mirror of
https://github.com/nbeaver/why-linux-is-better.git
synced 2025-08-27 07:44:25 +02:00
Quick edits.
This commit is contained in:
11
README.rst
11
README.rst
@@ -640,10 +640,9 @@ but such restrictions do not apply to filenames.)
|
|||||||
.. _such as storing strings of arbitrary length: https://www.lysator.liu.se/c/bwk-on-pascal.html
|
.. _such as storing strings of arbitrary length: https://www.lysator.liu.se/c/bwk-on-pascal.html
|
||||||
.. _Windows use null-terminated strings: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2009/10/08/9904646.aspx
|
.. _Windows use null-terminated strings: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2009/10/08/9904646.aspx
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---------------------------
|
||||||
------------------------------
|
Limited filesystem support.
|
||||||
Limited choice in filesystems.
|
---------------------------
|
||||||
------------------------------
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Windows has built-in support for its own NTFS filesystem,
|
Windows has built-in support for its own NTFS filesystem,
|
||||||
UDF (used for some CDs and DVDs),
|
UDF (used for some CDs and DVDs),
|
||||||
@@ -667,7 +666,9 @@ For the system partition,
|
|||||||
Linux users can choose among the usual ext3 journaling filesystem
|
Linux users can choose among the usual ext3 journaling filesystem
|
||||||
or
|
or
|
||||||
up-and-coming filesystems like `Btrfs`_.
|
up-and-coming filesystems like `Btrfs`_.
|
||||||
Unlike FAT and NTFS filesystems, ext3 and Btrfs `do not require defragmentation`_.
|
Unlike FAT and NTFS filesystems,
|
||||||
|
ext3 and Btrfs `do not require defragmentation`_
|
||||||
|
to maintain good performance.
|
||||||
Realistically, though, `defragmentation isn't that important for NTFS`_, either.
|
Realistically, though, `defragmentation isn't that important for NTFS`_, either.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
.. _Btrfs: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page
|
.. _Btrfs: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user