openscad/dotSCAD
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/JustinSDK/dotSCAD.git synced 2025-07-31 03:50:27 +02:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

update doc

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Justin Lin
2019-06-15 10:18:19 +08:00
parent e3443bf0e8
commit a07244fd47
6 changed files with 12 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
docs/lib-bijection_offset.md
View File

@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ Move 2D outlines outward or inward by a given amount. Each point of the offsette
include <bijection_offset.scad>;
include <rotate_p.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;
include <bezier_curve.scad>;

7
docs/lib-path_extrude.md
View File

@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ When using this module, you should use points to represent the 2D shape. If your
include <rotate_p.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;
include <bezier_curve.scad>;
@@ -83,6 +84,7 @@ When using this module, you should use points to represent the 2D shape. If your
include <rotate_p.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;
include <bezier_curve.scad>;
@@ -157,6 +159,7 @@ If you have only points, what `path_extrude` can do is to **guess** data about r
include <rotate_p.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <helix.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;
shape_pts = [
@@ -183,6 +186,7 @@ You might think this is wrong. Actually, it's not. It's the correct/default beha
include <rotate_p.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <helix.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;
shape_pts = [
@@ -208,6 +212,7 @@ You might think this is wrong. Actually, it's not. It's the correct/default beha
include <rotate_p.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;
shape_pts = [[5, -5], [5, 5], [-5, 5], [-5, -5]];
@@ -234,6 +239,7 @@ The problem doesn't happen when `method` is `"AXIS_ANGLE"`.
include <rotate_p.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;
shape_pts = [[5, -5], [5, 5], [-5, 5], [-5, -5]];
@@ -265,6 +271,7 @@ So, which is the correct method? Both methods are correct when you provide only
include <shape_pentagram.scad>;
include <rotate_p.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;
include <torus_knot.scad>;

1
docs/lib-shape_arc.md
View File

@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ Returns shape points of an arc shape. They can be used with xxx_extrude modules
include <shape_arc.scad>;
include <rotate_p.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;
include <bezier_curve.scad>;

1
docs/lib-shape_path_extend.md
View File

@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ It depends on the `rotate_p` function. Remember to include "rotate_p.scad".
include <shape_path_extend.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;

1
docs/lib-shape_trapezium.md
View File

@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ Returns shape points of an isosceles trapezoid. They can be used with xxx_extrud
include <shape_trapezium.scad>;
include <rotate_p.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;
include <bezier_curve.scad>;

1
docs/lib-torus_knot.md
View File

@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ Generate a path of [The (p,q)-torus knot](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torus_kn
include <shape_pentagram.scad>;
include <rotate_p.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;
include <torus_knot.scad>;