openscad/dotSCAD
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/JustinSDK/dotSCAD.git synced 2025-09-25 05:51:41 +02:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

update doc

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Justin Lin
2019-06-22 14:10:37 +08:00
parent d743f36086
commit fbd10cd25d
6 changed files with 0 additions and 16 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
docs/lib-path_extrude.md
View File

@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ When using this module, you should use points to represent the 2D shape. If your
include <rotate_p.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;
include <bezier_curve.scad>;
@@ -48,7 +47,6 @@ When using this module, you should use points to represent the 2D shape. If your
include <rotate_p.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;
include <bezier_curve.scad>;
@@ -83,7 +81,6 @@ When using this module, you should use points to represent the 2D shape. If your
include <rotate_p.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;
include <bezier_curve.scad>;
@@ -158,7 +155,6 @@ If you have only points, what `path_extrude` can do is to **guess** data about r
include <rotate_p.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <helix.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;
shape_pts = [
@@ -185,7 +181,6 @@ You might think this is wrong. Actually, it's not. It's the correct/default beha
include <rotate_p.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <helix.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;
shape_pts = [
@@ -211,7 +206,6 @@ You might think this is wrong. Actually, it's not. It's the correct/default beha
include <rotate_p.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;
shape_pts = [[5, -5], [5, 5], [-5, 5], [-5, -5]];
@@ -238,7 +232,6 @@ The problem doesn't happen when `method` is `"AXIS_ANGLE"`.
include <rotate_p.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;
shape_pts = [[5, -5], [5, 5], [-5, 5], [-5, -5]];
@@ -270,7 +263,6 @@ So, which is the correct method? Both methods are correct when you provide only
include <shape_pentagram.scad>;
include <rotate_p.scad>;
include <polysections.scad>;
include <m_rotation.scad>;
include <path_extrude.scad>;
include <torus_knot.scad>;