mirror of
https://github.com/nbeaver/why-linux-is-better.git
synced 2025-08-26 23:34:34 +02:00
Quick edits.
This commit is contained in:
11
README.rst
11
README.rst
@@ -640,10 +640,9 @@ but such restrictions do not apply to filenames.)
|
||||
.. _such as storing strings of arbitrary length: https://www.lysator.liu.se/c/bwk-on-pascal.html
|
||||
.. _Windows use null-terminated strings: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2009/10/08/9904646.aspx
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
Limited choice in filesystems.
|
||||
------------------------------
|
||||
---------------------------
|
||||
Limited filesystem support.
|
||||
---------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Windows has built-in support for its own NTFS filesystem,
|
||||
UDF (used for some CDs and DVDs),
|
||||
@@ -667,7 +666,9 @@ For the system partition,
|
||||
Linux users can choose among the usual ext3 journaling filesystem
|
||||
or
|
||||
up-and-coming filesystems like `Btrfs`_.
|
||||
Unlike FAT and NTFS filesystems, ext3 and Btrfs `do not require defragmentation`_.
|
||||
Unlike FAT and NTFS filesystems,
|
||||
ext3 and Btrfs `do not require defragmentation`_
|
||||
to maintain good performance.
|
||||
Realistically, though, `defragmentation isn't that important for NTFS`_, either.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _Btrfs: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user