info/why-linux-is-better
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/nbeaver/why-linux-is-better.git synced 2025-08-29 00:29:48 +02:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Reword section titles to be more accurate.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Nathaniel Beaver
2015-08-21 16:24:50 -05:00
parent dac2fbc41d
commit 80467d9461
1 changed files with 13 additions and 12 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

25
README.rst
View File

@@ -115,9 +115,9 @@ If you are a Windows user:
You may heartily disagree with substantial parts of what follows, You may heartily disagree with substantial parts of what follows,
but perhaps it may be useful to you, even so. but perhaps it may be useful to you, even so.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Technical deficiencies of Windows relative to Linux. Intrinsic technical deficiencies of Windows
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
------------------------ ------------------------
Live booting is lacking. Live booting is lacking.
@@ -561,13 +561,13 @@ which was designed as a multi-user system.
This means that, for example, a read-only folder cannot have files added to it, This means that, for example, a read-only folder cannot have files added to it,
and read-only files cannot be moved, renamed, or deleted without first removing the read-only status. and read-only files cannot be moved, renamed, or deleted without first removing the read-only status.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Architectural benefits of Linux. Architectural deficiencies of Windows
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
------------------------------------- --------------------------------
Debugging tools available by default. Limited default debugging tools.
------------------------------------- --------------------------------
.. TODO: Using the informal you here seems to be the only option. .. TODO: Using the informal you here seems to be the only option.
Everything else I can think of is too awkwardly phrased. Everything else I can think of is too awkwardly phrased.
@@ -598,9 +598,9 @@ so system administrators can rely on being able to use them on nearly any Linux
.. _programs: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896647.aspx .. _programs: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896647.aspx
.. _similar: http://www.intellectualheaven.com/default.asp?BH=projects&H=strace.htm .. _similar: http://www.intellectualheaven.com/default.asp?BH=projects&H=strace.htm
----------------------------- ---------------------------------
More permissive file locking. Restrictive default file locking.
----------------------------- ---------------------------------
.. TODO: Add more sources to this. .. TODO: Add more sources to this.
@@ -653,6 +653,7 @@ Usability issues.
The window manager monoculture means that accessibility improvements The window manager monoculture means that accessibility improvements
and user interface customization can be difficult to implement. and user interface customization can be difficult to implement.
For example, Windows presents many configuration options in non-resizable dialog boxes. For example, Windows presents many configuration options in non-resizable dialog boxes.
This can pose user-interface problems, This can pose user-interface problems,
especially on high-resolution monitors. [#]_ [#]_ especially on high-resolution monitors. [#]_ [#]_