On June 3rd, 1994, Clinton, as President and commander-in-chief,
signed secret executive orders amending or superseding previous
national emergency powers. The new orders consolidate the set-up
of a police state.
The national security emergency orders were not intended to be
made public, invoking "national security" for secrecy. Someone,
however, swiped the documents and faxed them to independent
political activists.
By these emergency orders, Clinton gives to himself or his
successor powers as a Nazi-style dictator. The National Security
Council and the National Security Advisor control the Federal
Emergency Management Agency [FEMA] -- *all* to sit *above* the
U.S. Constitution. Yes, it is unconstitutional on its face. But
get this: The orders state that the courts have no power to
scrutinize these secret directives. (By the way, in Chicago, 3
FEMA officials also sit as federal judges -- plainly
unconstitutional.)
Clinton signed the same right during the super secret Bilderberg
group meeting, which in '94 was in Finland. Notice: There are at
least 3 secret societies meeting each year to control the lives
of the bulk of the common people -- the Trilateral Commission,
the Bilderberg group, and the Bohemian Grove group. Governments
are overthrown, wars and depression often follow in the wake of
such meetings.
For example, in August '74, right after the Bohemian Grove
meeting, President Nixon was "put to the wall." In 1973, our
chairman [CCCC], in speeches at colleges across the nation,
discussed what came out to be the secret agenda for replacing the
White House team. First, vice-President Spiro Agnew by a bribery
scandal, and Gerald Ford by appointment, not election -- the new
vice-President. And second, on the downfall of Nixon, Ford
stepped up to the Presidency. He, in turn, appointed Nelson
Rockefeller as the new vice-President. *All* without an election.
(By the way, Ford survived several genuine assassination attempts
in 1975. Rockefeller wanted to be President!)
In the Spring of '94, our chairman [CCCC] gave the details of a
$100 million scandal involving vice-President Al Gore -- the milk
bovine hormone and the Food and Drug Administration [FDA] --
incriminating Gore's wife [Tipper Gore], and relative Michael R.
Taylor, a top official of the FDA, and the FDA chief [Kessler].
Grafters include the giant Monsanto Chemical Company and 5 of
their former officials, now with FDA. Taylor has been Monsanto's
chief outside counsel.
The hormone speeds up milk production by cows, *but* causes
infections that have to be treated with antibiotics -- getting
into the food chain. {1}.
Monsanto has corrupted FDA and Gore, who as Senator promoted new
laws restricting FDA.
This group, called the "gang of four," {2} do not want milk to be
labelled hormone free.
The new secret agenda apparently is to use all of this to wreck
Gore. First, replacing him with Jay Rockefeller. Then, with the
Whitewater downfall of Clinton {3}, Rockefeller will be the new
President. *All* without an election.
The panic with the dollar trading is related to these rotten
efforts to suspend, or cancel, the U.S. Constitution -- all in
care of "Adolph" Clinton.
Call up your favorite news fakers and tell them to stop killing
these stories.
In Chicago, see us on cable tv, channel 21, 9 pm [cst] most
Monday evenings.
Play it again: The Murder of Reporters. (312) 731-1505.
New message Saturday; we change it several times a week.
Donations appreciated. Citizen's Committee to Clean Up the
Courts, 9800 South Oglesby, Chicago, [Illinois] 60617. For the
latest on courts, banks, espionage agencies, political
assassinations, and the news media. On 24 hours a day.
------------------------<< Notes >>------------------------------
{1} The way I understand this is (a) due to bovine hormone, the
cows produce more milk, (b) this increased lactation exhausts the
cows, leaving them more susceptible to infection, this leads to
(c) the cows are given antibiotics to fight the infections, *but*
these antibiotics are then increasingly present in the milk we
drink.
{2} The Gang of Four: FDA chief Kessler, Tipper Gore, Tipper
Gore's cousin, Michael R. Taylor, and Al Gore.
{3} "...the Whitewater downfall of Clinton." It occurs to me that
the recent excesses following the death of Nixon (e.g. flags
flown at half staff for *30 days*, etc.) may have been
orchestrated to give us the message "don't be so hard on Clinton
as we were on Nixon."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


197
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-33.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 33
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ASSASSINATION AS A TOOL OF FASCISM
----------------------------------
(...continued...)
JOHN JUDGE: [...continues...] When Gehlen finished setting up the
CIA here, he went back to Germany and helped set up the postwar
German, NATO, and French Intelligence structures that rule the
reactionary politics in those countries and in Europe today, and
that command our constant military presence there. Forty years
after the war's supposed to be over.
He was replaced in large part, at that point, by Otto von
Bolshwing. Otto Albrecht von Bolshwing, who had been Adolph
Eichmann's superior at the Hebrew desk for the movement of the
Jews and the Final Solution and the killing and the planning. But
he was never tried in Nazi Germany. He was just allowed to slip
through the cracks, like many of them, and ended up here, in the
United States. He helped form a corporation called TCI, with
Edwin Wilson, Helena von Damm, and with other people connected to
the intelligence agencies, as one of many front companies out
here in California. When it went bankrupt, it sold its largest
subsidiary to Albert Hakim and Richard Secord. And that
subsidiary became Stanford Technology Trading Group, and Trading
Group International. These were their fronts, during that time.
And the financing, if you remember, of [Oliver] North's
operation, was through Credit Suisse. Well Credit Suisse was set
up as a bank, in the 1940s, as the funnel and conduit for
Permindex. It was the banking firm to take care of Permindex's
international operations.
And just recently, when I was reading *Tennessee Waltz* by James
Earl Ray {1}, where he names the person in Canada that introduced
him to the mysterious character Raoul {2}, who set him up as the
patsy. He says that that's a person named David Gravier. Well
David Gravier is an international financier, connected to
American Banking and Trust, which itself is a major subsidiary of
guess who? Credit Suisse. Where did he [Ray] meet him [Raoul]? In
Canada, where Permindex was located. See, so you'll find the
connections going back to certain firms, certain cover.
The current world cover for the training of these assassins, I
believe, is an evangelical right-wing organization known as World
Vision. Among its employees at the Fort Chaffee Refugee Camp it
was running for Laotian, Thai, and Vietnamese refugees was a
young man named Mark David Chapman -- responsible for the death
of a very political musician who could have brought a million
people out in response to Reagan's war efforts in a single day,
named John Lennon.
Mark David Chapman had military training. He was in Beirut,
interestingly enough, when military training was going on there
by Wilson and Terpil. And he moved to Hawaii, worked for the
large military firms. You'll remember he took a military stance
at the time. The chairman of the board in those days of World
Vision was none other than John Hinckley, Sr. The funding for
World Vision was, primarily, during the Vietnam period, CIA
directly funding it. They now still admit 5% coming through
USAID, which was the cover. And they operated in all of Southeast
Asia, collecting information on Laotians, Cambodians and others
under the cover of this missionary work. They were in charge of
the refugee camps at Sabra and Shatilla when the Fascist Phalange
came in and killed the Palestinians. They are in charge of the
refugee camps, along the Honduran border, for the Central
Americans, where the Contras are allowed to go in and actively
recruit. They run the physical operation in the camps for the
Cuban and Haitian refugees here in the United States. And it was
at those camps, you remember, there were riots. Well part of what
started that riots was that they brought into those camps a
political education program that if you didn't attend, you didn't
eat. And the people that ran that program for the Cubans were
none other than Alpha-66 and Omega-7, the Cuban reactionaries
left over from the Bay of Pigs invasion.
And, these international refugee communities they started in the
'50s (I went back to their earliest populations) were really just
attempts to manipulate people that were in Communist countries
who were reactionary and were running from the situations or the
changes in those countries. Refugee populations are expendable;
they're manipulable. Part of the history of Jonestown is the
history of refugees, 'cause a lot of the reason they went to
Matthew's Ridge is that they wanted cheap labor there.
But I found the same names cropping up, the same *modus
operandi*, the same monies, (and I've only named a few of them),
throughout not only the major assassinations (the Kennedys,
Martin Luther King, the Chappaquidik incident, where Ted Kennedy
was set up and Mary Jo [Kopechne(?)] was killed, the murder of
Jessica Savitch, a number of these situations I've worked on),
but also many of the witnesses that died (75 strange witness
deaths in John Kennedy case, 80 each, or around that, each, in
both Martin Luther King and the Robert Kennedy, another 35-40
strange deaths connected with Watergate, the Second House Select
Committee on Assassinations) {3}. And a lot of the people that we
knew were involved in the original research started to drop dead.
There's people dropping dead now, during the Contragate
investigation. It's a constant pattern: the witnesses are wiped
out.
And when you go into the specifics: who did they know, or where
they were, who was around them, or who helped set them up, you
will find, I believe, (if you do the work, and I encourage you to
do it on the things that you're interested in) people that have
connections to *Navy Intelligence*. That's the central place
where these people operated from, on the command level. You'll
find people otherwise involved in the U.S. Intelligence agencies.
And you'll find people either with direct ties to Nazi Germany or
with connections to *current* Fascist International networks that
grew out of that period.
But those Nazis came here. They formed our foreign policy.
There's a couple of new books out. If you haven't had a chance to
see them, you should get them. This is by Bower, from a British
publisher. It's called *The Paperclip Conspiracy*, and it's about
the hunt for the Nazi scientists. There's an earlier book by
Clarance Lasby, *Project Paperclip* that's very good, but these
are recent ones, with some new information.
And this very good book by Chris Simpson. All these still miss
pieces, or perspective, but this is called *Blowback*, which is
an Intelligence term for negative effects from a covert
operation; America's recruitment of Nazis and its effects on the
Cold War.
All these things are available. It's not impossible to get this
information. I think you need to focus a little bit.
What I'm suggesting is that there's this history of the Fascism
moving; that assassination has been its long-term technique for
certain political purposes; and that it's time you took a look
around you. Because they are killing us. They're not killing all
of us. But they're killing people not just at the top government
levels, but all the way down to the activists and the people who
are going to try to make a difference.
Which is *not* to me, again, an argument not to try to make a
difference. Because they can't kill us all. Or if we don't do
anything, they *will* kill us all. So you see, it's one or the
other. But to me, there's really no choice.
If you stumble across Auschwitz in the 1940s, you're either going
to go home, and be a "good German" and use the soap, or you're
going to speak up. You see, you're going to speak up and you're
going to have the horrible fate that Walter Rudolph didn't want.
You're going to become one of the excess population; one of the
*untermenschen*, one of the expendables.
But I'd suggest that, given the reality of the economy, that most
of you here in the audience are that already. My obeisance to the
FBI and CIA agents here; you probably have a good paycheck still.
But I would think that most of you are not in such a secure
position. And this economy is not so long for the world, in terms
of taking care of everybody. If you haven't looked around you on
the street lately, there's a depression out there, and that's
what a depression looks like.
(to be continued)
[Transcript of a talk given by John Judge at a one-day conference
entitled "The Fourth Reich in America." A transcript of the
entire conference, "The Fourth Reich in America," is available
from Flatland Books, P.O. Box 2420, Fort Bragg, CA 95437.]
--------------------------<< Notes >>----------------------------
{1} James Earl Ray was found guilty of the assassination of
Martin Luther King, jr. There are many who doubt that Ray was, in
fact, the assassin.
{2} James Earl Ray claimed to have received instructions for many
of his actions from a shadowy figure known only to him as
"Raoul."
{3} Also worth noting at this juncture, the Clinton Body Count;
i.e., "suicides" and violent deaths of persons connected to Bill
Clinton.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


153
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-34.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 34
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ASSASSINATION AS A TOOL OF FASCISM
----------------------------------
(...continued...)
JOHN JUDGE: [...continues...] It's interesting too that a lot of
those homeless people are Vietnam veterans. About 70% of the
homeless on the East coast, in fact, are veterans. Which is an
aspect that's been ignored, besides the suicides, tremendous
unemployment rates and long-term problems, because these wars
*are* genocidal wars. They have a little different technology,
they drop the oven out of the air instead of picking the body up
and putting it in the oven, but it's still genocide.
If the little countries of the world, where we are pushing
ourselves around, could get into a court and tell what we've been
doing there, it would not look so different from the Nuremberg
trials; in fact, I suggest to you that it's worse.
My friends say to me, "If it's Nazi Germany, who are the Jews?"
{1}. Well the Jews are the Central Americans. Some of the *Jews*
are still the Jews if they don't have enough money and prestige
and aren't being used for the current time in the reactionary
processes. Women. {2}. The disenfranchised. The first people that
Lori [a previous speaker] mentioned that were killed: the
psychiatric inmates are certainly an expendable population. The
institutionalized people: the elderly, children in institutions,
prisoners, and people in the military. The veterans are guinea
pigs; after they get out of all that military stuff they're just
used by the system further.
So there are people dying every day. And if you don't add up the
deaths, you don't get the right total, you don't get the sense of
what's happening.
And then they say to me, "Yeah, but we don't live in terror. We
live good." Well if you were a good German and you went along
with the program and you looked the other way when they came and
got the neighbors {3}, you lived good too. They were looting the
whole world like we are. We're 6 percent of the population,
consuming 60 percent of its energy, 30 percent of its raw
materials coming right here, into this society. All this wealth
doesn't come from out of some magic well in Kansas marked
"Capitalism." It comes from tentacles of exploitation of labor
and resources all over the world. And because we exploit those
societies, they're in worse shape and we're in better shape.
There's enough to go around. There's no shortage. There's
surplus, in fact, if it weren't being used for war; and weren't
being diverted into cash crops instead of growing food, everyone
could eat, everyone could live comfortably. In fact, probably on
a third of the budget they spend on warfare in the world. There
is a surplus; the surplus has to be manipulated in order to
*disappear*.
But there are populations, Rand Corporation studied them. In '68
they did a study saying that half of the world population, over
two billion people, *had to go*, in order to make it economically
*comfortable* for the elites. They studied setting up martial law
in many countries where it came to pass: the Philippines, Yemen
and South Korea, Vietnam, Canada even, and eventually the United
States.
How do you set up martial law here? You do it with a terrorist
scenario. {4}. I'd suggest a *nuclear* terrorist scenario. You
have Abu Nidal, who's really Oliver North in drag. They say *I'm*
paranoid. I don't have an eight foot security fence around *my*
house. And he's working internationally with the people that
financed Nidal. It's not *mano a mano* it's *have him over for
dinner*. That fence is up for us, in case we figure out who Ollie
North really is and what he did to us.
You have this so-called "terrorist," you know, the guy with the
pop gun that terrorizes you. The nuclear weapons don't terrorize
you, the state control doesn't terrorize you, the massive death
and genocide that goes on in your name doesn't terrorize you. You
don't know who the enemy is, and so you're afraid of a guy on an
airplane with a pistol. But that's a terrorist, and you're
shaking in your boots, and now *they* are going to be said to
have a nuclear weapon. So, "Oh well, what can we do? We have to
suspend civil liberties. We have to put people in camps. We have
to do *whatever* is necessary in order to stop this 'threat'."
So you come up with a scenario that's good enough, and then you
move. And they have the plans, they know how to move, they have
it down to the neighborhood level. *If you buy the lie*; if you
don't identify who's oppressing whom and who the enemy really is.
Believe me, you are *not* in danger of Abu Nidal, or the PLO, or
whoever the Terrorist of the Month is supposed to be. Your life
is not hanging on a hinge. Yeah, maybe if you travel
internationally all the time you'll be on the wrong plane at the
wrong moment. But I doubt most of you are jet setters.
The threat comes from someplace else. And even the people who
take over the plane, in my experience, have ties to these same
military intelligence networks.
But they *kill* people. And at the same time it *is* possible to
expose how they do it; and to break the cycle of the lies; and to
catch up with it; and to understand who's assassinating whom, and
how. Because the techniques work and they use them over. They're
not that hard to figure out, once you understand the personnel
and the pattern.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
[Transcript of a talk given by John Judge at a one-day conference
entitled "The Fourth Reich in America." A transcript of the
entire conference, "The Fourth Reich in America," is available
from Flatland Books, P.O. Box 2420, Fort Bragg, CA 95437.]
--------------------------<< Notes >>----------------------------
{1} "If it's Nazi Germany, who are the Jews?" One obvious answer
that Judge omits would have to be the blacks. This is backed up
by statistics such as blacks on death row, black unemployment,
blacks in prison. Note that I am not saying that we should
therefore implement quotas or whatever. I don't know what the
solution is to America's traditional scapegoating of blacks.
{2} "If it's Nazi Germany, who are the Jews? .... Women." Yes and
no. The other side of the coin would be the FemiNazis. Who are
the FemiNazis? According to Texe Marrs, "They are unlike anything
the world has ever experienced. They're ruthless, shrewd and
calculating -- and they've got a stranglehold on the White
House.... [The FemiNazis,] the coven of brutally correct women
who now rule over us."
{3} "...when they came and got the neighbors." Like in Waco, for
instance.
{4} "How do you set up martial law here?" Another scenario would
be the collapse of the dollar, stocks plunge, economic disaster,
and here comes FEMA and the U.N. "peacekeepers."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


252
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-35.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 35
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"INDEPENDENT" COUNSEL FISKE (FIX?) REPORTS ON FOSTER DEATH
Former FBI agent and Watergate personage G. Gordon Liddy has a
talk show called "Radio Free D.C." Due to his contact with
someone claiming to be the first to have found the corpse of
White House aide Vincent Foster, Liddy has a marked interest in
trying to uncover all details relating to Foster's mysterious
death.
On Thursday, June 30, 1994, "independent" investigator into
Clinton sliminess, Robert Fiske (possibly in conjunction with the
FBI), released a report giving his conclusions as to
circumstances surrounding Foster's death. Fiske and the FBI,
either separately or together, concluded that Foster did commit
suicide in Fort Marcy park, where his body was found. (It is not
clear to me whether Fiske worked with the FBI on the report or
whether each arrived at the same conclusion separately.)
Due to his past association with the FBI, Liddy immediately
received a copy or copies of the report(s) when they first were
made public on June 30th. However he refrained from commenting on
the report until he had had time to read through it.
On his July 1, 1994 radio show, Liddy gave the following review
of the report. (Note that in what follows, it is sometimes hard
to distinguish between when Liddy is reading from the report and
when he is interjecting his own comments.)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
LIDDY: ...with respect to the independent counsel's conclusion
that Foster killed himself at Fort Marcy park.
The evidence that supports this conclusion is that the blood in
Foster's body remained pooled in his legs and body cavity; there
was very little of it having departed from the small entry wound
in his mouth and the large exit wound in the back of his head.
Foster's body lay on a rampart, at a 45-degree angle, with his
head and the wound significantly above the pooled blood.
The independent counsel determined that it would be very unlikely
for the body to be moved while maintaining that upright
positioning.
And of course that, that's talking about, you know, moving it
*there*. I'm, what I'm concerned about is, was, did he die
elsewhere and was moved *to* there.
He [Fiske] says when the Park Police did eventually move the
body, massive bleeding *did* ensue.
And the only soil found on Foster's clothing matched that of Fort
Marcy park. If he'd killed himself somewhere else, and his body
was moved by friends, there would likely to be large quantities
of soil or carpet fibers from the other location and his clothes
would have been disrupted, twisted. And none of this was found.
Well, the report may very well be correct. But the failure to
locate the bullet after a massive search is not satisfactorily
explained. Nor is the failure to find *any* skull fragments.
*None* were found there, ladies and gentlemen. And there was a
tremendous exit wound. And they found, I think, 12 other bullets.
But they didn't find the one that killed Foster! You know, one
wonders how many other people died there and they weren't
supposed to. I'm not convinced, necessarily, that Foster died
there.
And the skull fragments: they didn't find *any*.
All right. The FBI report also states that the travel office
fiasco played a heavy role in Foster's decision to commit
suicide. (Now mind you, I'm not saying that he didn't commit
suicide. I am questioning whether or not he died *there*.) Foster
was concerned that the White House travel office firings would be
closely investigated and he was depressed because he felt such an
investigation was unwarranted. (This is all, what I'm reading you
now, is from the report.) Foster felt that he should resign. But
his reputation would be destroyed if he admitted the fiasco was
his responsibility and be unable to show his face back in Little
Rock.
Foster consulted an attorney as to [unclear] his own exposure
concerning "Travelgate" and feared that his efforts at protecting
himself would conflict with his duties to serve the interests of
the President.
According to the report, Vincent Foster was a quiet and reserved
man who never raised his voice. Yet he raised his voice to then-
White House counsel Nussbaum when it was decided that Kennedy
would be the highest White House official reprimanded in the wake
of the travel office firings.
Foster, according to the FBI report, wanted to take the blame for
himself. This is consistent with reports that Foster was a man of
loyalty who worked very hard to build and maintain his
reputation. It's likely that tremendous stress was placed on him
when the travel office staff was fired and their names were
smeared by White House statements that the FBI was investigating
them internally. Once it became public that the FBI was
investigating nothing, until they were called by the same White
House employees who made the slanderous statements, Foster
speculated that there would be Congressional investigation. (And
of course, there should have been.) Foster was, most likely,
unwilling to obstruct that investigation by hiding the plans to
put President Clinton's cousin in charge of the travel. Foster
knew of the connections between her travel agency experience in
Little Rock, and [Dan] Lasater.
(Lasater is the fellow who is the convicted cocaine dealer. And a
high official in Lasater's organization is now a high official on
the White House staff [Patsy Thomasson(?)].)
The plan to assist Hollywood "Friend Of Bill" Thomasson generate
massive profits for his charter airline, Ultra Air, in return for
the large campaign contribution [a.k.a. bribe] was something that
Foster knew. And Foster knew that the real way to get in trouble
in Washington is to participate in a cover-up. He retained a
lawyer. He knew that appropriate actions to protect himself would
be in conflict with his actions to protect the President and
Hillary. And he wanted to resign, but he felt trapped. Because to
resign in the wake of the fiasco would have damaged his
reputation in Little Rock. But he was not going to remain in the
White House and participate in the cover-up. If the Clinton White
House was going to play the cover-up game, they were gonna do it
without Vince Foster.
So he "ate" his gun.
All right. Now. There is some more here. In an attempt to deal
with his depression, according to... this is according to the FBI
report, Foster wrote down "everything that was disturbing him,"
mentioning that he'd made mistakes relating to "Travelgate"
because of ignorance and overwork. And he wrote that he did not
knowingly violate any law. He felt that members of the White
House press corps improperly benefited from wrongdoing at the
travel office, but covered the story in a limited fashion so as
to prevent exposure of their own complicity and benefit from
wrongful action.
Well the FBI was unable to determine Foster's whereabouts between
1 pm, when he left the White House, and the time he arrived at
Fort Marcy and where and when he got the gun. It was not in the
White House and it is doubtful that he had previously put it in
his car. Was his car in the White House parking lot? There were
rumors that it was not. If not, perhaps the gun was in the car
and he purposely left it outside the White House gate. That's
just speculation.
Foster's clothes were neat; there was no sign of a struggle.
Uh, insufficient evidence available to estimate the time of
death!? That's rather remarkable, isn't it? I mean, you know,
that the, uh, estimating the time of death is something that is
routinely done in autopsies. I don't really understand that.
Now. The .38 caliber Colt revolver had one empty shell casing in
it and one complete cartridge. The gun had *two* serial numbers;
that indicates it was a composite. Both of the originals were
sold in 1913. There's no additional information. Foster's sister
*thought* it was her fathers. There's no additional .38 caliber
ammunition that was found in the Foster home or the automobile.
You know, there's just 2 cartridges, one of which was expended.
The bullet which exited the back of Foster's skull was never
found! Now look: nobody buys two Remington cartridges! Where are
the rest of the .38 cartridges?! They most likely are in the same
place that Foster was between 1 pm and 4 pm. And where was that?
Somebody in this town knows. Maybe the person whose hair was
found on Foster's clothes.
Well the report goes on to say that the confidential witness
reported seeing wine cooler bottles, a 4-pack. The report states
that there were empty beer bottles left by Foster's sons from a
recent trip to the beach. Oh? No alcohol is found in the body,
but trace amounts of [unclear] and valium, missed by the county
but found by the FBI lab. (Well that's to be expected. The FBI
lab is the best in the world.)
No X-rays were taken at the autopsy... *the machine was broken*!!
<groans>
Listen to this: In addition to numerous gunpowder particles found
on and around Foster which match that from the Remington
cartridges found in the gun, there were small amounts of
gunpowder residue which did *not* come from Foster's gun. And the
report can't determine the origin of that foreign gunpowder. But
is speculates that the clothes removed from Foster's body were
contaminated in an evidence room at the Park Police station where
the clothes were left in the open for 4 days in a room with a
fan. You see now? Uh, why the FBI should have been the
investigating agency here, ladies and gentlemen, and not the
"meter maids"?
Valium was found... of course the White House did not want the
FBI investigating this death. *No way*. Valium was found in
Foster's home. But his wife was not aware that he was taking it.
There was no blood found on the gun?? *That's* interesting.
Blood stains inconsistent with the position of the body as
discovered. (And at the very least, Foster's head was moved.)
That you'll find in page 45.
One fingerprint was found on the gun. It was not that of Vincent
Foster.
Hair, other than Foster's, was found on the body. Fibers from a
carpet were found on the body. Perhaps a lover. Or a killer.
Perhaps the body was taken from a carpet. Perhaps the clothing
was placed on a carpet prior to killing... even days before. We
don't know.
An extensive search was conducted for the bullet. Metal detectors
were used. 12 bullets were found. All were modern and none
matched Foster's gun.
No bone fragments were found. I don't know, the FBI reports that
Foster killed himself where he was found, basing their conclusion
on the little blood found on the body. When a body's moved
there's considerable bleeding and staining as well as massive
contamination of the clothing.
Soil different. Now that's assuming that, you know, that he died
on different soil and not on a carpet someplace.
I don't know, ladies and gentlemen. There's a *lot* of questions
that I still would like to see resolved about *where* Vincent
Foster met his death.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


164
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-36.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 36
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[From an interview with the former marketing director of the
Arkansas Development and Finance Authority, and former associate
of Bill Clinton, Larry Nichols. This interview took place on the
May 5, 1994 "America's Town Forum" radio show, hosted by Tom
Donahue. The show is broadcast most weekday evenings at 7 pm
(cst) on shortwave frequency 5.810 mHz. (Nichols speaks via
telephone with Donahue.)]
TOM DONAHUE: I want to tell our listeners about a special guest
we have today; as a matter of fact, *return* guest: Larry
Nichols. Larry Nichols appears in the video *Clinton's Circle of
Power*, and a soon-to-be-released video, *The Clinton
Chronicles*.
Larry, thanks so much for joining us back, on "America's Town
Forum."
LARRY NICHOLS: Yes, good mornin'. I can barely hear ya.
DONAHUE: O.K. Bob, you're gonna have to give him some more input;
some more volume.
Larry, can you hear us now?
NICHOLS: Uh... barely.
DONAHUE: O.K. We've made...
NICHOLS: Now! Now.
DONAHUE: Good. Good.
NICHOLS: You're there.
DONAHUE: All right, wonderful.
How are you feeling these days? Rumor had it that you were, uh,
food poisoned.
NICHOLS: Um... Well, of course, my demise was greatly
exaggerated.
DONAHUE: All right.
NICHOLS: I had... um, it is an interesting thing that happened. I
developed a rash, much like you would get from, like, touching
something you were allergic to. Except it manifested in my lungs.
And I come to find out it is somethin' from a pesticide. Of
course, I had nothing to do with pesticides. I don't know where I
got it, but everybody sort of put 2 and 2 together since Welch,
the investigator at Mena, was being poisoned and had similar
symptoms, people started assuming that I had been poisoned. Uh, I
find that *probably* not to be true. Um, you know, I don't think
that's true.
DONAHUE: Was this gentleman, Mr. Welch, was *he* poisoned?
NICHOLS: Yessir.
DONAHUE: He was. And for what reason and by whom?
NICHOLS: He was investigating Mena back in the early '80s. And he
was the main investigator and people in Mena play rough. And they
did not want him to continue on with his investigation. So, I
mean, I don't know exactly who poisoned him. I have to be careful
what I say so that I can justify, legally, everything I say. So,
I mean, I can only tell you...
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
[Here's what Welch himself says. The following is an
excerpt from a television show called "The Conspiracy
Tapes." My thanks to one of the readers of "Conspiracy
Nation" for sending me a videotape of this show.]
NARRATOR: Arkansas state police officer Russell Welch
tried to find out who knew what. It nearly got him
fatally poisoned.
WELCH: I was sick. I was originally diagnosed as
poisoned.
NARRATOR: And what was the poison that almost cost him
his life?
WELCH: Military biological agent: anthrax.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
DONAHUE: Right. How long ago was that? When did that occur?
NICHOLS: Uh that would have been probably, uh, '85.
DONAHUE: O.K. So it did happen back then. So that's not a recent
occurrence.
O.K. Let me, for our listeners who've never heard you or missed
the program when you were on with us, um, let's talk about your
association with Bill Clinton back in the '80s. What is the
connection. And I understand: the Arkansas Development and
Finance Authority. But you knew him prior to that as well.
NICHOLS: Yessir. I've known Bill Clinton since probably the mid-
80s to late-80s. As a matter of fact, I do spot marketing
projects for he and Hillary during the early '80s. As a matter of
fact, I helped package their educational standards package. And
it was only in 1988 that they *created* the job of marketing
director -- it was not there before me and it's not there now --
um, for me to come into that agency. I thought, ostensibly, I was
coming in to do what a marketing person does, which is market the
agency. What I found out was I was there simply as "damage
control" and to "put out fires."
DONAHUE: Hmm... Let's, let's talk...
NICHOLS: ...umm...
DONAHUE: O.K. I'm sorry. Go ahead.
NICHOLS: So anyway, I mean, that's the extent of my involvement
there.
DONAHUE: O.K.
NICHOLS: I mean, it gets a lot worse. But that's how I ended up
*at* the agency. And then while I was *at* the agency is when I
discovered the wrongs that were going on there. And then that
caused my problem, because I started to blow the whistle.
DONAHUE: How long did it take before you blew the whistle? And
tell us about the lawsuit.
NICHOLS: Well the whistle was blown... Excuse me one second. Hold
on. [Leaves the phone]
DONAHUE: O.K. We're talking... Let's do a break now, Bob. Quickly
go to a break. We'll come back with our guest and we'll take
calls soon. 1-800-298-8255.
(to be continued)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


109
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-37.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 37
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[CN Editor -- I cannot vouch for the accuracy of *all* of the
following. It may or may not be true, I just don't know.]
[The following is a transcript of a recorded phone message put
out by a group in Chicago called "Citizens' Committee to Clean Up
the Courts [CCCC]." (312) 731-1100 and (312) 731-1505.]
Hi! Sherman Skolnick, Citizens' Committee to Clean Up the Courts,
9800 Oglesby.
Some think judges and reporters, because they are high profile,
are generally not murdered because of their work.
Well, as we showed, it is not true for judges. *And*, it is not
true for reporters.
In July 1970, Ken Smart(?) [Sparks(?)], a reporter for WMAQ-TV,
channel 5, Chicago, was murdered -- covered up as a drowning. He
was working on a story about FBI complicity in the assassination
of Dr. King.
Investigating for a similar story was black journalist Louie
Lomax. And *he* was slaughtered a few weeks later.
In 1976, Don Bowles died after his car was bombed. He was a
reporter for a major Arizona newspaper owned by the Pulliams(?),
the family of former vice-President Quayle's mother. Bowles was
looking into a mobster-sports racketeer outfit called Emprise(?),
doing business in Arizona, Chicago, New York, and elsewhere.
Bowles discovered his own boss, the Pulliams, were reportedly in
business with the gangsters!
In 1977, Larry Buckman died in an Arab chartered plane crash in
the Mideast. The mass media "played down" that a bomb was
suspected. Formerly with channel 7 in Chicago, Buckman was
working for ABC News. He discovered that ABC's Barbara Walter's
circle were reportedly in the gun smuggling rackets in the
Mideast! Also, that Israeli Intelligence, the Mossad, had
penetrated and was manipulating the PLO.
Also, Buckman was only one of three journalists that had rather
direct knowledge that Jessie Jackson bribed the Nixon White House
to escape being prosecuted for extortion -- *but*, in the name of
human rights. (Jessie was also an unregistered foreign lobbyist
and Arab oil broker.)
Not long thereafter, a crack investigative reporter, Bill
Clemens(?) of Chicago, was found mysteriously dead. The
circumstances sure smelled of murder. Clemens was a reporter for
the old *Chicago Daily News* and the *Sun-Times*. He once
confided in another journalist that he had inside data for a
Chicago federal grand jury. They were set to indict Archbishop
Cody for embezzling $1 million of Catholic Church funds and
Vatican funds for Cody's mistress. A federal criminal indictment
was suppressed by the chief federal prosecutor here and the
crooked federal judges.
Chicago's channel 5 reporter Paul Hogan was deep into several
possible blockbuster stories. As a result of the Douallaby(?)
case, he found out there are rings of devil worshippers who
sacrifice children as part of their rituals. {1}. High level
public office holders, in Chicago and elsewhere, were Satanists
-- including a judge in the divorce court.
Also, Hogan found out that Jim Dvorak was reportedly a key "bag
man" to corruption of federal judges in Chicago. Close to former
federal prosecutor and Governor, Jim Thompson, Dvorak had been a
bankruptcy trustee.
Some of Hogan's pals believe that the reporter was murdered the
end of January, '93, in the hospital. *And*, not just any
hospital but Northwestern Memorial -- same one that covered up
the mysterious death of Halas, jr., the Chicago Bears owner,
*and* the same hospital that covered up the poison murder of
Chicago's first black mayor, Harold Washington.
(312) 731-1100 is our main message. Donations appreciated.
Citizen's Committee to Clean Up the Courts, 9800 South Oglesby,
Chicago, [Illinois] 60617. For the latest on courts, banks,
espionage agencies, political assassinations, and the news media.
On 24 hours a day.
------------------------<< Notes >>------------------------------
{1} "...devil worshippers" etc. Not so far-fetched as it might
seem. See, for example, *The Franklin Cover-Up* by John W.
DeCamp. Available ($12 including postage and handling) from AWT,
Inc., P.O. Box 85461, Lincoln, NE, 68501.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


110
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-38.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 38
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[CN Editor -- I cannot vouch for the accuracy of *all* of the
following. It may or may not be true, I just don't know.]
[The following is a transcript of a recorded phone message put
out by a group in Chicago called "Citizens' Committee to Clean Up
the Courts [CCCC]." (312) 731-1100 and (312) 731-1505.]
Hi! Sherman Skolnick, Citizens' Committee to Clean Up the Courts,
9800 Oglesby.
One who helps corrupt public officials is called a "bag man,"
"fixer," or simply, "the connection." In this role some years ago
was Murray "The Camel" Humphreys, a financial expert good at
arranging offshore bribes to state and federal judges in Chicago,
state and federal prosecutors here, and law enforcement. In 1965,
he was subpoenaed before a federal grand jury here. The FBI was
not concerned about his possible testimony against *state* court
officials, *but* were worried "The Camel" would "finger" high
level *federal* judges and *federal* prosecutors. So, the FBI
murdered "The Camel" and spread stories that he died of "natural
causes."
A team of Chicago lawyers acted as "bag men" in the 1960s and
thereafter: Oscar Noodleman and Harry G. [unclear]. In the first
such civil case of its kind, our chairman [CCCC] brought suit
against them. The crooked judges, naturally, rejected the case.
Noodleman's relatives were among the founders of the Chicago-
Tokyo Bank -- not really an Oriental bank at all. A former
Israeli Intelligence officer, [unclear], in his book, *Profits of
War*, says the Chicago-Tokyo Bank "washed" millions of dollars of
illicit gun-running loot, implicating Ollie North, George Bush,
and others -- part of the secret U.S.-Israeli arms network, the
author says.
Another reputed "bag man" has been Jenner & Block law partner,
Thomas P. Sullivan. He went on to whitewash corruption as the
chief federal prosecutor in Chicago. Sullivan was the reputed
graft carrier for the Community Currency Exchange Association to
bribe state legislators to kill any branch bank laws, hated by
his patrons.
Jenner & Block also reportedly has a unit specializing in bribing
and blackmailing judges in the municipal section of the circuit
court of Cook county {1} and the U.S. bankruptcy court.
Being "on the pad" is a term meaning a public official is on a
secret list and gets periodic bribes. Reportedly "on the pad"
with Jenner is chief bankruptcy judge John D. Schwartz as well as
judges Robert E. Ginsburg and Eugene [unclear], who's also a
general partner.
A bribe courier was Chicago bankruptcy auctioneer, Wallace
Lieberman. He was facing a possible special federal grand jury
subpoena. Like with "The Camel," an FBI agent murdered Lieberman.
A businessman, Michael Scott Dugan, got falsely pushed into the
bankruptcy court here. He claims it was part of a scheme to steal
$2 million of his family's properties. In a federal district
court case, #93C683, Dugan charges that an agent showed up at
Dugan's place of business, a shadowy character named Norman
Wolfe(?). The suit charges Wolfe discussed with Dugan corrupt
influence involved in Dugan's bankruptcy litigation *and* Wolfe
told Dugan, "Your representatives aren't gonna be able to help
you. *I* can arrange a meeting between you and Victor
Caciatori(?), a trustee of DePaul University, a talented lawyer,"
which Dugan understood to mean that Caciatori, with Wolfe, would
lend Dugan their ability to corrupt judges and other state and
federal officials.
Earlier, Caciatori had somehow escaped jail for his participation
in bribing Cook County Board of Tax Appeals employees to
corruptly obtain lower real estate tax assessments.
In Chicago, see us on cable tv, channel 21, 9 pm [cst] most
Monday evenings.
Play it again: The Murder of Reporters. (312) 731-1505.
New message Tuesday; we change it several times a week.
Donations appreciated. Citizen's Committee to Clean Up the
Courts, 9800 South Oglesby, Chicago, [Illinois] 60617. For the
latest on courts, banks, espionage agencies, political
assassinations, and the news media. On 24 hours a day.
------------------------<< Notes >>------------------------------
{1} Chicago is in Cook county.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


275
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-39.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,275 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 39
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[From an interview with the former marketing director of the
Arkansas Development and Finance Authority, and former associate
of Bill Clinton, Larry Nichols. This interview took place on the
May 5, 1994 "America's Town Forum" radio show, hosted by Tom
Donahue. The show is broadcast most weekday evenings at 7 pm
(cst) on shortwave frequency 5.810 mHz. (Nichols speaks via
telephone with Donahue.)]
[...continued...]
TOM DONAHUE: We're back. Tom Donahue, "America's Town Forum,"
patriotism in action, 1-800-298-8255.
Larry Nichols, our special guest. He worked with Bill Clinton
when he was Governor. He was the marketing director of the
Arkansas Development and Finance Authority [ADFA].
How long were you at this agency, and what problems did you
encounter? I guess you had a moral dilemma and you resigned?
LARRY NICHOLS: I apologize for having to get off the phone. A
California truck pulls up in my driveway and sets there, I get a
little nervous...
DONAHUE: Yeah.
NICHOLS: ...and, uh, as it turns out, they left. {1}. And I was
on a talk show this morning -- I'm a little paranoid -- and the
talk show received death threats, so, uh...
DONAHUE: I understand.
NICHOLS: It gets a little rough sometimes.
I was there [ADFA] from February of '88 until September of '88.
It didn't take me long to get in and get out. The dilemma that I
was involved in is simple: If you're standing next to someone,
and they rob a 7-11, you have two choices: you either say
nothing, at which point you become a part of the crime, or you
tell the truth, which removes culpability. The problem I had...
DONAHUE: You're talking either an accomplice or a whistle blower.
NICHOLS: That's it.
DONAHUE: One way or the other.
NICHOLS: And it's not a good position to be in, I can assure you.
The problem I had at ADFA, you see the... when I first went
there, they wouldn't include me in anything. When I'm the
marketing guy, how can you not include me?
Well in about 2 months I started going to the board meetings. And
I found out that people that should get loans, didn't; people
that shouldn't [get loans], got 'em. And I went to the president,
Lou Knepp(?), and I asked, "What's the criteria? We have a
problem if people find out about this." And he said, "It's
whoever Bill [Clinton] wants to get the loan."
Then I found out. The thing that startled me and scared me most,
which was... (and I kind of hate to have to do these little
histories, but you know, it's complicated.)
DONAHUE: Yes. Um-hmm. [affirmative]
NICHOLS: Mena airport was going strong in those days. And, uh,
the Mena airport, for your listeners, is the little place in
Arkansas, 5500-6000 people, and it had an airport that would land
jets.
Barry Seal, who was hauling arms and supplies to the *Contras*
during the early '80s {2}, had figured out that, goodness, he
could bring his planes back and the DEA [Drug Enforcement Agency]
would not touch them because they were CIA planes. So he started
back hauling, from Columbia and Panama, cocaine. And he was
running 100 million a month in cocaine through the little Mena
airport. Well the problem at Mena was, you got that much cocaine
and you've got that much money -- but you have to launder that
money. Dan Lasater, Bill Clinton's best friend, who went to jail
with Roger Clinton for cocaine -- not selling it, but giving it
away -- had a bonding, a bonding house. And guess what? He did
the bond underwriting for ADFA.
We found out 2 weeks ago from a high-ranking, ex-CIA official, a
person who is authentic and he is on the record, that Dan Lasater
was indeed the man that [Barry] Seal used to launder the money.
For Mena. Some of that laundered money went into the Arkansas
Development Finance Authority.
DONAHUE: Did you know that at the time?
NICHOLS: I didn't know it, but I found it out.
DONAHUE: Um-hmm. [understands]
NICHOLS: And uh, what they were doing, they would issue a bond
and let's say give, like I told your audience before, Webster
Hubbell {3}, who created ADFA -- I mean drafted it, legislated
it, got it passed -- he and his father-in-law, Seth Ward, got the
first loan at ADFA for $2.85 million. You can't find that he ever
paid anybody back.
Other, other recipients of "loans" were Don Tyson, Tyson
Industries, International Paper.
Well the problem at ADFA was you couldn't find one person that
*ever bought the bonds*. What Lasater was doing was taking the
drug money, running it through ADFA as if people were buying the
bonds. That money would lead ADFA to one of the banks that they
used out of state, 2 of which I think were in BCCI's [Bank of
Credit and Commerce International, a.k.a. Bank of Crooks and
Criminals International] network. And the other underwriter of
bonds at ADFA at the time was none other than Stephens'
investment firm. And the man that brought BCCI to America was
Jackson Stephens.
One of the banks they used in Chicago, Guaranty, guess who owns
part of it? Dan Rostenkowski. {4}.
DONAHUE: Dan Rostenkowski, yeah. Um-hmm [pensive].
NICHOLS: Now you understand the rest of the story, why when Bill
Clinton first got elected he fired the federal prosecutor that
was on Rostenkowski's case. You also see now why he broke
precedent and went to Chicago and campaigned in a primary [for
"Rosty"].
DONAHUE: But isn't it poetic justice that this Mr. Stevens {5}
shows up, working in another department which ended up being Bill
Clinton's worst haunt?
NICHOLS: [laughs] Yes it was. And uh, Mr. Stephanopoulos is gonna
be a "sacrificial lamb" for that little exercise.
DONAHUE: Now, because of the verbal exchange and he was upset
that Jay Stevens had been hired there and how could that have
happened?
NICHOLS: Absolutely. Now you see, to show you how slick Clinton
was, when he held his infamous press conference he said that no
one in his cabinet called them. Well let me give your audience a
little clue, or something they didn't know: *Time* magazine, as
you know, wrote that Saturday, with their [news] feed, saying
that, in fact, Stephanopoulos *had* called the RTC [Resolution
Trust Corporation]. Bill Clinton knew it that night. He knew that
that story was coming. Yet he stood there and lied to the
American people and said they knew nothing about it. And you
would think, "Gosh, what a technical blunder on his part. I mean,
that was stupid."
It isn't. You see, I don't know what *Time* magazine's
circulation is, but let's give it some millions. That does not
match the hundreds of million that prime time TV brings to it.
DONAHUE: Right. Um-hmm. [understands]
NICHOLS: So some millions [read] the truth. But hundreds of
millions of people heard him lie and believed it.
DONAHUE: Now Jay Stevens was a former U.S. attorney who was
investigating Rostenkowski in the district there. Um, then he
ended up with, um, what's the oversight organization regarding
S&Ls? [Savings & Loans]
NICHOLS: Um, the RTC?
DONAHUE: Yeah. Right. So he ended up working out of that
department instead. And *he* was the one that, for the most part,
initiated the investigation into Whitewater and Madison Guaranty.
NICHOLS: Absolutely. And again, there's no connection between Jay
Stevens and Jackson Stephens. Jackson Stephens is the wealthy man
from Stephens investment firm out of Little Rock.
DONAHUE: Right. Um-hmm [understands]. Now what was Bill Clinton
to gain, besides satisfying his corporate interests there in the
state? Uh, let's talk about the direct connection that Bill
Clinton... how he benefited through the Arkansas Development and
Finance Authority.
NICHOLS: Well they, Bill Clinton and the power brokers, the
Stephens, the "good ol' boy" political machine -- it's been
around for over 100 years -- have been grooming Bill Clinton to
run for President for 20 years.
The way he gained is, [for] every one of those loans, they had to
make major campaign contributions. As a matter of fact, during
the primary, when no other person could raise money, -- and I'm
talking about Paul Tsongas, Kerry, I mean these are known
entities -- Bill Clinton got $1.78 million of his campaign money
from tentacles that are from ADFA. He got the balance of his
money from tentacles that are the Stephens investment firm.
Now. When he entered the race as President, the day he entered,
he had $10 million. And if you understand primary races, the man
that wins in a primary is the person with money.
DONAHUE: He also used the same tentacles to acquire the
Governorship.
NICHOLS: Absolutely. Now the problem that the American people
have today, Tom, is this: When you deal with these people, you
owe them. And now the American people "owe" those power brokers.
DONAHUE: We'll be right back. Larry Nichols is our special guest.
Stay tuned.
(to be continued)
--------------------------<< Notes >>----------------------------
{1} Nichols' nervousness regarding the "California truck" that
pulled into his driveway and sat there originates in the large
number of apparent "suicides" and violent deaths of persons who
have been connected with Bill Clinton. See, for example, "The
Clinton Body Count" by Linda Thompson.
{2} "...who was hauling arms and supplies to the *Contras* during
the early '80s..." *That*, in itself, was illegal. Putting aside
for the moment the issue of bringing back cocaine, just smuggling
arms to the *Contras* was a violation of the Boland amendment.
{3} "...Webster Hubbell..." On April 19, 1993, the day of the
"final solution" to the problem of the Branch Davidian standoff,
Webster Hubbell was the highest ranking official in the FBI
operations center and remained in phone contact with ground
commanders throughout the siege. [Source: "The Massacre of the
Branch Davidians" by the Committee for Waco Justice. PO Box
33037, Washington, DC 20033. Phones: (202) 986-1847, (202) 797-
9877.]
{4} The Arkansas-Chicago connection: Covered by Sherman Skolnick
and included in a "Conspiracy for the Day -- Special Edition."
Excerpts below:
A big cover-up with congressman Dan Rostenkowski of
Chicago, arranged by the corrupt IRS, the Justice
Department, and the White House.
[...]
The hundreds of millions of dollars per month from
cocaine and such was reportedly funneled through
Garfield Ridge Trust and Savings Bank of Chicago. The
bank has been owned and operated by congressman
Rostenkowski and his cronies, who have commented on the
bank's reported criminality for some 20 years now.
[...]
{5} "...Mr. Stevens..." To my recollection, it is spelled
"Stevens" and not "Stephens." I refer to Jay Stevens, an
apparently *real* prosecutor who was investigating ADFA, etc. and
was pulled off the case. The "poetic justice" that Donahue
mentions is that Stevens wound up investigating Stephens.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


225
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-40.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 40
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[From an interview with the former marketing director of the
Arkansas Development and Finance Authority, and former associate
of Bill Clinton, Larry Nichols. This interview took place on the
May 5, 1994 "America's Town Forum" radio show, hosted by Tom
Donahue. The show is broadcast most weekday evenings at 7 pm
(cst) on shortwave frequency 5.810 mHz. (Nichols speaks via
telephone with Donahue.)]
[...continued...]
TOM DONAHUE: We're back. Tom Donahue, "America's Town Forum,"
patriotism in action.
Many of you have the video -- at least some of you have the video
-- *Clinton's Circle of Power* (or actually, it should be called
*Clinton's Circle of Thugs*) um, and quite a few of those went
out this week. So look in your mailbox for those.
If you want to order *Clinton's Circle of Power*, we're making it
available through our organization. Twenty dollars. Just write to
us -- mention the video *Clinton's Circle of Power* -- America
First, P.O. Box 720055, Dallas, Texas, 75372.
And the soon-to-be-released, *The Clinton Chronicles*. We'll be
telling you more about that.
Larry, where did we leave off? I think we were at the point where
Clinton was the beneficiary of these loans. Um, not just loans,
but I guess they were campaign contributions to keep him in the
governorship, as well as to run for President.
LARRY NICHOLS: Absolutely. And then people need to understand
that in Arkansas, it's a small state, and if you have the money,
you have the power. And it was through the money, through the
power, that Bill Clinton obtained control of the state police, of
the court system, of all the attorneys -- I mean, if you crossed
Bill Clinton, your attorneys license was lost. If you crossed
Bill Clinton and you were a doctor, you lost your doctor's
license.
DONAHUE: But if you were a friend of Bill, you could be like
Jocelyn Elders and murder people {1} or like his mother and be
incompetent as an anesthetist.
NICHOLS: That's right. And if you were against Bill, you also
faced one of the potentials of being one of the mysterious deaths
that never seem to get solved.
DONAHUE: Let's talk about, um, because that's most important
here, um, let's name some of the folks that have died. We do have
this son of Jerry Parks, Gary Parks, on with us tomorrow.
NICHOLS: That's right. And, uh, Gary came to me about 3 or 4
months ago, scared. They were being followed by the same people
that follow me. And they needed help, he and his mother. And I
told him the best thing he could do to protect his family -- and
I won't get into the story, so... if it messes you up tomorrow --
but the best thing that he could do would be to come out and tell
his story. Because even with me, there's been a certain amount of
protection by doin' that.
It's tragic what happened to his dad. All he was guilty of, all
his dad died for, was simply knowing Bill Clinton and the sleaze
of his operation.
Then you go to Ambrose Evans-Pritchard. I had an informant from
Hot Springs, a dentist. He was gonna tell Ambrose. I had an
interview set up on a Friday. The man called me, said he was
scared, it was too hot, he was leaving the state. I begged him
not to go. He went anyway. He told me to re-schedule for Tuesday.
On Sunday, I had to call Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, with the
*[London] Sunday Telegraph*, and tell him that... not to bother
coming back because his informant was dead.
Then you've got the L.J. Davises of the world; reporters that
came in here. He was investigating the Stephens and Mena and ADFA
-- that connection. He left town with a knot on his head.
Somebody had broken in and hit him over the head. {2}.
DONAHUE: And examined his notes. {3}. And what they were looking
through was the information on this bond scam that you were...
NICHOLS: Yes sir. That's it.
Gary Lane, from Pat Robertson [CBN]. They come in. They started
investigating Mena and ADFA. {4}. They get death threats. They
leave town.
DONAHUE: Gary Lane with Pat Robertson's network, the Christian
Broadcast Network?
NICHOLS: Yes sir.
So you see? I mean, it's pretty rough here.
DONAHUE: Now let's, for our listeners, because, um, in case
they're not able to tune in tomorrow or... give 'em a "teaser,"
in a nice kind of way, but I think they need to hear this and
they need to act on this: let's talk about Jerry Parks. And the
fact is, he *was* a political foe. He was investigating Clinton
for many years. He built up files. But then he became a security
director. His company was the security detail for the Clinton-
Gore campaign. How'd that happen?
NICHOLS: Well Bill Clinton has a policy that was adopted years
ago: The best place to have your enemies is working for ya. So it
is not uncommon that Bill Clinton would have known the file that
Mr. Parks had. And to protect that file, they gave him a
lucrative contract to secure the campaign headquarters and
eventually the transition headquarters.
DONAHUE: So you neutralize by way of hiring, bringing them into
your fold. And then you have that control. And then you may have
to also find out *what* they have, and perhaps even "take 'em
out." [i.e. assassinate them]
NICHOLS: That's right. It is my theory, and at this point it is
only a theory, that Mr. Parks took his file, which was his last
official act for the Clinton campaign, he was to meet someone to
receive payment, his final payment. And instead of being paid, he
was assassinated. Brutally. They shot him twice then drove down
the road, turned around and came back, and shot him point-blank
10 more times. {5}.
I was sitting with Gary Parks just last week, at the police
department, with the investigator. The investigator said that it
was a "hit," but told Gary that they probably would never solve
it.
DONAHUE: We'll come right back, with our guest, and talk more
about this "hit." Stay tuned.
(to be continued)
--------------------------<< Notes >>----------------------------
{1} "...be like Jocelyn Elders and murder people." I'm not sure
what this refers to. I am unaware that Jocelyn Elders has
murdered anyone. Donahue gives no further information as to this
claim.
{2} (Regarding L.J. Davis.) L.J. Davis went to Arkansas to
research a subsequent *New Republic* cover story on Whitewater,
etc. Here is what happened to him, as described in the *Wall
Street Journal*, March 23, 1994:
He was returning to his room at Little Rock's Legacy
Hotel about 6:30 after an interview on the evening of
Feb. 13. The last thing he remembers is putting his key
in the door, and the next thing he remembers is waking
up face down on the floor, with his arm twisted under
his body and a big lump on his head above his left ear.
The room door was shut and locked. Nothing was missing
except four "significant" pages of his notebook that
included a list of his sources in Little Rock.
["Censored in Arkansas," WSJ, 3/23/94]
{3} "And examined his notes..." Not just *examined* his notes but
*ripped out* four pages from his notebook. See above, note #2.
What do LaRouche et al. say about this? Was conking Davis over
the head and stealing his notes also part of the British plot to
discredit Clinton? What say ye, Crocker?
{4} (Regarding the CBN [Christian Broadcasting Network]
investigation of Mena, ADFA, etc.) See "Conspiracy for the Day --
May 4 and May 5, 1994," "The Arkansas Connection."
See also "Conspiracy for the Day -- April 21, 1994," for a
glimpse of the atmosphere of terror in Arkansas. Here are
excerpts from that "CfD" where an anonymous reporter discusses
his impressions of Arkansas:
REPORTER: Jerry, we spent a lot of time with Larry
Nichols, who's actually featured in the Clinton video.
Everywhere that we went, with Larry, we were followed.
It was very obvious. We'd sit down at a coffee shop,
we'd have our lunch with him, and there would be a
[state] trooper; a trooper would come in and sit down.
We would get up. We'd leave. They would leave. And they
were just wherever we were. In fact, we did a few things
to check things out to see if it wasn't just a
coincidence, and actually we were being followed. No
doubt about it.
You know, I have filmed all over the world. I've been
doing this for many, many, many years. And I tell you, I
have never been in a situation that I've seen the
paranoia that I've seen in Arkansas.
Now very few people would actually agree to be on
camera, but we talked to many, many more who would talk
with us off-camera. And the thing that I discovered with
all of them was they'd always kind of speak with a
hushed voice, and they'd always kind of be looking
around, looking around, to see if somebody was there
listening to them. There is a fear in Arkansas that I
just really can't describe.
{5} (Regarding the murder of Jerry Parks.) *Maybe* it was another
"lone nut" that for no good reason just drilled him full of
holes. Either that, or there was some motive. Was it robbery? Did
someone drive up beside him and shoot him twice, drive off, turn
around and drive back, shoot him "point-blank" 10 times -- all
this just to rob him? There seems to be just one candidate for
being the most likely explanation: a political assassination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


258
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-41.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 41
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[From an interview with the former marketing director of the
Arkansas Development and Finance Authority, and former associate
of Bill Clinton, Larry Nichols. This interview took place on the
May 5, 1994 "America's Town Forum" radio show, hosted by Tom
Donahue. The show is broadcast most weekday evenings at 7 pm
(cst) on shortwave frequency 5.810 mHz. (Nichols speaks via
telephone with Donahue.)]
[...continued...]
TOM DONAHUE: We're back. Tom Donahue, "America's Town Forum."
We're talking with Larry Nichols. He worked in the Clinton...
actually, ADFA, that's the Arkansas Development and Finance
Authority, when Clinton was Governor.
Um, a few more things on Mr. Parks. Uh, he... Who was he working
for when he was collecting information, as a private investigator
in his company, against Bill Clinton?
LARRY NICHOLS: Well, they don't really know. Just yesterday, I
found out from Gary [Parks] that his mother told *him* for the
first time that he was working for a congressman. And he started
getting information in '83, taking pictures of Bill Clinton with
women, drugs, etc.
DONAHUE: He built up an extensive file.
NICHOLS: Yessir, he did. And that file is missing today.
DONAHUE: Now the house, now, as you said, we'll get into that
more with Gary, his son, tomorrow. In both hours.
NICHOLS: Let's talk about a current one, Vince Foster.
DONAHUE: Let's do that.
NICHOLS: What did Vince Foster know that would cause him to have
to die?
Number 1, he was Hillary's boyfriend. Had been for years. Now I
brought that up in my 1990 lawsuit, the one that brought up
Gennifer Flowers, Whitewater. All that stuff's been layin' there
since 1990.
DONAHUE: And trooper Patterson said that during one of the
parties that Bill [Clinton] was not at, Hillary and Vince Foster
were... *He saw* Vince Foster, uh, touch, fondle Hillary and she
was pleased with that kind of fondling and uh, gave the trooper a
"thumbs up."
NICHOLS: Yeah. As a matter of fact, the troopers also stated that
they had delivered Vince and Hillary to the Rose Law Firm
"retreat," to spend weekends together.
DONAHUE: Yes.
NICHOLS: But Vince Foster was involved with that.
Vince Foster knew about the insider trading on the pharmaceutical
stock. Vince Foster knew that we were comin' at 'em with
Whitewater. Vince Foster knew I was comin' at 'em with ADFA. And
all of which he was involved in.
I believe Vince was about to "snap." I think the pressure was
getting... with "Travelgate," etc. The next thing, you find out
he's dead.
Now let's take the death. The original 2 ambulance drivers that
picked up Vince Foster's body were amazed when they put the body
on the stretcher, because there was no blood. One of 'em even
said he didn't even have to wash his hands.
As you know, about a month ago (I don't know the exact date, but
on a Friday), the Park Police [a.k.a. the "meter maids"], with
all the rumors going around -- and especially if you've seen our
tape. On the tape I tell you about the inconsistencies: no powder
burns on the lip, teeth or gums; no puddle of blood; no big
amount of blood. Well the Park Police did a mysterious thing:
they released a picture, released 2 pictures, to ABC. And *only*
ABC.
DONAHUE: Um-hmm [understands]
NICHOLS: And it was supposed to dispel the rum... you know, the
rumors.
Let me tell you what was wrong with those pictures. Not to get
into great detail, but they're absolute frauds. And I can prove
it simply. If you go to the picture where they are showing the
gun in the hand, and there, laying there from the waist down to
the crotch, you'll notice red, brown and yellow leaves all over.
Folks, July the 20th, there are no leaves on the ground in
Washington, D.C.
DONAHUE: Well how could they mess up so bad? I mean, I don't
understand how they could be so stupid.
NICHOLS: Well, a lot of people have said, "Well watch out, they
did that on purpose to trip you up." You gotta understand, Bill
Clinton and his team are not perfect. And imagine this: If you're
the President... Even if you're the President of the United
States and you wake up one day and you say, "Golly. I'm gonna be
'framed' for this murder. So I need to call somebody and get
those pictures doctored." Who would you call? You see, Bill
Clinton runs a *tight* circle of power. A *tight* loop. If he
picked up the phone and called *you*, Tom, and said, "I need you
to doctor these pictures," and you said, "no," he's got a leak.
Because you might go to the media and say, "This guy called me,
trying to get the pictures doctored!"
DONAHUE: Right. Um-hmm [understands]
NICHOLS: So I don't think you'll find they have the absolute
expertise available. And to be honest, I don't think they even
thought about it. And to be even more honest, I don't think they
cared. Because you will notice, other than me, who has challenged
those pictures? And I've taken it to other networks. They've had
it looked at. They've authenticated what I've said. But they're
not gonna get in a contest with ABC.
DONAHUE: Right. Obviously, uh, the media's having to cover this
in greater detail with Paula Jones coming forward with her sexual
harassment suit. And when you hire Bill Bennett's brother, it
shows you how the difference between Republicans and Democrats
[chuckles], I mean, I say that "tongue in cheek." You have Bill
Bennett's brother representing Bill Clinton in this case and
perhaps in his legal wranglings over "Whitewater-gate."
NICHOLS: Yes. And you see, the Paula Jones story... I talked to
her and her husband yesterday. She is filing today. It's very
important that your audience understand: There's a difference
between Gennifer...
DONAHUE: Was that not officially filed yesterday? Or was there...
NICHOLS: No sir. They were supposed to and they backed off. And
they're filing today.
DONAHUE: Today. O.K.
NICHOLS: There's a difference between Gennifer Flowers and the
other women that had affairs with him. And this lady, Tom, this
lady *is* a lady [i.e. Paula Jones]. She's your wife, my wife,
our daughters, all your audience's daughters, sisters, wives.
And you see, it's the same thing with her. She was walking down
the street, essentially, and Bill Clinton said, "I want that
woman." He sent Danny Ferguson, a state police officer, to
solicit her, bring her to him. And she said, "No." This woman
said, "No." And she's scared to death because she knows what I
have been honor-bound to tell her: That Bill Clinton and his
"spin doctors" are gonna do everything in their power to destroy
this woman's reputation, her life. And she said, "No."
DONAHUE: Did not Paula Jones work for Clinton?
NICHOLS: She worked for the state. The actual event occurred
while the AIDC, the Arkansas Industrial Development Commission,
was having a convention. She was working the floor of the
convention. A state trooper came down and told her that the
Governor wanted to meet her, or talk with her. If you're a state
employee and the Governor says, "Come on," you come on!
DONAHUE: Well absolutely.
NICHOLS: When she got to the room, she noticed the trooper stood
at the door, right outside the door, but didn't come in. Bill
Clinton immediately said he wanted her to have oral sex with him.
She was shocked. She said, "No." And then he pulled down his
britches and exposed himself. And she left. She was upset and she
left.
Now. There's more evidence than I've shared with you. But again,
we need to let that be resolved through the court system. And we
need to let her attorneys justify, and her, her position. [CN --
To contribute to Paula Jones' legal fund, call 1-800-91 TRUTH.]
DONAHUE: How long ago was that?
NICHOLS: Well the problem is, it was like her 3-year statute of
limitation runs out tomorrow. Now the big question, and the
whole...
DONAHUE: We're talking early 1990s which is, you know, I mean
pretty recent.
NICHOLS: Right. So the problem that they're gonna attack her with
is credibility, because she waited so long to file. Let me assure
you, in 19...
DONAHUE: It didn't affect Anita Hill.
NICHOLS: No.
DONAHUE: Anita Hill had all the time in the world.
NICHOLS: Well I know. But in 1988 I tried to get an attorney in
Arkansas. You could not get one to fight Bill Clinton. And then
if you'll notice, when her event occurred soon after that he was
running for President. Soon after that he was President. So bless
this little lady's heart, she *tried*, early on, to get an
apology. She was also engaged at the time. She had a real mental
problem with her husband-to-be finding out, and what it would do.
As soon as she finally told her husband, then it was over. He did
the right thing and said, "Come on." And they sought out, and
they couldn't find, a "high dollar," good attorney. They ended up
taking Danny Traler(?), which I'm not "knocking" him, but he's a
real estate attorney.
Now yesterday, you'll notice, they put on a show of strength, to
prove to Traler and to Paula what's gonna happen to 'em. They
hired the biggest name attorney they could hire, they attacked
Paula, and they attacked their attorney. And it was designed to
scare 'em -- which it did. Hopefully it would scare them from
filing, which it did not do.
And Tom, the thing, and this is the most significant, other than
the fact she said, "No.": Think about Congress now. What are they
gonna do? On one hand, they're trying to roast and destroy Bob
Packwood. They had nowhere near the evidence that this lady has.
Now what are they gonna do? Are they gonna say, "Uh oh. Now we're
after Packwood and now our 'fearless leader' is accused of the
same thing, with more evidence. We roasted Anita Hill's uh,
Clarence Thomas." What are they gonna do? Are they going to
pursue Clinton like they pursued Packwood? Or are they gonna have
to drop Packwood and say, "Well. Nothin' on him either."
You see, Congress is *in a bind*. And I will say one more thing.
DONAHUE: Call it "Hypocrisy-gate." We've gotta take a break. And
hold that thought. We're gonna go to your calls, I promise, in
just moments. 1-800-298-8255.
(to be continued)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


235
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-42.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 42
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[From an interview with the former marketing director of the
Arkansas Development and Finance Authority, and former associate
of Bill Clinton, Larry Nichols. This interview took place on the
May 5, 1994 "America's Town Forum" radio show, hosted by Tom
Donahue. The show is broadcast most weekday evenings at 7 pm
(cst) on shortwave frequency 5.810 mHz. (Nichols speaks via
telephone with Donahue.)]
[...continued...]
TOM DONAHUE: We're back. We're talking with Larry Nichols. He has
a major part, and contributor in, 2 videos: *The Clinton
Chronicles* will be soon released. And he's in the *Clinton's
Circle of Power* video. We're making that available for $20.
Um, I guess you could really call it *Clinton's Circle of Thugs*,
or *Clinton's Lust for Power*, 'cause that's really what we have
here, don't we Larry? (And I want you to pick up where you left
off.)
LARRY NICHOLS: Yessir, it is. And to go back where I was. The
incredible thing last week was, I got 5 calls from Wall Street,
whatever you call 'em, brokerage firm people, wanting to know if
the Paula Jones suit was gonna be filed. And I said, "Yes, I
believe it is." They said, "Well you can't do that, basically,
because the dollar versus the yen," (whatever that means), "is
like at 100 and, one more scandal is going to destroy the dollar-
yen whatever."
And what I had to tell 'em was, "You don't seem to understand.
Paula Jones didn't do anything wrong. All of the stuff I've been
doin', I haven't done anything wrong. The bombshell that's coming
Sunday isn't my fault. The problem is Bill Clinton. If the
market's unstable, it's *him*, not us."
DONAHUE: You've got these financial wheeler-dealers, uh wanting
to protect our financial assets, rather than the nation's assets
and what's in the best pursuit and light of justice. They're
calling you and I guess threatening, or implying threats, if you
don't do something about, uh stifling this woman.
NICHOLS: Yeah. I mean they didn't threaten *me*, but they said,
you know, "You're destroying the economy."
I'm not destroying anything. *He* is.
DONAHUE: They wanted you to believe that if this would go
forward, that it would destroy the economy, the united States,
and that should supersede justice prevailing.
NICHOLS: That's right. Now the good news is, the reason Bill
Clinton will be forced to resign at the end of this month, the
first of next, is because, you see, it's starting to affect the
*Power*. You see, Clinton's not the power. He's a cheap, tin man.
As a matter of fact, now that the Paula Jones' story is out, you
understand that he's really a sexual pervert. He's "white trash."
But he's probably 5th to 7th level player. And Stephens, for
example, the people that own him, are probably maybe 3 or 4
level. I don't even *know* who's the 1st and 2nd level! But you
see, he's starting to affect their money. And they're going to
explain to Bill Clinton, as this stuff proceeds, that *now*, his
bein' President is hurting him... or hurting *them*. And they'll
give him an explanation, that he will understand, that he needs
to go ahead and resign.
DONAHUE: They'll make him an "offer he can't refuse."
NICHOLS: Absolutely.
DONAHUE: And it won't be a pretty picture if he says no.
NICHOLS: I would think with the Vince Foster death, that they can
prove their point fairly clearly.
DONAHUE: Gotcha.
O.K. Let's take a couple calls here. Thanks for being so patient,
callers. Let's go to Carol in Boston. Hi, Carol.
CAROL: Good morning, Tom...
DONAHUE: Hi. Go ahead.
CAROL: ...and Mr. Nichols. I can hardly hear you.
Anyway. I have a question for Mr. Nichols. I heard him on this
talk show, and he talked about 2 sealed indictments that were
"coming down" this week?
NICHOLS: Yes, ma'am. There are 2 sealed indictments. I did not
say they were "coming down" this week.
CAROL: Oh. I'm sorry.
NICHOLS: Um, through my sources... Now this is interesting, and
you need to hear the whole story. Through my sources, I
understand...
DONAHUE: Let's let Carol go and listen on her radio. Go ahead,
Larry.
NICHOLS: I have very good confidence in my sources. Indictments
were sealed for Betsy Wright and George Stephanopoulos for
obstruction of justice, perjury before a grand jury.
Now. A sealed indictment can stay sealed for years. A sealed
indictment generally means that the prosecutors are trying to
leverage that person into turning state's evidence against the
next person up.
Robert Fiske came out, and remember, in a grand jury you're
never, in that kind of a thing, you're never supposed to reveal
what's going on. {1}.
The *Washington Times*, in a rumors column (and remember, it's a
rumor at this point), in the rumors column of the *Washington
Times* they said that there are indictments and others coming,
sealed, against Stephanopoulos and Betsy Wright.
Fiske came out and said openly that there is no indictment. Now,
you can't have it both ways. Either don't talk about it, or do
talk about it. Don't tell people that they can't find out
information, and then tell them information when it benefits
Clinton.
DONAHUE: Right. At this point it's pure speculation.
NICHOLS: Well it's something when the man, the lead prosecutor,
comes out on pure speculation, and on a rumor, and tries to
dispel it. Now think about the magnitude of that. If the paper
had said they *had* the documents, then he could respond.
DONAHUE: Absolutely.
NICHOLS: It's *incredible* what's going on.
DONAHUE: What do you think of Mr. Fiske?
NICHOLS: He's an absolute "ringer" [i.e. not what he seems]. Let
me give you another example.
When Gary Lane of CBN was in town, they had stumbled into, at
ADFA, they had seen a document that was very damning. No one had
ever seen it before. They started pressuring 'em. *The next day*,
in comes Fiske's people and subpoenas those documents and seals
'em from the light of day.
Just last Thursday, the Chicago Board of Trade said they found
all of the trades that Hillary made.
DONAHUE: Right.
NICHOLS: Friday mornin' at 9 o'clock, Robert Fiske seals those...
files a subpoena and seals *that* information.
DONAHUE: He's like a paper "Pac-man," goin' around scarfing up
everything that could be brought out in the public view. Uh, and
God only knows what he's gonna do with it.
NICHOLS: How can he, Tom, represent the people of America when,
in fact, he represented BCCI and Clark Clifford? And Whitewater
is going to lead in, since it's the same cast of characters, to
BCCI. And he can't prosecute former clients. He can't prosecute,
he can't investigate International Paper. International Paper
sold 200 some acres to Whitewater, got a loan at ADFA. He can't
investigate them because he represented 'em.
DONAHUE: L.J. Davis, in his article (and we've interviewed him),
"The Name of the Rose," talked in detail about BCCI and their
connections and how they got started in Little Rock...
NICHOLS: That's right. So you see...
DONAHUE: ...within the confines of the united States.
NICHOLS: So ya see how we're outnumbered? I mean here's Robert
Fiske, appointed by Janet Reno, who represented Clark Clifford,
who got off because Clinton, literally, "gave him a walk"
[pardoned him].
DONAHUE: But the excuse was, "He's an old man."
NICHOLS: Well I hope when I get to be his age I can run around
and break every law in the book and not pay for it. Because I'll
leave my family with a lot of money when I die!
DONAHUE: There ya go.
(to be continued)
---------------------------<< Notes >>---------------------------
{1} "In a grand jury... you're never supposed to reveal what's
going on." Unless the case involves Commerce Secretary Ron Brown,
that is. From "Conspiracy for the Day," November 17, 1993:
But evidence suggests someone, perhaps at the Justice
Department, is leaking details of the Grand Jury
investigation. *That* is a violation of federal law. In
its October 11th issue, a source close to Brown detailed
for *Time* magazine some of the testimony taken by the
Federal Grand Jury. And officials at the White House
reportedly told *Time* in a later issue that the Grand
Jury investigation "is virtually complete and they are
confident Brown will be pleased with the results."
BURTON [Congressman Dan Burton of Indiana]: I don't know
how the White House, or Mr. Brown or anybody else would
know what is going on in any Grand Jury room. And I
don't understand why Mr. Ly is not being called. He
should be called. The Grand Jury should get all of the
information possible so they can make an informed
decision on whether or not to indict Mr. Brown.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


129
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-43.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 43
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[CN Editor -- I cannot vouch for the accuracy of *all* of the
following. It may or may not be true, I just don't know.]
[The following is a transcript of a recorded phone message put
out by a group in Chicago called "Citizens' Committee to Clean Up
the Courts [CCCC]." (312) 731-1100 and (312) 731-1505.]
Hi! Sherman Skolnick, Citizens' Committee to Clean Up the Courts,
9800 Oglesby.
More about Bank of Credit and Commerce International [BCCI].
In exclusive details, we told you how this bank bribed and/or
blackmailed more than 20 percent of the U.S. House of
Representatives and the Senate. Reportedly used were 6 LaSalle
street commodities brokers, including CapCom and GSP(?)
Commodities. CapCom was owned, in part, by TeleCommunications,
Incorporated [TCI], the largest group of cable TV systems in the
nation.
BCCI has been a large, secret shareholder in TCI, as well as
Turner Broadcasting's CNN and the parent firm of ABC News, and
helped finance deals of the chairman of CBS, Incorporated.
So the news fakers are not about to give you real details.
The press keeps saying BCCI went under. *Oh yeah?* Yet Bank Indo-
Suez(?) of Paris took over their operation in the united States
and worldwide.
Another group reportedly tied in to BCCI are so-called "religious
broadcasters." In Chicago, channel 38 TV has been headed by Jerry
Rose, recent president of the National Religious Broadcasters.
Rose is reportedly closely linked to International Consultants,
Incorporated. They apparently are part of deals with known
weapons smugglers supplying terrorist organizations! Such as Abu
Nidal.
Those who recently picketed channel 38 demanded that Rose
immediately break his unholy connection.
Sources close to the problem contend there are vouchers showing
mysterious transfers of large amounts through BCCI to Rose and
others in his field.
Our chairman [CCCC] recently interviewed a vice-president and the
operations chief of channel 38. They both insist that the audit
of the corporation does not show any BCCI transfers to the
corporation itself. And they shift the blame to their boss, Jerry
Rose, by saying what *he* does is his private life.
Bank of Criminals and Conspirators International [BCCI] also had
so-called "auditors" who gave them an O.K. right up to the time
the press said that the bank, with 473 branches in 70 countries,
went under.
Pat Robertson is *another* religious broadcasting hotshot who
reportedly got big bucks from, and through, BCCI. How'd it happen
that from obscure background and beginnings, Robertson *shot up*
like a rocket?!
Now to sidestep the IRS, Robertson took in a partner: the cable
giant we mentioned, TeleCommunications, Incorporated, tied to
BCCI.
These "holy rollers" in turn have business links to a known
religious broadcaster who is also a known merchant of death in
South Africa!
The news fakers describe BCCI as an Arab bank. *Oh yeah!?* Yet
they have been operated in some 70 countries by the American CIA,
the French CIA, Israeli Intelligence (the Mossad), and other
spymasters.
Publicly, they mouth off "Jesus Christ" almost every other breath.
Privately, they seem to worship the secret gold statues of
espionage. Cynics call them simply part of the "Assembly of
Satan." {1}.
So these religious fakers, in their heart of hearts, how do
*they* explain what their own so-called "beliefs" call an
"offense against Heaven," huh?
In Chicago, see us on cable tv, channel 21, 9 pm [cst] most
Monday evenings.
Play it again: The Corruption in the State's Attorneys Office.
(312) 731-1505.
New message Friday; we change it several times a week.
Donations appreciated. Citizen's Committee to Clean Up the
Courts, 9800 South Oglesby, Chicago, [Illinois] 60617. For the
latest on courts, banks, espionage agencies, political
assassinations, and the news media. On 24 hours a day.
------------------------<< Notes >>------------------------------
{1} While there are no doubt unscrupulous persons calling
themselves "Christians," that does not negate the fact that there
are millions of good people throughout the world who sincerely do
their best to practice that faith. Although I myself would not
call myself a "Christian," because I do not agree with their
tenet that they are the "one true faith," nevertheless I,
personally, have been most favorably impressed by and helped by
*true* Christians. I have a number of Christian friends who have
been a major blessing in my life and, in fact, I cannot begin to
express how nice they have been to me.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


188
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-44.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 44
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[From an interview with the former marketing director of the
Arkansas Development and Finance Authority, and former associate
of Bill Clinton, Larry Nichols. This interview took place on the
May 5, 1994 "America's Town Forum" radio show, hosted by Tom
Donahue. The show is broadcast most weekday evenings at 7 pm
(cst) on shortwave frequency 5.810 mHz. (Nichols speaks via
telephone with Donahue.)]
[...continued...]
TOM DONAHUE: Jeff, in Dallas. Go ahead.
Ask your question, Jeff.
JEFF: Uh, yes. Mr. Nichols. Do you have in your possession the
paperwork that shows that the money that came from ADFA *did* go
into Clinton's political campaign? Can you prove that? And if you
can, then how come they're not asking you [for it?] And I know
they're calling you a liar, and the media's just spinnin' this
out of control...
DONAHUE: O.K. Thanks, Jeff.
Do you, do you have documentation for this?
LARRY NICHOLS: As a matter of fact, I do, sir. And that's why I'm
striving so hard to get a congressional hearing. Because I don't
think the documents need to be put out in the media, and I can
explain that.
DONAHUE: Why hasn't Fiske come after your documents?
NICHOLS: Robert Fiske better not come after *my* documents.
Because if he tries to seal them, the next day, when he serves me
a subpoena, the next day it'll be all over the media. Everything
*I* have will be out.
DONAHUE: I see. So you'll get... So it's a "win-win." {1}. You'll
get the publicity that you've been asking for all along... beyond
talk radio.
NICHOLS: Well, I don't want publicity. I want the information
out.
DONAHUE: None of this is to benefit *your* personal career
endeavors, but to get this information out so we know the truth.
Hopefully....
NICHOLS: Absolutely.
DONAHUE: We'll be right back with Larry Nichols, and your calls.
1-800-298-8255.
[...Commercial break...]
DONAHUE: We're back. Tom Donahue, "America's Town Forum,"
patriotism in action.
Back to the phones we go for Larry Nichols. Let's start off with
Harold, in Flint, Michigan. Go ahead, Harold.
HAROLD: Yeah. Um, Tom. I'd like to ask your guest if
[unintelligible] with the gun control bills.
DONAHUE: Say, say again?
HAROLD: I'd like to ask your guest if he thinks we'll be able to
beat the sickness in the White House on the gun control issue.
DONAHUE: O.K. Thank you, Harold.
Um, it looks like our Congress is trying to disarm the American
people, and they're getting very close, with the numbers today,
and you should be calling your congressman to say, "Hell, no."
You will not tolerate *any* diminution of our rights. No
infringement, period. Any, any weapon can be an "assault weapon,"
and any weapon could be a weapon on the battlefield. {2}.
Go ahead, Larry.
NICHOLS: Well, I believe, if y'all know what I know about Bill
Clinton and his agenda: One of the things that they *have* to do
is disarm us. The next thing they have to do is "educate" our
children, the way *they* want them educated. And I just pray that
Congress -- and I have no reason to believe in 'em any more --
but I just pray that they'll stop this madness. Because when they
take our "assault weapons," that's step one. What will they take
next? When they get health care through -- and you heard Jay
Rockefeller say, "I don't care what the American people want,
we're gonna get it anyway." What happens when they get health
care? They have access to yours and mine and everybody's medical
files.
DONAHUE: Well if they're gonna take away "assault weapons," the
weapons in general, then let's take away Bill Clinton's security
team. Let's take away Secret Service. Let's take the weapons that
protect our congressmen...
NICHOLS: That's right.
DONAHUE: ...Huh. Fat chance.
NICHOLS: You see, if it's O.K. once you take the "assault
weapons" away, nothin' will happen to ya, then take 'em away from
the security guards.
DONAHUE: That's right. Bill Clinton should volunteer and step up
to the plate first. And then we'll believe he's serious about gun
control and disarmament.
Let's go to Bob in Golden, Colorado. Go ahead, Bob.
BOB: Hello, Larry.
NICHOLS: How do you do, sir.
BOB: I have heard you on other broadcasts where Danny Casalero's
name was mentioned and the Octopus Conspiracy which attempts to
describe these upper levels of... You talk about Clinton being on
the fifth level down. This Casalero story was talking about maybe
the second tier up. Can you speculate or describe the operatives
in that story that Casalero was developing at the time he was
murdered?
NICHOLS: Whoa! Uh Bob, some of what -- it is "Bob," right? Hello?
DONAHUE: Bob's listening on his radio.
NICHOLS: O.K. I don't know how to say this. There are some people
in that network that I obviously know. And I know them through
knowing the *contras*. But as you know, Mr. Casalero's dead. As
you know, he was dealing in matters that I do not deal in. Um, I
think you will find, when all of this settles -- if it settles
and we get a congressional hearing -- a lot of the unanswered
questions about all of the tentacles, where they go, where they
lead, will start coming into light.
But now let me give you the negative to that. As I've already
explained, long before these people at the power positions start
getting exposed, they will make the "offer" to Clinton in an
attempt to squash it at that level. And likely as not, they may
be, they may win at that.
DONAHUE: Larry, the next hour we're gonna talk to you about Terry
Reed and John Cummings' book, *Compromised: Clinton, Bush and the
CIA*. We touched on Mena. We need to go back to that and Dan
Lasater, CIA drugs-guns connection, and how both Presidents --
the one prior, too, George Bush, and Bill Clinton -- were co-
opted.
Larry Nichols has been our guest this hour. He'll be with us next
hour on many of these fine stations. Stay tuned. Our talk line
number is 1-800-298-8255. Clinton's Circle of Thugs, or
"Clinton's Circle of Power," is available. Just write to us at
America First. For $20.
(to be continued)
---------------------------<< Notes >>---------------------------
{1} "...it's a 'win-win.'" i.e., "Heads, I win. Tails, I win." He
wins no matter if Fiske seals his documents or not.
{2} Regarding "assault weapons." The ban on such weapons didn't
do Nicole Simpson any good. Whoever murdered her used a knife. A
gun of some type might have given *her* a chance to defend
herself however.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


363
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-45.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,363 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 45
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[From an interview with the former marketing director of the
Arkansas Development and Finance Authority, and former associate
of Bill Clinton, Larry Nichols. This interview took place on the
May 5, 1994 "America's Town Forum" radio show, hosted by Tom
Donahue. The show is broadcast most weekday evenings at 7 pm
(cst) on shortwave frequency 5.810 mHz. (Nichols speaks via
telephone with Donahue.)]
[...continued...]
TOM DONAHUE: Patriotism in action, Tom Donahue, "America's Town
Forum." So glad you could join us on our, uh "town hall" today.
Let me just tell you what's coming up tomorrow and Monday: Gary
Parks will be with us. He's the son of the slain Jerry Parks, who
provided security detail for Bill Clinton during his Presidential
campaign. And John Hillier(?) will be with us Monday.
So "Clinton-gate," 3 power-packed days. And today is no
exception. Larry Nichols, our return guest. Larry worked for Bill
Clinton at one time. He was the marketing director for the
Arkansas Development and Finance Authority [ADFA]. Larry, I'm
glad you're alive and well. I've heard you on other programs.
It's, I know you're a bit tentative at times, you're kind of
looking out the window, because you have *seen* the body count
rise in the last year or so. And I'm sure that there is a certain
amount of circumspection here as to whether you should be as
public in telling what you're telling. But isn't there also a
certain amount of "insurance" and security when you do so?
LARRY NICHOLS: Well that was the decision I made in 1990. I knew
that there was a good chance if I came out against Clinton that
I'd be one of the "unsolved mysteries" [i.e. murdered]. And it's
been part of my plan all along that as long as I maintained a
certain amount of visibility, then they really couldn't afford to
hurt me. And I've tried to do that.
DONAHUE: O.K. Let's talk about, if you could, uh we have some
stations just joining us; may not have been with us the first
hour. Give us an overview of what you think the strongest
allegations are against this President, this reprobate,
degenerate President, and why you believe it will force him to
either be *told* to, or "wake up and smell the roses," if you
will, that it's time for him to go back to, uh "the chicken
plucking state."
NICHOLS: The list of legitimate charges grows daily. As it
relates to *me* and my time with him, certainly the most serious
is that of laundering money through a state agency of which he
had to sign off [i.e. give final approval] on every bond issue,
number 1. Power brokering, number 2. Uh, slush funds, you name
it.
And if you took me plumb out of the picture, if you said, "O.K.
Everything about you is not significant," then you have to go to
what has happened since he's been President. And I think the
greatest of all was the raid on Vince Foster's office by
Nussbaum, his secretary, Hillary Clinton's personal secretary,
and Patsy Thomasson. Now anybody would know that you do not go in
and tamper with evidence.
I will tell you this, that a lady named Helen Dickey(?), who
works at the White House, who was Chelsea's nanny in Arkansas,
who went to Washington with them (uh, she could not get a
security clearance, so they listed her as a security person),
when, the day Foster died, she came into the White House and
said, "Vince Foster has been shot in the parking lot, in his
car."
DONAHUE: Hmmm... [surprised, pensive]
NICHOLS: Now to corroborate that statement. She called back to
the Governor's office here in Arkansas. And fortunately for us,
and unfortunately for her and Clinton, the person that was on
duty that took the call was none other than Roger Perry. {1}.
DONAHUE: I see.
NICHOLS: Roger Perry had to take that same message and pass it on
to the Governor and his wife. Now you say, "Well, what's
significant about him being shot in the parking lot versus the
park?" Even if we give them the point that he may have committed
suicide, the fact that he was in... on the premises of the White
House would give the law authorities immediate access to his
office. The fact that he was in the park, not on the premises of
the White House, meant that the police could be stalled by having
them to get a search warrant.
Now Nussbaum -- and Tom, I think you know, I brought it out on
your program -- when we first brought it out, they said that we
were lying.
DONAHUE: Yep. Um-hmm [agrees].
NICHOLS: Well then we find out they did do it.
Well then they said they took nothing from the office, from the
safe. Then we found out they did. Now that is tampering with
evidence in a criminal investigation. And a suicide, until it's
ruled a suicide, is a criminal investigation. Law school 101
tells everybody not to tamper with evidence. That is a serious
charge.
Now. Then we have the shredding of documents at the Rose Law
Firm. We have... You know, I said it on your program. "They're
shredding documents." Everybody called me a liar.
DONAHUE: Right. That's right.
NICHOLS: Well now we have the people that were shredding the
documents. Even after Fiske told them not to even take out the
garbage, the next day they were shredding documents. And are
shredding them still.
DONAHUE: And at the Rose Law Firm as well.
NICHOLS: And at the Rose Law Firm. Now. How does that affect us?
When Hillary Clinton had her press conference, last week or
whenever, you must notice that she always said, "I don't believe
that you will find anything to prove any wrongdoing." "I don't
think you will find..." "I don't think you will find..."
DONAHUE: [chuckles] Those were her words. Yeah.
NICHOLS: Why didn't she just say, "No"?!
DONAHUE: She learned something from the Watergate investigation.
She was an aide at that time to one of the congressmen, right?
NICHOLS: Yessir.
DONAHUE: Yeah. And so she learned that it probably does help to
destroy evidence. Don't keep it around like Nixon did.
NICHOLS: That's right. And you know, it's easy for her to say, "I
don't think you'll find...", when they've been shredding
documents! If I'd have been shredding documents, I don't think
you'd find it either!
So those are serious charges all.
DONAHUE: Let's go back to Foster. Uh, based on what you know,
people you've talked to, your own investigation, is it possible
it was a suicide? Or do you think the evidence is just so strong
in the direction that he had to be "taken out" [i.e. murdered]
for what he knew and... Tell us what you know.
NICHOLS: I can tell you this: That if it were a suicide, then
it's the only one like it in the annals of forensic medicine or
whatever they call that stuff. Because I've talked to tons of
people: It just doesn't happen.
Then when you add to the fact that the man with the van {2}, that
first found the body, has now been found... {3} You'll notice, 2
weeks ago Robert Fiske was gonna issue a report clearing the way
for a [determination of] suicide. Then all of a sudden, Gordon
Liddy announces the man with the van. Robert Fiske does not
release that report. And the man with the van, that found the
body, said he walked around the body for some 20 minutes. There
was no weapon anywhere, no gun to be found. And then when you add
the fact that his statement, which was, you know, that he didn't
even know he was dead because there was no blood, you know, just
a trickle out of his nose, a little out the side of his mouth.
You see, that's consistent with the ambulance driver's story.
No. Vince Foster didn't commit suicide.
DONAHUE: What would be the motivation to "take him out"? I'm
saying that naively, but there are naive people out there. Maybe
you can fill in the blanks.
NICHOLS: Vince Foster probably had the greatest amount of
evidence, of anybody in America, of the absolute actions of Bill
and Hillary -- their *illegal* actions. And I think he was about
to snap: from the "Travelgate," the constant microscope of the
media. He had information that, if it were to get out, would
destroy Clinton. And, back to the other caller about the levels,
the different tiers, I think he had information that would
destroy several tiers up on the power structure. And at that
point, he became a liability.
Did Bill Clinton sign an order to get him killed? No. The people
that profit from Bill Clinton being where he's at, they take care
of their own. And I think that Mr. Foster was in a precarious
situation.
DONAHUE: I wonder who this organization of thugs are that are
beating up reporters. Uh, you're finding people like Jerry Parks
assassinated, um slain because he knew too much. You have, um I
mean this really is a criminal enterprise, and it's gone from
Arkansas to the White House.
NICHOLS: That's right. And I've tried to forecast that. I've
tried to promise that to the people. And now, you see, with this
criminal enterprise... *I* believe it's a criminal group. When
you think about what they're doin', they're laughin' at us
because they're sayin', "Now *our* guys have semi-automatic
weapons. The police have 9-milimeter pistols."
It's the public that's armed and the public's gettin' mad and the
public's gonna stand up and stop things if the police don't.
They're gonna start taking... We're gonna be forced, as American
people, that take the law into their own hands to clean up our
neighborhoods. Agreed?
DONAHUE: Yeah {4}.
NICHOLS: If we are sitting there with equal force to match that
of the bad guys, then the bad guys got problems.
DONAHUE: It's a travesty of justice. Because I have a case goin'
on that they are, they have put together a vindictive prosecution
against me because of what I know and what I tell on a daily
basis.
And I walk into the Department of INjustice, or Criminal
INjustice, and see the pictures of Bill Clinton, and "Butcher"
Reno on the walls... You want to grab those and just smash 'em to
the floor and stomp on them. You're just so sickened by it,
because you know *those two* should be in jail.
NICHOLS: Well and that's the problem that I have. (By the way,
Tom, I still can't hear you very well.) The problem I have is
*where do you go*. When you walk in the courtroom, who do you
see? Sneering at you. When you try to put your faith in the
justice system, who's running it? They are.
DONAHUE: That's right.
NICHOLS: In Arkansas, in '88, everybody said, "Why didn't you
come on out? Why didn't you do this? Why didn't you do that?" --
Who could I have gone to?
DONAHUE: Let's talk about what you did and when you knew that
there was something wrong with the Arkansas Development and
Finance Authority. What actions specifically did you take? And
did you succeed?
NICHOLS: I made a mistake. If I could take back 30 seconds of my
life, I'd do it different. I went to Clinton and told him he was
breakin' the law, and that he had to tell or I would.
And then I was roasted mercilessly for 6 months. Destroyed. Now
back in *those* days, people didn't understand that if you bring
somethin' up, you get slammed by the media to protect Clinton. So
everybody in Arkansas thinks I am what they said I am. When in
fact, in 1989, I proved I didn't do what they said I was doin'.
Not only that, I proved *they* were doin' it. And like the
troopers' story, when they were found out, when the judge threw
out the case, that they did not commit fraud because they had no
evidence, you didn't hear in the media [that] the troopers were
tellin' the truth! Therefore what they're sayin' about Clinton
may be true. In 1989, I thought everbody would stand up and
cheer; not one piece was printed.
DONAHUE: Your mistake was telling Bill Clinton, "'Fess up," "Tell
the truth." Instead it gave him time to regroup and to retaliate.
NICHOLS: That, and I think if I look at what my family has paid,
and if I look at what's happened to us and what's happening to me
today: can't work, can't take money from people that want to
help, 'cause if I do then I'll be discredited. And it's tough to
fight the most powerful system in the world.
DONAHUE: It is. I understand. Let me ask you, what did you do,
what actions did you take, against then-Governor Bill Clinton?
NICHOLS: In 1990, I filed a lawsuit. I had to go in '89 and learn
law myself from the law library 'cause nobody would touch it. And
that lawsuit in 1990 had everything that you're hearing today,
for the most part. You'll notice one major thing: Bill Clinton,
as everybody now knows, controlled the courts, he controlled the
judges, he controlled the lawyers. If you doubt the integrity or
the significance of the evidence that I can bring forth: Why did
they not allow me to go to court and squish me like a bug? Why
did they quash, maneuver my case from judge to judge, seal it,
dismiss it under statute of limitations for slander when it was a
libel suit with 3 years statute [of limitations], seal it back
up, not even tell me or anybody else that they had opened it,
sealed it, and closed it?
DONAHUE: Whole lotta chicanery goin' on back there in Arkansas.
There's a lot of good people, it's a wonderful state, it's a
beautiful state to visit. But there's an oligarchy there and Bill
Clinton was part of it.
We're gonna come back with more of Larry Nichols' story. We're
gonna take your calls, I promise, at 1-800-298-8255.
(to be continued)
---------------------------<< Notes >>---------------------------
{1} Roger Perry [Parry(?)] may be one of the Arkansas state
troopers.
{2} The man with the van: Reportedly the first person to discover
Foster's body in Fort Marcy Park was a man driving a white van.
This witness has remained anonymous for fear that something will
happen to him if he goes public. As he has stated, "I don't want
to end up like that guy in the park." He claims, through his
advocate, G. Gordon Liddy, to have pulled into the park with the
purpose of relieving himself. He went to a secluded area where he
encountered Foster's corpse. This witness is emphatic that there
was *no gun* anywhere in the vicinity when he first arrived on
the scene. Furthermore, he has been interviewed by Liddy, a
former FBI agent, who followed standard FBI interrogation
procedure. Liddy is absolutely convinced that his witness is
telling the truth and is completely credible.
{3} "...the man with the van... has now been found." Liddy's (see
above) witness was persuaded by Liddy to be interviewed by the
FBI. However this witness still chooses to remain anonymous to
the general public.
{4} "...take the law into their own hands to clean up our
neighborhoods. Agreed?" No, not agreed. Yes, some of what's going
on is infuriating, but like the song says, "Keep cooly cool,
boy." [From "West Side Story"].
I see people supposedly on the verge of going on an armed
march to Washington, DC. Then I see that John DiNardo has had a
petition going around that simply asks that people *sign their
names* so that a proper investigation of the Waco Massacre can
begin. And when last I checked, John DiNardo couldn't even get
*100 people just to sign their names*!! So am I to believe that
we can't get 100 signatures, but that thousands of armed citizens
are gonna march on Washington, DC? Here's a clue for you: If the
FBI, CIA, etc. are monitoring this supposed march that is
supposedly going to occur, my guess is that they are laughing
their asses off. At us! At our stupid posturing that we can get a
real response to a call for an armed march on Washington, DC.
For all you brave people who won't sign a simple petition but
will risk your lives in a march on Washington, DC: Here's
something *really* brave you can try before your "grand march" --
public speaking. Gasp! Not that! Not public speaking! Sure, we'll
pick up a gun and march to Washington, but *please* don't ask us
to pick up a video camera, say something informative, and demand
that it be played on public access television. We're gonna march
and risk getting shot dead or imprisoned, but public speaking?!
Gasp! Please, not that. That's too scary!
Final disclaimer: I do *not* support any armed march on
Washington, DC. I *do* support that we pick up our video cameras,
march to the local cable operator, and go on public access TV.
Now *that* would take some guts.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


118
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-46.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 46
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[CN Editor -- I cannot vouch for the accuracy of *all* of the
following. It may or may not be true, I just don't know.]
[The following is a transcript of a recorded phone message put
out by a group in Chicago called "Citizens' Committee to Clean Up
the Courts [CCCC]." (312) 731-1100 and (312) 731-1505.]
Hi! Sherman Skolnick, Citizens' Committee to Clean Up the Courts,
9800 Oglesby.
When it comes to financial matters, far too many people believe
in fairy tales.
Fantasy #1: It is O.K. to enter your bank account and put it into
mutual funds. After all, mutual funds are safer than the stock
market. And also, mutual funds are run by skilled managers. *Oh
yeah?*
The facts: In the 1920s and early '30s a lot of folks put their
money into "investment trusts." Few checked out the by-laws. When
redemptions fell below a certain point, the trusts were frozen.
Those left in the pool often ended up with close to zero.
Investment trusts did have a lot of leverage: going up and
slamming down.
The 1930s and investment trusts left such a bad smell, after
World War II the name was changed to "mutual funds." Plenty of
mutual funds use paper and computer tricks to boost the so-called
yield. The dirty, dangerous game is called derivatives: a game
within a game within a Chinese box trick.
Fantasy #2: Banks are safer now than the 1920s and early '30s
because there is Federal Deposit Insurance [FDIC].
Fact: About 14 thousand banks with about a trillion dollars of
deposits are supposedly protected by FDIC which has approximately
$10 billion in reserves. Another insurance company with that kind
of rotten ratio would be declared bankrupt. So the FDIC logo on
the bank door means *nothing!*
Fantasy #3: It's safe to keep your valuables in a safe deposit
box. After all, it's inside a bank!
Fact: The safe deposit box vault is a separate company, not
linked to the bank. The FDIC does not cover the vault company. In
the 1930s, many deposit boxes were raided by bank officials when
the banks went under. Few complained. After all, who wanted to
prove what was inside their box? Some were hiding their valuables
from ex-wives and tax collectors.
The sons and daughters of such bank pirates later, after World
War II, formed state banks and savings and loans with the stolen
goods.
Fantasy #4: A mutual fund advertising it is made up of U.S.
government bonds is 100 percent safe. *Oh yeah?*
The facts: Many offer attractive yields boosted with derivatives
monkey-business tricks. Like other funds, these will freeze
redemptions at a certain point, *and* -- you'll get zero.
Fantasy #5: U.S. government bonds are safe. *Oh yeah?*
Fact: In recent years, Japan has purchased about two-thirds of
new issues of U.S. Treasury notes and bonds. Japan's purchases,
and those of Saudi Arabia, are the only ones the U.S. secretly
promises to redeem in gold. The U.S. Treasury, however, does not
*have* that much gold. In a panic, they may force U.S. citizens
to turn in their gold coins and bullion. It happened in 1934, it
can happen again.
Throughout history, every nation that went deep in debt
eventually renounced their government bonds. The U.S., of course,
is next.
Also, the united States lost the Vietnam war. Without exception,
throughout history, every ruling class that loses a war is
eventually overthrown.
The panic with the falling dollar compared to the yen is far more
serious than the press fakers tell you. Japan is making a run on
the dollar and a run on selling their U.S. commercial properties.
Foreign nations are getting set to get a bigger slice of America
by collapsing our government.
In Chicago, see us on cable tv, channel 21, 9 pm [cst] most
Monday evenings.
Play it again: The Rotten State's Attorney (312) 731-1505.
New message Tuesday; we change it several times a week.
Donations appreciated. Citizen's Committee to Clean Up the
Courts, 9800 South Oglesby, Chicago, [Illinois] 60617. For the
latest on courts, banks, espionage agencies, political
assassinations, and the news media. On 24 hours a day.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


212
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-47.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 47
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[From an interview with the former marketing director of the
Arkansas Development and Finance Authority, and former associate
of Bill Clinton, Larry Nichols. This interview took place on the
May 5, 1994 "America's Town Forum" radio show, hosted by Tom
Donahue. The show is broadcast most weekday evenings at 7 pm
(cst) on shortwave frequency 5.810 mHz. (Nichols speaks via
telephone with Donahue.)]
[...continued...]
TOM DONAHUE: We're back. Tom Donahue, "America's Town Forum."
Larry Nichols, our special guest. And the spotlight is on
"Clinton-gate," and Clinton's "futures," if you will -- not as in
cattle.
Uh, let's go to Jim, in Helena, Montana. Hi, Jim. Go ahead.
JIM: Hi.
DONAHUE: You're on the air, Jim. Go ahead, sir.
JIM: Yes. I was wondering how your guest feels about Clinton's
last days in office.
DONAHUE: O.K. Are these Clinton's last days?
LARRY NICHOLS: I believe very strongly, as a matter of fact I've
told millions of people around America, I told on your show it
would be, like, 60 days. Now we're down to the latter days.
I will say this: It will go quick. Much as with Nixon, you know
the straw of the um, last days were the "Night of the Long
Knives," when Nixon tried to throw all his fledglings up as
sacrificial lambs. That didn't work. A lot of people have asked
me, "Well, if it's gonna happen there oughta be signs now." {1}.
There's no fanfare for the President to resign. {2}. It'll happen
overnight. One minute it'll be one step too far. One minute, when
the hearings are called, he will step down, ostensibly saying
that to protect America, since he can't do his job because of all
this stuff, he's best to step aside.
Now I will caution you all: He still has tricks to stay alive,
number one involving our military in a conflict. Haiti. Bosnia.
To take a focal point off of him...
DONAHUE: North Korea.
NICHOLS: North Korea.
That's very dangerous. You must rise up and tell him not to put
his children, our children, in harm's way to save his career.
It's not worth one death! Vince Foster's death was not worth
anyone's political career.
DONAHUE: Absolutely not.
NICHOLS: So beware. He can do that.
DONAHUE: What do you think will be the final straw, Larry? What
do you think's gonna be the final, um evidence reaching the
masses that he'll say, "I *have* to step down. I've gotta step
aside."?
NICHOLS: Well it will start Sunday.
DONAHUE: Sunday?
NICHOLS: Ambrose Evans-Pritchard will release a story Sunday
about Patsy Thomasson. Patsy Thomasson was Dan Lasater's protege.
She worked with him. Um, Lasater, Clinton's best friend, went to
jail with Roger [Clinton]. Lasater had cocaine in the office; she
[Thomasson] was in there 25-50 times a day.
But she made some bogus bond trades that you will start hearing
about Sunday. {3}. Now what that does is it will put Patsy in a
very peculiar situation and she will probably become the next
"casualty" to be served up sacrificially.
DONAHUE: What is her role with the administration presently?
NICHOLS: If you can believe this, that lady, with that
background, is the assistant chief of management in the White
House. And it is her job to get everyone's in the White House
personnel records and get security clearances and she runs and
manages the White House.
DONAHUE: And she was an integral part of the Governor's staff
back in Arkansas, right?
NICHOLS: Yes sir.
DONAHUE: O.K.
NICHOLS: And when she is removed, *then* what happens is they do
not have total control of the personnel files. And things will
start picking up. And then you will start seeing, as you did on
[CBN] {4} and other shows, for the first time you're gonna start
seeing and hearing the words "drug laundering," and "money
through ADFA," and "money through Clinton." Much as you've
discussed with the Terry Reed, John Cummings book.
DONAHUE: And I've got that here as a note that I want to get to
in just a minute or two. I wanted to squeeze Ralph in, from
Dallas. Go ahead, Ralph.
Ralph, in Dallas. Your turn. Hi.
RALPH: I just wanted to make a comment and ask a question. Uh
trying to keep up with the Clinton story is very difficult
reading the local papers and the *New York Times* and the
*Washington Post*. But I find if I go to the library and read the
*London Times*, I get the *true* story and uh, facts of what's
happened. Incidentally, they have a different name than calling
it "Whitewater." They call it "Fornigate," rather than
"Whitewater."
DONAHUE: I've used that term. But I just say "Clintongate,"
because it's so encompassing.
RALPH: Uh the question I have is, if Clinton is gone, what are we
left with? Aren't we worse off with someone like Gore in there,
who's probably smarter than Clinton? Aren't we better off with
just a lot of stalemate that at least stops a lot of these
onerous laws...
DONAHUE: Let me have him address that before we have to break at
the bottom of the hour. Go ahead, Larry.
NICHOLS: I don't believe y'all... I don't know Mr. Gore. But I
can say this: I agree with nothing he believes in, but at least
he believes in somethin'. Bill Clinton, if he lives through this
volley, will be the most powerful man in the world and no one
will ever touch him again. {5}. And he will implement one police
force and other things that scare me to death.
DONAHUE: He'll be real "slick" then.
We're gonna come back and we'll take your calls for Larry
Nichols. Where our subject matter is "Clinton-gate." 1-800-298-
8255. Stay tuned.
(to be continued)
---------------------------<< Notes >>---------------------------
{1} "...there oughta be signs now." One "sign" may well be the
upcoming congressional hearings into Whitewater and Vince
Foster's death, scheduled to start at the end of July. Of course,
as with the "independent" prosecutor, Fiske, the "fix" may be in
for these hearings as well. Question: Given the extensive
coverage given to the travails of a football icon, O.J. Simpson,
by the mass media, will they deem these upcoming hearings to be
worthy of equal or better media coverage?
*If* the upcoming congressional hearings are the real thing
and not more smoke and mirrors, that may well be the "sign" of
"Good-bye, Clinton." As Nichols himself has written ["The Truth
Will Set Us Free," *For The People News Reporter*, May 30, 1994,
p. 13.], "...the hearings are partial to no one. There will be
Democrats trying to protect Bill Clinton and hurt people like me
and others telling their side of the story and you will have
Republicans more apt to believe us than Clinton. But the truth
is, the whole proceeding will be under oath and all speaking and
all evidence being brought forward will be subject to penalty or
perjury if not true. This is the great tiebreaker, this is the
one thing that Bill Clinton has feared since 1988, and it is the
one thing that will force him to resign before he is exposed for
past and present criminal wrongdoing."
{2} "There's no fanfare for the President to resign." Except here
at Conspiracy Nation (formerly Conspiracy for the Day). We
scooped *all* major newspapers, mass media, etc. when we called
for Clinton to resign in an editorial dated January 19, 1994,
which ended as follows:
Mr. President, for the honor of your departed mother,
for the good of the nation -- resign.
{3} "...she [Thomasson] made some bogus bond trades that you will
start hearing about Sunday." This would have been in the May 8,
1994, London *Sunday Telegraph*, it seems to me.
{4} "...and then you will start seeing, as you did on [CBN]..."
Nichols actually says PTL (not CBN), but I think he means CBN.
CBN *has* covered the "Mena connection," and I don't know that
PTL is even still on the air.
{5} "...no one will ever touch him [Clinton] again." I'm not so
pessimistic. With the 1994 congressional elections coming up, and
with the widespread disaffection with Clinton, Mr. Bill stands to
lose a great deal of power. That, in fact, may be a reason for
the *Democrats* to want to dump him fast. With a relatively
untarnished Gore as President, the Democrats might not lose so
many congressional seats in the Fall election.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


32
textfiles.com/conspiracy/CN/cn1-48.txt Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 1 Num. 48
======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
HAS CONSPIRACY FILES
FILES WILL TRAVEL
WIRE A.J. TEEL, BOULDER, COLORADO
Send message
help
to InfoBot@andronix.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe my-email@address"
to bigxc@prairienet.org -- To cancel, send a message in the form
"cancel my-email@address." && Articles sent in are considered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9


Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More